Olerud And Molander Ankle Score Research Articles

Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.

Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of this review was to take an in-depth look at the six most cited measurement tools to assess FAI, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures related to ankle and foot. Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and SportDiscus) were searched (up to November 2022) to identify the six most cited questionnaires for assessing FAI. Our analysis showed that the most cited questionnaires are the following: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Each questionnaire was thoroughly assessed and discussed in three sections: Development, Reliability, and Summaries. In addition, bibliometric data were calculated to analyze the relevance of each questionnaire. Despite variations in terms of validity and reliability, conceptualization, structure, and usefulness, the six questionnaires proved to be robust from a psychometric point of view, being widely supported in the literature. The bibliometric analyses suggested that the FAOS ranks first and the FFI ranks sixth in the weighted average of the impact factors of their original publications.

Early versus delayed weight-bearing following operatively treated ankle fracture (WAX): a non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

After surgery for a broken ankle, patients are usually instructed to avoid walking for 6 weeks (delayed weight-bearing). Walking 2 weeks after surgery (early weight-bearing) might be a safe and preferable rehabilitation strategy. This study aimed to determine the clinical and cost effectiveness of an early weight-bearing strategy compared with a delayed weight-bearing strategy. This was a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority trial including 561 participants (aged ≥18 years) who received acute surgery for an unstable ankle fracture in 23 UK National Health Service (NHS) hospitals who were assigned to either a delayed weight-bearing (n=280) or an early weight-bearing rehabilitation strategy (n=281). Patients treated with a hindfoot nail, those who did not have protective ankle sensation (eg, peripheral neuropathy), did not have the capacity to consent, or did not have the ability to adhere to trial procedures were excluded. Neither participants nor clinicians were masked to the treatment. The primary outcome was ankle function measured using the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 4 months after randomisation, in the per-protocol population. The pre-specified non-inferiority OMAS margin was -6 points and superiority testing was included in the intention-to-treat population in the event of non-inferiority. The trial was prospectively registered with ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN12883981, and the trial is closed to new participants. Primary outcome data were collected from 480 (86%) of 561 participants. Recruitment was conducted between Jan 13, 2020, and Oct 29, 2021. At 4 months after randomisation, the mean OMAS score was 65·9 in the early weight-bearing and 61·2 in the delayed weight-bearing group and adjusted mean difference was 4·47 (95% CI 0·58 to 8·37, p=0·024; superiority testing adjusted difference 4·42, 95% CI 0·53 to 8·32, p=0·026) in favour of early weight-bearing. 46 (16%) participants in the early weight-bearing group and 39 (14%) in the delayed weight-bearing group had one or more complications (adjusted odds ratio 1·18, 95% CI 0·80 to 1·75, p=0·40). The mean costs from the perspective of the NHS and personal social services in the early and delayed weight-bearing groups were £725 and £785, respectively (mean difference -£60 [95% CI -342 to 232]). The probability that early weight-bearing is cost-effective exceeded 80%. An early weight-bearing strategy was found to be clinically non-inferior and highly likely to be cost-effective compared with the current standard of care (delayed weight-bearing). National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration Oxford and Thames Valley.

Intramedullary Nailing Versus Open Reduction and Plate Fixation for Lateral Malleolar Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

The fixation for lateral malleolar fracture in ankle fractures is still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between intramedullary nail (IMN) and plate for lateral malleolar fractures in ankle fractures. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases inception to June 2023. Data on outcomes were extracted and the methodological quality of the included studies were assessed. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software when the data extracted from included studies could be synthesized. Seven RCTs were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was moderate to high. The meta-analysis results showed that the infection rate of the IMN group was significantly lower than that of the plate group (RR = 0.38; 95%CI 0.18-0.82; p = .01). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), union rate, radiological outcomes, nerve injury rate, reoperation rate, loss of reduction, and total complication rate. Our present meta-analysis demonstrated that the IMN might be a better method for the fixation of lateral malleolar fracture in ankle fracture, as the infection rate was significantly lower than a plate.

