Obstructed Defecation Syndrome Score Research Articles

Pelvic floor imaging in asymptomatic subjects.

The aim of this work was to determine the range of normal imaging features during total pelvic floor ultrasound (TPFUS) (transperineal, transvaginal, endovaginal and endoanal) and defaecation MRI (dMRI). Twenty asymptomatic female volunteers (mean age 36.5 years) were prospectively investigated with dMRI and TPFUS. Subjects were screened with symptom questionnaires (ICIQ-B, St Mark's faecal incontinence score, obstructed defaecation syndrome score, ICIQ-V, BSAQ). dMRI and TPFUS were performed and interpreted by blinded clinicians according to previously published methods. The subjects comprised six parous and 14 nulliparous women, of whom three were postmenopausal. There were three with a rectocoele on both modalities and one with a rectocoele on dMRI only. There was one with intussusception on TPFUS. Two had an enterocoele on both modalities and one on TPFUS only. There were six with a cystocoele on both modalities, one on dMRI only and one on TPFUS only. On dMRI, there were 12 with functional features. Four also displayed functional features on TPFUS. Two displayed functional features on TPFUS only. This study demonstrates the presence of abnormal findings on dMRI and TPFUS without symptoms. There was a high rate of functional features on dMRI. This series is not large enough to redefine normal parameters but is helpful for appreciating the wide range of findings seen in health.

Long-term outcomes of total colectomy for severe constipation.

Surgery for constipation is usually reserved for patients with severe and refractory symptoms because of concerns about perioperative morbidity and unpredictable functional outcomes. The aim of this paper is to identify the long-term outcomes of patients who have undergone total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for severe constipation. Patients who had undergone a total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for severe constipation were identified from a prospectively maintained database and sent a postal survey assessing functional symptoms, patient satisfaction and the impact of symptoms on quality of life. Information regarding the surgery, perioperative complications and hospitalizations were also collected. Functional outcomes of the surgery were evaluated with the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index, St Marks incontinence score, Wexner continence score, obstructed defaecation syndrome score and Cleveland Clinic constipation score. Seventy-one questionnaires were posted and 32 (45%) patients responded. The mean time since surgery was 15.3 years (range 2.9-30.4 years) Most patients were happy with the surgery. Ongoing symptoms were common, the most frequent of these were abdominal pain, experienced by 23 patients (71.9%), and faecal incontinence, experienced by 17 patients (53%). Fourteen patients (43.8%) required subsequent hospital admission due to bowel obstruction and eight patients (25%%) had subsequent surgery for adhesions. There was an association between patient quality of life and subsequent surgeries. Most patients were happy and viewed their life as improved following total colectomy for severe constipation. This is despite a high rate of ongoing functional symptoms.

The Relevance of the Excessive Perineal Descent in the Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: A Prospective Study of 141 Patients.

