Odor Identification Scores Research Articles

As a phenomenon: Ramadan fasting improves olfactory performance.

The present study objectived to investigate the influence of Ramadan fasting (RF) on olfactory function. Sixty-two participants were included in the current prospective study. The odor threshold and identification performances were determined by using the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Center (CCCRC) test initially (day 0) and on the first and last day (30th) of RF. Body weight (BW)s were measured initially and at the end of the study. The results were analyzed statistically. The average of baseline and last-day BWs were 78.38 ± 12.96 and 78.36 ± 12.39 kg, respectively. No significant difference was determined in terms of BWs (p = .932, p > .05). In the evaluation of CCCRC test outcomes, significant differences were observed in the scores of butanol thresholds (p = .0001), odor identification (p = .0001), food-related odors identification (p = .0001), and the number of normosmic individuals (p = .0001) at different times (p < .05). The thresholds scores (p = .0001, p = .0001), the identification scores (p = .0001, p = .0001), food-related odors identification scores (p = .0001, p = .0002), and the number of normomic individuals (p = .001, p = .001) detected on 30th day were significantly higher than on 0th and 1st days; respectively (p < .05). Additionally, the threshold scores (p = .0001), the identification scores (p = .003), food-related odors identification scores (p = .007), and the number of normosmic individuals (p = .018) detected on day 1 were significantly higher than on day 0 (p < .05). The current study demonstrated that Ramadan fasting enhances the olfactory detection threshold and odor identification scores, significantly improving the identification of food-related odors. The results may indicate that Ramadan fasting improves olfactory performance. Level II.

Odor identification dysfunction in late-life depression with suicidal ideation

BackgroundSuicide is more prevalent among older adults compared to younger individuals. Late-life depression (LLD) poses the highest risk for suicide. However, early recognition of suicidal ideation is challenging. Dysfunction in odor identification (OI), a characteristic of LLD, may hold potential for early identification of suicidal ideation. This study aims to compare OI between LLD patients with suicidal ideation (LLD-S) and LLD patients without suicidal ideation (LLD-NS), and examine its relationship with cognitive function. MethodsA total of 262 LLD-NS patients, 63 LLD-S patients, and 316 healthy normal older adults (HOAs) underwent OI testing, standardized clinical interviews, and comprehensive neuropsychological assessments. Results(1) LLD-S patients exhibited lower OI scores and poorer cognitive performance (including global cognition, information processing speed, memory, language, executive function, and visuospatial ability) compared to LLD-NS patients and HOAs. (2) There were interactive effects between suicidal ideation and OI dysfunction, leading to lower scores in information processing speed and visuospatial ability. (3) OI dysfunction mediated the differences in cognition between the LLD-NS and LLD-S groups. LimitationsThe present study was a cross-sectional design. ConclusionsLLD-S patients had worse odor identification than LLD-NS patients and HOAs, suggesting that OI testing could be a valuable approach for identifying suicidal ideation in LLD and screening for suicide risk. The presence of both OI impairment and suicidal ideation was associated with poorer cognitive performance in LLD.

Parosmia in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction in the era of COVID-19-associated olfactory impairment.

Alarge number of patients with olfactory impairment are affected by parosmia or phantosmia. This study aimed to examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of parosmia. We performed aretrospective data analysis of patients consulting at our Smell and Taste Outpatient Clinic. Atotal of 297 patients were included (203 women, mean age44.4 ± 13.7years). Olfactory function was quantified using the "Sniffin' Sticks" composite TDI (odor threshold, determination, and identification) score. The presence of qualitative olfactory impairment was assessed trough medical history and aparosmia questionnaire. Most of the patients showed olfactory impairment after an infection with SARS-CoV‑2 (84%) and were diagnosed with parosmia (49%). Patients with parosmia (PAR) (n = 201) were significantly younger compared to the group without parosmia (noPAR; n = 92) (PAR 43.2 ± 13years vs. noPAR 47 ± 15.1 years, p = 0.03) and had aslightly shorter duration of disease, without reaching statistical significance (PAR 10.3 ± 4.9months, noPAR 13.6 ± 37.6 months, p = 0.23). They also had higher TDI scores (PAR 24.3 ± 7points, noPAR 21.4 ± 8.2points, p = 0.003). Patients affected by parosmia were younger and had abetter olfactory function compared to patients without parosmia.

