NSQIP Database Research Articles

Evaluation of Modified Frailty Index for Predicting Postoperative Outcomes After Upper-Extremity Replantation and Revascularisation Procedures.

Upper extremity (UE) replantation and revascularization are challenging surgical procedures, with survival rates being 50% to 90%. Preoperative risk stratification is challenging yet crucial as patients with comorbid conditions face increased complications. This study assesses the predictive value of the modified 5-item frailty index (5-mFI) for postoperative complications in these procedures. A retrospective study was done using the ACS NSQIP database (2011-2021) for UE replantation/revascularization. The 5-mFI score assigned points for comorbidities including pulmonary disease, heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, and functional status (0-5 scale; 1 point to each). 5-mFI scores stratified patients into <2 (low-risk) or ≥2 (high-risk) categories. Of 2,305 patients, the mean age and BMI were 53.13 years and 28.53 kg/m2 respectively. The 5-mFI≥2 cohort experienced higher rates of all-cause complications, systemic complications, unplanned readmissions, and return to the operating room on univariate analysis. There was no significant difference in wound complication rates. Multivariable logistic regression showed that a higher 5-mFI was significantly associated with increased risks of all-cause mild and severe systemic complications. Wound complications, length of stay over 30 days, unplanned readmission, and return to the operating room were higher in high-risk patients, however not statistically significant. 5-mFI is an effective tool for evaluating risk in UE replantation and revascularization, correlating high scores with significantly increased postoperative complications. High-risk patients with 5-mFI≥2 also had more reoperations and readmissions. The use of 5-mFI in preoperative assessments can help personalize management, enhancing patient selection and care quality in these complex reconstructions.

Surgical Approach and Length of Stay in Octogenarians Undergoing Pancreatic Resection for Malignancy.

Pancreatic surgery often has a lengthy recovery in the elderly. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can decrease length of stay (LOS), but it is unknown if this benefit applies to octogenarians (Age > 79). The NSQIP database was used to determine if MIS approaches were associated with reduced LOS among octogenarians undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple) or distal pancreatectomy (Distal). Operative approaches were classified as "Open" or "MIS" and propensity score (PS) matching was performed. For the Whipple, 1665 Open and 101 MIS procedures occurred (median LOS 9, 8 days, p = 0.584). For Distal, 472 Open and 223 MIS procedures occurred (median LOS 6, 5 days, p < 0.01). After PS matching, there were 202 Whipple (101 per group) and 446 Distal (223 per group) patients. There was no difference in LOS by approach in the Whipple group (p = 0.546). The median LOS was 9 (IQR 7-15), Open and 8 (IQR 6-13), MIS. For Distal, there was a difference in LOS in the Open versus MIS approach (p < 0.01) and the median LOS was 6 (IQR 5-8) and 5 (IQR 4-6). Among octogenarians the MIS approach was associated with decreased LOS in distal pancreatectomies, but not in pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients.

Retrospective Cohort Study. There is an ongoing debate as to the influence of specialty training on spine surgery. Alomari et al. indicated the influence of specialty on ACDF procedures. However, deeper analysis into other spine procedures and lower-acuity procedures has yet to occur. In this study, we aim to determine if the outcomes of the low American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA 1&2) patients undergoing spine surgery vary based on whether the operating surgeon was an orthopedic surgeon or a neurosurgeon. The NSQIP databases from 2015 to 2021 were queried based on the CPT code for nine common spine procedures. Indicators of surgical course and successful outcomes were documented and compared between specialties. Neurosurgeons had minimally shorter operative times in the ASA 1&2 combined classification (ASA-C) group for cervical, lumbar, and combined spinal procedural groups. Neurosurgeons had a slightly lower percentage of perioperative transfusions in select ASA-C classes. Orthopedic surgeons had shorter lengths of stay for the cervical groups in ASA-C and ASA-1 classes (ASA-1). However, many specialty differences found in spine patients become less pronounced when considering only ASA-1 patients. Finally, postoperative complication outcomes and re-admission were similar between orthopedic and neurological surgeons in all cases. These results, while statistically significant, are very likely clinically insignificant. They demonstrate that both orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons perform spinal surgery exceedingly safely with similarly low complication rates. This lays the groundwork for future exploration and benchmarking of performance in spine surgeries across neurosurgery and orthopedics.

