Number Of Adverse Event Reports Research Articles

Novel insights into post-marketing AEs associated with leuprorelin: A comprehensive analysis utilizing the FAERS database

PurposeThis research focused on meticulously tracking and identifying adverse reactions associated with leuprorelin, a drug prescribed for conditions such as prostate cancer, endometriosis, uterine fibroids, and early-onset puberty. The main objective was to enhance patient safety and offer informed guidance on the appropriate use of this treatment. MethodsFrom the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on a significant number of adverse event reports (AERs) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Data mining with dismutation analysis was conducted to quantify signals associated with adverse events (AEs) related to leuprorelin, utilizing powerful algorithms such as ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM. ResultsA total of 102 positive reaction terms (PT) spanning 24 System Organ Classes (SOCs) were identified from an analysis of 60,709 reports associated with leuprorelin use. Notably, several previously unrecognized adverse reactions were uncovered, including Artificial Menopause, Ovarian Adhesion, Follicular Cystitis, Intercepted product preparation error, among others. These findings underscore the importance of exercising additional vigilance regarding the potential adverse effects of leuprorelin, such as Abscess Sterile, Injection site granuloma, Intercepted medication error, and Bulbospinal muscular atrophy congenital. ConclusionsThis research has successfully uncovered new and unforeseen signals associated with adverse drug reactions (ADRs) following leuprorelin administration. The study provides valuable insights into the intricate connection between ADRs and leuprorelin usage. The results underscore the crucial significance of continuous surveillance and meticulous monitoring to promptly identify and manage AEs, ultimately enhancing patient safety and well-being while undergoing leuprorelin therapy.

Trends in Adverse Event Reporting Before and After the Introduction of the Med Safety App in Nigeria.

Spontaneous reporting of adverse events (AEs) is a mainstay of pharmacovigilance, and an ongoing challenge is how to ensure that more high-quality reports are collected for comprehensive information provision. The Med Safety App, a smartphone-based application, was launched in Nigeria in November 2020 to provide an electronic platform for users to seamlessly report AEs. There has been a paucity of evidence on the use of this application or other mobile applications for reporting adverse drug reactions/AEs following immunization in the Nigerian environment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in adverse event reporting before and after the introduction of the Med Safety App in Nigeria. This was a retrospective, observational study using data from the VigiFlow database to compare adverse event reporting in Nigeria before and after the deployment of the Med Safety App. The baseline period was 1st April 2019to 30th October 2020 and the comparison period was 1st November 2020to 31st May 2022. We used Vigilance Hub, the back-end system for the Med Safety App, to extract data on App downloads and de-identified user statistics. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics, frequencies and proportions. Quality was assessed by assigning a completeness score to each individual case safety report. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test for differences in medians between groups. Following deployment of the App, the Nigerian National Pharmacovigilance Centre recorded an increase in the total number of adverse event reports received in VigiFlow, from 2051 in the baseline period to 18,995 following deployment of the App, with 81.7% of those reported via the Med Safety App. There was a reduction in the proportion of paper-based reporting from 98.4 to 15.7% post-deployment, and direct reporting by consumers increased from 2.7 to 17.6%. Of the 15,526 reports submitted via the App, 15,111 (97.3%) had a completeness score above 70% and 6993 (45%) had a completeness score of 100%. The median completeness score of adverse event reports on the Med Safety App was 6 out of 7. On bivariate analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test, there was an association between means of reporting and completeness score, and this association was significant, with a p value of 0.0001, which may reflect the validation rules that are applied within the App. Deployment of the Med Safety App increased both the number and quality of adverse event reports; however, more awareness and capacity building are needed to strengthen and sustain reporting on the tool by all categories of healthcare professionals and consumers/patients.

