Number Of Spontaneous Movements Research Articles

The effects of lactulose on constipation in patients with Parkinson's disease: An exploratory pilot study

IntroductionConstipation is one of the most common non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) and is associated with reduced quality of life in patients with PD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of lactulose on defecation status in patients with PD. MethodsIn this open-label, single-center, exploratory pilot study, twenty-nine patients with PD received lactulose for three weeks for the treatment of constipation. The primary endpoint was the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs). The secondary endpoints were stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale [BSFS]) and the number of rescue laxatives used. ResultsTwenty-five patients with PD completed the study. The number of SBMs recorded during the lactulose intervention period was significantly increased compared with that recorded during the pre-intervention period. During the intervention period, the BSFS scores of the patients increased significantly, whereas the number of rescue laxatives they used decreased significantly. No serious adverse events were observed during the study period. Lactulose was well-tolerated. ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that lactulose may be effective in improving defecation status in patients with PD. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effects of lactulose on constipation in patients with PD.

Naloxegol (Movantik®) Provides Rapid and Sustained Improvement of Opioid-Induced Constipation Symptoms Irrespective of Opioid Dose

AimNaloxegol (Movantik), an oral peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist has demonstrated rapid relief of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic non-cancer pain in two phase 3 trials (KODIAC 4/5; NCT01309841/NCT01323790). This analysis aims to characterize the OIC symptom burden and evaluate the efficacy of naloxegol in treating symptoms of OIC based on daily opioid dosages. This is the first naloxegol analysis based on a lower opioid dose cutoff of 100 MEU/day. MethodsData were pooled from the KODIAC 4/5 intent-to-treat populations (N=1337). Subjects treated with placebo (PBO) and naloxegol (12.5mg, 25mg) QD were evaluated based on opioid dose ranges (lower dose, ≤100mg; higher dose, >100mg MEU/day). OIC symptoms assessed include number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM/wk), complete evacuation (CSBM), straining (scale 1=not at all, 5=extreme) and stool consistency (Bristol Stool Scale: 1=hard, 7=watery). ResultsBaseline OIC symptom burden (SBM/wk, CSBM/wk, straining, stool consistency) was similar between lower (n=764) and higher (n=567) opioid dose subgroups. Naloxegol (12.5mg, 25mg) provided significant improvement vs PBO in SBMs/wk in the lower and higher opioid dose subgroups; ≤100 MEU (mean SBM/wk: 2.41, 2.91 vs 1.99, respectively; p<0.05) and ˃100 MEU (mean SBM/wk: 2.81, 3.53 vs 2.05, respectively; p< 0.05). A significant improvement in CSBMs/wk vs PBO was demonstrated in the lower dose subgroup for naloxegol 25mg (mean CSBM/wk: 1.48, 1.97 vs 1.38; p=0.54 and p<0.05, respectively) and in the higher dose subgroup for both naloxegol regimens (mean CSBM/wk: 1.90, 2.36 vs 1.20, respectively; p<0.05). In both dose subgroups, rapid symptom improvement in SBM, CSBM and stool consistency were seen within the first week with naloxegol (p<0.05). ConclusionsRegardless of opioid dose, naloxegol (12.5mg, 25mg) provided rapid and sustained improvement of clinically relevant OIC symptoms. These data suggest that all patients should routinely be assessed for OIC, as lower opioid doses often induce constipation.

Sustained ameliorating effects and autonomic mechanisms of transcutaneous electrical acustimulation at ST36 in patients with chronic constipation.

