This paper describes an experiment aimed at using e-mail to improve the written language skills in German and Spanish of Canadian Foreign Service officers working in various countries. Little literature exists on the use of e-mail in distance learning outside the university environment. There is, however, considerable literature documenting the very high attrition rate in distance-learning courses. The course described in this paper was developed by the Canadian Foreign Service Institute to take into account the published analyses of the reasons for high attrition rates in and for completion of distance-learning courses. Because attrition rates have been found to be much lower when course participants feel that the course will be of direct use to them in their professional life, the author and her colleagues designed the program to require the completion of authentic professional tasks. These tasks were (1) to check the correctness of a text translated into the targe t language; (2) to check the accuracy of a translated text; and (3) to write a number of short texts in the target language, such as a thank-you note, a request for information and a letter making a suggestion. The course aimed to expose the participants to formal language, in the form of official documents, technical language, through linguistic explanations and descriptions of the way the course would function, and informal language, through spontaneous interaction among the participants and with the instructor. A number of pre-course activities were required. These were (1) a pre-test to determine the participant's linguistic level; (2) a questionnaire to evaluate the participant's level of computer skills and (3) a questionnaire aimed at eliciting the participant's attitude towards the use of a computer for word-processing, the use of e-mail for interpersonal communication, the use of e-mail for learning, co-operative learning, and writing in the target language. Initial interest in the course was very high. However, the attrition rate in all groups was also very high. This latter result seems to be attributable in part to the fact that participants were paired and required to correct each other's work. It appears that participants had little interest in correcting other participants' assignments, but would have preferred an opportunity to rework their own in the light of the instructor's comments and corrections. This will be incorporated into future versions of the course. Given the initial high interest, it appears that it is worthwhile to repeat and refine the experiment.