Nutritional Risk Screening Research Articles

Prediction of spirometry outcome in Croatian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

The current study offers an extensive examination of the influence of 29 diverse parameters on spirometry measurement variables in a cohort of 534 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from five different centers in Croatia. The study elucidates both the magnitude and direction of the effect exerted by the 29 predictors on forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), the ratio FEV1/FVC, and predicted forced expiratory flow at 50% of FVC. Additionally, the development of prediction models for these parameters has been undertaken using several statistical methods. The study identifies fat-free mass index, 6-minute walk distance, predicted diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, arterial partial pressure of oxygen, and both arterial and tissue hemoglobin oxygen saturation percentage as robust positive predictors for all four spirometry parameters. Body mass index is recognized as a weak positive predictor for FEV1 and FEV1/FVC, commonly observed in COPD patients. As expected, smoking years is identified as a strong negative predictor for all four spirometry parameters, while age and illness duration exhibit strong predictive negative associations. Furthermore, modified medical research council, arterial partial pressure carbon dioxide, St George's respiratory questionnaire, COPD assessment test, depression anxiety stress scales, and nutritional risk screening are identified as weak negative predictors. Charlson comorbidity index, phase angle, and number of comorbidities do not exhibit a significant impact on spirometry variables. Ultimately, the performed factorial analysis categorized the 29 parameters into five groups, which were identified as relating to lung function, health status, nutritional status, age, and smoking. Multiple regression analysis, including four newly derived parameters based on the results of factorial analysis, identified nutritional status as a positive predictor for spirometry readings, while smoking, poor health status, and age were identified as negative predictors in successive order.

Nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancers and analysis of factors for postoperative infections.

Patients with gastrointestinal cancer have a higher risk of malnutrition and postoperative infection. To investigate the nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancers and factors for postoperative infections. Based on the nutritional risk status, 294 patients with gastrointestinal tumours were divided into a nutritional risk group and a non-nutritional risk group, and the differences between the two groups were compared. Among the included patients, 128 were at preoperative nutritional risk (43.54%); there were significant differences between the two groups in terms of age (66.25 ± 11.73 vs. 58.36 ± 10.41 years, P < 0.001), percentage of gastric cancers (39.84% vs. 28.92%, P = 0.049), percentage of stage IV tumours (60.16% vs. 45.18%, P = 0.011), total protein (64.90 ± 6.82 vs. 67.21 ± 7.41g/L, P = 0.007), albumin (38.32 ± 4.74 vs. 41.61 ± 5.10g/L, P < 0.001) and haemoglobin (112.72 ± 22.63 vs. 125.11 ± 22.79g/L, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that risk factors for postoperative infections in patients included age ≥ 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.266 95%CI = 1.357-4.134), Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS)-2002 score ≥ 3 (OR = 2.183, 95%CI = 1.218-4.102), alcohol history (OR = 2.505, 95%CI = 1.370-4.683), comorbid diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.110, 95%CI = 1.381-4.023) and surgical time ≥ 6h (OR = 2.446, 95%CI = 1.359-4.758). Patients with gastrointestinal cancers are at high incidence of preoperative nutritional risk, and those with an NRS-2002 score of > 3, history of alcohol consumption and surgical time of > 6h have a higher risk of postoperative infections.

A retrospective cohort study on the association between nutritional status and prognosis in COVID-19 patients with severe and critical infection.

