Onlay Mesh Research Articles

An emerging, less explored Subcutaneous onlay laparoscopic approach for ventral hernias with concomitant diastasis recti

Ventral Hernia (VH) is a common issue in patients with Diastasis Recti (DR). VH with concomitant DR presents a challenging scenario for surgical repair due to complexity of abdominal wall defects. Traditional open surgical procedure is associated with prolonged discomfort and poor cosmesis and resultant patients’ unacceptability. Minimal access surgery such as Sub Cutaneous Onlay Laparoscopic Approach (SCOLA), offers innovative solution in addressing both hernia defects and DR comprehensively and circumvent drawbacks of open surgery. In this prospective observational study, 33 patients with VH and DR underwent SCOLA in a tertiary care hospital in Jamnagar, India over a period of 15 months. Reconstruction of abdominal wall was done by suturing hernia defect, plication of DR and onlay polypropylene mesh augmentation by using this technique. No recurrence was detected at follow up from 4 to 18 month. Overall patient satisfaction rate was 90.9%. We conclude that, the SCOLA is a promising advancement in the treatment of patients of VH with DR with many benefits.

A study of comparison of perioperative complications in intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique vs extended view totally extraperitoneal ventral hernia repair

Background: Abdominal hernia occurs through the layers of the abdominal wall at a weak point. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is an established treatment for ventral hernias. This study was conducted in patients who underwent e-TEP and IPOM surgery for ventral hernia to characterize postoperative pain, recovery time, and quality of life. Predefined preoperative and peri-operative factors were examined for their potential impact. Methods: A prospective study on a total of 50 patients who underwent IPOM and e-TEP for ventral hernia was conducted, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients were randomized by simple random sampling technique and were divided into two groups of 25 each (Group A- e-TEP and Group B- IPOM). Data of both groups were compared and analysed for statistical significance using Chi square test and Student ‘t’ test. Results: The eTEP approach provides benefits compared to IPOM in terms of reduced hospital stay, earlier return to work and cost effective. However, eTEP is linked to complex learning process and in the end the decision of the surgery type should be made on the basis of specific patient’s conditions, surgeon’s expertise and availability of resources Conclusions: In study we found that both surgeries were comparable, with each having some benefits over the other.

Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias

Comparing procedural costs and early clinical outcomes of robotic extended totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) with intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair for midline ventral hernias

Enhanced view totally extraperitoneal approach: The best available option for recurrent incisional hernias following previous laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus repairs.

The available options for recurrent incisional hernias (RIH) following previous laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) plus were open onlay repair, open Rives-Stoppa (RS), laparoscopic enhanced view totally extraperitoneal-RS (ETEP-RS) and laparoscopic subcutaneous onlay mesh repair. Majority of these RIH were managed by open onlay mesh repairs or laparoscopic Redo IPOM plus. There are not much data available in the literature on the ETEP approach for RIH following previous IPOM plus with the placement of mesh in the retrorectus space. In this article, I would like to share technical aspects, challenges faced and tips to overcome these challenges of performing ETEP for RIH following previous IPOM plus repairs.

Epigastric Ventral Hernia Repair Through Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery.

Ventral hernia repair is a commonly performed operation and can be executed by open or laparoscopic approach. The search for even less invasive techniques continues. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a known method of minimally invasive surgery. We performed an epigastric ventral hernia repair through vaginal NOTES during a concurrent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingectomy. We used the access to do a synchronous hernia repair with mesh augmentation. The technique of repair was identical to the laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (Lap. IPOM). We reported a sufficient hernia repair without intra-operative complications. Also, post-operatively, no problems were encountered. Follow-up after 4 weeks showed a good and strong hernia repair. The complaints of the patient were relieved. CT scan 10 months after operation showed no recurrence nor signs of mesh infection. Ventral hernia repair through vaginal NOTES can be considered a possible new and minimal invasive (scarless) technique for ventral hernia repair but further investigations on a larger scale are needed to confirm feasibility & safety.