Utility of Risk Analysis Index for Assessing Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity

This study investigates the predictive values of the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), the modified 5-item Frailty Index (mFI-5), and advanced age for predicting 30-day extended length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications and readmissions in patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adult spinal deformity (ASD). A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012-2021 ACS NSQIP database. Adults undergoing posterior spinal fusion for ASD were identified using CPT and ICD codes. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multivariable analyses, we compared the discriminative thresholds and independent associations of RAI, mFI-5, and greater patient age for extended LOS, 30-day complications and readmissions. In this cohort of 3,814 patients, RAI identified 90.7% as Robust, 6.0% as Normal, and 3.3% as Frail/Very Frail, while mFI-5 classified 47.1% as Robust, 37.5% as Normal, and 15.3% as Frail/Very Frail. Multivariate analysis revealed both RAI and mFI-5 as significant predictors of extended LOS for Normal (RAI: p<0.001; mFI-5: p=0.012) and Frail/Very Frail patients (RAI: p<0.001; mFI-5: p=0.002). Additionally, RAI was a significant predictor of 30-day complication risk for Normal patients (p=0.005). Furthermore, mFI-5 was a significant predictor of 30-day readmission among Frail/Very Frail patients (p=0.002). This study highlights the utility of RAI and mFI-5 in predicting extended LOS patients undergoing PSF for ASD. RAI was found to be superior to mFI-5 for predicting 30-day readmissions, while mF-5 was greater for 30-day complications. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating frailty assessments into preoperative surgical planning.

Assessing a revised-risk analysis index for morbidity and mortality after spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors.

Risk Analysis Index (RAI) has been increasingly used to assess surgical frailty in various procedures, but its effectiveness in predicting mortality or in-patient hospital outcomes for spine surgery in metastatic disease remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive values of the revised RAI (RAI-rev), the modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5), and advanced age for extended length of stay, 30-day readmission, complications, and mortality among patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal tumors. A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2012-2022 ACS NSQIP database to identify adult patients who underwent spinal surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and multivariable analyses, we compared the discriminative thresholds and independent associations of RAI-rev, mFI-5, and greater patient age with extended length of stay (LOS), 30-day complications, hospital readmission, and mortality. A total of 1,796 patients were identified, of which 1,116 (62.1%) were male and 1,008 (70.7%) were non-Hispanic White. RAI-rev identified 1,291 (71.9%) frail and 208 (11.6%) very frail patients, while mFI-5 identified 272 (15.1%) frail and 49 (2.7%) very frail patients. In the ROC analysis for extended LOS, both RAI-rev and mFI-5 showed modest predictive capabilities with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.5477 and 0.5329, respectively, and no significant difference in their predictive abilities (p = 0.446). When compared to age, RAI-rev demonstrated superior prediction (p = 0.015). With respect to predicting 30-day readmission, no significant difference was observed between RAI-rev and mFI-5 (AUC 0.5394 l respectively, p = 0.354). However, RAI-rev outperformed age (p = 0.001). When assessing the risk of 30-day complications, RAI-rev significantly outperformed mFI-5 (AUC: 0.6016 and 0.5542 respectively, p = 0.022) but not age. Notably, RAI-rev demonstrated superior ability for predicting 30-day mortality compared to mFI-5 and age (AUC: 0.6541, 0.5652, and 0.5515 respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed RAI-rev as a significant predictor of extended LOS [aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.13-3.38, p = 0.016] and 30-day mortality [aOR: 5.27, 95% CI: 1.73-16.06, p = 0.003] for very frail patients. Similarly, the RAI-rev significantly predicted 30-day complications for frail [aOR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.21-5.72, p = 0.015] and very frail [aOR: 3.69, 95% CI: 1.60-8.51, p = 0.002] patients. However, the RAI did not significantly predict 30-day readmission [Very Frail aOR: 1.52, 95% CI: 0.75-3.07, p = 0.245; Frail aOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.79-2.68, p = 0.225]. Our study demonstrates the utility of RAI-rev in predicting morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic spinal pathologies. Particularly, the superiority that RAI-rev has in predicting 30-day mortality may have significant implications in multidisciplinary decision making.

