nTMS Motor Mapping Research Articles

Tumor-Specific Alterations in Motor Cortex Excitability and Tractography of the Corticospinal Tract-A Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study.

Non-invasive brain mapping using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a valuable tool prior to resection of malignant brain tumors. With nTMS motor mapping, it is additionally possible to analyze the function of the motor system and to evaluate tumor-induced neuroplasticity. Distinct changes in motor cortex excitability induced by certain malignant brain tumors are a focal point of research. A retrospective single-center study was conducted involving patients with malignant brain tumors. Clinical data, resting motor threshold (rMT), and nTMS-based tractography were evaluated. The interhemispheric rMT-ratio (rMTTumor/rMTControl) was calculated for each extremity and considered pathological if it was >110% or <90%. Distances between the corticospinal tract and the tumor (lesion-to-tract-distance - LTD) were measured. 49 patients were evaluated. 16 patients (32.7%) had a preoperative motor deficit. The cohort comprised 22 glioblastomas (44.9%), 5 gliomas of Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS WHO) grade 3 (10.2%), 6 gliomas of CNS WHO grade 2 (12.2%) and 16 cerebral metastases (32.7%). 26 (53.1%) had a pathological rMT-ratio for the upper extremity and 35 (71.4%) for the lower extremity. All patients with tumor-induced motor deficits had pathological interhemispheric rMT-ratios, and presence of tumor-induced motor deficits was associated with infiltration of the tumor to the nTMS-positive cortex (p = 0.04) and shorter LTDs (all p < 0.021). Pathological interhemispheric rMT-ratio for the upper extremity was associated with cerebral metastases, but not with gliomas (p = 0.002). Our study underlines the diagnostic potential of nTMS motor mapping to go beyond surgical risk stratification. Pathological alterations in motor cortex excitability can be measured with nTMS mapping. Pathological cortical excitability was more frequent in cerebral metastases than in gliomas.

Identifying functional cortical plasticity after spinal tumour resection using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Our aim was to investigate the effectiveness of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) brain mapping to characterise preoperative motor impairment caused by an intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumour and postoperative cortical functional reorganisation. Preoperative and 1-year follow-up clinical, radiological and nTMS data from a case of thoracic spinal meningioma that underwent surgical resection of the lesion were collected and compared. A 67-year-old patient presented with severe progressive thoracic myelopathy (hypertonic paraparesis, clonus, insensate urinary retention) secondary to an IDEM tumour. Initial nTMS assessment showed bilateral upper limb representation with no positive responses for both lower limbs. He underwent successful surgical resection for his IDEM (meningioma WHO grade 1). At 1-year follow-up, the patient's gait was improved and his bladder function normalised. nTMS documented positive responses for both upper and lower limbs and a decrease in the area (right side: 1.01 vs 0.39cm2; left side: 1.92 vs 0.81cm2) and volume (right side: 344.2 vs 42.4uVcm2; left side: 467.1 vs 119uVcm2) of cortical activation for both upper limbs, suggesting a functional reorganisation of the motor areas after tumour resection. nTMS motor mapping and derived metrics can characterise preoperative motor deficit and cortical plasticity during follow-up after IDEM resection.

Resection of meningiomas located in motor eloquent areas – comparative analysis of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and conventional neuronavigation

ABSTRACT Background Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has been established as a preoperative diagnostic procedure in glioma surgery, increasing the extent of resection and preserving functional outcome. nTMS motor mapping for the resection of motor eloquent meningiomas has not been evaluated in a comparative analysis, yet. Methods We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis for tumor location and size in meningioma patients with tumors located over or close to the primary motor cortex. Half of the study population received nTMS motor mapping preoperatively (nTMS-group). The primary endpoint were permanent surgery-related motor deficits. Additional factors associated with new motor deficits were evaluated apart from nTMS. Results 62 patients (mean age 62 ± 15.8 years) were evaluated. 31 patients received preoperative nTMS motor mapping. In this group, motor thresholds (rMT) corresponded with tumor location and preoperative motor status, but could not predict motor outcome. No patient with preoperative intact motor function had a surgery-related permanent deficit in the nTMS group whereas four patients in the non-TMS group with preoperative intact motor status harbored from permanent deficits. 13 patients (21.3%) had a permanent motor deficit postoperatively with no difference between the nTMS and the non-TMS-group. Worsening in motor function was associated with higher patient age (p = 0.01) and contact to the superior sagittal sinus (p = 0.027). Conclusion nTMSmotor mapping did not lead to postoperative preservation in motorfunction. nTMS data corresponded well with the preoperative motorstatus and were associated with postoperative permanent deficits if tumors were located over the motor hotspot according to nTMS.