To evaluate the relationship between nutritional scoring systems, nutritional support methods, and the prognosis of severe and critically ill patients infected with the Omicron variant of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with confirmed Omicron variant severe and critical COVID-19, who were admitted to Chongqing Medical University First Hospital between December 2022 and January 2023, were enrolled into this retrospective study. Clinical data of patients who survived for 28 days were compared with those who died during the same period. Nutritional status was assessed using the 2002 Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) tool and Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI). Factors influencing patient mortality were identified by multivariate logistic regression, and the relationship between patient nutrition and mortality as the disease progressed was illustrated using Kaplan-Meier curves. The study was registered on the ChiCTR platform (No. ChiCTR2300067595). A total of 508 patients were included (349 survivors and 159 non-survivors). Significant differences were found in sex, age, NRS score, PNI score, albumin level, lymphocyte count, chronic comorbidities, mechanical ventilation, neutrophil count, procalcitonin, and platelet count between survivors and non-survivors. Multivariate analysis revealed that high NRS score (OR 3.87, 95% CI, 1.97, 7.63), fourth-level nutritional support (combined enteral and parenteral nutrition; OR 7.89, 95% CI, 1.32, 47.28), chronic comorbidities (OR 4.03, 95% CI, 1.91, 8.51), and mechanical ventilation (OR 6.03, 95% CI, 3, 12.13) were risk factors for mortality (OR > 1). The malnutrition rate among patients with NRS ≥ 3 was 41.93%. The median (interquartile range) PNI score was 38.20 (35.65, 41.25) for survivors versus 32.65 (29.65, 36.58) for non-survivors. The mortality rate was higher in patients with high nutritional risk within 28 days of hospitalization. The descending order for mortality rate in patients receiving different nutritional support was: dual parenteral and enteral nutrition, no nutritional intervention, single enteral nutrition, and single parenteral nutrition. A high proportion of severe and critically ill patients with COVID-19 experience malnutrition, and various factors are associated with their prognosis. High nutritional risk is significantly related to patient mortality. Early assessment using NRS or PNI is crucial for these patients, and personalized interventions should be implemented to improve overall nutritional status, maintain organ function, and enhance the body's antiviral defence.

Impact of perioperative high-protein nutritional support on the quality of life of patients with primary lung cancer: a Russian prospective multicenter comparative study (NUTRILUNC study)

BACKGROUND: Individuals over the age of 70 comprise over half of operable patients with stage 0–IIIA lung cancer. In the early postoperative period of this cohort, pain, fatigue, insomnia, and/or mood disturbances are the four most common symptoms, which can significantly diminish quality of life and functional status. Perioperative nutritional support in such patients, which enhances exercise tolerance, can have a positive impact on their quality of life and socialization. AIM: To assess the effect of perioperative nutritional support using high-protein oral nutrition supplements on the general health and quality of life of non-small cell lung cancer patients during the postoperative period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with primary non-small cell lung cancer (n=112, 69 males), aged 57.2±8.2, who were awaiting lung surgery and at risk of malnutrition (Nutritional Risk Screening Assessment 2002 score ≥3) were randomly assigned into two groups. Oral nutritional support (Nutridrink Compact Protein, Nutricia LLC) was administered to the study group (n=55) at a rate of 250 ml/d (36 g of protein, 612 kcal) for 14 days prior to and 14 days following the surgery, in addition to the standard diet. Control group patients (n=57) were provided a standard diet. The quality of life was assessed using the Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Differences were considered significant at p ≤0.05. RESULTS: Throughout the entire observation period, the study group exhibited superior growth indicators in terms of general health status, physical, and role functioning than the control group (p 0.05). The study group patients exhibited a propensity toward improved emotional functioning, and by the end of the study, weakness and insomnia were less pronounced (p 0.05). Other indicators did not exhibit any significant variations. CONCLUSION: Нigh-protein perioperative oral nutrition supplements exert a positive impact on the quality of life of non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Perioperative body composition changes and their clinical implications in patients with gastric cancer undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundThis study aimed to investigate perioperative body composition changes and their clinical implications in patients undergoing radical gastric cancer surgery. MethodsPatient data are prospectively collected. Computed tomography scans were conducted within 30 days preoperatively and on the seventh postoperative day to assess skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Changes in these parameters between the 2 scans were quantified. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors influencing body composition loss and clinical outcomes. ResultsA total of 335 patients were included, showing varying degrees of decline in SMI, SMD, and SAT during the perioperative period. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 and low handgrip strength as independent risk factors for excessive SMI loss, whereas laparoscopic surgery served as a protective factor. For excessive SMD loss, independent risk factors included preoperative low SMD, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 score ≥3, and hypoalbuminemia. Moreover, age ≥65 was identified as an independent risk factor for excessive SAT loss, whereas laparoscopic surgery remained protective. Excessive SMI and SMD loss are correlated with increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stays, and higher costs. Both excessive losses in SMI and SMD are independently associated with the incidence of postoperative complications. Further analysis revealed that excessive SMD loss (odds ratio, 3.164; 95% CI, 1.214–8.243) independently contributed to readmission risk. ConclusionExcessive SMI and SMD loss are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. It is essential to address and improve preoperative modifiable risk factors to reduce perioperative muscle loss and enhance prognosis.

