Obsessive-compulsive Disorder Treatment Study Research Articles

Age differences in children with obsessive-compulsive disorder: symptoms, comorbidity, severity and impairment

Background Studies on child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) indicate that symptom severity is similar across age, but significant age differences of symptom profile and comorbid disorders have been observed. These earlier studies have yielded mixed results, are methodologically heterogenous and tend to have fairly small sample sizes. The current study examines these differences in one of the largest samples to date and the first sample outside of an English-speaking cultural context. Methods We compared children aged 11 years and younger to adolescents aged 12 years and older from the Nordic Long-Term Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study that included 269 children and adolescents with a primary diagnosis of OCD. The two groups were compared on measures of OCD severity, symptom profile, comorbid symptoms, and functional impairment. Results Results showed that the younger group had a poorer level of insight, higher rates of ADHD, and disruptive disorders. The older group had higher levels of mental compulsions, miscellaneous obsessions and compulsions, and self-rated functional impairment. No differences were found on the prevalence of anxiety, tic or depressive disorders between the age groups, nor on overall OCD severity. Conclusion Overall, differences between the age groups were found to be less than in previous research. Defining groups by age of onset and duration of illness rather than age at evaluation did not change results. Mental health services in Scandinavia are free of cost, making early intervention more accessible, which may reduce subsequent secondary problems and explain these findings.

Health anxiety symptoms in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: patient characteristics and effect on treatment outcome.

The aim was to explore the potential clinical role of health anxiety (HA) symptoms in children and adolescents diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The study investigated differences in demographic and various clinical variables between young people with OCD, with and without HA symptoms, and the effect of HA symptoms on overall OCD treatment outcome. The study sample comprised 269 children and adolescents with OCD (aged 7-17years) from the large Nordic Long-term OCD Treatment Study. OCD symptoms and severity were assessed with The Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (CY-BOCS), which includes one item regarding HA-like obsessions and one item regarding HA-like compulsions that were used to define the HA group. Several other instruments were used to assess comorbidity and other clinical aspects. All participants were treated with 14 weekly protocolled sessions of exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). HA symptoms were present in 31% of participants. Other anxiety symptoms and comorbid anxiety disorders were more prevalent among those with HA symptoms. These patients also presented with significantly more types of OCD symptoms. HA symptoms were reduced following OCD treatment with CBT and having HA symptoms did not affect CBT outcome. Results suggest that pediatric OCD with HA symptoms is characterized by more anxiety symptoms and a more heterogeneous OCD symptom profile. Standardized CBT seems equally effective in treating child and adolescent OCD with or without HA symptoms.Clinical trials registration: Nordic Long-term Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study: www.controlled-trials.com ; ISRCTN66385119.

Younger versus older children with obsessive-compulsive disorder: Symptoms, severity and impairment

Studies on child and adolescent obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) indicate that symptom severity is similar across age, but significant age differences of symptom profile and comorbid disorders have been observed. The current study examines these differences in one of the largest samples to date, and the first sample outside of an English-speaking cultural context. We compared children aged 11 years and younger to adolescents aged 12 years and older from the Nordic Long-Term Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study that included 269 children and adolescents with a primary diagnosis of OCD. The two groups were compared on measures of OCD severity, symptom profile, comorbid symptoms, and functional impairment. Results showed that the younger group had a poorer level of insight, higher rates of ADHD, and disruptive disorders. The older group had higher levels of mental compulsions, miscellaneous obsessions and compulsions, and self-rated functional impairment. No differences were found on the prevalence of anxiety, tic or depressive disorders between the age groups, nor on overall OCD severity. Overall, differences between the age groups were found to be less than in previous research. Defining groups by age of onset and duration of illness rather than age at evaluation did not change results.

Hoarding in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: prevalence, clinical correlates, and cognitive behavioral therapy outcome.

Hoarding, common in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), has specific clinical correlates and is associated with poor prognosis. However, there are few studies of hoarding in pediatric OCD. This study estimates the occurrence of hoarding symptoms in a sample of children and adolescents with OCD, investigating possible differences in demographic and clinical variables between pediatric OCD with and without hoarding symptoms. Furthermore, the study investigates whether hoarding symptoms predict poorer treatment outcomes after cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). The study sample comprised 269 children and adolescents with OCD, aged 7-17years, from Denmark, Sweden, and Norway, who were all included in the Nordic long-term obsessive-compulsive disorder Treatment Study. All had an OCD diagnosis according to the DSM-IV and were treated with 14 weekly sessions of manualized, exposure-based CBT. Hoarding symptoms and OCD severity were assessed with the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale and group differences in treatment outcome were analyzed using linear mixed-effect modelling. Seventy-two patients (26.8%) had one or more symptoms of hoarding. Comorbid tic disorders (p = 0.005) and indecision (p = 0.024) were more prevalent among those with hoarding symptoms than those without hoarding symptoms. In addition, youth with hoarding symptoms had a different OCD symptom profile. Having symptoms of hoarding did not affect CBT outcome (p = 0.933). Results from the study suggest that CBT is equally effective for those with and without hoarding-related OCD.