Motor function in multiple sclerosis assessed by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping.

Impaired motor function is a major cause of disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), involving various neuroplasticity processes typically assessed by neuroimaging. This study aimed to determine whether navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) could also provide biomarkers of motor cortex plasticity in patients with MS (pwMS). nTMS motor mapping was performed for hand and leg muscles bilaterally. nTMS variables included the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), corticospinal excitability measures, and the size of cortical motor maps (CMMs). Clinical assessment included disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale, EDSS), strength (MRC scale, pinch and grip), and dexterity (9-hole Pegboard Test). nTMS motor mapping was performed in 68 pwMS. PwMS with high disability (EDSS ≥ 3) had enlarged CMMs with less dense distribution of MEPs and various MEP parameter changes compared to pwMS with low disability (EDSS < 3). Patients with progressive MS had also various MEP parameter changes compared to pwMS with relapsing remitting form. MRC score correlated positively with MEP amplitude and negatively with MEP latency, pinch strength correlated negatively with CMM volume and dexterity with MEP latency. This is the first study to perform 4-limb cortical motor mapping in pwMS using a dedicated nTMS procedure. By quantifying the cortical surface representation of a given muscle and the variability of MEP within this representation, nTMS can provide new biomarkers of motor function impairment in pwMS. Our study opens perspectives for the use of nTMS as an objective method for assessing pwMS disability in clinical practice.

Influence of clinical and tumor-specific factors on the resting motor threshold in navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation

ObjectivePreoperative non-invasive mapping of motor function with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has become a widely used diagnostic procedure. Determination of the patient-individual resting motor threshold (rMT) is of great importance to achieve reliable results when conducting nTMS motor mapping. Factors which contribute to differences in rMT of brain tumor patients have not been fully investigated. MethodsWe included adult patients with all types of de novo and recurrent intracranial lesions, suspicious for intra-axial brain tumors. The outcome measure was the rMT of the upper extremity, defined as the stimulation intensity eliciting motor evoked potentials with amplitudes greater than 50µV in 50 % of applied stimulations. ResultsEighty nTMS examinations in 75 patients (37.5 % female) aged 57.9 ± 14.9 years were evaluated. In non-parametric testing, rMT values were higher in patients with upper extremity paresis (p = 0.024) and lower in patients with high grade gliomas (HGG) (p = 0.001). rMT inversely correlated with patient age (rs=-0.28, p = 0.013) and edema volume (rs=-0.28, p = 0.012) In regression analysis, infiltration of the precentral gyrus (p<0.001) increased rMT values. Values of rMT were reduced in high grade gliomas (p<0.001), in patients taking Levetiracetam (p = 0.019) and if perilesional edema infiltrated motor eloquent brain (p<0.001). Subgroup analyses of glioma patients revealed similar results. Values of rMT did not differ between hand and forearm muscles. ConclusionMost factors confounding rMT in our study were specific to the lesion. These factors contributed to the variability in cortical excitability and must be considered in clinical work with nTMS to achieve reliable results with nTMS motor mapping.

Selective Stimulus Intensity during Hotspot Search Ensures Faster and More Accurate Preoperative Motor Mapping with nTMS

