On-treatment Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels Research Articles

Asymptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis/Occlusion in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Its Frequency and Implications for Cerebrovascular and Cardiovascular Events.

The atherogenic characteristics of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) increase the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease including not only coronary artery disease but ischemic stroke. Asymptomatic intracranial artery stenosis/occlusion (IASO) is a major cause of ischemic stroke, but it has not yet been fully characterized in patients with HeFH. This study analyzed 147 clinically diagnosed subjects with HeFH who underwent magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography imaging for evaluation of IASO (≥50% diameter stenosis). Major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events (cardiac death, ischemic stroke, and acute coronary syndrome) were compared in patients with HeFH with and without asymptomatic IASO. Asymptomatic IASO was observed in 13.6% of patients with HeFH. The untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level (240±95 versus 244±75 mg/dL; P=0.67) did not differ between the 2 groups. Despite the use of lipid-lowering therapies (statin, P=0.71; high-intensity statin, P=0.81; ezetimibe, P=0.33; proprotein convertase subxilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor, P=0.39; low-density lipoprotein apheresis, P=0.14), on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level in patients with both HeFH and IASO was still suboptimally controlled (97±62 versus 105±50 mg/dL; P=0.17), accompanied by a higher triglyceride level (median, 109 versus 79 mg/dL; P=0.001). During the 12.4-year observational period (interquartile range, 6.2-24.6 years), asymptomatic IASO exhibited a 4.04-fold greater likelihood of experiencing a major adverse cardiovascular event (95% CI, 1.71-9.55; P=0.001) in patients with HeFH. This increased risk of a major adverse cardiovascular event was consistently observed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model adjusting clinical characteristics (hazard ratio, 4.32 [95% CI, 1.71-10.9]; P=0.002). A total of 13.6% of Japanese subjects with HeFH presented with asymptomatic IASO. Despite lipid-lowering therapies, patients with both HeFH and IASO more likely had elevated risk of cerebrovascular and cardiovascular events. Our findings highlight asymptomatic IASO as a phenotypic feature of HeFH-related atherosclerosis, which ultimately affects future outcomes.

Concomitant Coronary Atheroma Regression and Stabilization in Response to Lipid-Lowering Therapy

BackgroundThe frequency, characteristics, and outcomes of patients treated with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy and showing concomitant atheroma volume reduction, lipid content reduction, and increase in fibrous cap thickness (ie, triple regression) are unknown. ObjectivesThis study was designed to investigate rates, determinants, and prognostic implications of triple regression in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and treated with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy. MethodsThe PACMAN-AMI (Effects of the PCSK9 Antibody Alirocumab on Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial used serial intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and optical coherence tomography to compare the effects of alirocumab vs placebo in patients receiving high-intensity statin therapy. Triple regression was defined by the combined presence of percentage of atheroma volume reduction, maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm reduction, and minimal fibrous cap thickness increase. Clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were assessed. ResultsOverall, 84 patients (31.7%) showed triple regression (40.8% in the alirocumab group vs 23.0% in the placebo group; P = 0.002). On-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were lower in patients with vs without triple regression (between-group difference: −27.1 mg/dL; 95% CI: −37.7 to −16.6 mg/dL; P < 0.001). Triple regression was independently predicted by alirocumab treatment (OR: 2.83; 95% CI: 1.57-5.16; P = 0.001) and a higher baseline maximum lipid core burden index within 4 mm (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.06; P = 0.013). The composite clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization occurred less frequently in patients with vs without triple regression (8.3% vs 18.2%; P = 0.04). ConclusionsTriple regression occurred in one-third of patients with acute myocardial infarction who were receiving high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy and was associated with alirocumab treatment, higher baseline lipid content, and reduced cardiovascular events. (Vascular Effects of Alirocumab in Acute MI-Patients [PACMAN-AMI]; NCT03067844)

Current Treatment Options in Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is the rare form of familial hypercholesterolemia causing extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, leading to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in the first decades of life, if left untreated. Early diagnosis and effective lipid lowering therapy (LLT) are crucial for the prevention of early ASCVD in patients with HoFH. On-treatment LDL-C levels are the best predictor of survival. However, due to the absent or defective LDL-receptor activity, most individuals with HoFH are resistant to conventional LLT, that leads to LDL-C clearance by upregulating LDL-receptors. We are at the dawn of a new era of effective pharmacotherapies for HoFH patients, with new agents providing an LDL-receptor independent cholesterol reduction. In this context, the present review provides a summary of the currently available therapies and emerging therapeutic agents for the management of patients with HoFH, in light of recent evidence and guideline recommendations.

