Ocular Surface Disease In Glaucoma Patients Research Articles

Understanding Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma: A Comparative Analysis of Symptoms and Objective Parameters.

Background Glaucoma is a progressive optic neuropathy that may result in irreversible visual impairment and can diminish quality of life. Lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) through topical eyedrops is usually the primary approach to managing glaucoma. However, long-term treatment poses a risk to ocular surface health, leading to ocular surface disease (OSD). Preservative-containing eyedrops are implicated in OSD development due to their detrimental effects on the tear film and goblet cell density. OSD symptoms may impact patient compliance due to local side effects. This study aims to assess OSD in glaucoma patients receiving topical treatment, quantify symptoms and objective ocular surface parameters, and compare them to a control group not using topical glaucoma medications. Methodology Patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma receiving topical treatment and a control group were included in this study. To assess OSD, patients completed the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire to evaluate symptoms and underwent objective measurements of ocular surface parameters using a keratograph. These parameters included assessments of bulbar redness and non-invasive keratograph tear break-up time (NIKTBUT). Results A cohort of 92 patients was subjected to examination, comprising 66 individuals diagnosed with glaucoma and 26 controls. Within the glaucoma patient subset, the mean number of IOP-lowering drugs administered was 2.42 ± 0.18, with 22.7% exclusively utilizing preservative-free eye drops. Our investigations unveiled a substantial prevalence of OSD symptoms, manifesting not only within the glaucoma cohort but also among the control group, with 72.7% and 53.8%, respectively (p = 0.224), reporting moderate-to-severe symptoms (OSDI > 23). Remarkably, OSDI scores exhibited higher values among female participants (p = 0.039) and glaucoma patients using prostaglandins (p<0.001) and were negatively correlated to the number of IOP-lowering drugs used (-0.448; p < 0.001). Furthermore, employing keratograph assessment, we discerned heightened bulbar redness (1.86 ± 0.07) in the glaucoma group compared to the control group (1.58 ± 0.07; p = 0.008). Glaucoma subgroup analyses further unveiled higher bulbar redness among glaucoma patients employing carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (p = 0.035) and applying medication preservatives (p = 0.045) but lower among individuals using beta-blockers (p = 0.018). However, the NIKTBUT did not show significant variance between the two groups (glaucoma group: 10.19 ± 0.85 seconds; control group: 10.96 ± 1.37 seconds; p = 0.499). Conclusions Our study revealed a significant prevalence of OSD in our sample, with the OSDI questionnaire showing limited specificity. The notable increase in bulbar redness pointed to an elevated prevalence of OSD among glaucoma patients, emphasizing the considerable impact of preservatives on ocular surface damage. Recognizing the potential damage to the tear film and ocular surface is crucial for glaucoma experts, who must employ comprehensive therapeutic strategies to mitigate symptoms, advocating for the preferential use of preservative-free medications, when possible, for optimizing long-term treatment.

Prevalence of Ocular Surface Disease and Associated Risk Factors in Glaucoma Patients: A Survey Study of Ophthalmologists.

This survey study of ophthalmologists investigated the prevalence and clinical manifestations of ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma patients, assessment methods used, risk factors, glaucoma drugs considered responsible, and treatment approaches. A questionnaire prepared jointly by the Turkish Ophthalmological Association Cornea and Ocular Surface Society and Glaucoma Society using SurveyMonkey was sent to ophthalmologists via e-mail. The distribution of parameters was compared with chi-square test and p&lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Forty-five percent of the ophthalmologists reported that OSD was evident in least 25% of their patients. The most common symptom was redness (91.9%), while the most common ocular surface finding was conjunctival hyperemia (75.6%). The tests considered to be the most important in ocular surface assessment were ocular staining (38.7%) and tear film break-up time (TBUT) (21.9%). Ninety percent of the physicians stated that the main cause of OSD was benzalkonium chloride (BAC) in medications. Prostaglandin analogs and alpha-2 agonists were reported to be the most common medications causing OSD. In case of OSD, the ophthalmologists often switch to a glaucoma drug from a different group (38%), a non-preservative glaucoma drug (33.7%) or a drug with a preservative other than BAC (20.4%). Most physicians prescribed artificial tears (84.6%). In this cross-sectional survey study, ophthalmologists detected varying rates of OSD in glaucoma patients depending on chronic drug use and BAC exposure. Although ocular surface examination was performed by physicians, tests such as TBUT and ocular surface staining were rarely used. Detecting OSD in glaucoma patients and planning personalized treatment increase patient comfort, drug compliance, and treatment effectiveness. For this reason, it is important to prepare an algorithm for the management of comorbid OSD in glaucoma patients.

The effects of ocular surface disease on optical coherence tomography test results in patients with glaucoma.

