Number Of Major Errors Research Articles

Multicentre Evaluation of the EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (RAST) Extending Analysis to 16-20 Hours Reading Time.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the EUCAST RAST method by extending analysis to 16–20 h reading time and performance with new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. A total of 676 positive blood cultures (BCs) were enrolled. Results at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 16–20 h were interpreted according to bacterial species using EUCAST RAST breakpoints (version 5.1). For species for which no breakpoints were available, tentative breakpoints were used. Categorical agreement with the Microscan microdilution system was analysed. Among the 676 BCs enrolled, 641 were monomicrobial and were included in the analysis. Categorical agreement ranged from 98.9% at 4 h to 99.4% at 16–20 h. The rates of very major errors were 3.3%, 3.7% and 3.4% at 4 h, 6 h and 8 h, respectively, and decreased to 1% at 16–20 h (p < 0.001). The number of major errors was low for each reading time (0.2% and 0.4% at 4 h and 6 h, respectively, and 0.3% at both 8 h and 16–20 h). The proportions of results in the area of technical uncertainty were 9.9%, 5.9%, 5% and 5.2% for readings at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h and 16–20 h, respectively. Tentative breakpoints proposed for Enterobacterales other than E.coli/K.pneumoniae and coagulase-negative staphylococci showed overall performances comparable to those observed for E. coli/K. pneumoniae and S. aureus. In conclusion, EUCAST RAST has been shown to be reliable to determine microbial susceptibility to main antimicrobials, including ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam. A poorer performance was observed for certain species/antimicrobial agent combinations. The better performance observed at 16–20 h compared to the early readings may confer to the method greater potential for antimicrobial de-escalation interventions.

Analysis of Errors on Death Certificate for Trauma Related Death

Purpose: This study was to investigate errors of death certificate (DC) issued for patients with trauma. Methods: A retrospective review for DC issued after death related to trauma at a training hospital trauma center was conducted. Errors on DC were classified into major and minor errors depending on their influence on the process of selecting the cause of death (COD). All errors were compared depending on the place of issue of DC, medical doctors who wrote the DC, and the number of lines filled up for COD of DC. Results: Of a total 140 DCs, average numbers of major and minor errors per DC were 0.8 and 3.7, respectively. There were a total of 2.8 errors for DCs issued at the emergency department (ED) and 5.4 errors for DCs issued beyond ED. The most common major error was more than one COD on a single line for DCs issued at the ED and incompatible casual relation between CODs for DCs issued beyond ED. The number of major errors was 0.5 for emergency physician and 0.8 for trauma surgeon and neurosurgeon. Total errors by the number of lines filled up for COD were the smallest (3.1) for two lines and the largest (6.0) for four lines. Conclusions: Numbers of total errors and major errors on DCs related to trauma only were 4 and 0.8, respectively. As more CODs were written, more errors were found.

The utility of intraoperative navigation of the temporal bone for otolaryngology resident training.

To determine whether image guidance improves dissection quality among residents in the temporal bone lab and to gauge their reactions to its use. Prospective cohort study of nine otolaryngology residents who dissected cadaveric temporal bones with and without image guidance in the temporal bone laboratory. Quality of dissection was measured with the Welling scale. A survey was administered assessing their interactions with the navigation system. There was no significant difference in quality of dissection for the majority of structures or number of major errors with use of image guidance. Dissection quality of the tegmen (4.67 vs. 5.67, P = .034) and sinodural angle (0.83 vs. 1.56, P = .005) was superior in the non-navigation specimens. The majority of residents reported increased confidence with locating several critical anatomic structures and found the system intuitive to use. Nearly all thought it would be helpful in revision cases or for aural atresia. Image guidance did not improve quality of temporal bone dissection or number of major errors in this cohort of residents, but the majority found it intuitive and increased confidence in finding several structures. Navigation systems may play an important adjunctive role in resident education and further work is required to determine its optimal use. NA Laryngoscope, 130:E368-E371, 2020.

