Odds Of Excellent Outcome Research Articles

Comparison of Mobile Stroke Unit With Usual Care for Acute Ischemic Stroke Management

So far, uncertainty remains as to whether there is sufficient cumulative evidence that mobile stroke unit (MSU; specialized ambulance equipped with computed tomography scanner, point-of-care laboratory, and neurological expertise) use leads to better functional outcomes compared with usual care. To determine with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature whether MSU use is associated with better functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase from 1960 to 2021. Studies comparing MSU deployment and usual care for patients with suspected stroke were eligible for analysis, excluding case series and case-control studies. Independent data extraction by 2 observers, following the PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. The risk of bias in each study was determined using the ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools. In the case of articles with partially overlapping study populations, unpublished disentangled results were obtained. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. The primary outcome was excellent outcome as measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; score of 0 to 1 at 90 days). Compared with usual care, MSU use was associated with excellent outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.27-2.13; P < .001; 5 studies; n = 3228), reduced disability over the full range of the mRS (adjusted common OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14-1.70; P = .001; 3 studies; n = 1563), good outcome (mRS score of 0 to 2: crude OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44; P = .001; 6 studies; n = 3266), shorter onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) times (median reduction, 31 minutes [95% CI, 23-39]; P < .001; 13 studies; n = 3322), delivery of IVT (crude OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.58-2.12; P < .001; 7 studies; n = 4790), and IVT within 60 minutes of symptom onset (crude OR, 7.71; 95% CI, 4.17-14.25; P < .001; 8 studies; n = 3351). MSU use was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 7 days or at 90 days or with higher proportions of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after IVT. Compared with usual care, MSU use was associated with an approximately 65% increase in the odds of excellent outcome and a 30-minute reduction in onset-to-IVT times, without safety concerns. These results should help guideline writing committees and policy makers.

Abstract P535: Quality of Reperfusion and Clinical Outcome in ESCAPE-NA1 Trial

Background: We evaluated clinical outcome in relation to the degree of reperfusion in ESCAPE-NA1 trial. Methods: ESCAPE-NA1 was a multicenter, international randomized trial assessing the efficacy of nerinetide in ischemic stroke patients who underwent EVT within 12h from onset. Independent clinical outcome [90-days modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2], excellent clinical outcome (90-days mRS 0-1), isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage with no parenchymal hemorrhage (iSAH) or symptomatic hemorrhage (sICH) on follow-up imaging, and death were compared between a treatment group and control group with respect to the level of reperfusion defined as mTICI. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Data from 1090 patients were assessed. The occlusion locations were terminal ICA (18.3%), M1 MCA (61.8%,) M2 MCA (15.1%), other - e.g. M3 (3.7%). Final mTICI 0-1 was achieved in 5.5% of patients, mTICI 2a in 7.5%, mTICI 2b in 40.8%, mTICI 2c in 26.6% and mTICI 3 in 19.5%. Isolated SAH was present in 1.7% and sICH in 3%. There was no significant difference between the nerinetide and control groups in the reperfusion grade, presence of iSAH or sICH, or in clinical outcome. Odds of independent outcomes (mRS 0-2) and odds of excellent outcome (mRS 0-1) were significantly increasing with each improved reperfusion grade, Table 1. Sixty percent of patients with final mTICI 2b, 70% with mTICI 2c and 69% with mTICI 3 achieved good clinical outcome in comparison to 30% of patients with mTICI 0-2a. The incidence of iSAH was significantly lower in the NA1 arm (OR 0.28, 95%CI: 0.09-0.86, p=.027) adjusting for reperfusion status. Conclusion: Degrees of better reperfusion are strongly associated with better outcomes and reduced mortality. mTICI 2c-3 reperfusion should be a standard goal of EVT.