The treatment of chronic constipation is still a great challenge in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and sustained effects of transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (TEA) at acupoint ST36 on the treatment of chronic constipation and explore possible underlying mechanisms. Forty-four patients with chronic constipation were recruited and randomly assigned to a TEA group or sham-TEA group. A bowel diary was recorded by the patients. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptom (PAC-SYM) and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) questionnaires were administered during each visit. Anal and rectal functions were evaluated with anorectal manometry. Autonomic functions were assessed by the special analysis of heart rate variability derived from the ECG recording. Compared with sham-TEA, 2-week TEA treatment significantly increased the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) (5.64 ± 0.54 vs. 2.82 ± 0.36, P < 0.001) and lowered the total scores of PAC-SYM (0.90 ± 0.14 vs. 1.35 ± 0.13, P < 0.001) and PAC-QoL (0.89 ± 0.13 vs. 1.32 ± 0.14, P < 0.05). TEA improved symptoms, as reflected by a reduction in the straining (P < 0.001), the incomplete defecation (P < 0.05), the frequency of emergency drug use (P < 0.05), the days of abdominal distension (P < 0.01) and an increase in intestinal satisfaction (P < 0.01). Interestingly, the effects of TEA on the improvement of weekly SBMs sustained four weeks after the cessation of treatment (P < 0.001). Anorectal manometry indicated that 2-week treatment of TEA lowered the threshold of first sensation (P < 0.05), desire of defecation (P < 0.01) and maximum tolerable volume (P < 0.001) compared with sham-TEA group. TEA also significantly enhanced vagal activity, reflected by high-frequency band of heart rate variability, compared with sham-TEA (57.86 ± 1.83 vs. 48.51 ± 2.04, P < 0.01). TEA ameliorates constipation with sustained effects, which may be mediated via improvement of rectal sensitivity and enhancement of vagal activity. [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [ChiCTR210004267].

Effect of L. reuteri on bowel movements in children aged 6months to 4 years: A double-blind randomized controlled trial.

Chronic constipation is common in children and often requires prolonged laxative treatment. Preliminary studies suggest that the probiotic Limosilactobacillus reuteri (L. reuteri) may be useful in treating constipation in children, but these preliminary results need to be replicated. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of L. reuteri in infants and young children with chronic functional constipation. A prospective double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 5 pediatric departments in France between June 2017 and June 2021. In all, 49 patients-ages 6 months to 4 years, and suffering from chronic constipation per Rome IV criteria-were randomly allocated to the test and control groups. For 4 weeks, all were orally administered 5 daily drops of the test (L. reuteri DSM 17938 at 108 colony-forming units per day) or control (placebo) treatment, respectively. Participants were clinically assessed at 4 and 8 weeks. Parents were asked to daily record the number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs), stool consistency, and the use of any additional laxatives. Informed consent was obtained from parents of all recruited patients, and the study was approved by both an ethics committee and the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety (ANSM). The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03030664). The change in SBMs relative to baseline was greater in the control group at week 4 (control: 0.27 ± 0.5; test: 0.23 ± 0.5; P = 0.01) and in the test group at week 8 (control: 0.26 ± 0.4; test: 0.22 ± 0.5; P = 0.03). At week 4, the groups did not differ in number of responders (≥3 stools per week, with no non-retentive fecal incontinence), use of rescue medication, scoring of pain during defecation (Faces Pain Scale-Revised), or stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale). This double-blind randomized controlled trial did not confirm the efficacy of L. reuteri for treatment of chronic functional constipation in young children.

Risk factors for opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: a single-institution, retrospective analysis.

To identify risk factors for opioid-induced constipation (OIC). This study retrospectively analyzed 175 advanced cancer patients who were receiving pain treatment with opioids and were newly prescribed laxatives for OIC at Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital between November 2016 and June 2021. For the regression analysis of factors associated with OIC, variables were extracted manually from clinical records. The effect of newly prescribed laxatives for OIC was evaluated as "effective" in cases where the number of spontaneous bowel movements increased at least once in the first 3days. The OIC was defined based on Rome IV diagnostic criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for OIC. Optimal cutoff thresholds were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Values of P < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered significant. Significant factors identified included body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.141, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.027-0.733; P = 0.020), chemotherapy with taxane within 1month of evaluation of laxative effect (OR = 0.255, 95% CI = 0.068-0.958; P = 0.043), use of naldemedine (OR = 2.791, 95% CI = 1.220-6.385; P = 0.015), and addition or switching due to insufficient prior laxatives (OR = 0.339, 95% CI = 0.143-0.800; P = 0.014). High BMI, chemotherapy including a taxane within 1month of evaluation of laxative effect, no use of naldemedine, and addition or switching due to insufficient prior laxatives were identified as risk factors for OIC in advanced cancer patients with cancer pain.

Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Acting μ-Opioid Receptor Antagonist (PAMORAs) for the Management of Patients With Opioid-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review.

