On-track Lesions Research Articles

Preoperative imaging predicts coracoid graft size and restoration of the glenoid track in Latarjet procedures

BackgroundGlenoid bone grafting procedures are often utilized to address glenoid bone loss in patients with recurrent shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative advanced imaging can accurately predict coracoid graft size and conversion of off-track to on-track Hill-Sachs lesions in patients undergoing Latarjet procedures. MethodsPatients who underwent Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability at a single institution from 2012-2020 with pre- and postoperative advanced shoulder imaging (computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans) were retrospectively reviewed. Glenoid diameter, HS interval (HSI), and measurements of the coracoid length, depth, and height were measured on preoperative imaging. Glenoid track (GT), percent glenoid bone loss, predicted restoration of glenoid track, and the difference between HSI and GT (ΔHSI-GT) were calculated. ResultsSeventeen patients with a mean age of 25± 9 years met inclusion criteria. Average glenoid bone loss preoperatively was 24± 7% and average HSI was 27 ± 5mm. The Latarjet procedure reconstructed 116 ± 8% of the native glenoid, and 104 ± 8% of the predicted diameter. Of the 15 patients that had off-track lesions preoperatively, 11 were successfully converted to on-track lesions (73%). The 4 persistent off-track lesions had a significantly higher HSI (32 ± 2 mm vs. 26 ± 4 mm, p=0.002). Preoperative measurements accurately predicted postoperative glenoid track status in 94% of cases. At a mean follow-up of 2 years, there was no significant difference in recurrence rate or rate of revision stabilization procedures between patients with on-track versus persistent off-track humeral lesions. ConclusionPreoperative advanced imaging measurements can accurately predict whether an off-track Hill-Sachs can be converted to on-track after Latarjet procedure, further enhancing shoulder stability.

P258: Does The Latarjet Procedure For Anterior Shoulder Instability Put Off-Track Lesions Back On Track: A Systematic Review

Abstract Introduction The Latarjet procedure is commonly used in the treatment of shoulder instability for high risk patients. The glenoid track is widened by fixing the coracoid to the anterior glenoid. In the presence of bipolar bone loss there is concern that the Latarjet procedure may not adequately address off-track lessions.The aim of this systematic review to assess whether the Latarjet procedure is sufficient to convert 'off-track' Hill-Sachs lesions back to 'on-track'. Methods A systematic review of Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed in October 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of post-operative 'on-track' lesions and of recurrent instability. Changes in glenoid diameter and Hill-Sachs lesion interval were also recorded. Results A total of 5 studies were included with 187 patients. Weighted mean age was 29.2 ± 2.2 years old and 90.8% of patients were male. The mean follow-up time was 26.8 months. All patients had off-track Hill-Sachs lesions pre-operatively. 88.6% of cases were converted to on-track lesions. The overall post-operative instability rate was 4.8%. The recurrence rate was significantly greater for off-track lesions (33.3%) than for on-track lesions (4.2%), odds ratio 11.4 (3.5-37.0). The weighted mean post-operative glenoid diameter change was 8.4 ± 5.8mm. The weighted mean Hill-Sachs lesion interval was 25.6 ± 4.5mm. Conclusion The Latarjet procedure results in the majority of Hill-Sachs lesions being converted to on-track lesions. However, due to bipolar bone loss approximately 1/9 cases will remain off track. In cases of failure to return on-track, there is an unacceptably high rate of recurrent instability (33.3%).

Longer peripheral-track lesions are associated with instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair

BackgroundThe Glenoid track concept has enabled the categorization of Hill-Sachs lesions (HSLs) into on-track lesions and off-track lesions. Furthermore, among the on-track lesions, further categorization has been established based on the distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track, into peripheral-track lesions and central-track lesions. Recent studies on peripheral-track lesions and central-track lesions within the glenoid track have shown inconsistencies in failure rates, which deserves further investigation. MethodsA retrospective cohort comparison of patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair between 2015 and 2020 was performed. 102 patients with peripheral-track HSLs were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on the results of the postoperative apprehension test: the apprehension positive group (n=30), and the apprehension negative group (n=72). Using preoperative computed tomography and an image reconstruction program, three-dimensional images were segmented to calculate the length, width, depth, and distance of the HSLs. A multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the risk factors of recurrence, for which odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were provided. ResultsA multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the length of the peripheral-track HSLs was a significant independent predictor of failure in this study. (OR 1.380; 95% CI 1.170–1.627; P<0.001). The receiver operating characteristics curve demonstrated a predictive power (area under the curve = 0.841) and a threshold value of 14.2 mm. ConclusionLength was the only risk factor for the recurrent instability of peripheral-track HSLs after ABR. In the context of surgical decision-making, utilizing the glenoid track concept, medical practitioners may need to evaluate instability by considering the length as a continuous factor, while differentiating between peripheral-track and central-track classifications.

Biomechanical Analysis Reveals Shoulder Instability With Bipolar Bone Loss Is Best Treated With Dynamic Anterior Stabilization for On-Track Lesions and With Remplissage for Off-Track Lesions