Poor nutrition doubles post-COVID-19 syndrome risk in cancer patients: insights from a Chinese multicentre study

BackgroundSince 2019, approximately 760 million SARS-CoV-2 cases have been reported globally, with post-COVID-19 syndrome posing significant challenges for cancer patients due to their immunosuppressed status and poor nutritional conditions. The role of nutritional status in influencing their infection risk and post-COVID-19 outcomes remains unclear, underscoring the need for targeted research and strategies.ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of baseline nutritional status on SARS-CoV-2 infection and the risk of post-COVID-19 syndrome in cancer patients.MethodsA multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2022 to June 2023 in four tertiary hospitals across China. Cancer inpatients aged 18 years and older were enrolled and classified into two groups based on their Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) scores. The correlation between SARS-CoV-2 infection, post-COVID-19 syndrome and nutritional status were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.ResultsAmong 834 eligible cancer patients, 10.8% were in the high nutritional risk group (NRS ≥ 3). The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 58.8% (95% confidence interval, CI: 56.8–60.8%), and post-COVID-19 syndrome was 21.0% (95% CI: 10.4–14.4%). After adjusting for confounding factors, the high nutritional risk group had a significantly higher prevalence of post-COVID-19 syndrome compared to the low nutritional risk group (32.7% vs. 19.5%, AOR: 2.37, 95% CI: 1.23–4.54, p = 0.010). However, no significant difference in SARS-CoV-2 infection rates was found between the two groups (61.1% vs. 58.5%, AOR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.70–1.80; p = 0.634).InterpretationPoor baseline nutritional status in cancer patients is associated with a higher prevalence of post-COVID-19 syndrome, providing preliminary information on post-COVID-19 syndrome in this population. These findings underscore the importance of adequate nutritional management in cancer patients, particularly during pandemic recurrences.

Feasibility of a multifaceted nutrition-risk screening tool for mental health settings: the NutriMental screener.

People living with mental illness report a broad spectrum of nutrition risks, beyond malnutrition, but appropriate and adequately validated nutrition risk screening tools for mental health settings are lacking. This study aimed to develop a nutrition-risk screening tool, the NutriMental Screener, and to perform preliminary feasibility and validity testing. In an international, stakeholder engaging approach, a multifaceted nutrition-risk screening tool for mental health services was developed by means of workshops with international stakeholders and two online surveys. Feasibility of the NutriMental screener was tested as part of a research study in Switzerland with 196 participants, evenly distributed across the three study groups (sixty-seven outpatients and sixty-five inpatients with psychotic or depressive disorders as well as sixty-four controls without mental illness). The NutriMental screener consists of ten items covering different nutritional issues that indicate the need for referral to a dietitian or clinical nutritionist. Almost all patients (94·7 %) reported at least one nutrition risk by means of the NutriMental screener. Prevalence for nutrition risks via NutriMental screener was higher in patients than in controls. Almost every second patient expressed a desire for nutritional support (44·7 %). After further validity testing is completed, there is the potential for the NutriMental Screener to replace malnutrition screening tools as routine screening in various mental health settings aiming to organise nutritional therapy prescriptions in a more targeted and efficient manner.

Application of NRS2002 and PG-SGA in nutritional assessment for perioperative patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An observational study.

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 2 nutritional assessment tools, the Nutritional Risk Screening Scale 2002 (NRS2002) and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA), for evaluating the nutritional status of perioperative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, to facilitate early nutritional interventions and improve clinical outcomes. An observational, comparative study was conducted at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, recruiting patients diagnosed with HNSCC scheduled for surgical treatment. The NRS2002 and PG-SGA were applied to assess patients' nutritional risk at multiple time points: upon admission, the day before surgery, 2 days after surgery, a week after surgery, and at discharge. Statistical analyses were performed using McNemar and Kappa tests to assess differences and consistency between NRS2002 and PG-SGA. A total of 209 patients were included in this study, predominantly male, with an average age of 60 years. Nutritional risk assessments identified an inverted "V" trend in nutritional risk, with the peak occurring 2 days post-surgery. PG-SGA consistently showed a higher screening positivity rate compared to NRS2002. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis highlighted the discriminative power of both tools, with PG-SGA and NRS2002 showing high area under the curve values. Both NRS2002 and PG-SGA are effective for nutritional screening in HNSCC patients, with PG-SGA demonstrating a slightly higher sensitivity before surgery. PG-SGA may be more suitable for preoperative application, whereas NRS2002 is more appropriate for postoperative use.