AROMHA Brain Health Test: A Remote Olfactory Assessment as a Screen for Cognitive Impairment.

Cost-effective, noninvasive screening methods for preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other neurocognitive disorders remain an unmet need. The olfactory neural circuits develop AD pathological changes prior to symptom onset. To probe these vulnerable circuits, we developed the digital remote AROMHA Brain Health Test (ABHT), an at-home odor identification, discrimination, memory, and intensity assessment. The ABHT was self-administered among cognitively normal (CN) English and Spanish speakers (n=127), participants with subjective cognitive complaints (SCC; n=34), and mild cognitive impairment (MCI; n=19). Self-administered tests took place remotely at home under unobserved (among interested CN participants) and observed modalities (CN, SCC, and MCI), as well as in-person with a research assistant present (CN, SCC, and MCI). Olfactory performance was similar across observed and unobserved remote self-administration and between English and Spanish speakers. Odor memory, identification, and discrimination scores decreased with age, and olfactory identification and discrimination were lower in the MCI group compared to CN and SCC groups, independent of age, sex, and education. The ABHT revealed age-related olfactory decline, and discriminated CN older adults from those with cognitive impairment. Replication of our results in other populations would support the use of the ABHT to identify and monitor individuals at risk for developing dementia.

Small effects of olfactory identification and discrimination on global cognitive and executive performance over 1 year in aging people without a history of age-related cognitive impairment

Olfactory and cognitive performance share neural correlates profoundly affected by physiological aging. However, whether odor identification and discrimination scores predict global cognitive status and executive function in healthy older people with intact cognition is unclear. Therefore, in the present study, we set out to elucidate these links in a convenience sample of 204 independently living, cognitively intact healthy Czech adults aged 77.4 ± 8.7 (61–97 years) over two waves of data collection (one-year interval). We used the Czech versions of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) to evaluate global cognition, and the Prague Stroop Test (PST), Trail Making Test (TMT), and several verbal fluency (VF) tests to assess executive function. As a subsidiary aim, we aimed to examine the contribution of olfactory performance towards achieving a MoCA score above vs. below the published cut-off value. We found that the MoCA scores exhibited moderate associations with both odor identification and discrimination. Furthermore, odor identification significantly predicted PST C and C/D scores. Odor discrimination significantly predicted PST C/D, TMT B/A, and standardized composite VF scores. Our findings demonstrate that olfaction, on the one hand, and global cognition and executive function, on the other, are related even in healthy older people.

The effect of the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele and olfactory function on odor identification networks.

The combination of apolipoprotein E ε4 (ApoE ε4) status, odor identification, and odor familiarity predicts conversion to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). To further understand olfactory disturbances and AD risk, ApoE ε4 carrier (mean age 76.38±5.21) and ε4 non-carrier (mean age 76.8±3.35) adults were given odor familiarity and identification tests and performed an odor identification task during fMRI scanning. Five task-related functional networks were detected using independent components analysis. Main and interaction effects of mean odor familiarity ratings, odor identification scores, and ε4 status on network activation and task-modulation of network functional connectivity (FC) during correct and incorrect odor identification (hits and misses), controlling for age and sex, were explored using multiple linear regression. Findings suggested that sensory-olfactory network activation was positively associated with odor identification scores in ε4 carriers with intact odor familiarity. The FC of sensory-olfactory, multisensory-semantic integration, and occipitoparietal networks was altered in ε4 carriers with poorer odor familiarity and identification. In ε4 carriers with poorer familiarity, connectivity between superior frontal areas and the sensory-olfactory network was negatively associated with odor identification scores. The results contribute to the clarification of the neurocognitive structure of odor identification processing and suggest that poorer odor familiarity and identification in ε4 carriers may signal multi-network dysfunction. Odor familiarity and identification assessment in ε4 carriers may contribute to the predictive value of risk for MCI and AD due to the breakdown of sensory-cognitive network integration. Additional research on olfactory processing in those at risk for AD is warranted.

Examining the Longitudinal Relationship Between Olfactory Dysfunction and Frailty in Community-Dwelling, older US Adults.

