Oncological Outcomes In Patients Research Articles

Comparison of oncological and functional results of robotic and open perineal radical prostatectomy.

We aimed to compare the functional and oncological outcomes of patients who underwent open perineal radical prostatectomy (OPP) and robotic perineal radical prostatectomy (RPP) for prostate cancer (PCa). The data of patients who underwent OPP and RPP from June 2016 to February 2019 due to localized PCa were analyzed. Demographic characteristics, perioperative data and oncological results of the patients were recorded. In addition, the incontinence status of the patients immediately after catheter removal and at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were compared. Potency status was evaluated among the patients with preoperative potency, and 12th month potency status was compared. A total of 135 patients were included, of whom 58 (43%) were in the OPP group and 77 (57%) were in the RPP group. The operation time was statistically significantly shorter in the OPP group (83.90 ± 15.48 vs. 110.88 ± 28.10 min, p = 0.001). The amount of bleeding was significantly lower in the RPP group (59.51 ± 22.04 vs. 74.06 ± 17.66, p = 0.002). The continence rates evaluated at the early period, 3rd, 6th, and 12th months were 40.3%, 80.5%, 87.0%, and 90.9%, respectively, for the RPP group and 36.2%, 70.7%, 86.2%, and 89.7%, for the OPP group, indicating no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the 12th month rates of postoperative potency according to the surgical technique (p > 0.05). Although differences were observed between the OPP and RPP techniques in terms of perioperative parameters, oncological and functional results were similar.

Radiologic Occult Metastases in Pancreatic Cancer: Analysis of Risk Factors and Survival Outcomes in the Age of Contemporary Neoadjuvant Multi-agent Chemotherapy.

Radiologic occult metastatic disease (ROMD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who undergo contemporary neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been well studied. This study sought to analyze the incidence, risk factors, and oncologic outcomes for patients who underwent the NAC approach for PDAC. A retrospective review analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who had potentially resectable PDAC treated with NAC and were offered pancreatectomy at our institution from 2011 to 2022. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with ROMD. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank analyses were generated to estimate time-to-event end points. The study enrolled 366 patients. Upfront and borderline resectable anatomic staging comprised 80% of the cohort, whereas 20% had locally advanced disease. The most common NAC regimen was FOLFIRINOX (n = 274, 75%). For 55 patients (15%) who harbored ROMD, the most common site was liver-only metastases (n = 33, 60%). The independent risk factors for ROMD were increasing CA19-9 levels during NAC (odds ratio [OR], 7.01; confidence interval [CI], 1.97-24.96; p = 0.008), indeterminate liver lesions (OR, 2.19; CI, 1.09-4.39; p = 0.028), and enlarged para-aortic lymph nodes (OR, 6.87; CI, 2.07-22.74; p = 0.002) on preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Receipt of palliative chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and eventual formal pancreatectomy (p = 0.04) were associated with survival benefit in the log-rank analysis. The median overall survival (OS) of the patients with ROMD was nearly 15 months from the initial diagnosis, with radiologic evidence of metastases occurring after a median of 2 months. Radiologic occult metastatic disease remains a clinical challenge associated with poor outcomes for patients who have PDAC treated with multi-agent NAC.

Body Composition in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Immunotherapy

