Oncology Team Research Articles

Case report: Poor prognosis or poor prognostication?

This case highlights the limitations of current prognostication and communication in clinical practice. We report a case of a 50 year old patient with metastatic melanoma following admission to intensive care unit and later transferred to palliative care unit for end-of-life care. The patient had clinical improvement despite signs of predictors of death and was later transferred back to care of oncology team. Physicians frequently overestimate or underestimate survival time which can be distressing to patients and families. There is need for further research to improve the accuracy of these tools for the sake of our patients and their families.

Impact of Surgeon-Radiation Oncology Dyads in Oral Cavity Cancer Outcomes.

Multidisciplinary care is paramount in patient-specific decision making, especially as pertaining to oral cavity squamous cell cancer (OCSCC) treatment. Protracted surgery-postoperative-radiation (S-PORT) has a detrimental impact on OCSCC patients' outcomes. This study examined the impact of surgeon-radiation oncologist dyads on the treatment of OCSCC, focusing on S-PORT interval and disease specific outcomes. All OCSCC patients treated in a tertiary cancer center between 2009 to 2017 were included. Patients were categorized into "dyad" and "nondyad" groups defined as whether they were treated by a paired surgeon-radiation oncology team with joint multidisciplinary clinic or shared >30% patient volumes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with a prolonged S-PORT time interval (≥8 weeks). Overall survival and locoregional recurrence were estimated and compared. A total of 444 OCSCC were eligible. Treatment by a dyad was significantly less likely associated with S-PORT ≥ 8 weeks (odds ratio [OR]unadjusted: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.96; p = 0.03). Obtaining pre-operative radiation oncology consultation also decreased the S-PORT interval. Advanced T-category and the need for free tissue flap reconstruction increased the likelihood of prolonged S-PORT on univariate but not multivariate analysis. No significant differences were observed in overall survival or locoregional recurrence by dyad status nor S-PORT (p > 0.05). Surgeon-radiation oncology dyads significantly minimized time from surgery to postoperative radiation in OCSCC. While improvement in overall survival or locoregional recurrence was not observed, these findings support close knit collaborative multidisciplinary treatment care models, including dyad-based care.

DO NEURO ONCOLOGY PATIENTS FEEL SUffiCIENTLY SUPPORTED TO MANAGE THEIR SURGICAL WOUNDS AFTER SURGERY?

Abstract AIMS Establish if neuro oncology patients feel they are sufficiently well supported to manage their wounds post operatively. Is there any correlation to patient wound care management and developing wound infections. METHOD There was an anecdotal rise in wound infections in the neuro oncology department, which led to the team investigation a cause. This project was looking to see if patients felt they were sufficiently supported to manage their wounds post operatively. A survey was sent via email to 94 patient’s who had undergone neurosurgery under the neuro oncology team at a London teaching Hospital in December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024. RESULTS There was a response rate of 23.5%. Overall 96% of patients felt able to manage their wound post operatively. 76% of people wished to have the information on wound care at discharge from hospital. 68% advised that they would like to receive information about wound care via printed material and 76% would like verbal instruction with questions. Patients commented that ‘there was a conflict of information’, and ‘the information at discharge could have been better’. They would like information on’ how to clean it [the wound]. 3 patients had a suspect infection but did not have treatment, and 1 had a confirmed infection with treatment. CONCLUSION Neuro oncology patients are able to manage their wounds post operatively, but they feel that they would benefit from extra support via written material, and verbal instructions. Future projects may include developing an evidence based post operative wound care information leaflet and instructions for wound care. Although in this cohort there was only 1 confirmed infection, further investigation is needed to establish the cause for the apparent increase.

Feasibility of an environmental scan-based approach to collecting information about factors impacting cancer genetics services in Latin American countries.

Clinical cancer genetics services are expanding globally, but national policy and health care systems influence availability and implementation. Understanding the environmental factors within a country is required to appropriately implement, adapt, and evaluate cancer genetics service delivery models. An environmental scan (ES) is an approach used in business, public health, health care and other sectors to collect information about an environment or system for strategic decision making and program planning. An ES has been previously used to assess cancer genetics clinic-level factors to inform quality improvement efforts in the United States. We assessed the feasibility of using an ES to collect information about factors that may influence cancer genetics service delivery in the outer-most socio-ecological model environmental levels (policy, national agencies, healthcare systems, cultural considerations) in three Latin American countries. Oncology and Genetics care team members at three participating sites used publicly available sources and personal experiences to complete a data collection form (DCF) that included questions about subtopics: laws and policies, relevant agencies and regulations, health care systems and insurance, and cultural considerations. Time to complete the DCF and DCF completeness were used to measure ES feasibility. Participating sites completed the DCF in 3 months, and most questions (average, 87.0%) were answered. Questions in the cultural considerations subtopic had the fewest answers (average, 77.8%). Overall, the ES was feasible and identified a lack of published literature related to cultural considerations impacting health care and genetics services uptake in Latin America. Environmental factors impact cancer genetics services, and identification of these factors will facilitate future collaborative research and genetics service delivery dissemination efforts.