To compare the biomechanical effects of augmenting Bankart repair (BR) with either remplissage or dynamic anterior stabilization (DAS) in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with on-track or off-track bipolar bone loss. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested at 60° of glenohumeral abduction in the intact, injury, and repair conditions. Injury conditions included 15% glenoid bone loss with an on-track or off-track Hill-Sachs lesion as previously recommended. Repair conditions included isolated BR, BR with remplissage, and BR with DAS (long head of biceps transfer). The glenohumeral stability was assessed by measuring the anterior translation under 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 N load and maximum load without causing instability at mid-range (60°) and end-range (90°) external rotation (ER). Maximum range of motion (ROM) was measured by applying a 2.2-N·m torque in passive ER and internal rotation. Isolated BR failed to restore native glenohumeral stability in both on-track and off-track bipolar bone loss models. Both remplissage and DAS significantly decreased the anterior instability in the bipolar bone loss models, showing better restoration than the isolated BR. In the on-track lesions, DAS successfully restored native glenohumeral stability and mobility, whereas remplissage significantly decreased anterior translation without load (-2.12 ± 1.07 mm at 90° ER, P= .003; -1.98 ± 1.23 mm at 60° ER, P= .015). In the off-track lesions, remplissage restored native glenohumeral stability but led to significant ROM limitation (-8.6° ± 2.3° for internal rotation, P < .001; -13.9° ± 6.2° for ER, P= .003), whereas DAS failed to restore native stability at 90° ER regarding the increased anterior translation under 50 N (4.10 ± 1.53 mm, P < .001) and decreased maximum load (-13.8 ± 9.2 N, P= .021). At time-zero, both remplissage and DAS significantly reduced residual anterior instability compared with isolated BR in the bipolar bone loss models and restored the native glenohumeral stability under most translational loads. However, remplissage could decrease the anterior translation without load for on-track lesions and may restrict ROM for off-track lesions, whereas DAS failed to restore native stability under high translational loads for off-track lesions. DAS could be recommended to treat on-track bipolar bone loss with less biomechanical adverse effects, whereas remplissage might be the preferred procedure to address off-track bipolar bone loss for better stability.

To Remplissage or not to Remplissage Part 2: Recurrent Instability After Primary Stabilization Surgery (RIPSS) Risk Tool Assesses Preoperative Failure Rates in On-track Shoulders Undergoing Primary Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization with or without Remplissage Augmentation

Objectives: Given the high rates of recurrent instability following the initial arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR), it is crucial to provide recommendations for appropriate surgical interventions for patients at a higher risk of experiencing recurring instability. In Part 1 of the study, it was discovered that on-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL) with specific prognostic factors (i.e., younger age, increased shoulder laxity, lower DTD, and 2+ preoperative instability events) were associated with a greater risk of failure. Therefore, the objective of Part 2 was to develop a risk assessment tool that takes into account significant prognostic factors for recurrent shoulder instability following primary ABR and evaluate the role of remplissage augmentation given a patient’s risk profile. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of consecutive patients aged 14-40 who underwent either ABR (arthroscopic Bankart repair) or ABR+R (ABR with remplissage) procedures between 2013 and 2021 for anterior glenohumeral instability. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine the values of glenoid bone loss, Hills-Sachs Interval (HSI), glenoid track (GT), and distance-to-dislocation (DTD). On-track lesions have a distance-to-dislocation (DTD) value greater than zero. In addition, within the category of on-track lesions, there is a subset known as “near-track” lesions, with a DTD ranging from 0 to 10 mm. Capsuloligamentous laxity scores were categorized according to hyperlaxity status, defined as external rotation greater than 85 degrees and/or grade 2+ posterior and inferior load-and-shift on examination under anesthesia. Recurrent shoulder instability was defined as recurrent dislocation and/or subjective subluxation postoperatively. Patients were excluded if the indexed surgery was a revision procedure, &lt; 2-year follow-up, or glenoid bone loss (GBL) &gt;20%. A final multivariate survival analysis was constructed using categorical prognostic factors (i.e., patient age, “near-track” status, hyperlaxity, and 2+ preoperative instability episodes) identified in Part 1, while adjusting for GBL. Although contact athlete status was not identified as a significant predictor of recurrent shoulder instability in Part 1, the final model stratified by contact athlete status given its established importance in prior literature. Multivariate hazard ratio estimates were utilized to create a risk assessment tool and correlated with patient-specific risk estimates via post-estimation analysis. Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients were included for analysis (ABR: 116 | ABR+R: 39) with an average age of 21.6 ± 6.2 years and an average follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.0 years (range: 2.0 – 8.7 yrs). Patients with near-track lesions had a three-fold higher risk of recurrent instability (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.5, p = 0.03) compared to on-track HSL with DTD &gt; 10mm. Individuals with evidence of hyperlaxity exhibited a five-fold increased risk (HR: 5.4, p=0.03) relative to patients without hyperlaxity. Younger patient groups had twice the risk of recurrent shoulder instability (HR: 2.2, p=0.003) compared to older adjacent groups. Patients with two or more preoperative recurrent instability episodes faced a four-times greater risk (HR: 4.2, p=0.004) for recurrent shoulder instability compared to patients who experienced a single instability event preoperatively. Lastly, patients who underwent primary ABR only had almost 10-times greater risk of recurrent shoulder instability (HR: 9.5, p=0.002) than those who underwent primary ABR+R. The Recurrent Instability after Primary Shoulder Stabilization (RIPSS) risk assessment score considers patient age, near-track status, hyperlaxity, preoperative instability episodes, and surgical technique (ABR vs. ABR+R) as important prognostic indicators, Table 2. The RIPSS score was created with risk stratifying subgroups: Low-risk (0 – 2), Moderate-risk (3 – 6), High-risk (7 – 9), and Extreme-risk (10+). Figure 1 illustrates a strong correlation between patient RIPSS scores with patient-specific hazard ratio estimates derived from the multivariate Cox regression modeling computed in “To Remplissage or not to Remplissage Part 1”. According to RIPSS score subgroups, recurrent shoulder instability rates range from 4.3% among low-risk groups to 54.6% among extreme-risk groups, Figure 1. Conclusions: Patients with a low-risk RIPSS score without ABR+R may not benefit from remplissage augmentation. Their risk for recurrent instability would remain low despite the addition of remplissage. However, patients with a high- or extreme-risk RIPSS score prior to considering ARB+R would likely benefit from remplissage supplementation. The RIPSS score may be an effective risk assessment tool that may help identify patients who may benefit from a primary Bankart repair with remplissage augmentation. The risk assessment tool developed may optimize surgical treatment and allow physicians to determine patient risk scores with and without remplissage augmentation.

