Objective Signs Of Inflammation Research Articles

Model-Informed Drug Development-Based Approval of Intravenous Secukinumab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis, Active Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Active Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.

On October 6, 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved an intravenous (IV) formulation and dosage of Cosentyx® (secukinumab), for the treatment of adult patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), active ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) with objective signs of inflammation. Clinical pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and short-term placebo-controlled safety data were available from clinical studies (NCT04156620 and NCT04209205) with the to-be-marketed IV formulation using a maintenance dosage 3 mg/kg every 4 weeks (q4w), which was different from the dose approved (1.75 mg/kg q4w). The IV dosage of 3 mg/kg utilized in these two trials resulted in exposures (Cmax,ss) significantly higher than those for the approved subcutaneous (SC) regimens. Further, there is limited long-term safety information available for this 3 mg/kg q4w IV dose. To address this important limitation, a model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was employed to leverage available clinical PK, efficacy, and safety data from the secukinumab development program to identify a maintenance IV dosing regimen, 1.75 mg/kg IV q4w, that better approximated the relevant SC secukinumab exposures for which efficacy and safety have been established. The MIDD analyses were used to support approval of this IV dosing regimen not directly studied in the indications sought for licensure, PsA, AS, and nr-AxSpA.

Difficult-to-Treat Axial Spondyloarthritis: A New Challenge.

Axial spondyloarthritis is a common form of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease in adults, the treatment of which is based on non-pharmacological elements on the one hand, and pharmacological options on the other, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the first line, followed by biological or targeted synthetic treatments. The therapeutic objective is remission or a low level of disease activity; if this objective is not achieved, the treatment is rotated or changed. Multiple changes is one factor illustrating the inability to achieve disease control and may lead to the notion of a difficult-to-treat disease (D2T). This requires a consensual definition including, beyond the number or therapeutic changes, the assessment of all the dimensions of the disease (objective signs of inflammation, residual pain, degenerative changes, psychosocial context). Recognising D2T patients will enable us to identify a particular population and the factors associated with this condition. When faced with a D2T disease, we need to analyse the causes of treatment failure and take into account the different components of the disease and the patient. In the absence of any prospect of new therapeutic targets in the short term for this disease, patient management may involve intensification of non-pharmacological means and evaluation of new therapeutic strategies such as combinations of targeted treatments.

Poly-Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Uncommon Subset of Difficult to Treat Disease With Distinct Inflammatory and Noninflammatory Phenotypes.

To investigate the prevalence of poly-refractory rheumatoid arthritis (RA) defined as failure of all biological (b)/targeted synthetic (ts)-disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs). To further investigate whether patients with persistent inflammatory refractory RA (PIRRA) and noninflammatory refractory RA (NIRRA), determined by objective ultrasound (US) synovitis, have distinct clinical phenotypes in both EULAR difficult-to-treat RA (D2T-RA) and poly-refractory RA groups. A cross-sectional study of 1,591 patients with RA on b/tsDMARDs that evaluated D2T-RA criteria and subclassified as poly-refractory if inefficacy/toxicity to at least one drug of all classes. PIRRA was defined if US synovitis in one or more swollen joint and NIRRA if absent. Univariate tests and multivariate logistic regression were conducted to investigate factors associated with poly-refractory, PIRRA, and NIRRA phenotypes. 122 of 1,591 were excluded due to missing data. 247 of 1,469 (16.8%) had D2T-RA and only 40 of 1,469 (2.7%) poly-refractory RA. This latter group had higher disease activity score 28 C-reactive protein (CRP) (median 5.4 vs 5.02, P < 0.05), CRP levels (median 13 vs 5 mg/l, P < 0.01), and smoking (ever) rates (20% vs 4%, P < 0.01) compared with other D2T patients. Smoking was associated with poly-refractory RA (odds ratio 5.067, 95% CI 1.774-14.472, P = 0.002). Of 107 patients with D2T-RA with recent US, 61 (57%) were PIRRA and 46 (43%), NIRRA. Patients with NIRRA had elevated body mass index (median 30 vs 26, P < 0.001) and higher fibromyalgia prevalence (15% vs 3%, P < 0.05), lower swollen joint count (median: 2 vs 5, P < 0.001), and lower CRP levels (5 vs 10, P < 0.01). Only 2.7% of D2T-RA failed all classes of b/tsDMARDs. Among D2T-RA, less than 60% had objective signs of inflammation, representing a target for innovative strategies.