7815 Pembrolizumab-Induced Autoimmune Hypophysitis with “Isolated” ACTH Deficiency: Need for Heightened Awareness and Action Among Medical Fraternity

Abstract Disclosure: S. Shankar: None. S.S. Sundar: None. M.S. Vaishnav: None. L. Lekkala: None. K. Thummala: None. S. Srikanta: None. T. Deepak: None. R.B. Vijay: None. K. Muniraj: None. V. Nath: None. C. Siddlingappa: None. P. Ravikumar: None. M.D. Chitra: None. Introduction: Autoimmune hypophysitis caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors [ICIs; anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab alone 7.9%), anti-PD-1 (Pembrolizumab alone 1.7%; nivolumab alone 0%)] are being increasingly documented, with anterior hypopituitarism affecting corticotrophs more commonly than thyrotrophs and gonadotrophs (large time span of onset; different recovery patterns). Clinical Case 2021 Sep Age 65 years (type 2 diabetes, hypertension). Renal Cell Carcinoma S/P radical nephrectomy. 2023 Jul PET-CT= Metastatic pleuropulmonary nodules. Four admissions to Specialist Oncology Hospital [Four 2 weekly cycles of Inj Pembrolizumab 200 mg (with Tab Axitinib 10 mg/day)]. After first cycle: progressive fatigue, body aches, drowsiness. S Sodium= Pre-pembrolizumab= 137 mEq/L (135-145); Post-pembrolizumab= 124, 134, 132, 124; T3= 1.63 to 0.60 to 1.24 to 1.35 ng/mL (0.97-1.69); T4= 6.83 to 4.93 to 10.44 to 11.44 mcg/dL (5.53-11); TSH= 10.46 to 6.28 to 5.39 to 9.48 mIU/mL (0.46-4.68); S Cortisol 8 am= 1.54 mcg/dL (5-25); S Potassium= 4.59 mEq/dL (3.5-5.1)]. One episode of loss of consciousness; EEG= abnormal; MRI Brain= normal. During every hospital admission, oncology, medical, endocrinology and nephrology teams attributed the same to “illness” (no specific diagnosis) and provided symptomatic treatment (IV 3% saline, tolvaptan and sodium bicarbonate tablets).2023 Nov Medicine: Very severe nausea, anorexia, generalised weakness, myalgia, hiccoughs, and inability to walk. Frustrated family members sought admission in “new” General Hospital. S Sodium= 119, 120; S Potassium= 4.8; S Creatinine= 1.67 mg/dL (0.7-1.3); S Uric acid= 4.5 mg/dL (4.40-7.60); Urine spot Sodium= 84 mmol/L; ESR= 144 mm. Endocrinology: S Cortisol 8 am= 0.09 mcg/dL;S Cortisol post 250 mcg Inj Synacthen= 3.76 (>20);Plasma ACTH= 5.4 pg/ml (9-52). S T3= 1.35; S T4= 11.44; S TSH= 9.48; LH= 3.61mIU/mL (1.5-9.3); FSH= 1.4mIU/mL (1.4-18.1); PRL= 30.1 (2.6-13.3); Testosterone total= 314 ng/dL (241-827); TPO antibodies negative. MRI-Pituitary: Partial empty sella; infundibulum neurohypophysis normal; mild asymmetric enhancement (5.5 mm) left cavernous sinus. Treatment: Tab Hydrocortisone 25 mg/day, with complete clinical and biochemical response [Suggestion of gonadotroph dysfunction and partial recovery of thyrotrope dysfunction/ injury. Hence, not on thyroxine replacement]. Clinical Lessons: Mechanisms for differential cellular vulnerability for ICI induced autoimmune pathologies [thyroid (destructive versus stimulatory), islet beta cells, adrenal cortical cells, various anterior pituitary cells (corticotrophs vs thyrotrophs and gonadotrophs] need elucidation. Specific molecular and cellular immunopathogenic pathways in different autoimmune endocrinopathies appear distinct and disparate. Presentation: 6/2/2024