Interrelation between baseline plaque characteristics and changes in coronary atherosclerosis with the PCSK9-inhibitor alirocumab: insights from the PACMAN-AMI randomized trial

Abstract Background Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) frequently experience recurrent atherothrombotic events, largely attributable to non-culprit lesions with high-risk characteristics. Statins can halt the progression of coronary atherosclerosis, and addition of protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-inhibitors (PCSK9i) results in incremental low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering and atheroma regression. Purpose We sought to examine the interrelation between baseline imaging characteristics, on-treatment LDL-C levels, and changes in coronary atherosclerosis as assessed by serial, multi-modality intracoronary imaging in patients with AMI. Methods This is a post hoc analysis from the PACMAN-AMI randomized trial. Patients were randomly allocated to biweekly alirocumab 150 mg vs. placebo on top of high-intensity statin initiated within 24h of presentation with AMI, and underwent serial imaging of the two non-infarct-related arteries at baseline and after 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent atheroma volume (PAV) by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Powered secondary endpoints were maximal lipid core burden index (maxLCBI4mm) by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and minimum fibrous cap thickness (FCTmin) by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Results Of 300 randomized patients (mean age 58.5±9.8 years, 18.7% women, baseline LDL-C 3.94±0.87 mmol/L), IVUS was serially performed in 265 patients (537 arteries). LDL-C levels decreased to 1.92±0.79 mmol/L with placebo and 0.61±0.61 mmol/L with alirocumab (p&amp;lt;0.001). Compared with placebo (statin alone), alirocumab added to statin resulted in greater PAV reduction (−2.13% vs. −0.92%; p&amp;lt;0.001), greater maxLCBI4mm reduction (−79.42 vs. −37.60; p=0.006), and greater increase in FCTmin (62.67 vs. 33.19 μm; p=0.001). Changes in PAV and maxLCBI4mm were inversely related to on-treatment LDL-C levels, and change in FCTmin was positively related to on-treatment LDL-C levels (Figure 1). Across all patients, we found significant, inverse relationships between change in PAV and baseline PAV [slope: −0.072 (95% CI −0.101 to −0.042); p&amp;lt;0.001], between change in maxLCBI4mm and baseline maxLCBI4mm [slope: −0.437 (95% CI −0.505 to −0.369); p&amp;lt;0.001], and between change in FCTmin and baseline FCTmin [slope: −0.436 (95% CI −0.541 to −0.332); p&amp;lt;0.001]; these findings indicate greater PAV and maxLCBI4mm regression in lesions with greater PAV and LCBI4mm at baseline, and greater fibrous cap thickening in lesions with thinner fibrous caps at baseline. Conclusion In this study of intensive LDL-C lowering treatment initiated in the acute AMI setting, more favorable plaque changes were observed in patients with lower on-treatment LDL-C levels and in lesions with more adverse baseline plaque characteristics. Whether AMI patients with high-risk plaque features might derive greater clinical benefit from early initiation of intensive LDL-C-lowering therapies requires further investigation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Sanofi, Regeneron

Effects of statin response on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

SUMMARYOBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate the effects of statin response on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.METHODS:A total of 1029 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were enrolled in the study. The patients who failed to achieve >40% reduction in baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels within 30 days to 12 months after statin initiation were defined as suboptimal statin responders. The adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular outcomes for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statins were estimated via the Cox proportional regression model. The relationship between the statin response and cardiovascular outcomes was also evaluated in a subgroup of on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 55 mg/dL.RESULTS:Among the study population, 573 (55.6%) patients demonstrated suboptimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statin therapy. These patients showed a significantly higher incidence of the composite of major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, reinfarction, recurrent myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization during the follow-up compared with optimal responders (adjusted hazard ratios 3.99; 95%CI 2.66–6.01; p<0.001). In a subgroup of patients with on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels below 55 mg/dL, suboptimal statin responders also showed unfavorable cardiovascular outcomes (adjusted hazard ratios 8.73; 95%CI 2.81–27.1; p<0.001).CONCLUSIONS:The present study showed that over half of the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction did not exhibit optimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to statin. These patients have an increased risk of future major adverse cardiovascular events.