Parasitic infections related to anti-type 2 immunity monoclonal antibodies: a disproportionality analysis in the food and drug administration's adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting immunoglobulin E (IgE) [omalizumab], type 2 (T2) cytokine interleukin (IL) 5 [mepolizumab, reslizumab], IL-4 Receptor (R) α [dupilumab], and IL-5R [benralizumab]), improve quality of life in patients with T2-driven inflammatory diseases. However, there is a concern for an increased risk of helminth infections. The aim was to explore safety signals of parasitic infections for omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab, and benralizumab. Methods: Spontaneous reports were used from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 2004 to 2021. Parasitic infections were defined as any type of parasitic infection term obtained from the Standardised Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities® (MedDRA®). Safety signal strength was assessed by the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR). Results: 15,502,908 reports were eligible for analysis. Amongst 175,888 reports for omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, dupilumab, and benralizumab, there were 79 reports on parasitic infections. Median age was55 years (interquartile range 24-63years) and 59.5% were female. Indications were known in 26 (32.9%) reports; 14 (53.8%) biologicals were reportedly prescribed for asthma, 8 (30.7%) for various types of dermatitis, and 2 (7.6%) for urticaria. A safety signal was observed for each biological, except for reslizumab (due to lack of power), with the strongest signal attributed to benralizumab (ROR = 15.7, 95% Confidence Interval: 8.4-29.3). Conclusion: Parasitic infections were disproportionately reported for mAbs targeting IgE, T2 cytokines, or T2 cytokine receptors. While the number of adverse event reports on parasitic infections in the database was relatively low, resulting safety signals were disproportionate and warrant further investigation.

Reported adverse events related to use of hepatitis C virus direct-acting antivirals with opioids: 2017–2021

IntroductionDue to concerns over potential interactions between some hepatitis C direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and opioids, we describe adverse event (AE) reports of concomitant use of opioids and DAAs.MethodsAEs reported (July 28, 2017–December 31, 2021) with the administration of the DAAs glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir, and elbasvir/grazoprevir as suspect products were downloaded from the US Food and Drug Administration AE Reporting System Public Dashboard. The number of AE reports containing opioids (fentanyl, hydrocodone, oxycodone) as co-suspect products/concomitant products were counted and summarized by severity, reporting country and whether an outcome of death was reported. Overdose AEs were counted irrespective of opioid use, and changes over time were assessed.ResultsIn total, 40 AEs were reported for DAAs and concomitant fentanyl use, 25 (62.5%) were in the USA, 35 (87.5%) were considered serious, and 14 (35.0%) resulted in death; and 626 were reported with concomitant oxycodone/hydrocodone use, 596 (95.2%) were in the USA, 296 (47.3%) were considered serious, and 28 (4.5%) resulted in death. There were 196 overdose AEs (32 [16%] deaths) declining from 2018 (N = 56) to 2021 (N = 29).ConclusionsTreating people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who use drugs is key to achieving HCV elimination. Low numbers of DAA AE reports with opioids may provide reassurance to prioritize HCV treatment in this population. These data contribute to evidence supporting the continued scale-up of DAA treatment among people who use drugs to achieve HCV elimination goals.

Identifying Crude Drugs in Kampo Medicines Associated with Drug-Induced Liver Injury Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report Database: A Comprehensive Survey.

The current study aimed to identify the crude drugs associated with drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in 148 Kampo medicines prescribed throughout Japan using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, a large-scale spontaneous reporting system in Japan. First, we tabulated the number of DILI reports from the report-based dataset and the background information from the patient-based dataset. Thereafter, we combined the 126 crude drugs into 104 crude drug groups to examine multicollinearity. Finally, the reporting odds ratios (RORs), 95% confidence intervals, p values for Fisher's exact test, and number of reports were calculated for each crude group to identify those associated with DILI. Notably, the number of adverse event reports for DILI (63,955) exceeded that for interstitial lung disease (51,347), the most common adverse event. In total, 78 crude drug groups (90 crude drugs) were reported to have an ROR > 1, a p < 0.05, and ≥10 reported cases. Our results highlight DILI as an essential issue, given that it was among the most frequently reported adverse drug reactions. We were able to clearly identify the crude drugs associated with DILI, which could help manage adverse drug reactions attributed to Kampo medicines and crude drugs.

The Influence of the Rapid Increase in the Number of Adverse Event Reports for COVID-19 Vaccine on the Disproportionality Analysis Using JADER.