To evaluate the effects of current ocular surface disease (OSD) on OCT signal quality and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness measurements in patients treated with antiglaucomatous medications and the changes in these test results by dry eye treatment. Fifty-five patients, diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and OSD, who were treated for glaucoma with topical medications for at least 6 months were included in this study. Patients were treated with topical preservative free polyvinyl alcohol + povidone artificial tear drops four times a day for at least 20 days and topical loteprednol etabonate drops four times a day for 1 week. Patients were divided into groups according to the number of active substances in their glaucoma drops, daily drop numbers, and duration of drug utilizations. OCT signal quality and mean RNFL thickness measurements were evaluated within these groups before and after OSD treatment. Pre-treatment mean OCT signal quality was 19.15 ± 3.739 and mean RNFL thickness was 93.07 ± 13.931µ; post-treatment mean OCT signal quality was 23.93 ± 3.839 and mean RNFL thickness was 98.27 ± 14.863 µ (p < 0.05). Post-treatment measurements were significantly improved compared to pre-treatment measurements in our patients, but the differences among subgroups were not statistically significant. There was a strong positive correlation between pre-treatment signal quality measurements and Schirmer II test values (p < 0.0001). Treatment of OSD in glaucoma patients being treated with long-term anti-glaucoma medications, seem to improve the quality and reliability of OCT test results.

New strategies for the management of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients.

Glaucoma patients commonly suffer from ocular surface disease (OSD). As treatment strategies, medications and devices for the treatment of OSD as well as glaucoma surgical approaches evolve rapidly, it is important to consider their application to these patients. OSD in glaucoma patients may lead to reduced reliability of diagnostic tests, decreased medication compliance, poor surgical outcomes, and overall decreased quality of life. Chronic use of topical glaucoma medications has been linked to the development of limbal stem cell deficiency, and the role of preservatives in OSD continues to be demonstrated. Preservative free glaucoma medications as well as new anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of OSD are now available. Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and punctal plugs have been shown to benefit glaucoma patients with OSD. Drop burden may be reduced through the use of the new sustained-release delivery systems, selective laser trabeculoplasty, and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. There are multiple emerging strategies for managing OSD that may be applied to patients with glaucoma. With continued research and clinical experiences, we hope to better understand the multifaceted relationship between glaucoma and OSD and develop evidence-based algorithms for the management of these complex patients.

Prevalence of Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients on Long-Term Antiglaucoma Medications

Objective: Long term use of preservative-containing medications has been associated with the development or worsening of ocular surface disease (OSD). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of OSD in glaucoma patients on long-term antiglaucoma medications. Methods: A cross-sectional hospital-based study was carried out on 208 respondents using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer 1 test. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science version 22.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA). Results: The prevalence of OSD was higher in those on antiglaucoma medication using all modalities of assessment. Prevalence of OSD in glaucoma patients on antiglaucoma drugs was highest using TBUT- 69.2% (P = 0.031), with OSDI questionnaire it was 62.5% (P = 0.005), and it was lowest for Schirmer 1 test - 59.6%. For those nonglaucoma cases/not on any antiglaucoma medication, the prevalence using TBUT was 42.3%, using OSDI it was 16.3%, and with Schirmer 1 test it was 25.9%. Prevalence also increased with the increase in the number of eye drops from 1 to 2 drops/day using all modalities of assessment (P = 0.004). Using multivariate analysis, adjusting for sex and age, subjects who instilled 2 drops/day had four to five times the odds of having OSD. Conclusion: The prevalence of OSD is higher in patients with glaucoma on topical antiglaucoma medication than the nonglaucoma population studied and this increased with the increase in number of drops per day.

Understanding the Dual Dilemma of Dry Eye and Glaucoma: An International Review.

Glaucoma-related ocular surface disease (G-OSD) is a significant, yet often underdiagnosed, ocular co-morbidity affecting 40% to 59% of glaucoma patients worldwide. Although the use of topical glaucoma medications represents a proven strategy to control the untoward effects of high intraocular pressure, this treatment can profoundly disrupt the homeostasis of the tear film. The cumulative effect of medications, preservatives, and excipients alter underlying cellular structures which results in tear film abnormalities and instability of the ocular surface. Furthermore, these chronic inflammatory changes have been shown to impact efficacy of glaucoma treatment, patient compliance with therapy and overall quality of life. The pathogenesis of G-OSD is multifactorial and involves a vicious self-perpetuating cycle of inflammatory cytokines and proteins. The diagnosis of such disease is based on similar tests used in assessing traditional dry eye, taking into consideration findings specific to this patient population. The hallmark of treatment for these patients is to minimize the ocular surface inflammatory response by choosing glaucoma therapies that spare the ocular surface such as preservative free formulations and initiating dry eye treatment early in the course of care. In summary, glaucoma affects millions of patients around the world and chronic use of topical glaucoma medications may negatively impact the patient's ocular surface, symptoms, and vision. Understanding the pathogenesis of G-OSD, recognizing its risk factors and incorporating diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that restore and maintain ocular surface homeostasis will result in improved care for our patients.