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has emerged as one of the most innovative techniques in neurosurgical practice. However, nTMS motor mapping involves rigorous steps, and the importance of an accurate execution method has not been emphasized enough. In particular, despite strict adherence to procedural protocols, we have observed high variability in map activation according to the choice of stimulation intensity (SI) right from the early stage of hotspot localization. We present a retrospective analysis of motor mappings performed between March 2020 and July 2022, where the SI was only chosen with rigorous care in the most recent ones, under the guide of an expert neurophysiologist. In order to test the ability to reduce inaccurate responses and time expenditure using selective SI, data were collected from 16 patients who underwent mapping with the random method (group A) and 15 patients who underwent mapping with the proposed method (group B). The parameters considered were resting motor threshold (%), number of stimuli, number of valid motor evoked potentials (MEPs), number of valid MEPs considered true positives (TPs), number of valid MEPs considered false positives (FPs), ratio of true-positive MEPs to total stimuli, ratio of true-positive MEPs to valid MEPs, minimum amplitude, maximum amplitude and mapping time for each patient. The analysis showed statistically significant reductions in total stimulus demand, procedural time and number of false-positive MEPs. Significant increases were observed in the number of true-positive MEPs, the ratio of true-positive MEPs to total stimuli and the ratio of true-positive MEPs to valid MEPs. In the subgroups analyzed, there were similar trends, in particular, an increase in true positives and a decrease in false-positive responses. The precise selection of SI during hotspot search in nTMS motor mapping could provide reliable cortical maps in short time and with low employment of resources. This method seems to ensure that a MEP really represents a functionally eloquent cortical point, making mapping more intuitive even in less experienced centers.

Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Motor Mapping and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Tractography for Diencephalic Tumor in Pediatric Patients

Background. In deep-seated brain tumors, adequate preoperative planning is mandatory to assess the best surgical corridor to obtain maximal safe resection. Functional diffusor tensor imaging (DTI) tractography based on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor mapping has proven to be a valid preoperative examination method in adults. The aim of this paper is to present the application of nTMS and functional DTI tractography in a series of pediatric diencephalic tumors. Material and methods. Three patients affected by thalamic (one) and thalamopeduncular tumor (two) were successfully examined with nTMS motor mapping and DTI tractography between October 2020 and October 2021 (F:M 3:0, mean age 12 years ± 0.8). Cortical representation of leg, hand and mouth were determined in the affected hemisphere and the positive stimulation spots were set as seeds point for tractography. Results. Mapping of the motor cortex and tracts reconstruction for leg and hand were successful in all patients, while facial function was properly mapped in one patient only. In all cases, the procedure was well tolerated and no adverse events were recorded. Spatial relationships between tumor and functional tissue guided the surgical planning. Extent of the resection varied from 96.1% to 100% with a postoperative new motor deficit in one patient. Conclusions. nTMS and DTI fiber tracking is a feasible, effective and well-tolerated method to identify motor pathway in deep-seated lesion in pediatric population.

Comparison of anatomical-based vs. nTMS-based risk stratification model for predicting postoperative motor outcome and extent of resection in brain tumor surgery

BackgroundTwo statistical models have been established to evaluate characteristics associated with postoperative motor outcome in patients with glioma associated to the motor cortex (M1) or the corticospinal tract (CST). One model is based on a clinicoradiological prognostic sum score (PrS) while the other one relies on navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) and diffusion-tensor-imaging (DTI) tractography. The objective was to compare the models regarding their prognostic value for postoperative motor outcome and extent of resection (EOR) with the aim of developing a combined, improved model. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed a consecutive prospective cohort of patients who underwent resection for motor associated glioma between 2008 and 2020, and received a preoperative nTMS motor mapping with nTMS-based diffusion tensor imaging tractography. The primary outcomes were the EOR and the motor outcome (on the day of discharge and 3 months postoperatively according to the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) grading). For the nTMS model, the infiltration of M1, tumor-tract distance (TTD), resting motor threshold (RMT) and fractional anisotropy (FA) were assesed. For the PrS score (ranging from 1 to 8, lower scores indicating a higher risk), we assessed tumor margins, volume, presence of cysts, contrast agent enhancement, MRI index (grading white matter infiltration), preoperative seizures or sensorimotor deficits. ResultsTwo hundred and three patients with a median age of 50 years (range: 20–81 years) were analyzed of whom 145 patients (71.4%) received a GTR. The rate of transient new motor deficits was 24.1% and of permanent new motor deficits 18.8%. The nTMS model demonstrated a good discrimination ability for the short-term motor outcome at day 7 of discharge (AUC = 0.79, 95 %CI: 0.72–0.86) and the long-term motor outcome after 3 months (AUC = 0.79, 95 %CI: 0.71–0.87). The PrS score was not capable to predict the postoperative motor outcome in this cohort but was moderately associated with the EOR (AUC = 0.64; CI 0.55–0.72). An improved, combined model was calculated to predict the EOR more accurately (AUC = 0.74, 95 %CI: 0.65–0.83). ConclusionThe nTMS model was superior to the clinicoradiological PrS model for potentially predicting the motor outcome. A combined, improved model was calculated to estimate the EOR. Thus, patient counseling and surgical planning in patients with motor-associated tumors should be performed using functional nTMS data combined with tractography.