Prophylactic onlay mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection: A prospective comparative study a year follow-up, a single-center experience

Prophylactic onlay mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection: A prospective comparative study a year follow-up, a single-center experience

Mesh exposure after ventral hernia repair with onlay biosynthetic mesh: a retrospective review of associated risk factors and management strategies.

Although intraperitoneal and retromuscular mesh placement in ventral hernia repair (VHR) are associated with lower recurrence rates, the onlay plane remains a well-established option for certain clinical scenarios. A knowledge gap remains regarding resorbable biosynthetic onlay mesh and mesh exposure. We aim to determine exposure rate, risk factors, and treatment options. A single-center, two-surgeon retrospective review was performed examining patients who underwent VHR with onlay, Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh from 2015 to 2021. Demographics, operative characteristics, outcomes, and mesh exposure management were analyzed. Of 346 patients, 15 (4.3%) experienced mesh exposure. The mean age was 53 years and BMI of 33.6kg/m2. Patients were majority ASA class 3 (65%), female (64.2%), and averaged a defect size of 307.9 ± 235.2 cm2. Independent risk factors included diabetes (AOR = 4.3,CI 1.5-12.5;p < 0.005) and COPD (AOR = 5.2,CI 1.3-21.8;p = 0.02). Mesh exposures were identified as outpatient (20%) or intraoperative (80%). All underwent operative debridement, in which nine were managed with skin reclosure, two with partial closure, and four healed by secondary intention. Five patients required excision of unincorporated mesh. Four patients required further debridement from chronic surgical site occurrences; however, all mesh exposure patents healed after a mean of 260.8 ± 313.2 days and retained original mesh. The recurrence rate was 6.7% for mesh exposure patients. When faced with mesh exposure, resorbable biosynthetic mesh placed in onlay fashion was retained in all patients. Patients with a history of diabetes or COPD have increased risk of mesh exposure and should be counseled.

Comparison of eTEP and IPOM for ventral hernia surgery in the early postoperative period: a retrospective cohort study of a tertiary university centre

PurposeThe extended totally extraperitoneal technique (eTEP) is a relatively new laparoscopic approach to address ventral hernias. Since this technique is not widely used yet, the literature regarding its efficacy and safety is limited, especially when compared to more established surgical techniques like intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). This study aimed at contributing to the expanding body of evidence for eTEP, by comparing the early outcomes of eTEP and IPOM surgeries for ventral hernias.MethodsThis monocentric, retrospective cohort study compared patients with ventral hernias that were treated with eTEP or IPOM from 2019 to 2023.ResultsA total of 123 patients were analysed. 92 underwent eTEP and 31 IPOM respectively. Both groups were overall comparable. The IPOM group had a higher proportion of incisional hernias (61,29% vs. 21,74%, p < 0,001). This was taken into account for in a subgroup analysis of only primary hernias. The IPOM group had a significantly longer admission time (eTEP: 3 days, IPOM: 4 days, p < 0,001). The subgroup analysis revealed a statistically significant shorter surgery time in IPOM (median of 66,5 min vs. 106,5 min; p = 0,043) and a lower rate of postoperative complications in eTEP (eTEP: 4,17%, IPOM: 25%. p = 0,009). The eTEP group reported lower postoperative pain, yet without statistical significance.ConclusioneTEP for ventral hernia repair appears to be non-inferior to IPOM. Compared to IPOM it leads to shorter postoperative hospital stay and a potentially lower complication rate, despite a longer operation time.

Robotic parastomal hernia repair: A single-center cohort study.