Persistent pain and its predictors after starting anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in psoriatic arthritis: what is the role of inflammation control?

Objective While considerable focus has been placed on pain due to inflammation in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), less is reported on pain despite inflammation control. Here, we aimed to investigate the occurrence/predictors of persistent pain, including non-inflammatory components, after starting anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Method Bionaïve PsA patients starting a first anti-TNF therapy 2004–2010 were identified (South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group register; N = 351). Outcomes included unacceptable pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) pain > 40 mm], and unacceptable pain despite inflammation control (refractory pain; VAS pain > 40 mm + C-reactive protein < 10 mg/L + ≤ 1 swollen joint of 28), assessed at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. Baseline predictors were estimated by logistic regression. Results Upon starting anti-TNF therapy, 85% of patients reported unacceptable pain, falling to 43% at 3 months and then remaining stable. After 12 months, refractory pain constituted 63% of all unacceptable pain. Higher baseline VAS pain/global, worse physical function and lower health-related quality-of-life were associated with a higher risk of unacceptable/refractory pain at 12 months. More swollen joints and higher evaluator’s global assessment were associated with a lower risk of 12-month refractory pain. Conclusions A substantial proportion of PsA patients reported unacceptable pain throughout the first anti-TNF treatment year. At 12 months, refractory pain constituted about two-thirds of this remaining pain load. More objective signs of inflammation at anti-TNF initiation were associated with less future refractory pain. This highlights insufficient effect of biologics in patients with inflammation-independent pain, warranting alternative treatments.

P186 Long-term safety of ixekizumab in adult patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis

P186 Long-term safety of ixekizumab in adult patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis

Factors associated with the retention of secukinumab in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in real-world practice: results from a retrospective study (FORSYA)

BackgroundSecukinumab efficacy and retention data are emerging in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in real-world settings. However, limited data are available on the predictive factors that affect the retention rate....

Comparative Efficacy of Biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs for Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Literature Review and Bucher Indirect Comparisons.

Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), including certolizumab pegol (CZP), are effective treatment options for the management of non-radiographic spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). In the absence of head-to-head comparisons in nr-axSpA, we conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and indirect treatment comparison (ITC) to better understand the comparative efficacy of CZP vs. other bDMARDs. Literature searches were conducted in October 2020 in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify randomized controlled trials in patients with nr-axSpA who had failed at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and were treated with bDMARDs. Outcomes of interest included the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society (ASAS), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and spinal pain score. Comparative efficacy was examined using a series of Bucher ITCs in subgroups matched by prior exposure to bDMARDs, disease duration, baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) status, and timepoints, to ensure comparability between studies. At 12-16weeks, treatment with CZP was significantly more likely to achieve ASAS20/40 response and ASDAS-inactive disease status vs. etanercept (ETN), ixekizumab (IXE), and secukinumab (SEC). CZP showed statistically significant improvement in BASDAI, BASFI, and total spine pain score over adalimumab (ADA), ETN, and IXE, and in BASFI over SEC. Among patients with objective signs of inflammation (OSI; elevated CRP levels and/or inflammation on MRI at baseline), CZP had a statistically significant advantage over ETN and SEC (with or without loading dose) in achieving ASAS40, whereas the comparisons with other bDMARDs did not show any statistically significant differences. In the overall matched population, CZP performed significantly better than most comparators in improving the clinical outcomes. Among patients with OSI, CZP was found to be superior to SEC (in the MRI-/CRP + and MRI + /CRP- subgroups) and ETN (in the MRI + /CRP- subgroup) and it was comparable to golimumab and IXE across the different OSI subgroups.

