Onclarity Human Papillomavirus Research Articles

Performance of BD Onclarity HPV assay on FLOQSwabs vaginal self-samples.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing on self-collected vaginal samples has been shown to improve women's participation to cervical cancer screening programs, particularly in regions with limited access to health care. Nevertheless, the introduction of self-sampling in cervical cancer screening programs requires prior clinical validation of the HPV assay in combination with a self-sample collection device, including also the laboratory workflow and automation required for high-throughput testing in screening. In this study, the performance of BD Onclarity HPV on FLOQSwab-collected vaginal self-samples has been compared to clinician-taken liquid-based cytology samples, to detect high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using two high-throughput platforms, BD Viper LT and BD COR. The study findings have shown a similar performance of BD Onclarity on testing self-collected samples, confirming the validation of the proposed pre-analytical and analytical protocols for their use in cervical cancer screening programs based on self-collected vaginal samples.

Evaluation of the characteristics of multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) infections identified using the BD Onclarity HPV assay and comparison with those of single HPV infection.

BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a major cause of cervical cancer and associated precursor lesions. Multiple HPV genotype infections have been reported. However, their clinicopathological characteristics still remain elusive.MethodsFor this study, 814 consecutive patients who had undergone colposcopy and HPV genotyping test using BD Onclarity HPV assay were retrospectively selected. Clinicopathological parameters of multiple HPV infections were compared with those of single HPV infection.ResultsMultiple HPV infections were found in 110 out of 814 cases (13.5%). Multiple HPV infections were associated with a significantly higher incidence of high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSILs) compared with single HPV infection. Other high-risk HPV genotypes, in addition to HPV 16, were found more frequently in the multiple HPV infections group; these included HPV 51, 52, 33/58, 56/59/66, and 35/39/68. No specific coinfection pattern was not identified. Additionally, the number of HPV genotypes in multiple HPV infections was not associated with the progression to HSIL or squamous cell carcinoma.ConclusionsMultiple HPV infections have distinct clinicopathological characteristics (compared with single HPV infection). As their biological behavior is uncertain, close and frequent follow-up is warranted.

Concordance between the BD Onclarity and Roche cobas assays for detection of HPV DNA in a Chinese population.

As cervical cancer screening shifts from cytology to human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, a major issue involves validating more HPV tests. In recent years, some HPV tests are used for clinical performance verification in China. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the BD Onclarity (Becton, Dickinson and Company)HPV assay differs from the Roche cobas(Roche Molecular Systems)HPV assay, as determined using 944 cervical samples, including 588 with sequencing results. In the nucleic acid assay accuracy verification, the assays showed excellent concordance for detection of HPV16 (κ = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.97) and HPV18 (κ = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.97), and very good concordance for the 12 other high-risk types (HPV31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, κ = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.75-0.83). The overall agreement for HPV DNA detection between Onclarity and cobas was very good (κ = 0.7755). No difference for ≥CIN2 sensitivity was observed between Onclarity and cobas (both 96.5%), whereas the ≥CIN2 specificity for detection of Onclarity (16.6%, 95% CI: 13.7-19.9) was higher than that of cobas (11.5%, 95% CI: 9.1-14.5). Onclarity exhibited comparable screening performance and triage efficiency compared to cobas in the detection of cervical disease in Chinese women.

Comparison of Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 assay with BD Onclarity HPV assay for human papillomavirus genotyping.