The COVID-19 prophylactic vaccine for the prevention of coronavirus infection was approved in Japan on February 14, 2021. Adverse event reports for the vaccine were collected from the Japan Adverse Drug Event Relief (JADER) database, similar to those for drugs. Reported odds ratios (RORs) and proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) are commonly used in disproportionality analysis to detect safety signals. Therefore, adverse event reports from the vaccinated population may affect the detection of safety signals for the registered drugs. This study determined the impact of adverse event reports on the detection of safety signals for a COVID-19 prophylactic vaccine by analyzing the JADER database using disproportionality analysis. We extracted data from the JADER dataset, in which the COVID-19 vaccine was reported as a suspected drug, and selected the top 10 adverse events in terms of the number of reports. We then extracted the top 30 drugs by the amount of information in the selected 10 adverse events and compared the changes in the number of signal detections with and without the COVID-19 vaccine report data. The total number of adverse events reported in the JADER database during the study period was 2,002,564. Of the total number of reports, 85,489 (4.3%) reported adverse events related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Of the top 30 drugs reported in the 10 selected adverse events, the ROR and PRR were found to be lower with the inclusion of COVID-19 vaccine data than without. Detection by ROR excluded 23 out of 245 drugs, and detection by PRR excluded 34 out of 204 drugs. The rapid increase in the number of adverse event reports for the COVID-19 vaccine in JADER may affect the detection of safety signals by disproportionality analysis.

Diabetic Ketoacidosis Management in the Emergency Department: Implementation of a Protocol to Reduce Variability and Improve Safety.

Emergency departments (EDs) are the primary venue for diagnosis and initiation of treatment of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Typically managed in an intensive care unit (ICU), in many medical centers, limited ICU bed availability necessitates DKA-extended ED management until sufficient improvement for admission to a non-ICU bed. Although DKA treatment is well established, coordinating safe and effective extended care in a busy ED is complex. Recurrent problems in this high-risk transition of care led us to improvement efforts. We studied the impact of a standardizing ED DKA management in two phases: rollout of a DKA pathway in our computerized order entry system followed by audit and feedback. We evaluated adherence, clinical process, operational, and safety measures following these interventions. Adherence to the pathway was initially slow, improving significantly after audit and feedback. We observed mixed improvements in clinical processes, no changes in operational metrics (as expected), and reductions in variability for several measures. There were no deteriorations and improvements in measures of safety, and a reduction in the number of adverse event reports in the postimplementation periods.

An Analysis of the FDA MAUDE Database and the Search for Cobalt Toxicity in Class 3 Johnson & Johnson/DePuy Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants.

This study was designed to determine whether systemic cobalt toxicity as an adverse event could be documented using the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for cobalt-chromium containing hip implant recipients. Class 3 Johnson & Johnson (J&J)/DePuy devices were chosen for analysis because of the large number of adverse event reports related to their Pinnacle and ASR XL Acetabular hip replacement systems. A secondary goal was to characterize the reporters who are populating the information in the MAUDE database and to evaluate the quality of the data and information submitted. Using FDA MAUDE downloadable data files, 83,528 adverse event medical device narrative reports were identified with the product code of KWA (Prosthesis, Hip, Semiconstrained [Metal Uncemented Acetabular Component]) for J&J/DePuy (KWA Text File). These are class 3 devices and devices with known high failure rates. The ASR XL Acetabular hip replacement Systems and Pinnacle fall into this category. This group of implants was chosen because implant failure is associated with elevated cobalt levels. Two additional subfiles were created from Free Text records in the narrative reports containing key words that indicated a chromium or cobalt (CrCo) device and another for key words indicating elevated levels of cobalt or toxicity. These files were then searched for symptoms of systemic cobalt toxicity with Microsoft Excel using key words pertaining to symptom categories of: cognitive/memory loss, tremor, neuropathy, depression, auditory symptoms, visual symptoms, cardiac, and thyroid disease. Reports are submitted to the FDA at the device component level. It was common for multiple reports to be submitted for a single device. It was not possible to differentiate systemic versus local symptoms for adverse event reports in the neuropathy category. This category was not analyzed. The number of adverse event reports in the other categories ranged from 119 to 16 for the J&J/DePuy KWA Text File and 59 to 4 in the file of records having key words indicating potential elevation of CrCo or toxicity. Cardiac, visual, and auditory conditions were most frequently reported. With the possible exception of cardiomyopathy, the numbers of these reports are far below the prevalence expected in the general population of comparable age. The content of the MAUDE database records often contained little objective data. We found less than 4% of 14,714 records, which indicated cobalt elevation or toxicity contained units for quantitative measurement. There was also frequent use of nondescript, all-encompassing words and phrases such as "mental anguish," found in 321 KWA Text File records. Manufacturers submitted more than 99% of the reports and the most common reporter occupation was attorney, found in 42.24% of the 83,550 J&J/DePuy KWA Reporter File records. Physician was the reporter's occupation in 20.48% of reports but seldom reported directly to the FDA. We were not able find in the FDA MAUDE database meaningful warning signs to support the contention that chromium-cobalt-containing Class 3 J&J and DePuy hip implants caused systemic neurological or thyroid symptoms in patients. The incidence of reported cardiomyopathy was rare but frequent enough to be cause of concern. The redaction of most patient data along with the nonstructured nature of data entry would be expected to hinder the identification of warning signs. Even identification of the type of device could not be consistently carried out. In addition, the FDA needs to implement a methodology to identify and group all reports from a single device implanted into a patient, so duplication of event counting would not occur. Of 83,550 J&J/DePuy KWA Reporter File records, we found only two physician reports sent directly to the FDA. Almost all reports are submitted by manufacturers and are most commonly authored by attorneys. A standard of care needs to be set for physicians to report medical device adverse events to the FDA.