Secondary outcomes from the pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder treatment study II

The Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study II (POTS II) investigated the benefit of serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) augmentation with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Primary outcomes focused on OCD symptom change and indicated benefit associated with a full course of CBT. Given that the majority of youth with OCD suffer from significant comorbid symptoms and impaired quality of life, the current study examined POTS II data for effects on secondary outcomes. Participants were 124 youth ages 7–17 years with a primary diagnosis of OCD who were partial responders to an adequate SRI trial. Participants were randomized to medication management, medication management plus instructions in cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), or medication management plus full CBT. Acute effects on non-OCD anxiety, depression, inattention, hyperactivity, and quality of life were examined across treatment conditions. Improvement across treatment was observed for non-OCD anxiety, inattention, hyperactivity, and quality of life. Changes were generally significantly greater in the group receiving full CBT. Child-rated depression was not found to change. OCD-focused treatment lead to improvement in other areas of psychopathology and functioning. For youth who are partial responders to SRI monotherapy, augmentation with full CBT may yield the greatest benefit on these secondary outcomes. Clinical trials registrationTreatment of Pediatric OCD for SRI Partial Responders, Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00074815, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00074815.

Elevated Autism Spectrum Disorder Traits in Young Children with OCD.

Studies have shown a high prevalence of autistic spectrum traits in both children and adults with psychiatric disorders; however the prevalence rate has not yet been investigated in young children with OCD. The aim of the current study was to (1) determine whether ASD traits indicated by the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) and the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) were elevated in young children with OCD who do not have a specific ASD diagnosis and (2) determine if ASD traits were associated with OCD severity. Participants (N=127) were children ages 5-8years enrolled in the pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment study for young children (POTS Jr.). Results indicated that the SRS showed elevated autistic traits in the sample and was associated with OCD severity whereas the SCQ did not indicate heightened ASD symptoms. Implications of these results are discussed.

Family-based treatment of early childhood obsessive-compulsive disorder: the Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study for Young Children (POTS Jr)--a randomized clinical trial.

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been established as efficacious for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) among older children and adolescents, yet its effect on young children has not been evaluated sufficiently. To examine the relative efficacy of family-based CBT (FB-CBT) involving exposure plus response prevention vs an FB relaxation treatment (FB-RT) control condition for children 5 to 8 years of age. A 14-week randomized clinical trial (Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study for Young Children [POTS Jr]) conducted at 3 academic medical centers between 2006 and 2011, involving 127 pediatric outpatients 5 to 8 years of age who received a primary diagnosis of OCD and a Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score of 16 or higher. Participants were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of (1) FB-CBT, including exposure plus response prevention, or (2) FB-RT. Responder status defined as an independent evaluator-rated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) and change in independent evaluator-rated continuous Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale total score. RESULTS Family-based CBT was superior to FB-RT on both primary outcome measures. The percentages of children who were rated as 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale at 14 weeks were 72% for FB-CBT and 41% for FB-RT. The effect size difference between FB-CBT and FB-RT on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale was 0.31 (95% CI, 0.17-0.45). The number needed to treat (NNT) with FB-CBT vs FB-RT was estimated as 3.2 (95% CI, 2.2-5.8). The effect size difference between FB-CBT and FB-RT on the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale at week 14 was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.62-1.06). A comprehensive FB-CBT program was superior to a relaxation program with a similar format in reducing OCD symptoms and functional impairment in young children (5-8 years of age) with OCD. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00533806.

The pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder treatment study for young children (POTS Jr): Developmental considerations in the rationale, design, and methods

This paper presents the rationale, design, and methods of the pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder treatment study for young children (POTS Jr). The study is a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) of family-based cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) vs. family-based relaxation therapy for young children (ages 5–8) with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), which examines the effect of treatment on symptom reduction, functional impairment, and quality of life. Secondary aims evaluate: potential moderators and mediators of treatment response, differences in time course of response, retention rates, and maintenance of treatment gains over one year post-treatment. The sample included 127 children (53% female) and their parents. With regard to ethnicity, 89% of the sample described themselves as non-Hispanic, 5% Hispanic/Latino, and 6% did not endorse a category. In terms of race, the sample was predominantly (91%) white. Because the rationale and methods of the multi-site RCT have been well established, we emphasize here the methodological aspects of the study that were tailored to meet the developmental needs of young children with OCD. Aspects that are highlighted include: choice of control group, inclusion/exclusion criteria, assessment/measurement issues, treatment adaptations, training, and recruitment.

