Tube feeding is often presented as a nearly risk free and beneficial treatment for patients with dementia. But evidence shows that its benefits are illusory, while its risks are greater than many realize. Assisted oral feeding and good hospice care are better options. The syndrome of advanced, progressive, and irreversible dementia can be caused by a number of diseases associated with aging. Because Alzheimer disease is the most common cause of such dementia, however, it provides a useful point of focus for thinking about the problems of caring for persons with dementia. Approximately 60 percent of cases of dementia the American elderly are secondary to Alzheimer's,[1] and an estimated 47 percent of persons eighty-five years and older (the old-old) have probable Alzheimer's.[2] It is thought that between 637,600 and 922,500 nursing home residents have dementia; the number of residents with Alzheimer's lies somewhere between 382,500 and 553,500,[3] about half of whom are the advanced stage.[4] Most persons with Alzheimer's are likely to be institutionalized four to six years after symptom onset; they spend an average of three to four years the nursing home before death.[5] One of the pre-eminent problems caring for persons with dementia is deciding whether and how to provide food and water. It is unclear how many persons with advanced dementia are provided with artificial nutrition and hydration through long-term tube feeding, almost always the form of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), but the practice is common. In 1991, 59,669 Medicare beneficiaries (who are sixty-five years of age and older) were hospitalized for PEG placement, many of whom were then discharged to skilled nursing facilities or to home care. This represents a steep rise from 1985 levels.[6] Of those who undergo PEG placement, how many have dementia is unknown, since this secondary diagnosis is not well reported relevant databases. Among Orthodox Jews, implementing tube feedings for a family member with progressive dementia is standard.[7] Influential spokespersons for Catholicism, however, do not conclude that a person with advanced dementia should be supported by tube feeding, so long as nothing is done to hasten death.[8] In some cases, patients with Alzheimer's will live long enough with PEG tube feeding that they progress to a persistent vegetative state.[9] Such troubling scenarios are peculiarly contemporary. Gastrostomy tube feeding became common the context of advanced dementia and elderly patients more generally after 1981, secondary to the development of the PEG procedure. Initially developed by Michael Gauderer and his colleagues at Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital Cleveland for use young children with swallowing difficulties, PEG placement requires only local anesthesia, eliminating the significant surgical risks of general anesthesia and infection. Yet there is increasing concern about the proliferation of the procedure. In his recent review of the history of PEG use, for example, Gauderer has written that while PEG use has benefited countless patients, in part because of its simplicity and low complication rate, this minimally invasive procedure also lends itself to over-utilization, and he calls for more attention to the ethics of PEG use.[10] There seems to be no ethical question about PEG use patients who have some chance of recovering from an acute event, such as stroke, but for those dying of progressive dementia, the evidence is growing that PEG feeding provides no benefit.[11] The mounting literature was well summarized recently by Finucane and colleagues, who found no published evidence that PEG feeding prevents aspiration pneumonia, prolongs survival, reduces risks of pressure sores or infections, improves function, or provides palliation this population.[12] Also, older adults are apparently over-whelmingly opposed to PEG placement. In a recent study based on personal interviews with eighty-four cognitively normal men and women aged sixty-five years and older from a variety of urban and suburban settings (including private homes, assisted-living apartments, transitional care facilities, and nursing homes), three-fourths of the participants declared that they would not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation, use of a respirator, or parenteral or enteral tube nutrition with the milder forms of dementia, and a full 95 percent or more would not want any of these procedures with severe dementia. …
Read full abstract