Clinical assessments and gait analysis for patients with Trimalleolar fractures in the early postoperative period

BackgroundTrimalleolar fracture is a common ankle fracture with serious complications and costly healthcare problem. Most studies used clinical assessments to evaluate the functional status of the patients. Although clinical assessments are valid, they are static and subjective. Dynamic, objective and precise evaluations such as gait analysis are needed. Ankle biomechanics studies on gait in patients with trimalleolar fractures are still rare. This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and gait biomechanics in patients with trimalleolar fractures in the early postoperative period and compared to healthy controls.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. 12 patients with trimalleolar fractures were recruited, and 12 healthy people served as controls. All patients underwent clinical assessments: Olerud and Molander ankle score (OMAS), ankle swelling and passive range of motion (ROM) of ankle, and completed gait biomechanical analysis when weight-bearing was allowed: temporal-spatial parameters, plantar pressure distributions, and surface electromyography (sEMG). The control group only performed gait test.ResultsPatients had poor outcomes of clinical assessments in the short-term. During gait analysis, patients presented compromised gait patterns: shorter step length, larger step width, slower walking speed and shorter single support compared to healthy controls (P < 0.001), and patients showed asymmetrical gait. Symmetry index of step width and walking speed were mainly correlated with the difference of ankle inversion ROM between two sides (R = -0.750, P = 0.005; R = -0.700, P = 0.011). During walking, patients showed abnormal dynamic plantar pressure features (mainly in the hindfoot and forefoot regions), and the IEMG (integrated electromyography) of tibial anterior muscle (TA) and peroneal longus muscle (PL) were larger than healthy controls (P = 0.002, 0.050).ConclusionsPatients with trimalleolar fractures showed physical impairments of the ankle, and presented altered gait parameters compared to healthy subjects in the short-term. The ankle stability of patients declined, and deficits in TA and PL muscle ability might contribute to it. Restoring complete muscle functions and improving passive ankle ROM are significant to promote the recovery of a normal gait pattern.

A multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of external frame versus internal locking plate for complete articular pilon fracture fixation in adults.

AimsA pilon fracture is a severe ankle joint injury caused by high-energy trauma, typically affecting men of working age. Although relatively uncommon (5% to 7% of all tibial fractures), this injury causes among the worst functional and health outcomes of any skeletal injury, with a high risk of serious complications and long-term disability, and with devastating consequences on patients’ quality of life and financial prospects. Robust evidence to guide treatment is currently lacking. This study aims to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two surgical interventions that are most commonly used to treat pilon fractures.MethodsA randomized controlled trial (RCT) of 334 adult patients diagnosed with a closed type C pilon fracture will be conducted. Internal locking plate fixation will be compared with external frame fixation. The primary outcome and endpoint will be the Disability Rating Index (a patient self-reported assessment of physical disability) at 12 months. This will also be measured at baseline, three, six, and 24 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes include the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), the five-level EuroQol five-dimenison score (EQ-5D-5L), complications (including bone healing), resource use, work impact, and patient treatment preference. The acceptability of the treatments and study design to patients and health care professionals will be explored through qualitative methods.DiscussionThe two treatments being compared are the most commonly used for this injury, however there is uncertainty over which is most clinically and cost-effective. The Articular Pilon Fracture (ACTIVE) Trial is a sufficiently powered and rigorously designed study to inform clinical decisions for the treatment of adults with this injury.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(3):150–163.

Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment.

