Combination Of Olaparib Research Articles

SMAD4 Limits PARP1 dependent DNA Repair to Render Pancreatic Cancer Cells Sensitive to Radiotherapy.

Dysregulation of SMAD4 (i.e. somatic mutation) is strongly associated with poor pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) prognosis, yet the molecular mechanisms remain underlying this relationship obscure. Previously, we discovered that SMAD4 mutation renders pancreatic cancer resistant to radiotherapy via promotion of autophagy. In the current work, we observed a downregulation of the protein level of SMAD4 in PDAC as compared with adjacent normal tissue, and that such SMAD4low PDAC failed to benefit from chemotherapy. Furthermore, we observed that SMAD4 depletion dramatically enhanced DNA repair capacity in response to irradiation (IR) or a radiomimetic chemical. Interestingly, we found the radiomimetic chemical having induced a robust translocation of SMAD4 into the nucleus, where a direct interaction was shown to occur between the MH1 domain of SMAD4 and the DBD domain of PARP1. Functionally, the SMAD4-PARP1 interaction was found to perturb the recruitment of PARP1 to DNA damage sites. Accordingly, the combination of olaparib and radiotherapy was indicated in vivo and in vitro to specifically reduce the growth of SMAD4-deficient PDAC by attenuating PARP1 activity. Collectively, our results revealed a novel molecular mechanism for the involvement of the SMAD4-PARP1 interaction in DNA repair with a vital role in radiotherapy response in PDAC. Based on our set of findings, our findings offer a new combined therapeutic strategy for SMAD4 deficient PDAC that can significantly reduce pancreatic cancer radiotherapy resistance.

Adavosertib in Combination with Olaparib in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors: An Open-Label, Dose-Finding, and Dose-Expansion Phase Ib Trial.

Adavosertib is a first-in-class, selective small-molecule inhibitor of Wee1. Olaparib is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Preclinical data suggest that adavosertib enhances the antitumor effect of PARP inhibitors. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adavosertib plus olaparib were evaluated in patients with refractory solid tumors to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Eligible patients in part A (dose finding) had a refractory solid tumor for which there is no established treatment and had received ≥ 1 prior course of systemic therapy; in part B (dose expansion), patients had platinum-sensitive extensive-stage or relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Patients received adavosertib [once (qd) or twice daily (bid)] for 3 consecutive days with 4 days off treatment (3/4), or 5 consecutive days with 2 days off (5/2), plus olaparib (bid) for 14 or 21 days of a 21-day cycle. A total of 130 patients were enrolled in the study, 120 in part A and 10 in part B. The MTD for adavosertib bid was 175 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid; the once-daily MTD (and RP2D) was adavosertib 200 mg (days 1-3, 8-10/21-day cycle) plus continuous olaparib 200 mg bid. In the MTD/RP2D cohort, one patient (7%) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of thrombocytopenia. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined were fatigue (64.3% and 15.4%, respectively), diarrhea (42.9% and 30.8%), decreased appetite (35.7% and 23.1%), nausea (35.7% and 15.4%), and anemia (35.7% and 38.5%). In the SCLC dose-expansion cohort, TRAEs occurred in eight patients (88.9%), including thrombocytopenia (66.7%) and anemia (55.6%). In part A, objective response rate (ORR) was 14.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.7-22.9] overall; for the cohorts in which MTD/RP2D for bid dosing and RP2D for qd dosing were determined, ORR was 30.8% (9.1-61.4) and 9.1% (0.2-41.3), respectively. ORR was 11.1% [95% CI 0.3-48.2; one partial response (PR)], disease control rate was 22.2% (2.8-60.0; one PR, one stable disease), and median progression-free survival was 1.5 months (1.3-4.2) in the SCLC dose-expansion cohort. Adverse events and DLTs observed in the bid MTD and once-daily MTD/RP2D dosing schedules were manageable and consistent with known adavosertib and olaparib safety profiles. Limited antitumor activity was observed with adavosertib plus olaparib combination therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02511795 (registration: 28 July 2015).

Phase I/II Investigator-Initiated Study of Olaparib and Temozolomide in SCLC: Final Analysis and CNS Outcomes.