Presently, human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening is commonly used and is replacing conventional cytology screening tests. The HPV genotyping assay is useful for triage in cervical cancer screening and the evaluation of HPV vaccination effects. In this study, we evaluated the clinical performance of two HPV genotyping assays, BD Onclarity HPV (Onclarity) and Seegene Anyplex II HPV28 (Anyplex) in the detection of relevant cervical lesions and for HPV genotyping concordance. Anyplex and Onclarity assays were performed on 920 consecutive liquid-based specimens. Anyplex, sensitivity, specificity, and genotyping concordance with Onclarity were optimal when restricted to ≥2+ (medium) viral loads. HPV genotyping agreement between the two assays ranged between 0.75 and 0.9 (excellent), except for HPV 33/58, which was 0.73 (good). With Onclarity as a reference, the relative sensitivity of Anyplex for the detection of ≥CIN 2 was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.99–1.1) and the relative specificity for detection of negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy (NILM) was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85–0.93). For most ≥CIN 2 lesions, high-risk HPV was detected by Onclarity (66/72) and Anyplex (69/72) assays. For high-risk HPV negative ≥CIN 2 lesions, possible high-risk HPV genotypes were detected by Anyplex. In conclusion, the genotyping agreement between the tests was good to excellent. Full genotyping with Anyplex might confer additional benefits to patients with ≥CIN 2, although the difference is small. We also suggest an optimal cutoff value when reporting HPV infections using the Anyplex assay (≥2+; medium viral loads).

CYTOLOGICAL, HPV GENOME, AND HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CORRELATION OF CERVICAL SMEARS IN FEMALES 30 YEARS AND ABOVE

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the patterns of cervical smear cytology in relation to human papillomavirus (HPV) and to correlate with histopathological diagnosis in females of 30 years and above. Methods: The 2-year prospective study was done in the Department of Pathology in 100 patients who attended the Gynaecology OPD of Govt. Medical College, Patiala. The cervical brushings obtained were subjected to cytological examination by liquid-based cytology through SurePath method and for HPV evaluation by BD Onclarity HPV assay. The cytological findings were further correlated with histopathological examination. Results: Majority of the females were in the age group of 30−45 years (62%). There was high incidence of dysplasia and malignancy in those who were of parity 3, 4, and above. The most common presenting symptom was discharge per vaginum (DPV) seen in 28% of cases. Maximum cases on cytology were diagnosed as NILM (including inflammatory pathology, 49%) followed by LSIL as 14% and malignant as 13%. Overall HPV genome was detected in 54% of the samples, the cases diagnosed as dysplasia and malignancy showed 68.42% and 100% presence of HPV, respectively. This was found to be statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Pap smear along with HPV evaluation is an effective screening method for the detection of pre-invasive lesions and cancers of cervix that are potentially curable.

THE PREVALENCE OF HPV POSITIVE OROPHARYNGEAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AT A MAJOR REFERRAL CENTER IN SOUTHERN AFRICA

<h3>Objective</h3> Limited data on the prevalence of human papilloma virus (HPV)–positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) in Southern Africa exist. The aim of the current study was to determine the prevalence of HPV-positive OPSCC at a major referral public hospital (Tygerberg Hospital) in the Western Cape region, South Africa. <h3>Methods</h3> Sequential surgical samples of 266 cases of OPSCC diagnosed over a 10-year period (2007-2017) were selected for evaluation and relevant patient characteristics were documented. p16 immunohistochemistry was performed as a screening test. All p16-positive cases were further evaluated for HR-HPV using a novel DNA polymerase chain reaction technology (BD Onclarity HPV assay). <h3>Results</h3> Of 266 cases, 14% were positive for p16 (n = 36). Of 36 p16-positive cases, 23 were negative and 13 were positive for HR-HPV (5%) when evaluated by PCR. p16 was found to have a positive predictive value of 36.1%. HPV subtypes were HPV-16 (n = 10), HPV-18 (n = 1), HPV-52 (n = 1), and HPV-31 (n = 1). One case was positive for HPV-16 and HPV-31. HPV-positive OPSCC occurred in 10 men and 3 women with a mean age of 51 years (range, 33-72 years). Most HPV-positive OPSCC were nonkeratinizing (n = 10) or partially keratinizing (n = 1). In contrast, HPV-negative OPSCC were predominantly keratinizing (n = 218). <h3>Conclusions</h3> The presence of HR-HPV in 5% of cases suggests that HR-HPV as a minor etiologic agent in OPSCC at this institution. Because of its suboptimal positive predictive value (36.1%), p16 immunohistochemistry alone is insufficient to confirm an HPV-positive OPSCC at this center and, when positive, HPV-specific testing must be performed by one of the available platforms.