Olfactory dysfunction is a "canary in the coalmine" for aging conditions. We evaluated olfactory dysfunction as a biomarker of early frailty in older adults living in the United States. Prospective, longitudinal, nationally representative study. National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP). We examined data from 1061 community-dwelling older US adults. Odor identification (5-item Sniffin' Stick) and frailty scores were measured at baseline and 5-year follow-up. Multivariate logistic regressions evaluated the association between olfactory dysfunction and frailty at baseline in cross-section and over time in the transition from robust to prefrail to frail, adjusting for confounding factors measured at baseline. Older US adults who were anosmic at baseline were more likely to be frail 5 years later compared to normosmic peers (odds ratio [OR]: 3.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-13.31, P = .035). Examining changes in frailty stage over time, we found that anosmics were more likely to transition from prefrail to frail over 5 years (OR: 3.25, 95% CI: 1.31-8.08, P = .011). Interestingly, hyposmics did not show a similar trajectory toward frailty (P > .05). In contrast, olfactory dysfunction was not associated with frailty in cross-section (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.43-1.89, P = .787, hyposmia; OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.15-3.35, P = .673, anosmia). Older US adults with anosmia face higher odds of becoming frail over 5 years, especially those in the prefrail stage. Olfactory dysfunction may serve as a surrogate marker for early-stage neurodegenerative diseases, which are strong contributors to frailty.

Odor identification score as an alternative method for early identification of amyloidogenesis in Alzheimer’s disease

A simple screening test to identify the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is urgently needed. We investigated whether odor identification impairment can be used to differentiate between stages of the A/T/N classification (amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration) in individuals with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or AD and in healthy controls. We collected data from 132 Japanese participants visiting the Toranomon Hospital dementia outpatient clinic. The odor identification scores correlated significantly with major neuropsychological scores, regardless of apolipoprotein E4 status, and with effective cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers [amyloid β 42 (Aβ42) and the Aβ42/40 and phosphorylated Tau (p-Tau)/Aβ42 ratios] but not with ineffective biomarkers [Aβ40 and the p-Tau/total Tau ratio]. A weak positive correlation was observed between the corrected odor identification score (adjusted for age, sex, ApoE4 and MMSE), CSF Aβ42, and the Aβ42/40 ratio. The odor identification score demonstrated excellent discriminative power for the amyloidogenesis stage , according to the A/T/N classification, but was unsuitable for differentiating between the p-Tau accumulation and the neurodegeneration stages. After twelve odor species were analyzed, a version of the score comprising only four odors—India ink, wood, curry, and sweaty socks—proved highly effective in identifying AD amyloidogenesis, showing promise for the screening of preclinical AD.

Factors influencing olfactory function in an adult general population sample: the CHRIS study.

The sense of smell allows for the assessment of the chemical composition of volatiles in our environment. Different factors are associated with reduced olfactory function, including age, sex, as well as health and lifestyle conditions. However, most studies that aimed at identifying the variables that drive olfactory function in the population suffered from methodological weaknesses in study designs and participant selection, such as the inclusion of convenience sample or only of certain age groups, or recruitment biases. We aimed to overcome these issues by investigating the Cooperative Health Research in South Tyrol (CHRIS) cohort, a population-based cohort, by using a validated odor identification test. Specifically, we hypothesized that a series of medical, demographic and lifestyle variables is associated with odor identification abilities. In addition, our goal was to provide clinicians and researchers with normative values for the Sniffin' Sticks identification set, after exclusion of individuals with impaired nasal patency. We included 6,944 participants without acute nasal obstruction and assessed several biological, social, and medical parameters. A basic model determined that age, sex, years of education, and smoking status together explained roughly 13% of the total variance in the data. We further observed that variables related to medical (positive screening for cognitive impairment and for Parkinson's disease, history of skull fracture, stage 2 hypertension) and lifestyle (alcohol abstinence) conditions had a negative effect on odor identification scores. Finally, we provide clinicians with normative values for both versions of the Sniffin' Sticks odor identification test, i.e. with 16 items and with 12 items.

Threshold and suprathreshold component analysis in olfactory dysfunction: a retrospective study.