To Remplissage or Not to Remplissage Part 1: Prognostic Factors Influencing Recurrent Shoulder Instability in High-Risk Individuals with On-Track Shoulders Undergoing Primary Arthroscopic Anterior Stabilization

Objectives: Recent studies have shown that a subset of on-track Hill-Sachs lesions (HSL), defined as near-track lesions, may have a high risk of failure after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate rates of recurrent shoulder instability among patients with on-track HSL who underwent primary ABR with and without remplissage in the setting of numerous risk factors highlighted in recent literature. We hypothesized that primary ABR with remplissage (ABR+R) would lower postoperative rates of recurrent shoulder instability, particularly for “high-risk” patients defined as “near-track” lesions, hyperlaxity, younger age, contact athletes, and &gt;1 preoperative instability episodes. Methods: Prospectively collected data was retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients aged 14-40 years who underwent either ABR or ABR+R between 2013 and 2021 for anterior glenohumeral instability. Glenoid bone loss, Hills-Sachs Interval (HSI), glenoid track (GT), and distance-to-dislocation (DTD) values (DTD = GT-HSI) were determined via preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Additionally, “near-track” lesions are a subset of on-track lesions with a DTD from 0 – 10mm. Capsuloligamentous laxity (i.e., hyperlaxity) was defined as external rotation greater than 85 degrees and/or grade 2+ posterior and inferior load-and-shift on examination under anesthesia. Recurrent shoulder instability was defined as recurrent dislocation and/or subjective subluxation postoperatively. Patients were excluded if the indexed surgery was a revision procedure, &lt; 2-year follow-up, or glenoid bone loss (GBL) &gt;20%. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine predictors of recurrent shoulder instability and reoperation. Results: One-hundred-and-fifty-five patients were included for analysis (ABR: 116 | ABR+R: 39) with an average age of 21.6 ± 6.2 years and an average follow-up of 5.1 ± 2.0 years (range: 2.0 – 8.7 yrs). Overall, 30 patients (19%) experienced recurrent shoulder instability postoperatively (4.3 per 100 person-years), and 20 (13%) underwent secondary surgery (2.9 per 100 person-years) for revision stabilization. Among the 116 patients who underwent primary ABR only, 27 (23.3%) experienced recurrent shoulder instability, compared with only three of the 39 ABR+R patients (7.7%). Risk factors assessed included: age, gender, sport, number of preoperative instability episodes, shoulder laxity, GBL, and DTD. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that younger age (p=0.003), increased shoulder laxity (p=0.010), 2+ episodes of preoperative instability episodes (p=0.009), and a lower DTD (p=0.046) were independent risk factors for recurrent shoulder instability postoperatively. However, contact athlete status was not identified as a significant predictor of recurrent shoulder instability. According to multivariate results, patients who underwent primary ABR only were roughly 9-times more likely to experience recurrent shoulder instability (HR: 8.7, p=0.002) and 7-times more likely to undergo reoperation (HR:6.8, p=0.019) than those who underwent primary ABR+R. When considering patients with three or more risk factors (i.e., “near-track” lesions, hyperlaxity, age &lt; 25, or 2+ preoperative instability episodes), 9 of 12 ABR patients (75%) and 2 of 16 ABR+R (13%) experienced recurrent shoulder instability (p = 0.001), Table 1. Survival rates for ABR only versus ABR+R for patients with three or more risk factors are plotted in Figure 1 using Kaplan-Meier survival plots. Conclusions: Arthroscopic primary Bankart repair with remplissage may be an effective approach for decreasing the likelihood of recurrent shoulder instability and the need for secondary surgery among patients with on-track HSL. This surgical approach is especially beneficial for patients with lower DTD, increased shoulder laxity, younger age, or 2+ preoperative instability episodes in a dose-dependent manner. Those with higher risks of recurrence may benefit significantly more with the addition of a remplissage than those with fewer risk factors.

Defining Critical Humeral Bone Loss: Inferior Craniocaudal Hill-Sachs Extension as Predictor of Recurrent Instability After Primary Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Background: The glenoid track concept for shoulder instability primarily describes the medial-lateral relationship between a Hill-Sachs lesion and the glenoid. However, the Hill-Sachs position in the craniocaudal dimension has not been thoroughly studied. Hypothesis: Hill-Sachs lesions with greater inferior extension are associated with increased risk of recurrent instability after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: The authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (without remplissage) between 2007 and 2019 and had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Recurrent instability was defined as recurrent dislocation or subluxation after the index procedure. The craniocaudal position of the Hill-Sachs lesion was measured against the midhumeral axis on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using either a Hill-Sachs bisecting line through the humeral head center (sagittal midpoint angle [SMA], a measure of Hill-Sachs craniocaudal position) or a line tangent to the inferior Hill-Sachs edge (lower-edge angle [LEA], a measure of Hill-Sachs caudal extension). Univariate and multivariate regression were used to determine the predictive value of both SMA and LEA for recurrent instability. Results: In total, 176 patients were included with a mean age of 20.6 years, mean follow-up of 5.9 years, and contact sport participation of 69.3%. Of these patients, 42 (23.9%) experienced recurrent instability (30 dislocations, 12 subluxations) at a mean time of 1.7 years after surgery. Recurrent instability was found to be significantly associated with LEA >90° (ie, Hill-Sachs lesions extending below the humeral head equator), with an OR of 3.29 (P = .022). SMA predicted recurrent instability to a lesser degree (OR, 2.22; P = .052). Post hoc evaluation demonstrated that LEA >90° predicted recurrent dislocations (subset of recurrent instability) with an OR of 4.80 (P = .003). LEA and SMA were found to be collinear with Hill-Sachs interval and distance to dislocation, suggesting that greater LEA and SMA proportionally reflect lesion severity in both the craniocaudal and medial-lateral dimensions. Conclusion: Inferior extension of an otherwise on-track Hill-Sachs lesion is a highly predictive risk factor for recurrent instability after primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. Evaluation of Hill-Sachs extension below the humeral equator (inferior equatorial extension) on sagittal MRI is a clinically facile screening tool for higher-risk lesions with subcritical glenoid bone loss. This threshold for critical humeral bone loss may inform surgical stratification for procedures such as remplissage or other approaches for at-risk on-track lesions.