Temozolomide plus PARP inhibition has shown promise in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We previously reported outcomes from the first 50 patients (cohort 1) of a phase I/II trial of olaparib/temozolomide in recurrent SCLC. Here, we report a final analysis of this trial, including a second cohort with an alternate dosing strategy and an exploratory analysis of CNS-specific outcomes. This was an open-label phase I/II trial testing the combination of olaparib and temozolomide in relapsed SCLC. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints were safety, PFS, and OS. We tested escalating doses of olaparib/temozolomide across two cohorts, both of which had temozolomide dosed on D1-7 of each 21-days cycle. In previously published cohort 1, olaparib was dosed on D1-7; in cohort 2 olaparib was dosed continuously. Sixty-six patients were enrolled across the two cohorts, 50 in cohort 1 and 16 in cohort 2. The confirmed ORR of cohort 1 was 41.7% (20/48 evaluable), and the confirmed ORR of cohort 2 was 7% (1/14 evaluable; closed after dose escalation to enrollment for lack of observed efficacy). Among 15/66 patients (22.7%) with untreated brain metastases at enrollment, best overall intracranial response was CR in 6/15 patients, PR in 4/15 patients, and SD in 3/15 patients for a CNS disease control rate of 87% (95% CI: 59.5-98.3%). Olaparib/temozolomide may be effective in relapsed SCLC, especially for patients with CNS disease. Ongoing analyses regarding optimal dosing schedule will inform potential for future use of this combination in SCLC.

Celastrol attenuates the invasion and migration and augments the anticancer effects of olaparib in prostate cancer

BackgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is a leading malignancy among men globally, with rising incidence rates emphasizing the critical need for better detection and therapeutic approaches. The roles of HSP90AB1 and PARP1 in prostate cancer cells suggest potential targets for enhancing treatment efficacy.MethodsThis study investigated the overexpression of HSP90AB1 and PARP1 in prostate cancer cells and the impact of HSP90AB1 knockdown on the sensitivity of these cells to the PARP inhibitor olaparib. We also explored the combined effect of olaparib and celastrol, an HSP90 inhibitor, on the clonogenic survival, migration, proliferation, and overall viability of prostate cancer cells, alongside the modulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. An in vivo PC3 xenograft mouse model was used to assess the antitumor effects of the combined treatment.ResultsOur findings revealed significant overexpression of HSP90AB1 and PARP1 in prostate cancer cells. Knockdown of HSP90AB1 increased cell sensitivity to olaparib. The combination of olaparib and celastrol significantly reduced prostate cancer cell survival, migration, proliferation, and enhanced cumulative DNA damage. Celastrol also downregulated the PI3K/AKT pathway, increasing cell susceptibility to olaparib. In vivo experiments demonstrated that celastrol and olaparib together exerted strong antitumor effects.ConclusionsThe study indicates that targeting both HSP90AB1 and PARP1 presents a promising therapeutic strategy for prostate cancer. The synergistic combination of celastrol and olaparib enhances the efficacy of treatment against prostate cancer, offering a potent approach to combat this disease.

Enhancing therapeutic efficacy in homologous recombination-proficient pancreatic cancer via the combination of PARP1-PROTAC and a BRD4 inhibitor

Currently, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for BRCA-mutated pancreatic cancer therapy. However, limited indications hinder their further application. Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) repression can block the homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway and has the potential to enhance the response to PARPi in HR-proficient pancreatic cancer therapy. In addition, proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) can hijack E3 ligase within the cell to ubiquitinate degradation-targeted proteins effectively and quickly, thus enhancing the therapeutic effect on tumors. In the present study, the LB23 compound (with the ability to induce PARP1 degradation) was employed in combination with the BRD4 inhibitor, JQ1, and their synergistic effect in HR-proficient pancreatic cancer was confirmed via various methods. Moreover, compared with the JQ1 and PARPi olaparib combination, it was revealed that PARP1-PROTAC and JQ1 had more notable synergistic effects. Further research into the synergistic mechanism demonstrated that combination therapy enhanced DNA damage and suppressed DNA repair by inducing cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis. The present study therefore provides the experimental data for this type of combination therapy, which is expected to be an innovative approach for the treatment of HR-proficient pancreatic cancer.

Abstract C046: Targeting wild-type IDH1 sensitizes homologous recombination proficient pancreatic cancer to PARP inhibition