Effects of ixekizumab treatment on structural changes in the sacroiliac joint: MRI assessments at 16 weeks in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

There is limited understanding regarding the inhibition of structural damage in the sacroiliac joint of patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. This study evaluated the effect of the interleukin-17A inhibitor ixekizumab versus placebo on structural lesions in the sacroiliac joints as assessed by MRI at week 16 in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis from the COAST-X study. COAST-X was a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study done at 107 sites in 15 countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with active axial spondyloarthritis without definite radiographic sacroiliitis (non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis), objective signs of inflammation (via MRI or C-reactive protein), and an inadequate response or intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were randomly allocated to placebo or double-blind ixekizumab 80 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 2 weeks (Q2W), with an 80 mg or 160 mg starting dose. We report a post-hoc analysis of 266 patients with available MRI scans from baseline and week 16. MRI scans were scored using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) sacroiliac joint structural score (SSS) method independently by two masked readers. Treatment comparisons used analysis of covariance based on observed cases. Correlations were evaluated among changes in SPARCC SSS for erosion, fat lesions, and backfill, and between changes in SPARCC SSS and sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and clinical measures. COAST-X was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02757352. Between Aug 2, 2016, and Jan 29, 2018, 303 patients were enrolled to the COAST-X study. 290 (96%) of 303 participants completed the week 16 visit (95 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, 98 in the ixekizumab Q2W group, and 97 in the placebo group), and MRI scans were available for 266 patients at baseline and week 16 (85 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, 91 in the ixekizumab Q2W group, and 90 in the placebo group). Changes from baseline to week 16 in mean SPARCC SSS for erosion were -0·39 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·003 vs placebo), -0·40 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·002), and 0·16 for placebo; for fat lesions: 0·16 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·013), 0·10 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·067), and -0·04 for placebo; and for backfill: 0·21 for ixekizumab Q4W (p=0·011), 0·22 for ixekizumab Q2W (p=0·006), and -0·10 for placebo. Ankylosis did not change. Effects of ixekizumab versus placebo on structural changes were most pronounced in patients with baseline inflammation in the sacroiliac joints. Changes from baseline at week 16 in erosion, fat lesions, and backfill were correlated. Although the clinical relevance is not yet clear, patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis receiving ixekizumab had significant reductions in erosions and increases in fat lesions and backfill in the sacroiliac joints versus placebo at week 16, suggesting an early repair process with ixekizumab treatment. Eli Lilly and Company.

Options to optimize the orthopedic treatment protocol to prevent inflammatory complications at the immediate prosthetic stage in patients after multiple teeth extraction

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous multiple loss of teeth significantly increases the need for immediate orthopedic treatment in dental patients, often with the use of removable immediate dentures due to general somatic pathologies and local Dental Prostheses System features.&#x0D; AIM: The study aimed to optimize the orthopedic treatment protocol for patients after multiple teeth extractions.&#x0D; MATERIAL AND METHODS: As part of the study, the orthopedic preparation of 18 patients was conducted for further permanent prosthetics. Patients underwent tooth extraction in the upper or lower jaw amounting to the formation of included, combined, or terminal dentition defects. The following were used for patient treatment: a standard protocol for immediate prosthetics, a modified protocol, including an improved method of vital mucous membrane staining of the prosthetic bed in the surgical intervention area using standard and immediate original design prostheses. The treatment option effectiveness was evaluated based on the results of diagnostic monitoring of wound healing zones in the prosthetic bed area of immediate prostheses, including visual-palpation assessment, vital oral mucosa staining with an iodine-containing diagnostic solution to control inflammation, and a modified Doppler observation method.&#x0D; RESULTS: Study results revealed that all patients, who used standard immediate prostheses without considering the diagnostic control of inflammation areas, had objective signs of inflammation up to the 20th day of treatment with low microcirculation dynamics in the wound healing area. In 4 out of 6 patients using standard immediate prostheses, considering inflammation control, the vital staining indicators by day 20 indicated a possible trend toward chronic inflammation development in the prosthetic bed area, which was confirmed by an unstable microcirculation picture. The severity of inflammatory changes was insignificant in patients who received the original design of the immediate prosthesis, starting from the 7th day of observation and minimal by the 20th day. At this time the hemodynamics are physiologically normal.&#x0D; CONCLUSIONS: Based on the study results, the orthopedic rehabilitation protocols effectiveness, with the use of a modified design based on the immediate prosthesis and permanent diagnostic, mucous membrane staining of the prosthetic bed was established to detect inflammatory complications in the wound healing areas.