Substantially Elevated Atherosclerotic Risks in Japanese Severe Familial Hypercholesterolemia Defined by the International Atherosclerosis Society.

The International Atherosclerosis Society (IAS) has proposed "severe familial hypercholesterolemia" (FH) as a phenotype with the highest cardiovascular risk. However, whether this criteria could appropriately stratify a high-risk Japanese patient with FH remains unknown. This study sought to characterize atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in IAS-defined Japanese subjects with severe FH. This study analyzed 380 clinically diagnosed subjects with heterozygous FH without any history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Severe FH was defined as untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >400mg/dL, >310mg/dL plus 1 high-risk feature, or >190mg/dL plus 2 high-risk features according to IAS-proposed statement. The occurrence of first and subsequent composite outcomes (cardiac [cardiac death + coronary artery disease + coronary revascularization] and noncardiac events [stroke + peripheral artery disease] was compared between subjects with severe (n=135) and non-severe (n=227) FH. Severe FH was identified in 40.3% of study population. They had higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P< 0.001) and lipoprotein(a) (P = 0.03) levels. Moreover, they more frequently received high-intensity statin (P< 0.001), PCSK9 inhibitor (P< 0.001), and lipoprotein apheresis (P = 0.01) than nonsevere FH subjects did, which resulted in a lower on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of subjects with severe FH (113 ± 47.2 vs 130 ± 53.9mg/dL; P = 0.007). However, during the 7.4-year observational period, subjects with severe FH exhibited a 9.3-, 15.4-, and 5.9-fold greater risk for first composite (P< 0.001), cardiac (P< 0.001), and noncardiac outcomes (P = 0.02), respectively. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard model consistently revealed the 7.8- and 7.9-fold elevated risks of first (P< 0.001) and of subsequent (P< 0.001) composite outcomes in subjects with severe FH. Japanese subjects with severe FH present profound risks of both first and subsequent atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases in the primary prevention settings. These findings support the clinical applicability of IAS-defined severe FH in Japanese patients, which identifies those who require further stringent antiatherosclerotic management.

299-OR: Relative Contribution of Statin Intensity, Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Level and Duration of Statin Therapy for Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Objectives: To estimate the optimal statin therapy including statin intensity, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and duration of statin therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a real-world setting. Research Design and Methods: From the Korean National Health Insurance Service Cohort (2007-2015), 8,937 patients with T2D (≥40 years) who had received statin therapy for at least 90 days were included. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including coronary heart disease (CHD), ischemic stroke (IS) and cardiovascular death was estimated according to statin intensity, on-treatment serum concentration of LDL-C and duration of statin therapy, respectively. The relative contribution of these three factors for the risk of MACE was quantified by calculating the proportion of log-likelihood explained by each factor. Results: The hazard ratio (HR) of MACE was higher in patients receiving low intensity statins compared with those receiving moderate-to-high intensity statins (HR 1.38, p=0.027). As a reference to LDL-C of 100 mg/dl, below 80 mg/dl was associated with lower risk of MACE. Among patients who received moderate-to-high intensity statins, there was a trend that the longer the duration of statin therapy, the lower the risk of MACE; and HRs of MACE reduced significantly after at least 18 months of statin therapy (adjusted HR 0.71, p=0.011) as a reference to 3 months of statin therapy. The proportion of explainable log-likelihood for MACE was biggest for duration of statin (0.047), followed by statin intensity (0.013) and on-treatment LDL-C level (0.001). Conclusion: Longevity of statin therapy is as important as, or more important than, statin intensity or achieved LDL-C for the reduction of cardiovascular risk in T2D patients. Disclosure J. Kim: None. J. Choi: None. S. Kim: None. N. Kim: None.

High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease Treated with Statins: An Observation from the REAL-CAD Study.