Paper 05: Inferior Hill-Sachs Position Predicts Failure Following Primary Bankart Repair for On-Track Lesions

Objectives: The on-track/off-track concept for shoulder instability primarily describes the medial-lateral rotational relationship between an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion and a Bankart defect. Though clinically more protective, on-track lesions retain some risk for failure following primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. While some of this risk can be explained by the “near-track” concept, the role of the superior-inferior position of the Hill-Sachs lesion has never been studied in the context of failure of primary Bankart repair. This study aims to identify the relationship between the superior-inferior position of a Hill-Sachs lesion and risk for failure following primary arthroscopic bankart repair. Our hypothesis is that inferiorly-based Hill-Sachs lesions may engage with the arm in neutral and thus be higher risk for failure following primary Bankart repair. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 201 individuals with on track lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair (without remplissage) between 2007 and 2019 who have minimum 2 year follow-up. Patients with failure were defined as those who sustained a dislocation or subluxation after the index procedure. A pre-operative sagittal MRI cut showing the maximum Hill-Sachs diameter was used for position analysis. Sagittal position of the Hill-Sachs was defined the angle formed by the Hill-Sachs bisecting line through the humeral head center, against the mid-humeral axis on a sagittal MRI cut (Figure 1); for example, an angle of 0 is twelve o’clock on the humeral head, while an angle of 90 is equatorial. We defined a priori four Hill-Sachs quadrants for semi-quantitative analysis, based on physiologic arm positions: Superior (angle &lt; 40), Mid-Superior (40-60), Mid (61-90), and Inferior (&gt;90). Hill-Sachs quadrants were then correlated against failure following primary arthroscopic Bankart repair. Results: Failure rates following arthroscopic bankart repair as it relates to superior-inferior position of the Hill-Sachs lesion is as follows (Table 1): No Hill-Sachs (10 of 73, 13.7%), Superior (0 of 7, 0%), mid-superior (6 of 36, 16.7%), Mid (19 of 71, 26.8%), and Inferior (1 of 6, 16.7%). We grouped Hill-Sachs lesions into low grade (No Hill-Sachs, Superior, and Mid-Superior quadrants) and high grade (Mid and Inferior quadrants). Low grade represented a 13.8% risk of failure, while High grade represented a 26% risk for failure (p=0.034). Conclusions: The superior-inferior sagittal position of a Hill-Sachs lesion may contribute to risk for failure of primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for on-track lesions. Inferiorly-based Hill-Sachs lesions may risk engagement at lower degrees of arm abduction, and in our study represent nearly double the risk of failure of arthroscopic Bankart repair as compared to superior Hill-Sachs positions. [Table: see text]

Paper 01: Distance-to-Dislocation Predicts Recurrent Dislocation and Return-to-Sport Following Latarjet

Objectives: More recently, the glenoid track has been described as a continuum rather than a binary “on-track/off-track” concept. “Distance to dislocation” (DTD), which defines how far an on-track lesion is from being off-track, has proven to be a strong predictor for recurrent dislocation following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Risk of recurrent instability following a Latarjet as it relates to DTD, however, is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if DTD is a predictor of recurrent dislocation and return-to-sport/work (RTS). We hypothesized higher DTD values would correlate with lower failure rates and higher rates of RTS. Methods: We retrospectively identified 106 consecutive patients who underwent a Latarjet between 2012 and 2022. Glenoid bone loss, Hills-Sachs Interval (HSI), glenoid track (GT), and DTD ( DTD = GT – HSI) were determined from preoperative MRIs. On-track shoulders corresponded with positive DTD values, while off-track shoulders revealed negative DTD values. Relatedly, the more positive or negative the DTD value, the more on-track or off-track the shoulder. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were utilized to evaluate the association between recurrent dislocation, patient demographics, and DTD. Using parametric survival analysis, we evaluated the association between RTS, demographics, and DTD. Results: Seventeen patients (16%) experienced recurrent dislocations. Our cohort was 70% male with an average follow-up of 1.5 years. Patient age (p=0.035), revision status (p=0.033), and DTD (p=0.005) were significant predictors of reoperation on univariate analysis. After adjusting for confounders, only DTD (p=0.043) remained a significant predictor of recurrent instability, Figure 1. Regarding RTS, patient age (p=0.14), sex (p=0.029), and DTD (p&lt;0.0005) were predictive of RTS on univariate analysis. After adjusting for covariates, we observed an interaction between patient age and DTD (p=0.036). More specifically, older patients have a more prolonged RTS at lower DTD values compared to younger patients, Figure 2. Conclusions: Regardless of on-track vs off-track status, DTD is a useful variable in the work-up of patients undergoing Latarjet reconstruction. Lower DTD values are predictive of higher rates of recurrent instability and lower rates of RTS, especially in older patients.

Anatomic risk factors for arthroscopic Bankart repair failure: A case-control study comparing failure and non-failure groups in an Asian population

IntroductionPost-arthroscopic Bankart repair failure/re-dislocation rates are influenced by several risk factors, including anatomic defects. There is limited evidence on the role of anatomic defects, especially for Hill-Sachs size in on-track lesions. This study aimed to assess glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesion and labral tear size and evaluate their contribution to post-operative instability after a primary repair. Material and methodsAcross 169 patients with on-track Bankart lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair from 2010 to 2015, this study matched 14 failure with 14 non-failure cases based on age/gender. Patient demographics, pre-operative radiological parameters (including size of glenoid bone loss and Hill-Sachs lesion) and labral tear size were compared between the failure and non-failure groups. ResultAll patients were male with a mean age of 21.01 ± 4.97. Significantly greater glenoid bone loss (p = 0.024) and labral tear size (p = 0.039) were found in the failure group. However, there was no significant difference in mean volume of Hill-Sachs lesion between the two groups (p = 0.739). ConclusionExtensive glenoid bone loss and labral tears are risk factors for post-arthroscopic Bankart failure. However, the size of Hill-Sachs lesion is not a risk factor for failure, in a specific group of on-track Hill-Sachs lesions. Level of evidenceRetrospective Study, Level IV.