The critical influence of the intermediate category on interpretation errors in revised EUCAST and CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing guidelines

Erroneous assignments of clinical isolates to the interpretative categories susceptible, intermediate and resistant can deprive a patient of successful antimicrobial therapy. The rate of major errors (ME) and very major errors (vME) is dependent on: (i) the precision/standard deviation (σ) of the antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) method, (ii) the diameter distributions, (iii) clinical breakpoints, and (iv) the width of the intermediate zone. The European Committee on AST (EUCAST) has abandoned or decreased the intermediate zone for several drug/species combinations. This study focused on the effects of discontinuing the intermediate category on the rate of interpretation errors. In total, 10 341 non-duplicate clinical isolates were included in the study. For susceptibility testing the disc diffusion method was used. Error probabilities were calculated separately for diameter values flanking the interpretative category borders. Error probabilities were then applied to the actual numbers of clinical isolates investigated and expected rates of ME and vME were calculated. Applying EUCAST AST guidelines, significant rates of ME/vME were demonstrated for all drug/species combinations without an intermediate range. Virtually all ME/vME expected were eliminated in CLSI guidelines that retained an intermediate zone. If wild-type and resistant isolates are not clearly separated in susceptibility distributions, the retaining of an intermediate zone will decrease the number of ME and vME. An intermediate zone of 2–3 mm avoids almost all ME/vME for most species/drug combinations depending on diameter distributions. Laboratories should know their epidemiology settings to be able to detect problems of individual species/drug/clinical breakpoint combinations and take measures to improve precision of diameter measurements.

Eficacia de la espectrometría de masas MALDI-TOF en la identificación de bacterias anaerobias

Aim of the studyMALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) is becoming a major resource in the Clinical Microbiology laboratory. Results on some groups of microorganisms are still controversial. We have studied the reliability of MALDI-TOF MS for the identification of anaerobic clinical isolates was studied compared to conventional biochemical methods, with rRNA 16S sequencing being used as a reference when discrepancies arose. Material and methodsA total of 126 anaerobic bacteria clinical isolates were studied by using API20A kits (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France) and MALDI-TOF MS (Autoflex II, Bruker Daltonics, Germany), and using the data library BioTyper 2.0 (Bruker Daltonics, Germany). When discrepancies arose, or MALDI-TOF MS was not able to identify any microorganism, rRNA 16S sequencing was used as the reference standard. ResultsThe biochemical method and MALDI-TOF MS agreed in identifying 60.9% of isolates at species level, and 20.3% of isolates at genus level. Among the 48 discrepancies observed, rRNA 16S sequencing supported MALDI-TOF MS identification, at species level, in 32 isolates (66.7%), and in 8 isolates (16.7%) at genus level. rRNA 16S sequencing supported biochemical identification in only two isolates (4.2%) at species level, and in 26 isolates (54.2%) at genus level. The eight isolates for which MALDI-TOF MS did not manage to identify, or the identification obtained was rejected by sequencing, belonged to species that are still not added to the BioTyper II data library. ConclusionsResults obtained in this study show that, overall, MALDI-TOF MS identification of anaerobic bacteria is more reliable than identification obtained by conventional biochemical methods (24% more correct identifications at species level). The number of major errors (incorrect identification at the genus level) is also 2.5-times lower. Moreover, all the major errors obtained by MALDI-TOF MS were due to the absence of some species in the data library. Thus, when data libraries are more complete, reliability differences between both methods will probably be even higher.

Spirometry: what paper speed?

Controversy still exists regarding the paper speed necessary for accurate measurements from records of maneuvers for forced vital capacity. Twenty-four spirometric wave forms of known characteristics were plotted by a computer at 1, 2, and 3 cm/sec and were measured in random order by 12 experienced readers. We found that all readers made a surprisingly large number of major errors. The speed of the paper was found to be an important determinant for accurately measuring the forced expiratory volume in one second and the mean forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the forced vital capacity. A minimum paper speed of at least 3 cm/sec is important if spirograms are to be accurately measured by hand. Human errors in measurement may be minimized by obtaining results from at least three acceptable curves, by making duplicate reading of curves, and by making use of validated computerized measurement systems.