Nuclear Receptor Ligand-binding Domain Research Articles

Structures of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Correlate with the Activation of 12 Classic Nuclear Receptors.

Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) can inadvertently interact with 12 classic nuclear receptors (NRs) that disrupt the endocrine system and cause adverse effects. There is no widely accepted understanding about what structural features make thousands of EDCs able to activate different NRs as well as how these structural features exert their functions and induce different outcomes at the cellular level. This paper applies the hierarchical characteristic fragment methodology and high-throughput screening molecular docking to comprehensively explore the structural and functional features of EDCs for the 12 NRs based on more than 7000 chemicals from curated datasets. EDCs share three levels of key fragments. The primary and secondary fragments are associated with the binding of EDCs to four groups of receptors: steroidal nuclear receptors (SNRs, including androgen, estrogen, glucocorticoid, mineralocorticoid, and progesterone), retinoic acid receptors, thyroid hormone receptors, and vitamin D receptors. The tertiary fragments determine the activity type by interacting with two key locations in the ligand-binding domains of NRs (N-H5-H3-C and N-H7-H11-C for SNRs and N-H5-H5'-H2'-H3-C and N-H6'-H11-C for non-SNRs). The resulting compiled structural fragments of EDCs together with elucidated compound NR binding modes provide a framework for understanding the interactions between EDCs and NRs, facilitating faster and more accurate screening of EDCs for multiple NRs in the future.

Structural mechanism underlying ligand binding and activation of PPARγ

Ligands bind to an occluded orthosteric ligand-binding pocket within the nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain. Molecular simulations have revealed theoretical ligand entry/exit pathways to the orthosteric pocket; however, it remains unclear whether ligand binding proceeds through induced fit or conformational selection mechanisms. Here, using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry, and surface plasmon resonance analysis, we provide evidence that structurally distinct agonists bind peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) via a two-step induced fit mechanism involving an initial fast kinetic step followed by a slow conformational change. The agonist encounter complex binding pose is suggested in crystal structures where ligands bind to a surface pore suggested as a ligand entry site in molecular simulations. Our findings suggest an activation mechanism for PPARγ whereby agonist binding occurs through an initial encounter complex followed by a transition of the ligand into the final binding pose within the orthosteric pocket, inducing a transcriptionally active conformation.

Molecular determinants of MED1 interaction with the DNA bound VDR-RXR heterodimer.

The MED1 subunit of the Mediator complex is an essential coactivator of nuclear receptor-mediated transcriptional activation. While structural requirements for ligand-dependent binding of classical coactivator motifs of MED1 to numerous nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains have been fully elucidated, the recognition of the full-length or truncated coactivator by full nuclear receptor complexes remain unknown. Here we present structural details of the interaction between a large part of MED1 comprising its structured N-terminal and the flexible receptor-interacting domains and the mutual heterodimer of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the retinoid X receptor (RXR) bound to their cognate DNA response element. Using a combination of structural and biophysical methods we show that the ligand-dependent interaction between VDR and the second coactivator motif of MED1 is crucial for complex formation and we identify additional, previously unseen, interaction details. In particular, we identified RXR regions involved in the interaction with the structured N-terminal domain of MED1, as well as VDR regions outside the classical coactivator binding cleft affected by coactivator recruitment. These findings highlight important roles of each receptor within the heterodimer in selective recognition of MED1 and contribute to our understanding of the nuclear receptor-coregulator complexes.

SUN-LB138 Dynamic Structural Model of Testosterone Entry Into the Unliganded Androgen Receptor