Background:The aim of this study was to assess the prospective, longitudinal outcome after arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF) and to compare the results with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in complex ankle fractures.Methods:Acute, closed, bimalleolar equivalent, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fractures were included. The AORIF cohort was enrolled prospectively. The ORIF group was identified from a retrospective database. The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The only difference was the additional arthroscopy in the AORIF cohort. The patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) following AORIF was assessed at 1 and 4 years of follow-up using the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Tegner activity scale (TAS). The AORIF cohort was propensity score matched (nearest-neighbor matching) to the ORIF database. The OMAS and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) were compared between the resulting groups. Nonparametric statistics were applied; values are presented as median (interquartile range). Twenty-six AORIF patients had a prospective 4-year follow-up.Results:No significant differences (1 year vs 4 years) were identified for the OMAS (90 [10] vs 90 [11]) and TAS (4 [2] vs 5 [2]). The severity of the cartilage lesions (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade <4 vs ICRS of 4) had no significant influence on the PROMs. Twenty-five patients per cohort (AORIF vs ORIF) were matched. The OMAS (90 [13] vs 75 [40]; P = .008) and FAAM Activities of Daily Living (ADL; 96 [11] vs 88 [30]; P = .034) revealed significantly better outcomes for AORIF. More patients in the AORIF cohort returned to sport (96% vs 77%; P = .035), with a higher FAAM Sports score (88 [37] vs 56 [47]; P = .008).Conclusion:AORIF for complex ankle fractures led to consistently good to excellent results. The propensity score–matched analysis revealed a significantly better outcome 4 years after surgery for AORIF compared with ORIF.Level of Evidence:Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Long-Term Follow-up of Functional and Radiographic Outcome After Revision Surgery for Fibula Malunion.

Background. Ankle fractures are some of the most common injuries seen in the emergency department. Malunited ankle fractures are uncommon. Patients with malunion frequently present with multiple complaints. Radiographs often show abnormalities in anatomical alignment. Aim. To evaluate the anatomical alignment on radiographic imaging in patients with malunited ankle fractures. Secondary aims were to evaluate patient satisfaction after reconstruction and to investigate the relationships between radiological alignment and functional outcome. Methods. All consecutive patients (n = 25) treated for a fibula malunion between January 1, 2002, and September 1, 2017, were included. The primary outcome was anatomical alignment of the ankle mortise. The talocrural angle (TCA), talar tilt (TT), and medial clear space (MCS) were used to investigate to what extent revision surgery had improved alignment. The patient-related outcome measure consisted of the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS). To assess quality of life (QoL) the EQ-5D-5L was used. Results. The median TCA was 78.4° before revision and 79.25° after revision; P = .297. The median TT was 2.95° before revision and 0.70° after; P < .001. The MCS before revision was 5.2 mm and 3.17 mm after; P < .000). The OMAS had a median of 67.5 points. Analysis of the QoL questionnaires yielded a score of 0.84 points. Conclusion. Anatomical alignment improves significantly after revision surgery of malunited ankles. Measurements of the TCA appeared less useful in determining the anatomical alignment. In our series, 60% of patients reported good to excellent results. The QoL scores of our patient were comparable to those in the healthy population in the Netherlands.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series

Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Complex Ankle Fractures: Intra-articular Findings and 1-Year Follow-Up

Especially after complex ankle fractures, patients regularly suffer from residual symptoms, presumably due to occult intra-articular injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-articular lesions, identify fractures specifically at risk for these, and assess the results after arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation of complex ankle fractures after 1 year. The primary outcome was the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score. Secondary outcome parameters were the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), Tegner activity scale, arthroscopic findings, functional assessment, and complications. Thirty-two patients (56% female) were enrolled. Chondral lesions were detected in 91%. Full-thickness lesions treated by microfracturing were observed in 0% of unimalleolar, 43% of bimalleolar, and 40% of trimalleolar fractures. After 1 year, the median (interquartile range) AOFAS was 94 (9) and OMAS was 90 (10) for all patients. When analyzing factors possibly influencing the outcome, age, sex, smoking, grading for surgical procedures according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists, fracture type (uni-, bi-, or trimalleolar), severity of chondral lesions graded according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (grade <4 versus grade 4), and syndesmotic instability had no significant influence on the outcome. The only variable significantly influencing the AOFAS (p = .004) and OMAS (p < .001) was body mass index (BMI; rs = –0.522 and –0.606, respectively), with a higher BMI resulting in inferior outcome scores. Complications were observed in 3 patients, 2 with superficial skin necrosis at the posterolateral incision and 1 nonunion of the medial malleolus. Taken together, these data show that intra-articular injuries were common in ankle fractures. Bi- and trimalleolar fractures were particularly at risk for full-thickness lesions. A higher BMI tended to result in inferior outcome scores. Arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation led to good to excellent results in all but 1 patient.