Mapping of Motor Function with Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Review on Clinical Application in Brain Tumors and Methods for Ensuring Feasible Accuracy.

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has developed into a reliable non-invasive clinical and scientific tool over the past decade. Specifically, it has undergone several validating clinical trials that demonstrated high agreement with intraoperative direct electrical stimulation (DES), which paved the way for increasing application for the purpose of motor mapping in patients harboring motor-eloquent intracranial neoplasms. Based on this clinical use case of the technique, in this article we review the evidence for the feasibility of motor mapping and derived models (risk stratification and prediction, nTMS-based fiber tracking, improvement of clinical outcome, and assessment of functional plasticity), and provide collected sets of evidence for the applicability of quantitative mapping with nTMS. In addition, we provide evidence-based demonstrations on factors that ensure methodological feasibility and accuracy of the motor mapping procedure. We demonstrate that selection of the stimulation intensity (SI) for nTMS and spatial density of stimuli are crucial factors for applying motor mapping accurately, while also demonstrating the effect on the motor maps. We conclude that while the application of nTMS motor mapping has been impressively spread over the past decade, there are still variations in the applied protocols and parameters, which could be optimized for the purpose of reliable quantitative mapping.

Preoperative nTMS and Intraoperative Neurophysiology - A Comparative Analysis in Patients With Motor-Eloquent Glioma.

BackgroundThe resection of a motor-eloquent glioma should be guided by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IOM) but its interpretation is often difficult and may (unnecessarily) lead to subtotal resection. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) combined with diffusion-tensor-imaging (DTI) is able to stratify patients with motor-eloquent lesion preoperatively into high- and low-risk cases with respect to a new motor deficit.ObjectiveTo analyze to what extent preoperative nTMS motor risk stratification can improve the interpretation of IOM phenomena.MethodsIn this monocentric observational study, nTMS motor mapping with DTI fiber tracking of the corticospinal tract was performed before IOM-guided surgery for motor-eloquent gliomas in a prospectively collected cohort from January 2017 to October 2020. Descriptive analyses were performed considering nTMS data (motor cortex infiltration, resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, latency) and IOM data (transcranial MEP monitoring, intensity of monopolar subcortical stimulation (SCS), somatosensory evoked potentials) to examine the association with the postoperative motor outcome (assessed at day of discharge and at 3 months).ResultsThirty-seven (56.1%) of 66 patients (27 female) with a median age of 48 years had tumors located in the right hemisphere, with glioblastoma being the most common diagnosis with 39 cases (59.1%). Three patients (4.9%) had a new motor deficit that recovered partially within 3 months and 6 patients had a persistent deterioration (9.8%). The more risk factors of the nTMS risk stratification model (motor cortex infiltration, tumor-tract distance (TTD) ≤8mm, RMTratio <90%/>110%) were detected, the higher was the risk for developing a new postoperative motor deficit, whereas no patient with a TTD >8mm deteriorated. Irreversible MEP amplitude decrease >50% was associated with worse motor outcome in all patients, while a MEP amplitude decrease ≤50% or lower SCS intensities ≤4mA were particularly correlated with a postoperative worsened motor status in nTMS-stratified high-risk cases. No patient had postoperative deterioration of motor function (except one with partial recovery) when intraoperative MEPs remained stable or showed only reversible alterations.ConclusionsThe preoperative nTMS-based risk assessment can help to interpret ambiguous IOM phenomena (such as irreversible MEP amplitude decrease ≤50%) and adjustment of SCS stimulation intensity.

Mapping of multiple muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation: absolute and relative test-retest reliability.

