Obstetric Clinicians Research Articles

Experiences of Midwestern obstetric clinicians during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

BackgroundThe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to healthcare system changes aimed at minimizing disease transmission that impacted experiences with obstetric healthcare. ObjectiveTo explore experiences of clinicians providing obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Study DesignQualitative, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with five nurse practitioners and 16 obstetrical physicians providing a mix of outpatient and inpatient obstetric care during the COVID-19 pandemic in a mid-sized, Midwestern city in the United States. Interviews elucidated challenges and facilitators of obstetric care provision and vaccination of pregnant patients against COVID-19 during the pandemic. Transcripts were coded inductively then deductively using the Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF), which integrates a disparities framework and implementation framework to highlight multilevel factors that influence obstetric care. Thematic analysis was conducted, and thematic saturation was reached. ResultsWe interviewed 21 clinicians. Clinicians recounted personal challenges such as social isolation and burnout that could be countered by social support. Challenges within the clinical encounter included implementation of infection mitigation efforts, vaccine counseling, and limitations of telehealth. However, when successfully implemented, telehealth facilitated care and circumvented barriers. Clinicians cited challenges at the healthcare system level such as rapidly evolving knowledge and recommendations, restrictive visitor policies, personnel shortage, and inadequate institutional resources to support pandemic-related stressors. However, interdisciplinary care and guidelines available for clinicians facilitated care. Clinicians reported that challenges at the societal level included financial strain, lack of childcare, medical mistrust, politicization of medicine, misinformation, and racism. Societal-level facilitators included insurance access, community outreach, positive policy changes, and fostering trust in medicine. ConclusionThe pandemic produced unique stressors and exacerbated existing challenges for clinicians providing obstetric care. Applying the HEIF to the findings emphasizes the influence of societal factors on all other levels. Identified facilitators can inform interventions to address stressors in obstetric care that have resulted from the changed sociopolitical landscape of the pandemic.

Clinician care priorities and practices in the fourth trimester: perspective from a California survey

BackgroundProfessional societies such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) promote the idea that postpartum care is an ongoing process where there is adequate opportunity to provide services and support. Nonetheless, in practice, the guidelines ask clinicians to perform more clinical responsibilities than they might be able to do with limited time and resources.MethodsWe conducted an online survey among practicing obstetric clinicians (obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), midwives, and family medicine doctors) in California about their priorities and care practices for the first postpartum visit and explored how they prioritize multiple clinical responsibilities within existing time and resources. Between September 2023 and February 2024, 174 out of 229 eligible participants completed the survey, a 76% response rate. From a list of care components, we used descriptive statistics to identify those that were highly prioritized by most clinicians and those that were considered a priority by very few and examined the alignment between prioritized components and recommended care practices.ResultsClinicians were highly invested in the care components that they rated as most important, indicating that they always check these components or assess them when they perceive patient need. Depression and anxiety, breast health/breast feeding issues, vaginal birth complications and family planning counseling were highly ranked components by all clinicians. In contrast, clinicians more often did not assess those care components that infrequently ranked highly among the priority listing, consisting mainly of social drivers of health such as screening and counseling for intimate partner violence, working conditions and food/housing insecurity. In both instances, we found little discordance between priorities and care practices. However, OB/GYNs and midwives differed in some care components that they prioritized highly.ConclusionsWhile there is growing understanding of how important professional society recommendations are for maternal-infant health, clinicians face barriers completing all recommendations, especially those components related to social drivers of health. However, what the clinicians do prioritize highly, they are likely to perform. Now that Medi-Cal (Medicaid) insurance is available in California for up to 12 months postpartum, there is a need to understand what care clinicians provide and what gaps remain.

Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Diabetes Management During Pregnancy: Evidence, Practical Tips, and Common Pitfalls.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has the potential to revolutionize diabetes management during pregnancy by providing detailed and real-time data to patients and clinicians, overcoming many of the limitations of self-monitoring of blood glucose. Although there are limited data on the role of CGM to improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes or gestational diabetes, CGM has been shown to reduce pregnancy complications in patients with type 1 diabetes. Despite the limited data in some populations, given its ease of use and recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval with expanding insurance coverage, CGM has gained widespread popularity among pregnant patients with all types of diabetes. It is critical for obstetric clinicians to understand how CGM can be successfully integrated into clinical practice. We present a practical, step-wise approach to CGM data interpretation that can be incorporated into diabetes management during pregnancy and common CGM pitfalls and solutions. Although technology will continue to advance with newer-generation CGM devices and diabetes technology such as automated insulin delivery (not covered here), these key principles form a basic foundation for understanding CGM technology and its utility for pregnant people.

Assessing Patient's Feelings About Their Pregnancy: A Preliminary Qualitative Exploration of Conversations Between Obstetric Clinicians and Pregnant Patients at the First Prenatal Visit [ID 2683659

INTRODUCTION: During the first prenatal visit, some patients may feel overwhelmed, ambivalent, or undecided about continuing the pregnancy. Understanding a patient’s feelings about the pregnancy can allow obstetric clinicians to offer support, resources, and options. Few studies have empirically examined how obstetric providers assess patient’s feelings about their pregnancy. METHODS: We analyzed transcripts of audio-recorded patient–obstetric clinician first obstetric visits for discussions exploring the patient’s feelings, intentions, or desires regarding their pregnancy. These discussions were then coded for content and communication approach. RESULTS: We coded 100 transcribed visits. Discussions about pregnancy intent, desire, or feelings occurred in 70 visits. In 11 visits, the clinician used an open-ended neutral question (eg, “how are you feeling about this pregnancy?”). Fifteen clinicians expressed assumptions about the patient’s feelings regarding the pregnancy (eg, “congratulations!”). Fifty-seven clinicians specifically asked about intendedness (eg, “Was this a planned pregnancy?). Twenty-one addressed the topic with leading statements (eg, “but you want to keep the baby, right?”). Of the 53 patients that admitted to an unplanned pregnancy, only 42 (79%) of these conversations were further explored—29 (54%) specifically only asked about patient’s desire to continue the pregnancy; 13 (24%) provided additional options counseling, information, or support. CONCLUSION: Few obstetric clinicians explored the feelings and desires about the pregnancy during first obstetric visits. Further work is needed to explore improved methods of addressing how patients feel about their pregnancy.

Obstetrician views on Fetal Pillow® device use and research in Aotearoa New Zealand: A cross-sectional survey.

There is anecdotal evidence of Fetal Pillow® use, but no formal local information on clinician practices and perspectives. To assess obstetrician use of the Fetal Pillow®, knowledge of relevant research, and interest in a proposed randomised controlled trial in Aotearoa New Zealand. Anonymous cross-sectional survey of practising obstetricians and obstetric trainees in Aotearoa New Zealand distributed by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Of 136 respondents (69% specialists and 31% trainees), 130 had heard of the Fetal Pillow® device, and 108 had used it at least once (43% more than ten times). The device was available in 17/21 units represented. The 108 users of the device reported this was most commonly on collegial advice (63%) or after personal experience of a difficult delivery (33%) and most (80%) believed it reduced maternal morbidity. Only around one-third of the 130 respondents who had heard of the device agreed there was adequate research demonstrating its efficacy for maternal (36%) and neonatal (30%) morbidity. The majority reported they would change practice in response to a randomised trial, although they were more likely to start use (81% of current non-users) than stop (53% of users). Most (70%) respondents agreed they would encourage patients to participate in a randomised trial. The Fetal Pillow® is available in most maternity units in Aotearoa New Zealand. The majority of obstetric clinicians believe it reduces maternal morbidity, while acknowledging the lack of scientific evidence. Most would support a randomised trial.