Two-step GLIM approach using NRS-2002 screening tool vs direct GLIM criteria application in hospital malnutrition diagnosis: A cross-sectional study.

The two-step Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) approach was recently introduced to malnutrition diagnosis in a hospital setting. This study compares the diagnostic performance of this approach that uses the Nutritional Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002) as a screening tool and the direct application of GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria in hospitalized patients. This cross-sectional study involved 290 adult and older adult patients who were hospitalized. A trained nutritionist implemented the two-step GLIM approach, including NRS-2002 (in the first step) and GLIM criteria (in the second step) for each patient. Then, the accuracy, kappa index, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC), sensitivity, and specificity of malnutrition diagnostic performance of the two-step GLIM approach and NRS-2002 were evaluated compared to thedirect use of GLIM criteria. The NRS-2002 identified 145 (50.0%) patients as at risk of malnutrition. The prevalence of malnutrition using the two-step GLIM approach and GLIM malnutrition diagnosis criteria were 120 (41.4%) and 141 (48.6%), respectively. The kappa index showed substantial and almost perfect agreement for NRS-2002 (κ = 68%) and the two-step GLIM approach (κ = 85%) with GLIM malnutrition diagnostic criteria, respectively. Furthermore, the AUC ROC (0.926; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-0.96) and accuracy (92.8%) of the two-step GLIM approach compared to the GLIM criteria indicated an acepptable ability to distinguish between malnourished and well-nourished patients. The two-step GLIM approach using NRS-2002 as a screening tool (in step one) had acceptable malnutrition diagnostic performance compared to the direct application of GLIM criteria in hospitalized patients.

Malnutrition risk screening in adult oncology outpatients: An ASPEN systematic review and clinical recommendations.

Malnutrition screening is not widely practiced in outpatient cancer centers. This review aims to determine the validity of malnutrition screening tools and provide recommendations for clinical use. Studies identified by a systematic review assessed the general validity of screening tools in adult oncology outpatients from five databases through 2022. The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) convened a working group of members from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Academy of Oncology Nurse and Patient Navigators, American Cancer Society, American Society for Clinical Oncology, American Society for Nutrition, American Society for Radiation Oncology, Association of Cancer Care Centers, and Oncology Nursing Society to answer the following questions: (1) should clinicians screen for malnutrition, (2) which malnutrition screening tools are recommended, and (3) what are the clinical applications for malnutrition risk screening in adult oncology outpatients? Twenty of 738 studies met the criteria and were reviewed. Six screening tools with specific cut-points demonstrated validity and are recommended, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment (≤23.5), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST; MST ≥ 2 and patient-led MST ≥ 2), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST; MUST ≥ 1 and MUST ≥ 2), Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002; NRS-2002 ≥ 2 and NRS-2002 ≥ 3), NUTRISCORE ≥ 5, and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF; PG-SGA SF ≥ 7 and PG-SGA SF ≥ 8). Six screening tools are valid for malnutrition risk identification in oncology ambulatory settings and recommended before treatment initiation and regularly thereafter, depending on treatment course. Research is needed to understand to what extent early diagnosis and management of malnutrition improves the clinical care of oncology patients.

The association between oral frailty and HbA1c among older adults with T2DM: the chain mediating effect of nutritional status and physical frailty.