Onclarity Performance in Human Papillomavirus DNA Detection in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Cervical Samples.

Diagnosis of HPV infection is usually performed from cervical liquid-based cytology specimens (LBC), but these often contain a large amount of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes, most of which might cause transient infections. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of BD Onclarity HPV test genotyping method on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cervical specimens compared with genotyping results from LBC. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from women surgically treated for cervical intraepithelial lesions (CINs) at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, from September 2012 to June 2013 were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology of the European Institute of Oncology. The FFPE and LBC specimens were genotyped using the same extended genotyping Onclarity assay. We collected 99 samples (26 CIN 1, 30 CIN 2, and 43 CIN 3+), but 15 were excluded from the analysis: these 84 samples show an overall agreement of 89% for HPV status between FFPE Onclarity samples versus LBC samples. The FFPE and LBC samples showed identical genotype in 75% samples, compatible genotype (at least 1 of the genotypes detected in LBC sample was found in the tissue sample) in 14% specimens, and discrepant genotype in 11% samples. Our data demonstrate a very good concordance between HPV genotypes found in cytological and tissue samples, suggesting that the Onclarity method could also be used to detect HPV in tissue samples and that the HPV genotype detected in FFPE samples is one of the HPV detected in cytological samples, supporting the thesis that one lesion is caused by one HPV genotype.

Analytical and Clinical Sample Performance Characteristics of the Onclarity Assay for the Detection of Human Papillomavirus.

The objective of this study was to determine the result reproducibility and performance of the BD Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay (Onclarity) on the BD Viper LT platform using both contrived and clinical specimens. Reproducibility was assessed in BD SurePath liquid-based cytology (LBC) medium (SurePath) using contrived panels (HPV genotype 16 [HPV16] positive, HPV18 positive, or HPV45 positive) or clinical specimens (HPV16, -18, -31, -33/58, -45, or -52 positive or HPV negative). In addition, specimens from 3,879 individuals from the Onclarity trial were aliquoted prior to or following cytology processing and tested for HPV. Finally, specimens were collected using either the Cervex-Brush or Cytobrush (or Cytobrush/spatula) for comparison of HPV results. Contrived specimens showed >95% concordance with the expected results, and pooled clinical specimens had standard deviations and coefficients of variation ranging from 0.87 to 1.86 and 2.9% to 5.6%, respectively. For precytology and postcytology aliquot analyses, specimens showed >98.0% overall agreement and mean differences in cycle threshold (CT ) scores for HPV ranging from -0.07 to 0.31. Positivity rates were close between the Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush/spatula for all age groups tested. Onclarity results are reproducible and reliable, regardless of sample collection before or after cytology aliquoting. Onclarity performs well regardless of the method of specimen collection (Cervex-Brush or Cytobrush/spatula) for cervical cancer screening.

Clinical and Analytical Performance of the BD Onclarity HPV Assay with SurePath Screening Samples from the Danish Cervical Screening Program Using the VALGENT Framework.

The Validation of HPV Genotyping Tests (VALGENT) framework is an international cooperation designed to evaluate human papillomavirus (HPV) assays with genotyping capabilities. Here, we assessed the performance of the BD Onclarity assay using Danish SurePath cervical screening samples collected under the fourth VALGENT installment, consisting of 998 consecutive samples from a screening population and 297 enriched samples with abnormal cytology (100 with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance [ASCUS], 100 with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL], and 97 with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [HSIL]). The Onclarity assay detects six HPV genotypes individually (genotypes 16, 18, 31, 45, 51, and 52) and eight genotypes in three bulks (genotypes 33 and 58; genotypes 56, 59, and 66; and genotypes 35, 39, and 68). The clinical performance of the Onclarity assay for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) and of two consecutive cytology outcomes negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (2×NILM) was assessed relative to that of the GP5+/6+ PCR-enzyme immunoassay (GP-EIA) by a noninferiority test. The relative sensitivity for ≥CIN2 was 1.00 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.04), and the relative specificity for 2×NILM was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.06). The Onclarity assay was found to be noninferior to the GP-EIA in terms of both sensitivity (P = 0.0006) and specificity (P < 0.0001). The type-specific performance of the Onclarity assay was also assessed, using the GP5+/6+ PCR with Luminex genotyping (GP-LMNX) as the comparator. The Onclarity assay showed good concordance for almost all HPV genotype groups. A stability analysis of SurePath samples was also performed, where a SurePath aliquot was stored refrigerated for 7 months and the internal control of the Onclarity assay was used as a marker for cellularity. The threshold cycle (CT ) value was the same (24.8) in the first and second Onclarity runs, showing that a SurePath sample can be stored refrigerated for 7 months and still remain a valid test specimen.