Abstract Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. While Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors show promise for PDAC with Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), this mutation is present in less than 10% of cases. Our research focuses on exploiting a vulnerability in the remaining 90% of HR proficient (HRP) tumors. We identified that wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) plays a critical role in HR repair. By inhibiting IDH1, we discovered suppression of the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, leading to compromised genomic integrity. This renders cancer cells more susceptible to PARP inhibitor therapy, offering a novel therapeutic approach for HRP PDAC. Methods:We assessed the impact of IDH1 inhibition on HR pathway activity using Western blotting to measure HR repair protein levels and HR reporter assays. The effect of IDH1 inhibition (Ivosidenib) combined with PARP inhibition (Olaparib) on in vitro growth inhibition was assessed through drug combination assays. Additionally, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the synergistic effects of the drug combination. To further evaluate the therapeutic potential of IDH1 inhibition in combination with PARP inhibitors, we examined tumor growth in xenograft models of PDAC in athymic nude mice and survival studies were performed in C57BL/6J mice transplanted with orthotopic murine pancreatic cancer. Results:Wild-type IDH1 blockade induces a BRCA-like phenotype by decreasing α-ketoglutarate (αKG) levels and causing histone hypermethylation. This leads to decreased HR repair efficiency in HRP pancreatic cancer cells (MiaPaCa-2 and Panc-1), resulting in a strong synergistic effect when combined with the DNA-damaging agent Olaparib. The combination treatment significantly reduced cell survival in both short and long-term assays. Furthermore, we discovered that these compounds complemented each other in the DNA damage response, leading to increased γ-H2AX (DNA damage marker) and apoptosis. In vivo studies using murine PDAC models demonstrated that the combination of ivosidenib and olaparib synergistically enhanced anti-tumor activity compared to either single agent alone. Conclusion:These data provide novel insight into the mechanisms underlying in the context of HRP cancer susceptibility to a dual treatment approach involving an IDH1 inhibitor and a PARP inhibitor. This approach holds promise for precision medicine in pancreatic cancer treatment, although further pre- clinical studies are needed for validation and refinement. Citation Format: Mehrdad Zarei, Omid Hajihassani, Hallie J. Graor, Soubhi Tahhan, Alexander W. Loftus, Faith Nakazzi, Semmer A. Ali, Parnian Naji, Luke D. Rothermel, Jonothan R. Brody, Jordan M. Winter. Targeting wild-type IDH1 sensitizes homologous recombination proficient pancreatic cancer to PARP inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr C046.

Melatonin increases Olaparib sensitivity and suppresses cancer-associated fibroblast infiltration via suppressing the LAMB3-CXCL2 axis in TNBC

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most malignant breast cancer subtype, characterized with high aggressiveness and a high recurrence rate. Olaparib is the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved poly(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi) to treat breast cancer patients with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. However, resistance to Olaparib treatment restricts the therapeutic effects, and thus novel therapeutics are urgently required. In the present study, we identified that the combination of melatonin and Olaparib synergistically enhanced the sensitivity of TNBC cells. Moreover, melatonin exerted promising antitumor activities in Olaparib-resistant cells, implying the potential for its clinical application. An RNA-sequencing analysis revealed that melatonin treatment downregulated laminin subunit beta 3 (LAMB3) expression. Genetic ablation of LAMB3 significantly increased Olaparib sensitivity, and subsequently suppressed proliferation, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related gene expressions, and aggressiveness of breast cancer cells. Accordingly, LAMB3 expression was positively correlated with C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CXCL2), and they collaboratively promoted cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) infiltration. An in vivo study demonstrated that combined treatment with melatonin and Olaparib showed enhanced inhibitory efficacy against tumor growth, LAMB3 expression, CXCL2 levels, and CAF infiltration compared to single treatment groups, and combined treatment with melatonin and Olaparib significantly ameliorated the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. These findings illustrate a promising therapeutic strategy using melatonin to overcome Olaparib resistance and activate antitumor immunity via attenuating the LAMB3-CXCL2 axis in breast cancer patients.

726P Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus olaparib combination therapy in recurrent cervical cancer progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy: Results from the phase II trial of GOTIC-025

726P Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus olaparib combination therapy in recurrent cervical cancer progressed on platinum-based chemotherapy: Results from the phase II trial of GOTIC-025

GPX4 Inhibition Enhances the Antitumor Effect of PARP Inhibitor on Homologous Recombination Proficient Ovarian Cancer Cells.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are now widely used in BRCA1/2 mutation or homologous recombination (HR) deficiency ovarian cancer but have limited efficacy in HR-proficient patients. GPX4 is a key regulator of ferroptosis and has been proven to be associated with multiple drug sensitivities. As a molecule that regulates the sensitivity of multiple drugs, the relationship between GPX4 and the efficacy of PARPi in HR-proficient ovarian cancer has not been elucidated. In this study, siRNA transfection was used to regulate the expression of GPX4. The effect of GPX4 inhibition on HR-proficient ovarian cancer was determined by CCK-8 assay and flow cytometry. Immunofluorescence and comet assays were used to reflect DNA dam-age. ROS production was measured using DCFH-DA and flow cytometry. The combination index of PARP inhibitors and RSL3 was calculated using CompuSyn software based on Chou-Talalay methodology. GPX4 inhibition confers HR-proficient ovarian cancer cells sensitive to PARPi due to ROS generation and oxidative stress caused by DNA double-strand breakage. The combina-tion of olaparib and niraparib with GPX4 inhibitor RSL3 also showed a synergistic effect. Combining GPX4 inhibition with PARP inhibitors resulted in a notable increase in DNA damage, ultimately causing the death of cancer cells with proficient HR pathways. Our findings may provide new therapeutic options for HR-proficient patients to benefit from PARP inhibitors and improve outcomes.