The spatial accuracy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may be as small as a few millimeters. Despite such great potential, navigated TMS (nTMS) mapping is still underused for the assessment of motor plasticity, particularly in clinical settings. Here, we investigate the within‐limb somatotopy gradient as well as absolute and relative reliability of three hand muscle cortical representations (MCRs) using a comprehensive grid‐based sulcus‐informed nTMS motor mapping. We enrolled 22 young healthy male volunteers. Two nTMS mapping sessions were separated by 5–10 days. Motor evoked potentials were obtained from abductor pollicis brevis (APB), abductor digiti minimi, and extensor digitorum communis. In addition to individual MRI‐based analysis, we studied normalized MNI MCRs. For the reliability assessment, we calculated intraclass correlation and the smallest detectable change. Our results revealed a somatotopy gradient reflected by APB MCR having the most lateral location. Reliability analysis showed that the commonly used metrics of MCRs, such as areas, volumes, centers of gravity (COGs), and hotspots had a high relative and low absolute reliability for all three muscles. For within‐limb TMS somatotopy, the most common metrics such as the shifts between MCR COGs and hotspots had poor relative reliability. However, overlaps between different muscle MCRs were highly reliable. We, thus, provide novel evidence that inter‐muscle MCR interaction can be reliably traced using MCR overlaps while shifts between the COGs and hotspots of different MCRs are not suitable for this purpose. Our results have implications for the interpretation of nTMS motor mapping results in healthy subjects and patients with neurological conditions.

Primary hand motor representation areas in healthy children, preadolescents, adolescents, and adults

The development of the organization of the motor representation areas in children and adolescents is not well-known. This cross-sectional study aimed to provide an understanding for the development of the functional motor areas of the upper extremity muscles by studying healthy right-handed children (6–9 years, n = 10), preadolescents (10–12 years, n = 13), adolescents (15–17 years, n = 12), and adults (22–34 years, n = 12). The optimal representation site and resting motor threshold (rMT) for the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) were assessed in both hemispheres using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS). Motor mapping was performed at 110% of the rMT while recording the EMG of six upper limb muscles in the hand and forearm. The association between the motor map and manual dexterity (box and block test, BBT) was examined. The mapping was well-tolerated and feasible in all but the youngest participant whose rMT exceeded the maximum stimulator output. The centers-of-gravity (CoG) for individual muscles were scattered to the greatest extent in the group of preadolescents and centered and became more focused with age. In preadolescents, the CoGs in the left hemisphere were located more laterally, and they shifted medially with age. The proportion of hand compared to arm representation increased with age (p = 0.001); in the right hemisphere, this was associated with greater fine motor ability. Similarly, there was less overlap between hand and forearm muscles representations in children compared to adults (p<0.001). There was a posterior-anterior shift in the APB hotspot coordinate with age, and the APB coordinate in the left hemisphere exhibited a lateral to medial shift with age from adolescence to adulthood (p = 0.006). Our results contribute to the elucidation of the developmental course in the organization of the motor cortex and its associations with fine motor skills. It was shown that nTMS motor mapping in relaxed muscles is feasible in developmental studies in children older than seven years of age.

Navigated TMS in the ICU: Introducing Motor Mapping to the Critical Care Setting.

Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a modality for noninvasive cortical mapping. Specifically, nTMS motor mapping is an objective measure of motor function, offering quantitative diagnostic information regardless of subject cooperation or consciousness. Thus far, it has mostly been restricted to the outpatient setting. This study evaluates the feasibility of nTMS motor mapping in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and solves the challenges encountered in this special environment. We compared neuronavigation based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We performed motor mappings in neurocritical patients under varying conditions (e.g., sedation or hemicraniectomy). Furthermore, we identified ways of minimizing electromyography (EMG) noise in the interference-rich ICU environment. Motor mapping was performed in 21 patients (six females, median age: 69 years). In 18 patients, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were obtained. In three patients, MEPs could not be evoked. No adverse reactions occurred. We found CT to offer a comparable neuronavigation to MRI (CT maximum e-field 52 ± 14 V/m vs. MRI maximum e-field 52 ± 11 V/m; p = 0.6574). We detailed EMG noise reduction methods and found that propofol sedation of up to 80 mcg/kg/h did not inhibit MEPs. Yet, nTMS equipment interfered with exposed pulse oximetry. nTMS motor mapping application and use was illustrated in three clinical cases. In conclusion, we present an approach for the safe and reliable use of nTMS motor mapping in the ICU setting and outline possible benefits. Our findings support further studies regarding the clinical value of nTMS in critical care settings.

Short-Interval Intracortical Facilitation Improves Efficacy in nTMS Motor Mapping of Lower Extremity Muscle Representations in Patients with Supra-Tentorial Brain Tumors.