Aim: The association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level after statin therapy and cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. Thus, in this study, we sought to determine how HDL-C level after statin therapy is associated with cardiovascular events in stable CAD patients. Methods: From the REAL-CAD study which had shown the favorable prognostic effect of high-dose pitavastatin in stable CAD patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ＜120 mg/dL, 9,221 patients with HDL-C data at baseline and 6 months, no occurrence of primary outcome at 6 months, and reported non-adherence for pitavastatin, were examined. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring emergent admission after 6 months of randomization. Absolute difference and ratio of HDL-C levels were defined as (those at 6 months–at baseline) and (absolute difference/baseline)×100, respectively. Results: During a median follow-up period of 4.0 (IQR 3.2–4.7) years, the primary outcome occurred in 417 (4.5%) patients. The adjusted risk of all HDL-C-related variables (baseline value, 6-month value, absolute, and relative changes) for the primary outcome was not significant (hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.08, HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94–1.12, HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98–1.12, and HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94–1.24, respectively). Furthermore, adjusted HRs of all HDL-C-related variables remained non-significant for the primary outcome regardless of on-treatment LDL-C level at 6 months. Conclusions: After statin therapy with modestly controlled LDL-C, HDL-C level has little prognostic value in patients with stable CAD.

The impact of adjusting for baseline in pharmacogenomic genome-wide association studies of quantitative change

In pharmacogenomic studies of quantitative change, any association between genetic variants and the pretreatment (baseline) measurement can bias the estimate of effect between those variants and drug response. A putative solution is to adjust for baseline. We conducted a series of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) response to statin therapy in 34,874 participants of the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) cohort as a case study to investigate the impact of baseline adjustment on results generated from pharmacogenomic studies of quantitative change. Across phenotypes of statin-induced LDL-C change, baseline adjustment identified variants from six loci meeting genome-wide significance (SORT/CELSR2/PSRC1, LPA, SLCO1B1, APOE, APOB, and SMARCA4/LDLR). In contrast, baseline-unadjusted analyses yielded variants from three loci meeting the criteria for genome-wide significance (LPA, APOE, and SLCO1B1). A genome-wide heterogeneity test of baseline versus statin on-treatment LDL-C levels was performed as the definitive test for the true effect of genetic variants on statin-induced LDL-C change. These findings were generally consistent with the models not adjusting for baseline signifying that genome-wide significant hits generated only from baseline-adjusted analyses (SORT/CELSR2/PSRC1, APOB, SMARCA4/LDLR) were likely biased. We then comprehensively reviewed published GWASs of drug-induced quantitative change and discovered that more than half (59%) inappropriately adjusted for baseline. Altogether, we demonstrate that (1) baseline adjustment introduces bias in pharmacogenomic studies of quantitative change and (2) this erroneous methodology is highly prevalent. We conclude that it is critical to avoid this common statistical approach in future pharmacogenomic studies of quantitative change.

P832LDL-C levels on statins and cardiovascular event risk in stable coronary artery disease: An observation from the REAL-CAD study

Abstract Background The relation between very low on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level and the cardiovascular event risk is still unclear in patients receiving the same doses of statins. Methods From the REAL-CAD study comparing high-dose with low-dose pitavastatin therapy in Japanese patients with stable coronary artery disease, 11105 patients without reported non-adherence for the study drug were divided into 3 groups according to the on-treatment LDL-C level at 6-month (&lt;70 mg/dL, 70–100 mg/dL, and ≥100 mg/dL; N=1016, N=3078, and N=1665 in the pitavastatin 1 mg/day stratum; N=2431, N=2524, and N=391 in the pitavastatin 4 mg/day stratum). Primary outcome measure was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, or unstable angina requiring emergent admission. Results In the pitavastatin 1 mg/day stratum, cumulative 4-year incidence of the primary outcome measure was not significantly different across the 3 groups (5.0%, 5.7%, and 5.2%, P=0.51), while in the 4 mg/day stratum, it was significantly higher in the LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group than in other groups (4.5%, 3.4%, and 9.1%, P&lt;0.001). The adjusted risks of the LDL-C &lt;70 mg/dL group relative to the LDL-C 70–100 mg/dL group (reference) remained insignificant for the primary outcome measure in both 1 mg/day and 4 mg/day strata (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58–1.18, P=0.32, and HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.88–1.79, P=0.22). The adjusted risk of LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group relative to the reference group was not significant for the primary outcome measure in the 1 mg/day stratum (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.60–1.11, P=0.21), while it was highly significant in the 4 mg/day stratum (HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.08–5.17, P&lt;0.001). In the on-treatment LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL group in the 4 mg/day stratum, LDL-C increased by 6.3 mg/dL from baseline to 6-month despite dose escalation of pitavastatin from 1 mg/day to 4 mg/day, suggesting the presence of unreported poor adherence in this small subgroup. Adjusted Effects of On-treatment LDL-C Conclusions Very low on-treatment LDL-C level (&lt;70 mg/dL) was not associated with lower cardiovascular event risk compared with moderately low on-treatment LDL-C level (70–100 mg/dL) in patients receiving the same doses of statins. Too much emphasis on the target LDL-C strategy might mislead the clinical practice. Acknowledgement/Funding The Comprehensive Support Project for Clinical Research of Lifestyle-Related Disease of the Public Health Research Foundation.