To analyse variations in the n-butanol threshold and odour identification scores of the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Centre test in various grades of olfactory dysfunction and in different nasal conditions leading to olfactory loss. Retrospective observational study. All grades of olfactory dysfunction were predominantly noted among males. In chronic rhinosinusitis, anosmia or severe hyposmia was seen in 87.5 per cent of patients without polyps in comparison with 68 per cent of patients with polyps. In addition, 90 per cent of patients with atrophic rhinitis and post-traumatic loss had anosmia, but only 30.7 per cent of patients with allergic rhinitis had anosmia. Pepper was the most affected smell for all the nasal diseases except atrophic rhinitis, in which asafoetida and baby powder smells were affected more. In most inflammatory sinonasal conditions, odour identification is relatively preserved even when the threshold is maximally affected. In patients with comparable olfactory dysfunction based on the Connecticut Chemosensory Clinical Research Centre test score, a relatively preserved suprathreshold odour identification score may predict better prognosis.

Normative Data for the 12-Item Sniffin' Sticks Odor Identification Test in Older Adults.

Quantitative olfactory assessment has demonstrated clinical utility for the evaluation of a range of neurologic, psychiatric, and sinonasal conditions. Here, we provide age, sex, race, and education-specific normative data for the 12-item Sniffin Sticks Odor Identification Test (SSOIT-12) in older Black and White U.S. adults without preclinical or clinical dementia or sinonasal disease. A sample of 2,224 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants aged 66-89years were included. A normative regression equation was developed using a linear model for the association of age, sex, race, and education with odor identification score. Regression-based normative mean scores and percentiles were generated by age, sex, race, and education groups. Participants (mean age = 74years, 59% women, 20% Black, 48% > high school education) had a mean SSOIT-12 score of 9.8. Age, sex, race, and education were all associated with odor identification performance (all ps < .05). A linear regression model for the predicted SSOIT-12 score was developed for use with an individual's actual SSOIT-12 score in order to calculate the Z-score and corresponding percentile for a specific age, sex, race, and education group. Data are also reported in tabular format. Our study provides SSOIT-12 normative data obtained from a large population of White and Black older adults without preclinical or clinical dementia or sinonasal disease living in the USA. These findings can aid clinicians in assessing the degree of olfactory loss, establishing concordance with a person's perception of olfactory difficulties and quantitatively monitoring changes in olfactory performance over time.

Olfactory function assessment of migraine patients by using the Sniffin’ sticks test: A clinical study

ObjectiveThis as a cross-sectional controlled clinical study. We hypothesis that the olfactory functions in migraine patients may differ from the healthy controls. In this study, we evaluated the olfactory functions by using a Sniffin’ Sticks test battery, which is a reliable and semi quantitative test to evaluate for olfactory dysfunction. MethodsPatients above 18 years of age who had migraine received a definitive diagnosis of migraine from experienced headache specialists based on the criteria of The International Classification of Headache Disorders-3 were included. Odor threshold, discrimination, and identification parameters were assessed using the “Sniffin’ Sticks” test. ResultsOne-hundred and one migraine patients (age [mean ± SD], 36.9 ± 10.4 years; range, 18–60 years) and sixty healthy volunteers (age 34.5 ± 13.2 years, range 18–65 years) participated in our study.The median odor threshold score [percentiles 25th–75th] was 8.3 [6.5–9.8] for the migraine group during attack free period and 4.5[3.6–6.0] for the control group. It was found that the migraine group had a median odor discrimination score of 10.0 [10.0–13.0] and the control group 12.0 [11.0–13.0]. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.032 respectively).The median odor discrimination and identification scores were statistically significant higher for the participants with higher educational level group than in those of lower educational group (p < 0.0001). The median odor discrimination and identification scores of those without allodynia (12.0 [10.0–14.0] and 13.0 [10.0–13.0] respectively) were higher than that of those with allodynia (11.0 [9.0–12.0] and 11.0 [10.0–13.0] respectively) (p = 0.037 and p = 0.034 respectively). ConclusionsWe found that the odor thresholds, discrimination and identification scores of the migraine group demonstrate differences from those of the healthy group and in relation to allodynia.

Association of Olfaction and Microstructural Integrity of Brain Tissue in Community-Dwelling Adults: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study.