Parastomal hernia is a common occurrence following stoma construction, necessitating surgical intervention in symptomatic cases. This study presents a comprehensive analysis of Robotic-Assisted Parastomal Hernia Repair (r-PSHR), utilizing the Da Vinci Xi™ Surgical System. Retrospective analysis was conducted on patients undergoing r-PSHR at a high-volume center. Surgical variables, complications, and recurrence rates were assessed. The primary technique involved a modified Sugarbaker intraperitoneal onlay mesh. Eighty-six patients underwent r-PSHR, predominantly females (59.3%), with mean age 60.8years. Mean BMI was 31.0. Most patients were classified as ASA 2 (31.4%) or ASA 3 (65.1), with 64.6% having no prior PSH repair. Index procedures primarily involved laparoscopic colonic resections (27.8%) and open abdominoperineal resections (27.8%). Parastomal hernias were mainly associated with end ileostomy (50%) and end colostomy (47.7%). A hybrid modification was required in 22.1% of cases, with only one conversion to open repair. Mean operative time was 257min. Thirty-day morbidity was 40.7% and includes ileus (24.4%), deep surgical-site infections (7.0%), acute kidney injury (5.8%), and sepsis (5.8%). Grade IIIB complications occurred in 5.8% of cases. Thirty-day readmissions were observed in 19.8% of cases. There were five cases (5.8%) of recurrence within 15months post-surgery. This study highlights the effectiveness of r-PSHR in managing parastomal hernia. R-PSHR shows promising outcomes with an acceptable post-operative occurrence profile and a favorable recurrence rate.

Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair (IPOM) versus Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh Repair with Closure of Fascia Defect (IPOM Plus) for Ventral Hernias: Retrospective Analysis of Postoperative Outcomes

Background: Intra-peritoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) repair, a type of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair (LVHR), comprises bridging the defect from the peritoneal side with a composite mesh. Recently, IPOMPlus has become the recommended type of LVHR in which the defect in the fascia is sutured before placing the mesh. Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Dharan Hospital, Salem. Patients who had undergone IPOM-Plus or IPOM during January 2020 to June 2021 were selected. Data regarding demographics, intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were collected from medical record section. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 taking a p-value of &lt;0.05 as statistically significant. Results: A total of 74 patients were included in this study, out of which 34 patients had undergone IPOM (Group A) and 40 patients underwent IPOM-Plus (Group B). In both the groups, there was no statistical difference in demographic variables except more number of umbilical hernia in both the groups compared to epigastric and paraumbilical hernia. Hernia defect size and mean operative time were varied significantly (p-value &lt; 0.05) in both groups. More number of seroma formation (p=0.021), pseudosac at first OPD visit (p=0.020) and pseudosac at 6 months (p=0.027) in Group A compared to Group B. Conclusions: IPOM plus repair is safe with possible advantages over a standard IPOM repair in patients with ventral hernia in term of postoperative outcomes. Keywords: Ventral hernia, IPOM, IPOM Plus, Laparoscopy

Assessment of the effectiveness of a polypropylene onlay mesh in the prevention of laparoscopic trocar-site incisional hernia in high-risk patients. A randomized clinical trial

PurposeTrocar site incisional hernia (TSIH) is a common complication of laparoscopic surgery. In the scientific literature there are few descriptions of methods or tools for its prevention. The aim of this report was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a prophylactic measure designed to lower rates of TSIH.MethodsA multicenter randomized double-blinded clinical trial was performed in high-risk patients (diabetes mellitus and/or age ≥ 70 years and/or BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 and/or extended incision for specimen retrieval) who underwent either elective or emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were assigned to prophylactic onlay polypropylene mesh fixation (intervention) or to standard trocar closure (control). The main aim was to analyze the efficacy of the intervention, taking occurrence of TSIH as the primary outcome. Clinical and radiological follow up lasted at least one year after surgery. Secondary endpoints were technique-related complications (surgical site occurrences).ResultsOne hundred and forty-three patients were randomized and finally 116 were analyzed (64 in the intervention arm and 52 in the control arm). Groups were homogeneous. Mean [SD] age, 65 [18] years; 86 (60.6%) were women. The cumulative TSIH incidence was lower in the intervention group although the differences did not reach statistical significance, assessed either radiologically (16 [25.4%] vs 17 [31.5%], p = 0.538) or clinically (9 [16.1%] vs 9 [20], p = 0.613). No differences in surgical site infection, hematoma or seroma were detected. Mean follow-up was 670 days (range 223–1294).ConclusionOur results show that, when properly assessed, the overall TSIH incidence is extremely high. Although polypropylene onlay mesh placement is safe, it does not appear to be effective in reducing the TSIH incidence rate. Radiological evaluation may be more accurate.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.org NCT03495557. Date of registration: April 12, 2018

Modified Chevrel Technique: A Lifesaver for Surgeons.