Background: Crystallographic structures of nuclear receptor ligand binding domains provide a static model of a receptor stably wrapped around an internalized ligand. Understanding the dynamics of a receptor at different stages of ligand binding has been hampered by the paucity of crystal structures for unliganded nuclear receptors. Molecular dynamic models have been constructed for some nuclear receptors to fill that void. Methods: The molecular simulation docking program MORDOR (MOlecular Recognition with a Driven dynamics OptimizeR)(1) was used to study the structural dynamics of the androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) modeled from the static structure of the AR LBD bound to testosterone (T) (PDB ID: 2AM9). The goals of the study were to understand a) the dynamic interaction of the T in its binding pocket, b) AR LBD structural flexibilities that permit T entry/exit from the binding pocket and c) a model of the unliganded AR LBD. Results: Modeling AR LBD structure flexibility over time revealed possible alternative dynamic structures, including those without ligand, overlaid against the canonical nuclear receptor structure. The model dynamically tracks the structural changes as a ligand enters into the ligand binding domain and nestles into the ligand binding pocket. The model predicted the appearance of alpha helices within the AR LBD that transiently fold/unfold during the ligand entry phases. Once in the pocket, the ligand itself remains very dynamic in a still flexible pocket. The model predicted also AR LBD amino acids that sequentially interact with the ligand during its dynamic entry into the AR LBD. Intriguingly, those AR amino acids include those mutated in castration-resistant prostate tumors that continue to grow during androgen suppression therapy. Functional studies showed those mutant ARs had a primary consequence of enhancing response to lower level T, and other androgens, consistent with their role in creating a higher affinity AR that can scavenge low-level androgens in an androgen-suppressed patient. Conclusions: The molecular model of T binding to the AR LBD suggests a degree of structural dynamism not evident in the crystallographic structures commonly associated with nuclear receptors. Some AR mutations activating prostate tumor growth may do so by impacting androgen entry/exit, rather than by altering androgen fit into the ligand binding pocket. Reference: (1) Guilbert C, James TL (2008) J Chem Inf Model. 2008 48(6): 1257-1268. doi: 10.1021/ci8000327

A comprehensive structural and functional analysis of the ligand binding domain of the nuclear receptor superfamily reveals highly conserved signaling motifs and two distinct canonical forms through evolution

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are transcriptional factors that play an essential role in all aspects of human development, metabolism and physiology. A prime example of a NR is the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Structure‑wise, the GR is typical of the NR superfamily, while its signaling is a part of multiple physiological mechanisms. In this study, using the GR and the steroid hormone receptors as a basis, an analysis of the structure, function and evolution of the NR ligand binding domain was conducted, while a list of NR mutations was composed in order to examine the effects of the mutations on NR structure and function. The results proposed 7 conserved signaling motifs and identified the amino acid repeating pattern ‘LxxLL’ or ‘LLxxL’ in the ligand binding domains (LBDs) of the NRs. Phylogenetic analysis revealed 4 distinct monophyletic branches, and it proposed new evolutionary relations between the LBD of NRs. Furthermore, structural and functional comparisons through NR LBD structures and their corresponding ligands displayed two major canonical forms, one for the steroid hormone‑like cluster and another one for the thyroid hormone‑like cluster. Last but not least, a new sub‑cluster of estrogen receptor α with a specific canonical form has been identified. Although this sub‑cluster has 98% similarity in sequence level with all known ERα, shows more significant structural similarity with the ERβ members (RMSD <2Å) rather than the ERα. In particular, the Y537S mutation, which is very common in breast cancer, creates this new trans‑form of ERα'. ERα' is functionally and structurally more similar to ERβ, while still retaining some of its ERα characteristics. This new information may be of high importance in order to understand the signaling mechanisms underlying NRs and cancer.

Atomistic simulations shed new light on the activation mechanisms of ROR\u03b3 and classify it as Type III nuclear hormone receptor regarding ligand-binding paths

The molecular recognition of the RORγ nuclear hormone receptor (NHR) ligand-binding domain (LBD) has been extensively studied with numerous X-ray crystal structures. However, the picture afforded by these complexes is static and does not fully explain the functional behavior of the LBD. In particular, the apo structure of the LBD seems to be in a fully active state, with no obvious differences to the agonist-bound structure. Further, several atypical in vivo inverse agonists have surprisingly been found to co-crystallize with the LBD in agonist mode (with co-activator), leading to a disconnection between molecular recognition and functional activity. Moreover, the experimental structures give no clues on how RORγ LBD binders access the interior of the LBD. To address all these points, we probe here, with a variety of simulation techniques, the fine structural balance of the RORγ LBD in its apo vs. holo form, the differences in flexibility and stability of the LBD in complex with agonists vs. inverse agonists and how binders diffuse in and out of the LBD in unbiased simulations. Our data conclusively point to the stability afforded by the so-called “agonist lock” between H479 and Y502 and the precise location of Helix 12 (H12) for the competence of the LBD to bind co-activator proteins. We observe the “water trapping” mechanism suggested previously for the atypical inverse agonists and discover a different behavior for the latter when co-activator is present or absent, which might help explain their conflicting data. Additionally, we unveil the same entry/exit path for agonists and inverse agonist into and out of the LBD for RORγ, suggesting it belongs to the type III NHR sub-family.