Retrospective Study of Reported Adverse Events Due to Complementary Health Products in Singapore From 2010 to 2016.

The objective of this study is to collate and analyse adverse event reports associated with the use of complementary health products (CHP) submitted to the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) of Singapore for the period 2010–2016 to identify various trends and signals for pharmacovigilance purposes. A total of 147,215 adverse event reports suspected to be associated with pharmaceutical products and CHP were received by HSA between 2010 and 2016. Of these, 143,191 (97.3%) were associated with chemical drugs, 1,807 (1.2%) with vaccines, 1,324 (0.9%) with biological drugs (biologics), and 893 (0.6%) with CHP. The number of adverse event reports associated with Chinese Proprietary Medicine, other complementary medicine and health supplements are presented. Eight hundred and ninety three adverse event reports associated with CHP in the 7-year period have been successfully collated and analyzed. In agreement with other studies, adverse events related to the “skin and appendages disorders” were the most commonly reported. Most of the cases involved dermal allergies (e.g., rashes) associated with the use of glucosamine products and most of the adulterated products were associated with the illegal addition of undeclared drugs for pain relief. Dexamethasone, chlorpheniramine, and piroxicam were the most common adulterants detected. Reporting suspected adverse events is strongly encouraged even if the causality is not confirmed because any signs of clustering will allow rapid regulatory actions to be taken. The findings from this study help to create greater awareness on the health risks, albeit low, when consuming CHP and dispelling the common misconception that “natural” means “safe.” In particular, healthcare professionals and the general public should be aware of potential adulteration of CHP. The analysis of spontaneously reported adverse events is an important surveillance system in monitoring the safety of CHP and helps in the understanding of the risk associated with the use of such products. Greater collaboration and communication between healthcare professionals, regulators, patients, manufacturers, researchers, and the general public are important to ensure the quality and safety of CHP.

The application of failure mode and effect analysis in the retrospective management of high-value consumables in implant operation