Certolizumab Pegol Efficacy in Patients With Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Stratified by Baseline MRI and C-Reactive Protein Status: An Analysis From the C-axSpAnd Study.

ObjectiveTumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are an effective treatment for non‐radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr‐axSpA). To be eligible, however, many authorities require patients with nr‐axSpA to show active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or an elevated C‐reactive protein (CRP) level, possibly resulting in a perception that patients with nr‐axSpA without both factors have only low responses to TNFi treatment. We evaluated clinical responses to certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with nr‐axSpA stratified by baseline MRI/CRP status.MethodsC‐axSpAnd was a phase 3, multicenter study on CZP in adult patients with active nr‐axSpA and objective signs of inflammation. This analysis assessed efficacy of CZP over the 52‐week randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled period in patients stratified into subgroups based on the presence of active sacroiliitis on MRI and CRP level at baseline.ResultsCZP‐treated patients across all MRI/CRP subgroups achieved clinical responses greater than placebo. Across outcome measures, CZP‐treated MRI+/CRP+ patients demonstrated the greatest clinical responses, but substantial improvements were also observed in CZP‐treated MRI+/CRP− and MRI−/CRP+ patients. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Major Improvement response rates at week 52 among CZP‐treated patients (75.6% MRI+/CRP+; 47.5% MRI−/CRP+; and 29.7% MRI+/CRP−) were higher than rates in placebo groups (range: 3.9%‐12.5%). Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% response, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and Bath Ankylosing Spondyloarthritis Functional Index had similar response patterns, although differences between the CZP‐treated MRI/CRP subgroups were smaller. Clinical responses among CZP‐treated patients were also observed in additional subgroups, including those with low Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada MRI sacroiliac joint inflammation scores and those with normal baseline CRP levels.ConclusionOur findings indicate that CZP treatment benefits patients with nr‐axSpA across MRI+/CRP+, MRI−/CRP+, and MRI+/CRP− subgroups.

Long-term safety and clinical outcomes of certolizumab pegol treatment in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 3-year results from the phase 3 C-axSpAnd study

Background52-week results from C-axSpAnd demonstrated the safety and efficacy of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in patients with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) and objective signs of inflammation (sacroiliitis on MRI and/or...

Safety of rapid intravenous paracetamol infusion in paediatric patients

PurposeParacetamol is recommended as a first-line treatment for pain and fever in paediatric patients. Intravenous (IV) infusions are recommended to be administered as a 15-min infusion to minimize local tissue trauma and related pain. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that IV paracetamol could be administered during 5 ​min or less in paediatric patients without causing related adverse reactions. MethodsProspective, observational safety study including children aged <18 years who received IV paracetamol. Pain scores before and after the paracetamol infusions were obtained using VAS, FLACC, COMFORT neo, or COMFORT behaviour scales with scores from 0 to 10 representing no pain to worst pain. Further, objective signs of inflammation at the infusion site were registered. FindingsWe included 44 patients (median age 2.8 years, range 0.01–17.0 years) who received paracetamol in a peripheral venous catheter (n ​= ​22) or central venous catheter (n ​= ​22). In total, the 93 paracetamol infusions had a median infusion time of 3:00 ​min, range 0:40 to 5:00 ​min. After infusions, pain scores were lower, compared to before infusions (mean change −0.26, 95% confidence interval −0.45 to −0.07, P ​= ​0.007), and no objective signs of inflammation were reported. ImplicationsThis safety study indicates that IV paracetamol can be administered in paediatric patients with a shorter infusion time than recommended without causing adverse reactions. The results may contribute to a more efficient workflow at paediatric departments.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab for the treatment of Crohn's disease: the Scottish ustekinumab cohort.