Detecting the Ligand-binding Domain Dimerization Activity of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Using the Mammalian Two-Hybrid Assay.

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) is an estrogenic ligand-dependent transcription regulator. The sequence of ERα protein is highly conserved among species. It has been thought that the function of human and mouse ERαs is identical. We demonstrate the differential 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4OHT) effect on mouse and human ERα ligand-binding domain (LBD) dimerization activity using the mammalian two-hybrid (M2H) assay. The M2H assay can demonstrate the efficiency of LBD homodimerization activity in mammalian cells, utilizing the transfection of two protein expression plasmids (GAL4 DNA-binding domain [DBD] fusion LBD and VP16 transactivation domain [VP16AD] fusion LBD) and a GAL4-responsive element (GAL4RE) fused luciferase reporter plasmid. When the GAL4DBD fusion LBD and the VP16AD fusion LBD make a dimer in the cells, this protein complex binds to the GAL4RE and, then, activates a luciferase gene expression through the VP16AD dependent transcription activity. The 4OHT-mediated luciferase activation is higher in the HepG2 cells that were transfected with the mouse ERα LBD fusion protein expression plasmids than in the human ERα LBD fusion protein expression plasmid transfected cells. This result suggests that the efficacy of the 4OHT-dependent mouse ERα LBD homodimerization activity is higher than human ERα LBD. In general, the utilization of the M2H assay is not ideal for the evaluation of nuclear receptor LBD dimerization activity, because agonistic ligands enhance the basal level of the LBD activity and that impedes the detection of LBD dimerization activity. We found that 4OHT does not enhance ERα LBD basal activity. That is a key factor for being able to determine and detect the 4OHT-dependent LBD dimerization activity for successfully using the M2H assay. ERα LBD-based M2H assays may be applied to study the partial agonist activity of selective estrogen receptor modulators (e.g., 4OHT) in various mammalian cell types.

Defining a conformational ensemble that directs activation of PPAR\u03b3

The nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain (LBD) is a highly dynamic entity. Crystal structures have defined multiple low-energy LBD structural conformations of the activation function-2 (AF-2) co-regulator-binding surface, yet it remains unclear how ligand binding influences the number and population of conformations within the AF-2 structural ensemble. Here, we present a nuclear receptor co-regulator-binding surface structural ensemble in solution, viewed through the lens of fluorine-19 (19F) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and molecular simulations, and the response of this ensemble to ligands, co-regulator peptides and heterodimerization. We correlate the composition of this ensemble with function in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) utilizing ligands of diverse efficacy in co-regulator recruitment. While the co-regulator surface of apo PPARγ and partial-agonist-bound PPARγ is characterized by multiple thermodynamically accessible conformations, the full and inverse-agonist-bound PPARγ co-regulator surface is restricted to a few conformations which favor coactivator or corepressor binding, respectively.

Solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Ligand-Binding Domain of an Orphan Nuclear Receptor Reveal a Dynamic Helix in the Ligand-Binding Pocket

The ligand-binding domains (LBDs) of the NR5A subfamily of nuclear receptors activate transcription via ligand-dependent and ligand-independent mechanisms. The Drosophila Ftz-F1 receptor (NR5A3) belongs to the latter category, and its ligand independence is attributed to a short helical segment (α6) within the protein that resides in the canonical ligand-binding pocket (LBP) in the crystalline state. Here, we show that the α6 helix is dynamic in solution when Ftz-F1 is bound to the LxxLL motif of its cofactor Ftz, undergoing motions on the fast (picosecond to nanosecond) as well as slow (microsecond to millisecond) time scales. Motions on the slow time scale (∼10-3 s) appear to pervade throughout the domain, most prominently in the LBP and residues at or near the cofactor-binding site. We ascribe the fast time scale motions to a solvent-accessible conformation for the α6 helix akin to those described for its orthologs in higher organisms. We assign this conformation where the LBP is "open" to a lowly populated species, while the major conformer bears the properties of the crystal structure where the LBP is "closed". We propose that these conformational transitions could allow binding to small molecule ligands and/or play a role in dissociation of the cofactor from the binding site. Indeed, we show that the Ftz-F1 LBD can bind phospholipids, not unlike its orthologs. Our studies provide the first detailed insights into intrinsic motions occurring on a variety of time scales in a nuclear receptor LBD and reveal that potentially functionally significant motions pervade throughout the domain in solution, despite evidence to the contrary implied by the crystal structure.