Objective The failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) were used to monitor the managerial process of high-value consumables in the implantation surgery, and establish the traceable management process for high-value consumables of the implantation surgery. Methods FMEA was used to carry out risk assessment process, formulate specific measures for improvement. The risk priority number (RPN), the qualified rate of the management index of implant surgical consumables, the patients satisfaction, and the number of adverse events reported were compared before and after the implementation of this process management. Results After FMEA was used to conduct management over implant surgery consumables, the RPN value decreased dramatically due to difficulty of traceability, information recording, and imperfect management system, thereby showing that the difference was statistically significant (t=16.655, 10.664, 9.321, P<0.01). Quality management measures: the access to consumables meets the requirements, complete information record, quality of stock consumables, paste bar code standard, charge accurate, return visits and records on time, consumables traceability, patient satisfaction rate were 99.2% (373/376), 96.7% (363/376), 99.5% (374/376), 95.6% (361/376), 98.6% (371/376), 95.7% (360/376), 100.0% (376/376), 97.1% (365/376), respectively after the implementation of this process management, which were higher than 90.9% (355/390), 81.8% (319/390), 94.2% (367/390), 91.3% (356/390), 84.7% (330/390), 87.3% (341/390), 87.5% (342/390), 91.8% (358/390) before the implementation of this process management, thereby showing that the difference was statistically significant (χ2=7.149-49.371, P < 0.01). The number of adverse consumables event reports increased from 0 up to 5. Conclusions It was feasible and effective to improve the level of hospital management and ensure the safety of patients by using the FMEA model in the implantation surgical high-value consumables. Key words: Failure mode and effect analysis; Surgical consumables; Operating room

Adverse Event Reports Associated with Vaginal Mesh: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis

BackgroundSurgery with vaginal mesh is often used to treat female urinary incontinence. Questions have emerged over the past decade about the safety and efficacy of vaginal mesh devices. ObjectiveThis study examines trends in adverse event reports associated with vaginal mesh devices, testing the hypothesis that Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announcements will result in increased adverse event reports to the FDA. MethodsUsing interrupted time series regression models, we analyzed adverse event report data collected from the FDA's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience reporting system in 1998 through 2015. ResultsFDA announcements had limited effects on the number of adverse event reports, whereas an announcement from a mesh manufacturer that it was withdrawing devices from the market resulted in a large spike in reports. ConclusionsThese findings raise concerns about the dispersion of risk communications, the FDA's reliance on adverse event reports for postmarket surveillance, and the FDA's clearance of vaginal mesh without safety or efficacy testing.

Current Status of Parkinsonism-Related Adverse Events and Associated Drugs in Korea.

The aim of the study was to explore the current status of drug-induced parkinsonism and drugs possibly related to drug-induced parkinsonism in Korea. We conducted a cross-sectional study using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System database between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015. We identified all adverse event reports associated with parkinsonism. There were 1402 adverse event reports associated with parkinsonism. The number of adverse event reports has increased annually. Among the 1499 drugs associated with parkinsonism, the most common were metoclopramide (49.77%) and paliperidone (16.14%). The major therapeutic groups (the third level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code) were propulsives (53.87%) and antipsychotics (35.58%). The mean time of onset of parkinsonism was 34.9 days. However, the time of onset of parkinsonism varied by drug, for example, it was 4.6 days for metoclopramide and 37.2 days for paliperidone. Metoclopramide and antipsychotics were reported in most adverse event reports associated with parkinsonism in Korea.

Adverse event reporting in Slovenia - the influence of safety culture, supervisors and communication.

The provision of safe healthcare is considered a priority in European Union (EU) member states. Along with other preventative measures in healthcare, the EU also strives to eliminate the “causes of harm to human health”. The aim of this survey was to determine whether safety culture, supervisors and communication between co-workers influence the number of adverse event reports submitted to the heads of clinical departments and to the management of an institution. This survey is based on cross-sectional analysis. It was carried out in the largest Slovenian university hospital. We received 235 completed questionnaires. Respondents included professionals in the fields of nursingcare, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and radiological technology. Safety culture influences the number of adverse event reports submitted to the head of a clinical department from the organizational point of view. Supervisors and communication between co-workers do not influence the number of adverse event reports. It can be concluded that neither supervisors nor the level of communication between co-workers influence the frequency of adverse event reporting, while safety culture does influence it from an organizational point of view. The presumed factors only partly influence the number of submitted adverse event reports, thus other causes of under-reporting must be sought elsewhere.