Predictors of Parental Accommodation in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings from the Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study (POTS) Trial

Few studies have examined predictors of parental accommodation (assessed with the Family Accommodation Scale-Parent Report) among families of children with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). No studies have examined this phenomenon using empirically derived subscales of the Family Accommodation Scale-Parent Report (i.e., Caregiver Involvement, Avoidance of Triggers). Ninety-six youths (and their families) were included in the present study. Parents were asked to complete the Family Accommodation Scale-Parent Report. Families also completed several additional measurements assessing child- and parent-level variables of interest. Regression analyses were used to examine potential predictors of accommodation. Results support prior research suggesting that accommodation is ubiquitous among the families of children with OCD. Analyses revealed that several child-level (i.e., compulsion severity, oppositional behavior, and frequency of washing symptoms) and one parent-level (i.e., symptoms of anxiety) predictors work jointly to provide significant predictive models of parental accommodation. Clinicians and researchers should be aware of the impact of specific child- and parent-level variables on family accommodation in pediatric OCD and in turn their implications for treatment compliance, adherence, and, by extension, outcome. Study limitations warrant replication and extension of these findings; in particular, researchers may seek to obtain a better understanding of how the various facets of parental accommodation may differentially affect treatment.

CBT Goes Home to Benefit Children With OCD

“Phone home” may be just one alternative to providing cognitive-behavioral therapy to children with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study II: rationale, design and methods.

This paper presents the rationale, design, and methods of the Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study II (POTS II), which investigates two different cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) augmentation approaches in children and adolescents who have experienced a partial response to pharmacotherapy with a serotonin reuptake inhibitor for OCD. The two CBT approaches test a "single doctor" versus "dual doctor" model of service delivery. A specific goal was to develop and test an easily disseminated protocol whereby child psychiatrists would provide instructions in core CBT procedures recommended for pediatric OCD (e.g., hierarchy development, in vivo exposure homework) during routine medical management of OCD (I-CBT). The conventional "dual doctor" CBT protocol consists of 14 visits over 12 weeks involving: (1) psychoeducation, (2), cognitive training, (3) mapping OCD, and (4) exposure with response prevention (EX/RP). I-CBT is a 7-session version of CBT that does not include imaginal exposure or therapist-assisted EX/RP. In this study, we compared 12 weeks of medication management (MM) provided by a study psychiatrist (MM only) with two types of CBT augmentation: (1) the dual doctor model (MM+CBT); and (2) the single doctor model (MM+I-CBT). The design balanced elements of an efficacy study (e.g., random assignment, independent ratings) with effectiveness research aims (e.g., differences in specific SRI medications, dosages, treatment providers). The study is wrapping up recruitment of 140 youth ages 7–17 with a primary diagnosis of OCD. Independent evaluators (IEs) rated participants at weeks 0,4,8, and 12 during acute treatment and at 3,6, and 12 month follow-up visits.NCT00074815

The Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Treatment Study: Rationale, Design, and Methods

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), which has a prevalence of 1 in 200 in children and adolescents, carries with it significant functional morbidity. A growing empirical literature supports the efficacy of short-term treatment with OCD-specific cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) or medication management with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. These and other studies also identify a substantial probability of partial response and, possibly, differences in durability when treatment is discontinued between medication and CBT. The Pediatric OCD Treatment Study is a multicenter, randomized, masked clinical trial designed to evaluate the relative benefit and durability of four treatments for children and adolescents with OCD: sertraline, CBT, combination of sertraline and CBT, and pill placebo. Stage 1 (12 weeks) is a balanced randomized comparison of these four treatments. Responders at the end of stage 1 advance to 4 months of open follow-up in their assigned arm during which all treatment is discontinued. At the end of stage 2 (if not before), nonresponders to any treatment at the end of stage 1, any patient relapsing in stage 2, and all stage 1 placebo patients receive open treatment that is tailored to the patient's needs. A volunteer sample of 120 subjects between the ages of 7 and 17 inclusive with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (fourth edition) diagnosis of OCD enters the study. All patients, regardless of responder status, return for all scheduled assessments. This report describes the design of the trial, the rationale for the design choices made, and the methods used to carry out the trial.