Despite the widely accepted association between excessive straining and perineal descent, the clinical significance of perineal descent in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pathological perineal descent in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome and the impact of perineal descent on symptoms severity. This was a prospective multicenter uncontrolled study. The study involved 3 hospital pelvic-care centers and was conducted from January 2018 to January 2022. The study included 141 consecutive adult patients with an obstructed defecation syndrome score of 9 or more and no evidence of organic GI pathology. All the patients underwent dynamic pelvic MRI and, in case of suspected paradoxical puborectalis contraction, anal manometry. Main outcome measures were the prevalence of excessive perineal descent and the correlation between perineal descent and obstructed defecation syndrome score. One hundred twenty-eight patients (90.7%) completed magnetic resonance examination and were included in the analysis. Of these, 18 patients (14.1%) had a physiological perineal descent and 110 (85.9%) had an excessive perineal descent. Excessive perineal descent was found in 46.1% of patients (12/26) with MRI signs of paradoxical puborectalis contraction and in 96% of patients (98/102) with normal puborectalis relaxation. In this latter group of patients, a good correlation between obstructed defecation syndrome score and maximum perineal descent during straining was found (Spearman r test: 0.68; p < 0.0001). The study was limited by the small sample size and by the strong selection of the study population. Excessive perineal descent is a common finding in patients with obstructed defecation syndrome and high symptoms score, occurring almost consistently in patients without paradoxical puborectalis contraction. In these patients, the maximum perineal descent seems to be well correlated with symptoms severity. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C135 . ANTECEDENTES:A pesar de la asociación ampliamente aceptada entre el esfuerzo excesivo y el descenso perineal, la importancia clínica del descenso perineal en pacientes con síndrome de defecación obstruida aún no está clara.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la prevalencia del descenso perineal patológico en pacientes con síndrome de defecación obstruida y el impacto del descenso perineal en la severidad de los síntomas.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio prospectivo multicéntrico no controladoENTORNO CLINICO:El estudio involucró a tres centros hospitalarios de atención pélvica y se llevó a cabo entre enero de 2018 y enero de 2022.PACIENTES:El estudio incluyó a 141 pacientes adultos consecutivos con puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstruida ≥ 9 y sin evidencia de patología gastrointestinal orgánica. A todas las pacientes se les realizó resonancia magnética pélvica dinámica y, en caso de sospecha de contracción puborrectal paradójica, manometría anal.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron la prevalencia del descenso perineal excesivo y la correlación entre el descenso perineal y la puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstruida.RESULTADOS:Ciento veintiocho (90,7%) pacientes completaron el examen de resonancia magnética y fueron incluidos en el análisis. De estos, 18 (14,1%) presentaron descenso perineal fisiológico y 110 (85,9%) descenso perineal excesivo. Se encontró descenso perineal excesivo en el 46,1% (12/26) de los pacientes con signos de contracción puborrectal paradójica en la resonancia magnética y en el 96% (98/102) de los pacientes con relajación puborrectal normal. En estos últimos pacientes se encontró una buena correlación entre la puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstruida y el descenso perineal máximo durante el esfuerzo (prueba r de Spearman: 0,68; p < 0,0001).LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por el pequeño tamaño de la muestra y por la fuerte selección de la población de estudio.CONCLUSIONES:El descenso perineal excesivo es un hallazgo común en pacientes con síndrome de defecación obstruida y alto puntaje de síntomas, ocurriendo casi constantemente en pacientes sin contracción puborrectal paradójica. En estos últimos pacientes el descenso perineal máximo parece estar bien correlacionado con la severidad de los síntomas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCRC135 . (Traducción- Dr. Francisco M. Abarca-Rendon ).

Tailoring surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome to the ‘iceberg diagram’: Long-term results

BackgroundPatients with obstructed defecation syndrome may present with a wide spectrum of disorders. The iceberg diagram, which focuses on the underlying occult diseases, has been proposed for an accurate diagnosis. The iceberg diagram deals with lesions, which, if neglected, may worsen the prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of using the iceberg diagram on the clinical results. MethodsPatients operated for obstructed defecation syndrome based on the iceberg diagram between 2008 and 2018 were evaluated pre- and postsurgery. All patients underwent psychosomatic assessment, abdominal and perineal examination, proctoscopy, vaginoscopy, transanal ultrasound, and defecography. Postoperative complications were also evaluated. ResultsOf the 80 operated patients, 73 were females; median age was 47 (range 26–78) years. All had a rectal internal mucosal prolapse and 85% had a rectocele. The most frequent occult diseases were functional (mental distress [46%]) or organic (colpo-cysto-enterocele [44%]). Surgery was tailored according to the iceberg diagram with prolapsectomy and rectocele repair the most commonly used among 8 different procedures. A total of 14% of patients had a postoperative complication. Median follow-up was 72 months. Obstructed defecation syndrome score significantly decreased from 10.5 ± 4.8 (mean + standard deviation) to 3.4 ± 3.6 (P < .01) and 68% of patients reported to be either improved or cured. ConclusionThe use of the iceberg diagram in obstructed defecation syndrome patients assists in identifying latent “submerged lesions’ that may negatively impact the functional outcome of surgery. A clinical approach to patients with obstructed defecation syndrome tailored according to the iceberg diagram allows the identification of occult lesions and to achieve good long-term results.

Predictive factors for functional failure of ventral mesh rectopexy in the treatment of rectal prolapse and obstructed defecation