Neurologic Emergencies in Pregnancy.

Neurologic emergencies in pregnancy require prompt evaluation and early, focused intervention to improve neurologic outcomes for the affected person and to avoid further injury. Neurologic events in pregnancy, although rare, present a time of extreme risk of permanent injury for the person who is pregnant. Therefore, obstetric clinicians should be well versed in the risk factors for potential neurologic events and understand the symptoms and events that should prompt evaluation for a neurologic event. In addition, they should support other specialties in aggressive and early neurologic care for the patient to improve outcomes while assessing fetal well-being and care optimization for the dyad. Obstetric clinicians can uniquely provide knowledge of changes in pregnancy physiology that can increase the risk of neurologic events, as well as change the treatment of these events. For all patients with neurologic events, "time is brain." Therefore, it is important to be aware of changes in common presenting pregnancy concerns that should prompt evaluation for other pathogeneses. Finally, pregnancy care teams should be prepared to begin the initial stabilization and management of acute neurologic emergencies, including seizure, stroke, and meningitis, while seeking aid from other medical and neurologic specialists who can support their care and interventions. Early and aggressive interventions for individuals with neurologic events during pregnancy and postpartum are critical to the overall well-being of the dyad.

Uterine Sacculation With Entrapped Placenta After Delivery.

Uterine sacculation refers to a temporary pouch or sac within the uterus that may contain the placenta or fetal parts and that may be diagnosed antepartum or after delivery. There is very limited published information about this rare condition and its management. We report two cases of uterine sacculation with entrapped placenta diagnosed immediately postpartum, managed with two different approaches. In one case, the patient underwent immediate laparotomy and placental extraction. In the second case, the patient was managed conservatively but ultimately developed signs of infection and underwent laparotomy. Uterine sacculation with entrapped placenta is a rare condition that is a potential etiology of retained placenta. Obstetric clinicians should be aware of this diagnosis and the management strategies available.

Improving obstetric and perinatal outcomes with a remote patient monitoring program for hypertension in a large integrated care system

ObjectiveTo determine the effect of a remote patient monitoring program for hypertension (RPM HTN) in patients diagnosed with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Study DesignWe used a matched retrospective cohort design to evaluate differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes using data from electronic medical records. Patients enrolled in RPM HTN between November 1, 2019, and October 31, 2021, who delivered a pregnancy at ≥20 weeks gestation were compared to a cohort of patients matched by age, race, HTN and diabetes status, who delivered in the 48-month period before implementation of RPM HTN. Results1030 patients were enrolled in RPM HTN and 937 were matched to historical controls. Five hundred and seventeen (50.2 %) were enrolled in the antepartum period and 513 (49.8 %) were enrolled postpartum. Patients in the RPM HTN cohort were more likely to have a post-hospital discharge blood pressure (BP) measured within the first 20 days after delivery (RR 1.56, 95 % CI: 1.47–1.65: p < 0.01) and were more likely to have that BP be normal (RR 1.43, 95 % CI: 1.31–1.55: p = 0.05). They were also more likely to be taking antihypertensives postpartum (RR 1.27, 95 % CI: 1.15–1.40; p < 0.01) and to be evaluated by an obstetric clinician within 20 days of delivery (RR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.42–1.58; p < 0.01). ConclusionsA remote HTN monitoring program for 937 obstetric patients was associated with improved BP monitoring, better postpartum BP control, and improved linkages to clinician care after delivery, when compared to historical controls.