Clinical performance of Onclarity HPV assay and Cobas HPV test in detection of cervical precancer and cancer in Chinese women

ObjectiveThe Roche Cobas (Cobas) and BD Onclarity (Onclarity) human papillomavirus (HPV) assays are convenient, PCR-based, HPV DNA tests; currently, data on performance of Onclarity in Chinese women is limited. We aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of Onclarity for detecting cervical lesions in Chinese women. MethodsIn total, 1122 women were enrolled into this study. Exfoliated cervical cells were collected in PreservCyt medium and were tested using Cobas and Onclarity. Cytology and histology were interpreted by senior cytologists and a panel of pathologists, respectively, at Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. ResultsThe assays showed excellent concordance for HPV16 (kappa = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85–0.97) and for 12 other high-risk types (HPV31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59/66/68, kappa = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.78–0.90), and very good concordance for HPV18 (kappa = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.69–0.81). No difference for ≥CIN2 sensitivity was observed between Onclarity and Cobas (both 90.5%); and the <CIN2 specificity for detection was similar between Onclarity (84.2%, 95% CI: 81.6–86.4) and Cobas (80.4%, 95% CI: 77.6–82.8). When combined with cytology triage, the colposcopy referral rate point estimate was slightly lower for Onclarity (9.0%) than for Cobas (11.0%), with the same ≥CIN2 sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI: 53.1–88.8) for Onclarity and Cobas. ConclusionsOnclarity exhibited comparable screening performance and triage efficiency compared to Cobas in detection of cervical lesions in Chinese women.

Machine Learning Interpretation of Extended Human Papillomavirus Genotyping by Onclarity in an Asian Cervical Cancer Screening Population.

This study aimed (i) to compare the performance of the BD Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay with the Cobas HPV test in identifying cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3 or above (CIN2/3+) in an Asian screening population and (ii) to explore improving the cervical cancer detection specificity of Onclarity by machine learning. We tested 605 stratified random archived samples of cervical liquid-based cytology samples with both assays. All samples had biopsy diagnosis or repeated negative cytology follow-up. Association rule mining (ARM) was employed to discover coinfection likely to give rise to CIN2/3+. Outcome classifiers interpreting the extended genotyping results of Onclarity were built with different underlying models. The sensitivities (Onclarity, 96.32%; Cobas, 95.71%) and specificities (Onclarity, 46.38%; Cobas, 45.25%) of the high-risk HPV (hrHPV) components of the two tests were not significantly different. When HPV16 and HPV18 were used to further interpret hrHPV-positive cases, Onclarity displayed significantly higher specificity (Onclarity, 87.10%; Cobas, 80.77%). Both hrHPV tests achieved the same sensitivities (Onclarity, 90.91%; Cobas, 90.91%) and similar specificities (Onclarity, 48.46%; Cobas, 51.98%) when used for triaging atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Positivity in both HPV16 and HPV33/58 of the Onclarity channels entails the highest probability of developing CIN2/3+. Incorporating other hrHPVs into the outcome classifiers improved the specificity of identifying CIN2/3 to up to 94.32%. The extended genotyping of Onclarity therefore can help to highlight patients having the highest risk of developing CIN2/3+, with the potential to reduce unnecessary colposcopy and negative psychosocial impact on women receiving the reports.