Research on olfaction and brain neuropathology may help understand brain regions associated with normal olfaction and dementia pathophysiology. To identify early regional brain structures affected in poor olfaction, we examined cross-sectional associations of microstructural integrity of the brain with olfaction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study. Participants were selected from a prospective cohort study of community-dwelling adults; selection criteria included the following: evidence of cognitive impairment, participation in a previous MRI study, and a random sample of cognitively normal participants. Microstructural integrity was measured by 2 diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) measures, fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD), and olfaction by a 12-item odor identification test at the same visit. Higher FA and MD values indicate better and worse microstructural integrity, respectively, and higher odor identification scores indicate better olfaction. We used brain region-specific linear regression models to examine associations between DTI measures and olfaction, adjusting for potential confounders. Among 1,418 participants (mean age 76 ± 5 years, 41% male, 21% Black race, 59% with normal cognition), the mean olfaction score was 9 ± 2.3. Relevant to olfaction, higher MD in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) regions, namely the hippocampus (β -0.79 [95% CI -0.94 to -0.65] units lower olfaction score per 1 SD higher MD), amygdala, entorhinal area, and some white matter (WM) tracts connecting to these regions, was associated with olfaction. We also observed associations with MD and WM FA in multiple atlas regions that were not previously implicated in olfaction. The associations between MD and olfaction were particularly stronger in the MTL regions among individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) compared with those with normal cognition (e.g., βhippocampus -0.75 [95% CI -1.02 to -0.49] and -0.44 [95% CI -0.63 to -0.26] for MCI and normal cognition, respectively, p interaction = 0.004). Neuronal microstructural integrity in multiple brain regions, particularly the MTL (the regions known to be affected in early Alzheimer disease), is associated with odor identification ability. Differential associations in the MTL regions among cognitively normal individuals compared with those with MCI may reflect the earlier vs later effects of the dementia pathogenesis. It is likely that some of the associated regions may not have any functional relevance to olfaction.

Olfactory status in neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation disorders.

Olfactory dysfunction has been suggested as a diagnostic and discriminative biomarker in some neurodegenerative disorders. However, there are few studies regarding the olfactory status in rare diseases including neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation (NBIA) disorders. Genetically-confirmed NBIA patients were enrolled. Neurological and cognitive examinations were conducted according to the Pantothenate Kinase-Associated Neurodegeneration-Disease Rating Scale (PKAN-DRS) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire, respectively. Olfaction was assessed in three domains of odor threshold (OT), odor discrimination (OD), odor identification (OI), and total sum (TDI) score by the Sniffin' Sticks test. The olfactory scores were compared to a control group and a normative data set. Thirty-seven patients, including 22 PKAN, 6 Kufor Rakeb syndrome, 4 Mitochondrial membrane Protein-Associated Neurodegeneration (MPAN), 5 cases of other 4 subtypes, and 37 controls were enrolled. The mean PKAN-DRS score was 51.83±24.93. Sixteen patients (55.2%) had normal cognition based on MMSE. NBIA patients had significantly lower olfactory scores compared to the controls in TDI and all three subtests, and 60% of them were hyposmic according to the normative data. Including only the cognitively-normal patients, still, OI and TDI scores were significantly lower compared to the controls. The phospholipase A2-Associated Neurodegeneration (PLAN) and MPAN patients had a significantly lower OI score compared to the cognitively-matched PKAN patients. Olfactory impairment as a common finding in various subtypes of NBIA disorder can potentially be considered a discriminative biomarker. Better OI in PKAN compared to PLAN and MPAN patients may be related to the different underlying pathologies.

Treatment of COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction with olfactory training, palmitoylethanolamide with luteolin, or combined therapy: a blinded controlled multicenter randomized trial