The present study aimed to explore the association between oral frailty and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the chain mediating role of nutritional status and physical frailty among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients with T2DM aged > 60years were recruited from the endocrinology department of a national metabolic center from October 2023 to March 2024. Oral frailty, nutritional status, and physical frailty were assessed with Oral Frailty Index-8 (OFI-8), the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS2002), Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illness and Loss of Weight Index (FRAIL), respectively. Their HbA1c were collected at the same time. In order to reveal the interaction and influence between multiple variables, chain mediation analyses were conducted using the "Process" macro in SPSS 26.0 to estimate the direct and indirect effects of oral frailty on nutritional status, physical frailty and HbA1c. A total of 292 participants (50.7% male) were enrolled in this study at a median age of 70.0 (65.2, 76.0) years and a T2DM disease duration of (16.5 ± 9.4) years. After adjustment for age, oral frailty of older people with T2DM significantly positively predicted their HbA1c (β = 0.198, P < 0.001). In addition, oral frailty affect HbA1c through two indirect pathways, including an independent mediating effect of physical frailty (effect = 0.046) and a chain-mediating effect of nutritional status and physical frailty (effect = 0.004). Our findings suggest that less oral frailty of older adults with T2DM could optimize their nutritional status and physical frailty and, thus, their HbA1c. Consequently, improving oral health is expected to be a promising intervention target for reaching optimal glycaemic control in older adults with T2DM.

Reduced muscle mass is an important part of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria in nutritional diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

BackgroundThe Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria (GLIM) was established to build a global consensus on the diagnostic criteria for malnutrition. The study aimed to assess the prevalence of the malnutrition diagnosed by GLIM criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and to determine the role of the reduced muscle mass defined by CT scans in the GLIM criteria.MethodsThis cohort research was conducted on adult cirrhotic patients with HCC. The risk of malnutrition was screened by Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), and malnutrition was diagnosed by GLIM criteria. The third lumbar vertebrae (L3-SMI) were used to represent the muscle mass in GLIM criteria. The variables associated with overall mortality were assessed by multivariate Cox regression analyses.ResultsThe incidence of malnutrition diagnosed by GLIM criteria was 49.7% (179/360) in patients with HCC. If reduced muscle mass was not included in GLIM criteria, the prevalence of malnutrition was 31.7% (114/360). GLIM-defined malnutrition (HR = 1.979, 95%CI 1.019–3.841, P = 0.044) was independently associated with overall mortality in patients with HCC. However, the GLIM-defined malnutrition (without muscle mass) was not associated with overall mortality (HR = 0.863, 95%CI 0.399–1.867, P = 0.709).ConclusionsSkeletal muscle mass is an integral component of the GLIM criteria for patients with HCC. The malnutrition is common in patients with HCC, and malnourishment is associated with higher overall mortality. GLIM criteria are recommended to assess the nutritional status of hospitalized patients with HCC, which is recommended and can be used as the basis for nutritional interventions.

Patterns of use of malnutrition risk screening in pediatric populations: A survey of current practice among pediatric hospitals in North America.

Information on the use of validated malnutrition risk screening tools in pediatric facilities to guide malnutrition identification, diagnosis, and treatment is scarce. Therefore, a survey of pediatric healthcare facilities and practitioners to ascertain malnutrition risk screening practices in North America was conducted. A pediatric nutrition screening practices survey was developed and sent to members of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, the Council for Pediatric Nutrition Professionals and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Pediatric Nutrition Practice Group. Respondents represented 113 pediatric hospitals in the United States and six in Canada, of which 94 were inpatient and 59 were outpatient. Nutrition risk screening was completed in 90% inpatient settings, and 63% used a validated screening tool. Nurses performed most malnutrition risk screens in the inpatient setting. Nutrition risk screening was reported in 51% of outpatient settings, with a validated screening tool being used in 53%. Measured anthropometrics were used in 78% of inpatient settings, whereas 45% used verbally reported anthropometrics. Measured anthropometrics were used in 97% outpatient settings. Nutrition risk screening was completed in the electronic health record in 80% inpatient settings and 81% outpatient settings. Electronic health record positive screen generated an automatic referral in 80% of inpatient and 45% of outpatient settings. In this sample of pediatric healthcare organizations, the results demonstrate variation in pediatric malnutrition risk screening in North America. These inconsistencies justify the need to standardize pediatric malnutrition risk screening using validated pediatric tools and allocate resources to perform screening.

Analyzing nutrition risks and blood biomarkers in hospitalized patients with tuberculosis: Insights from a 2020 hospital-based study.