Thirty-Day Complication Rates After Gender-Affirming Bottom Surgery: An Analysis of the NSQIP Database From 2010 to 2020.

Gender-affirming bottom surgeries (GABS) play a central role in treating gender dysphoria to improve quality of life for transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) patients. However, there exists limited data on operative risks and outcomes for patient populations undergoing GABS. The goal of this study is to identify sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for determining 30-day postoperative complications in patients undergoing GABS. The ACS-NSQIP database from 2010 to 2020 was used to identify patients undergoing gender affirmation surgery (GAS) using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes included in transfeminine and transmasculine bottom surgery. IBS-SPSS software was used to perform a multivariate analysis to determine risk factors for increased 30-day postoperative complications including unplanned reoperation and readmission rates. A total of 1809 GABS were performed in the NSQIP database from 2010 to 2020. There was an upward trend in GABS procedures throughout the years, with 2017 having the most GABS (n = 629). Transmasculine patients with a BMI of 29 and over were at a greater risk for wound complications (P < 0.05). Diabetic transfeminine patients were also at a greater risk for wound complications (P < 0.05). This study identified that several sociodemographic and clinical risk factors, such as BMI and diabetes mellitus type 2, had increased postoperative complications for patients undergoing gender-affirming bottom surgeries. Wound care management and patient education are essential in GABS to prevent long-term complications. Physician awareness of risk factors and social determinants of health can help prevent and improve postoperative care education and patient compliance.

Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection in patients ≥75 years old: A NSQIP analysis evaluating 2674 patients.

Previous studies report promising outcomes with minimally invasive (MIS) hepatectomy in elderly patients but remain limited by small size. This study aims to comparatively evaluate the demographics and outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing MIS and open hepatectomy. The 2016-2021 NSQIP database was evaluated comparing patients ≥75 undergoing MIS versus open hepatectomy. Patient selection and outcomes were compared using bivariate analysis with multivariable modeling (MVR) evaluating factors associated with serious complications and mortality. Propensity score matched (PSM) analysis further evaluated serious complications, mortality, length of stay (LOS), Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC), and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) for cohorts. We evaluated 2674 patients with 681 (25.5%) receiving MIS hepatectomy. MIS approaches were used more for partial lobectomy (85.9% vs. 61.7%; p < 0.001), and required fewer biliary reconstructions (1.6% vs. 10.6%; p < 0.001). Patients were similar with regards to sex, body mass index, and other comorbidities. Unadjusted analysis demonstrated that MIS approaches had fewer serious complications (8.8% vs. 18.7%; p < 0.001). However, after controlling for cohort differences the MIS approach was not associated with reduced likelihood of serious complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.77; p = 0.219) or mortality (OR: 1.19; p = 0.623). PSM analysis further supported no difference in serious complications (p = 0.403) or mortality (p = 0.446). However, following PSM a significant reduction in LOS (-1.99 days; p < 0.001), CDC (-0.26 points; p = 0.016) and CCI (-2.79 points; p = 0.022) was demonstrated with MIS approaches. This is the largest study comparing MIS and open hepatectomy in elderly patients. Results temper previously reported outcomes but support reduced LOS and complications with MIS approaches.

Perioperative outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a NSQIP analysis.