Simple SummaryPresurgical motor mapping of cortical muscle representations by single-pulse navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (sp-nTMS) is used to localize and enclose motor function in patients harboring motor-eloquent lesions. This study investigates paired-pulse nTMS (pp-nTMS) with biphasic pulses for motor mapping of lower extremity (lE) muscle representations, showing that significantly lower stimulation intensities are needed while reliable motor maps can be achieved even in the most demanding patient cases in whom conventionally used sp-nTMS fails. Thus, novel pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses may have potential to considerably facilitate improvements of currently used nTMS-based mapping procedures in the preoperative workup of neurooncological patients.Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is increasingly used for mapping of motor function prior to surgery in patients harboring motor-eloquent brain lesions. To date, single-pulse nTMS (sp-nTMS) has been predominantly used for this purpose, but novel paired-pulse nTMS (pp-nTMS) with biphasic pulse application has been made available recently. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses in comparison to conventionally used sp-nTMS for preoperative motor mapping of lower extremity (lE) muscle representations. Thirty-nine patients (mean age: 56.3 ± 13.5 years, 69.2% males) harboring motor-eloquent brain lesions of different entity underwent motor mapping of lE muscle representations in lesion-affected hemispheres and nTMS-based tractography of the corticospinal tract (CST) using data from sp-nTMS and pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses, respectively. Compared to sp-nTMS, pp-nTMS enabled motor mapping with lower stimulation intensities (61.8 ± 13.8% versus 50.7 ± 11.6% of maximum stimulator output, p < 0.0001), and it provided reliable motor maps even in the most demanding cases where sp-nTMS failed (pp-nTMS was able to provide a motor map in five patients in whom sp-nTMS did not provide any motor-positive points, and pp-nTMS was the only modality to provide a motor map in one patient who also did not show motor-positive points during intraoperative stimulation). Fiber volumes of the tracked CST were slightly higher when motor maps of pp-nTMS were used, and CST tracking using pp-nTMS data was also possible in the five patients in whom sp-nTMS failed. In conclusion, application of pp-nTMS with biphasic pulses enables preoperative motor mapping of lE muscle representations even in the most challenging patients in whom the motor system is at high risk due to lesion location or resection.

Application of presurgical navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation motor mapping for adjuvant radiotherapy planning in patients with high-grade gliomas

BackgroundNavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is applied in neurosurgical routine to detect motor-eloquent brain areas for safe resection of high-grade gliomas (HGGs). However, in radiation therapy (RT) planning, the primary motor cortex is not respected yet in target volume delineation. This study evaluates the implementation of nTMS motor mapping in RT planning in patients harboring motor-eloquent HGGs with the aim of reducing dose applications to the motor cortex. MethodsnTMS motor maps of 30 patients diagnosed with motor-eloquent HGGs were fused with RT planning imaging and volumetric modulated RT plans were optimized using nTMS motor maps as an organ at risk (OAR). Doses to nTMS motor maps were evaluated using dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters. ResultsMean dose (Dmean) to the nTMS motor maps was 42.3 Gy (3.7–61.1 Gy) and was significantly reduced by 14.3% to 37.0 Gy (3.6–55.8 Gy, p < 0.05) when constraining the dose to nTMS motor areas to 45 Gy. Areas within the planning target volume (PTV) were not spared (overlap). Yet, the dose to PTV was not compromised. Even with an additional dose escalation (70 Gy) to the tumor area, nTMS motor maps can be spared by 4.6 ± 3.5 Gy (12.8%, p < 0.05). ConclusionsnTMS motor maps can be easily implemented in standard RT planning and applied for target contouring in RT of HGGs. Doses to motor-eloquent areas can be significantly reduced when considering nTMS motor maps without affecting treatment doses to the PTV. Thus, nTMS could be used as a valuable tool in RT planning.