"Nearly off-track lesions" or a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track does not seem to be accurate in predicting recurrence after an arthroscopic Bankart repair in a military population: a case-control study.

On-track lesions with a short distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track (nearly off-track) may predispose recurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) in the general population. The aim of this study was to determine if a shorter distance between the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion and the medial edge of the glenoid track could accurately predict recurrence after an ABR in a high-demand military population. It was hypothesized that a shorter distance would not accurately predict recurrence. A retrospective monocenter case-control study was performed at the Dutch Central Military Hospital. Patients with an on-track Hill-Sachs lesion who underwent a primary ABR between 2014 and 2019 with a minimal follow-up of 2 years and a preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment received a questionnaire. The primary outcome was recurrence, defined as a complete dislocation or subluxation. Glenoid bone loss was assessed using a linear-based method on MRI. The distance from the medial edge of the Hill-Sachs lesion to the medial edge of the glenoid track was defined as the distance to dislocation (DTD). A receiver operating characteristic curve was created to determine the predictive value of the DTD for recurrence. Logistic regression was used to determine preoperative risk factors that predispose recurrence. Covariates were selected based on univariable analysis and included gender, body mass index, age at surgery and first dislocation, laterality, smoking habits, overhead shoulder activity during work, preoperative dislocations, sports type and level, bony or labral lesions on MRI, and DTD. In total, 80 patients with an average follow-up of 4.8±1.9 years completed the questionnaire and were included in the analyses. Seventeen patients (21%) experienced recurrence at the final follow-up. No difference in DTD was observed among patients who experienced recurrence (9 ± 4 mm) compared with patients who did not (9 ± 5 mm; P=.81). The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated no predictive power of DTD for recurrence (area under the curve=0.49). Smoking at the time of surgery (odds ratio: 3.9; confidence interval: 1.2-12.7; P=.02) and overhead shoulder movement during work (odds ratio: 9.3; confidence interval: 1.1-78.0; P=.04) were associated with recurrence according to the logistic regression analysis. A shorter DTD demonstrated no accuracy in predicting recurrence in a military population. Smoking at the time of surgery and overhead shoulder activity during work were associated with recurrence; however, these analyses were underpowered to draw valid conclusions.

Paper 01: Capsuloligamentous Laxity is a Risk Factor for Failure in Near Track Lesions Following Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization

Objectives: Recurrent anterior shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair presents a challenging clinical problem, with the primary stabilization procedure often portending the best chance for clinical success. While the glenoid track concept continues to evolve, a limitation of the glenoid track is that it relies on bony anatomy without specific considerations for capsuloligamentous integrity or the effect that capsular laxity may have on the glenohumeral contact points throughout shoulder range of motion. The purpose of the study was to determine if capsuloligamentous laxity has a modifying effect on the glenoid track, specifically for on-track lesions with a small distance to dislocation (DTD) from being an off-track lesion or the so-called “near-track” lesion. This may explain why some on-track lesions are at an increased risk of recurrent instability. We hypothesized that patients with ligamentous laxity and “near track” lesions would be at increased risk of recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Methods: Consecutive patients with on-track Hill-Sachs lesions who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair alone without remplissage for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability between January 2007 and December 2015 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with less than 2-year follow up, glenoid bone loss &gt; 20%, off-track lesions, concomitant remplissage, and atraumatic instability were excluded. Determination of shoulder laxity was based on exam under anesthesia (EUA), including anterior load and shift, posterior load and shift, and sulcus testing at the time of surgery before arthroscopy. Capsuloligamentous shoulder hyperlaxity was defined as external rotation of &gt;85o and/or grade of 2+ or greater load and shift in two or more planes. Measurements of glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs interval (HSI), and glenoid track (GT) were performed based on prior described methods. DTD was calculated (DTD=GT-HSI, with DTD&gt;0 classified as on-track lesions). Near track lesions were defined as 0&lt;DTD&lt;8mm. Failure was defined as recurrent dislocation. Results: A total of 173 patients were initially identified, of which 151 met inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. 72.8% of patients were males and mean age was 20.1 ± 5.7 years. Patients were divided into two groups based on shoulder laxity; group 1 consisted of 74 patients with hyperlaxity, and group 2 consisted of 77 patients without hyperlaxity. Overall, 21 patients (13.9%) sustained a recurrent dislocation and 35 patients (23.2%) had recurrent instability episodes. Failure was associated with glenoid bone loss (p&lt;0.001 ), longer HS length ( p=0.007), occurrence of &gt;1 instability episode preoperatively (p=0.018 ), and smaller DTD ( p=0.0008). Hyperlaxity was associated with the use of more anchors ( p=0.0001). Shoulder laxity was not independently predictive of overall failure (Figure 1, p=0.18); however, DTD was significantly associated with failure risk and recurrent instability in patients with hyperlaxity ( p=0.006) specifically in younger patients with hyperlaxity (Figure 1, Table 1). Conclusions: Our study suggests that while capsuloligamentous laxity is not independently predictive of failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair for on-track lesions, laxity may play a significant role in clinical outcomes in patients with a small DTD or near-track lesions. In younger patients with near-track lesions, hyperlaxity may be particularly predictive of failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair. As our understanding of the glenoid track continues to evolve, surgeons may need to consider the track concept as a continuum with evolving surgical algorithms other than an arthroscopic Bankart alone in young patients with near track lesions and hyperlaxity. [Table: see text]

Glenoid Track Width Is Smaller Under Dynamic Conditions: An In Vivo Dual-Fluoroscopy Imaging Study