Studies comparing outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs have yielded conflicting results. We sought to analyze early postoperative complications between these approaches using a newly available NSQIP variable indicating robot use. We queried the 2022 ACS NSQIP database for adult patients undergoing elective minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair. Chi-squared and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare cohort characteristics. Logistic, linear, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare perioperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups. We identified 4345 patients who underwent repair using a laparoscopic (2778 patients; 63.9%) or robotic (1567 patients; 36.1%) approach. Most (73.1%) were female, and the median age was 65 (IQR 55, 73). Patients who underwent robotic repair were younger (median age 64 vs 66), had a slightly higher body mass index (BMI; median 30.2 vs 29.9), and were more likely to have hypertension (53.0% vs 48.5%), all p < 0.01. On unadjusted analysis the robotic approach was associated with decreased 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 0.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, race, BMI, and hypertension, the robotic approach was not associated with increased major complications (5.6% vs 5.1%, AOR 1.13, 95% CI 0.86,1.49), minor complications (0.9% vs 1.5%, AOR 1.20, 95% CI 0.74,1.93), or unplanned readmission (6.5% vs 5.5%, AHR 1.17, 95% CI 0.89,1.54), all p ≥ 0.26. After adjusting for age and hypertension, the robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction (AOR 2.53, 95% CI 1.01,6.33, p = 0.048) and pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.76, 95% CI 1.17,6.49, p = 0.02), although none resulted in 30-day mortality. Robotic and laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repairs had similar overall complication and readmission rates. The robotic cohort had an increased risk of myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism but no 30-day mortality. Current data support the use of both robotic and laparoscopic approaches for paraesophageal hernia repair.

Impact of Procedure Risk vs Frailty on Outcomes of Elderly Patients Undergoing Emergency General Surgery: Results of a National Analysis.

The direct association between procedure risk and outcomes in elderly patients who undergo emergency general surgery (EGS) has not been analyzed. Studies only highlight the importance of frailty. A comprehensive analysis of relevant risk factors and their association with outcomes in elderly patients who undergo EGS is lacking. We hypothesized that procedure risk has a stronger association with relevant outcomes in elderly patients who undergo EGS compared with frailty. Elderly patients (age >65 years) undergoing EGS operative procedures were identified in the NSQIP database (2018 to 2020) and stratified based on the presence of frailty calculated by the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5; mFI 0 nonfrail, mFI 1 to 2 frail, and mFI ≥3 severely frail) and based on procedure risk. Multivariable regression models and receiving operative curve analysis were used to determine risk factors associated with outcomes. A total of 59,633 elderly patients who underwent EGS were classified into nonfrail (17,496; 29.3%), frail (39,588; 66.4%), and severely frail (2,549; 4.3%). There were 25,157 patients in the low-risk procedure group and 34,476 in the high-risk group. Frailty and procedure risk were associated with increased mortality, complications, failure to rescue, and readmissions. Differences in outcomes were greater when patients were stratified according to procedure risk compared with frailty stratification alone. Procedure risk had a stronger association with relevant outcomes in elderly patients who underwent EGS compared with frailty. Assessing frailty in the population of elderly patients who undergo EGS without adjusting for the type of procedure or procedure risk ultimately presents an incomplete representation of how frailty impacts patient-related outcomes.

Perioperative Outcomes and Reimbursement Patterns Associated With the Anterior versus Posterior Approach for Treatment of Type 2 Odontoid Fractures, a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Analysis

To evaluate the short-term surgical outcomes and the reimbursement patterns, after treatment of type 2 odontoid fractures using the anterior or posterior approach. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for surgically treated patients with type 2 odontoid fractures by the anterior or posterior approach between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score matching with the optimal approach was used to balance the cohorts. A total of 96 patients in the anterior and 352 patients in the posterior surgery group were included in the unmatched analysis. After propensity score matching 1:1, 96 anterior and 96 posterior cases were included in the matched analysis. Operative times were shorter in the anterior group (92.0 vs. 145.0minutes, P < 0.001). The need for intraoperative or postoperative transfusions was higher in the posterior group (15% vs. 2.1%; P= 0.002). However, there were no significant differences in complications between groups (P > 0.05). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the posterior group (4.5days vs. 3.0; P= 0.049). Nonroutine discharge was more frequent in the posterior group (55% vs. 40%, P= 0.030). However, the rate of 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). Also, the work relative value units were significantly higher in the anterior group (22.7 vs. 20.6, P < 0.001), indicating higher reimbursement trends for this approach. In this matched analysis, the anterior approach for type 2 odontoid fractures was superior to the posterior approach. The anterior approach was associated with significantly shorter operation times, hospital stays, fewer transfusions, nonroutine discharges, and higher reimbursements.