Monitoring drug safety in Astrakhan, Russia

The problem of drug safety will never disappear as new drugs are delivered in increasing numbers. They have high biological activity and adverse drug reactions (ADR) [1]. Currently, adverse drug reactions are the fourth leading cause of death for patients.There are databases of ADRs (Vigibase, Eudravigilance), but we know that ADR manifestations may vary in different countries and regions, due to the demographic, genetic characteristics of the population and the quality of manufactured drugs [2]. In this regard, the study of the ADR at the regional level is very relevant. We aimed to optimize the work on monitoring drug safety in Astrakhan region through pharmacoepidemiological research and development of computer database for analysis of information coming to the center for drug safety monitoring (CDSM). 1. To study the rates of ADR reporting and the structure in the Astrakhan region at the regional center for drug safety monitoring.2. To analyze the outcomes of registered adverse drug reactions.3. To determine the causality of adverse drug reactions.4. To identify reports on the ineffectiveness of drugs.5. To analyze the rates and structure of ADR reporting for drugs prescribed off-label. We studied spontaneous adverse event reporting. The adverse event reports received by the regional CDSM for the period of 2010 to 2014 was analyzed. The groups of drugs were categorized according by Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. The data were analyzed using Microsoft Office Excel. The likelihood of whether an ADR was actually due to the drugs was assessed with the Naranjo algorithm. The analysis of the results showed that the establishment of the CDSM in September 2010, contributed to improvement of drug safety monitoring in health facilities of the region. Noteworthy was the increasing the number of adverse event reports in 2011 and 2012, compared with the beginning of the year 2010, when the CDSM was not yet functioning.The decrease of adverse event reporting in 2013 and 2014 was due to the fact that doctors in the region had access to better ADR drug information. Along with the increasing number of adverse event reporting we also noted the increase in the number of health facilities that monitored drug safety. The number of health facilities that reported, doubled from 2010 to 2014. We observed the increase in the number of adverse event reports submitted by pharmaceutical companies. General anti-infective drugs for systemic use (class J) were the most common cause of all registered ADRs (44%). Drugs for treatment of tuberculosis (group J04A) were the cause of adverse drug reactions in 34% of reports. ADRs associated with drugs used for treating diseases of cardiovascular system accounted for 16% of case-reports; drugs belonging to the group of Alimentary tract and metabolism (class A) and to the group of Nervous System (class A) were reported to cause ADRs in 10% of cases each. Type A adverse drug reactions, which are usually a consequence of a drug's primary pharmacological effect, were detected in 45% of cases. These reactions were often registered for drugs affecting cardiovascular system (class C), nervous system (class N), dlood and blood forming organs (class B). Type B ADRs were reported in 54% of cases. These were "idiosyncratic" reactions, which could not be predicted on the basis of the drug's main pharmacological action, were not dose-related and were severe [3]. The most frequent cause of type B adverse drug reactions was the General anti-infective medicines for systemic use (Class J). The fatality rate associated with ADRs was 0.3%. Type A adverse drug reactions resulted in death in 38% of cases. Type B ADR (anaphylactic shock) accounted for 62% of the patient's deaths. The Naranjo scale determined the causality of ADRs. The "definite" ADRs were detected in 14% of reports, "probable" - in 47%, and "possible" - in 39% of cases. The rate of reporting associated with ineffectiveness of drugs amounted to 1%. Most often the lack of therapeutic effect was reported in patients receiving drugs of class C (Cardiovascular system, 31% of all cases of inefficiency of drugs). These drugs were used in accordance with their official instructions for use. The proportion of ADR reports for drugs prescribed off-label was 1.4%. The results substantiate the need to continue drug safety monitoring in the Astrakhan region. We plan to further improve the software for ADR analysis.

Abstract 17021: Association Between Regulatory Review Times and Adverse Event Reports in New Cardiovascular Devices