Background: The glenoid track concept has been widely used to assess the risk of instability due to bipolar bone loss. The glenoid track width was commonly used as 83% of the glenoid width to determine if a lesion was on-track or off-track. However, the value was obtained under static conditions, and it may not be able to reflect the actual mechanism of traumatic dislocation during motion. Purpose: To compare the glenoid track width under dynamic and static conditions using a dual-fluoroscopic imaging system. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: In total, 40 shoulders of 20 healthy volunteers were examined for both dynamic and static tests within a dual-fluoroscopic imaging system at 5 different arm positions: 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of abduction, keeping the shoulder at 90° of external rotation. The participants performed a fast horizontal arm backswing for dynamic tests while keeping their arm in maximum horizontal extension for static tests. Computed tomography scans were used to create 3-dimensional models of the humerus and scapula for 2-dimensional to 3-dimensional image registration. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained to delineate the medial margin of the rotator cuff insertion. The glenoid track width was measured as the distance from the anterior rim of the glenoid to the medial margin of the rotator cuff insertion and compared between static and dynamic conditions. Results: The mean glenoid track widths at 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of abduction were significantly smaller under dynamic conditions (88%, 81%, 72%, 69%, and 68% of the glenoid width) than those under static conditions (101%, 92%, 84%, 78%, and 77% of the glenoid width) (all P < .001). The glenoid track width significantly decreased with the increasing abduction angles in the range of 30° to 120° under static conditions (all P < .003) and 30° to 90° under dynamic conditions (all P < .001). Conclusion: A smaller dynamic-based value should be considered for the glenoid track width when distinguishing on-track/off-track lesions. Clinical evidence is needed to establish the superiority of the dynamic-based value over the static-based value as an indicator for augmentation procedures. Clinical Relevance: Some off-track lesions might be misclassified as on-track lesions when the original commonly used static-based value of 83% is used as the glenoid track width.

Long-term recurrence rate in anterior shoulder instability after Bankart repair based on the on- and off-track concept

Since its first proposal, the concept of on- and off-track lesions in anterior shoulder instability has gained clinical relevance as a tool to predict the failure rate of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Current literature only reports either short-term follow-up or long-term results of small sample sizes. The aim of this study was to provide a long-term evaluation of recurrent instability following arthroscopic Bankart repair in a large cohort using the on-track vs. off-track concept as a predictor for failure. We retrospectively analyzed 271 patients who underwent primary arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability between 1998 and 2007. All patients with a minimum follow-up of 78 months and a preoperative computed tomographic (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan were included into the study. Preoperative CT and/or MRI scans were used to determine the glenoid track and width of Hill-Sachs lesion. Recurrence of instability was defined as presence of instability symptoms (dislocation, subluxation, and/or apprehension) or revision surgery (stabilization procedure) and was assessed as the primary outcome parameter. The glenoid track of 163 shoulders was assessed (female n=51, malen =112) with a mean follow-up of 124 months (99.4-145.6, standard deviation=2.5) and a mean age of 24 years (20-34.). An off-track Hill-Sachs lesion was found in 77 cases (47%), and in 86 cases (53 %) it was on-track. The rate of recurrent instability in the off-track group was 74% (n=57) compared with 27% (n=23) in the on-track group (P < .001). The overall rate of revision surgery due to instability was 29% (n=48) after a mean time of 50.9 months (±42.8) following Bankart repair. The rate of revision surgery in the off-track group was 48% (n=37) after a mean of 53.5 months (±42.0) vs. 13% (n=11) after 42.3 months (±46.3) in the on-track group (P < .001). This study shows that the on- and off-track concept helps to distinguish patients for whom an isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair yields long-term benefits. Because of the high rate of recurrent instability in the off-track group, an off-track lesion should be treated surgically in such a way that the off-track lesion is converted into an on-track lesion.

High rate of return to sport and excellent patient-reported outcomes after an open Latarjet procedure.

The purpose of this study was to report return to sport, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), subjective outcomes, and complications or failures in patients who underwent open Latarjet surgery. Patients who underwent open Latarjet surgery performed by 2 fellowship-trained surgeons between August 2006 and November 2018 were included. Prospectively collected data were reviewed. Recurrent instability and revision surgical procedures were recorded. Subjective outcomes included return to sport and fear of reinjury or activity modification as a result of patients' instability history. PROs included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Short Form 12 Physical Component Summary score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, and satisfaction. Age, sex, sports participation, pain, primary vs. revision surgery (prior failed arthroscopic or open Bankart repair), dislocation number, glenoid bone loss, glenoid track concept, and projected glenoid track were evaluated. Failure was defined as an ASES score <70, recurrent dislocation, or revision instability surgery. A total of 126 shoulders (125 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 28.1 years (range, 15-57 years). Of 126 shoulders, 7 (5.5%) underwent additional procedures prior to final follow-up and were excluded from outcome analyses; failure occurred in 6 of these shoulders. Mean follow-up data at 3.7 years (range, 2-9.3 years) were attained in 86.6% of patients (103 of 119). All PROs significantly improved from preoperative baseline (ASES score, from 69.7 to 90.2; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, from 55.8 to 85.9; and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, from 28.4 to 10.5). PROs did not differ based on sex, sports participation type, dislocation with or without sports, primary vs. revision procedure, and preoperative dislocation number. No correlations existed between PROs and age, glenoid bone loss, or number of previous surgical procedures. On-track lesions (50 of 105, 47.6%) and projected on-track lesions (90 of 105, 85.7%) correlated with better patient satisfaction but not PROs. Despite not having recurrences, 63 of 99 patients (63.6%) reported activity modifications and 44 of 99 patients (44.4%) feared reinjury. These groups had statistically worse PROs, although the minimal clinically important difference was not met. Return to sport was reported by 97% of patients (86 of 89), with 74% (66 of 89) returning at the same level or slightly below the preinjury level. Revision stabilization surgery was required 6 of 126 cases (4.8%), and 6 of 103 shoulders (5.8%) had ASES scores <70. The open Latarjet procedure led to significant improvements in all PROs, and overall, 97% of patients returned to sport. Fear of reinjury and activity modifications were common after open Latarjet procedures but did not appear to affect clinical outcomes. On-track and projected on-track measurements correlated with better patient satisfaction but not improved PROs.

