The accuracy of a straight-line segmentation approximation to a series of helicoidal vortices is considered. The problem is examined for different values of the helical pitch, the number of wake turns, and the wake skew angle. Results documenting both the accuracy and the relative errors of the discretized helical vortex and a vortex ring are compared. It is found that with sufficiently small segments, straight-line segmentation of both the vortex ring and of the helical vortex give at least a second-order accurate reconstruction of the induced velocity field. It is shown that the vortex ring can be viewed as a special case of a helical vortex as its pitch tends to zero. Based on the magnitude of the errors found for the two cases, a vortex ring is shown to be a more stringent test case than a helical vortex when the straight-line segmentation approach is used. The accuracy of the induced velocity field when a skewed helix is represented by straight-line segmentation is shown to be second-order accurate for various combinations of helical pitch and wake skew angle. A comparison with the unskewed helical vortex reveals that the errors in the induced velocity field are almost the same in the two cases. Nomenclature a = empirical constant for wake expansion E =L egendre’s elliptic integral of the second kind K =L egendre’s elliptic integral of the first kind L 2 norm = second norm of the error vector M = number of divisions per revolution of helical wake N = number of turns in the helix N f = number of vortex filaments in the helix p = helical pitch (distance between adjacent filaments normalized by radius) R = rotor radius or radius of vortex ring, m
Read full abstract