The association between body composition (BC) and cancer outcomes is complex and incompletely understood. Previous research in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been limited to small, single-institution studies and yielded promising, albeit heterogeneous, results. To evaluate the association of BC with oncologic outcomes in patients receiving immunotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. This comprehensive multicohort analysis included clinical data from cohorts receiving treatment at the Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (DFBCC) who received immunotherapy given alone or in combination with chemotherapy and prospectively collected data from the phase 1/2 Study 1108 and the chemotherapy arm of the phase 3 MYSTIC trial. Baseline and follow-up computed tomography (CT) scans were collected and analyzed using deep neural networks for automatic L3 slice selection and body compartment segmentation (skeletal muscle [SM], subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT], and visceral adipose tissue). Outcomes were compared based on baseline BC measures or their change at the first follow-up scan. The data were analyzed between July 2022 and April 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of BC measurements with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 1791 patients (878 women [49%]) with NSCLC were analyzed, of whom 487 (27.2%) received chemoimmunotherapy at DFBCC (DFBCC-CIO), 825 (46.1%) received ICI monotherapy at DFBCC (DFBCC-IO), 222 (12.4%) were treated with durvalumab monotherapy on Study 1108, and 257 (14.3%) were treated with chemotherapy on MYSTIC; median (IQR) ages were 65 (58-74), 66 (57-71), 65 (26-87), and 63 (30-84) years, respectively. A loss in SM mass, as indicated by a change in the L3 SM area, was associated with worse oncologic outcome across patient groups (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43-0.81] and 0.61 [95% CI, 0.47-0.79] for OS and PFS, respectively, in DFBCC-CIO; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91] for OS in DFBCC-IO; HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.33-0.64] and 0.47 [95% CI, 0.34-0.64] for OS and PFS, respectively, in Study 1108; HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61-0.96] for PFS in the MYSTIC trial). This association was most prominent among male patients, with a nonsignificant association among female patients in the MYSTIC trial and DFBCC-CIO cohorts on Kaplan-Meier analysis. An increase of more than 5% in SAT density, as quantified by the average CT attenuation in Hounsfield units of the SAT compartment, was associated with poorer OS in 3 patient cohorts (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.43-0.86] for DFBCC-CIO; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.49-0.79] for DFBCC-IO; and HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.40-0.77] for Study 1108). The change in SAT density was also associated with PFS for DFBCC-CIO (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.97). This was primarily observed in female patients on Kaplan-Meier analysis. The results of this multicohort study suggest that loss in SM mass during systemic therapy for NSCLC is a marker of poor outcomes, especially in male patients. SAT density changes are also associated with prognosis, particularly in female patients. Automated CT-derived BC measurements should be considered in determining NSCLC prognosis.

The impact of purified protein derivative prior to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin for the treatment of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of the intradermal injection of purified protein derivative (PPD) and PPD skin test reactions on the oncological outcomes of patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) treated by trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) and adjuvant intravesical BCG. The study included 100 consecutive patients with NMIBC prospectively given intradermal PPD 1-2 weeks before starting BCG therapy. Another 100 patients with NMIBC not given intradermal PPD before starting BCG were chosen as a historical control. The control group was chosen to be matching with the study group regarding baseline characteristics. The study group was divided into 2 subgroups with positive and negative reaction to PPD skin test. Oncological outcomes, immunological markers (TNF-α and IL-6) changes and BCG side effects were evaluated. There were no significant differences between patients who received PPD or not regarding the 2-year recurrence free survival (RFS) rates and progression-free survival (PFS) rates and immunological markers changes. The 2-year RFS and PFS rates were significantly higher in patients with positive reactions. Post-induction values of immunological markers increased in all patients with a significant increase in patients with positive reactions. BCG side effects were significantly higher in patients with positive reactions. The intradermal injection of PPD before intravesical BCG has no impact on oncological outcomes of patients with NMIBC treated with TURBT and intravesical BCG. However, the PPD skin test reactions before BCG therapy can predict the oncological outcomes, BCG side effects and the immunological outcomes of patients.

Liver Resection in Synchronous Bilobar versus Unilobar Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Analysis of Oncological Outcomes and Patient Survival

Introduction: Resection of colorectal liver metastasis has emerged as the standard treatment. Our study compares oncological outcomes of patients with resected synchronous bilobar versus unilobar colorectal liver metastasis. Methods: This retrospective study presents long-term follow-up data of 105 consecutive patients with primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastasis. All patients underwent primary tumor and metastasis resections between 2007 and 2019. Results: Fifty-five patients with bilobar and 50 patients with unilobar colorectal liver metastases were included. No significant difference in overall, tumor-specific, or recurrence-free survival was observed between patients with bilobar and unilobar metastases. After case-control matching, the results were confirmed in patients with similar tumor burdens. In the multivariate analysis, chemotherapy following liver metastasis resection was a significant prognostic factor associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio 0.518, 95% confidence interval: 0.302–0.888, p = 0.017). Conclusion: Overall survival, as well as tumor-specific and recurrence-free survival, did not differ between patients with unilobar and bilobar liver metastasis. These findings contribute to the understanding that primary tumor and metastasis resection in eligible patients improve long-term outcomes.