The Glenoid Track Concept: On-Track and Off-Track—A Narrative Review

Shoulder instability is described as a functional deficiency caused by excessive mobility of the humeral head over the glenoid. Various Glenohumeral Instability (GI) types have been described, but the traumatic anteroinferior form is the most frequent. The differences between engaging and non-engaging Hill–Sachs lesions (HSLs) are linked to bone loss assessment. On the contrary, the novel difference between “on-track” and “off-track” lesions is strictly related to surgical techniques. The specific involvement of glenoid and humerus bone defects in recurrent GI was poorly assessed in the literature before the glenoid-track concept (GT). Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Arthro-MRI have been widely used to identify and characterize lesions to the ligamentous structures. However, only new technologies (3 Tesla MRI) accurately detect HSLs. On the contrary, Computed Tomography (CT) has been adopted to quantify glenoid bone deficit. The GT concept is a valuable tool for evaluating anterior shoulder instability in patients. Shoulders out of alignment may require more than just an arthroscopic Bankart, and a remplissage or bone transfer may be necessary. Specifically, isolated Bankart repair should be considered in patients with recurrent instability and an on-track lesion with less than 25% glenoid bone loss. In off-track lesions and less than 25% glenoid bone loss, remplissage should be used. Bone transplant surgery is required for patients with a glenoid bone defect of more than 25%. This narrative review aims to report the most updated findings on “on-track” and “off-track” lesions in GI.

Paper 70: "Distance to Dislocation" as a Predictor of Surgical Failure Following Primary Arthroscopic Anterior Labral Repair: Rethinking the Glenoid Track Concept

Objectives:Larger amounts of bipolar bone loss have a strong association with shoulder re-dislocation following arthroscopic labral repair. Development of the Glenoid Track (GT) concept has helped propose bone loss cut-offs for shoulders that should not be managed with arthroscopic labral repair alone. Recent literature has suggested the use of the glenoid track as a continuous variable rather than a binary “on-track/off-track” concept. The re-dislocation risk for “on-track” shoulders with smaller distances to dislocation (DTD), or “near-track” shoulders, has not been previously described. We hypothesized that decreasing DTD, or on-track lesions approaching an off-track lesion, would result in an increased risk of failure following arthroscopic Bankart repair alone.Methods:We performed a retrospective analysis of 197 patients who had undergone primary arthroscopic anterior labral repair between 2007 and 2019 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Glenoid bone loss using a perfect-circle method and Hills-Sachs (HS) interval, were measured from pre-operative MRIs. GT was calculated using previously described methods. Surgical failure was defined as a patient who re-dislocated their shoulder following surgery. DTD was calculated by subtracting the HS measurement from the GT calculation. Patients with “off-track” lesions (negative DTD), and those who had undergone a concomitant arthroscopic remplissage were excluded. We performed a logistical regression model to evaluate the relationship between surgical failure and DTD, glenoid bone loss, Hill-Sachs lesion size, number of anchors used, and patient age. We then created a risk estimator tool that calculates the risk of dislocation with DTD as a continuous variable.Results:Twenty-eight patients (14%) sustained recurrent shoulder dislocations following anterior shoulder labral repair. Average follow up was 7.8 years and there were no demographic differences between those with recurrence and those without (p>0.05). All patients had less than 25% glenoid bone loss (range 0-23%). Increased DTD (p < 0.0005) and glenoid bone loss (p < 0.0005) were independent predictors of surgical failure. After adjusting for glenoid bone loss and patient age, logistic regression modeling showed that for every 1mm decrease in DTD, there was an associated 13.6% increase in re-dislocation risk (p = 0.003). Patient age, Hill-Sachs length, participation in collision sports, and number of anchors used were not significantly associated with failure risk (p>0.05). A DTD <10mm had a 4.26 times greater odds of failure compared to those with DTD >10mm (OR 4.26; 95% CI 1.57-11.65; p = 0.005). The risk estimator tool developed using a logistic regression modeling demonstrated a 19% risk of failure for DTD 10mm, 26% risk for DTD 8mm, 36% risk for DTD 6mm, 49% risk for DTD 4mm, and 67% risk for DTD 2mm after adjusting for glenoid bone loss and patient age (Figure 1).Conclusions:The main finding of this study was that on-track lesions approaching off-track lesions, the so-called “near track” lesions, are associated with an exponentially increased risk of recurrent dislocation following primary arthroscopic anterior stabilization with labral repair alone. Furthermore, DTD values of <10mm were associated with the highest odds ratios for failure and were 4 times more likely to fail than for patients with DTD values >10mm. All of the patients included in this analysis had “on-track” shoulder lesions and <25% glenoid bone loss. Historically, these values have been identified as “cut-offs” used to identify patients who can be treated successfully with arthroscopic labral repair without a remplissage or other augmentation. DTD is a simple calculation for bipolar bone loss that can be used to predict risk of recurrent dislocation. Our results demonstrate potential pitfalls in making treatment decisions for bipolar bone loss using a binary “on-track, off-track” construct. Rather, the glenoid track concept applied as a continuum may be more useful for optimizing treatment.“On-track” shoulder lesions <10mm with diminishing DTD have a substantially higher risk of surgical failure with arthroscopic labral repair alone. As the DTD approaches 0mm (“off track lesion”), the risk of failure increases exponentially. When making treatment decisions for shoulder instability, bipolar bone loss should be viewed as a continuum rather than discreet “on-track, off-track” entities. For high-risk patients with a DTD approaching 0mm, additional augmentation with remplissage or open approaches should be considered.DTD can be used to estimate patient’s risk of recurrent dislocation following primary arthroscopic anterior labral repair for treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Application of this calculation would help surgeons decide the best surgical treatment for patients following anterior shoulder dislocation and can be particularly valuable for high risk patients. Understanding the association between lower DTD values and failure can also help inform the surgeon and patient regarding the risks and benefits of available treatment options.