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin-12/23. In Scotland, it was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease in 2017. The objective of this study was to establish the real-world effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in the treatment of Crohn's disease. We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving ustekinumab across eight Scottish National Health Service health boards between 2017 and 2019. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of Crohn's disease with symptoms attributed to active disease plus objective signs of inflammation at baseline (C-reactive protein≥5mg/L or fecal calprotectin≥250μg/g or inflammation on endoscopy/magnetic resonance imaging) and completion of induction plus at least one clinical follow-up at 8weeks. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to establish 12-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, deep remission, and perianal fistula response. Rates of serious adverse events were described quantitatively. Our cohort consisted of 216 patients (female sex, 37.9%; median age, 39.0years, interquartile range [IQR] 28.8-51.8years; disease duration, 9.9years, IQR 6.0-16.5years; prior biologic, 98.6%) with a median follow-up of 35.0weeks (IQR 17.4-52.0weeks). Twelve-month cumulative rates of clinical remission, mucosal healing, and deep remission (clinical remission plus mucosal healing) were 32.0%, 32.7%, and 19.3%, respectively. In patients with active perianal disease (n=37), the 12-month cumulative perianal response rate was 53.1%. The serious adverse event rate was 13.6 per 100 patient-years of follow-up. Ustekinumab is a safe and effective treatment for the treatment of complex Crohn's disease.

Validation of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life assessment tool in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis

PurposeTo evaluate the psychometric performance of the Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) scale in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) to assess its appropriateness as an outcome measure in future clinical studies.MethodsPatients with active axSpA from a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAPID-axSpA, NCT01087762) were included (N = 325). Modified New York (mNY) classification criteria were used to classify patients as having ankylosing spondylitis or nr-axSpA; those with nr-axSpA were further categorized based on objective signs of inflammation. Psychometric properties of the ASQoL were assessed/documented using a mixture of modern psychometric methods and classical test theory methods. These included exploratory factor analysis and item response theory models to assess the domain structure, test the utility of a single domain relative to subdomains, assess bias, and generate statistics to guide an empirical scoring algorithm. The reliability and validity of scores were evaluated via internal consistency, test–retest reliability, concurrent validity, and known-groups validity. Score responsiveness was assessed via anchor-based clinically meaningful change, supplemented with empirical cumulative distribution function visualizations.ResultsThe ASQoL data were defined by four domains. However, a four-domain solution was found to be inferior to a bifactor solution in which the four domains were included within a total domain. Scoring statistics supported a unit-weighted total score. Within the nr-axSpA population with objective signs of inflammation, the ASQoL mean score had adequate reliability, validity, and ability to detect clinically meaningful change.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the ASQoL is an appropriate outcome measure in interventional clinical trials in patients with nr-axSpA.

Characteristics of the articular syndrome in patients with infl ammatory bowel disease

The aim to study: To study the structure and clinical features of the course of joint damage as an extra-intestinal manifestation in patients with infl ammatory bowel diseases.Materials and methods: 332 patients with infl ammatory bowel diseases were questioned and examined, who applied to the gastroenterological offi ce and were hospitalized at the Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital from October 2017 to November 2019.Results: Joint syndrome was found in 94 (28.3%) patients with IBD, more often had an oligoarticular character (79 (84%) patients) with localization mainly in the joints of the lower extremities. When examining patients, peripheral arthritis was diagnosed in 41 (43.6%) patients, osteoarthrosis was detected in 38 (40.4%), 13 (13.8%) patients did not have objective signs of infl ammation.