BackgroundVentral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is widely accepted for the treatment of rectal prolapse or obstructed defecation. However, despite good anatomical results, the improvement of functional symptoms (constipation or incontinence) cannot always be obtained and in some cases these symptoms may even worsen. The aim of the present study was to identify possible predictors of functional failure after VMR.MethodsData of all consecutive patients who had VMR for the treatment of rectal prolapse and/or obstructed defecation between January 2017 and December 2020 in three different pelvic floor surgical centres in Italy were analysed to identify possible predictors of functional failure, intended as persistence, worsening or new onset of constipation or faecal incontinence. Symptom severity was assessed pre- and postoperatively with the Wexner Constipation score and Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score. Quality of life was assessed, also before and after treatment, with the Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life questionnaire, the Pelvic Floor Disability Index and the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Faecal incontinence was evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. The functional outcomes before and after surgery were compared.ResultsSixty-one patients were included (M:F ratio 3:60, median age 64 years [range 33–88 years]). Forty-two patients (68.9%) had obstructed defecation syndrome, 12(19.7%) had faecal incontinence and 7 patients (11.5%) had both. A statistically significant reduction between pre- and postoperative Obstructed Defecation Syndrome and Wexner scores was reported (p < 0.0001 in both cases). However, the postoperative presence of constipation occurred in 22 patients (36.1%) (this included 3 cases of new-onset constipation). The presence of redundant colon and the pre-existent constipation were associated with an increased risk of persistence of constipation postoperatively or new-onset constipation (p = 0.004 and p < 0.0001, respectively). The use of postoperative pelvic floor rehabilitation (p = 0.034) may reduce the risk of postoperative constipation.ConclusionsVMR is a safe and effective intervention for correcting the anatomical defect of rectal prolapse. The degree of prolapse, the presence of dolichocolon and pre-existing constipation are risk factors for the persistence or new onset of postoperative constipation. Postoperative rehabilitation treatment may reduce this risk.

Correlation Between Poor Defecation Habits and Postoperative Hemorrhoid Recurrence.

BackgroundThe relationship between hemorrhoid recurrence and poor defecation habits is poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the effects of poor defecation habits on postoperative hemorrhoid recurrence.Materials and MethodWe performed a retrospective study on 1,162 consecutive patients who underwent a surgical procedure for hemorrhoids at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from December 2016 to May 2020. All patients were followed for 12 months post-operatively. Patients were monitored for disease recurrence. Patient defecation habits were assessed using an obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) score.ResultsPatients with a score of 0–4 had a mild defecation disorder, 5–8 a moderate defecation disorder, and 9 or more ODS. Of the 1,162 patients, 1,144 (98.45%) had a mild defecation disorder, 13 (1.12%) had a moderate defecation disorder, and 9 (0.43%) had ODS. Older patients were significantly more likely to have worse defecation habits (P < 0.001). A higher ODS score correlated with a higher maximum anal squeeze pressure (P = 0.07) and a more severe inability for the anus to relax during simulated evacuation (P = 0.002). The maximum rectum threshold was also found to be the highest in ODS patients (P = 0.010). The proportion of Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) was the highest in the moderate defecation disorder group (53.85), followed by the ODS group (40.00) and the mild defecation disorder group (P = 0.023). Recurrence occurred in 5.51% of patients in the mild defecation disorder group, 38.46% of the moderate defecation disorder group, and 60% of the ODS group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher ODS score (P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of recurrence. Furthermore, patients who occasionally exercised (P = 0.01) and patients who exercised regularly (P = 0.021) were less likely to have a recurrence.ConclusionPatients with unresolved defecation disorders are more likely to have their hemorrhoids recur and are unlikely to be satisfied with surgical management.

Reappraising the Role of Enterocele in the Obstructed Defecation Syndrome: Is Radiological Impaired Rectal Emptying Significant in Enterocele?

Objectives: The role of enterocele in the obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) has remained to be controversial, as patients with enterocele frequently exhibit multiple risk factors, including aging, parity, concomitant different abnormalities, previous histories of pelvic surgery, and incomplete emptying of the rectum. Thus, in this study, we aimed to investigate the association between enterocele and ODS using multivariate analysis. Methods: Between June 2013 and June 2021, 336 women underwent defecography as they had symptoms of ODS. Of those, 293 women (87%) who had anatomical abnormalities were included in this study. Results: Enterocele was detected in 104 (36%) patients. More women with enterocele had histories of hysterectomy compared to those without enterocele (29% vs. 10%, P < 0.0001). The frequency of radiological incomplete emptying was found to be significantly lower in women with enterocele (36%) than in those without enterocele (50%), whereas the mean (95% confidence interval) ODS scores in women with enterocele were significantly higher than those without enterocele [12.1 (11.0-13.3) versus 10.8 (10.5-11.5), P = 0.023]. As per the results of our multivariate analysis, it was determined that the presence of enterocele was associated with higher ODS scores (P = 0.028). However, the small differences in the mean score (1.3) would be clinically negligible. The specific radiological type of enterocele which compressed the rectal ampulla at the beginning of defecation was not associated with the increased ODS scores. Conclusions: The presence of enterocele may not be a primary cause of ODS. Other anatomical abnormalities combined with enterocele, or the hernia itself, may have a role in causing ODS.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of puborectalis division in the treatment of anismus.