Percentage low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol response to a given statin dose is not fixed across the pre-treatment range: Real world evidence from clinical practice: Data from the ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V Study.

Recent European guidelines recommend in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to achieve a reduction of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol of at least 50% if the baseline low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level is between 1.8 and 3.5 mmol/L. Systematic reviews have associated a given statin/dose combination with a fixed percentage low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol response. Algorithms for detecting cases and estimating the prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia often rely on such fixed percentage reductions. We used data from 915 coronary patients participating in the EUROASPIRE V study in whom atorvastatin or rosuvastatin therapy was initiated at hospital discharge and who were still using these drugs at the same dose at a follow-up visit 6 or more months later. Pre and on-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were compared across the full low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol range. The prevalence of FH was estimated using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, once using observed pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and once using imputed pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol by following the common strategy of applying fixed correction factors to on-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Inter-individual variation in the low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol response to a fixed statin and dose was considerable, with a strong inverse relation of percentage reductions to pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. The percentage low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol response was markedly lower at the left end of the pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol range especially for levels less than 3 mmol/L. The estimated prevalence of familial hypercholesterolaemia was 2% if using observed pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and 10% when using imputed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. The inter-individual variation in the percentage low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol response to a given dose of a statin is largely dependent on the pre-treatment level: the lower the pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol level the smaller the percentage low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol reduction. The use of uniform correction factors to estimate pre-treatment low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol is not justified.

Prevalence and pharmacologic management of familial hypercholesterolemia in an unselected contemporary cohort of patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder characterized by elevated plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) associated with premature cardiovascular disease. Using the data from the START (STable Coronary Artery Diseases RegisTry) study, a nationwide, prospective survey on patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), we described prevalence and lipid lowering strategies commonly employed in these patients. The study population was divided into "definite/probable FH," defined as a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score ≥6, "possible FH" with DLCN 3-5, and "unlikely FH" in presence of a DLCN <3. Among the 4030 patients with the DLCN score available, 132 (3.3%) were classified as FH (2.3% with definite/probable and 1.0% with possible FH) and 3898 (96.7%) had unlikely FH. Patients with both definite/probable and possible FH were younger compared to patients not presenting FH. Mean on-treatment LDL-C levels were 107.8 ± 41.5, 84.4 ± 40.9, and 85.8 ± 32.3 (P < 0.0001) and a target of ≤70 mg/dL was reached in 10.9%, 30.0%, and 22.0% (P < 0.0001) of patents with definite/probable, possible FH, and unlikely FH, respectively. Statin therapy was prescribed in 85 (92.4%) patients with definite/probable FH, in 38 (95.0%) with possible FH, and in 3621 (92.9%) with unlikely FH (P = 0.86). The association of statin and ezetimibe, in absence of other lipid-lowering therapy, was more frequently used in patients with definite/probable FH compared to patients without FH (31.5% vs 17.5% vs 9.5%; P < 0.0001). In this large cohort of consecutive patients with stable CAD, FH was highly prevalent and generally undertreated with lipid lowering therapies.

Cardiovascular outcomes during extended follow-up of the AIM-HIGH trial cohort

Epidemiologic studies have shown that low levels of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and elevated triglycerides are independent predictors of cardiovascular (CV) events, though randomized trials of HDL-C-raising therapies to reduce clinical events have been largely disappointing. The Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides and Impact on Global Health Outcomes (AIM-HIGH) trial failed to show that extended release niacin (ERN) reduced CV events in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia who were on statin-based therapy. We sought to determine whether extended follow-up of AIM-HIGH participants changed these null results. AIM-HIGH was a placebo-controlled trial of 3414 patients with established CV disease, low baseline HDL-C, and elevated triglycerides levels randomized to ERN 1500-2000mg/d vs placebo. Participants also received simvastatin with or without ezetimibe to attain on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels of 40-80mg/dL. The trial was halted after a mean 3-year follow-up because of futility. Among 3236 participants alive at the end of blinded study, 2613 (81%; ERN=1,312, placebo=1301) were followed a mean 1.1 additional years. Ninety-five percent of subjects remained on statin, but only 4% on ERN. At a mean total follow-up of 4.1years, there were 343 primary CV endpoints in the ERN arm and 305 CV endpoints in placebo participants (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.96, 1.30). Ischemic stroke was also not significantly different after extended follow-up in the two groups (2.2% vs 1.5%, P=.13). In patients with CV disease and atherogenic dyslipidemia on statin-based therapy, 3years of ERN treatment did not lower CV event rates. An additional year of follow-up off assigned treatment did not alter these findings.