Olaparib monotherapy or in combination with abiraterone for treating mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: alone or stronger together?

Prostate cancer has entered the era of precision medicine with the introduction of PARP inhibitors for patients with specific mutations in genes associated with DNA damage repair. Recent studies have shown benefit in combination therapy with PARP inhibitors like olaparib and antiandrogens like abiraterone. This review discusses the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of olaparib as well as the data supporting combination therapy with olaparib and abiraterone. Co-targeting the androgen receptor and PARP pathway has shown clear clinical benefit in the management of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM. The benefit in patients without these mutations is less clear, and the benefit of olaparib combination therapy in the management of hormone sensitive disease remains to be seen.

Olaparib plus trastuzumab in HER2-positive advanced breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations: The OPHELIA phase 2 study

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of olaparib plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (ABC) and germinal BRCA mutations (gBRCAm). MethodsOPHELIA (NCT03931551) was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 clinical trial. Patients aged ≥18 years diagnosed with HER2-positive ABC with germinal deleterious mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 who had received at least one prior systemic regimen for advanced disease were enrolled. Patients received olaparib plus trastuzumab until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed clinical benefit rate for at least 24 weeks as per RECIST v.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and safety profile. ResultsA total of 68 pre-treated HER2-positive ABC patients were screened. Due to slow accrual the trial was stopped after enrolling 5 patients instead of the planned sample size of 20. Four patients achieved clinical benefit (80.0 %, 95 % CI; 28.4–99.5, p < 0.001) and the primary endpoint was met. The ORR was 60.0 % (95 % CI; 14.7–94.7), including one complete response. Four (80.0 %) patients experienced at least one treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Most TEAEs were grade 1 or 2. There were no treatment-related deaths and no new safety signals were identified. ConclusionsThis study suggests that the combination of olaparib plus trastuzumab may be effective and safe in pre-treated patients with HER2-positive gBRCAm ABC. This ABC patient population should be further studied and not be pre-emptively excluded from clinical trials of targeted therapy for BRCA1/2-driven cancers.

Onvansertib treatment overcomes olaparib resistance in high-grade ovarian carcinomas

Occurrence of resistance to olaparib, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (PARPi) approved in ovarian carcinoma, has already been shown in clinical settings. Identifying combination treatments to sensitize tumor cells and/or overcome resistance to olaparib is critical. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), a master regulator of mitosis, is also involved in the DNA damage response promoting homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA repair and in the recovery from the G2/M checkpoint. We hypothesized that PLK1 inhibition could sensitize tumor cells to PARP inhibition. Onvansertib, a highly selective PLK1 inhibitor, and olaparib were tested in vitro and in vivo in BRCA1 mutated and wild-type (wt) ovarian cancer models, including patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) resistant to olaparib. The combination of onvansertib and olaparib was additive or synergic in different ovarian cancer cell lines, causing a G2/M block of the cell cycle, DNA damage, and apoptosis, much more pronounced in cells treated with the two drugs as compared to controls and single agents treated cells. The combined treatment was well tolerated in vivo and resulted in tumor growth inhibition and a statistically increased survival in olaparib-resistant-BRCA1 mutated models. The combination was also active, although to a lesser extent, in BRCA1 wt PDXs. Pharmacodynamic analyses showed an increase in mitotic, apoptotic, and DNA damage markers in tumor samples derived from mice treated with the combination versus vehicle. We could demonstrate that in vitro onvansertib inhibited both HR and non-homologous end-joining repair pathways and in vivo induced a decrease in the number of RAD51 foci-positive tumor cells, supporting its ability to induce HR deficiency and favoring the activity of olaparib. Considering that the combination was well tolerated, these data support and foster the clinical evaluation of onvansertib with PARPis in ovarian cancer, particularly in the PARPis-resistant setting.

Auger emitter in combination with Olaparib suppresses tumor growth via promoting antitumor immune responses in pancreatic cancer.

