One-week Triple Therapy Research Articles

Great Debate: Triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing coronary stenting should be limited to 1 week

Key points in favour or against the use of one-week triple antithrombotic therapy for the majority of patients with AF and ACS/PCI. Abbreviations: TT, triple antithrombotic therapy; OAC, oral anticoagulant; DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; RCT, randomised controlled trials; ACS, acute coronary syndrome; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.

Miocamycin‐Containing Triple Therapy for H. pylori Infection

In Northern Sardinia, one-week triple standard therapies containing a proton-pump inhibitor and two antibiotics for H.pylori infection have an average cure rate of 57% largely due to a high prevalence of antimicrobial resistance. The efficacy of miocamycin-containing treatment for 10days was evaluated. Patients referred to the endoscopy service for dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled. H. pylori infection was defined as a positive rapid urease test, presence of the bacteria on gastric biopsies, and a positive 13C-UBT. Treatment consisted of 10days with omeprazole 20mg, miocamycin water-soluble 900mg, and tinidazole 500mg all bid. Success was evaluated 40-50days after the end of therapy and defined by a negative 13C-UBT. Compliance was considered good if at least 90% of the total number of the pills were taken. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique was applied on paraffin-embedded gastric tissue sections to test susceptibility to clarithromycin of the bacteria. 50 patients were enrolled (mean age; 52, 36% men). Miocamycin-containing therapy cured 86% (42/49; 95% CI=72-94%) of infected patients by PP analysis. Susceptibility data (FISH) was available for 38 patients. Cure rates for the 28 with clarithromycin-susceptible infection was 96% vs 50% for those with resistant or mixed infection, (p=.003). Good compliance was recorded in 48 patients. None of the patients discontinued therapy. Miocamycin appears to be a valid alternative for clarithromycin for H.pylori eradication. Head-to-head studies will be needed to ascertain whether it is superior.

Is there still a role for empiric first‐line triple therapy using proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori infection in Singapore? Results of a time trend analysis

This study was aimed to assess whether the efficacy of one-week triple therapy comprising of proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (PPI/A/C) on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in Singapore has decreased over the duration from 2005 to 2010. The clinical data of H. pylori-positive patients treated with one-week PPI/A/C in 2005 and 2010 were reviewed retrospectively using a registry database. The primary endpoint was the difference in treatment success rate. A total of 465 patients (n = 174 in 2005 and n = 291 in 2010) were analyzed. In 2010, compared with 2005, the mean age of patients was younger (47 vs 56 years, P < 0.001) and the proportion of foreigners was higher (19.9% vs 5.7%, P < 0.001). The success rate of H. pylori eradication remained similar over the two time periods (90.2% in 2005 vs 88.7% in 2010, P = 0.597). Multinomial logistic regression revealed that mean age, gender, diagnosis and nationality had no impact on the success of H. pylori eradication. From 2005 to 2010, there was no significant decrease in the efficacy of one-week PPI/A/C for the treatment of H. pylori infection. This treatment regime remained an effective first-line therapy for H. pylori infection in Singapore.

Pseudomembranous colitis associated with a triple therapy forHelicobacter pylorieradication

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is one of the most common chronic bacterial infections in humans, affecting half of world's population. Therapy for H. pylori infection has proven to be both effective and safe. The one-week triple therapy including proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin or metronidazole is still recommended as a first-line treatment to eradicate H. pylori infection in countries with low clarithromycin resistance. Generally, this therapy is well-tolerated, with only a few and usually minor side effects. However, rare but severe adverse effects such as pseudomembranous colitis have been reported, Clostridium difficile (C. difficile) infection being the main causative factor in all cases. We report the cases of two women who developed pseudomembranous colitis after a 1-wk triple therapy consisting of pantoprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, and amoxicillin 1 g bid to eradicate H. pylori infection. A limited colonoscopy showed typical appearance of pseudomembranous colitis, and the stool test for C. difficile toxins was positive. Rapid resolution of symptoms and negative C. difficile toxins were obtained in both patients with oral vancomycin. No relapse occurred during a four and eleven-month, respectively, follow up. These cases suggest that physicians should have a high index of suspicion for pseudomembranous colitis when evaluate patients with diarrhea following H. pylori eradication therapy.