P242 CZP improves work and household productivity and social participation over 1 year of treatment in patients with non-radiographic axSpA

Abstract Background Certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment has been shown to significantly improve work and household productivity and social participation compared to placebo in active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA) patients up to 24 weeks. Here, we report the impact of CZP in combination with non-biologic background medication (NBBM) on signs and symptoms of nr-axSpA compared to placebo+NBBM. Methods C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) is a 3-year, phase 3, multicentre study including a 52-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period (completed). Patients had active nr-axSpA, objective signs of inflammation (OSI; elevated CRP and/or positive MRI of the sacroiliac joint), previous inadequate response to ≥ 2 NSAIDs and were randomised 1:1 to CZP (400 mg at Weeks 0/2/4, then 200 mg every 2 weeks) or placebo. The validated arthritis-specific Work Productivity Survey (WPS) assessed the impact of nr-axSpA on work and household productivity and social participation. Missing data were imputed using last observation carried forward (LOCF) post hoc in the Full Analysis Set (randomised patients who received ≥1 dose of CZP). Results 317 patients were randomised (CZP: 159; placebo: 158). Mean age at baseline was 37.3 years and 51.4% of patients were female. At baseline, most patients were employed (CZP: 124 [77.8%]; placebo: 123 [78.0%]) and reported a mean 3.7 (CZP) and 3.5 (placebo) workdays missed per month due to disease (Table 1). By Week 12, work absenteeism substantially improved in the CZP group compared with placebo (0.9 vs 2.1 days missed per month, LOCF), with further improvements at Week 52 (0.3 vs 2.0 days missed per month, LOCF). Between Week 12 and Week 52, most placebo patients (104, 65.8%) switched to open-label CZP, impacting Week 52 imputed outcomes. Despite this, similar patterns of improvement following CZP treatment were seen for absenteeism, workdays with impaired productivity, household days with missed/reduced productivity and social participation between imputed and observed case data (Table 1). Improvements were similar between male and female patients (data not shown). Conclusion CZP treatment resulted in improvements in work and household productivity and social participation for nr-axSpA patients as early as Week 12 compared to background medication only, with benefits maintained to Week 52. Disclosures K. Gaffney: Other; Research Grants/Consultancy Fees from Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Izana, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith and Klein, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; BMS, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith &amp; Kline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. L. Gensler: Consultancies; Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Janssen. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, UCB Pharma. J. Kay: Consultancies; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion Healthcare, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme, MorphoSys, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Gilead Sciences, Novartis AG, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. W. Maksymowych: Other; Consultant and/or speaker fees and/or grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc, Sanofi and UCB Pharma. N. Haroon: Consultancies; Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma. R. Landewé: Consultancies; Abbott, Ablynx, Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Centocor, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth. Member of speakers’ bureau; Abbott, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Centocor, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth. Grants/research support; Abbott, Amgen, Centocor, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB Pharma, Wyeth. M. Rudwaleit: Consultancies; Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma. S. Hall: Other; Consulting fees/ research grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB Pharma. L. Bauer: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. B. Hoepken: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. N. de Peyrecave: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. T. Kumke: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. Other; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV.

P284 Certolizumab pegol-treated patients with non-radiographic axSpA demonstrate improvements in sleep quality and other patient reported outcomes