There exists a bidirectional relationship between tuberculosis (TB) and nutrition, wherein they mutually influence and interact causally. However, current guidance for providing nutrition support to individuals diagnosed with TB remains inadequate, leading to a significant gap in comprehensive patient care. This study aims to assess the nutrition status of patients with TB and endeavors to provide insights into early nutrition interventions for individuals vulnerable to TB-associated malnutrition. Data from 2204 newly admitted patients at Beijing Chest Hospital in 2020 were collected, with 1735 patients with confirmed TB aged ≥18 years after exclusions. Patient data, encompassing diagnosis and results from routine blood tests and biochemical analyses conducted on the day after admission, were gathered using the electronic medical records system. Nutrition risk screening was conducted using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002) tool, and questionnaire-based assessments were administered. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software. Among 1735 patients with TB, the occurrence rate of nutrition risk was 74.58%. Factors such as age ≥65 years, sputum smear positivity for TB, and concurrent illnesses significantly increased the occurrence rate of nutrition risk. Nutrition risk among patients with TB exhibited negative correlations with parameters such as body weight, hemoglobin, and serum albumin level while showing positive correlations with white blood cell count and C-reactive protein, among others. The occurrence rate of nutrition risk among patients with TB at Beijing Chest Hospital was notably high, particularly among older individuals, those with sputum smear positivity, and those with concurrent illnesses.

Pediatric oncology nutritional practices in high-income countries: A survey from the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP).

Optimal nutrition in pediatric oncology can influence cancer-related outcomes. To establish an understanding of nutrition practice and perceptions of best practice, we queried nutrition providers practicing in pediatric oncology care centers in high-income countries. An electronic, multidisciplinary, cross-sectional survey of nutrition practices was conducted among pediatric oncology nutrition practitioners. Final analysis included 110 surveys from 71 unique institutions and included practitioners from Europe, the United States, Canada, Australia/New Zealand, South America, and the Middle East/Asia. The majority of institutions (97%) reported having dietitians; 72% had designated oncology dietitians. Approximately half of the practitioners (47%) reported feeling their institutions were inadequately staffed. The majority (78%) of institutions completed nutrition risk screening, but there was no consensus on specific screening practices. Half (50%) of the institutions that screened for nutrition risk did so in both inpatient and outpatient settings. The majority (80%) of institutions completed a nutrition assessment close to the time of diagnosis. Those that did not cite lack of staff and/or lack of time, lack of standardized approach, and consult only level of nutritional care as primary barriers. The most common topic of nutrition education provided to patients/families was nutrition-related symptom management (68%). While most institutions reported having pediatric oncology dietitians, we found a lack of standardized practice and perceived inadequate staffing. In addition, what providers perceived to be best practice did not always align with day-to-day clinical practice. Ongoing efforts are needed to develop evidence-based guidelines, including staffing recommendations, to support specialized care in this population.

Achieving The Nutritional Goal Of Burn Patients In A Referral Hospital In The Northern Region Of Brazil

Background: Burns represent a significant health challenge, not only due to the pain and suffering they cause, but also due to metabolic complications. Oral nutritional therapy is a powerful tool in the recovery of these patients, as the burn requires double the energy demands. Therefore, achieving the nutritional goal in burn patients should be considered a priority in clinical management. Materials and Methods: Patients admitted to the Burn Treatment Center at a reference hospital in the North region were evaluated. For nutritional diagnosis, the gold standard tools for nutritional risk analysis were applied, Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002) for adults and Screening Tool for Risk on Nutritional Status and Growth (Strongkids, 2012) for children. These are validated low-cost and non-invasive methods. Monitoring the achievement of VET and protein was carried out through food records and the percentages achieved in accordance with the prescribed calories and proteins were calculated. Results: 22 adult patients were evaluated. Of these, 15 men and 7 women, with an average age of 35.8 years. The assessment revealed 7% malnourished, 67% eutrophic, 33% obese and 13% obese. Adults averaged 2026 cal/day with 112% VET attainment and 90g protein with 125% intake. It is worth highlighting the joint action of nutrition professionals with the prescription of hypercaloric and hyperprotein preparations to adapt to the needs recommended for burn patients, in addition to Oral Nutritional Therapy (ONT), with an increase of 600cal/day and 40g of proteins. The use of hypercaloric and hyperprotein supplementation in burn patients is a strong ally in diet therapy, given the catabolic state and high risk of depletion. Among the children's audience, 7 children were served: 4 boys and 3 girls, an average age of 4.4 years. The nutritional diagnosis showed 85% in eutrophy, and 15% in nutritional risk. The VET of this group was on average 1215 cal and 39g of protein. Children achieved an average of 142% of daily VET and 175% of protein needs. To this end, 85% used TNO, accounting for 300 cal and 7.6 g of additional protein to the oral diet. Conclusion: Achieving the nutritional goals prescribed for burn patients has a significant impact on the meffectiveness of treatment