Abstract PO3-02-11: Impact of Tumor Volume on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with T1 Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract Backgrounds: Measuring the extent of tumor cell accretion in the primary organ typically involves assessing the longest diameter, an important component of the widely employed TNM staging system. The largest tumor diameter is considered indicative of the risk of cancer metastasis and the likelihood of distant recurrences. However, relying solely on the unidimensional diameter to determine the degree of cancer cell accretion can be inadequate since each tumor has a unique three-dimensional shape, thus leading to different tumor volumes. Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of tumor volume on oncologic outcomes in patients with T1-2 breast cancer. Method: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 1,018 patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from 2010 to 2015. Patients with multiple tumors, positive margins leading to mastectomy, or those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Tumor volume was defined as the product of the length of the three axes to simplify the calculation. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Result: The median value for tumor volume was 7.502 cm³. Out of 1,018 patients, 124 patients exhibited tumor volumes greater than the median value. Higher tumor volume was associated with pathologic T stage (P &amp;lt; 0.001), pathologic N stage (P = 0.004), histologic grade (P &amp;lt; 0.001), and luminal B subtype (P = 0.008). In multivariable logistic regression analyses for recurrence, higher tumor volume (OR 3.532, 95% CI 1.708-7.303, P = 0.001), CEA elevation (OR 6.129, 95% CI 1.497-25.092, P = 0.012), pN stage (OR 2.038, 95% CI 1.005-4.132, P = 0.048), and luminal B subtype (OR 2.407, 95% CI 1.060-5.470, P = 0.036) were shown to be predictive factors for recurrence, while completion of radiation therapy (OR 0.142, 95% CI 0.050-0.402, P &amp;lt; 0.001) and completion of hormone therapy (OR 0.200, 95% CI 0.047-0.849, P = 0.029) were identified as protective factors. The 5-year RFS was significantly lower in patients with higher tumor volume compared to those with lower volume (97.4% vs. 91.9%; p &amp;lt; 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, tumor volume (HR 3.056, 95% CI 1.572-5.940, P = 0.001), CEA elevation (HR 4.934, 95% CI 1.437-16.935, P = 0.011), luminal B subtype (HR 2.336, 95% CI 1.076-5.073, P = 0.032), completion of RT (HR 0.131, 95% CI 0.053-0.325, P &amp;lt; 0.001), and completion of HTx (HR 0.199, 95% CI 0.060-0.655, P = 0.008) were identified as independent prognostic factors for RFS. Conclusion: In the current study, we showed higher tumor volume results in poorer oncologic outcomes in patients with T1-2 breast cancer. Therefore, the T stage based on tumor volume, which includes all three-dimensional measurements, can better predict the prognosis in breast cancer patients than the traditional T stage that is solely dependent on the unidimensional longest tumor diameter. Citation Format: Hyoung Won Koh, Eun-Kyu Kim, Hee-Chul Shin. Impact of Tumor Volume on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with T1 Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-02-11.

Abstract GS02-02: Are nodal ITCs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy an indication for axillary dissection? The OPBC05/EUBREAST-14R/ICARO study

Abstract GS02-02: Are nodal ITCs after neoadjuvant chemotherapy an indication for axillary dissection? The OPBC05/EUBREAST-14R/ICARO study

Impact of COVID-19 on Management and Outcomes of Oncology Patients: Results of MENA COVID-19 and Cancer Registry (MCCR).

Despite extensive studies of the impact of COVID-19 on patients with cancer, there is a dearth of information from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Our study aimed to report pertinent MENA COVID-19 and Cancer Registry (MCCR) findings on patient management and outcomes. MCCR was adapted from the American Society of Clinical Oncology COVID-19 Registry to collect data specifically from patients with cancer and SARS-CoV-2 infection from 12 centers in eight countries including Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Egypt, Algeria, United Arab Emirates, and Morocco. The Registry included data on patients and disease characteristics, treatment, and patient outcomes. Logistic regression was used to assess associations with mortality. Between November 29, 2020, and June 8, 2021, data were captured on 2008 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 from the beginning of the pandemic. Median age was 56 years (16-98), 56.4% were females, and 26% were current or ex-smokers. Breast cancer (28.5%) was the leading diagnosis and 50.5% had metastatic disease. Delays of planned treatment (>14 days) occurred in 80.3% for surgery, 48.8% for radiation therapy, and 32.9% for systemic therapy. Significant reduction in the delays of all three treatment modalities occurred after June 1, 2020. All-cause mortality rates at 30 and 90 days were 17.1% and 23.4%, respectively. All-cause mortality rates at 30 days did not change significantly after June 1, 2020; however, 90-day mortality increased from 33.4% to 42.9% before and after that date (p = 0.015). Multivariable regression analysis showed the following predictors of higher 30- and 90-day mortality: age older than 70 years, having metastatic disease, disease progression, and being off chemotherapy. Patients with cancer in the MENA region experienced similar risks and outcome of COVID-19 as reported in other populations. Although there were fewer treatment delays after June 1, 2020, 90-day mortality increased, which may be attributed to other risk factors such as disease progression or new patients who presented with more advanced disease.