Background and Objectives: Ventral hernias (VH) pose significant challenges for surgeons due to the risk of recurrence, complexities in aligning abdominal muscles, and selecting the most suitable layer for mesh augmentation. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of utilizing the anterior rectus fascia as a turnover flap in conjunction with onlay mesh reinforcement, a procedure known as the modified Chevrel technique (MCT). Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who were operated on using MCT for abdominal hernias between January 2013 and December 2019. Data were extracted from our hospital's electronic database. Recurrence rates, as well as the rates of surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections (SSI), and surgical site occurrences requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI), were analyzed based on patients' comorbidities and demographic characteristics. Results: The median follow-up period was 42.9 months (range: 14-96), and the recurrence rate was 4% (n = 3). Among the recurrent cases, three patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, representing a statistically significant association (p = 0.02). Although all patients with recurrence were obese, this association did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). The mean hospitalization duration was 17.6 days (range: 6-29). SSO, SSI, and SSOPI rates were 39 (52%), 12 (16%), and 32 (42%), respectively. Conclusions: Managing VH remains a surgical challenge, emphasizing the importance of achieving effective abdominal closure for both functional and cosmetic outcomes. MCT presents a relatively simple approach compared to techniques like transversus abdominis release (TAR) and anterior component separation (ACS), with acceptable rates of SSO, SSOPI, SSI, and recurrence.

Laparoscopic intra-peritoneal onlay mesh plus versus robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal for primary ventral hernias: Our technique and outcomes.

Intra-peritoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) still remains the most common approach for laparoscopic repair of small to medium sized hernias worldwide. In this study, we compare our early outcomes of an established procedure, i.e. laparoscopic IPOM plus to robotic transabdominal pre-peritoneal (rTAPP) for small to medium sized primary ventral hernia. To compare laparoscopic IPOM plus with rTAPP in terms of pain score, time to ambulate, hospital stay, time to return to work as well as the expenses. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at our centre between July 2021 and June 2022. Operative time including docking time was recorded. Cost analysis was done in both set of patients. Pain scores were assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at regular intervals for up to 3 months and then at the end of 1 year. Time to ambulate, return of bowel function and return to work were documented. Any complication or recurrence during the study period was recorded. Mean operative time for IPOM plus and rTAPP groups was 59.00 and 73.55 min, respectively. Mean pain score for IPOM at 6, 12 and 24 h was 7.35, 6.81 and 5.77, while for rTAPP, it was 4.73, 3 and 2.55, respectively. VAS scores at 1 week, 1 month and 3 month also showed similar trends. Mean time to ambulate in minutes for IPOM and rTAPP group was 357.69 and 223.64, respectively. Mean hospital stay in days for IPOM and rTAPP was 2.12 and 1.18, respectively. Mean time to return to work in days was 11.77 and 8.45 for IPOM and rTAPP groups, respectively. Expenditure wise, cost of TAPP was more and statistically significant, owing to the use of robotic platform. The mean overall cost of laparoscopic IPOM plus and rTAPP in rupees was 187,177.69 and 245,174.55, respectively. Robotic TAPP appears an excellent alternative to laparoscopic IPOM plus. Larger studies with long-term follow-up data are further required to reinforce it.