Agreement between nutritional risk screening and glim diagnosis of malnutrition in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients

Agreement between nutritional risk screening and glim diagnosis of malnutrition in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients

Comparative validation of the nutriscore and nutrition risk screening (NRS-2002) tools in the outpatient oncology setting: a single center study

Comparative validation of the nutriscore and nutrition risk screening (NRS-2002) tools in the outpatient oncology setting: a single center study

Falls and malnutrition are associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis.

Hospitalized patients with end-stage liver disease are at risk of malnutrition, reduced body function, and cognitive impairment due to HE. This combination may have an impact on in-hospital falls and mortality. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the risk of falls and to analyze the consequences regarding in-hospital mortality. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized with liver cirrhosis between 2017 and 2019 at the Department of Gastroenterology at the University Hospital Frankfurt. Clinical data, laboratory work, and follow-up data were analyzed. Factors associated with the risk of falls and in-hospital mortality were calculated using a mixed effect poisson regression model and competing risk time-to-event analyses. Falls occurred with an incidence of 4% (80/1985), including 44 injurious falls with an incidence rate of 0.00005/100 patient-days (95% CI: 0.00001-0.00022). In the multivariate analysis malnutrition (incidence risk ratio: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.04-3.04) and implanted TIPS (incidence risk ratio: 20.09, 95% CI: 10.1-40.1) were independently associated with the risk of falling. In a total of 21/80 (26.25%) hospitalizations, patients with a documented fall died during their hospital stay versus 160/1905 (8.4%) deaths in hospitalizations without in-hospital fall. Multivariable analysis revealed as significant clinical predictors for in-hospital mortality a Nutritional Risk Screening ≥2 (HR 1.79, 95% CI: 1.32-2.4), a falling incident during hospitalization (HR 3.50, 95% CI: 2.04-6.0), high MELD, and admission for infections. Malnutrition and TIPS are associated with falls in hospitalized patients with liver cirrhosis. The in-hospital mortality rate of patients with cirrhosis with falls is high. Specific attention and measures to ameliorate these risks are warranted.

Nutritional support after hospital discharge reduces long-term mortality in patients after gastric cancer surgery: secondary analysis of a prospective randomized trial

Background & aimsNutritional support after hospital discharge was found to enhance the nutritional condition of patients after cancer surgery. However, the effect of nutritional support after hospital discharge in patients after cancer surgery on long-term clinical outcomes is controversial. We aimed to investigate the effect of nutritional support after hospital discharge on long-term clinical outcomes in patients after gastric cancer surgery. MethodsThis study conducted a secondary analysis on individuals at nutritional risk who underwent gastric cancer surgery included in a randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received oral nutritional supplements combined with dietary advice, and the control group received dietary advice alone. The long-term mortality (primary outcome) and other clinical outcomes were compared between groups. ResultsIn total, 321 patients were included in this analysis, with a median follow-up duration of 60.5 months. According to the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), the presence of nutritional risk was found to be a significant predictor of death. This association remained independent even after adjusting for age, sex, comorbidity, and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (AJCC). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality increased by 1.30 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.60, P= 0.016] for each additional point rise in NRS. During the follow-up, a total of 64 individuals (39.5%) in the intervention group and 81 patients (50.9%) in the control group died. Consequently, the adjusted HR for mortality between two groups was 0.69 (95% CI 0.50-0.96, P=0.026). The results of interaction tests did not yield statistically significant variations in fatality rates through the age, sex, comorbidity, NRS, and AJCC stage subgroups. Nutritional support after hospital discharge significantly improved handgrip strength (adjusted coefficient 5.05, 95% CI 3.01-7.08, P=0.000) among other functional outcomes. ConclusionsNutritional support after hospital discharge reduced long-term mortality and improved handgrip strength among patients at nutritional risk after gastric cancer surgery. The current investigation provides the guarantee of nutritional support after hospital discharge for patients after surgery in cancer management guidelines.