Anismus is a common cause of obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The aim of the present review is to assess the efficacy and safety of puborectalis muscle (PRM) division in the treatment of anismus. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies that assessed the outcome of PRM division in the treatment of anismus. The main outcome measures were subjective improvement in ODS, decrease in the Wexner constipation score and ODS score, and complications, namely faecal incontinence (FI). Ten studies (204 patients, 63.7% male) were included. The weighted mean rate of initial subjective improvement across randomized trials was 97.6% (95% CI 94%-100%) and across nonrandomized studies it was 63.1 (95% CI 39.3%-87%). The weighted mean rate of 12-month improvement across randomized trials was 64.9% (95% CI 53.3%-76.4%) and across nonrandomized studies it was 55.9% (95% CI 30.8%-81%). The weighted mean rate of FI across randomized trials was 12.1% (95% CI 4.2%-20%) and across nonrandomized studies it was 10.4% (95% CI 1.6%-19.3%). Male sex and unilateral PRM division were significantly associated with recurrence of symptoms after PRM division. Bilateral PRM division, posterior division, complete division and concomitant sphincterotomy were significantly associated with FI after PRM division. The use of PRM division for treatment of anismus was followed by some initial improvement in ODS symptoms which decreased to <60% 12months after PRM division. The mean rate of FI after PRM division, namely 10%-12%, is a limitation of the technique. Further well-designed trials are needed to verify the outcome of PRM division in the treatment of anismus.

Obstructed defecation syndrome in the first week after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Research shows that patients are concerned about postoperative bowel function after pelvic reconstructive surgery. The objectives of this study were to estimate the proportion of patients with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS), a subtype of constipation, in the week after surgery, to identify associated patient-level and perioperative characteristics and the associated bother. Women completed a preoperative and postoperative ODS questionnaire and postoperative bowel diary. Characteristics of women with and without postoperative ODS were compared. Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests compared categorical variables. Student's t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared continuous variables. Multivariate logistic regression was assessed for independent effects. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared the groups with regard to bother. Spearman correlation coefficients described the relationship among bother, postoperative ODS score, and bowel diary variables. Of the 186 participants enrolled, 165 completed the postoperative ODS questionnaire. Of these, 39 women (23.6%, 95% CI 17.2-30.1) had postoperative ODS. Postoperative ODS was significantly associated with preoperative ODS (p < 0.001), posterior colporrhaphy (p = 0.03), surgery type (p = 0.01), and longer duration of surgery (p = 0.03). Using multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, only preoperative ODS was significantly associated with postoperative ODS (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.73-4.17). Women with postoperative ODS reported more bother with their defecatory symptoms (p < 0.001). The degree of bother was significantly associated with postoperative ODS score (p < 0.001). Using a validated disease-specific questionnaire to identify ODS, this complication was identified in 23.6% of patients in the week after pelvic reconstructive surgery. Preoperative ODS was a significant and important risk factor for this complication.

Anatomo-functional outcomes of the laparoscopic Frykman-Goldberg procedure for rectal prolapse in a tertiary referral centre.

Rectal prolapse is a common disorder that represents a burden for patients due to the associated symptoms that may include both incontinence and constipation. Currently, a huge variation in techniques exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomo-functional results of the laparoscopic Frykman-Goldberg procedure (LFGP) for the treatment of both internal (IRP) and complete rectal prolapse (CRP). Between July 2004 and October 2019, 45 patients with IRP and CRP underwent a LFGP. The Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), Obstructed Defecation Syndrome Score (ODSS) and Vaizey Score (VS) were assessed preoperatively, 3months before the procedure, 12months after the procedures and at the final follow-up visit. The patients' mean age was 51.4 ± 17.9 (15-93) years, and the mean follow-up was 9.24 ± 4.57 (1.6-16.3) years. The VS, CCCS and ODSS significantly improved (p = 0.008; p < 0.001; p < 0.001) from median preoperative values of 3, 20 and 18 to 2, 6 and 5, respectively. Furthermore, the improvements in scores during follow-up remained constant and significant over time when considering the two groups separately (time effect for ODSS p < 0.001, for VS p = 0.026, for CCCS p < 0.001) and when the patients were divided by age (< 40, 41-60 and > 60; p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 8.9% (4/45), and no intraoperative complications or anastomotic leakage occurred. Conversion to the open approach was not necessary in any case. The overall success rate was 97.7%, and only one recurrence in the IRP group occurred after 14months. LRGP can be considered a safe, effective and long-lasting procedure in young patients with IRP or CRP, a history of ODS and a redundant sigmoid colon.

A step-by-step approach to endorectal proctopexy (ERPP): how we do it.