A retrospective study of predisposing factors and management of incisional hernia in a tertiary care hospital

Background: An incisional hernia is characterized as any defect in the abdominal wall, with or without a noticeable bulge, in the region of a postoperative scar, identifiable through clinical examination or imaging. This condition can be detected through clinical examination or imaging and affects approximately 10-20% of patients who undergo abdominal operations. Aims and objectives of the study was to evaluate various precipitating factors, clinical presentations, management and post-operative complications in patients with incisional hernia. Methods: A retrospective study of 150 patients conducted at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Results: In this study, incisional hernia was more common in obese, elderly, and female patients. The incidence was higher with Pfannenstiel incision followed by lower midline incisions. Incisional hernia was common between 1-5 years of index surgery and it was observed that more the risk factors and complications associated with index surgery, earlier was the onset of incisional hernia. Patients had a defect of size &lt;4x4 cm were 58.66%. Open onlay mesh repair was done in 36.66% patients, preperitoneal mesh repair in 13.33%, retro rectus mesh repair in 13.33%, laparoscopic mesh repair in 28.66% and anatomical repair alone in 7.99% patients. Duration of laparoscopic surgery was longer compared to open. Most common post- operative complication was seroma (4.66%) followed by wound infection (2.66%). Conclusions: Incisional hernias occur more in females as they commonly undergo lower abdominal surgeries. Subcutaneous suction drain decreased the incidence of post-operative wound complications.

Posterior components separation with transversus abdominis release and sublay mesh reinforcement in large ventral hernia repair

AbstractAimVentral abdominal hernia is a prevalent condition among surgical patients. Large ventral hernias with defects &gt;10 cm that cannot be closed primarily, often with loss of domain requiring abdominal wall reconstruction, pose a surgical challenge. Our study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of posterior components separation (PCS) with transversus abdominis release (TAR) and sublay mesh reinforcement in large ventral hernia repair, particularly in terms of surgical site occurrences (SSOs) and hernia recurrence.Patients and MethodsOur study included 40 adult patients presented to Tanta University Hospitals with a large ventral hernia (defect width ≥10 cm) from December 2021 to January 2023. All patients were submitted to PCS with TAR and sublay mesh reinforcement.ResultsThe mean age of the study population was 47.32 (standard deviation [SD] 9.31) years (range 36–65 years) with a mean body mass index of 33.55 (SD 3.42) kg/m2 (range 28.35–38.72 kg/m2). The major risk factors were obesity (95.00%), smoking (45.00%), and multiparity (45.00%). Midline incisional hernia was the most common type in 28 patients (70.00%). Thirty‐four patients (85%) achieved successful midline closure, while six patients required additional anterior components separation technique to achieve tensionless midline closure and an onlay mesh for functional reconstruction. Post‐operative SSOs occurred in 12 patients (30.00%), with subcutaneous seroma in 8 patients (20.00%) and wound dehiscence and necrosis in 4 patients (10.00%). Two patients (5.00%) experienced recurrence after a mean follow‐up period of 19.25 (SD 3.52) months.ConclusionsPCS with TAR and sublay mesh reinforcement is a reliable and durable technique for complex ventral hernia repair with low morbidity and recurrence rates. However, long‐term clinical outcomes with more cases are required to properly evaluate this technique.

Hybrid intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for incisional hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Laparoscopic IPOM is technically challenging, especially regarding fascial closure. Hybrid repair has been proposed as a simpler approach. We aimed to compare hybrid and laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair (IPOM) in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). We performed a systematic review of Cochrane, Scopus, and MEDLINE databases to identify studies comparing hybrid versus laparoscopic IPOM VHR reporting the outcomes of recurrence, mortality, seroma, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 4.1.2 using a random-effects model. We screened 2,896 articles and fully reviewed 22 of them. A total of five studies, encompassing 664 patients were included. Among them, 337 (50.8%) underwent laparoscopic IPOM. All patients had incisional hernias, with a mean diameter varying from 3 to 12.7cm, 60% were women, with a mean BMI varying from 29.5 to 38. The hybrid approach had a lower rate of seroma when compared to the laparoscopic (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.92; p = 0.038; I²=78%). We found no difference in recurrence, mortality, postoperative complications, reoperation, surgical site infection, and operative time between groups. Hybrid IPOM is a safe and effective method for incisional hernia repair. Moreover, it facilitates fascial defect closure and decreases postoperative seromas.