First United Kingdom Experience of Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Preoperative Mapping of Brain Tumors

Surgery for lesions in eloquent brain areas remains challenging owing to the risk of permanent neurological deficits. To date, direct electrical stimulation (DES) and intraoperative neuromonitoring represent the reference standard. Recently, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) has emerged as a mapping tool to optimize surgical planning. Our aim was to correlate nTMS with the intraoperative findings and assess its effects on surgical decision-making. We retrospectively reviewed our series of patients who had undergone craniotomy for removal of a brain tumor at our institution with preoperative nTMS, intraoperative neuromonitoring, and DES from February 2017 to February 2018. Demographic data, tumor entity and location, extent of resection, change in surgical approach, and neurological outcome were collected. Of 35 patients, 24 (68.6%) had undergone preoperative motor mapping and 11 (31.4%) had undergone mapping for language. Histopathological examination demonstrated glioma in 88.6% (high grade, n= 24; low grade, n= 6), metastasis (n= 2), epidermoid cyst (n= 1), and cavernoma (n= 1). nTMS resulted in change in the surgical strategy in 31.5% (craniotomy size, n= 7; access pathway, n= 3; surgical indication, n= 1). The specificity of nTMS for language was 66.7%, with a negative predictive value of 74.1%. nTMS motor mapping correlated with DES in all cases, with a mean abductor pollicis brevis hotspot distance of 3.50 ± 0.66 mm (n= 9). nTMS is a safe, noninvasive adjunctive tool for preoperative mapping of brain tumors in eloquent areas. Furthermore, nTMS can influence the surgical decisions in up to one third of patients in our experience.

Cost-effectiveness of preoperative motor mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in patients with high-grade glioma.

OBJECTIVE Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is used to identify the motor cortex prior to surgery. Yet, there has, until now, been no published evidence on the economic impact of nTMS. This study aims to analyze the cost-effectiveness of nTMS, evaluating the incremental costs of nTMS motor mapping per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY). By doing so, this study also provides a model allowing for future analysis of general cost-effectiveness of new neuro-oncological treatment options. METHODS The authors used a microsimulation model based on their cohort population sampled for 1000 patients over the time horizon of 2 years. A health care provider perspective was used to assemble direct costs of total treatment. Transition probabilities and health utilities were based on published literature. Effects were stated in QALYs and established for health state subgroups. RESULTS In all scenarios, preoperative mapping was considered cost-effective with a willingness-to-pay threshold < 3*per capita GDP (gross domestic product). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of nTMS versus no nTMS was 45,086 Euros/QALY. Sensitivity analyses showed robust results with a high impact of total treatment costs and utility of progression-free survival. Comparing the incremental costs caused by nTMS implementation only, the ICER decreased to 1967 Euros/QALY. CONCLUSIONS Motor mapping prior to surgery provides a cost-effective tool to improve the clinical outcome and overall survival of high-grade glioma patients in a resource-limited setting. Moreover, the model used in this study can be used in the future to analyze new treatment options in neuro-oncology in terms of their general cost-effectiveness.

Preoperative mapping of the eloquent cortical areas using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with intraoperative neuronavigation for intracerebral lesions

Abstract Introduction: Maximal surgical resection with the preservation of cortical functions is the treatment of choice for brain tumors. Achieving these objectives is especially difficult when the tumor is located in an eloquent area. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a modern non-invasive, preoperative method for defining motor and speech eloquent areas. Material and methods: Patients with tumors located in motor and speech eloquent areas who presented at our institution between March 2017 and December 2017 were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were frequent generalized epileptic seizures and cranial implants. For lesions involving motor eloquent areas we performed a nTMS motor mapping and for lesions involving speech eloquent areas we supplemented the motor mapping with speech and language mapping. MR images were exported from the nTMS system in a DICOM format and then loaded in the intraoperative neuronavigation system. Based on these findings, the optimal entry point and trajectory were determined, in order to achieve a maximum surgical resection of the lesion, while avoiding new post-operative neurological deficits. Results: Nineteen patients underwent an nTMS brain mapping procedure between March 2017 and December 2017. In all cases a motor mapping procedure was done, but only in eight cases a speech mapping was also performed. Three patients presented new minor postoperatory deficits that consecutively remitted. The rest of the patients presented no added neurological deficits after surgery. In five cases the preexistent deficit was ameliorated after surgery and in three cases the deficit remitted. In one patient there was no improvement in the neurologic deficit after surgery. Conclusion: nTMS is a reliable tool for the preoperative planning of eloquent area lesions. It must be taken into account that functional areas have a high individual variability. Therefore, knowing preoperatively the extent of the eloquent area helps the neurosurgeon adapt the surgical approach in order to obtain a better functional outcome.