The present study aimed to clarify the hypothesis that auger emitter 125I particles in combination with PARP inhibitor Olaparib could inhibit pancreatic cancer progression by promoting antitumor immune response. Pancreatic cancer cell line (Panc02) and mice subcutaneously inoculated with Panc02 cells were employed for the in vitro and in vivo experiments, respectively, followed by 125I and Olaparib administrations. The apoptosis and CRT exposure of Panc02 cells were detected using flow cytometry assay. QRT-PCR, immunofluorescence, immunohistochemical analysis, and western blot were employed to examine mRNA and protein expression. Experimental results showed that 125I combined with Olaparib induced immunogenic cell death and affected antigen presentation in pancreatic cancer. 125I in combination with Olaparib influenced T cells and dendritic cells by up-regulating CD4, CD8, CD69, Caspase3, CD86, granzyme B, CD80, and type I interferon (IFN)-γ and down-regulating Ki67 in vivo. The combination also activated the cyclic GMP-AMP synthase stimulator of IFN genes (Sting) pathway in Panc02 cells. Moreover, Sting knockdown alleviated the effect of the combination of 125I and Olaparib on pancreatic cancer progression. In summary, 125I in combination with Olaparib inhibited pancreatic cancer progression through promoting antitumor immune responses, which may provide a potential treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Acetylation-dependent regulation of core spliceosome modulates hepatocellular carcinoma cassette exons and sensitivity to PARP inhibitors

Despite the importance of spliceosome core components in cellular processes, their roles in cancer development, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), remain poorly understood. In this study, we uncover a critical role for SmD2, a core component of the spliceosome machinery, in modulating DNA damage in HCC through its impact on BRCA1/FANC cassette exons and expression. Our findings reveal that SmD2 depletion sensitizes HCC cells to PARP inhibitors, expanding the potential therapeutic targets. We also demonstrate that SmD2 acetylation by p300 leads to its degradation, while HDAC2-mediated deacetylation stabilizes SmD2. Importantly, we show that the combination of Romidepsin and Olaparib exhibits significant therapeutic potential in multiple HCC models, highlighting the promise of targeting SmD2 acetylation and HDAC2 inhibition alongside PARP inhibitors for HCC treatment.

HOPE: Harnessing olaparib, palbociclib, and endocrine therapy for BRCA1/2-associated HR+, HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

10616 Background: Thepoly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib yields superior progression-free survival, response rates and patient-reported outcomes compared with chemotherapy in patients with BRCA1- or BRCA2- ( BRCA1/2) associated metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Fulvestrant and palbociclib improve outcomes in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) MBC. HOPE (NCT03685331) is a phase I trial to evaluate combination olaparib (O), fulvestrant (F), and palbociclib (P) in patients with BRCA1/2-associated HR+, HER2 negative MBC. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation was used to assess safety and preliminary efficacy of O, F and P. Eligible participants (pts) had HR+ MBC, a germline (g) or somatic (s) mutation in BRCA1/2, measurable/evaluable disease, any/no prior endocrine therapy, and 0-2 prior lines of chemotherapy for MBC. Prior PARPi and CDK4/6i were permitted but not in combination. Palbociclib was added after a 28-day safety run-in (Cycle 0) of O + F alone. Fulvestrant dose was 500mg IM on day 1 of each 28-day cycle. Dose level 0 (DL0, starting level) was F, O 300mg orally BID continuously, P 75mg orally daily on days 1-21; DL-1 was F, O 250mg orally BID, P 75mg orally daily on days 1-21. The primary endpoint was MTD (adverse events (AEs) based on CTCAE v5.0). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) period included Cycles 0 and 1. A 30% DLT rate was acceptable; 6 pts had to be treated at a dose for it to be declared MTD. RECIST v1.1 was used to evaluate response. Results: Eight treated pts (s BRCA1:1 ;g BRCA2:6; s BRCA2:1 ) had median (M) age 47; M 0 (0-2) prior lines of endocrine therapy and 0 (0-1) prior chemotherapies for MBC. Three pts each had received O, F, and CDK4/6i as part of their standard of care treatment before study. At DL0, 2/2 pts had DLT with persistent grade(G) 3 neutropenia. Among 6 pts treated at DL-1, none experienced DLT, but 3 pts missed doses of study treatment due to cytopenias (G3 neutropenia, G3 leukopenia, G3 thrombocytopenia) during the DLT period. Following the DLT period, 1 pt reduced O to 200mg orally daily and 1 discontinued P based on provider discretion due to cytopenias (G3 neutropenia, G3 thrombocytopenia). Grade 3 AEs occurring in &gt;1 pt related to study treatment were: neutrophil count decrease (G3/2, n=5/2); white blood cell decrease (G3/2/1, n=3/2/2); platelet count decrease (G3/2/1, n=2/0/1). Overall related AEs in &gt;50% of pts were anemia (n=7), fatigue (n=6) and nausea (n=5). Best responses were CR/PR/SD/PD in 1/1/5/1 pts. Conclusions: MTDof O, F and P (DL-1) was reached and demonstrated antitumor activity. Although no AEs meeting protocol-specified DLT criteria were observed at MTD, hematologic toxicity at this dose complicated drug delivery and required close monitoring during and after the DLT period. Combinations utilizing PARP1 selective inhibitors, lower doses of therapy or sequential rather than combination therapy may improve feasibility. Clinical trial information: NCT03685331 .