Treatment outcomes of distal tibia fractures among adult patients at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, Eldoret, Kenya

Background: The treatment of distal tibia fractures remains challenging since they are prone to higher rates of complications. Treatment options are expanding and although their indications, advantages and disadvantages have been discussed in literature, controversy still exists over the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of each option. This has led to different orthopaedic surgeons employing different operative treatment options based on their experience, preference and patient characteristics. Objective: This study sought to describe the patients’ characteristics and treatment of distal tibia fractures at MTRH and compare the outcome results of the various treatment options. Design: A prospective observational study design was used. Adult patients with distal tibia fractures admitted during the study period were included through consecutive sampling. Methods: A total of 76 patients were followed up. Data including injury aetiology, fracture types and classification, treatment and complications were collected. Functional outcome was assessed using Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) at 6 months after treatment. Data was collected between October 2015 and March 2017 using a structured questionnaire and analyzed using STATA version 13 at 95% confidence level. Chi square test was used to determine the significance of associations between categorical variables. Results: The median age was 40.0 (30.0, 52.0) years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7:1. Most common causes of injury were RTA in 37 patients and falls in 29 patients. There were 48 closed and 28 open injuries. According to Arbeitsgemeinschaftfur Osteosynthesefragen (AO)/ Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification, there were 40 (52.6%) type A, 28 (36.8%) type B and 8 (10.6%) type C fractures. Twenty-five (32.9%) patients were treated non-operatively, 28 (36.8%) patients underwent internal fixation with plating and 23 (30.3%) patients were treated using external fixation method. Non-operative treatment was mostly used for closed injuries (80%) whereas majority of open fractures (82%) were treated operatively ( P =0.033). Complications occurred in 48 (57.8%) patients, including 30 (62.5%) wound infections, 21 (43.7%) malunions and 3 (6%) chronic osteomyelitis. Infections were significantly higher among external fixation treated patients ( P =0.002). At final follow up the functional outcome using OMAS was excellent in 11(14.5%) patients, good in 28 (36.8%), fair in 17 (22.4%) and poor in 20 (26.3%) patients. OMAS scores were significantly high in patients treated with plating and low in patients with comminuted fractures, complications and open injuries ( P <0.001). Conclusion: Distal tibia fractures mostly occurred in young males. Road traffic accidents and falls were the commonest causes. Treatment by plate fixation resulted in significantly higher functional outcome scores and lower rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment. Recommendation: Distal tibia fractures should be treated operatively by plate fixation to improve treatment outcomes. Keywords: Distal tibia fracture, OMAS, Treatment outcome

Predicting patient-reported and objectively measured functional outcome 6 months after ankle fracture in people aged 60 years or over in the UK: prognostic model development and internal validation

ObjectiveTo predict functional outcomes 6 months after ankle fracture in people aged ≥60 years using post-treatment and 6-week follow-up data to inform anticipated recovery, and identify people who may benefit...

Early motion and directed exercise (EMADE) versus usual care post ankle fracture fixation: study protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