Early experience with sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel for micropapillary variant non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

BackgroundGuidelines lack clear recommendations regarding conservative management of micropapillary (MP) variant non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Bladder-sparing therapy using intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) has been reported although there are concerns regarding recurrence and progression with this approach. Due to the ongoing BCG shortage, we have utilized sequential intravesical gemcitabine and docetaxel (Gem/Doce) as primary therapy for NMIBC, including some cases with limited MP urothelial carcinoma (MPUC). To compare oncologic outcomes of patients with non-muscle invasive MPUC and conventional UC treated with Gem/Doce. MethodsA secondary analysis of 138 patients with high-risk NMIBC treated with intravesical Gem/Doce from January 2011 to December 2021 was performed. Oncologic outcomes were compared in patients with or without MPUC using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsMedian follow-up (f/u) for all patients was 23 months (IQR 13–34). There were 129 patients with pure UC and 9 with MPUC. In those with MPUC, all were high-grade (HG), 8/9 were stage T1, 7/9 had a focal MP component (extent < 10%), 3/9 had concomitant CIS, and 2/9 had lymphovascular invasion. All MPUC tumors were re-resected, and 4 had T0, 3 had T1 HG, 1 had Ta HG, 1 had carcinoma in situ (CIS); none had residual MP or LVI tumors before Gem/Doce treatment. The 24-month high-grade recurrence-free survival was 89% and 80% in patients with MPUC and pure UC, respectively. Survival outcomes did not significantly differ between patients with and without MPUC. Four patients with MPUC experienced recurrent NMIBC after Gem/Doce, and all were treated successfully with rescue sequential intravesical valrubicin and docetaxel (Val/Doce). Pathology of these four recurrent patients revealed more aggressive histologic features in the original tumor including: multifocal tumor (3/4), T1 HG disease (4/4), concomitant CIS (2/4), and moderate MP variant extent (30%) (1/4). No patient with MPUC underwent cystectomy, experienced progression, or died at last follow-up (median f/u of 43 months). ConclusionsGem/Doce with Val/Doce rescue appears to have activity against carefully selected non-muscle invasive MPUC with favorable histology. Larger prospective trials are needed to validate these results.

Transoral robotic surgery for supraglottic cancer. A review of oncological and functional outcomes compared to open surgery.

Supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) represents a major surgical challenge in organ-preserving treatment. Type I open partial horizontal laryngectomy (OPHL I) is considered the most popular. To date, minimally-invasive approaches such as laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have gained increasing relevance. The aim of this narrative review is to obtain a descriptive comparison of functional and oncological outcomes from studies on patients with supraglottic SCC treated with OPHL I and TORS, respectively. A computerised search was performed using the Pubmed database for articles published from 2000 to 2023. A comparative analysis on functional and oncological outcomes of patients treated by TORS and OPHL I was performed. The present narrative review shows a superiority of TORS compared to open surgery for supraglottic SCC in terms of functional outcomes, while maintaining comparable oncological outcomes. Although recently introduced in the treatment of laryngeal pathology, TORS has been shown to be a reliable technique not only for functional but also for oncological outcomes, ensuring good overall survival, disease-free survival, and disease control rates comparable to OPHL I.

First-line immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated network meta-analysis including triplet therapy.

To compare the differential efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combined therapies among patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), as recently, the efficacy of triplet therapy comprising nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib has been published. Three databases were searched in December 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with first-line ICI-based combined therapies. We performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs), in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC; we also assessed treatment-related adverse events. Overall, seven RCTs were included in the meta-analyses and NMAs. Treatment ranking analysis revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved PFS, followed by nivolumab + cabozantinib (79%), and nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib (77%). Notably, compared to nivolumab + cabozantinib, adding ipilimumab to nivolumab + cabozantinib did not improve PFS (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.43). Regarding ORRs, treatment ranking analysis also revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib had the highest likelihood of providing better ORRs (99.7%). The likelihoods of improved PFS and ORRs of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib were true in both International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Our analyses confirmed the robust efficacy of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib as first-line treatment for patients with intermediate or poor IMDC risk mRCC. Triplet therapy did not result in superior efficacy. Considering both toxicity and the lack of mature overall survival data, triplet therapy should only be considered in selected patients.