Abstract PO4-23-08: Estrogen therapy induces receptor-dependent DNA damage enhanced by PARP inhibition in ER+ breast cancer

Abstract Although clinical evidence indicates that treatment with estrogens elicits anti-cancer effects in ~30% of patients with advanced endocrine-resistant ER+ breast cancer, the underlying mechanism of action is unclear and this treatment remains under-utilized. ER+ breast cancer cells with acquired resistance to long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) were used to model resistance to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) seen clinically. Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screening and transcriptomic profiling of LTED cells highlighted DNA Damage Response as a required pathway for therapeutic response to the estrogen 17b-estradiol. Tumor specimens from 2 patients with advanced ER+ breast cancer showed increased DNA damage response upon treatment with 17b-estradiol therapy compared to baseline. LTED cells treated with 17b-estradiol exhibited replication-dependent markers of DNA damage and the DNA damage response prior to apoptosis, while parental cells did not. Such DNA damage was partially driven by the formation of DNA:RNA hybrids (R-loops), and RNase H1-mediated prevention of R-loop formation abrogated 17b-estradiol-induced DNA damage. Pharmacological suppression of the DNA damage response via poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition with olaparib enhanced 17b-estradiol-induced DNA damage. PARP inhibition synergized with 17b-estradiol to suppress growth and prevent tumor recurrence in both BRCA1/2-mutant and BRCA1/2-wild-type cell line and patient-derived xenograft models. We therefore conclude that 17b-estradiol-induced ER activity drives DNA damage and growth inhibition in endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells, and inhibition of the DNA damage response using drugs such as PARP inhibitors can exacerbate transcriptional stress and enhance therapeutic response to 17b-estradiol. This concept is being explored clinically in the PHOEBE trial testing the combination of 17b-estradiol and olaparib (NCT05900895). These findings also warrant further study of other DNA damage response inhibitors in advanced ER+ breast cancer. Moreover, these data indicate that PARP inhibitors may have applications beyond homologous recombination-deficient tumors. Citation Format: Nicole Traphagen, Gary Schwartz, Steven Tau, Alyssa Roberts, Amanda Jiang, Sarah Hosford, Jonathan Marotti, Abigail Goen, Bianca Romo, Anneka Johnson, Emily Duffy, Eugene Demidenko, Paul Heverly, Yaron Mosesson, Shannon Soucy, Fred Kolling, Todd Miller. Estrogen therapy induces receptor-dependent DNA damage enhanced by PARP inhibition in ER+ breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-23-08.

Abstract 2036: Characterizing PARP inhibitor and next-generation anti-androgen therapy responses in advanced prostate cancer

Abstract PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been shown to be effective in prostate cancer patients with certain DNA repair defects, thus ushering in the era of precision medicine for this disease. Despite this advance, barriers remain which impede further progress including an incomplete understanding of therapeutic response. Our previous and on-going work shows that PARP inhibition leads to both cell death and a more cytostatic, senescence-like arrest. We hypothesize that persistent cells may later promote progression and treatment resistance. Recent clinical trials such as PROpel and TALAPRO-2 have demonstrated success in combining PARPi’s with next-generation anti-androgen therapies (NGAT) including abiraterone and enzalutamide. Whether NGAT’s are synthetic lethal and cell death promoting with PARP inhibition is poorly understood. Additionally, given the evolving clinical landscape for prostate cancer, it is important to test whether prior NGAT exposure may preclude response to combination therapy. In this study, we sought to characterize these combinations to better understand tumor cell response to treatment and the placement of treatment within the overall therapeutic paradigm. We’ve previously used the C4-2B metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer cell line as a model which responds well to PARP inhibition. Here, we additionally utilize the C4-2B-derived enzalutamide and abiraterone resistant lines MDVR and AbiR, respectively. The combination of olaparib with abiraterone (recently approved from results of PROpel) was significantly more efficacious than either monotherapy in all three models. Additionally, combination of talazoparib and enzalutamide (approved from results of TALAPRO-2) was also more effective than monotherapy. These data suggest that prior development of NGAT resistance does not prevent benefit from NGAT and PARPi combinations. Although both combinations were found to cause significantly less cell growth, cells appeared more cytostatic rather than apoptotic, suggesting NGAT’s do not induce significant synthetic lethality with PARPi’s. Our work suggests that combining a PARPi with an NGAT promotes a persistent cytostasis which may give rise to eventual tumor progression and the development of resistance. Future studies are directed at further characterizing combinations with PARPi’s and the development of novel strategies to enhance their efficacy. Citation Format: Love A. Moore, Bryan Correa Gonzalez, Allen C. Gao, Alan P. Lombard. Characterizing PARP inhibitor and next-generation anti-androgen therapy responses in advanced prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2036.