In treating chronic and acute pain, opioids are widely used. Although they do provide analgesia, their usage does come with adverse events (AEs). One of the most burdensome is opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, and more specifically opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The pathogenesis of these AEs is well known as the consequence of the action of opioids on m-receptors in the enteric nervous system. In recent years, medicines counteracting this specific action at the receptors have been registered for clinical use: the peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). The knowledge of their comparative efficacy and tolerability is very important for physicians and patients in opioid therapy. This systematic review of the existing literature on PAMORAs aimed to study the relative clinical advantages and disadvantages.The most important data banks, including “PubMed,” “Embase,” “CT.gov,” “ICTRP” and “CINAHL” were used to find the published material on PAMORAs. The selected publications were examined to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety of the four existing PAMORAs.All of the medications are superior to placebo in reducing OIC. There are few published data on alvimopan used to treat OIC, and it is only indicated for the treatment of post-abdominal surgery ileus. Methylnaltrexone is studied mainly in its subcutaneous (SC) formulation. When used in its oral formulation, it seems more rapid than naloxegol and placebo in the reduction of OIC. Naldemedine is able to produce more spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) when compared to alvimopan and naloxegol.Tolerability was found to be similar for all of them. In particular, they affect the gastrointestinal tract (GI), with flatulence and diarrhea, especially at high dosages. For some of them, nasopharyngitis and abdominal pain were observed as treatment adverse effects (TEAs). Several cardiovascular TEAs were reported after methylnaltrexone use, but it is not clear whether they were consequences of the drug or related to the general conditions of the patients.Considering the existing data, naloxegol and naldemedine seem to be the best choices, with a higher number of spontaneous bowel movements following naldemedine administration.

Bisacodyl: A review of pharmacology and clinical evidence to guide use in clinical practice in patients with constipation.

BackgroundBisacodyl is a member of the diphenylmethane family and is considered to be a stimulant laxative. It has a dual prokinetic and secretory action and needs to be converted into the active metabolite bis‐(p‐hydroxyphenyl)‐pyridyl‐2‐methane (BHPM) in the gut to achieve the desired laxative effect. Bisacodyl acts locally in the large bowel by directly enhancing the motility, reducing transit time, and increasing the water content of the stool. A recent network meta‐analysis concluded that bisacodyl showed similar efficacy to prucalopride, lubiprostone, linaclotide, tegaserod, velusetrag, elobixibat, and sodium picosulfate for the primary endpoint of ≥3 complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM)/week and an increase of ≥1 CSBM/week over baseline. The meta‐analysis also found that bisacodyl may be superior to the other laxatives for the secondary endpoint of change from baseline in the number of spontaneous bowel movements per week in patients with chronic constipation. This observation stimulated the authors to review the available literature on bisacodyl, which has been available on the market since the 1950 s.PurposeThe aim of the current review was to provide an overview of the historic background, structure, function, and mechanism of action of bisacodyl. Additionally, we discuss the important features and studies for bisacodyl to understand its peculiar characteristics and guide its use in clinical practice, but also stimulate research on open questions.

Transcutaneous Electrical Acustimulation Improves Gastrointestinal Disturbances Induced by Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in Patients With Liver Cancers

Gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances occur in patients who receive chemotherapy via transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and could last for an extended period of time in some cases. Antiemetic drugs have a potential risk of developing hepatic failure and are ineffective for delayed nausea and emesis. Transcutaneous electrical acustimulation (TEA) has recently been reported to exert antiemetic and prokinetic effects, but it is unknown whether it has an ameliorating effect on TACE-induced GI disturbances. This study was designed to evaluate effects and mechanisms of noninvasive TEA on GI symptoms in patients treated with TACE. Seventy-four patients with liver cancers (eighteen female; age 63.4 ± 1.1 years) scheduled for TACE were randomized to TEA (n = 37) or sham-TEA (n = 37). TEA was performed via acupoints, ST36 and PC6 using parameters previously optimized for GI motility (1 h, bid) from the postoperative day 0 (POD0) to POD2. Sham-TEA was performed using the same parameters via non-acupoints. Symptom questionnaires were completed daily. The electrogastrogram (EGG) and electrocardiogram (ECG) were recorded in the fasting state for 30 mins to assess gastric slow waves and autonomic functions, respectively, before and after the 3-day treatment. 1) In the acute phase (<24 h), TEA showed no effects on any of GI symptoms, compared with sham-TEA. 2) In the delayed phase (>24 h), TEA, compared with sham-TEA, decreased the percentage of patients who experienced nausea on POD3 (0% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.021), the nausea score on POD3 (p = 0.022), the anorexia score on POD2 (p = 0.040) and POD3 (p = 0.004), and the bloating score (POD1-3: p < 0.01). 3) In comparison with sham-TEA, TEA increased the number of spontaneous bowel movements (p = 0.001) and the Bristol score of the first stool (p = 0.014) and decreased the number of patients with the use of laxatives (p = 0.022). 4) Physiologically, the 3-day TEA but not sham-TEA increased the percentage of normal gastric slow waves (p < 0.001) and vagal activity (p = 0.006). The vagal activity was negatively correlated with the anorexia score (r = -0.267, p = 0.026). It was found that the sympathovagal ratio and tumor size>5 cm were independent risk factors predicting the occurrence of nausea in patients after TACE. TEA improves major TACE-induced GI disturbances in the delayed phase, including nausea, bloating, impaired gastric pace-making activity, and constipation in patients with liver cancers via the autonomic pathway.

Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan (OIC-J study): a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with lung cancer.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the opioid-induced constipation burden in the subgroup of patients with lung cancer who participated in the observational Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Cancer Pain in Japan (OIC-J) study.MethodsThe prospective, observational study, OIC-J, included 212 patients with various tumour types, 33% of whom had lung cancer. The incidence of opioid-induced constipation was evaluated using several diagnostic criteria, as well as the physician’s diagnosis and patient’s subjective assessment. Following initiation of opioids, patients recorded details of bowel movements (i.e. date/time, Bristol Stool Scale form, sensations of incomplete evacuation or anorectal obstruction/blockage and degree of straining) in a diary for 2 weeks. Relationships between patient characteristics and opioid-induced constipation onset and effects of opioid-induced constipation on quality of life were explored.ResultsIn total, 69 patients were included in this post hoc analysis. The incidence of opioid-induced constipation varied (39.1–59.1%) depending on which diagnostic criteria was used. Diagnostic criteria that included a quality component or a patient’s feeling of bowel movement as an evaluation item (i.e. Rome IV, physician’s diagnosis, Bowel Function Index, patient’s assessment) showed higher incidences of opioid-induced constipation than recording the number of spontaneous bowel movements alone. Opioid-induced constipation occurred rapidly after initiating opioids and had a significant impact on Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms total score (P = 0.0031). Patient baseline characteristics did not appear to be predictive of opioid-induced constipation onset.ConclusionsIn patients with lung cancer, opioid-induced constipation can occur quickly after initiating opioids and can negatively impact quality of life. Early management of opioid-induced constipation, with a focus on quality-of-life improvement and patient’s assessments of bowel movements, is important for these patients.

Real-World Comparison of Elobixibat and Lubiprostone Treatment in Patients with Chronic Constipation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Introduction: Elobixibat is a new laxative, but its efficacy and adverse events (AEs) are insufficiently examined compared with those of other laxatives. Hence, by propensity score (PS) matching, we compared the effects and AEs between elobixibat and lubiprostone. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 1,887 Japanese patients with chronic constipation (CC) treated at our hospital between October 2013 and April 2020. Enrolled patients were divided into three treatment groups, namely, elobixibat (10 mg daily) (E10 group, n = 293), lubiprostone (24 μg daily) (L24 group, n = 772), and lubiprostone (48 μg daily) (L48 group, n = 822), as their first treatment. We then investigated the changes on the weekly average number of spontaneous bowel movements, stool consistency scores (SCSs), and AEs starting from the baseline until the end of the 2-week treatment. To adjust for patients’ background, we performed one-to-one nearest neighbor matching without replacement between elobixibat- and lubiprostone-treated patients according to the individual estimated PSs. Results: After treatment, for SCSs, both the L24 and L48 groups significantly improved compared with the E10 group (p < 0.05), but their stools were soft (Bristol Stool Form Scale: 4.8). Notably, the E10 group had less frequent AEs than the L24 group (26 [9.0%] vs. 43 [14.8%], p = 0.03). Particularly, nausea was significantly less in the E10 group than that in the L48 group (2 [0.7%] vs. 7 [2.4%], p = 0.01). Conclusion: Elobixibat is a beneficial drug for patients with mildly symptomatic CC and is safe to use, given its few AEs.

Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan (OIC-J study): a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with gastrointestinal cancer

BackgroundConstipation is a common side effect of opioid therapy. An observational study of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in Japanese patients with cancer (OIC-J) included 212 patients with various tumor types. This post hoc analysis of OIC-J evaluated a subgroup of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.MethodsPatients were aged ≥ 20 years, starting strong opioid therapy, had an ECOG PS of ≤ 2, and must have had ≥ 3 bowel movements during the week before enrollment. OIC was evaluated for 2 weeks after opioid initiation using the Rome IV diagnostic criteria for colorectal disorders, as well as physician’s diagnosis, number of spontaneous bowel movements, Bowel Function Index score, and patient’s self-assessment. Relationships between baseline characteristics and OIC incidence, and the effects of OIC on quality of life (QOL) were also explored.ResultsFifty patients from OIC-J who had GI cancer [colon (50%), stomach (28%), and esophageal (22%)] were included. OIC incidence varied by which diagnostic criteria were used (46.0–62.0%) and occurred rapidly after initiating opioid therapy. The use of prophylactic laxatives reduced the overall incidence rate of OIC from 71.0% to 47.4%. No baseline characteristics, except comorbidities, were associated with OIC incidence. Change from baseline to day 15 in PAC-SYM total score was significantly greater for patients with OIC versus those without OIC (0.188 versus −0.362; P = 0.0011).ConclusionsThis post hoc analysis suggests that OIC occurs rapidly in patients with GI cancer after initiating opioid therapy, and negatively impacts QOL. Early and effective intervention strategies may be particularly useful in this group.Additional InformationCoauthor Makio Gamoh is deceased.

Probiotics for Constipation in Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study.

To determine whether probiotics are effective for constipation, a common and often difficult-to-treat problem, in Parkinson disease (PD). In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center trial, 280 patients with PD were screened, and 72 eligible patients were block-randomized (1:1) to receive either multistrain probiotics capsules (n = 34) or identical-appearing placebo (n = 38), for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the average number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM) per week during the last 2 weeks of intervention compared with the 2-week preintervention phase, recorded by daily stool diary. Secondary outcome measures included changes in stool consistency, constipation severity score, and quality of life related to constipation. Satisfaction with intervention received was assessed. Change in levels of fecal calprotectin, a marker of intestinal inflammation, was an exploratory outcome. SBM increased by 1.0 ± 1.2 per week after treatment with probiotics and decreased by 0.3 ± 1.0 per week in the placebo group (mean difference 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.8-1.8, p < 0.001). Significant improvements were also seen for secondary outcomes after correction for multiple comparisons, including stool consistency (p = 0.009) and quality of life related to constipation (p = 0.001). In the treatment group, 65.6% reported satisfaction with the intervention vs only 21.6% in the placebo group (p < 0.001). One patient (2.9%) in the treatment group withdrew due to a nonserious adverse event. Fecal calprotectin did not change significantly during the study. Multistrain probiotics treatment was effective for constipation in PD. Further studies are needed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of probiotics in PD, as well as their mechanisms of action. NCT03377322. This study provides Class I evidence that, for people with PD, multistrain probiotics significantly increased the average number of SBM per week.

Comparative Efficacy of Linaclotide Versus Other Oral Constipation Treatments in Chronic Constipation: a Network Meta-analysis

This systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) indirectly compared the Japanese standard dose of linaclotide 500 μg with other oral chronic constipation (CC) treatments. PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, Ichushi-Web, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials of 43 oral drugs approved globally for CC, including irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The mean difference (95% credible interval) in change from baseline in weekly number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBM) was compared between linaclotide 500 μg (unapproved in OIC) and other treatments using Bayesian methodology. Fifty-two publications (54 trials) involving 47 treatments (16 drugs, different doses of the same drug treated as different treatments) were included in the NMA. Despite including various drugs/doses, for the mean difference in weekly SBM change, linaclotide 500 μg was statistically significantly more efficacious than other drugs/doses (vs 500 μg linaclotide) including the following: placebo (− 1.907; − 2.568, − 1.237); lubiprostone 16 μg (− 2.090; − 3.226, − 0.968); methylnaltrexone 150 mg (− 1.807; − 3.126, − 0.491), 300 mg (− 1.411; − 2.722, − 0.096), and 450 mg (− 1.405; − 2.708, − 0.097); naloxegol 5 mg (− 2.074; − 4.001, − 0.131) and 12.5 mg (− 1.329; − 2.347, − 0.318); and tegaserod 4 mg (− 1.133; − 2.059, − 0.207) and 12 mg (− 1.024; − 1.822, −0.228), and statistically significantly less effective than linaclotide 600 μg non-approved dose (1.159; 0.123, 2.199) and bisacodyl 10 mg (2.979; 1.723, 4.233). These findings provide relative efficacy data for linaclotide 500 μg vs other constipation drugs/doses regarding improving weekly SBM in CC and IBS-C and may inform clinical decision-making for constipation treatments.

Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of treatments for opioid-induced constipation.

When opioid-induced constipation is treated with centrally acting opioid antagonists, there may be opioid withdrawal or aggravation of pain due to inhibition of μ-opioid analgesia. This led to the development of peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). To evaluate the efficacy of available PAMORAs and other approved or experimental treatments for relieving constipation in patients with opioid-induced constipation, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and EBM Reviews Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was completed in July 2019 for randomised trials compared to placebo. FDA approved doses or highest studied dose was evaluated. Efficacy was based on diverse endpoints, including continuous variables (the bowel function index, number of spontaneous bowel movements and stool consistency based on Bristol Stool Form Scale), or responder analysis (combination of >3 spontaneous bowel movements or complete spontaneous bowel movements plus 1 spontaneous bowel movement or complete spontaneous bowel movements, respectively, over baseline [so-called FDA endpoints]). Adverse effects evaluated included central opioid withdrawal, serious adverse events, abdominal pain and diarrhoea. We included 35 trials at low risk of bias enrolling 13566 patients. All PAMORAs demonstrated efficacy on diverse patient response endpoints. There was greater efficacy with approved doses of the PAMORAs (methylnaltrexone, naloxegol and naldemidine), with lower efficacy or lower efficacy and greater adverse effects with combination oxycodone with naloxone, lubiprostone and linaclotide. Therapeutic response in opioid-induced constipation is best achieved with the PAMORAs, methylnaltrexone, naloxegol and naldemidine, which are associated with low risk of serious adverse events.

Elobixibat alleviates chronic constipation in hemodialysis patients: a questionnaire-based study

BackgroundHemodialysis patients are prone to constipation, which can adversely affect their quality of life (QOL). Elobixibat, a highly selective inhibitor of the ileal bile acid transporter, can increase the bile acid level in the colon and, subsequently, enhance colonic motility and secretion. In hemodialysis patients with chronic constipation, it may have a novel action mechanism. However, the effect of elobixibat on such patients’ QOL had not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of elobixibat on the QOL of hemodialysis patients with chronic constipation.MethodsThis was a multicenter, observational study that used the Japanese version of the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire on 27 patients (18 men and nine women, age range 47–90 years), who satisfied the Rome 3 diagnostic criteria for functional constipation and were already taking other drugs for constipation. These patients were administered elobixibat 10 mg/day and were asked to respond to the PAC-QOL questionnaire at baseline and after 4 weeks. Bayesian statistics were used to confirm our results.ResultsThe number of spontaneous bowel movements per week increased significantly from 2.6 ± 1.2 to 4.1 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001), and the Bristol Stool Form Scale score significantly improved from 1.9 ± 0.8 to 3.6 ± 0.7 (p < 0.001). The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.95, and the Guttman split-half reliability coefficient was 0.90. There were significant decreases in the physical discomfort scores from 1.94 ± 0.79 to 0.97 ± 0.72 (p < 0.001); psychosocial discomfort from 1.16 ± 0.93 to 0.63 ± 0.58 (p < 0.001); worries/ concerns from 1.84 ± 0.73 to 1.27 ± 0.59 (p < 0.001), and satisfaction from 2.79 ± 0.61 to 1.98 ± 0.77 (p < 0.001). The total PAC-QOL score significantly decreased from 1.83 ± 0.79 to 1.17 ± 0.56 (p < 0.001). Bayesian statistics confirmed the results’ significance.ConclusionsElobixibat reduced the PAC-QOL scores for hemodialysis patients with chronic constipation and improved the patients’ QOL. It may serve as a new option for treating constipation in hemodialysis patients.