Introduction: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves new high-risk medical devices after reviews of safety and effectiveness data gathered in clinical trials. Some have advocated for shorter review times to encourage innovation. We evaluated whether regulatory review time and product novelty predict adverse events involving high-risk cardiovascular devices. Methods: All high-risk cardiovascular devices approved between 2000-2009, grouped by FDA-assigned product codes were linked to regulatory review data and adverse events reported in the FDA’s Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database over the four years following FDA approval. Adverse events were classified according to severity, and linear probability / logistic regression models evaluated whether regulatory review times or product novelty predicted adverse event reporting. Results: Regulatory review times for 106 devices averaged 14.6 (SD: 9.77) months. Only 48/106 (45%) of devices in 28 product codes had at least 1 reported adverse event (mean: 182, range: 1-2706), yielding a total of 8,721 adverse event reports. Shorter regulatory review times were associated with a higher probability of any adverse event, as well as a higher probability of patient injury/death: a one standard deviation decrease in regulatory review time was associated with a 13.7% absolute/30.4% relative increase in risk of any adverse event reporting (95% CI: 6.8-20.5, p&lt;0.001), a 9.8% absolute/39.1% relative increase in absolute risk of adverse events involving serious injury or death (95% CI: 2.0-17.6, p=0.02), and a 9.8% absolute/39.1% relative increase in probability of being in the top quartile of the count of total adverse events involving injury or death (95% CI: 2.0-18.6, p=0.02). Controlling for review time, novelty of a product was not predictive of the presence or frequency of adverse event reports. Conclusion: High-risk cardiovascular devices with shorter FDA reviews were associated with a higher probability of any reported adverse events, of events involving serious injury or death, and were more likely to be among those with the highest number of adverse event reports of injury or death. These data should inform current proposals aimed at expediting the review of high-risk devices.

Two cheers or three for treatment guidelines? Nudging prescribers in right directions

Two cheers or three for treatment guidelines? Nudging prescribers in right directions

An Assessment of an Educational Intervention on Resident Physician Attitudes, Knowledge, and Skills Related to Adverse Event Reporting

Reporting and learning from events linked to patient harm and unsafe conditions is critical to improving patient safety. Programs that engage resident physicians in adverse event reporting can enhance patient safety and simultaneously address all 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competencies. Yet fewer than 60% of physicians know how to report adverse events and near misses, and fewer than 40% know what to report. Our study evaluated the effect of an educational intervention on anesthesiology residents' attitudes, knowledge, and skills related to adverse event reporting and the associated follow-up. In a prospective study, anesthesiology residents participated in a training program focused on the importance of reporting methods and on reporting adverse events for patient safety. Quarterly adverse event reports were analyzed retrospectively for 2years before the intervention and prospectively for 7 quarters after the intervention. Residents also completed a survey, before and 1year after the intervention, that evaluated their attitudes, experience, and knowledge regarding adverse event reporting. After the intervention, the number of adverse event reports increased from 0 per quarter to almost 30 per quarter. We identified several categories of harm events, near misses, and unsafe conditions, including reports of disruptive providers. Of the harm events associated with invasive procedures, more than half were associated with lack of attending physician supervision. We also observed significant progress in the residents' ability to appropriately file a report, improved attitudes regarding the value of reporting and available emotional support, and a reduction in the perceived impediments to reporting. An educational intervention increased the number of adverse event reports submitted by anesthesiology residents, improved their attitudes about the importance of reporting, and produced a source for learning opportunities and process improvements in the delivery of anesthesia care.

CDISC Standard-based Electronic Archiving of Clinical Trials

Our objectives were to develop, based on the analysis of archived clinical trial documents and data and on the requirements of GCP-compliant electronic archiving, a concept for legally secure and technically feasible archiving of the entire clinical trial, including the essential documents of the trial master file and the study database. Based on own experiences with CDISC, existing implementations and future developments, CDISC standards were evaluated concerning requirements for archiving clinical studies. Trial master files of a small, medium and large clinical study were analyzed to collect specifications for electronic archiving of records. Two different ways of long-term storage exist for the clinical trial archive: document-oriented archival and data archiving of the study database. The trial master file has a highly complex structure; its different parts can vary greatly in size, depending of the working style of investigators, number of patients recruited, the number of adverse event reports and the number of queries. The CDISC standard ODM is especially suited for archiving clinical trials, because among other features it contains the entire clinical trial data and full audit trail information. On the other hand SDTM is a content standard suited for data warehouses. Two recent developments in CDISC will affect the archival of studies: the further development of ODM in the area of "eCRF submission" and the use of "Electronic Source Data". The complexity and size of the trial master file requires new solutions. Though ODM provides effective means to archive the study database, it shows still deficiencies, especially for the joint archiving of data and the complex documentation of the trial master file. A concept was developed in which the ODM standard is part of an integrated archiving of the trial data and documents. ODM archiving of the study database enables long-term storage which is GCP-compliant. Archiving of documents of the trial master file in PDF/A, including links and electronic signatures, as well as the storage of selected study data in a data warehouse at the sponsor site in SDTM are the other components of the concept.