Abstract 7125: Inhibition of IDH1 impairs homologous recombination and induces sensitivity to PARP inhibitor in pancreatic cancer

Abstract Introduction: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. While Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors hold promise in treating PDAC with Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD). However, HRD occurs in only 10% of cases, leaving 90% with intact Homologous Recombination Proficiency (HRP). Our research highlights the key role of wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) in maintaining cellular function. We found that inhibiting IDH1 increases DNA damage, suppressing the DNA repair pathway crucial for genomic integrity. This makes cancer cells susceptible to PARP inhibitors, offering a new PDAC treatment approach. Methods: The effect of IDH1 inhibition (Ivosidenib) combined with PARP inhibition (Olaparib) on in vitro growth inhibition were assessed through Trypan blue and PicoGreen in drug combination assays. Additionally, we investigated the molecular mechanism underlying the synergistic effects of drug combination. To further evaluate the therapeutic potential of IDH1 inhibition in combination with PARP inhibitors, we examined tumor growth in xenograft models of PDAC in athymic nude mice. Results: Our data report that, mechanistically, IDH1 inhibition decreased expression of HR DNA repair pathway molecules, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, and leading to decreased HR repair efficiency in pancreatic cancer cells. Short-term cell viability data demonstrated that targeting IDH1 with ivosidenib when combined with DNA-damaging agent (Olaparib) had a synergistic effect in HRP cell lines (MiaPaCa-2 and Panc-1) with a positive synergy score and Bliss score greater than 1. Additionally, we assessed long-term cell survival using colony formation assays, which yielded a dramatic reduction in cell survival for both Panc1 and MiaPaCa-2 cells when olaparib was combined with ivosidenib, as compared to single-agent controls. Consequently, this reduction increased the levels of apoptosis induced by olaparib. Furthermore, we discovered that these two compounds complemented each other in DNA damage response, leading to an increase in the DNA damage biomarker γ-H2AX. In vivo studies using xenograft models demonstrated that the combination of ivosidenib and olaparib synergistically enhanced anti-tumor activity as compared to either single-agent used alone. Conclusion: Our data provides insights into the mechanisms underlying the susceptibility of PDAC tumor growth to a dual treatment approach involving an IDH1 inhibitor and a PARP inhibitor, particularly in the context of HRP cancer. This highlights the promise of precision medicine for pancreatic cancer treatment, though further pre-clinical studies are needed for validation and refinement. Citation Format: Mehrdad Zarei, Omid Hajihassani, Hallie J. Graor, Alexander W. Loftus, Soubhi Tahhan, Faith Nakazzi, Parnian Naji, Luke D. Rothermel, Jonothan R. Brody, Jordan M. Winter. Inhibition of IDH1 impairs homologous recombination and induces sensitivity to PARP inhibitor in pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7125.

Abstract 7147: ASN-3186 is a potent and selective inhibitor of USP1 for the treatment of BRCA1/2 mut and HRD+ cancers

Abstract Ubiquitin-specific protease 1 (USP1), a well-characterized member of the deubiquitinating enzyme family, selectively cleaves ubiquitin from various target proteins, including DNA repair protein PCNA. USP1 contributes to oncogenesis by playing critical roles in DNA damage repair processes including translesion synthesis and the Fanconi anemia pathway. Despite the clinical benefit achieved with PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in BRCA-mutated (BRCAm) or homologous recombination deficient (HRD+) populations, some patients either do not respond to therapy or develop resistance. USP1 inhibitors may have the potential to address this unmet clinical need as USP1 functions in distinct DNA damage repair pathway as compared to PARP. ASN-3186 is a novel, potent, and selective USP1 inhibitor with enzyme IC50 value of single digit nanomolar and selectivity &amp;gt;1000-fold against other family members. ASN-3186 demonstrated potent anti-proliferative activity in the BRCA1m triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line, MDA-MB-436 (IC50 &amp;lt;30 nM). MDA-MB-436 CDX mouse model confirmed dose-dependent, single-agent inhibitory activity of ASN-3186 in vivo with higher potency than KSQ4279, possibly due to ASN-3186’s higher oral bioavailability. Efficacy is consistent with increase of pharmacodynamic biomarker ub-PCNA. The combination of ASN-3186 and PARPi Olaparib yielded a more robust and durable anti-tumor response, with near-complete tumor regression demonstrated at higher combination dose. Moreover, addition of ASN-3186 significantly sensitized Olaparib’s minimal anti-tumor activity in CAOV3 (ovarian, HRD high) and MX-1 (TNBC, BCRA1/2 mut) models, which are resistant to PAPRi, indicating that it has the potential to overcome PARPi resistance. Synthetic lethal activity was also observed when ASN-3186 was combined with DNA damage drug Gemcitabine. Furthermore, ASN-3186 displayed desirable ADME and PK profiles with high oral bioavailabilities (&amp;gt;75%) across species. These data support further clinical development of ASN-3186 as a potential best-in-class USP1 inhibitor, both as a single agent as well as in combination with PARPi, for treatment of BRCA1/2 mut and HRD+ cancers. Citation Format: Qiaoling Sun, Yunfei Chen, Maojiang Wu, Jing Lv, Hongyue Jin, Peng Zeng, Xia Song, Wenfeng Hou, Qi Huang, Wei Niu, Mengyao Zhang, Tie-Lin Wang, Alice Chen. ASN-3186 is a potent and selective inhibitor of USP1 for the treatment of BRCA1/2 mut and HRD+ cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7147.