8657 Thymic Neoplasia In A Pediatric Patient With LI-Fraumeni Syndrome: A Case Report

Abstract Disclosure: M.A. Souza: None. W.M. Lins: None. D. di Matteo: None. J.L. Marcayata: None. A. Kuhn: None. H. Charcar: None. F. Ledesma: None. M.Q. Almeida: None. F. Jatene: None. B.B. Mendonca: None. M.C. Fragoso: None. Introduction: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome primarily caused by pathogenic variants in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. The individuals affected are typically young, with a cancer risk of approximately 90% in lifetime. Parents choosing to test their young children face the dilemma of when to disclose their own or the child's status and when to initiate cancer screening if LFS is detected. This process presents psychosocial challenges for both parents and affected children. Both providers and patients question whether the surveillance benefits outweigh the psychological burden of knowing LFS status and screening-related concerns, creating ambivalence toward genetic testing decisions.Case Report: We describe a 6-year-old male with Li-Fraumeni syndrome carrier of the germline pathogenic variant TP53 c.818G>A (p.R273H) in heterozygous (exon 8).In the family history, there are three relatives with advanced tumor cases, with the grandmother already deceased, the mother undergoing chemotherapy treatment, and the cousin being cancer-free for 10 years.The patient in question had no gestational complications. No consanguinity between parents. No signs or symptoms of hormonal hyperfunction. As proposed in the literature, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome patients should undergo frequent screening for early tumor detection, the patient began screening according to the Toronto protocol in 2018, at the age of 1 year and 7 months, through cranial and thoracic MRI, abdominal ultrasound, and annual hormonal assays. In the thoracic MRI conducted in February 2023, an enlarged and heterogeneously signaling thymus was identified, with a nodular formation (absent in previous exams), measuring about 2.5 cm. Facing suspicion of a thymoma, thymic carcinoma, or lymphoma, a biopsy guided by tomography in March 2023 was done. Histological examination was compatible with primary thymic neoplasia. During follow-up, a significant growth of the mass to 9 cm was observed. The patient underwent surgical treatment in August 2023 with resection of the mediastinal mass, and the anatomopathological examination revealed undifferentiated thymic carcinoma, followed in conjunction with the pediatric oncology team. The dilemma is about the adjuvant radiotherapy since the possibility to acquire a new tumor radio-induced such as sarcoma. We proposed to follow with MRI imaging each 3 months and if minimal signal of recurrence he will underwent radiotherapy. Conclusion: In addition to the intrinsic rarity of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, this case draws attention to the possibility of a thymic tumor, an extremely rare neoplasm in syndrome carriers. In the literature, only scattered case reports show this association. Furthermore, this case reinforces the importance of systematic screening for investigating possible neoplasms in this susceptible population. Presentation: 6/1/2024

8657 Thymic Neoplasia in a Pediatric Patient With LI-Fraumeni Syndrome: A Case Report

Abstract Disclosure: M.A. Souza: None. W.M. Lins: None. D. di Matteo: None. J.L. Marcayata: None. A. Kuhn: None. H. Charcar: None. F. Ledesma: None. M.Q. Almeida: None. F. Jatene: None. B.B. Mendonca: None. M.C. Fragoso: None. Introduction: Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) is a rare autosomal dominant hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome primarily caused by pathogenic variants in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. The individuals affected are typically young, with a cancer risk of approximately 90% in lifetime. Parents choosing to test their young children face the dilemma of when to disclose their own or the child's status and when to initiate cancer screening if LFS is detected. This process presents psychosocial challenges for both parents and affected children. Both providers and patients question whether the surveillance benefits outweigh the psychological burden of knowing LFS status and screening-related concerns, creating ambivalence toward genetic testing decisions.Case Report: We describe a 6-year-old male with Li-Fraumeni syndrome carrier of the germline pathogenic variant TP53 c.818G>A (p.R273H) in heterozygous (exon 8).In the family history, there are three relatives with advanced tumor cases, with the grandmother already deceased, the mother undergoing chemotherapy treatment, and the cousin being cancer-free for 10 years.The patient in question had no gestational complications. No consanguinity between parents. No signs or symptoms of hormonal hyperfunction. As proposed in the literature, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome patients should undergo frequent screening for early tumor detection, the patient began screening according to the Toronto protocol in 2018, at the age of 1 year and 7 months, through cranial and thoracic MRI, abdominal ultrasound, and annual hormonal assays. In the thoracic MRI conducted in February 2023, an enlarged and heterogeneously signaling thymus was identified, with a nodular formation (absent in previous exams), measuring about 2.5 cm. Facing suspicion of a thymoma, thymic carcinoma, or lymphoma, a biopsy guided by tomography in March 2023 was done. Histological examination was compatible with primary thymic neoplasia. During follow-up, a significant growth of the mass to 9 cm was observed. The patient underwent surgical treatment in August 2023 with resection of the mediastinal mass, and the anatomopathological examination revealed undifferentiated thymic carcinoma, followed in conjunction with the pediatric oncology team. The dilemma is about the adjuvant radiotherapy since the possibility to acquire a new tumor radio-induced such as sarcoma. We proposed to follow with MRI imaging each 3 months and if minimal signal of recurrence he will underwent radiotherapy. Conclusion: In addition to the intrinsic rarity of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome, this case draws attention to the possibility of a thymic tumor, an extremely rare neoplasm in syndrome carriers. In the literature, only scattered case reports show this association. Furthermore, this case reinforces the importance of systematic screening for investigating possible neoplasms in this susceptible population. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Understanding health literacy's moderating role in remote monitoring for adjuvant endocrine therapy: Findings from a randomized clinical trial.