Readiness to Implement a Doula–Hospital Partnership Program

ObjectiveTo assess obstetric clinicians’ and leaders’ baseline knowledge, attitudes, and experience with doulas and their readiness to implement a novel doula–hospital partnership program. DesignSurvey of obstetric clinicians and leaders before implementation of the doula program. Setting/Local ProblemAcademic medical center in Western Massachusetts that was preparing to pilot a doula–hospital partnership program with Black doulas for Black women to address racial disparities in maternal morbidity and mortality. ParticipantsObstetric clinicians and leaders (N = 48). Intervention/MeasurementsWe used established questions from the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) scale and original questions to assess participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with doulas and their readiness to implement the planned doula program. We distributed the questionnaire to 103 potential respondents. We conducted descriptive and bivariate analyses and analyzed open-ended responses using content analysis. ResultsForty-eight participants responded to the survey. Of those who provided intrapartum care (n = 45), all were familiar with doula roles. Respondents who reported having experience working with a doula, 47.3% (n = 18/38) had at least one prior negative experience with a doula and 76.3% (n = 29/38) reported positive experiences with doulas. However, there was a mean score of 12.62 on the attitude toward doulas (scale range: 3-15). The mean score on the ORIC change commitment subscale was 20.65 (range: 15-25) and on the ORIC change efficacy subscale, mean score was 29.31 (range: 19-35). Results did not differ by participants characteristics. ConclusionOur findings suggested strong support for and readiness to implement the doula–hospital partnership program.

Perinatal Psychopharmacology: Innovative Approaches to Care Delivery.

Perinatal mental health conditions are the most common complications of childbirth and have well-established enduring negative effects. Obstetric (Ob) clinicians care for patients with perinatal mental health conditions across a spectrum of acuity, severity, and complexity. Ob and psychiatric clinicians can collaborate to create a cohesive continuum of psychopharmacologic care for perinatal patients. This chapter provides an overall framework for Ob-psychiatric clinician collaboration with examples of innovation in care delivery.

Redesigning the First Prenatal Visit: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

In an era of rising maternal mortality, a thorough first prenatal visit is essential; however, in our clinic we confirmed that many important topics were not being addressed. To rectify this problem, we redesigned the first prenatal visit to improve the coverage of topics, collect social determinants of health, increase patient access, and maintain patient satisfaction. We designed a quality improvement project to improve the first prenatal visit in a faculty obstetrics and gynecology clinic. To assess effectiveness, data before and after the implementation were compared. The intervention divided the first prenatal visit into two patient encounters: a nurse-led telemedicine visit and an in-person visit with an obstetric clinician. The median percentage of topics covered in the first prenatal visit increased from 70.0% to 95.6%, and improvements were observed for all key themes ( p < .001). Social determinants of health was routinely collected postintervention (98.8%). A reduction in no-shows (9.9%-4.2%) improved patient access for all patients. Patient satisfaction for the first prenatal visit remained unchanged ( p = .370). Significant improvements in addressing important topics at the first prenatal visit are achievable by separating one prenatal visit into two visits while increasing patient access and maintaining high patient satisfaction.

The ARRIVE Trial.

Timing of delivery such that maternal and perinatal outcomes are optimized is among the most important and commonplace decisions in obstetric care. Given the importance of this determination, it is somewhat surprising that there has been, until relatively recently, little in the way of high-quality evidence to guide obstetric clinicians in this decision. This chapter describes the evolution of studies examining the effects of labor induction and the importance of the ARRIVE trial in that context.

Postpartum Extended-Release Buprenorphine Tissue Necrosis.

Extended-release buprenorphine (XRB) may improve medication for opioid use disorder continuation among postpartum individuals. However, obstetric clinicians have relatively little experience with XRB. We describe two cases of XRB-related tissue necrosis in postpartum individuals to highlight recommended injection technique and management strategies for this rare complication. One patient developed tissue necrosis after her initial injection. Her wound was expectantly managed. Another patient on long-term XRB developed tissue necrosis within 1 day of injection. General surgery excised the depot. Both instances were attributed to injection of XRB intradermally rather than subcutaneously. Both patients continued monthly XRB without recurrence, suggesting that this complication is not an allergy. Clinicians should be able to prevent, recognize, and manage tissue necrosis, a rare complication of XRB injection.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of the Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator: A Multicenter Survey Study.