Implications of surgical infection on surgical and hospital outcomes after spine surgery: A NSQIP study of 410,930 patients

Study designRetrospective cohort study. ObjectivesSurgical infections are unfortunately a fairly common occurrence in spine surgery, with rates reported as high as 16 %. However, there is a relative paucity of studies that look to understand how surgical infections may impact outcome variables. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of surgical infection on other perioperative complications, extended hospital length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and unplanned readmission following spine surgery. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016–2022 ACS NSQIP database. Adults receiving spine surgery for trauma, degenerative disease, and tumors were identified using CPT and ICD-9/10 codes. Patients were divided into two cohorts: surgical infection (superficial surgical site infection, deep surgical site infection, organ space surgical site infection, or wound dehiscence) and no surgical infection (those who did not experience any infection). Patient demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables, postoperative adverse events (AEs), and healthcare resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of AEs, extended hospital length of stay, non-routine discharge, and unplanned readmission. ResultsIn our cohort of 410,930 patients, 7854 (2.2 %) were found to have experienced a surgical infection. Regarding preoperative variables, a greater proportion of the surgical infection cohort was a female (p < 0.001) and had a higher mean BMI (p < 0.001), greater frailty and ASA scores (p < 0.001), and higher rates of all presenting comorbidities included in the study. Rates of AEs (p < 0.001), unplanned readmission (p < 0.001), reoperation (p < 0.001), non-home discharge (p < 0.001), and 30-day mortality were all greater in the surgical infection group when compared to the group without surgical infection. On multivariate analysis, surgical infection was found to be an independent predictor of experiencing postoperative complications [aOR: 6.15, 95 % CI: (5.72, 6.60), p < 0.001], prolonged LOS [2.71, 95 % CI: (2.54, 2.89), p < 0.001], non-routine discharge [aOR: 1.74, 95 % CI: (1.61, 1.88), p < 0.001], and unplanned readmission [aOR: 22.57, 95 % CI: (21.06, 24.19), p < 0.001]. ConclusionsOur study found that surgical infection increases the risk of complications, extended LOS, non-routine discharge, and unplanned readmission. Such findings warrant further studies that aim to validate these results and identify risk factors for surgical infections.

Impact of operative approach and patient frailty on outcomes for aorto-iliac occlusive disease with critical limb threatening ischemia.

Multiple treatment modalities exist for the management of aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) including endovascular (endo), extra-anatomic bypass (EAB), and anatomic bypass (AB). The goal of this study was to examine the impact of revascularization strategy and patient frailty on outcomes for AIOD in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI and AIOD were identified from the NSQIP database over 5years. Demographics, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were recorded. Modified frailty index (mFI-5) was calculated for each patient. Patients were compared based on the type of procedure and frailty (mFi>0.6). From 2017 to 2021, 1777 patients underwent revascularization for CLTI from AIOD. Patients were majority male (56%) with a mean age of 68. A total of 1346 patients (76%) underwent an open operation of which 669 were EAB. When endo (431 patients) was compared with open repair, endo was associated with a higher incidence of tissue loss at presentation (42% vs 33%, p < 0.001), lower rates of bleeding (6.5% vs 15.5%, p < 0.001), fewer MI/stroke (1.6% vs 4.6%, p = 0.004), and fewer wound complications (2.6% vs 11.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in re-intervention, amputation, or death based on frailty. For frail patients (184 patients), type of repair did not impact re-intervention, major amputation, or mortality, though there was increased MI/stroke with EAB and increased wound complications with AB/EAB. AIOD revascularization strategies for patients with CLTI have similar 30-day re-intervention, major amputation, and mortality rates. Endovascular repair has less surgical wound complications and is better suited for frail patients.