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy with cutaneous ureterostomies: a contemporary multicenter analysis.

Robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) offers decreased blood loss during surgery, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower risk for thromboembolic events without hindering oncological outcomes. Cutaneous ureterostomies (UCS) are a seldom utilized diversion that can be a suitable alternative for a selected group of patients with competing co-morbidities and limited life expectancy. To describe operative and perioperative characteristics as well as oncological outcomes for patients that underwent RARC + UCS. Patients that underwent RARC + UCS during 2013-2023in 3 centers (EU = 2,US = 1)were identified in aprospectively maintained database.Baseline characteristics, pathological, and oncological outcomes were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis were performed using R language version 4.3.1. Sixty-nine patients were included. The median age was 77years (IQR 70-80) and the median follow-up time was 11months (IQR 4-20). Ten patients were ASA 4 (14.5%). Nine patients underwent palliative cystectomy (13%). The median operation time was 241min (IQR 202-290), and the median hospital stay was 8days (IQR 6-11). The 30-day complication rate was 55.1% (grade ≥ 3a was 14.4%), and the 30-day readmission rate was 17.4%. Eleven patients developed metastatic recurrence (15.9%), and 14 patients (20.2%) died during the follow-up period. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24months was 84%, 81%, and 73%, respectively. RARC + UCS may offer lower complication and readmission rates without the need to perform enteric anastomosis, it can be considered in a selected group of patients with competing co-morbidities, or limited life expectancy. Larger prospective studies are necessary to validate these results.

Functional and oncological outcomes of patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy in skeletally immature patients. The proximal humerus is the third most common site of osteosarcoma. The literature shows a paucity of published data concerning the outcome of proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage. The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: (1) do patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma managed by limb salvage and neoadjuvant chemotherapy show good functional and oncological outcomes, and (2) are there any prognostic factors that are associated with better oncological and functional outcomes? The study was a retrospective case series study assessing the overall outcome of 34 patients with proximal humerus osteosarcoma. Eighteen patients were males (53%) while 16 were females. Biological reconstruction was done in 15 patients (44%), while nonbiological reconstruction was done in 19 patients. Resections were mainly intraarticular (82%). Functional outcome was assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, while oncological outcome was assessed based on local recurrence and development of chest metastasis. Comparisons between quantitative variables were done using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. To compare categorical data, the chi-square (χ2) test was performed. The exact test was used instead when the expected frequency was less than 5. Correlations between quantitative variables were examined using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The mean MSTS score was 25.5 (range 23-29). A younger age was statistically correlated with a poorer MSTS score (P = 0.0016). Six patients out of 34 (17.6%) had local recurrence and four of them (67%) were treated by forequarter amputation. 41% of patients developed chest metastasis, and the majority of them were treated by chemotherapy (71%). In comparison with patients with osteosarcoma at other sites who were also managed in our institution, proximal humerus osteosarcoma patients showed higher incidence rates of local recurrence and chest metastasis along with lower 5-year patient and limb survivorships compared to distal femur, proximal tibia and proximal femur osteosarcoma patients. Treatment of osteosarcoma of the proximal humerus by limb salvage and chemotherapy yields a good functional outcome. The method of reconstruction does not impact the resultant function. The 5-year survivorship of these patients is 65%. Younger patients have a better oncological outcome and an inferior functional outcome. Level IV therapeutic study.