PurposeFew evidence-based therapies are available for chronic olfactory dysfunction after COVID-19. This study investigated the relative efficacy of olfactory training alone, co-ultramicronized palmitoylethanolamide with luteolin (um-PEA–LUT, an anti-neuroinflammatory supplement) alone, or combined therapy for treating chronic olfactory dysfunction from COVID-19.MethodsThis double-blinded controlled, placebo-controlled multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 202 patients with persistent COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction of > 6 month duration. After a screening nasal endoscopy, patients were randomized to: (1) olfactory training and placebo; (2) once daily um-PEA–LUT alone; (3) twice daily um-PEA–LUT alone; or (4) combination of once daily um-PEA–LUT with olfactory training. Olfactory testing (Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test) was performed at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 months. The primary outcome was recovery of over three points on olfactory testing, with outcomes compared at T0, T1, T2 and T3 across groups. Statistical analyses included one-way ANOVA for numeric data and chi-square for nominal data.ResultsAll patients completed the study, and there were no adverse events. At 90 days, odor identification scores improved by > 3 points in 89.2% of patients receiving combined therapy vs. 36.8% receiving olfactory training with placebo, 40% receiving twice daily um-PEA–LUT alone, and 41.6% receiving once daily um-PEA–LUT alone (p < 0.00001). Patients receiving treatment with um-PEA–LUT alone demonstrated subclinical improvement (< 3 point odor identification improvement) more often than patients receiving olfactory training with placebo (p < 0.0001.)ConclusionsOlfactory training plus once daily um-PEA–LUT resulted in greater olfactory recovery than either therapy alone in patients with long-term olfactory function due to COVID-19.Trial registration20112020PGFN on clinicaltrials.gov.Level of evidence1b (Individual Randomized Clinical Trial).

Olfactory and gustatory outcomes following endoscopic transsphenoidal hypophysectomy

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate olfactory, gustatory, and quality-of-life outcomes in patients who underwent endonasal transsphenoidal hypophysectomy.MethodsIn this prospective study, the patients were assessed subjectively using the Malay version of sQOD-NS (short questionnaire of olfactory disorders in a negative statement) and objectively using the culturally adapted Sniffin’ Sticks smell test and taste test preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The Sniffin’ Sticks smell test consists of odor identification, odor discrimination, and odor threshold tests. The taste test consists of different sweet, salt, sour, and bitter concentrations.ResultsTwenty patients were enrolled in the study. The study comprises 45% female and 55% male. On average patients’ ages were 49.5 years. In this study we found a significantly reduced in odor identification score (p = 0.049) post-surgery; however, there was no statistically significant difference in odor threshold, odor discrimination, and taste. The olfactory quality of life outcome based on the Malay version of sQOD-NS (p = 0.001) was significantly reduced after surgery. There was no significant difference in the Sniffin’ Sticks smell test (p < 0.178) and taste test (p < 0.425) pre-surgery and post-surgery. The tumor’s location, either sellar or suprasellar, did not influence the smell outcome of patients postoperatively (p = 0.056).ConclusionThe study showed that the endoscopic transsphenoidal technique for pituitary surgery does not pose permanent olfactory disability.

Properties of odor identification testing in screening for early-stage Alzheimer’s disease

Odor identification (OI) is impaired in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, data regarding the diagnostic properties of OI tests are lacking, preventing their clinical use. We aimed to explore OI and determine the accuracy of OI testing in screening for patients with early AD. In total, 30 participants with mild cognitive impairment due to AD (MCI-AD), 30 with mild dementia due to AD (MD-AD), and 30 cognitively normal elderly participants (CN) were enrolled, and cognitive examination (CDR, MMSE, ADAS-Cog 13, and verbal fluency tests) and assessment of OI (Burghart Sniffin’ Sticks odor identification test) were performed. MCI-AD patients scored significantly worse in OI than CN participants, and MD-AD patients had worse OI scores than MCI-AD patients. The ratio of OI to ADAS-Cog 13 score had good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating AD patients from CN participants and in differentiating MCI-AD patients from CN participants. Substitution of ADAS-Cog 13 score with the ratio of OI to ADAS-Cog 13 score in a multinomial regression model improved the classification accuracy, especially of MCI-AD cases. Our results confirmed that OI is impaired during the prodromal stage of AD. OI testing has a good diagnostic quality and can improve the accuracy of screening for early-stage AD.

Deficits in odor discrimination versus odor identification in patients with schizophrenia and negative correlations with GABAergic and DNA methyltransferase mRNAs in lymphocytes.