How α-Helical Motifs Form Functionally Diverse Lipid-Binding Compartments.

Lipids are produced site-specifically in cells and then distributed nonrandomly among membranes via vesicular and nonvesicular trafficking mechanisms. The latter involves soluble amphitropic proteins extracting specific lipids from source membranes to function as molecular solubilizers that envelope their insoluble cargo before transporting it to destination sites. Lipid-binding and lipid transfer structural motifs range from multi-β-strand barrels, to β-sheet cups and baskets covered by α-helical lids, to multi-α-helical bundles and layers. Here, we focus on how α-helical proteins use amphipathic helical layering and bundling to form modular lipid-binding compartments and discuss the functional consequences. Preformed compartments generally rely on intramolecular disulfide bridging to maintain conformation (e.g., albumins, nonspecific lipid transfer proteins, saposins, nematode polyprotein allergens/antigens). Insights into nonpreformed hydrophobic compartments that expand and adapt to accommodate a lipid occupant are few and provided mostly by the three-layer, α-helical ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors. The simple but elegant and nearly ubiquitous two-layer, α-helical glycolipid transfer protein (GLTP)-fold now further advances understanding.

Exploring Flexibility of Progesterone Receptor Ligand Binding Domain Using Molecular Dynamics.

Progesterone receptor (PR), a member of nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily, plays a vital role for female reproductive tissue development, differentiation and maintenance. PR ligand, such as progesterone, induces conformation changes in PR ligand binding domain (LBD), thus mediates subsequent gene regulation cascades. PR LBD may adopt different conformations upon an agonist or an antagonist binding. These different conformations would trigger distinct transcription events. Therefore, the dynamics of PR LBD would be of general interest to biologists for a deep understanding of its structure-function relationship. However, no apo-form (non-ligand bound) of PR LBD model has been proposed either by experiments or computational methods so far. In this study, we explored the structural dynamics of PR LBD using molecular dynamics simulations and advanced sampling tools in both ligand-bound and the apo-forms. Resolved by the simulation study, helix 11, helix 12 and loop 895–908 (the loop between these two helices) are quite flexible in antagonistic conformation. Several residues, such as Arg899 and Glu723, could form salt-bridging interaction between helix 11 and helix 3, and are important for the PR LBD dynamics. And we also propose that helix 12 in apo-form PR LBD, not like other NR LBDs, such as human estrogen receptor α (ERα) LBD, may not adopt a totally extended conformation. With the aid of umbrella sampling and metadynamics simulations, several stable conformations of apo-form PR LBD have been sampled, which may work as critical structural models for further large scale virtual screening study to discover novel PR ligands for therapeutic application.

Ligand-binding domains of nuclear receptors facilitate tight control of split CRISPR activity.

Cas9-based RNA-guided nuclease (RGN) has emerged to be a versatile method for genome editing due to the ease of construction of RGN reagents to target specific genomic sequences. The ability to control the activity of Cas9 with a high temporal resolution will facilitate tight regulation of genome editing processes for studying the dynamics of transcriptional regulation or epigenetic modifications in complex biological systems. Here we show that fusing ligand-binding domains of nuclear receptors to split Cas9 protein fragments can provide chemical control over split Cas9 activity. The method has allowed us to control Cas9 activity in a tunable manner with no significant background, which has been challenging for other inducible Cas9 constructs. We anticipate that our design will provide opportunities through the use of different ligand-binding domains to enable multiplexed genome regulation of endogenous genes in distinct loci through simultaneous chemical regulation of orthogonal Cas9 variants.