Criteria Revision and Performance Comparison of Three Methods of Signal Detection Applied to the Spontaneous Reporting Database of a Pharmaceutical Manufacturer

Several statistical methods exist for detecting signals of potential adverse drug reactions in spontaneous reporting databases. However, these signal-detection methods were developed using regulatory databases, which contain a far larger number of adverse event reports than the databases maintained by individual pharmaceutical manufacturers. Furthermore, the composition and quality of the spontaneous reporting databases differ between regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies. Thus, the signal-detection criteria proposed for regulatory use are considered to be inappropriate for pharmaceutical industry use without modification. The objective of this study was to revise the criteria for signal detection to make them suitable for use by pharmaceutical manufacturers. A model comprising 40 drugs and 1000 adverse events was constructed based on a spontaneous reporting database provided by a pharmaceutical company and used in a simulation to investigate appropriate criteria for signal detection. In total, 1000 pseudo datasets were generated with this model, and three statistical methods (proportional reporting ratio [PRR], Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network [BCPNN] and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker [MGPS]) for signal detection were applied to each dataset. The sensitivity and specificity of each method were evaluated using these pseudo datasets. The optimum critical value for signal detection (i.e. the value that achieved the highest sensitivity with 95% specificity) was identified for each method. The optimum values were also examined with the adverse events classified into two categories according to frequency. The three original detection methods and their revised versions were applied to a real pharmaceutical company database to detect 173 known adverse reactions of four drugs. The 1000 pseudo datasets consisted of an average of 81 862 reports and 11,407 drug-event pairs, including 1192 adverse drug reactions. The sensitivities of PRR, BCPNN and MGPS methods were 49%, 45% and 26%, respectively, whereas their specificities were 95%, 99.6% and 99.99%, respectively; these sensitivities were unacceptably low for pharmaceutical manufacturers, whereas the specificities were acceptable. The highest sensitivity for each method, obtained by changing critical values and maintaining specificity at 95%, was 44%, 62% and 62%, respectively. When adverse events were classified into two categories, sensitivities as high as 75% for regular events and 39% for rare events were achieved with the revised BCPNN method. The critical values of the information component minus two standard deviations (IC - 2SD) index of the revised BCPNN method were greater than -0.7 for regular events and greater than -0.6 for rare events. The revised BCPNN method yielded 51% sensitivity and 89% specificity for the real dataset. A lower critical value may be needed when signal-detection methodology is applied to the spontaneous reporting databases of pharmaceutical manufacturers. For example, it is recommended that pharmaceutical manufacturers use the BCPNN method with IC - 2SD criteria of greater than -0.7 for regular events and greater than -0.6 for rare events.

Estimates of medical device–associated adverse events from emergency departments

Background The true public health burden of adverse events associated with medical devices is unknown. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to produce the first-ever national estimates of medical device–associated adverse events resulting in emergency department (ED) visits. Methods From July 1999 through June 2000, reports of 10,395 medical device–associated adverse events were accumulated using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), which collects information on product-related injuries from the ED records of a national stratified probability sample of hospitals. The reports were used to estimate annual total number of medical device–associated adverse events as well as number of adverse events associated with specific devices, injury diagnoses, demographic characteristics, and patient disposition status. Results The total estimated number of adverse events was 454,383 (95% confidence interval [CI]=371,156–537,610), involving a broad range of devices from 15 medical specialty groups. Unintentional traumatic events associated with a particular device appeared to be the most common mechanism of injury. The most prevalent types of injuries included contusions/abrasions, punctures, and lacerations; 13% of total estimated cases resulted in patient hospitalization. Adverse events occurred within healthcare facilities, and some were occupationally related, although they occurred at home more frequently than any other location (about 42%). Conclusions The magnitude of the total estimate, which is over four times greater than the annual number of adverse event reports received by medical device–regulating surveillance systems, emphasizes medical device–associated adverse events as an under-recognized public health problem. Planned collection of more detailed NEISS data will allow for appropriate public health interventions.