There are many surgical treatments aimed at correcting internal mucosal prolapse and rectocele associated with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Perineal procedures can be considered as first options in young men in whom an abdominal approach poses risks of sexual dysfunction and in selected women with isolated posterior compartment prolapse who failed conservative treatment. About 20years ago, we described endorectal proctopexy (ERPP) also known as internal Delorme procedure. The aim of the present study was to describe, with attention to technical details and the aid of a video, the different steps of ERPP for the treatment of ODS. A retrospective analysis of our last 100 cases confirms our initial good results. Complications included suture line dehiscence with consequent stricture in four patients (4%). Bleeding occurred in four (4%) patients and was conservatively treated. Transient anal continence impairment consisting of urgency and soiling occurred in 12 (12%) and 6 (6%) patients, respectively. At 6-month follow-up the Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score and ODS score improved from a median preoperative value of 18.9 and 18.5 to 5 and 5, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean follow-up was 36.05 ± 13.3 (range 12-58) months and anatomical recurrence rate was 6 (%). Due to its excellent safety profile and the ability to tailor the procedure to different disease presentations, we think that ERPP should be part of the basic armamentarium of all colorectal surgeons operating on the pelvic floor.

Obstructed defecation syndrome associated with paradoxical puborectalis contraction: osteopathic treatment versus anal biofeedback. Results of a pilot study.

Biofeedback is the most widespread rehabilitative therapy for the treatment of anismus after failed conservative treatment. Osteopathy represents an alternative therapy for constipation. The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of osteopathic treatment as compared to biofeedback in patients with dyssynergic defecation. This was a prospective cohort pilot study on 30 patients with dyssynergic defecation enrolled at the Colorectal Clinic of the University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy, from May 2015 to May 2016 and followed until May 2020. Dyssynergic defecation was defined as the inappropriate contraction of the pelvic floor or less than 20% relaxation of basal resting sphincter pressure (on anal manometry) with adequate propulsive forces during attempted defecation. Dyssynergic patients were divide into 2 treatment groups: 15 patients had osteopathy and 15 patients had biofeedback. Before and 3months after rehabilitation treatment, all patients had anorectal manometry, defecography, and ultrasound, and were evaluated with the Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) constipation score, obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, Colo-rectal-anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8), Colo-rectal-anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ-7), and the Brusciano Score (BS). To evaluate the efficacy of osteopathy and biofeedback in the long-term, all patients completed the above-mentioned questionnaires 5years later via a telephone interview. The two treatments were similarly effective in the short term with reduction in questionnaires scores, and increase in the percentage of anal sphincter release at straining at anorectal manometry in both groups. The ODS score was significantly reduced in biofeedback group (p = 0.021). The 3-month post-treatment BS was lower in the osteopathy group, but this just failed to reach statistical significance (p = 0.050). Periodic rehabilitation reinforcements were provided. The CCF constipation score decreased significantly in the osteopathy group (p = 0.023) after 5years. Osteopathy is a promising treatment for dyssynergic defecation, and it can be associated with biofeedback.

Rectal Prolapse: Age-Related Differences in Clinical Presentation and What Bothers Women Most.