45 Background: Despite the efficacy of oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) for improving survival among women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer, adherence rates remain low. Our THRIVE study (NCT03592771) investigated the effectiveness of a mobile health remote monitoring app with and without tailored educational messages on AET adherence among women with breast cancer and found no statistically significant treatment effects on 1-year AET adherence overall. Health literacy contributes to patients’ understanding of their treatment plans. We conducted a post hoc analysis of the THRIVE study to examine if health literacy moderates the effectiveness of this intervention. Methods: This non-blinded randomized controlled trial included women with early-stage breast cancer prescribed AET at a large cancer center with 14 clinics across three states. Participants used a pillbox to electronically monitor AET adherence for 1 year and completed surveys at enrollment. Consented participants were randomized into (1) “App”, receiving access to the study adherence and symptom monitoring app for 6 months, with increasing/severe symptoms and missed doses reported in the app triggering follow-ups from the oncology team; (2) “App+Feedback”, receiving additional weekly text messages about managing symptoms, adherence, and communication for 6 months; or (3) “Enhanced Usual Care (EUC).” The primary outcome was 1-year AET adherence captured with the pillbox (≥80% Proportion of Days Covered [PDC] vs. < 80%). The enrollment survey captured participant’s sociodemographic characteristics, including race and ethnicity, education, household income, and health literacy. We used a linear probability model to measure the interaction between the study arm and health literacy on AET adherence. Results: Among 304 women randomized (104 EUC, 98 App, and 102 App+Feedback), the 12-month follow-up retention rate was 88% (n = 266) and 19.4% reported low health literacy at enrollment. Low health literacy was more prevalent among Black (29.4%) vs. White (13.4%) participants (p < 0.001), those with incomes below the federal poverty level (34.4% vs. 17.2% of those with higher incomes, p = 0.02), and those with only a high school degree or lower education (31.7%) vs. with those with some college or higher education (16.4%, p < 0.01). In the low health literacy group, 80.0% of App+Feedback were AET adherent vs. 42.1% of EUC, a 37.9 percentage point (ppt) difference (95% CI: 4.1 to 71.7, p = 0.03); in higher literacy group adherence, 47.1% of App+Feedback vs. 59.0% of EUC were adherent, a -11.8 ppt difference (95% CI: -27.9 to 4.3, p = 0.15). Conclusions: A remote monitoring app with tailored educational text messages led to higher 1-year AET adherence among participants with low health literacy, but not for those with high health literacy. Clinical trial information: NCT03592771 .

Improving the detection and documentation of patients’ symptoms in an integrated gastrointestinal oncology and palliative care clinic.

336 Background: Patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies experience a high burden of disease-related symptoms and treatment side effects. We established an integrated GI oncology and palliative care (PC) clinic in which a PC physician is co-located with the oncology team and can provide timely response to patient distress and facilitate communication with the interdisciplinary palliative care team. Yet, even in the integrated clinic, patient symptoms were unreliably assessed, leading to missed opportunities to address patient suffering. Between October 2023 and January 2024 for patients seen in-person in the integrated clinic for oncology or PC visits, the median rate of symptom documentation was 45%. Emotional, financial, and spiritual distress documentation rates were lowest. We hypothesized that by implementing a systematic, comprehensive patient-reported symptom assessment tool, we could increase the detection and documentation of symptoms, and in turn, improve communication around patient distress and timely response to symptoms. Methods: We measured the rate of symptom documentation (primary outcome) and the use of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool for adults with GI cancers seen in-person in the integrated clinic in Spring 2024. Based on the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and expert consensus, we determined which symptoms were most important to identify. Documentation rates were assessed via manual chart review of visit notes and flowsheet data. Prospective post-intervention data (March to May 2024) were compared to retrospective pre-intervention baseline data (October 2023 to January 2024). Interventions included modification of the ESAS to include GI oncology-specific symptoms, implementation of the tool in paper format to encourage patient-clinician communication, frequent staff education and feedback sessions, creation and dissemination of a resource guide for clinicians to respond to identified distress, and patient satisfaction surveys. Results: 126 patients were included in the study (31 pre-intervention and 95 post-intervention). During the post-intervention period, the median rate of symptom documentation increased from 45% to 83% and the median rate of ESAS survey completion increased from 9% to 68%. Documentation of financial and spiritual distress increased from 13% to 71%, for both, and documentation of emotional distress increased from 35% to 72%. On satisfaction surveys (N=20), most patients reported the tool was helpful in sharing their symptoms (70%), was easy to read and understand (100%), and that their clinician was engaged in addressing their symptoms (67%). Conclusions: The implementation of a patient-reported symptom assessment tool in an integrated GI oncology/PC clinic increased documentation of important symptoms, potentially increasing clinician awareness of patient distress.

Providing access to cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia in cancer care: Preliminary results of an implementation study.