P 12 Integrating nTMS motor mapping of the M1 tongue area into diffusion tractography to reconstruct motor-speech pathways

Objective The preservation of important white matter tracts is extremely important to optimize the functional long-term outcome after brain tumour surgery. The integration of functional localizer data such as navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) as starting region of interest (ROI) within the primary motor cortex (M1) into diffusion-tensor-imaging- (DTI-) tractography algorithms represents a recent advancement of the methodology with regard to the reconstruction of the corticospinal tract (CST). We here studied the use of a single nTMS-derived seeding ROI of M1 of the tongue to reconstruct connected fibres of the motor-speech network. Methods 13 healthy volunteers were investigated by nTMS mapping of M1. The hotspot, i.e. the cortical site of the highest motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, of the tongue representation was localized. The 3D-coordinate of the respective voxel (site of maximum calculated electrical-field strength) was obtained and was enlarged by a radius of 5 mm. This spheric ROI, representing M1 of the tongue, served as origin for probabilistic fibre tracking (FSL). The reconstructed fibres were segmented according to anatomical knowledge. Moreover, the tractography result was compared to the ”traditional” approach using and anatomical seeding-ROI of equivalent size and depth. Tracts were visualized using MRIcron and Slicer (3D). Results Segments of the arcuate fasciculus (AF) could be reconstructed in all subjects using the single M1-tongue-ROI. Most prominently, the anterior segment of the AF was observed, linking the triangular and opercular part of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), i.e., Broca’s territory, with the inferior parietal lobule (85% of cases). Moreover, also the long segment of the AF, connecting the IFG to the angular and dorsal superior temporal gyrus, could be displayed in most cases (92% of cases). Besides several motor pathways like the CST, other tracts involved in language/speech processing were reconstructed using this approach, e.g., the left frontal aslant tract (85% of cases) for which a crucial involvement in speech production (verbal fluency) has been described. Preliminary results regarding diffusion metrics and numbers of aberrant fibres point towards the use of nTMS for seeding-ROI determination being more specific as compared anatomical ROI-seeding. Conclusions Implementing the M1 hotspot of the tongue as a unique seeding-ROI for probabilistic diffusion tractography allows for depiction of motor-speech associated fibres, particularly the anterior segment of the AF. In comparison to anatomical ROI-seeding, this approach may offer a higher specificity and thus avoid aberrant fibre reconstruction, particularly in areas of unfavorable signal-to-noise-ratio.

O12 RTMS therapy on M1 modifies the facial motor map in chronic neuropathic pain

Objectives Despite the poorly known mechanism of action, high-frequency rTMS targeted somatotopically to M1, is beneficial to treat therapy-resistant chronic neuropathic pain in about half of the patients. According to previous literature hand motor representation area is diminished in chronic pain. We hypothesized that face motor map is altered in chronic pain and will be restored after rTMS treatment. Another aim was to find the different patterns of plastic cortical reshaping. Methods 13 patients with severe unilateral, chronic atypical facial pain were examined before therapy (2 five-day rTMS treatment courses (2400 or 3600 pulses daily), separated by 6 weeks), and 4–5 days after the last treatment session. Motor mapping was performed at 105% rMT of the mentalis muscle using a grid (2 stimuli per square) to determine the extent of representation area on the hemisphere contralateral to painful side. Mapping was analyzed for hotspot, center-of-gravity (CoG) and representation area, calculated using spline-interpolation method. Patient scored the effect of treatment using patient global impression of change (PGIC). Results The hotspots and CoGs were located in anatomically expected areas. In group level, the rTMS did not cause any shift in mediolateral or anteroposterior axis, or affect the extent of representation areas. However, there were several patients in whom the area significantly largened or became more compact/dense after the treatment. Noteworthly, the motor map of facial muscles was surprisingly small in four patients, whereof three scored high benefit. Discussion The face motor maps in patients with chronic facial pain are variable in size. There was a trend of rTMS increasing the motor map. In some patients the face motor map was clearly diminished and mainly, these patients responded to treatment well. This may be related to enhanced cortical plasticity. Conclusion nTMS motor mapping is a feasible method to study neuronal plasticity in chronic pain and enlighten the effects of rTMS. However, larger amount of patient is needed to draw conclusions about patterns of cortical plasticity. Significance Motor map area may be a biomarker for treatment response in chronic facial pain.