The article investigates the peculiarities of subject reference in Russian proverbs with third-person forms. The aim of the research is to identify the referential mechanisms of generalisation of the subjects who act in proverbs. The main source of empirical material is Russian proverbs from V.I. Dal’s collection (over 1,500 proverbs). The research methodology is based on A.V. Bondarko’s theory of categorical situations and the theory of reference by E.V. Paducheva, T.V. Bulygina and A.D. Shmelev. The study considered the ranking of subject statuses and the means of their transmission; the correlation between referential classes of nouns (qualitative, functional, relational) and their semantic groups (by occupation, personality, etc.); referential transit (transition from one class to another). The main generalisation mechanisms have been identified in proverbs as follows: genre frame, common nouns and noun groups with the meaning of person; specific means of generalisation (proper names, personal pronouns, null subject); and figurative use of names (zoonyms, artifacts, and anthroponyms). Each of these types has demonstrated the ability to vary the degree of subject reference, thus narrowing or expanding its scope. The highest, generalised level of reference is retained in those proverbs where subjects are expressed by quantifier pronouns, including in combination with the lexical unit human. In other cases, subjects implement the generic type of reference with the option of increasing or decreasing the level of reference. A special type of reference, i.e. conditionally referential, has been considered, which is implemented by zoonyms and artifacts, as well as by anthroponyms in figurative use. It has been noticed that high combinability of third-person verb forms with various means of expressing the subjects in proverbs predetermines their substantial referential potential. Stable relations between semantic groups of nouns and referential classes (qualitative class: external and internal characteristics of a person, gender, age, ethnicity, etc.; functional class: naming units according to activity; relational class: according to the relations) have been determined. Conditionally referential naming units (zoonyms and artifacts) correlate with qualitative and relational classes. In general, all classes include their respective semantic groups, but referential transits have been recorded. The qualitative name class turned out to be the most stable one: only internal transit, in which the semantic group of nouns changes, has been detected. The rest of the classes showed a tendency to external transit: functional and relational classes may perform referential transit to the qualitative class; and functional names may transit to the relational class. Thus, proverbs with third-person forms represent a range of referential statuses of subjects.
Read full abstract