Abstract 5711: Anti-tumor effects of fadraciclib, CDK2/9 inhibitor, in biliary tract cancer

Abstract Background: Targeting CDKs has emerged as a significant strategy in the development of new drugs. The CDK4/6 inhibitors have proven their efficacy in several tumor types, while the CDK2 and CDK9 inhibitors are currently undergoing clinical trials. In biliary tract cancer (BTC), gene expressions of CDK2 and CDK9 are elevated compared to normal tissue. CDK9, a transcriptional CDK, regulates RNA polymerase II (RNAP II), leading to enhanced transcription of oncogenes, such as MCL1. Aberrant activation of these CDKs is associated with cancer progression and evading apoptosis in BTC. Notably, MCL1 is frequently amplified in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (16-21%). This finding underscores the potential significance of CDK2 and CDK9 as therapeutic targets in BTC. However, in BTC, targeting CDK2 or CDK9 has not yet been studied. In this study, we aimed to test CDK2/9 targeting and develop possible biomarker strategies in BTC. Method: A total 9 BTC cell lines (SNU245, SNU308, SNU478, SNU869, SNU1196, SNU2670, SNU2773, TFK1, and HUCCT1) were used. Fadraciclib (CDK2/9 dual inhibitor), Olaparib (PARP inhibitor), JQ1 (BRD4 inhibitor) was used. MTT assay, Colony formation assay, Annexin-V assay, and Cell cycle analysis were performed for evaluation of anti-cancer effects. The effect of Fadraciclib on homologous recombination (HR)-mediated DNA damage repair was assessed using focus formation assay and DRGFP assay. Combination of Fadraciclib with Olaparib or JQ1 was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Result: The anti-tumor effect of Fadraciclib monotherapy was relatively higher in MCL1-High BTC cells (SNU869, SNU2773) compared to MCL-Low cells (SNU245, SNU2670). In MCL1-High cells, Fadraciclib inhibited CDK9, leading to downregulation of RNAP II phosphorylation at Serine 2 and MCL1. Fadraciclib also interfered with HR-mediated DNA damage response by inhibiting transcription of HR-related genes. The combination of Fadraciclib and Olaparib exhibited synergistic anti-tumor effects in vitro in MCL1-High cells and in vivo xenograft model. Conversely, in MCL1-Low cells, Fadraciclib increased BRD4 mRNA expression, leading to the restoration of CDK9-RNAP II activity. This reactivation of RNAP II restored cellular transcription homeostasis, thereby reactivating the transcription of oncogenes such as MCL1. Combination of Fadraciclib and JQ1 showed synergistic effects in vitro in MCL1-Low cells and in vivo xenograft model by inhibiting restored CDK9-RNAP II activity. Conclusion: MCL1-High BTC cells are sensitive to CDK2/9 inhibitor and show synergism between CDK2/9 inhibitor and PARP inhibitor. In MCL1-Low BTC, a combination of a CDK2/9 inhibitor and a BRD4 inhibitor might represent an optimal strategy for new drug development. Citation Format: Jae-Min Kim, Ah-Rong Nam, Kyoung-Seok Oh, Ju-Hee Bang, Yoojin Jeong, Sea Young Choo, Su In Lee, Hyo Jung Kim, Jeesun Yoon, Tae-Yong Kim, Do-Youn Oh. Anti-tumor effects of fadraciclib, CDK2/9 inhibitor, in biliary tract cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5711.