The efficacy of a 1-week triple therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in children

Background and study aims Poor compliance to therapy and antibiotic resistance are the main causes for failure of anti- Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori) therapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of omeprazole-based triple therapy in Iranian children. Patients and methods Fifty-seven children with H. pylori-related gastroduodenal disease received 1-week triple therapy with a combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin (according to the susceptibility test). Success of eradication was assessed by 13C-urea breath test and endoscopy. Results Sixty-four patients (mean age 11.3 years; range 2.7–16 years) were included. Eradication was successful in 84.2% (95% confidence interval, 72.8% intention to treat). Conclusion One-week triple therapy was effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection in children.

Antibiotics-associated Diarrhea and Other Gastrointestinal Abnormal Responses RegardingHelicobacter pyloriEradication

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is closely related with a wide range of gastrointestinal disease. One-week triple therapy is currently considered as the golden standard for the treatment of H. pylori infection. However, gastrointestinal abnormal responses are major pitfalls in such regimen. The aim of this study was to identify symptoms, frequency and severity of antibiotics-associated gastrointestinal abnormal responses during H. pylori eradication therapy. Sixty-seven patients with H. pylori infection between September 2005 and March 2006 were included. After 1 week of H. pylori eradication triple therapy (rabeprazol 10 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1 g bid), we evaluated gastrointestinal abnormal responses (diarrhea, bloating, constipation, abdominal pain, borborygmus, flatulence, stool frequency, belching, and nausea) and severities every week for 4 weeks. The incidence of diarrhea was the highest in week 1, which was 41.28% (n=28) and the lowest in week 4, which was 9.52% (n=6) and decreased from week 1 to week 4 with statistical significance (p<0.0001). The most common gastrointestinal abnormal responses were associated with flatulence in week 1 (n=21, 31.34%), week 2 (n=21, 33.33%) and abdominal distention in week 3 (n=16, 25.40%), week 4 (n=15, 23.81%). Most of gastrointestinal abnormal responses were mild, and the most common symptom with higher than moderate grade was abdominal pain (n=4, 40.00%) in week 1. Alcohol consumption and coexisting medical illness were not associated with diarrhea (p=0.0852, 0.9009 respectively). H. pylori eradication therapy is commonly associated with antibiotics-associated gastrointestinal abnormal responses, which may result in antibiotics intolerance and H. pylori eradication failure. Even though those symptoms are not so severe, we have to consider the gastrointestinal abnormal responses associated with H. pylori eradication, especially diarrhea.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori in surgical practice: A randomised trial of triple versus quadruple therapy in a rural district general hospital

To compare a lansoprazole-based triple versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) eradication with emphasis on side effect profile, patient compliance and eradication rate at a rural district general hospital in Wales, United Kingdom. One hundred one patients with H pylori infection were included in the study. Patients were randomised to receive triple therapy comprising of lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxycillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg, all b.d. (LAC), or quadruple therapy comprising of lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.d., and tetracycline chloride 500 mg q.d.s. (LMBT). Cure was defined as a negative (13)C urea breath test 2 mo after treatment. Seven patients were withdrawn after randomisation. Fifty patients were assigned to LAC group and 44 to LMBT group. The intention-to-treat cure rates were 92% and 91%, whereas the per-protocol cure rates were 92% and 97%, respectively. Side effects were common, with 56% experiencing moderate to severe symptoms in the LAC group and 59% in the LMBT group. Symptoms of vomiting, diarrhoea and black stools were significantly more common in the LMBT group. Patient compliance was 100% for triple therapy and 86% for quadruple therapy (P < 0.01). One-third of patients in both groups were still taking acid-reducing medications at six-month follow-up. One-week triple and quadruple therapies have similar intention-to-treat eradication rates. Certain side effects are more common with quadruple therapy, which can compromise patient compliance. Patient education or modifications to the regimen are alternative options to improve compliance of the quadruple regimen.