Abstract Background Certolizumab pegol (CZP) treatment has demonstrated improvements in multiple manifestations of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), including patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Here, we report PROs for nr-axSpA patients treated with CZP or placebo in CaxSpAnd - the first 52-week placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy of an anti-TNF agent in patients with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation. Methods C-axSpAnd (NCT02552212) is a 3-year, phase 3, multicenter study including a 52-week double-blind, placebo-controlled period (completed); patients who had an inadequate response to ≥ 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were randomized 1:1 to placebo or CZP (400mg at Weeks 0/2/4, then 200mg every 2 weeks). Clinical PROs included: Sleep Problems Index scores I (6 items) and II (9 items) from the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale (assesses sleep disturbance, adequacy, somnolence, quantity, snoring, and awakening short of breath or with a headache), nocturnal spinal pain (numerical rating scale [NRS]), fatigue (BASDAI Q1), and morning stiffness (average of BASDAI Q5 + 6). Post-hoc analyses of minimal clinically important differences (MCID [≥1-point improvement]) for fatigue and nocturnal spinal pain were conducted. Variables were analyzed using an ANCOVA model including baseline score as a covariate and fixed effects for treatment group, region and MRI/CRP classification. P-values were nominal. Missing values following discontinuation of double-blind treatment were imputed using last observation carried forward. Results 317 patients with nr-axSpA were randomised to CZP (n = 159) or placebo (n = 158); 125 (79%) and 54 (34%) patients, respectively, completed Week 52. CZP-treated patients showed greater improvements (indicated by higher scores) in Sleep Problems Index II scores vs placebo-treated patients at Week 12 (mean change from baseline: 4.8 [CZP] vs 2.2 [placebo]; p &amp;lt; 0.001). Improvements were also seen in other clinical PROs (Table). By Week 12, greater proportions of patients treated with CZP vs placebo experienced at least MCID response in fatigue (85.4% vs 57.6%, respectively) and nocturnal spinal pain (82.8% vs 58.9%, respectively); results were sustained through Week 52. Conclusion CZP-treated nr-axSpA patients showed substantial improvements in sleep quality and other clinical outcomes important to patients; future analyses of these data will explore associations between sleep quality and other clinical PROs. Disclosures R. Sengupta: Other; R.S. has received speaker fees, support for conference attendance and grants from Abbvie, Biogen, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. L. Gensler: Grants/research support; AbbVie, Amgen, Novartis, UCB Pharma; consulting fees from Galapagos, Eli Lilly and Janssen. J. Kay: Consultancies; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celltrion Healthcare, Horizon Therapeutics, Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme, MorphoSys, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung Bioepis, Sandoz and UCB Pharma. Grants/research support; Gilead Sciences, Novartis AG, Pfizer and UCB Pharma. W. Maksymowych: Other; Consultant and/or speaker fees and/or grants from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Synarc, Sanofi and UCB Pharma. N. Haroon: Consultancies; Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis and UCB Pharma. L. Bauer: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. B. Hoepken: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. N. de Peyrecave: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. T. Kumke: Other; Employee of UCB Pharma. A. Deodhar: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith and Klein, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB. Grants/research support; BMS, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith &amp; Kline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB.

Ixekizumab for patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-X): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Ixekizumab, a high-affinity interleukin-17A (IL-17A) monoclonal antibody, has previously shown efficacy in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (also known as ankylosing spondylitis). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab, an IL-17 inhibitor, in non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. Here, we report the primary results of COAST-X. COAST-X was a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study done at 107 sites in 15 countries in Europe, Asia, North America, and South America. Eligible participants were adults (aged ≥18 years) with active axial spondyloarthritis without definite radiographic sacroiliitis (non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis), objective signs of inflammation (via MRI or C-reactive protein), and an inadequate response or intolerance to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive subcutaneous 80 mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) or every 2 weeks (Q2W), or placebo. Changing background medications or switching to open-label ixekizumab Q2W, or both, was allowed after week 16 at investigator discretion. Primary endpoints were Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society-40 (ASAS40) response (defined as an improvement of 40% or more and an absolute improvement from baseline of 2 units or more [range 0-10] in at least three of the four domains [patient global, spinal pain, function, and inflammation] without any worsening in the remaining one domain) at weeks 16 and 52. Patients who switched to open-label ixekizumab were imputed as non-responders in logistic regression analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02757352. Between Aug 2, 2016, and Jan 29, 2018, 303 patients were enrolled (105 to placebo, 96 to ixekizumab Q4W, and 102 to ixekizumab Q2W). Both primary endpoints were met: ASAS40 at week 16 (ixekizumab Q4W: 34 [35%] of 96, p=0·0094 vs placebo; ixekizumab Q2W: 41 [40%] of 102, p=0·0016; placebo: 20 [19%] of 105) and ASAS40 at week 52 (ixekizumab Q4W: 29 [30%] of 96, p=0·0045; ixekizumab Q2W: 32 [31%] of 102, p=0·0037; placebo: 14 [13%] of 105). 60 (57%) of 104 patients in the placebo group, 63 (66%) of 96 in the ixekizumab Q4W group, and 79 (77%) of 102 in the ixekizumab Q2W group had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the ixekizumab groups were nasopharyngitis and injection site reaction. Of the treatment-emergent adverse events of special interest, there was one case of serious infection in the ixekizumab Q4W group. The frequency of serious adverse events was low (four [1%] of 302) and similar across the three groups. There were no malignancies or deaths. No new safety signals were identified. Ixekizumab was superior to placebo for improving signs and symptoms in patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis at weeks 16 and 52. Reports of adverse events were similar to those of previous ixekizumab studies. Ixekizumab offers a potential therapeutic option for patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis who had an inadequate response or were intolerant to NSAID therapy. Eli Lilly and Company.