Evaluating the risk of return to the operating room across all elective orthopaedic procedures

BackgroundAlthough elective procedures have life-changing potential, all surgeries come with an inherent risk of reoperation. There is a gap in knowledge investigating the risk of reoperation across orthopaedics. We aimed to identify the elective orthopaedic procedures with the highest rate of unplanned reoperation and the reasons for these procedures having such high reoperation rates.MethodsPatients in the NSQIP database were identified using CPT and ICD-10 codes. We isolated 612,815 orthopaedics procedures from 2018 to 2020 and identified the 10 CPT codes with the greatest rate of unplanned return to the operating room. For each index procedure, we identified the ICD-10 codes for the reoperation procedure and categorized them into infection, mechanical failure, fracture, wound disruption, hematoma or seroma, nerve pathology, other, and unspecified.ResultsBelow knee amputation (BKA) (CPT 27880) had the highest reoperation rate of 6.92% (37 of 535 patients). Posterior-approach thoracic (5.86%) or cervical (4.14%) arthrodesis and cervical laminectomy (3.85%), revision total hip arthroplasty (5.23%), conversion to total hip arthroplasty (4.33%), and revision shoulder arthroplasty (4.22%) were among the remaining highest reoperation rates. The overall leading causes of reoperation were infection (30.1%), mechanical failure (21.1%), and hematoma or seroma (9.4%) for the 10 procedures with the highest reoperation rates.ConclusionsThis study successfully identified the elective orthopaedic procedures with the highest 30-day return to OR rates. These include BKA, posterior thoracic and cervical spinal arthrodesis, revision hip arthroplasty, revision total shoulder arthroplasty, and cervical laminectomy. With this data, we can identify areas across orthopaedics in which revising protocols may improve patient outcomes and limit the burden of reoperations on patients and the healthcare system. Future studies should focus on the long-term physical and financial impact that these reoperations may have on patients and hospital systems.Level of clinical evidenceIV.

Does the Surgical Approach Affect the Incidence of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients? An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Background: The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach.Methods: Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure.Results: A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; P = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; P = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; P < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; P = .003), Clostridium difficile infection (.9% vs .1%; P = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; P < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; P = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; P = .03).Conclusion: A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.

Impact of kidney disease on perioperative outcomes of endoscopic BPH surgery: a propensity score matched analysis from the NSQIP database.

To assess the impact of kidney function in patients with BPH undergoing surgery prior to Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP), Laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP), and Laser Vaporization of the prostate (LVP) on operative and post-operative outcomes using the ACS-NSQIP database. The ACS-NSQIP database was reviewed for patients that underwent TURP, LEP and LVP for treatment of patients with BPH between the years of 2008 and 2021. Demographics, comorbidities, bleeding disorders, operative time, and surgical procedure performed were collected for comparison between Kidney function groups: G1, normal/high function; G2-G3, mild/moderate kidney disease; and G4-G5, severe kidney disease. The 30-day peri-operative complications were measured and a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed while adjusting for all confounding variables. Propensity score matching was performed between the G1 and G4-G5 cohorts. A total of 83,020 patients were included. On multivariable regression, in the G2-G3 cohort, patients were at significantly increased risk for renal complications with OR = 2.43[1.56-3.79]. After propensity score matching, the G4-G5 cohort showed increased odds of pneumonia OR = 4.02[1.343-12.056], renal complications with OR = 7.62[2.283-25.411], cardiac complications OR = 4.53[1.531-13.411], and sepsis/septic shock OR = 1.76[1.091-2.834]. They also had a higher need for blood transfusion OR = 3.58[2.242-5.714], and prolonged hospital stay with OR = 1.49[1.296-1.723]. Pre-operative kidney disease may pose an increased risk of complications for patients undergoing endoscopic BPH surgery. The literature lacks information on the effect of pre-operative kidney disease on endoscopic BPH surgeries. Further studies are required to compare post-operative outcomes of LEP and LVP as compared to TURP across kidney function status.