Rectal prolapse has a diverse symptom profile that affects patients of all ages. We sought to identify bothersome symptoms and clinical presentation that motivated patients who have rectal prolapse to seek care, characterize differences in symptom severity with age, and determine factors associated with bothersome symptoms. This study is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained registry. This study was conducted at a tertiary referral academic center. Included were 129 consecutive women with full-thickness rectal prolapse. The main outcomes measured were primary bothersome symptoms, 5-item Cleveland Clinic/Wexner Fecal Incontinence questionnaire, and the 5-item Obstructed Defecation Syndrome questionnaire. Patients were categorized by age <65 vs age ≥65 years. Cleveland Clinic/Wexner Fecal Incontinence score >9 was more common in older patients (87% vs 60%, p = 0.002). Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score >8 was more common in younger patients (57% vs 28%, p < 0.001). Older patients were more likely than younger patients to report bothersome symptoms of pain (38% vs 19%, p = 0.021) and bleeding (12% vs 2%, p = 0.046). Mucus discharge was reported by most patients (older, 72% vs younger, 66%, p = 0.54) but was bothersome for only 18%, regardless of age. Older patients had more severe prolapse expression than younger patients (at rest, 33% vs 11%; during activity, 26% vs 19%; only with defecation, 40% vs 64%, p = 0.006). Older patients were more likely to seek care within 6 months of prolapse onset (29% vs 11%, p = 0.056). On multivariable regression, increasing age, narcotic use, and nonprotracting prolapse at rest were associated with reporting pain as a primary concern. This was a single-center study with a small sample size. Rectal prolapse-related bothersome symptoms and health care utilization differ by age. Although rectal pain is often not commonly associated with prolapse, it bothers many women and motivates older women to undergo evaluation. Patient-reported functional questionnaires may not reflect patients' primary concerns regarding specific symptoms and could benefit from supplementation with questionnaires to elicit individualized symptom priorities. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B492. INFLUENCIA DE LA EDAD EN DIFERENCIAS VINCULADAS CON LA PRESENTACIÓN CLÍNICA Y LOS SÍNTOMAS MAS DESAGRADABLES: El prolapso de recto tiene una gran variedad de síntomas que afectan a pacientes con edades diferentes.Identificar los síntomas mas molestos y la presentación clínica que motivaron a los pacientes con un prolapso de recto a consultar por atención médica, caracterizar las diferencias de gravedad de los síntomas con relación a la edad y determinar los factores asociados con los síntomas mas molestos.Análisis retrospectivo de un registro prospectivo.Centro académico de referencia terciaria.Consecutivamente 129 mujeres que presentaban un prolapso rectal completo.Síntomas y molestias primarias, cuestionario de incontinencia fecal de la Cleveland Clinic / Wexner de 5 ítems, cuestionario de síndrome de defecación obstruida de 5 ítems. Los pacientes fueron categorizados en < 65 años versus ≥ 65 años.El puntaje de incontinencia fecal de la Cleveland Clinic / Wexner > 9 fue más común en pacientes mayores (87% vs 60%, p = 0.002). La puntuación del síndrome de defecación obstructiva > 8 fue más común en pacientes más jóvenes (57% vs 28%, p <0,001). Los pacientes mayores fueron más propensos que los pacientes jóvenes a informar síntomas y molestias de dolor (38% vs 19%, p = 0.021) y sangrado (12% vs 2%, p = 0.046). La mayoría de los pacientes informaron secresión de moco (mayores, 72% frente a más jóvenes, 66%, p = 0,54), pero sólo el 18% tuvo molestias, independientemente de la edad. Los pacientes mayores tenían una exteriorización de prolapso más grave que los pacientes jóvenes (en reposo, 33% frente a 11%; durante la actividad, 26% frente a 19%; solo con defecación, 40% frente a 64%, p = 0,006). Los pacientes mayores tenían más probabilidades de buscar atención médica dentro de los 6 meses posteriores al inicio del prolapso (29% frente a 11%, p = 0.056). Tras la regresión multivariable, el aumento de la edad, el uso de narcóticos y el prolapso no prolongado en reposo se asociaron con la notificación de dolor como queja principal.Centro único; tamaño de muestra pequeño.Los síntomas y molestias relacionadas con el prolapso rectal y la solicitud de atención médica difieren según la edad. Aunque el dolor rectal a menudo no se asocia comúnmente con el prolapso, incomoda a muchas pacientes y motiva a las mujeres mayores a someterse a un examen médico. Los cuestionarios funcionales con las respuestas de las pacientes pueden no reflejar las preocupaciones principales de éstos con respecto a los síntomas específicos y podrían requerir cuestionarios complementarios para así obtener prioridades individualizadas con relación a los síntomas identificados. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B492. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo).

Stapled trans-anal rectal resection for the surgical management of obstructed defecation syndrome: our experience in Bangladesh

Background: Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is one of the commonest constipation related disorders confronted by surgeons in Bangladesh. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) is a novel surgical technique specific for ODS. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of STARR on patients with ODS in Bangladesh.&#x0D; Methods: Thirty (30) female patients (age: 46±13.2 years) with ODS, were selected for this observational study, from July 2016 to July 2019, in a private hospital of Dhaka. Patients were interviewed with standardized questionnaire at study enrolment and up to 3 months postoperatively. Surgical outcome was quantified according to the Longo’s Modified ODS score (MODS).&#x0D; Results: At initial consultation, the mean Longo’s MODS score was 17.6+1.9. Mean operative time was 39+6.2 minutes. Commonest complication was ‘staple line bleeding’ in 24(80%) patients intraoperatively &amp; ‘defecatory urgency’ in 18(60 %) patients postoperatively. At postoperative 3-month follow-up, statistically significant (p&lt;0.05) symptomatic improvement in Longo’s MODS score (6.9+2.5) was observed in 27(90%) patients. Ten (33.3%) of patients judged their final clinical outcome as ‘excellent’, 11(36.7%) as ‘good’, and 6(20%) as ‘moderate’, with 3(10%) having ‘poor/no improvement’.&#x0D; Conclusion: After analyzing our results, we conclude that STARR is an effective procedure for the treatment of ODS due to structural abnormalities and can be performed safely without any major morbidity.&#x0D; Birdem Med J 2021; 11(1): 11-16

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome: Follow-up in the Indian population.