Prior studies demonstrated the neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator's potential in drastically reducing antibiotic prescriptions, and its international adoption is increasing rapidly. To optimize the EOS calculator's impact, successful implementation is crucial. This study aimed to identify key barriers and facilitators to inform an implementation strategy. A multicenter cross-sectional survey was carried out among physicians, residents, nurses and clinical obstetricians of thirteen Dutch hospitals. Survey development was prepared through a literature search and stakeholder interviews. Data collection and analysis were based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). A total of 465 stakeholders completed the survey. The main barriers concerned the expectance of the department's capacity problems and the issues with maternal information transfer between departments. Facilitators concerned multiple relative advantages of the EOS calculator, including stakeholder education, EOS calculator integration in the electronic health record and existing positive expectations about the safety and effectivity of the calculator. Based on these findings, tailored implementation interventions can be developed, such as identifying early adopters and champions, conducting educational meetings tailored to the target group, creating ready-to-use educational materials, integrating the EOS calculator into electronic health records, creating a culture of collective responsibility among departments and collecting data to evaluate implementation success and innovation results.

Developing a multimodal maternal infant perinatal outpatient delivery system: the MOMI PODS program.

Progress in maternal child health has been hampered by poor rates of outpatient follow up for postpartum individuals. Primary care after delivery can effectively detect and treat several pregnancy-related complications and comorbidities, but postpartum linkage to primary care remains low. In this manuscript, we share the experience of implementing a novel mother-infant dyad program, the Multimodal Maternal Infant Perinatal Outpatient Delivery System (MOMI PODS), to improve primary care linkage and community resource access postpartum via integration into pediatric care structures. With a focus on providing care for people who are publicly insured, we designed a program to mitigate maternal morbidity risk factors in postpartum individuals with chronic disease or pregnancy complications. We discuss the systematic process of designing, executing, and evaluating a collaborative clinical program with involvement of internal medicine/pediatric, family medicine, and obstetric clinicians via establishing stakeholders, identifying best practices, drawing from the evidence base, designing training and promotional materials, training partners and providers, and evaluating clinic enrollment. We share the challenges encountered such as in achieving sufficient provider capacity, consistent provision of care, scheduling, and data tracking, as well as mitigation strategies to overcome these barriers. Overall, MOMI PODS is an innovative approach that integrates outpatient postpartum care into traditional pediatric structures to increase access, showing significant promise to improve healthcare utilization and promote postpartum health.

Access to Prenatal Care Among Patients With Opioid Use Disorder in Florida: Findings From a Secret Shopper Study.

To evaluate access to prenatal care for pregnant patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) under Medicaid coverage in Florida. A cross-sectional, secret shopper study was conducted in which calls were made to randomly selected obstetric clinicians' offices in Florida. Callers posed as a 14-week-pregnant patient with Medicaid insurance who was receiving MOUD from another physician and requested to schedule a first-time prenatal care appointment. Descriptive statistics were used to report our primary outcome, the callers' success in obtaining appointments from Medicaid-enrolled physicians' offices. Wait time for appointments and reasons the physician offices refused appointments to callers were collected. Overall, 2,816 obstetric clinicians are enrolled in Florida Medicaid. Callers made 1,747 attempts to contact 1,023 randomly selected physicians' offices from June to September 2021. Only 48.9% of medical offices (n=500) were successfully reached by phone, of which 39.4% (n=197) offered a prenatal care appointment to the caller. The median wait time until the first appointment was 15 days (quartile 1: 7; quartile 3: 26), with a range of 0-55 days. However, despite offering an appointment, 8.6% of the medical offices stated that they do not accept Medicaid insurance payment or would accept only self-pay. Among the 60.6% of callers unable to secure an appointment, the most common reasons were that the clinician was not accepting patients taking methadone (34.7%) or was not accepting any new patients with Medicaid insurance (23.8%) and that the pregnancy would be too advanced by the time of the first available appointment (7.3%). This secret shopper study found that the majority of obstetric clinicians' offices enrolled in Florida Medicaid do not accept pregnant patients with Medicaid insurance who are taking MOUD. Policy changes are needed to ensure access to adequate prenatal care for patients with opioid use disorder.