Comparative Efficacy of Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Constipation: Quantitative Information for Medication Guidelines.

Quantitative information is scarce with regard to guidelines for currently prescribed medications for constipation. Furthermore, these guidelines do not reflect the differences in the number of bowel movements caused by each drug. In this study, we used a model-based meta-analysis to quantitatively estimate the deviations from the baseline number of spontaneous bowel movements (SBMs) and complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) associated with pharmacotherapy for chronic constipation to bridge the knowledge gap in the guidelines for current medications. A comprehensive survey was conducted using literature databases. In this study, we also included randomized placebo-controlled trials on chronic constipation. Pharmacodynamic models were established to describe the time course of the numbers of SBMs and CSBMs produced by each drug. Data from 20 studies (comprising 9998 participants and 8 drugs) were used to build this model. The results showed that bisacodyl had the greatest effect on increasing the frequency of bowel movements, whereas plecanatide yielded the lowest increase in the number of SBMs and CSBMs. After eliminating the placebo effect, the maximal increase in bowel movement frequency associated with bisacodyl was 6.8 for SBMs (95% confidence interval: 6.1-7.6) and 4.7 for CSBMs (95% confidence interval: 4.3-5.1) per week. These numbers are ∼4 times higher than the number of bowel movements produced by plecanatide. The change in the frequency of SBMs and CSBMs for other drugs, such as sodium picosulfate, velusetrag, linaclotide, elobixibat, lubiprostone, and prucalopride, was similar. The highest increases in the frequency of SBM and CSBM were 2.5 to 4 and 1 to 2.1 per week, respectively. Bisacodyl had the most noticeable loss of efficacy between week 1 and week 4; it reduced the frequencies of SBMs and CSBMs by 2.3 and 2.2, respectively. By contrast, the changes in the frequencies of SBMs and CSBMs were not as great with other drugs. The data provided in this study may be a valuable supplement to the medication guidelines for the treatment of chronic constipation.

Lubiprostone in the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation: an update on health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes.

Chronic idiopathic constipation, if inadequately treated, can be bothersome with a detrimental effect on patients’ quality of life (QOL). This may also result in frequent health care visits, increasing the burden of this ailment’s medical cost. Management strategies, focused on lifestyle changes, include increased exercise, a high-fiber diet, and toilet training. Pharmacologic options include fiber supplementation, laxatives, serotonergic agents, and prosecretory agents such as lubiprostone. In this review, we were able to conclude that lubiprostone, when used for chronic idiopathic constipation, has a significantly beneficial effect on both patients’ symptoms and their QOL. In multiple randomized controlled trials, it has been found to have increased the number of spontaneous bowel movements at different time endpoints. Corresponding improvements were also observed for abdominal bloating, discomfort, stool frequency, and straining symptoms among patients.

Effect of acupuncture for constipation after ischemic stroke: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundConstipation is a common complication after stroke that can severely influence a patient’s quality of life and rehabilitation. Treatments for constipation after stroke vary. Acupuncture may improve spontaneous bowel movements, quality of life, and clinical symptoms. The study seeks to assess the preliminary effects of acupuncture on constipation after an ischemic stroke.Methods/designThis is a prospective randomized controlled pilot trial design in which 120 eligible patients will be randomly allocated to one of three groups. The acupuncture group (n = 40) will receive acupuncture and routine care, the medication group (n = 40) will receive mosapride citrate and routine care, and the control group (n = 40) will receive only routine care for ischemic stroke. Patients will be recruited 2 weeks to 6 months after stroke onset and will receive the intervention continuously over 4 weeks, with a follow-up period of 4 additional weeks. Adverse events will be recorded to assess the safety and tolerability of acupuncture for constipation after an ischemic stroke. The primary outcome will be the change in the weekly mean number of complete spontaneous bowel movements. Secondary outcomes will include any change in the weekly mean number of spontaneous bowel movements, mean stool consistency scores, mean straining scores during defecation, and frequency of laxative use. All outcome measures will be assessed at inception, after the intervention (4 weeks), and at the follow-up (8 weeks).DiscussionThis study will provide evidence of the preliminary effects and inform future sample size calculations for studies of acupuncture for constipation following an ischemic stroke. These findings will inform subsequent large-scale randomized controlled trials.Trial registrationISRCTN, 22214747. Registered on 17 August 2015.