BackgroundFollowing surgical fixation of ankle fractures, the traditional management has included immobilisation for 6 weeks in a below-knee cast. However, this can lead to disuse atrophy of the affected leg and joint stiffness. While early rehabilitation from 2 weeks post surgery is viewed as safe, controversy remains regarding its benefits. We will compare the effectiveness of early motion and directed exercise (EMADE) ankle rehabilitation, against usual care, i.e. 6 weeks’ immobilisation in a below-knee cast.Method/designWe have designed a pragmatic randomised controlled trial (p-RCT) to compare the EMADE intervention against usual care. We will recruit 144 independently living adult participants, absent of tissue-healing comorbidities, who have undergone surgical stabilisation of isolated Weber B ankle fractures. The EMADE intervention consists of a non-weight-bearing progressive home exercise programme, complemented with manual therapy and education. Usual care consists of immobilisation in a non-weight-bearing below-knee cast. The intervention period is between week 2 and week 6 post surgery. The primary outcome is the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) at 12 weeks post surgery. Secondary PROMs include the EQ-5D-5 L questionnaire, return to work and return to driving, with objective outcomes including ankle range of motion. Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. An economic evaluation will be included.DiscussionThe EMADE intervention is a package of care designed to address the detrimental effects of disuse atrophy and joint stiffness. An advantage of the OMAS is the potential of meta-analysis with other designs. Within the economic evaluation, the cost-utility analysis, may be used by commissioners, while the use of patient-relevant outcomes, such as return to work and driving, will ensure that the study remains pertinent to patients and their families. As it is being conducted in the clinical environment, this p-RCT has high external validity. Accordingly, if significant clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness are demonstrated, EMADE should become a worthwhile treatment option. A larger-scale, multicentre trial may be required to influence national guidelines.Trial registrationISRCTN, ID: ISRCTN11212729. Registered retrospectively on 20 March 2017.

Associations of timing of surgery with postoperative length of stay, complications, and functional outcomes 3–6 years after operative fixation of closed ankle fractures

AimsTo evaluate the associations of timing of surgery with postoperative length of stay (LOS), complications, and functional outcomes 3–6 years after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in closed ankle fractures. Patients and methodsHistorical cohort study by chart review of 1011 patients for postoperative LOS and complications; 959 individuals were invited to participate in a postal survey with functional outcomes questionnaires. Complications were classified as perioperative, early, or late. The associations with time from trauma to surgery (<8h, 8h to 6days, >6days) were assessed with (1) postoperative LOS using multivariable random-effects negative binomial regression, (2) complications using multivariable binary and multinomial logistic regression, and (3) three different functional outcomes using multivariable linear regression. ResultsThe mean patient age was 51.4 (range 18–94) years, 556 (55%) were female, and 567 individuals (59%) responded to the questionnaire. There were no statistically significant associations between time to surgery and either postoperative LOS or complications after adjusting for several patient and fracture characteristics. Patients operated on >6days after the trauma had significantly worse scores on the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) (p=0.039) and somewhat worse, but non-significant, scores on the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS; p=0.573) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Score (SEFAS) scale (p=0.161) than those operated on <8h after trauma. ConclusionIn ankle-fracture surgery, there was no apparent association between timing of surgery and postoperative LOS or complications. A delay of surgery for 8h to 6days resulted in similar functional outcomes after 3–6 years suggesting there may be a safe window of time for surgery of up to 6days after trauma that can be used to plan and perform the final ORIF.

A protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial to assess the difference between functional bracing and plaster cast for the treatment of ankle fractures

BackgroundUK Hospital Episode Statistics 2013–2014 recorded 57,286 fractures of the lower limb including the ankle. This figure is expected to continue to increase due to a greater population of older adults. Following an ankle fracture, patients usually have their ankle immobilised with a plaster cast. This provides maximum support for the healing ankle but is associated with stiffness and muscle wasting. A Cochrane Review has concluded that functional bracing may reduce muscle wasting and speed recovery of ankle movement.The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full randomised controlled trial in adults with an ankle fracture followed by functional bracing and exercises versus standard plaster cast care.MethodsThis is a single-centre feasibility randomised controlled trial. All patients with a fractured ankle are potentially eligible. The trial will employ 1:1 random allocation, stratified by age and non-operative/operative management. Baseline demographic and pre-injury functional data, the Manchester-Oxford Foot and Ankle Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) will be collected alongside the EuroQol EQ-5D-5 L health-related quality of life questionnaire. A research associate will perform a clinical assessment and obtain X-rays in 6 weeks and 6 months post randomisation to record complications. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life will be collected in 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months post randomisation.DiscussionThis feasibility trial will provide authoritative high-quality evidence to inform the design of a definitive trial in this important area.Trial registration, sponsorship and fundingThis study is registered with the ISRCTN (ISRCTN17809322), assigned 5 November 2015 and approved by the NRES Committee (The Black Country, 15/WM/0340), protocol version 2.0 (17 November 2015). It is co-sponsored by the University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust and University of Warwick and funded by the NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (PB-PG-0614-34009). The trial sponsors have no direct involvement in any aspects of study design, conduct or decision to submit the report for publication.