61 Background: Between 30 to 60% of cancer patients display insomnia symptoms. While cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the recommended first-line treatment for cancer-related insomnia, it remains underutilized due to its limited accessibility. To date, we are unaware of any study that has investigated the implementation of CBT-I in routine clinical care. Our prior work showed that a stepped care approach, combining a web-based CBT-I and 1-3 booster therapy sessions, was not significantly inferior in producing sleep improvements than a standard 6-session CBT-I. The main goals of the IMPACT (Insomnia in Patients with Cancer – Personalized Treatment) program are to assess the feasibility and efficacy of implementing this stepped care CBT-I in four cancer centers in Quebec City, Canada. Methods: The ongoing study uses a stepped wedge cluster non-randomized design implementing the stepped care CBT-I at various time intervals across cancer centers. All first-line cancer providers (e.g., nurses, oncologists, radio-oncology technologists, pharmacists) are met every 3-4 months to present/remind them of the rationale of the project and procedures to refer patients to the IMPACT program. Patients having a score ≥ 4 on the sleep item of the Edmonton System Assessment System-Revised (ESAS-R-sleep) receive a leaflet explaining the stepped care CBT-I and how to access the web-based program (first step). Patients with residual insomnia symptoms after completing this first step are offered 1-3 booster sessions with a clinical psychologist (second step). Uptake and retention rates are the main variables. Results: Across cancer centers, 11.9%-50.8% of patients having a score ≥ 4 on the ESAS-R-sleep item were referred to the IMPACT program. The most common reasons for not referring were: 1) the presence of comorbid anxiety or depression symptoms (they were referred instead to the psychosocial oncology team) and; 2) patients declining help. Registration rates were greater when a brief follow-up phone call was conducted to explain the IMPACT program in more detail (vs. giving only the leaflet). Across cancer centers, 10%-54.9% of referred patients registered with the web-based CBT-I, 83.3%-90% of them initiated it and 26%-42.3% completed it. The most common reasons for not completing the web-based CBT-I were: 1) sleep difficulties improved or remitted (36.2%); and 2) the program did not meet patients’ needs (23.4%). Among completers, 29%-56% had residual insomnia and were offered booster sessions. On average, sleep diary data collected during treatment (N=83) indicated a reduction of sleep-onset latency of 20 min and of wake after sleep onset of 45 min. Sleep efficiency increased from 70 to 85%. Conclusions: Although uptake and retention rates could be improved, these preliminary data suggest that stepped care CBT-I can be implemented in routine cancer care and is effective. Clinical trial information: NCT04817163 .

Closing the loop: Utilizing advanced practice providers for a 7-day post hospital discharge follow-up of GI oncology patients at an academic cancer center.

304 Background: Acute care visits for oncology patients may be preventable, especially for high-risk patients with a recent hospitalization. During our 2023 Fiscal Year, we observed an approximate 22% rate for 30 day readmissions for oncology patients, with our gastrointestinal (GI) oncology patients having the most readmissions, at Stanford Cancer Center. Readmission review through clinician surveys suggested that about 28% of unplanned admissions may have been preventable, with root cause analysis identifying timely access to ambulatory symptom management as a major driver. Methods: We established a cancer transitional care (CTC) clinic to provide consistent and timely post-discharge follow-up for oncology patients. We initiated a pilot program for GI oncology patients (chosen due to high acuity and readmission rate) who had an unplanned admission to Stanford Hospital. We aimed to schedule a visit with an advanced practice provider (APPs) within 7 days of discharge. The A3 problem solving process was implemented weekly by a multidisciplinary team. We created a referral in our electronic medical record. Inpatient oncology teams were instructed to place this referral within 3 days before discharge, allowing for adequate patient and family education regarding the goals of CTC visits and ample time for the post-discharge CTC visit to be scheduled prior to patient discharge. Prior to CTC visits, pharmacists performed outreach to reconcile medications to reduce medication errors. Eight oncology APPs were trained regarding the focused nature of a CTC visit, including symptom management, medication reconciliation, and goals of care discussions. Results: At baseline, from June 1 and November 30th, 2023, 61% of patients had follow-up within 7 days of discharge and 12% of patients with none. Between December 13, 2023 and April 19, 2024, CTC implementation resulted in a total of 220 referrals for GI oncology discharges, yielding 144 CTC clinic visits. Resulting in 66.1% of patients having follow up within 7 days of discharge and 9% of patients had no follow up scheduled. 79% of visits were within 7 days of discharge, representing a 29% increase in our goal scheduling timeline. The average time between discharge date and CTC visit was 6.2 days. Sixty six patients also received detailed pharmacy reviews with medication reconciliation and addressing medication access issues. Conclusions: Through our CTC clinic, we standardized post-discharge follow-up access for GI oncology patients, reducing variability in follow up. We plan to disseminate this model across medical oncology subspecialty clinics. Barriers included standardization of follow up with clinical team and expectations for the visit for both patients and clinicians. Future directions include integrating same day symptom management and urgent care access.

The more you test, the more you find: Expansion of routine urine drug screening facilitated through an embedded palliative care clinic in thoracic oncology.