Abstract P73: Imaging Markers of Brain Frailty and Outcome in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and purpose: Functional outcome after stroke may be related to preexisting brain health. Several imaging markers of brain frailty have been described including brain atrophy and markers of small vessel disease. We investigated the association of these imaging markers with functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients with acute ischemic stroke enrolled in the AXIS-2 trial, an international, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor versus placebo. We assessed the ratio of brain parenchymal volume to total intracerebral volumes (i.e., the brain parenchymal fraction [BPF]) and total brain volumes from routine baseline MRI data obtained within 9 hours of symptom onset using the unified segmentation algorithm in SPM12. Enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS), white matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunes as well as a small vessel disease (SVD) burden were rated visually. Functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score) at day 90 were determined. Logistic regression was used to test associations between brain imaging features and functional outcomes. As there was no significant effect of G-CSF on any outcomes in AXIS-2, placebo and active groups were combined for these analyses. Results: We enrolled 259 patients with a mean age of 69±12 years and 46 % were female. Increased BPF was associated with higher odds of excellent outcome (OR per percent increase: 1.081, 95%CI: 1.012-1.155). Total brain volumes and SVD burden were not associated with functional outcome. An interaction between BPF and large vessel occlusion on excellent outcome was not observed. Conclusions: Global brain health, as assessed by brain parenchymal fraction on magnetic resonance imaging, is associated with excellent functional outcome after ischemic stroke. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00927836.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous rtPA in Ischemic Strokes Due to Small-Vessel Occlusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rtPA) has been routinely used to treat ischemic stroke for 25 years, following large clinical trials. However, there are few prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of this therapy in strokes attributed to cerebral small vessel disease (SVD). We evaluated functional outcome (modified Rankin scale, mRS) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) using all available data on the effects of iv-rtPA in SVD-related ischemic stroke (defined either using neuroimaging, clinical features, or both). Using fixed-effect and random-effects models, we calculated the pooled effect estimates with regard to excellent and favorable outcomes (mRS=0–1 and 0–2 respectively, at 3 months), and the rate of sICH. Twenty-three studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria, 11 of which were comparative, and there were only 3 randomized clinical trials. In adjusted analyses, there was an increased odds of excellent outcome (adjusted OR=1.53, 95% CI: 1.29–1.82, I2: 0%) or favorable outcome (adjusted OR=1.68, 95% CI: 1.31–2.15,I2: 0%) in patients who received iv-rtPA compared with placebo. Across the six studies which reported it, the incidence of sICH was higher in the treatment group (M-H RR = 8.83, 95% CI: 2.76–28.27). The pooled rate of sICH in patients with SVD administered iv-rtPA was only 0.72% (95% CI: 0.12%–1.64%). We conclude that when ischemic stroke attributed to SVD is considered separately, available data on the effects of iv-rtPA therapy are insufficient for the highest level of recommendation, but it seems to be safe. Although further therapeutic trials in SVD-related ischemic stroke appear to be justified, our findings should not prevent its continued use for this group of patients in clinical practice.

Safety and outcome of thrombolysis in mild stroke: a meta-analysis.

BackgroundWhether patients presenting with mild stroke should or should not be treated with intravenous rtPA is still controversial. This systematic review aims to assess the safety and outcome of thrombolysis in these patients.Material/MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies evaluating intravenous rtPA in patients with mild or rapidly improving symptoms except case reports. Excellent outcome (author reported, mainly mRS 0-1), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality were analyzed.ResultsFourteen studies were included (n=1906 patients). Of these, 4 studies were comparative (2 randomized and 2 non-randomized). The remaining were single-arm studies. On the basis of 4 comparative studies with a total of 1006 patients, the meta-analysis did not identify a significant difference in the odds of excellent outcome (OR=0.86; 95% CI: 0.64–1.15; I2=0) between IV rtPA-treated minor stroke and those without rtPA treatment. Eleven studies involving 1083 patients showed the pooled rate of excellent outcome was 76.1% (95% CI: 69.8–81.5%, I2=42.5). Seven studies involving 378 patients showed the mortality rate was 4.5% (95% CI: 2.6–7.5%, I2=1.4). Twelve studies involving 831 patients showed the pooled rate of sICH was 2.4% (95% CI: 1.5–3.8, I2=0).ConclusionsAlthough efficacy is not clearly established, this study reveals the adverse event rates related to thrombolysis are low in mild stroke. Intravenous rtPA should be considered in these patients until more RCT evidence is available.