Risk detection for high-grade cervical disease using Onclarity HPV extended genotyping in women, ≥21 years of age, with ASC-US or LSIL cytology

ObjectivesThere is growing interest in using human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping as a risk-based triage approach for women with atypical squamous cells-undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) cytology. MethodsThis analysis includes 2807 subjects with ASC-US or LSIL cytology, ≥21 years, from the baseline phase of the Onclarity HPV trial. All women were referred to colposcopy/biopsy. Hierarchical-ranked prevalence and risk values, associated with high-grade cervical disease, were calculated based on extended genotyping. ResultsHPV 16 carried the highest risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) in both the ASC-US and LSIL populations. Risk of ≥CIN3 and ≥CIN2 associated with the other 13 genotypes varied somewhat for women with ASC-US and LSIL, however, HPV 31, 18, 33/58, 51 and 52 appear to comprise an intermediate risk band. Risk associated with HPV 35/39/68, 45, and 56/59/66, in either cytology population, was relatively low and beneath the benchmark threshold risk for immediate colposcopy. Restricting the analysis to women 21–24 years, ≥25 years, or ≥30 years produced similar results. ConclusionsHPV genotyping identified multiple risk bands for ≥CIN3 and ≥CIN2 in the ≥21 year-old ASC-US and LSIL populations. These results support a 1-year follow-up period to preclude immediate colposcopy for ASC-US or LSIL women positive for the lowest-risk HPV genotypes.

HPV infections and cytologic abnormalities in vaccinated women 21–34 years of age: Results from the baseline phase of the Onclarity trial

ObjectivesCountries with school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination have seen significant reductions in vaccine-targeted HPV infections, cytologic abnormalities, and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (≥CIN2). However, the impact of HPV vaccination in the United States (where vaccination is largely opportunistic) may be less due to lower coverage rates and vaccination in patients at ages beyond the recommended routine vaccination age. MethodsThe Onclarity trial enrolled 33,858 subjects ≥21 years who were screened with cytology and the BD Onclarity HPV Assay. HPV positive women or those with cytologic abnormalities underwent colposcopy and biopsy. The prevalence of HPV, cytologic abnormalities, and ≥CIN2 was compared in a subset of 14,153, vaccinated and unvaccinated women, 21–34 years. Results were compared by vaccination status; Mantel-Haenszel analysis was performed to determine the association between vaccination status and prevalence, adjusting for age. ResultsThe prevalence of overall HPV, HPV16, 18, 31, and 33/58 were all lower in vaccinated women for each age group; a significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed in vaccinated women for all ages combined. Cytologic low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or worse was lower in vaccinated women (p = 0.021), as was ≥CIN2 prevalence associated with HPV 16 or 18 (p = 0.011). ConclusionsWomen with a prior history of HPV vaccination have a lower prevalence of any high-risk HPV, HPV 16, 18, 31, and 33/58; a cytology result of ≥LSIL, and ≥CIN2 associated with HPV 16/18 compared to unvaccinated women. A lower HPV prevalence in older, vaccinated women suggests that “catch-up” vaccination provides benefit.

HPV Testing With 16, 18, and 45 Genotyping Stratifies Cancer Risk for Women With Normal Cytology.

ABSTRACTObjectivesTo determine the BD Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay performance and risk values for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) or higher and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or higher during Papanicolaou/HPV cotesting in a negative for intraepithelial lesions or malignancies (NILM) population.MethodsIn total, 22,383 of the 33,858 enrolled women were 30 years or older with NILM cytology. HPV+ and a subset of HPV– patients (3,219/33,858 combined; 9.5%) were referred to colposcopy/biopsy.ResultsOverall, 7.9% of women were Onclarity positive; HPV 16 had the highest prevalence (1.5%). Verification bias-adjusted (VBA) CIN2 or higher and CIN3 or higher prevalences were 0.9% and 0.3%, respectively. Onclarity had VBA CIN2 or higher (44.1%) and CIN3 or higher (69.5%) sensitivities, as well as CIN2 or higher (92.4%) and CIN3 or higher (92.3%) specificities—all similar to Hybrid Capture 2. HPV 16, 18, 45, and the other 11 genotypes had CIN3 or higher risks of 6.9%, 2.6%, 1.1%, and 2.2%, respectively.ConclusionsOnclarity is clinically validated for cotesting in NILM women. Genotyping actionably stratifies women at greater CIN3 or higher risk.