A Better Cure Rate with 800 mg than with 400 mg Clarithromycin Regimens in One-Week Triple Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Infection in Cigarette-Smoking Peptic Ulcer Patients

Background/Aims: In Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, using a proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin (PPI/AC regimen), the impact of the clarithromycin dose and smoking on efficacy is conflicting. Here, we compared the efficacy of 400 and 800 mg of clarithromycin in the regimen in relation to smoking in patients with peptic ulcer disease. Methods: We studied 601 H. pylori-positive patients with peptic ulcer disease who had received amoxicillin 750 mg and clarithromycin 200 or 400 mg together with lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. Results: 305 patients were treated with a regimen containing 400 mg of clarithromycin (C400 group), and 296 patients with a regimen containing 800 mg (C800 group). Overall cure rates between the two groups were not significantly different, but the cure rate in the C800 group was significantly better than that in the C400 group among patients infected with clarithromycin-sensitive strains (p = 0.03). This difference could be attributed to differences among smokers versus non-smokers: the cure rate among smokers in the C800 group (91.0%) was better than that in the C400 group (80.0%, p = 0.003). Conclusions: 800 mg of clarithromycin is recommended in the PPI/AC regimen for patients who smoke and are infected with clarithromycin-sensitive H. pylori.

Helicobacter pylorieradication for the treatment of dyspeptic symptoms in chronic renal failure

From Clinical Hospital Split, *Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, †Department of Nephrology, ‡Department of Pathology, §Department of Microbiology, Split, CroatiaCorrespondence:Prof. Izet Hozo MD, PhDDepartment of Internal Medicine,Clinical Hospital Split, Soltanska 1, Split, CroatiaTel: 385-21-55-76-58Fax: 385-21-55-76-58Izet.Hozo@st.htnet.hrAccepted for publicationNovember 2004

Efficacy of omeprazole and amoxicillin with either clarithromycin or metronidazole on eradication ofHelicobacter pyloriin Chinese peptic ulcer patients

One-week triple therapy with proton pump inhibitors, clarithromycin and amoxicillin has recently been proposed as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection; however, data regarding the effects of this regimen in China are scarce. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the efficacy of clarithromycin and metronidazole when they were combined with omeprazole and amoxicillin on eradication of H. pylori and ulcer healing in Chinese peptic ulcer patients. A total of 103 subjects with H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer were randomly divided into two groups, and accepted triple therapy with omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and either clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC group, n = 58) or metronidazole 400 mg (OAM group, n = 45). All drugs were given twice daily for 7 d. Patients with active peptic ulcer were treated with omeprazole 20 mg daily for 2-4 wk after anti-H. pylori therapy. Six to eight weeks after omeprazole therapy, all patients underwent endoscopies and four biopsies (two from the antrum and two others from the corpus of stomach) were taken for rapid urease test and histological analysis (with modified Giemsa staining) to examine H. pylori. Successful eradication was defined as negative results from both examination methods. One hundred patients completed the entire course of therapy and returned for follow-up. The eradication rate of H. pylori for the per-protocol analysis was 89.3% (50/56) in OAC group and 84.1% (37/44) in OAM group. Based on the intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate of H. pylori was 86.2% (50/58) in OAC group and 82.2% (37/45) in OAM group. There were no significant differences in eradication rates between the two groups on either analysis. The active ulcer-healing rate was 96.7% (29/30) in OAC group and 100% (21/21) in OAM group (per-protocol analysis, P>0.05). Six patients in OAC group (10.3%) and five in OAM group (11.1%) reported adverse events (P>0.05). One-week triple therapy with omeprazole and amoxicillin in combination with either clarithromycin or metronidazole is effective for the eradication of H. pylori. The therapeutic regimen comprising metronidazole with low cost, good compliance and mild adverse events may offer a good choice for the treatment of peptic ulcers associated with H. pylori infection in China.

Response of blood endothelin-1 and nitric oxide activity in duodenal ulcer patients undergoingHelicobacter pylorieradication

To investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on endothelin-1 (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NO) in duodenal ulcer (DU) patients. Sixty-six H pylori-infected active DU patients were consecutively enrolled to receive one-week triple therapy (rabeprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole) and then one-month rabeprazole therapy. They were asked back to determine ulcer and H pylori status using endoscopy one month later. Thirty-seven healthy controls (H pylori +/-: 17/20) were enrolled for comparison. Blood samples were collected in each visit to measure plasma ET-1 and nitrate/nitrite levels using an enzyme immunoassay kit. Sixty DU patients finished trial per protocol. The ulcer healing and H pylori-eradication rates were 86.7% and 83.3%, respectively. Plasma ET-1 level in DU patients was higher than that of H pylori-negative and positive controls (3.59+/-0.96 vs 0.89+/-0.54 vs 0.3+/-0.2 pg/mL, P<0.01), while nitrate/nitrite levels among them were also significantly different (8.55+/-0.71 vs 5.27+/-0.68 vs 6.39+/-0.92 mumol/L, P<0.05). H pylori eradication diminished ET-1 levels (3.64+/-0.55 vs 2.64+/-0.55 pg/mL, P<0.01) but elevated nitrate/nitrite level (8.16+/-0.84 vs 11.41+/-1.42 mumol/L, P<0.05). Both plasma ET-1 and nitrate/nitrite levels increase in active DU patients. After an effective H pylori eradication, DU healing is associated with diminished blood ET-1 level and elevated nitrate/nitrite level.

The diagnostic value of endoscopy and Helicobacter pylori tests for peptic ulcer patients in late post-treatment setting

BackgroundGuidelines for management of peptic ulcer patients after the treatment are largely directed to detection of H. pylori infection using only non-invasive tests. We compared the diagnostic value of non-invasive and endoscopy based H. pylori tests in a late post-treatment setting.MethodsAltogether 34 patients with dyspeptic complaints were referred for gastroscopy 5 years after the treatment of peptic ulcer using a one-week triple therapy scheme. The endoscopic and histologic findings were evaluated according to the Sydney classification. Bacteriological, PCR and cytological investigations and 13C-UBT tests were performed.ResultsSeventeen patients were defined H. pylori positive by 13C-UBT test, PCR and histological examination. On endoscopy, peptic ulcer persisted in 4 H. pylori positive cases. Among the 6 cases with erosions of the gastric mucosa, only two patients were H. pylori positive. Mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia were revealed both in the H. pylori positive and H. pylori negative cases. Bacteriological examination revealed three clarithromycin resistant H. pylori strains. Cytology failed to prove validity for diagnosing H. pylori in a post-treatment setting.ConclusionsIn a late post-treatment setting, patients with dyspepsia should not be monitored only by non-invasive investigation methods; it is also justified to use the classical histological evaluation of H. pylori colonisation, PCR and bacteriology as they have shown good concordance with 13C-UBT. Moreover, endoscopy and histological investigation of a gastric biopsy have proved to be the methods with an additional diagnostic value, providing the physician with information about inflammatory, atrophic and metaplastic lesions of the stomach in dyspeptic H. pylori positive and negative patients. Bacteriological methods are suggested for detecting the putative antimicrobial resistance of H. pylori, aimed at successful eradication of infection in persistent peptic ulcer cases.

P0547 ESOMEPRAZOLE BASED TRIPLE THERAPY DIRECTED BY ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTING FOR ERADICATION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION

Introduction: It has been recommended to perform antibiotic susceptibility testing prior to first therapy in symptomatic children with H. pylori infection. Between 6/1998 and 12/2000 we used omeprazole-based one-week triple therapy with amoxicillin (AMO) and clarithromycin (CLA) or metronidazole (MET) directed by antibiogram. Intention-to-treat analysis in 46 children revealed an eradication rate of 87% after exclusion of patients with double resistant strains. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of esomeprazole (ESO) based therapy for eradication of H. pylori in children directed by antibiogram. Methods: Between 12/2000 and 7/2003 symptomatic children with a culture proven H. pylori infection and successful antibiogram were considered for inclusion. Patients with a strain resistant to both, MET and CLA, a previous H. pylori therapy or without informed consent of the parents were excluded. The daily dose was adapted to body weight: ESO (10 – 20 mg bid) AMO (500 – 1000 mg bid), CLA (250 – 500 mg bid). MET (200 – 400 mg bid) was given instead of CLA in five cases harbouring a CLA resistant strain. Six weeks later success of eradication was investigated by 13UBT. Adverse events were assessed during therapy by a symptom diary. Results: Fifty-eight children with median age of 11.4 years (range 2.2–17.7 years, 61% female, 60% immigrants) were included. In five patients (9%) H. pylori was resistant to CLA, in 9 (16%) to MET. Eradication was successful in 49 of 53 (92%) children receiving ESO, AMO, CLA and in all five children treated with MET instead of CLA, resulting in an overall eradication rate of 93% (intention-to-treat analysis, 95% CI: 0.86–0.95). No serious adverse events were observed. All four treatment failures occurred in immigrants with major language problems, two of them were obviously non-compliant. Conclusion: We conclude that esomeprazole-based one-week triple therapy directed by antibiogram is highly effective for eradication of H. pylori infection in children.