Umbilical cord cysts: Classification, diagnosis, prognosis, and pregnancy recommendations.

Umbilical cord cysts (UCCs)-cysts located in the umbilical cord that are derived from an abnormal embryonic development process-are typically an incidental discovery during prenatal ultrasound. It can be described as either a pseudocyst or a true UCC, which results from focal edema or degeneration of Wharton jelly or the remnants of embryonic development, respectively. Due to the relative rarity of the UCC, the clinical guidance of UCCs is not yet available. Herein, the aim of this paper is to discuss the classification, diagnosis, prognosis, and clinical management of UCCs through a literature review, in order to improve the understanding of UCCs among clinical obstetricians and pediatricians.

Understanding and Overcoming Barriers to Rural Obstetric Training for Family Physicians.

Family physicians are the most common health professional providing rural obstetric (OB) care, but the number of family physicians practicing OB is declining. To address rural/urban disparities in parental and child health, family medicine must provide robust OB training to prepare family physicians to care for parent-newborn dyads in rural communities. This mixed-methods study aimed to inform policy and practice solutions. We surveyed 115 rural family medicine residency programs (program directors, coordinators, or faculty) and conducted semistructured interviews with personnel from 10 rural family medicine residencies. We calculated descriptive statistics and frequencies for survey responses. Two authors conducted a directed content analysis of qualitative survey and interview responses. The survey yielded 59 responses (51.3%); responders and nonresponders were not significantly different by geography or program type. Most programs (85.5%) trained residents to provide comprehensive prenatal and postpartum care. Continuity clinic sites were predominantly rural across all years and OB training was largely rural in postgraduate year 2 (PGY2) and PGY3. Almost half of programs listed "competition with other OB providers" (49.1%) and "shortage of family medicine faculty providing OB care" (47.3%) as major challenges. Individual programs tended to report either few challenges or multiple challenges. In qualitative responses, common themes included the importance of faculty interest and skill, community and hospital support, volume, and relationships. To improve rural OB training, our findings support prioritizing relationships between family medicine and other OB clinicians, sustaining family medicine OB faculty, and developing creative solutions to interrupt cascading and interrelated challenges.

Graduate Medical Education’s Role in the Battle for Evidence-Based Care

Graduate Medical Education’s Role in the Battle for Evidence-Based Care

Addressing Adverse Childhood and Adult Experiences During Prenatal Care.

Adverse childhood and adult experiences can affect health outcomes throughout life and across generations. The perinatal period offers a critical opportunity for obstetric clinicians to partner with patients to provide support and improve outcomes. This article draws on stakeholder input, expert opinion, and available evidence to provide recommendations for obstetric clinicians' inquiry about and response to pregnant patients' past and present adversity and trauma during prenatal care encounters. Trauma-informed care is a universal intervention that can proactively address adversity and trauma and support healing, even if a patient does not explicitly disclose past or present adversity. Inquiry about past and present adversity and trauma provides an avenue to offer support and to create individualized care plans. Preparatory steps to adopting a trauma-informed approach to prenatal care include initiating education and training for practice staff, prioritizing addressing racism and health disparities, and establishing patient safety and trust. Inquiry about adversity and trauma, as well as resilience factors, can be implemented gradually over time through open-ended questions, structured survey measures, or a combination of both techniques. A range of evidence-based educational resources, prevention and intervention programs, and community-based initiatives can be included within individualized care plans to improve perinatal health outcomes. These practices will be further developed and improved by increased clinical training and research, as well as through broad adoption of a trauma-informed approach and collaboration across specialty areas.