-In samples totalling 16 leopard frogs, R. chiricahuensis and R. pipiens, two triploid hybrids were found, both from a collection of four frogs from a sympatric locality. Analysis of the normal karyotype of R. chiricahuensis shows it to be extremely similar to that of R. pipiens. It was thus not possible to identify the three chromosome sets in the triploids cytologically. C-banding was weak, indicating that little heterochromatin was present. Electrophoretic evidence based on 21 isozyme loci indicates one hybrid to be 2 chiricahuensis, 1 pipiens and the other to be 1 chiricahuensis, 2 pipiens. The unexpectedly high occurrence of triploid hybrids may be due to higher viability of triploids relative to diploid hybrids. The many species of frogs of the Rana pipiens complex of North America are known to hybridize to varying degrees (Sage and Selander, 1979; Frost and Platz, 1983). Four species of this complex inhabit southern Arizona: R. pipiens, R. blairi, R. chiricahuensis and R. yavapiensis (Platz, 1976; Frost and Bagnara, 1977; Platz and Mecham, 1979; Platz and Frost, 1984). R. chiricahuensis, perhaps the most distinctive of these four leopard frog species in southern Arizona (Hillis et al., 1983), occurs sympatrically with R. pipiens, R. blairi and R. yavapaiensis, whose ranges are for the most part mutually allopatric. Frost and Platz (1983) have reported about 9% occurrence of natural hybrids between sympatric R. chiricahuensis and R. pipiens, with little or no backcrossing. In appearance, R. chiricahuensis is a more robust looking frog than R. pipiens, with a noticeably wider head and shorter legs and cream-colored spots on the poste3 Present address: Department of Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada. 4 Present address: Division of Hematology-Oncology, New England Medical Center, 171 Harrison Ave., Box 841, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 02111. rior thigh; it also has a different mating call (Platz and Mecham, 1979). In a collection of 16 frogs from three sites in Arizona (sympatric and allopatric R. chiricahuensis and R. pipiens), we found one triploid individual through an initial survey of karyotypes and noted that it had what appeared to be an intermediate, hybrid morphology. A ubsequent electrophoretic examination of all the specimens was undert ken to verify its suspected genotype and revealed, in addition, that another specimen we had earlier referred to R. pipiens was also a hybrid with an electrophoretic pattern again suggesting polyploidy. We report here on these findings and, with an analysis of the normal karyotype of R. chiricahuensis, discuss the possible significance of polyploidy in these wild-caught, hybrid individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS All specimens were obtained from sites in Coconino National Forest, Coconino Co., Arizona in 1981 as follows: six allopatric R. pipiens from Fuller Tank (34040' x 111?20'), six allopatric R. chiricahuensis from New Tank (34032' x 111? 29') and three R. chiricahuensis (one later confirmed as a hybrid) and one R. pipThis content downloaded from 157.55.39.215 on Wed, 31 Aug 2016 05:06:31 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms D. M. GREEN AND D. M. DELISLE 41iil( ai a 4 t xx xx ..x xx A.X x 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 FIG. 1. Normal karyotype of Rana chiricahuensis (MVZ No. 176678), Baker Lake, Arizona. iens (later confirmed as a hybrid) from the sympatric locality Baker Lake (34? 27' x 111?23'). The specimens have been deposited in the Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (MVZ 176676-92). Chromosome preparations were obtained from squashes of corneal epithelium, using Bogart's (1973, 1981) methods, and of gut and testis, using the methods of Kezer and Sessions (1979). C-banding of chromosomes was attempted using Schmid's (1978) methods. Numerical analyses of karyotypes was done using the CHROMPAC system (Green et al., 1980, 1984). Starch gel electrophoresis employed methods described by Selander et al. (1971) and Clayton and Tretiak (1972).