A Comparative Study in Elective Repair of Large Incisional Hernias Using On-Lay Mesh vs. Sub-Lay Mesh – A Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Ventral abdominal wall incisional hernia is defined as a defect in the musculo-fascial layers of the abdominal wall in the region of postoperative scar. There is a slight increase in the incidence of incisional hernia in the female gender. The higher percentage of incisional hernia in females might be due to laxity of abdominal wall muscles after multiple pregnancies and also increased incidence of obesity in females. Objective To assess incisional hernia repair using two different techniques: on-lay mesh and sub- lay mesh, as regards operative time, postoperative recurrence, wound infection, seroma, hematoma and flap necrosis. Patients and Methods The Pubmed, web of science and Scopus were searched on 15 March, 2022. The keywords incisional hernia, sub-lay mesh on-lay mesh, retromuscular mesh, polypropylene. Results and Conclusion According to our results, there is a statistical difference between onlay and sublay regarding intra-operative time as sublay mesh is more time consuming. Regarding post- operative complications there is no statistical difference in recurrence, seroma, hematoma, flap necrosis and infection but there is a statistical difference regarding in hospital stay as patients with sublay repair stays less than onlay.

High peritoneal incision approach in endoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for inguinal hernia after radical prostatectomy.

Inguinal hernia develops as one of the common complications after robotic or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP). Transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) for an inguinal hernia after RP is difficult to perform due to postoperative severe adhesions in the preperitoneal cavity. We have introduced a high peritoneal incision approach (HPIA) in TAPP for inguinal hernia patients in whom peritoneal dissection is difficult due to severe adhesions after RP. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAPP with a HPIA for patients with an inguinal hernia after robot-assisted RP (RARP). Patients characteristics and surgical outcome were evaluated by a retrospective analysis. From January 2014 to December 2017, 21 consecutive patients underwent TAPP for an inguinal hernia after RARP. Twenty-four lesions were the type 3b and three were type 3a according to the Nyhus classification. A circular incision TAPP was performed for 10 hernia lesions in eight patients and TAPP with HPIA was utilized for 17 lesions in 13 patients. The mean operation time for the unilateral hernia in the HPIA (137.8 ± 20.7 min) was significantly shorter than that (182.2 ± 42.0 min) in the circular incision TAPP (p = .038). The HPIA was complete in all patients, while the circular incision TAPP was converted to intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM)intraperitoneal onlay mesh in five patients (55.6%, p = .008) due to dense adhesions with difficult dissection. No recurrent was observed after follow-up period of 48 months in both groups. The TAPP with HPIA is feasible and a safe and reliable treatment of choice in patients with an inguinal hernia after RARP.

Postoperative complications and hernia recurrence after the use of various ventral hernia repair techniques