Safety and efficacy of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 inhibitor mizagliflozin for functional constipation: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase 2 trial

Mizagliflozin is a novel oral sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) inhibitor that increases luminal glucose and water. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of mizagliflozin in patients with functional constipation. In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind phase 2 trial at 32 hospitals and community outpatient clinics in Japan, we enrolled patients with functional constipation or constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, aged 20 years or older. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), by use of an independent centralised registration system and dynamic allocation method, to receive mizagliflozin 5 mg, mizagliflozin 10 mg, or placebo, orally once daily for 4 weeks. Patients, investigators, staff, and the sponsor were blinded to the group assignments. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in the number of spontaneous bowel movements per week after 1 week. Efficacy analysis was done in all patients except those who deviated from good clinical practice, did not receive at least one dose of the study drug, withdrew before starting treatment, were ineligible, or for whom the primary outcome could not be assessed, and safety was assessed in all patients except those who deviated from good clinical practice, who did not receive the study drug, or who withdrew before receiving treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02281630, and is completed. Between Oct 15, 2014, and March 7, 2015, 258 patients with functional constipation were randomly assigned: 86 patients per group. Two patients from the placebo group and three from the 10 mg mizagliflozin group were excluded because the primary outcome could not be assessed, and one patient from the 5 mg mizagliflozin group was excluded for not receiving the study drug; therefore 84 patients in the placebo group, 85 in the 5 mg mizagliflozin group, and 83 in the 10 mg mizagliflozin group were included in the full analysis population. Mean change from baseline in the number of spontaneous bowel movements per week after 1 week with mizagliflozin 5 mg (3·85 [SD 3·96]) and mizagliflozin 10 mg (5·85 [6·01]) was significantly greater than those in the placebo group (1·80 [1·80]; p<0·0001 for both comparisons). The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (one [1%] of 86 patients in the placebo group, seven [8%] of 85 on mizagliflozin 5 mg, and five [6%] of 86 on mizagliflozin 10 mg), diarrhoea (none on placebo, four [5%] patients on mizagliflozin 5 mg, and eight [9%] on mizagliflozin 10 mg), and abdominal distention (three [3%] on placebo, four [5%] on mizagliflozin 5 mg, and seven [8%] on mizagliflozin 10 mg). Only diarrhoea and abdominal distention were deemed to be related to mizagliflozin treatment, whereas nasophanyngitis might not be related to mizagliflozin treatment, on the basis of clinical evaluation. The SGLT1 inhibitor mizagliflozin showed favourable efficacy and tolerability at 5 mg and 10 mg doses in patients with functional constipation, providing a potential alternative therapy to available drugs. Kissei Pharmaceutical.

Linaclotide for the treatment of chronic constipation

ABSTRACTIntroduction: Chronic constipation (CC) is a common gastrointestinal disorder with limited treatment options. Linaclotide is a potent peptide agonist of the guanylate cyclase-C receptor. This action activates intracellular conversion of guanosine 5-triphosphate to cyclic guanosine monophosphate resulting in the stimulation of intestinal fluid secretion. Linaclotide is a promising new agent for refractory constipation.Areas covered: All published articles regarding the development, clinical efficacy, and safety of linaclotide in treating CC were reviewed. Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and metabolism of this secretagogue agent were examined. Clinical studies showed that linaclotide increases the number of spontaneous bowel movements and stool consistency scores. Overall, patients reported relief from abdominal discomfort and severity of constipation. Finally, linaclotide has a good safety profile, with diarrhea being the main side effect.Expert opinion: Linaclotide appears to be a well-tolerated and effective agent for patients with CC, and could be effectively combined with other drugs in patients with refractory constipation. However, data on the efficacy and safety of linaclotide in pediatric patients and in opioid-induced constipation are currently limited and more studies need to be undertaken.