Stratified risk of high-grade cervical disease using onclarity HPV extended genotyping in women, ≥25 years of age, with NILM cytology

ObjectivesIncreasing evidence suggests that extended human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping (beyond 16/18) is effective for risk stratification in women with normal cytology. This report provides extended genotyping results, using the BD Onclarity HPV Assay, for individual genotypes HPV16, 18, 31, 45, 51, and 52 ̶ and three pooled genotype results for HPV33/58, 35/39/68, and 56/59/66. Methods27,037 women with normal cytology, ≥25 years, were enrolled into the Onclarity HPV trial during routine screening. Women positive for any HPV genotype were referred to colposcopy/biopsy. Hierarchical-ranked prevalence and risk values, associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 2 or worse (≥CIN2) or ≥CIN3, were calculated based on extended genotyping results. ResultsHPV 16 and 31 carried the highest risk for ≥CIN2 (11.6% and 12.1%, respectively) and ≥CIN3 (8.1% and 7.5%, respectively); these genotypes were the most prevalent in both ≥CIN2 (29.6% and 19.3%, respectively) and ≥CIN3 (43.7% and 22.5%, respectively). Of the other 12 genotypes, HPV 18, 33/58, and 52 comprised an intermediate risk band (≥CIN2 risk range: 4.9–6.8%; ≥CIN3 risk range: 3.9–5.0%). Genotypes 45, 51, 35/39/68, and 56/59/66 constituted the lowest risk band for both disease grades (≥CIN2 value risk range: 1.7–3.0%; ≥CIN3 value risk range: 1.2–3.6%). ConclusionsExtended genotyping stratifies risk for ≥CIN2/3 in the ≥25 year-old, normal cytology population. While baseline HPV 16/31 values exceeded the risk threshold for colposcopy referral, the management of women with normal cytology who were positive for the intermediate- or lower-risk genotypes may evolve based on refined risk estimates as well as clinical factors.

The Onclarity Human Papillomavirus Trial: Design, methods, and baseline results

ObjectivesThe baseline phase of the Onclarity trial was conducted to determine the screening performance of the Onclarity human papillomavirus (HPV) assay for detecting cervical cancer and precancer (≥CIN2) during triage of women ≥21 years with ASC-US cytology, as an adjunct test in women ≥30 years with normal cytology and for primary screening (HPV alone) in women ≥25 years. Methods33,858 women ≥21 years were enrolled during routine clinic visits. All women with abnormal cytology, women ≥25 years that were high-risk HPV positive, and a random subset of women ≥25 years, negative by cytology and for HPV, were referred for colposcopy and cervical biopsy. Verification bias adjustment with 95% confidence intervals was applied. ResultsASC-US prevalence was 5.8%. The overall HPV prevalence was 14.7%; for HPV 16, 18, and the 12 other HPV types it was 2.7%, 0.8%, and 11.2%, respectively. The prevalence of ASC-US and HPV was inversely proportional with age. The verification bias adjusted prevalence of ≥CIN2 and ≥CIN3 was 1.8% and 0.8%, respectively. Overall, five cases of cervical cancer were identified (all were HPV positive). The odds ratios associated with any HPV positive genotype, or with individual genotypes HPV 16, HPV 18, and HPV 31, for ≥CIN3, were statistically significant when compared to negative histology (p < 0.0001 for all). ConclusionsThis report provides demographic information, cytology findings, HPV genotype information, and histopathology for participants in the baseline phase of this trial and offers further evidence to support genotype-specific screening for cervical cancer and precancer.Clinical Trial Registry URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01944722.