Relationships Between Radiographic Pre- and Postoperative Alignment and Patient Perceived Outcomes Following Weber B and C Ankle Fractures

Anatomic reduction of ankle fractures may influence outcomes but the relationships between these 2 variables are still unknown and require further investigation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between radiologic alignment of surgically treated ankle fractures and functional outcomes. This retrospective study included patients who were surgically treated for Weber B and C ankle fractures. The outcome measures consisted of the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and the foot and ankle disability measure. Standard radiographs included anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views of the ankle, both on pre- and postoperatively. Between June 2011 and December 2013, a total of 152 patients were treated for ankle fractures and 76 patients with a mean age of 41.3 ± 17.1 years and a mean follow-up of 39.6 ± 8.9 months were included. There were 45 Weber type B fractures (mean age 43.4 ± 17.8, 28 females, 17 males) and 31 Weber type C fractures (mean age 40.7 ± 17.3, 12 females, 19 males). Linear regression did not reveal any significant relationships with the exception of age. There was a moderate correlation between the OMAS outcome score and age ( r2 = 0.46, P = .01). We found that younger age was a moderate predictor of functional outcome following surgical treatment of ankle fractures. Radiographic alignment using standard non-weight-bearing radiographs and fracture severity did not predict functional outcomes at 24 months postoperatively. Level III, prognostic, retrospective cohort study.

Validity and responsiveness of the ankle function score after acute ankle injury

The purpose of this study was to examine prognostic validity, concurrent validity and responsiveness of ankle function score (AFS) for patients with acute ankle injury. In a prospective cohort study, AFS was compared with Olerud and Molander ankle score (OMAS), patient-specific complaints (PSC), and global perceived effect. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to estimate prognostic validity; correlation was calculated for concurrent validity. Effect Size, Standardized Response Mean, and Responsiveness Ratio were calculated to estimate responsiveness. The sensitivity of AFS was 76% and the specificity was 57%. Correlation between AFS and OMAS at baseline, end of treatment and difference was 0.82, 0.70 and 0.79, respectively. Outcomes for responsiveness of AFS were comparable to outcomes for OMAS and PSC. This study found limited evidence for the AFS as a prognostic and evaluative instrument. The AFS is a simple instrument based on basic functional outcomes (pain, stability, weight bearing, swelling and gait) and may be used in addition to subjective clinical judgment as a prognostic and evaluative tool for recovery after acute ankle injury.

Multi-item outcome measures for lateral ligament injury of the ankle: a structured review.

To identify and review evidence relating to the measurement properties of published multi-item outcome measures for the conservative management of lateral ligament injuries of the ankle. Systematic literature searches were used to identify measures, which were then assessed against pre-defined criteria relating to development, item content, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Seven disease-specific measures of ankle status [Ankle Joint Functional Assessment Tool, Clinical Trauma Severity Score, Composite Inversion Injury Scale, Kaikkonen Functional Scale (KFS), Karlsson Ankle Function Score (KAFS), Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Point System] and two generic measures of health (McGill Pain Questionnaire, Sickness Impact Profile) met the review inclusion criteria. While all measures had been used in acute injuries, only two had also been applied during later stages of recovery (>6 months). The studies covered a comprehensive range of graded ligament injuries. Expert opinion dominated item generation for all measures. All measures lack evidence of test-retest or internal consistency reliability in patients with ankle sprain. Several measures were assessed for validity through comparison with other measures, but there was limited evidence of construct validity and no formal assessment of responsiveness for any measure. The disappointing lack of evidence for measurement properties suggests that any measure should be used with caution until appropriate evidence is provided. On the basis of limited evidence, the KFS offers the most promising approach to a combined clinician- and patient-assessment of ankle function, and the KAFS or OMAS if a patient-assessed evaluation of function is required.