A ligand-entry surface of the nuclear receptor superfamily consists of the helix H3 of the ligand-binding domain

We successfully simulated receptor-ligand complex holo-form formation using the human retinoid X receptor-α ligand-binding domain (LBD) and its natural ligand, 9-cis retinoic acid. The success of this simulation was strongly dependent on the findings for an initial structure between the apo-LBD and the ligand as well as the discovery of the driving forces underlying the ligand-trapping and subsequent ligand-induction processes. Here, we would like to propose the “helix H3 three-point initial-binding hypothesis,” which was instrumental in simulating the nuclear receptor (NR) superfamily. Using this hypothesis, we also succeeded in simulating holo-form formation of the human retinoic acid receptor-γ LBD and its natural ligand, all-trans retinoic acid. It is hoped that this hypothesis will facilitate novel understanding of both the ligand-trapping mechanism and the simultaneous C-terminal folding process in NR LBDs, as well as provide a new approach to drug design using a structure-based perspective.

Identification of a New Hormone-Binding Site on the Surface of Thyroid Hormone Receptor

Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors involved in cell differentiation, growth, and homeostasis. Although X-ray structures of many nuclear receptor ligand-binding domains (LBDs) reveal that the ligand binds within the hydrophobic core of the ligand-binding pocket, a few studies suggest the possibility of ligands binding to other sites. Here, we report a new x-ray crystallographic structure of TR-LBD that shows a second binding site for T3 and T4 located between H9, H10, and H11 of the TRα LBD surface. Statistical multiple sequence analysis, site-directed mutagenesis, and cell transactivation assays indicate that residues of the second binding site could be important for the TR function. We also conducted molecular dynamics simulations to investigate ligand mobility and ligand-protein interaction for T3 and T4 bound to this new TR surface-binding site. Extensive molecular dynamics simulations designed to compute ligand-protein dissociation constant indicate that the binding affinities to this surface site are of the order of the plasma and intracellular concentrations of the thyroid hormones, suggesting that ligands may bind to this new binding site under physiological conditions. Therefore, the second binding site could be useful as a new target site for drug design and could modulate selectively TR functions.

DOLINA – Docking Based on a Local Induced-Fit Algorithm: Application toward Small-Molecule Binding to Nuclear Receptors

Docking algorithms allowing for ligand and - to various extent - also protein flexibility are nowadays replacing techniques based on rigid protocols. The algorithm implemented in the Dolina software relies on pharmacophore matching for generating potential ligand poses and treats associated local induced-fit changes by combinatorial rearrangement of side-chains lining the binding site. In Dolina, ligand flexibility is not treated internally, instead a pool of low-energy conformers identified in a conformational search is screened for extended binding-pose candidates. Grouping rearranged residues in sterically independent families and side-chain conformer clustering are employed to achieve efficient use of the computational resources along with a good accuracy of the generated poses. Dolina was applied toward docking of small-molecule ligands to three different nuclear receptor ligand binding domains for which in total 18 high-resolution crystal structures were used as reference. The selected nuclear receptors feature a deeply buried ligand-binding site where local induced-fit is to be expected, particularly for receptor antagonists. For each receptor, a crystal structure with a cocrystallized small steroid ligand (template) was chosen as a target system, to which several synthetic ligands of different sizes were docked. Poses within an RMSD of 2.0 Å from the crystal reference pose were generated in 91% of the cases. In 28%, the pose with the lowest RMSD to the reference pose was ranked as the top one, and in 76% it was ranked among the top five poses. Detailed descriptions of the docking algorithm and observed results are included. Dolina is available free of charge for academic institutions.

Bisphenol A affects androgen receptor function via multiple mechanisms

Bisphenol A (BPA), is a well-known endocrine disruptor compound (EDC) that affects the normal development and function of the female and male reproductive system, however the mechanisms of action remain unclear. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of how BPA may affect ten different nuclear receptors, stable cell lines containing individual nuclear receptor ligand binding domain (LBD)-linked to the β-Gal reporter were examined by a quantitative high throughput screening (qHTS) format in the Tox21 Screening Program of the NIH. The results showed that two receptors, estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and androgen receptor (AR), are affected by BPA in opposite direction. To confirm the observed effects of BPA on ERα and AR, we performed transient transfection experiments with full-length receptors and their corresponding response elements linked to luciferase reporters. We also included in this study two BPA analogs, bisphenol AF (BPAF) and bisphenol S (BPS). As seen in African green monkey kidney CV1 cells, the present study confirmed that BPA and BPAF act as ERα agonists (half maximal effective concentration EC50 of 10–100nM) and as AR antagonists (half maximal inhibitory concentration IC50 of 1–2μM). Both BPA and BPAF antagonized AR function via competitive inhibition of the action of synthetic androgen R1881. BPS with lower estrogenic activity (EC50 of 2.2μM), did not compete with R1881 for AR binding, when tested at 30μM. Finally, the effects of BPA were also evaluated in a nuclear translocation assays using EGPF-tagged receptors. Similar to 17β-estradiol (E2) which was used as control, BPA was able to enhance ERα nuclear foci formation but at a 100-fold higher concentration. Although BPA was able to bind AR, the nuclear translocation was reduced. Furthermore, BPA was unable to induce functional foci in the nuclei and is consistent with the transient transfection study that BPA is unable to activate AR.