&lt;p&gt;Impact of Ocular Surface Disease Treatment in Patients with Glaucoma&lt;/p&gt;

PurposeChronic topical treatment for glaucoma may lead to Ocular Surface Disease (OSD). This study aimed to evaluate: (1) the prevalence of OSD in glaucoma patients under topical treatment, quantifying symptoms and objective ocular surface parameters and (2) the impact of ocular surface treatment on OSD and IOP control.MethodsPatients with primary open angle or primary angle closure glaucoma under topical treatment for at least 6 months were enrolled in the study. Patients underwent symptom screening with the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, assessment of objective ocular surface parameters, ocular surface staining and Schirmer test. A treatment for OSD with eyelid hygiene, fluorometholone acetate 0.1%, preservative-free lubricants, free-acid supplementation and oral tetracyclin derivate was started, and the same evaluation was performed.ResultsIn our sample (n=19), 73.68% of the patients reported severe symptoms of dry eye disease, with OSDI scores higher than 33 at baseline. Tear film instability was found in 50% of patients, while 23.53% had severe meibomian gland abnormalities. Fluorescein and lissamine green stainings were abnormal in 88.24% and 82.35% of patients, respectively. After ocular surface treatment, statistically significant improvement was found in best-corrected visual acuity (p=0.0003), OSDI score (p<0.0001), bulbar redness (p=0.0196) and fluorescein staining (p<0.0001.) Mean IOP following OSD treatment reduced −1.59 mmHg from baseline in the left eye (p=0.0510).ConclusionThe prevalence of OSD signs and symptoms was high in glaucoma patients under medical treatment. Short-term OSD treatment may improve ocular surface disease and IOP control, with no need to discontinue glaucoma medications.

Ocular Surface Disease with BAK preserved Travoprost and Polyquaternium 1(Polyquad) preserved Travoprost

Introduction. The topical medications containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as preservative is known to induce corneal toxicity and ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma patients. Newer preservatives like SofZia or polyquaternium-1 (Polyquad) have been developed to replace BAK in many medications. The present study aimed at comparing the OSD in glaucoma patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost versus travoprost with polyquad as preservative and controls not receiving any medications. Methods. This prospective, controlled, observational study was conducted on patients of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) on medications for more than 6 months. The first group comprised of 40 patients receiving BAK preserved travoprost, the second group included 40 patients receiving polyquad preserved travoprost and 30 of control group not receiving any medical treatment. Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) scores using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire were assessed and compared in all subjects. Results. The mean OSDI score was 29.09 ± 13.45 in BAK group, 12.4 ± 5.085 in polyquad group and 10.93 ± 7.36 in controls. The mean difference in OSDI scores between BAK and polyquad group 16.63 (p < 0.05) and between the BAK and control group was 18.96 (p < 0.05). The mean difference in OSDI scores between the polyquad and control group was 1.53 (p > 0.05). The mean IOP in the BAK group was 19.2 ± 3.5 and in polyquad group was 20.1 ± 4.2. The IOP measured at 12 months of treatment was 13.2 ± 2.1 in BAK group and 12.8 ± 3.3 in polyquad group. The IOP measured at baseline and 12 months showed statistically significant difference in both the groups (p <o.oo1, p=o.ooo, respectively). Conclusions. OSDI scores revealed significantly lesser symptoms in polyquad preserved travoprost when compared to BAK preserved travoprost. The OSDI scores in polyquad group were also comparable to the control group. Hence, for long term glaucoma management polyquad containing travoprost should be preferred over the BAK preserved travoprost.

Evaluation of Ocular Surface Disease in Patients With Glaucoma: Clinical Parameters, Self-report Assessment, and Keratograph Analysis.

To assess ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma using clinical parameters, self-report assessment, and keratograph analysis. A total of 30 glaucoma patients and 27 subjects with cataracts (control group) were enrolled in the study. Only glaucoma patients who were using at least 1 topical intraocular pressure-lowering medication were included. An ophthalmological examination was performed, including tear break-up time (BUT), assessment of conjunctival hyperemia and keratitis, and completion of the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. All the patients underwent keratograph analysis including noninvasive BUT, meibography, tear meniscus height, and redness scale. Quality of life was also assessed in all the patients using National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ)-25. The comparison of OSD between the 2 groups was assessed. There was a significant difference in OSD: keratitis and conjunctival hyperemia were worse in the glaucoma group (P=0.009 and 0.008, respectively). The glaucoma group had significantly worse scores on the OSDI questionnaire (32.53±20.75 vs. 20.42±18.77; P=0.007). For the keratograph assessment, the glaucoma group had significantly smaller tear meniscus height (0.22±0.08 vs. 0.24±0.04, respectively; P=0.041); worse bulbar redness (2.06±0.67 vs. 1.70±0.45, respectively; P=0.021); higher meibography grades (2.34±1.01 vs. 1.52±0.64, respectively; P=0.001); and worse noninvasive keratograph tear BUT (5.45±4.16 vs. 8.40±5.65, respectively; P=0.023). Patients with glaucoma had a worse quality of life (60.73±18.25 vs. 76.62±8.03, respectively; P=0.039). Our findings not only confirm the high prevalence of clinical findings of OSD in glaucoma patients but also reveal new objective parameters measured by keratograph analysis.