194 Background: Consensus guidelines strongly recommend urine drug screening (UDS) for all patients receiving opioids for cancer pain management. However, implementation of UDS in oncology clinics is underreported. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate incidence of unexpected UDS results among patients with lung cancer after implementation of confirmatory UDS in a thoracic oncology clinic. Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective study of UDS results among patients diagnosed with any stage thoracic malignancy before and after expansion of chromatography-based UDS facilitated by a palliative care provider embedded in a thoracic medical oncology clinic. Patients were included if their first UDS was collected during the year prior to (pre-intervention) or during the 12 months after (post-intervention) opening of the embedded Thoracic Onco-Palliative Clinic on September 5, 2018. In the pre-intervention period, UDS was routinely ordered for only patients referred to a standalone palliative care clinic. This 2-step UDS includes immunoassay and chromatography-based testing followed by interpretation of results by a specialty-trained palliative care clinical pharmacist. In the post-intervention period, UDS was expanded to include any patient seen by Thoracic Medical Oncology regardless of palliative care referral status. A Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were used to compare time to first unexpected UDS between cohorts. Results: More patients had UDS testing in the post-intervention (n = 182) versus pre-intervention (n = 61) period. A higher volume and proportion of patients had unexpected UDS results in the post-cohort (25/182; 13.7%) compared to pre-cohort (6/61; 9.8%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.43). The number of UDS tests per patient was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the post-cohort (mean (SD): 2.4 (2.7)) vs. pre-cohort (1.5 (1.3)). A larger proportion of pre-cohort patients completed only one UDS during the study period (pre: 73.8% (45/61); post: 53.3% (97/182); p < 0.01). In the post-cohort, 58 (31.9%) patients completed UDS ordered by oncology team prior to palliative care referral compared to 0 patients in the pre-cohort; 29 (21.4%) patients completed UDS without receiving outpatient palliative care compared to 0 patients in the pre-cohort. Kaplan-Meier curves for the pre- and post-cohorts were similar during the first 6 months of drug screening (p = 0.7) and diverged after 6 months, with a higher probability of detecting an unexplained UDS in the post cohort at 24 months (Pre: 15.0%; Post: 40.0%). Conclusions: Implementation of confirmatory UDS in a thoracic oncology clinic facilitates closer monitoring for nonprescribed substance use during opioid management and continued detection of unexpected UDS results up to 24 months.

Leveraging artificial intelligence for timely detection and referral of incidental pulmonary nodules at a safety-net hospital.

422 Background: Incidental pulmonary nodules (IPNs) are commonly reported through a multitude of radiologic exams. A small number of these IPNs can harbor lung cancer (LC). To aide LC detection rates, hospitals must identify and validate the completion of appropriate follow-up regarding IPNs in a timely manner. The problem with timely referral and completion of work up is found to be amplified in safety-net settings with limited resources. John Peter Smith (JPS) hospital, a safety-net hospital, has developed a method to identify, track, and refer patients presenting with IPNs. Methods: JPS has created an algorithm to classify all IPNs by means of Thynk Health, an Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform that uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) to identify and track incidental findings and lung cancer screening patients (LCS). The algorithm created a scoring system by combining Fleischner Society (2017) and the American College of Radiology (ACR) LCS (Lung-RADS) guideline recommendations. The scoring system was designed to mimic Lung-RADS established by the ACR (1, 2, 3, 4A, and 4B). The assigned score creates a risk stratification to assist providers in the patient’s care plan. Using NLP, the project queried radiologic exams performed at JPS searching for key terminology relating to IPNs. Findings were then reviewed by radiology staff for validity and assigned a score based on the algorithm. Program exclusions, when identified in the radiology report, included: patient < 35 years, patient has known cancer or under surveillance of oncology team, abnormalities favoring infectious process, LCS patients and when nodule size is not reported in the radiologist’s dictation. Results: A current state analysis was completed from 3/25/24 to 4/25/24. The AI platform analyzed 5,276 CT exams (2049 abdomen, 1347 head/neck, and 1880 chest) involving partial or complete imaging of the lungs. A total of 727 (13.8%) IPNs were flagged for review. After excluding exams falling outside of the set program parameters, a total of 178 (3.4%) IPNs were identified. 21 (11.8%) of the IPNs identified received a score of 4A or 4B. Patients found to have a score of 4A (11, 6.2%) and 4B (10, 5.6%) underwent additional review. Conclusions: Our team has created a unique system that can be used as a model for other large health systems. By leveraging technology, we are able to successfully identify key factors associated with IPNs to help ensure patients receive the recommended care in a timely manner. Results of JPS incidental pulmonary nodule program: first monthly analysis. JPS Pulmonary Nodule Score 4A 4B Number of Patients (% of IPNs) 11 (6.2%) 10 (5.6%) Median Age (years) 70 68.5 JPS Assigned PCP 1 7 (63.6%) 7 (70%) Median Smoking History (PY) 2 6.4 24.5 Average Nodule Size (mm) 11.5 34.3 Pulmonary Referral 3/11 (27.3%) 7/10 (70%) Positive for Cancer 0 3/4 (75%) 1 Primary care provider. 2 Pack years.