The prolongation of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori does not allow reaching therapeutic outcome of sequential scheme: a prospective, randomised study

Background and aim. One-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori revealed, during these last few years, a decrease in the eradication rate, so that the prolongation of its duration has been proposed. A sequential scheme recently showed very satisfactory results. We performed a prospective randomised study with the aim of either evaluating whether the triple therapy prolongation may improve its effectiveness and comparing its outcome with that of sequential regimen. Patients and methods. Three hundred and forty-two H. pylori positive patients completed the study. They were randomised to receive one of the following treatments: (i) a 7-day triple therapy comprising of rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.) plus clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.) and amoxycillin (1 g, b.i.d.); (ii) a 10-day triple therapy comprising the same scheme; (iii) a 10-day sequential regimen comprising of rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.) plus amoxycillin (1 g, b.i.d.) for 5 days followed by rabeprazole (20 mg, b.i.d.) plus clarithromycin (500 mg, b.i.d.) and tinidazole (500 mg, b.i.d.) for the next 5 days. Therapeutic results were expressed using both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses with 95% confidence intervals. A model of multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed using therapeutic outcome as a dependent variable and including endoscopic finding, smoking habit, age and sex as candidates for the model. Results. Sequential regimen showed a significant gain in the eradication rate as compared to the 7-day ( P<0.0001) and the 10-day ( P<0.01) triple therapies, respectively. Overall eradication was lower in smokers than in non-smokers, but the difference remained significant only in the 7-day triple therapy ( P<0.01). Additionally, the overall eradication was higher in peptic ulcer than dyspepsia ( P<0.01), even if this difference was significant only for both triple therapies. Conclusions. Seven-day triple therapy achieves disappointing eradication rates in dyspeptics and smokers. Prolonging triple therapy to 10 days does not significantly improve the eradication rate. The novel 10-day sequential regimen is more effective and equally tolerated than the 10-day triple therapy.

High-dose Versus Low-dose Clarithromycin in 1-week Triple Therapy, Including Rabeprazole and Levofloxacin, for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

To compare high-dose versus low-dose clarithromycin in 1-week triple therapy including rabeprazole and levofloxacin. Regimens containing rabeprazole and levofloxacin have proved to be effective against H. pylori infection. One-hundred H. pylori-positive patients were randomly assigned to one of the following 1-week regimens: rabeprazole 20 mg o.d. plus levofloxacin 500 mg o.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (RLC-1 group); rabeprazole 20 mg o.d. plus levofloxacin 500 mg o.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (RLC-2 group). H. pylori status was assessed at entry and after the treatment. Patients who experienced treatment failure underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing. Forty-two patients in RLC-1 group (both PP and ITT analysis: 84%; 95%CI: 71-93%) and 47 in RLC2 group (both PP and ITT analysis: 94%; 95% CI: 83-98%) became H. pylori negative. Clarithromycin resistance was detected in all of 8 (100%) RLC-1 failures and in 1 out of 3 (33%) RLC-2 failures. Side effects occurred in 8% of patients in RLC-1 group and in 12% in RLC-2. Regimens tested are competitive with other PPI-based treatments. One-week triple therapy containing rabeprazole plus, levofloxacin, and high-dose clarithromycin yielded a higher eradicating rate than the one containing low-dose clarithromycin and may be considered as a first-line therapy option.

Clinical evaluation of four one-week triple therapy regimens in eradicatingHelicobacter pyloriinfection

To evaluate clinical efficacy of four one-week triple therapies in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection. In this clinical trial, 132 patients with duodenal ulcer and chronic gastritis were randomly divided into four groups, and received treatment with OAC (omeprazole 20 mg + amoxicillin 1 000 mg + clarithromycin 250 mg), OFC (omeprazole 20 mg + furazolidone 100 mg + clarithromycin 250 mg), OFA (omeprazole 20 mg + furazolidone 100 mg + amoxicillin 1 000 mg) and OMC (omeprazole 20 mg + metronidazole 200 mg + clarithromycin 250 mg), respectively. Each drug was taken twice daily for one week. The (13)C urea breath test was carried out 4-8 weeks after treatment to determine the success of H pylori eradication. A total of 127 patients completed the treatment. The eradication rate for H pylori infection was 90.3%, 90.9%, 70.9% and 65.6%, respectively in OAC, OFC OMC and OFA groups. A high eradication rate can be achieved with one-week OAC or OFC triple therapy. Thus, one-week triple therapies with OAC and OFC are recommended for Chinese patients with duodenal ulcers and chronic gastritis.