The Oncological Stress Test of Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Systematic Review in Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Compared to Upfront Resection Approach for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, increasingly diagnosed in the United States, has a disheartening initial resection rate of 15%. Neoadjuvant therapy, particularly FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine-based regimens, is gaining favor for its potential to improve resectability rates and achieving microscopically negative margins (R0) in borderline resectable cases, marked by intricate arterial or venous involvement. Despite surgery being the sole curative approach, actual benefit of neoadjuvant therapy remains debatable. This study scrutinizes current literature on oncological outcomes post-resection of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to systematically compare oncological outcomes of patients treated with either neoadjuvant therapy with intent of curative resection or an "upfront resection" approach. A total of 1293 studies were initially screened and 30 were included (n = 1714) in this analysis. All studies included data on outcomes of patients with borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma being treated with neoadjuvant therapy (n = 1387) or a resection-first approach (n = 356). Patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy underwent resection 52% of the time, achieving negative margins of 43% (n = 601). Approximately 77% of patients who received an upfront resection underwent a successful resection, with 39% achieving negative margins. Neoadjuvant therapy remains marginally efficacious in treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, as patients undergo an operation and successful resection less often when treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Rates of curative resection are comparable, despite neoadjuvant therapy being a primary recommendation in borderline resectable cases and employed more often than upfront resection. Upfront resection may offer improved resection rates by intention-to-treat, which can provide more patients with paths to curative resection.

Long-Term Oncological Outcomes after Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center, Two-Arm Prospective Study.

To compare the oncological outcomes of patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer undergoing nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between November 2002 and December 2018, we prospectively recorded the data of patients undergoing RARP for high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa) at our tertiary referral center. NSS (nerve-sparing surgery) was carefully offered on the basis of the preoperative clinical characteristics of the patients and an intraoperative assessment. The patients were stratified into two groups: nerve-sparing and non-nerve-sparing groups (yes/no). Radical prostatectomies were performed by 10 surgeons with a robot-assisted technique using a daVinci® surgical system. The primary oncological outcome evaluated was biochemical recurrence (BCR). The secondary oncological outcomes assessed were positive surgical margins (PSMs) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). A total of 779 patients were included in the study: 429 (55.1%) underwent NSS while 350 (44.9%) underwent non-NSS. After a mean (±SD) follow-up of 192 (±14) months, 328 (42.1%) patients developed BCR; no significant difference was found between the NSS and non-NSS groups (156 vs. 172; p = 0.09). Both our univariable and multivariable analyses found that the nerve-sparing approach was not a predictor of BCR (p > 0.05). Kaplan-Mayer survival curves for BCR showed no significant difference among the non-NSS, unilateral NSS, and bilateral NSS groups (log rank test = 0.6). PSMs were reported after RARPs for 254 (32.6%) patients, with no significant difference between the NSS and non-NSS group (143 vs. 111; p = 0.5). In the subgroup of 15 patients who died during the follow-up period, mean (±SD) CSS was 70.5 (±26.1) months, with no significant difference between the NSS and non-NSS groups (mean CSS: 70.3 vs. 70.7 months). NSS does not appear to negatively impact the oncological outcomes of patients with high-risk PCa. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm our promising findings.

Psoas mass index at the level of the third lumbar vertebra on computed tomography is a prognostic predictor for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

Computed tomography-defined low skeletal muscle mass is associated with oncological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer. However, its association with the outcomes of hormone-treated metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer remains unclear. We aimed to determine the association between metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer and psoas muscle parameters. We retrospectively reviewed 121 patients with N1 and/or M1 metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent primary androgen deprivation therapy between 2005 and 2021, either by administration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist or by surgical castration accompanied by bicalutamide, a first-generation antiandrogen. Before treatment administration, the psoas muscle index at the level of the third lumbar vertebra (psoas muscle area [cm2]/height2 [m2]) and the mean Hounsfield units of the psoas muscle were evaluated using non-contrast computed tomography and in relation to oncological outcomes. The median follow-up was 56.9months. Furthermore, during follow-up, 82 (67.7%) and 53 (43.8%) patients progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer and died, respectively. Multivariate analysis of castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival and overall survival showed significant differences in the Gleason score, clinical N-stage, and psoas muscle index (median cutoff: 3.044 cm2/m2). Pretreatment psoas muscle index is an independent predictor of poor castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival and overall survival in patients with N1 and/or M1 metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological outcomes with transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Transanal total mesorectal (taTME) excision is a method used to assist in the radical removal of the rectum. By adopting the concept of natural orifice surgery, it offers potential benefits over conventional techniques. Early enthusiasm for this strategy led to its rapid and widespread adoption. The imposing of a local moratorium was precipitated by the discovery in Norway of an uncommon multifocal pattern of locoregional recurrence. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the incidence of local recurrence after taTME for rectal cancer. Conforming to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines checklist, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. This included case series and comparative studies between taTME and preferentially laparoscopic procedures published between 2010 and 2021. There were a total of 1175 studies retrieved. After removal and screening for quality and relevance, the final analysis contained 40 studies. The local recurrence rate following taTME was 3.4% (95% CI 2.9%-3.9%, I2 = 0%) in 4987 patients with follow-up durations ranging from 0.7 to 5.5 years. Compared with laparoscopic TME, local recurrence was not statistically different for the taTME group (p = 0.076); however, it was less probable (OR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.24-1.09, I2 = 0%). Systemic recurrence and circumferential resection margin status were secondary outcomes; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Our data suggest that the local recurrence for regular laparoscopic and transanal TME surgeries may be comparable, suggesting that taTME can be performed without influencing locoregional oncological outcomes in patients treated at specialized institutions and who have been cautiously selected.