Breastfeeding experiences among young breast cancer survivors: A survey study.

Following breast cancer (BC), many young women are interested in future childbearing and some may wish to breastfeed. However, limited information is available regarding their lactation experiences. Participants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter, prospective cohort study of women ≤40 years diagnosed with stage 0-III BC between 2006-2016 and who reported one or more live births following diagnosis, were surveyed about pregnancy and breastfeeding after BC treatment, including reasons for attempting and stopping breastfeeding, satisfaction, and supports. Of 143 eligible women sent a survey, 115 responded and 94 were included in the analytic cohort. Breastfeeding was attempted by 55% of women (52 of 94). Among those who had not attempted, 93% noted prior bilateral mastectomies (39 of 42). Among those who attempted breastfeeding, 69% had undergone lumpectomy and radiotherapy (36 of 52), 83% of whom reported no milk production from their treated breast (30 of 36). Most (65%, 34 of 52) were at least somewhat satisfied with their ability to breastfeed. Reasons for stopping breastfeeding included: having completed the planned duration (36%, 19 of 52); to start/resume endocrine therapy (21%, 11 of 52); and to resume breast imaging (8%, 4 of 52). Approximately half (27 of 55) of women who had not undergone bilateral mastectomies recalled receiving specific information about breastfeeding after BC, mostly from the oncology team (59%, 16 of 27), online resources (48%, 13 of 27), or a lactation consultant (44%, 12 of 27). Most young BC survivors who attempted to breastfeed were able to and were satisfied with the experience, despite challenges. Specific resources to support BC survivors who wish to breastfeed are needed.

From diagnosis to survivorship addressing the sexuality of women during cancer.

For women diagnosed with cancer, side effects affecting their sexuality are extremely common and can be distressing and life-changing; however, most women are left in the dark without any guidance from their oncology teams regarding possible side effects and treatment options. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines provide guidance on the recommended assessments related to the domains of sexual function and their respective interventions. Despite the existence of these guidelines, the reality is that only a few women with cancer are asked about sexual concerns that result from cancer treatments. Common barriers to sexuality discussion reported by oncology providers include a lack of qualification and knowledge, not having a place to refer patients, and not knowing how to start the conversation. Social media remains a widely untapped resource regarding sexuality and cancer interventions, as people are increasingly turning to social media for health information and advice. This may be especially relevant for sexuality, as oncologists may not feel comfortable or well-trained to discuss the topic, and patients may be reluctant to bring up sexual concerns during their visits. Social media can play a critical role in studying sexual health and in sexuality interventions, particularly in adolescent and young adult patients with cancer. Here, we discuss the lack of inclusion regarding sexuality in oncology, the rates of sexual dysfunction in patients with cancer, treatment options for common sexual concerns, how to utilize the reach of various social media channels, and provide patient and provider resources.

All that can still be done: Communicating with precision and patient-centeredness when recommending hospice initiation for cancer patients.

Through careful word choice and never‐ending presence, oncology teams can provide ongoing, and even amplified support and care for hospice‐eligible patients and caregivers. Voicing nonabandonment, eliciting patient priorities and concerns, and making clear the myriad benefits of hospice care resources can all help oncology clinicians deliver high quality end‐of‐life cancer care.

Policy brief of the Belgian Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan mirror group: children, adolescents and young adults with cancer

Children and Adolescents and Young Adults with cancer represent a young population with specific needs, which need to be addressed in a patient- and cancer-driven way. There is an urgent need to support and extend the ongoing initiatives in Belgium. First, multidisciplinary care programmes dedicated to children need to be reviewed, and those for Adolescents and Young Adults need to be developed with close collaboration between paediatric and adult oncology and haematology teams. This needs to be done considering the entire patient journey; from cancer prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, follow-up of late effects, transition pathways between paediatric and adult wards, and palliative care. Second, national haemato/oncology precision programmes adapted to this young population with rare cancers, including infrastructure to manage cancer gene predisposition in CAYAs with cancers and their relatives, needs to be developed. This multi-level plan aims to ensure improved outcome with high quality of care for the young population with cancer in Belgium in line with Europe’s Beating Cancer Plan initiatives.