Efficiency of treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs according to current recommendations in patients with radiographic and non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis.

NSAIDs are first-line therapy in axial SpA (axSpA). The proportion of patients responding to NSAIDs and differences between AS and non-radiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA) in this regard have not been studied in detail to date. The aim of this study was to examine the proportion of patients with AS and nr-axSpA responding to NSAIDs according to current treatment recommendations. Consecutive anti-TNF-naïve patients with nr-axSpA and AS (n = 50 each) were included if their BASDAI score was ⩾4 without having received maximal NSAID doses. In case of a BASDAI score ⩾4 1 week later, another NSAID was prescribed. For the next 3 weeks, continuous intake of maximal doses was recommended but patients could reduce doses in case of intolerance or improvement. MRI of the SI joints was performed at baseline and week 4. All outcomes except for CRP and MRI scores improved significantly after 4 weeks of NSAIDs, with no difference between axSpA subgroups. An Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 40% (ASAS40) response and partial remission rates were 35 and 16% at week 4, respectively. At the same time point, a BASDAI score ⩾4 was still present in 44% of patients, 30% of which had reduced NSAID doses, partly due to intolerance (38%). Only 13% of all patients had continuously taken NSAIDs at the maximal dosage, but there was no difference in the efficacy outcome compared with those who had taken reduced doses. AS and nr-axSpA patients had similar response rates to NSAIDs while objective signs of inflammation did not change over 4 weeks. Only a minority of patients was willing to take maximal doses of NSAIDs, and ⩾40% patients remained candidates for TNF blockers. These results may influence future trial designs.

New evidence on the management of spondyloarthritis.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the first-line treatment for patients with symptomatic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA), who seem to respond best if treated early in the course of disease. The effect of NSAIDs on radiographic disease progression is less clear. Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are not recommended in the treatment of axial SpA, either alone or in combination with TNF blockers. Patients with nonradiographic axial SpA (nr-axSpA) seem to respond as well to TNF blockers as do patients with radiographic axial SpA (ankylosing spondylitis (AS)). However, patients with nr-axSpA should, in addition to a high severity of symptoms, also have objective signs of inflammation, detectable by MRI or by C-reactive protein testing, to be treated with TNF blockers. Whether early TNF-blocker treatment can retard new bone formation needs clarification. In clinical trials, anti-IL-17 agents and TNF blockers showed similar efficacy in patients with AS. The potential of IL-23 blockade for treatment of axial SpA needs to be further investigated. Treatment options for peripheral SpA have been much less thoroughly investigated than those for axial SpA. However, some data indicate that TNF blockers are effective for treating peripheral arthritis, enthesitis and dactylitis, the typical manifestations of peripheral SpA.