Recurrence and Survival after Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer - A Post Hoc Analysis of the Ensure Study.

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of operative approach (open [OE], hybrid [HMIE] and total minimally invasive esophagectomy [TMIE]) on operative and oncologic outcomes for patients treated with curative intent for esophageal and junctional cancer. The optimum oncologic surgical approach to esophageal and junctional cancer is unclear. This secondary analysis of the European multicenter ENSURE study includes patients undergoing curative-intent esophagectomy for cancer between 2009-2015 across 20 high-volume centers. Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and the incidence and location of disease recurrence. Secondary endpoints included among others R0 resection rate, lymph node yield and overall survival (OS). In total, 3,199 patients were included. Of these, 55% underwent OE, 17% HMIE and 29% TMIE. DFS was independently increased post TMIE (HR 0.86 [95% CI 0.76-0.98], P=0.022) compared with OE. Multivariable regression demonstrated no difference in absolute locoregional recurrence risk according to operative approach (HMIE vs. OE OR 0.79, P=0.257, TMIE vs. OE OR 0.84, P=0.243). The probability of systemic recurrence was independently increased post HMIE (OR 2.07, P=0.031), but not TMIE (OR 0.86, P=0.508). R0 resection rates (P=0.005) and nodal yield (P<0.001) were independently increased after TMIE, but not HMIE (P=0.424; P=0.512) compared with OE. OS was independently improved following both HMIE (HR 0.79, P=0.009) and TMIE (HR 0.82, P=0.003) as compared with OE. In this European multicenter study, TMIE was associated with improved surgical quality and DFS, while both TMIE and HMIE were associated with improved OS as compared with OE for esophageal cancer.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the safety and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy

BackgroundIn breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) as a breast cancer treatment option remains controversial. We assessed the impact of NAC on surgical and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing IBR.MethodsThis was a retrospective multicenter study of 4726 breast cancer cases undergoing IBR. The rate of postoperative complications and survival data were compared between IBR patients who received NAC and those who did not receive NAC. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to mitigate selection bias for survival.ResultsOf the total 4726 cases, 473 (10.0%) received NAC. Out of the cases with NAC, 96 (20.3%) experienced postoperative complications, while 744 cases (17.5%) without NAC had postoperative complications. NAC did not significant increase the risk of complications after IBR (Odds ratio, 0.96; 95%CI 0.74–1.25). At the median follow-up time of 76.5 months, 36 patients in the NAC group and 147 patients in the control group developed local recurrences. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 93.1% in the NAC group and 97.1% in the control group. (P < 0.001). After matching, there was no significant difference between the two groups.ConclusionIBR after NAC is a safe procedure with an acceptable postoperative complication profile.

An explainable AI-assisted web application in cancer drug value prediction

In recent years, there has been an increase in the interest in adopting Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for healthcare. The proposed system includes•An XAI model for cancer drug value prediction. The model provides data that is easy to understand and explain, which is critical for medical decision-making. It also produces accurate projections.•A model outperformed existing models due to extensive training and evaluation on a large cancer medication chemical compounds dataset.•Insights into the causation and correlation between the dependent and independent actors in the chemical composition of the cancer cell.While the model is evaluated on Lung Cancer data, the architecture offered in the proposed solution is cancer agnostic. It may be scaled out to other cancer cell data if the properties are similar. The work presents a viable route for customizing treatments and improving patient outcomes in oncology by combining XAI with a large dataset. This research attempts to create a framework where a user can upload a test case and receive forecasts with explanations, all in a portable PDF report.