Primary Cauda Equina Lymphoma Mimicking Meningioma

Background: Spinal cord lymphomas represent a minority of extranodal lymphomas and often pose diagnostic challenges by imitating primary spinal tumors or inflammatory/infective lesions. This paper presents a unique case of primary cauda equina lymphoma (PCEL) and conducts a comprehensive review to delineate the clinical and radiological characteristics of this rare entity. Case Report: A 74-year-old male presented with progressive paresthesia, motor weakness, and symptoms indicative of cauda equina syndrome. Neurological examination revealed paraparesis and sphincter dysfunction. Imaging studies initially suggested an intradural meningioma. However, surgical intervention revealed a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma infiltrating the cauda equina. Findings: A systematic review of the pertinent literature identified 18 primary cauda equina lymphoma cases. These cases exhibited diverse clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes. The mean age at diagnosis was 61.25 years for women and 50 years for men, with an average follow-up of 16.2 months. Notably, 35% of patients were alive at 18 months, highlighting the challenging prognosis associated with PCEL. Discussion: Primary spinal cord lymphomas, especially within the cauda equina, remain rare and diagnostically complex due to their nonspecific clinical manifestations. The review highlights the need to consider spinal cord lymphoma in patients with neurological symptoms, even without a history of systemic lymphoma. Diagnostic Approaches: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the primary diagnostic tool but lacks specificity. Histopathological examination remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. The review underscores the importance of timely biopsy in suspected cases to facilitate accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Management and Prognosis: Current management involves biopsy and chemotherapy; however, optimal treatment strategies remain ambiguous due to the rarity of PCEL. Despite aggressive therapeutic interventions, prognosis remains poor, emphasizing the urgency for enhanced diagnostic and treatment modalities. Conclusions: Primary cauda equina lymphoma poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, necessitating a high index of suspicion in patients with atypical spinal cord symptoms. Collaborative efforts between neurosurgical, oncological, and infectious diseases teams are imperative for timely diagnosis and management. Advancements in diagnostic precision and therapeutic options are crucial for improving patient outcomes.

The assessment of care burden and influencing factors on family caregivers for cancer patients.

The family caregivers as primary caregivers play a crucial role regarding the care of cancer patients. As defined in the literature, the care burden encompasses the negative objective and subjective outcomes including psychological and physical health problems, economic and social issues, deterioration of family relationships and feelings of loss of control that arise from caregiving responsibilities. This study aims to assess the care burden and to evaluate the associated factors among family caregivers of cancer patients receiving treatment at a state hospital in Türkiye. This cross-sectional study was conducted with the family caregivers of patients undergoing treatment in the radiation oncology department of a state hospital in Türkiye. The study population consisted of 350 individuals, with a participation rate of 80%. Participants were administered a questionnaire concerning determining daily living activities and identifying the caregiving burden through their socio-demographic characteristics. The care burden among primary family caregivers while the delivery of health services was severe for 85.1% of them. The average ZBI score of caregivers was 55.92 ± 14.58. It was clarified that family caregivers' burden was influenced by several factors, including the duration of caregiving, difficulties experienced while caring for the patient, and the negative impact on their daily roles. Our study's findings indicate the need for health professionals to support caregivers of cancer patients while over half of the caregivers were identified as having a severe level of caregiving burden. It is important to raise awareness among nurses and the oncology team with a holistic approach. In the delivery of health services, caregivers' needs should be identified first, support mechanisms should be activated and interventions should be made to meet these needs. This study's findings highlight the need to identify and problems faced by family members during caregiving. This is important for sustainable and cost-effective holistic care. The results of this study are reported based on the guidelines of The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies (cohort, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies) in Epidemiology (STROBE). Our study's findings indicate the need for health professionals to support caregivers of cancer patients. It is important to raise awareness among nurses and the oncology team with a holistic approach. In the delivery of health services, caregivers' needs should be identified first, support mechanisms should be activated and interventions should be made to meet these needs.

Exploring patients and caregivers needs and experiences in oncological physiotherapy: a call for collaborative care

PurposeThis study explores whether the full potential of physiotherapy is reaching cancer patients and their caregivers at all stages of the oncological process, aiming to identify gaps and opportunities for improving care.MethodsThe World Cafe co-design methodology facilitated discussions among cancer patients and caregivers. This dynamic, inclusive, and engaging approach fostered diverse perspectives and deeper insights through collaborative and flexible discussions. Sessions were recorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed.ResultsSixteen participants were involved (eight cancer survivors and eight caregivers). The mean age of cancer survivors was 63.8 years, while the average age of caregivers was 59.3 years. Breast cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis among patients, and most caregivers had lost their family members to cancer. Analysis revealed two primary themes: “feeling cared for” and “the role of physiotherapy in the oncological process.” Key findings highlight the need for more humanized healthcare, with professionals providing support through effective communication and empathy. Significant gaps were detected in both systematic referrals to physiotherapists and their integration into care teams. Testimonies highlighted the lack of knowledge about the full potential of physiotherapy in oncology, hindering access. There was also a demand for recognizing specialized oncological physiotherapists.ConclusionsThese findings highlight significant gaps in physiotherapy care for cancer survivors and caregivers, including unmet needs due to the lack of information, resources, and effective communication. Future efforts should focus on increasing the visibility of physiotherapy, integrating specialized physiotherapists into oncology teams, and enhancing the emotional education of healthcare professionals to provide more humanized care.