Context:Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) is a poorly understood cause of constipation. In selected patients not responding to conservative management, surgical options may be offered. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is another surgical option which gained popularity in the past decade.Aim:This study aims to identify the efficacy of LVMR in the Indian population.Setting and Design:It is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients who underwent LVMR from January 2015 to January 2017 at a tertiary centre in India.Subjects and Methods:Thirty patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients were periodically followed for 2 years. Pre- and post-operative modified Longo's ODS scores were recorded and compared. Furthermore, other complications were noted and evaluated.Statistical Analysis Used:Relevant statistical tests were used to analyse the collected data.Results:Thirty patients (28 females, 2 males, mean age: 52.4 years) underwent LVMR for ODS due to anatomical abnormality like rectorectal intussusceptions (RRIs) (36.7%), rectocele (13.3%), or combined RRI with rectocele (50%). The mean pre-operative modified Longo's ODS score was 23.17 ± 4.82 which decreased to 2.37 ± 1.59 at the end of 6 months and 1.23 ± 1.14 and 1.57 ± 1.14 at the end of 12 months and 2 years, respectively. The mean modified Longo's ODS score showed a significant fall of 94.7% at 12-month follow-up and 93.2% fall on 2-year follow-up. The mean operative time was 115 min and the average hospital stay of patients who underwent LVMR was 3.26 days.Conclusion:LVMR is a safe surgical procedure with minimal complications and good functional results for ODS patients due to rectal anatomical abnormality. Further larger studies are required to decide the best treatment modality for ODS.

A tailored rhomboid mucocutaneous advancement flap to treat anal stenosis.

Anal stenosis (AS) is a rare but disabling disorder that often represents a complication of anorectal surgery. The aim of our study was to assess the safety and functional outcome of a modified rhomboid flap (MRF) in the treatment of moderate and severe AS. Between January 2002 and September 2017, 50 consecutive patients with moderate and severe AS who underwent an MRF were retrospectively included. Anal continence (Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score) and symptoms (Obstructed Defaecation Syndrome Score) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 12months. Furthermore, anal calibre was measured both preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 6 and 12months. The mean follow-up period was 97±48.3 (33-180) months. The main aetiology was a previous excisional haemorrhoidectomy (N=23; 46%). The mean preoperative anal calibre was 9.96±2.68 (5-15) mm and there was a statistically significant improvement in all three periods (P<0.0001) of postoperative evaluation (1, 6 and 12months) with a mean difference, obtained comparing preoperative and 12months anal calibre, of 14.1 ± 2.72 (P<0.0001). Statistically significant improvement in both Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and Obstructed Defaecation Syndrome Score was observed in all patients at 12months. The overall success rate was 96% (48/50 patients). The use of an MRF is a safe and suitable option for the treatment of moderate and severe AS. The possibility of tailoring the flap, based on the degree as well as the level of AS, is the key.

Comparison of pre and post-operative ODS (Obstructed Defecation Syndrome) score in patient with ODS undergoing Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR)

Background: There are a variety of surgical approaches for correction of ODS, most of these have high recurrence and complication rates. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) was introduced in 2003 by Antonio Longo as a minimally invasive transanal operation for ODS associated with rectocele and or rectal intussusception.&#x0D; Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy of Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) as a surgical treatment of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome(ODS).&#x0D; Methodology: This is a quasi experimental study that was carried out at Colorectal surgery unit of surgery department in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University. The sample size was 17. The admitted patient of Obstructed Defecation Syndrome with Rectocele and or Rectal intussusception was selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The patient was evaluated by history, clinical examination, proctoscopy, colonoscopy and defecography. Preoperative Longo’s ODS score was determined for each patient and it was compared with postoperative ODS score. Regular follow up was done for each patient at one, three and six months after each operation.&#x0D; Results: Significant improvement of ODS score was observed in 82.35% patients. Only 02 (11.8%) patients didn’t respond to STARR procedure and their postoperative score was 13-15 may be due to coexistence of pelvic floor dysynergy. Postoperative defecatory urgency developed only in 02(11.76%) patients. No patient developed significant postoperative complication like hemorrhage or rectovaginal fistula.&#x0D; Conclusion: STARR is a simple, less invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and/or rectal intussusception without major morbidity but pelvic floor dyssynergy should be excluded preoperatively because it’s presence makes the surgical intervention fruitless.&#x0D; Journal of Surgical Sciences (2019) Vol. 23(2): 67-70

Mucopexy-Recto Anal Lifting (MuRAL) in managing obstructed defecation syndrome associated with prolapsed hemorrhoids and rectocele: preliminary results.

