TOPIC: Critical Care TYPE: Original Investigations PURPOSE: Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy has been increasingly recognized; however, the prevalence and impact of sepsis in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) patients need further exploration. We aimed to assess the burden and outcomes of PPCM-related hospitalization with vs. without sepsis in this population-based study in the United States. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (2015October-2017) to access PPCM with vs. without sepsis using relevant ICD-10 codes. We compared baseline demographics and comorbidities between the groups (sepsis+ vs. sepsis-). The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest including ventricular tachyarrhythmias, cardiogenic shock, respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation/respiratory intubation, and secondary outcomes included patient disposition, length of stay, and hospital charges. A two-tailed p-value<0.05 was considered for statistical significance. RESULTS: Of the 10,275 PPCM admissions, 460 were related to sepsis (0.04%). The PPCM-sepsis+ cohort often consisted of younger (30 [24-36]), white (47.1% vs 39%, p<0.001) patients admitted non-electively (90.2% vs 87.7%, p=0.109) compared to the PPCM-sepsis- cohort. The PPCM-sepsis+ cohort more frequently comprised of Medicaid enrollees (52.2% vs 51.9%, p<0.001), patients in middle income quartile (27.2% vs 26.0%, p=0.007), admissions to large bedsized hospitals (64.1% vs 62%, p=0.588) compared to PPCM-sepsis - cohort. The PPCM-sepsis+ cohort was often associated with congestive heart failure (55.4% vs 48.2%, p=0.003), coagulopathy (10.9% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), chronic kidney disease (15.2% vs 5.9%, p<0.001), anemias (27.2% vs 20.8%, p<0.001), pulmonary circulation disorder (3.3% vs 1.7%, p=0.012), and psychoses (4.3% vs 1.9%, p<0.001) compared to PPCM-sepsis- cohort. PPCM-sepsis+ cohort showed lower frequency of hypertension (40.2% vs 59.9%, p<0.001), obesity (16.3% vs 26.3%, p<0.001), chronic pulmonary disease (8.7% vs 14.9%, p<0.001) and valvular heart disease (7.6% vs 13.0%, p<0.001) compared to sepsis- cohort. The PPCM-sepsis+ cohort had significantly higher frequency and odds of all-cause mortality (7.6% vs 1.2%, aOR 7.59, 95% CI 4.35-13.23; p<0.001) along with higher rates of cardiac arrest (5.4% vs 3.0%, p0.003), cardiogenic shock (8.7% vs 5.2%, p<0.001), respiratory failure (56.5% vs 19.8%, p<0.001), mechanical ventilation/respiratory intubation (28.3% vs 10.9%, p<0.001) compared to the PPCM-sepsis- cohort. The PPCM-sepsis+ cohort were less often discharged routinely (63.0% vs. 81.5%, p<0.001), experienced prolonged hospital stay (5 vs 3 days) and higher hospital charges (60,752$ vs 30,554$) as compared to PPCM-sepsis- cohort (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of sepsis in PPCM-related admissions remains low. However, concomitant sepsis predicted nearly seven times higher all-cause mortality and alarmingly higher rates of cardiopulmonary complications in PPCM. Preventive screening measures and timely management of sepsis in PPCM could prevent worse outcomes. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Sepsis in PPCM patients leads to significantly higher mortality and morbidity which needs to be further assessed with larger prospective studies. Enforcement of screening protocols in PPCM could help curtail worse outcomes and healthcare expenditure. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Charu Agarwal, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Rupak Desai, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Zainab Gandhi, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Geethu Jnaneswaran, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Gaurav Mudgal, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Athul Raj Raju, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Bisharah Rizvi, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Rutul Shah, source=Web Response No relevant relationships by Vivek Joseph Varughese, source=Web Response
Read full abstract