Sex-Related Differences of Coronary Atherosclerosis Regression Following Maximally Intensive Statin Therapy: Insights From SATURN

ObjectivesThe study sought to explore sex-related differences in coronary atheroma regression following high-intensity statin therapy. BackgroundGuidelines now recommend high-intensity statins in all individuals with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. MethodsSATURN (Study of Coronary Atheroma by Intravascular Ultrasound: Effect of Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin) employed serial intravascular ultrasound measures of coronary atheroma volume in patients treated with rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg for 24 months. The treatment groups did not differ significantly in change from baseline of percent atheroma volume (PAV) or total atheroma volume (TAV) on intravascular ultrasound, nor in safety or clinical outcomes. ResultsCompared with men (n = 765), women (n = 274) were older (p < 0.001) and more likely to have hypertension (p < 0.001), diabetes (p = 0.002), and higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (p = 0.01), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.004) levels. At follow-up, women had higher high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.001) and CRP (p < 0.001), but similar LDL-C (p = 0.46) levels compared with men. Compared with men, women had lower baseline PAV (34.0 ± 8.0% vs. 37.2 ± 8.2%, p < 0.001) and TAV (122.4 ± 55 mm3 vs. 151.9 ± 63 mm3, p < 0.001), yet demonstrated greater PAV regression (–1.52 ± 0.18% vs. –1.07 ± 0.10%, p = 0.03) and TAV regression (–8.27 ± 0.9 mm3 vs. –6.59 ± 0.50 mm3, p = 0.11) following treatment. Greater PAV regression in women versus men occurred with rosuvastatin (p = 0.004), those with diabetes (p = 0.01), stable coronary disease (p = 0.01), higher baseline LDL-C (p = 0.02), and higher CRP (p = 0.04) levels. On multivariable analysis, female sex was independently associated with PAV regression (p = 0.01), and a sex-treatment interaction was found (p = 0.036). For participants with on-treatment LDL-C levels <70 mg/dl, women achieved greater PAV regression (–1.81 ± 0.22% vs. –1.12 ± 0.13%, p = 0.007) and TAV regression (–10.1 ± 1.1 mm3 vs. –7.16 ± 0.65 mm3, p = 0.023) than men, whereas PAV and TAV regression did not differ by sex, with LDL-C levels ≥70 mg/dl. ConclusionsWomen with coronary disease demonstrate greater coronary atheroma regression than men when empirically prescribed guideline-driven potent statin therapy. This benefit appears in the setting of lower on-treatment LDL-C levels. (CRESTOR Athero Imaging Head to Head IVUS Study [SATURN]; NCT000620542)

Safety Profile of Subjects Treated to Very Low Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels (

Recent US guidelines expand the indications for high-intensity statin therapy, yet data on the safety of attaining very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are scarce. Among 16,304 participants in the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) with on-treatment LDL-C levels, we identified 767 who did and 7,387 who did not achieve LDL-C <30 mg/dl on rosuvastatin 20 mg daily and 718 participants who did and 7,436 who did not achieve LDL-C reductions of ≥70% on rosuvastatin, and 8,150 allocated to placebo. In participants with an LDL-C <30 mg/dl, we observed an increase in the risk of physician-reported type 2 diabetes with an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.56 (1.09 to 2.23, p = 0.01) and physician-reported hematuria (hazard ratio 2.10 [1.39 to 3.19], p <0.001) compared with rosuvastatin-treated participants with LDL-C ≥30 mg/dl. There was also an increased risk of certain musculoskeletal, hepatobiliary, and psychiatric disorders. No difference in renal failure, cancer, memory impairment, or hemorrhagic stroke was observed, although there were few events in these categories. In rosuvastatin-treated participants, achieving LDL-C reduction ≥70% versus <70% did not appear to be associated with increased risk of hepatobiliary, renal, or urinary disorders. In conclusion, in this post hoc analysis in the JUPITER, achieving LDL-C levels <30 mg/dl with high-intensity statin therapy appeared to be generally well tolerated but associated with certain adverse events, including more physician-reported diabetes, hematuria, hepatobiliary disorders, and insomnia. These data may guide the monitoring of patients on intensive statin therapy and adverse events in trials of therapies that lead to very low LDL-C levels.