People with schizophrenia have been reported to show deficits in tests of olfactory function. DNA methylation and GABAergic input have been implicated in biochemical processes controlling odor in animal studies, but this has not been investigated in human studies. In a study of measures of DNA methylation and GABAergic mRNAs in lymphocytes, we also measured odor identification and discrimination with the Sniffin' Sticks battery in 58 patients with chronic schizophrenia (CSZ) and 48 controls. mRNAs in lymphocytes were assessed by qPCR using TaqManTM probes. Cognition was assessed by the MATRICS battery (Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia) in CSZ and controls, and symptoms in CSZ were assessed by PANSS scale (Positive and Negative Symptom Scale). The relationships of odor deficits with mRNA, cognition, and symptoms were explored by correlation analysis. Variables which significantly differentiated CSZ from controls were explored by logistic regression. Overall, CSZ showed significantly (P≤.001) lower scores on odor discrimination compared to controls, with a moderate effect size, but no difference in odor identification. Deficits in odor discrimination, which has not been standardly assessed in many prior studies, strongly differentiated CSZ from controls. In logistic regression analysis, odor discrimination, but not odor identification, was a significant variable predicting schizophrenia versus control class membership. This is the first study to report relationship between odor deficits and DNA methylation and GABAergic mRNAs in blood cells of human subjects. There were negative correlations of odor identification with DNA methylation enzymes mRNAs and significant negative correlations with odor discrimination and GABAergic mRNAs. Lower odor scores were significantly associated with lower cognitive scores on the MATRICS battery in CSZ but not control subjects. In CSZ, lower odor scores were significantly associated with negative symptom scores, while higher odor identification scores were associated with PANNS Excitement factor. Odor discrimination was a more powerful variable than odor identification in discriminating CSZ from controls and should be used more regularly as an odor measure in studies of schizophrenia. The substantive meaning of the negative correlations of odor discrimination and GABAergic mRNA variables in peripheral lymphocytes of CSZ needs more investigation and comparison with results in neural tissue.

Odor deprivation influences human olfactory function

Odor deprivation leads to anatomical and neurochemical changes in the olfactory system, but its effect on human olfaction has not been systematically explored. The present randomized, controlled study aimed to investigate whether odor deprivation by different methods can affect olfactory function in humans. In the present study, sixty-one healthy participants were randomly assigned into three groups: a nasal device group (wearing an intranasal silicone air diversion system for 6–8 h daily), a mask group (wearing a filtering face piece for 6–8 h daily) and a control group (no special instructions in terms of wearing masks). Before and immediately after a 14-day study phase, all participants underwent assessments of olfactory function, nasal patency and well-being. Following the 2-week observation period, the nasal device group exhibited significantly reduced TDI scores (with especially pronounced reductions for odor threshold scores), and the mask group exhibited a minor increase in odor identification scores compared with the control group. The change in well-being scores was positively associated with changes in odor identification and TDI scores. Olfactory deprivation using an intranasal silicone air diversion device is associated with olfactory impairment (especially for odor thresholds). Highlighting the exposure-driven plasticity of the olfactory system, it may serve as a possible model of hyposmia in future studies. In addition, it may also prove useful in patients with parosmia, possibly reducing the burden of unpleasant odorous sensations.

Olfactory Impairment Correlates with Executive Functions Disorders and Other Specific Cognitive Dysfunctions in Parkinson's Disease.

Olfactory and cognitive disorders represent important non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). No clear evidence was reported about association of specific cognitive domains and olfactory impairment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between olfactory dysfunction and specific cognitive domains in PD patients compared to controls. 178 PD patients and 98 controls were enrolled and evaluated for odor threshold (OT), discrimination (OD), identification (OI), and TDI score using the Sniffin' Sticks test. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale with six sub-scores: Orientation (OIS), Attention (AIS), Language (LIS), Visuospatial (VIS), Memory (MIS), and Executive index scores (EIS). Statistically significant correlations were observed between OT versus, LIS, and between TDI score versus EIS. Multivariate linear regression analysis, including age and sex which are well-known predictors of olfactory dysfunction, showed that, among specific cognitive domains, only LIS was significant predictor for OT, VIS was a significant predictor for OD, while both EIS and AIS were significant predictors for OI, and finally only EIS was significant predictor for TDI score. Olfactory disorders in PD patients appear commonly related to dysfunction of specific cognitive domains, with strict association between global olfactory impairment and executive function deficits.