Nuclear receptors and their selective pharmacologic modulators.

Nuclear receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors and include the receptors for steroid hormones, lipophilic vitamins, sterols, and bile acids. These receptors serve as targets for development of myriad drugs that target a range of disorders. Classically defined ligands that bind to the ligand-binding domain of nuclear receptors, whether they are endogenous or synthetic, either activate receptor activity (agonists) or block activation (antagonists) and due to the ability to alter activity of the receptors are often termed receptor "modulators." The complex pharmacology of nuclear receptors has provided a class of ligands distinct from these simple modulators where ligands display agonist/partial agonist/antagonist function in a tissue or gene selective manner. This class of ligands is defined as selective modulators. Here, we review the development and pharmacology of a range of selective nuclear receptor modulators.

Structural Basis for the Accommodation of Bis- and Tris-Aromatic Derivatives in Vitamin D Nuclear Receptor

Actual use of the active form of vitamin D (calcitriol or 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3)) to treat hyperproliferative disorders is hampered by calcemic effects, hence the continuous development of chemically modified analogues with dissociated profiles. Structurally distinct nonsecosteroidal analogues have been developed to mimic calcitriol activity profiles with low calcium serum levels. Here, we report the crystallographic study of vitamin D nuclear receptor (VDR) ligand binding domain in complexes with six nonsecosteroidal analogues harboring two or three phenyl rings. These compounds induce a stimulated transcription in the nanomolar range, similar to calcitriol. Examination of the protein-ligand interactions reveals the mode of binding of these nonsecosteroidal compounds and highlights the role of the various chemical modifications of the ligands to VDR binding and activity, notably (de)solvation effects. The structures with the tris-aromatic ligands exhibit a rearrangement of a novel region of the VDR ligand binding pocket, helix H6.

Small Molecule Modulation of Nuclear Receptor Conformational Dynamics: Implications for Function and Drug Discovery

Nuclear receptors are targets for a wide range of ligands, both natural and synthetic, that regulate their activity and provide a means to pharmacologically modulate the receptor. Recent emphasis in the nuclear receptor field has focused on selective nuclear receptor modulators, which can display graded transcriptional responses and tissue selective pharmacological responses that deviate from the prototypical agonist or antagonist. Understanding the molecular mechanism of action of these selective modulators will provide significant insight toward the development of the next generation of modulators. Although most nuclear receptor structural studies have primarily focused on obtaining ligand-receptor cocrystal structures, recent studies implicate an important role for protein dynamics in the mechanism of action of nuclear receptor ligands. Here we review nuclear receptor studies reporting how ligands modulate the conformational dynamics of the nuclear receptor ligand-binding domain (LBD). A particular emphasis is placed on protein NMR and hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) techniques and how they provide complementary information that, when combined with crystallography, provide detailed insight into the function of nuclear receptors.

Identification of Nuclear Receptor Ligands using Differential Scanning Fluorimetry

Identification of ligands that interact with nuclear receptors (NRs) is both a major biological problem and an important initial step in drug discovery. Several in vitro and in vivo techniques are commonly used to screen ligand candidates against nuclear receptors, however none of the current assays allow screening without modification of either the protein and/or the ligand in a high-throughput fashion. Differential scanning fluorimetry (DSF) allows unmodified potential ligands to be screened as 10μL reactions in 96-well format against partially purified protein, revealing specific interactors. As a proof of principle, we used a commercially available NR ligand candidate chemical library to identify interactors to several well characterized human NRs. Compounds that interact specifically with NR Ligand Binding Domains stabilize the protein and result in an elevation of the thermal denaturation point as monitored by the environmentally sensitive dye SYPRO orange. We present results validating DSF as a new tool for identifying NR ligands and screening candidate compounds and also present results of orphan NRs currently under investigation.