Benefit–Risk Assessment of Rosuvastatin in the Treatment of Atherosclerosis and Related Diseases

Rosuvastatin has been marketed for approximately a decade. In this review we critically discuss available evidence on the benefits and risks from its use. In clinical trials using rosuvastatin, 'lowest is best' was relevant for on-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Targeting levels <50mg/dl was associated with the greatest decrease in vascular morbidity/mortality in the primary prevention setting. Also, such reduction can induce atherosclerosis regression without increasing the risk of adverse effects. Pooled data suggest that the safety profile of rosuvastatin is not different from that of other statins. It was estimated that rosuvastatin-associated absolute hazards of muscle-, liver- and renal-related adverse effects are lower than the corresponding vascular benefits in moderate vascular risk individuals. However, these data are subject to biases and need confirmation on a prospective basis. Significant liver enzyme elevations are rare. These often imply underlying non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is associated with increased vascular risk. Rosuvastatin can improve biochemical biomarkers and histological score of NAFLD. Whether this benefit is associated with vascular risk reduction should be assessed by prospective studies. Both chronic kidney disease and albuminuria independently predict vascular morbidity and mortality. Rosuvastatin improved the estimated glomerular filtration rate and decreased albuminuria in patients with moderately impaired kidney function. Also, vascular morbidity and mortality might be reduced in these patients. The same was not relevant in end-stage renal disease. Rosuvastatin-induced proteinuria appears to be of tubular origin, not relating to kidney injury. Rosuvastatin increases the risk of new-onset diabetes by dose-dependently impairing insulin sensitivity. Obese individuals with prediabetes appear to be predominantly affected. However, absolute vascular benefits of rosuvastatin may counterbalance this risk. Rosuvastatin is effective for the prevention and management of atherosclerotic vascular disease. Individualization of its use can maximize benefits and reduce the risk of adverse effects.

The Relationship Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels and the Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease in High-Risk Patients Treated With Pravastatin

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in high-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia without a history of CVD. Patients who were receiving or started treatment with pravastatin, were followed-up for 2 years. Patients were divided into quartiles according to on-treatment LDL-C. The maximum contrast method based on the Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the relationship between achieved LDL-C and the incidence of CVD. Incidence of CVD was also compared according to whether a number of risk factor targets were achieved. A total 6,229 patients were enrolled, with 4,916 having reported LDL-C values. During the 2 years, 69 cases of CVD (6.7/1000 patient years), including 36 coronary artery disease (CAD) (3.5/1000 patient years) and 28 strokes (2.7/1000 patient years), occurred. The comparison of on-treatment LDL-C level quartiles suggested that the incidence of all CVD decreased linearly as the LDL-C levels decreased. Incidence of CAD showed a curvilinear relationship to LDL-C levels, suggesting some attenuation of risk below LDL-C of 119 mg/dL. The incidence of all CVD and CAD tended to be decreased as the number of achieved risk factor targets increased. In conclusion, through our observational study, it was shown that a linear relationship between the incidence of CVD and LDL-C was observed in high-risk hypercholesterolemic patients. The low incidence of CVD in the present study may be associated with multifactorial management of conventional risk factors including high LDL-C levels. However, prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings.