One-week triple therapy with esomeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is highly effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori in the absence of antimicrobial resistanceȁa prospective randomized multicenter trial

One-week triple therapy with esomeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is highly effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori in the absence of antimicrobial resistanceȁa prospective randomized multicenter trial

Current consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori-associated gastroduodenal disease.

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a spiral shaped bacterium that resides in the stomach mucosa. Isolation of H. pylori from the stomach mucosa changed the erstwhile widely held belief that the stomach contains no bacteria and is actually sterile. Once H. pylori is safely ensconced in the mucus, it is able to neutralize the acid in the stomach by elaborating an enzyme called urease. Urease converts urea, of which there is an abundant supply in the stomach (derived from saliva and the gastric juice), into bicarbonate and ammonia, which are strong bases. These bases form a cloud of acid-neutralizing chemicals in the vicinity of the organisms, protecting them from the acid in the stomach. This urea hydrolysis reaction is utilized for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in the urea breath test (UBT) and the rapid urease test (RUT). In Japan, both invasive tests, such as bacterial culture, histopathology and RUT, and non-invasive tests such as UBT and serology are conducted for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. For confirming the results of eradication therapy, UBT is considered to be the most sensitive and specific. In order to treat H. pylori infection, a new one-week triple therapy regimen (lansoprazole or omeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin) has been approved for use in patients with peptic ulcer disease in Japan. As for H. pylori eradication in the case of other diseases in which the bacterium has been implicated (e.g., chronic atrophic gastritis, gastric MALT lymphoma, gastric cancer, non-ulcer dyspepsia, chronic urticaria, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)), further basic and clinical investigation is required.

Helicobacter pylori Infection Affects Eosinophilic Cationic Protein in the Gastric Juice of Patients with Idiopathic Chronic Urticaria

Background:Helicobacter pylori, the main cause of gastritis and peptic ulcer, has been associated with idiopathic chronic urticaria (ICU), an immunological skin disorder of unknown origin. Eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) is a cytotoxic molecule secreted by the activated eosinophils involved in the pathogenesis of ICU. We assessed serum/gastric juice ECP levels and gastric mucosal eosinophil infiltration in ICU patients infected or not with H. pylori and evaluated the modification after bacterium eradication. Methods: 33 patients with ICU and 25 dyspeptic controls underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for histological evaluation and assessment of H. pylori infection. One-week triple therapy was given to H. pylori-positive patients. Serum and gastric juice ECP levels, eosinophil infiltration from gastric mucosal sections and urticaria symptoms were evaluated in all patients at enrolment and 8 weeks after eradication. Results: 19 of 33 (57%) ICU patients and 16 of 25 (64%) controls were found to be infected with H. pylori. Serum ECP was significantly higher in ICU patients compared to controls, regardless of infectious status. Gastric juice ECP and gastric eosinophil infiltration were significantly higher in infected ICU patients when compared both to uninfected ICU patients and controls. H. pylori eradication determined a significant decrease in gastric juice ECP and gastric eosinophil infiltration only in ICU patients. Moreover, a total or partial remission of urticaria symptoms was observed only in ICU patients in whom the bacterium was eradicated. Conclusions: Although H. pylori infection affects gastric juice ECP and eosinophil infiltration of ICU patients, the role of the bacterium in the pathogenesis of this skin disorder still remains uncertain.

Effects of different PPIs, genetic difference in CYP2C19 status and antibiotic susceptibility patterns on the cure rate of H. pylori infection by one-week triple therapy: Results of a radomized trial in Japan

Effects of different PPIs, genetic difference in CYP2C19 status and antibiotic susceptibility patterns on the cure rate of H. pylori infection by one-week triple therapy: Results of a radomized trial in Japan