PurposeTreatment of rectocele associated with prolapsed hemorrhoids is a debated topic. Transanal stapling achieved good midterm results in patients with symptoms of obstructed defecation, nevertheless a number of severe complications have been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new endorectal manual technique in patients with obstructed defecation due to the combination of muco-hemorrhoidal prolapse and rectocele.MethodsPatients enrolled after preoperative obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score, defecography and anoscopy were submitted to the novel Mucopexy-Recto Anal Lifting (MuRAL) combined with a modified Block procedure, and followed up by independent observers with digital exploration 3 weeks postoperatively, and digital exploration plus anoscopy at 3, 6, and 12 months. Operative time, hospital stay, numerating rating scale (NRS), ODS, satisfaction scores, and recurrence rate were recorded.ResultsMean operative time was 35.7 minutes. Fifty-six patients completed 1-year follow-up: 7.1% had acute urinary retention, NRS score was < 3 from the third postoperative day, mean time of daily activity resumption was 12 days, none had persistent fecal urgency, 82% declared excellent/good satisfaction score, significant improvement of 6- and 12-month ODS score, no recurrence of rectocele, and 7.1% recurrence of prolapsed hemorrhoids were observed.ConclusionMuRAL associated with modified Block technique gave no severe complications and resulted in a safe and effective approach to symptomatic rectocele associated with muco-rectal prolapse. Further randomized studies, larger series, and longer follow-up are needed.

Assessment of anal sphincter distensibility following the STARR procedure: a pilot study

Aim: The STARR (Stapled Trans-Anal Rectal Resection) procedure consists of a surgical correction of symptomatic rectocele refractory to medical treatment, involving anal dilatation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of the STARR procedure on anal distensibility using EndoFLIP® device.Methods: All female patients with a minimal rectocele of 3 cm and with symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) refractory to medical treatment were included prospectively. Patients with previous anal incontinence were not included. Wexner, ODS and Kess scores were recorded. Endoanal ultrasounds and EndoFLIP® measurements were performed pre-surgery and 3 months following the STARR procedure. The distensibility index (DI) at 40 mL of inflation at rest was the primary study endpoint.Results: Seven patients (median age: 52.5, range: 44–62) were included between 2014 and 2017. The DI after surgery was the same as the pre-surgery DI. No patient developed symptoms of faecal incontinence or urge to defecate in the three months following the STARR procedure. All patients reported an improvement in their ODS and Kess scores three months after the STARR procedure. No anal sphincter defects were detected by endoanal ultrasound.Conclusion: Anal dilatation did not appear to alter anal distensibility in patients with a normal anal function before the STARR procedure.

Laparoscopic pelvic organ suspension with mesh: a modified technique and primary results

BackgroundPelvic organ prolapse recurrence rate is an important issue which impacts the patient's quality of life and results in a new surgical procedure. We use a new technique of laparoscopic pelvic organ suspension (rectal suspension) for pelvic organ prolapse treatment in our center. We evaluated the results of this technique, three months after surgery and at the time of study reporting. MethodsAll patients with pelvic organ prolapse for whom laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse had been done were evaluated. Data were collected from the patient's charts and their short term follow up 3 months after the surgery and their last follow up visit. Demographic, history, physical examination, Wexner's fecal incontinence score and Altomare's Obstructed Defecation Syndrome score, post-operation complications and patient's satisfaction were analyzed, retrospectively. ResultsAll patients were female with a mean age of 57±11.43 years (range 32–86 years). Mean BMI was 26.1±3.73. Nine patients had rectal bleeding (31%), 18 had prolonged or difficult defecation (62%), 16 had rectal prolapse (55.2%), 11 had gas incontinence (37.9%), 9 had liquid stool incontinence (31%), 5 had stool incontinence (17.2%), 9 had vaginal prolapse (31%), 23 had constipation (79.3%), 9 complaint of pelvic pain (31%), 9 had urge or stress urinary incontinence (31%) and 13 had dyspareunia (44.8%). ConclusionsIn conclusion, we believe this procedure has good results in short term follow up (3 months after surgery), but a high recurrence rate in the middle term follow up. Therefore, this procedure is no longer recommended.