Prosthetic hernioplasty (HP) for ventral hernias (VH) has a complication rate of up to 27% and a hernia recurrence rate up of to 37%, depending on the chosen technique. The use of laparoscopic HP techniques allows for a shorter hospital stay and a lower risk of wound infection. There is a wide range of data on the superiority of laparoscopy over the open technique in terms of recurrence rates and various types of complications. The results of comparing HP with and without suturing of the hernia defect are controversial. Objective — to study the structure and incidence of postoperative complications, as well as the frequency of hernia recurrences after the use of open and laparoscopic HP for VH. Materials and methods. A multicenter prospective study, which included 482 patients diagnosed with VH, was conducted at the clinical base of the Department of General Surgery No. 2 at Bogomolets National Medical University. A total of 279 (57.9%) patients had primary VH, while 203 (42.1%) had incisional VH. The patients were divided into two groups, comparable in terms of age, sex, and hernia size distribution. Group 1 included 250 (51.9%) patients who underwent open HP with suturing of the hernia defect: subgroup 1a — open sublay (n=243; 50.4%), and subgroup 1b — open intraperitoneal onlay mesh technique (IPOM) (n=7; 1.5%). Group 2 included 232 (48.1%) patients who underwent laparoscopic HP using the IPOM technique: subgroup 2a — IPOM without suturing of the aponeurosis defect (n=81; 16.8%), subgroup 2b — IPOM with suturing of the aponeurosis defect (n=108; 22.4%), and subgroup 2c — IPOM+ with open aponeurosis defect suturing (n=43; 8.9%). Follow‑up evaluations were carried out at intervals of 2 weeks, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year to assess the presence of complications, recurrence, and satisfaction with the cosmetic effect of the operation. Results. The overall frequency of complications after HP was 15.6%, while after open sublay it was 21.2%, and after laparoscopic IPOM it was 9.9%. All cases of complications belonged to Grades I—IIIb according to the Clavien‑Dindo classification. In both groups, there were no fatalities. In group 1, the frequency of seroma was 11.6% and hematoma was 5.6%, and in group 2, it was 7.3% and 0.9%, respectively. A statistically significant increase in the frequency of hematoma development was observed after open HP techniques compared to laparoscopic ones (p=0.004), while the frequency of seroma detection was comparable (p=0.148). Non‑suturing of the aponeurosis defect after laparoscopic IPOM in patients with VH did not result in an increase in the total number of complications or the percentage of recurrence (p &gt;0.05). Laparoscopic IPOM with hernia suturing demonstrated significantly higher patient satisfaction with the appearance of the anterior abdominal wall compared to other HP techniques (р &lt;0.05). Conclusions. The open sublay and laparoscopic IPOM HP procedures have a comparable recurrence rate of VH (p &gt;0.05). The incidence of infectious complications and hematomas is significantly higher after open operations compared to laparoscopic ones (p=0.041 and p=0.004, respectively).

Laparoscopic redo surgery for sigmoid volvulus following laparoscopic sigmoidectomy

BackgroundSigmoid volvulus (SV) is an acute abdominal condition characterized by torsion of the sigmoid colon around the mesentery, and often results in intestinal obstruction that may progress to bowel ischemia, necrosis, or perforation. Although SV commonly occurs due to predisposing factors like anatomic variations, age-related motility disorders, chronic constipation, and neurologic diseases, its incidence following sigmoid colon cancer surgery has rarely been reported. Herein, we report a rare case of recurrent SV following laparoscopic sigmoidectomy, which was successfully treated by laparoscopic redo surgery.Case presentationThe patient was a 77-year-old man who had previously undergone laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. Sixteen months postoperatively, he developed an incisional hernia at the umbilical site, which was treated with a laparoscopic repair using an intraperitoneal onlay mesh. After the hernia surgery, the patient had no anastomotic leakage or stenosis on regular follow-ups. However, 65 months after the first surgery, he presented with abdominal pain and distension. A computed tomography revealed that the remnant sigmoid colon was distended in a twisting manner around the anastomosis, leading to the diagnosis of SV. Although endoscopic de-torsion was successful, the SV recurred 2 months later, requiring elective laparoscopic redo surgery. The procedure involved resection of the sigmoid colon including the prior anastomosis with a left pararectal incision and DST re-anastomosis using a 25-mm circular stapler. The operation lasted 165 min with minimal bleeding and no complications. The postoperative course was uneventful. Pathological analysis confirmed fibrosis without malignancy. The patient remains well without recurrence of SV and anastomotic stenosis more than 5 years after surgery.ConclusionSV following sigmoid colon cancer surgery has rarely been reported. This case illustrates the potential need for prophylaxis against postoperative SV, especially in patients with long sigmoid colon undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Further, laparoscopic redo surgery following initial laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer can be performed with minimal invasiveness, especially if patient selection is properly managed.