Poster 170: Preoperative Advanced Imaging Predicts Coracoid Graft Size and Restoration of the Glenoid Track in Patients Undergoing Latarjet Procedures

Objectives:The Latarjet procedure is commonly used in management of anterior shoulder instability with bipolar bone deficiency. Persistent off-track Hill-Sachs (HS) lesions after Latarjet procedure is associated with significantly higher rates of failure and recurrent instability. Preoperative prediction of which lesions will remain off-track is crucial for improving outcomes and decreasing failure rates. The purpose of this study was to determine if preoperative advanced imaging can predict coracoid graft size and conversion of off-track to on-track Hill-Sachs lesions in patients undergoing Latarjet procedures.Methods:Patients who underwent Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability at a single institution from 2012-2020 were evaluated. Inclusion criteria consisted of pre- and post-operative advanced imaging - computerized topography or magnetic resonance imaging. Glenoid diameter, HS interval (HSI), and coracoid length, depth, and height were measured on preoperative imaging. Glenoid track (GT), percent glenoid bone loss, predicted restoration of glenoid track, and the difference between HSI and GT (DHSI-GT) were calculated. These values were then compared with postoperative measurements of the glenoid diameter and coracoid graft width and height.Results:Seventeen patients with a mean age of 24.6 ± 8.6 years met inclusion criteria. The average glenoid bone loss preoperatively was 23.6 ± 7.3% and the average HSI was 27.2 ± 4.9mm. The Latarjet procedure was able to reconstruct 115.8 ± 7.6% of the native glenoid, and 103.8 ± 7.9% of the predicted diameter. Of the 15 patients that had off-track lesions preoperatively, 11 were successfully converted to on-track lesions (73.3%). The 4 lesions that remained off-track postoperatively had a significantly higher HSI (32.4 ± 2.4 mm vs. 25.6 ± 4.3 mm, p=0.002) and 3 of these had insufficient coracoid graft to convert to an on-track lesion based on the preoperative DHSI-GT values in comparison to coracoid graft size. Preoperative measurements accurately predicted postoperative glenoid track status 94.1% of cases.Conclusions:The Latarjet procedure was able to reconstruct 115.8 ± 7.6% of the native glenoid and converted 73.3% of off-track lesions to on-track lesions. The glenoid was reconstructed to 103.8 ± 7.9% of the predicted diameter. Preoperative advanced imaging measurements accurately predicted graft size, restoration of the glenoid track, and ability to convert off-track to on-track lesions.

Consideration May Be Given to Lowering the Threshold for the Addition of Remplissage in Patients With Subcritical Glenoid Bone Loss Undergoing Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

PurposeTreatment for patients with anterior glenohumeral instability with subcritical bone loss is evolving. The purpose of this study was to compare 2-year outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair with and without Hill–Sachs remplissage in patients with <15% glenoid bone loss.MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was performed on a consecutive series of patients who underwent primary isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair (IBR) or arthroscopic Bankart repair with remplissage (REMP) by 4 shoulder specialists between 2013 and 2019. Range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected at baseline and 2 years postoperative: Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale for pain. Recurrence, return to sport, satisfaction, complications, and revisions also were reviewed.ResultsA total of 123 patients were available, including 75 IBR and 48 REMP. Baseline demographics, activity, ROM, and PROs were similar. Mean glenoid bone loss (2.5% vs 6.1%: P < .001) was greater in REMP, although the number of on-track lesions was similar (98.7% vs 93.8%: P = .298). WOSI scores were improved for REMP (196.5 vs 42.7: P = .004), but otherwise no difference in postoperative PROs or ROM. Differences between cohorts did not reach significance in return to sport (73% vs 83%: P = .203), recurrence (9.3% vs 2.1%: P = .148), or revisions (6.8% vs 2.1%: P = .403). For on-track lesions there were 6 recurrences in IBR (6 of 74; 8.1%) and 1 recurrence in REMP (1 of 45; 2.2%).ConclusionsDespite slightly worse pathology, patients with subcritical bone loss who undergo REMP experience similar short-term postoperative function to isolated IBR. Recurrence, revision, and return to sport favored REMP but this study was underpowered to show statistical significance. Recurrence was common following IBR, despite subcritical glenoid bone loss and primarily on-track lesions, suggesting that REMP can be considered in on-track lesions.Level of EvidenceIII, retrospective comparative study.

Association Between Excessive Joint Laxity and a Wider Hill-Sachs Lesion in Anterior Shoulder Instability

Background: Excessive general joint laxity, a negative prognostic factor in joint instability, has not been studied to determine its relationship with bipolar bone loss in anterior shoulder instability. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of bipolar bone defects in the presence of excessive joint laxity and the clinical outcomes based on the on-track/off-track theory. We hypothesized that (1) patients with excessive joint laxity might have less significant bipolar bone defects compared with those without excessive joint laxity and (2) no significant difference would be found in the clinical outcomes, including recurrence rate. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included 81 patients who had undergone arthroscopic Bankart repair, with (group L; n = 33) or without (group N; n = 48) excessive joint laxity. The presence of excessive joint laxity was defined as a score of ≥4 using Beighton and Horan criteria preoperatively. Bipolar bone lesions were assessed using preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography. Additional remplissage was performed for cases with off-track or positive engagement test in borderline on-track lesions. The functional outcomes at the 2-year follow-up were assessed using the recurrence rate, Subjective Shoulder Value, Rowe score, University of California Los Angeles shoulder score, active range of motion, and the sports/recreation activity level. Results: No significant difference was found in the glenoid bone defect between groups (14.1%, group L; 14.4%, group N). Off-track lesions were identified in 39.4% (13/33) of group L and 14.6% (7/48) of group N (P = .011). The mean Hill-Sachs interval to glenoid track ratio was 83.1% in group L and 75.2% in group N (P = .021). Additional remplissage procedures were more frequently performed in group L (48.5%; 16/33) than in group N (16.7%; 8/48) (P = .002). However, no significant difference was observed in the shoulder functional scores and recurrence rates between the groups. Conclusion: Patients with anterior shoulder instability and excessive joint laxity had significantly wider Hill-Sachs lesions and more off-track lesions than did those with normal joint laxity despite the lack of a significant difference in the glenoid bone defect. However, these differences in the Hill-Sachs lesion were not related to differences in the functional outcomes between the groups.