C-Reactive Protein, but not Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels, Associate With Coronary Atheroma Regression and Cardiovascular Events After Maximally Intensive Statin Therapy

Baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels predict major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, and hospitalization for unstable angina). The association between changes in CRP levels with plaque progression and MACE in the setting of maximally intensive statin therapy is unknown. The Study of Coronary Atheroma by Intravascular Ultrasound: Effect of Rosuvastatin Versus Atorvastatin (SATURN) used serial intravascular ultrasound measures of coronary atheroma volume in patients treated with rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg for 24 months. The treatment groups did not differ significantly in the change from baseline of percent atheroma volume on intravascular ultrasound, CRP-modulating effects, or MACE rates, thus allowing for a (prespecified) post hoc analysis to test associations between the changes in CRP levels with coronary disease progression and MACE. Patients with nonincreasing CRP levels (n=621) had higher baseline (2.3 [1.1-4.7] versus 1.1 [0.5-1.8] mg/L; P<0.001) and lower follow-up CRP levels (0.8 [0.5-1.7] versus 1.6 [0.7-4.1] mg/L; P<0.001) versus those with increasing CRP levels (n=364). Multivariable analysis revealed a nonincreasing CRP level to independently associate with greater percent atheroma volume regression (P=0.01). Although the (log) change in CRP did not associate with MACE (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.50; P=0.17), the (log) on-treatment CRP associated significantly with MACE (hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.56; P=0.02). On-treatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels did not correlate with MACE (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.35; P=0.45). Following 24 months of potent statin therapy, on-treatment CRP levels associated with MACE. Inflammation may be an important driver of residual cardiovascular risk in patients with coronary artery disease despite aggressive statin therapy. http://clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT000620542.

Coronary atheroma volume and cardiovascular events during maximally intensive statin therapy

The impact of baseline coronary plaque burden on the clinical outcome in patients receiving aggressive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering therapy to levels <70 mg/dL is unknown. We assessed the prognostic significance of baseline coronary plaque burden following high-intensity statin therapy. SATURN used serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to measure coronary atheroma volume in 1039 patients before and after 24 months of treatment with rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg. This post hoc analysis compared the relationship between baseline percent atheroma volume (PAV) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina) in patients with baseline PAV less than (n = 519) or greater than (n = 520) the median. Patients with a higher baseline PAV had a similar LDL-C compared with those with a lower baseline PAV at baseline (119.0 ± 29 vs. 121.0 ± 27 mg/dL, P = 0.09) and at follow-up (65.3 ± 23 vs. 65.8 ± 22 mg/dL, P = 0.47). In multivariable analysis, each standard deviation increase in baseline PAV was associated with a 28% increase in MACE [HR 1.28 (1.05, 1.57), P = 0.01]. Those with the highest quartile of baseline PAV (>41.8%) had a 2-year cumulative MACE rate of 12%, which was significantly higher (log-rank P = 0.001) than MACE rates of all lower PAV quartiles (MACE: quartile 3, 2, and 1 were 5.7, 7.9, and 5.1%, respectively). LDL-C levels at baseline [HR 0.96 (0.79, 1.18), P = 0.73] and on-treatment [HR 1.19 (0.83, 1.73), P = 0.35] were not associated with MACE. Following 2 years of high-intensity statin therapy, a baseline coronary atheroma volume predicted MACE, despite the achievement of very low on-treatment LDL-C levels.

Association of LDL Cholesterol, Non–HDL Cholesterol, and Apolipoprotein B Levels With Risk of Cardiovascular Events Among Patients Treated With Statins

The associations of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (apoB) levels with the risk of cardiovascular events among patients treated with statin therapy have not been reliably documented. To evaluate the relative strength of the associations of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB with cardiovascular risk among patients treated with statin therapy. Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled statin trials in which conventional lipids and apolipoproteins were determined in all study participants at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Relevant trials were identified by a literature search updated through December 31, 2011. Investigators were contacted and individual patient data were requested and obtained for 62,154 patients enrolled in 8 trials published between 1994 and 2008. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% CIs for risk of major cardiovascular events adjusted for established risk factors by 1-SD increase in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB. Among 38,153 patients allocated to statin therapy, 158 fatal myocardial infarctions, 1678 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, 615 fatal events from other coronary artery disease, 2806 hospitalizations for unstable angina, and 1029 fatal or nonfatal strokes occurred during follow-up. The adjusted HRs for major cardiovascular events per 1-SD increase were 1.13 (95% CI, 1.10-1.17) for LDL-C, 1.16 (95% CI, 1.12-1.19) for non-HDL-C, and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.11-1.18) for apoB. These HRs were significantly higher for non-HDL-C than LDL-C (P = .002) and apoB (P = .02). There was no significant difference between apoB and LDL-C (P = .21). Among statin-treated patients, on-treatment levels of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and apoB were each associated with risk of future major cardiovascular events, but the strength of this association was greater for non-HDL-C than for LDL-C and apoB.