Utilizing a comprehensive machine learning approach to identify patients at high risk for extended length of stay following spinal deformity surgery in pediatric patients with early onset scoliosis.

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) patient diversity makes outcome prediction challenging. Machine learning offers an innovative approach to analyze patient data and predict results, including LOS in pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Children under 10 with EOS were chosen from the American College of Surgeon's NSQIP database. Extended LOS, defined as over 5days, was predicted using feature selection and machine learning in Python. The best model, determined by the area under the curve (AUC), was optimized and used to create a risk calculator for prolonged LOS. The study included 1587 patients, mostly young (average age: 6.94 ± 2.58years), with 33.1% experiencing prolonged LOS (n = 526). Most patients were female (59.2%, n = 940), with an average BMI of 17.0 ± 8.7. Factors influencing LOS were operative time, age, BMI, ASA class, levels operated on, etiology, nutritional support, pulmonary and neurologic comorbidities. The gradient boosting model performed best with a test accuracy of 0.723, AUC of 0.630, and a Brier score of 0.189, leading to a patient-specific risk calculator for prolonged LOS. Machine learning algorithms accurately predict extended LOS across a national patient cohort and characterize key preoperative drivers of increased LOS after PSIF in pediatric patients with EOS.

Predictors of 30-Day Mortality and Morbidity Following Craniotomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: An ACS NSQIP Database Analysis.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is the leading cause of death among trauma patients. Identifying preoperative factors that predict postoperative outcomes in such patients can guide surgical decision-making. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model using preoperative variables that predicts 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing neurosurgery following TBI. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database was queried between 2005 and 2017 for patients aged 18 years or older who underwent TBI-specific surgery. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcome was a composite morbidity score. Significant variables on univariate analysis with Chi-squared test were used to compute multivariable logistic regression models for both outcomes, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test was used. A total of 1634 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most patients were elderly aged >60 years (74.48%), male (63.59%), of White race (73.62%), and non-Hispanic ethnicity (82.44%). The overall 30-day mortality rate was 20.3%. Using multivariate logistic regression, 11 preoperative variables were significantly associated with 30-day mortality, including (aOR, 95% CI) age 70-79 years (3.38, 2.03-5.62) and age >80 years (7.70, 4.74-12.51), ventilator dependency (6.04, 4.21-8.67), receiving dialysis (4.97, 2.43-10.18), disseminated cancer (4.42, 1.50-13.0), and coma >24 hours (3.30, 1.40-7.80), among others. Similarly, 12 preoperative variables were found to be significantly associated with 30-day morbidity, including acute renal failure (7.10, 1.91-26.32), return to OR (3.82, 2.77-5.27), sepsis (3.27, 1.11-9.66), prior operation within 30 days (2.55, 1.06-4.95), and insulin-dependent diabetes (1.60, 1.06-2.40), among others. After constructing receiver operating characteristic curve, the model for mortality had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.843, whereas composite morbidity had an AUC of 0.716. This model can aid in clinical decision-making for triaging patients based on prognosis in cases of mass casualty events.

30-Day complications, operative time, and overnight admission following elective elbow arthroscopy

Background Although arthroscopic procedures are generally considered safer than open procedures, they are not without complications. This study's purpose is to characterize patient demographics, medical complications, overnight admissions, and prolonged operative times for patients undergoing elective elbow arthroscopy using a national database. Methods This retrospective study used the ACS NSQIP database with data from 2015 to 2020. Patients undergoing elbow arthroscopy were identified, and those undergoing emergent surgery were excluded. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, medical comorbidities, 30-day complications, overnight admission rates, and operative times were recorded and analyzed. Results Overall, 815 patients undergoing elective elbow arthroscopy were included. The mean age was 46.8 years. Mean BMI was 29.7 kg/m2, and 75.2% (n = 613) were male sex. The most common comorbidity was smoking (14.8%, n = 121). The cumulative complication rate was 2.5% (n = 20). The most common complication was surgical site infection (n = 7, 0.9%). 10.7% of patients required at least one overnight hospital stay. 20.2% of patients had a prolonged operative time ≥ 120 min. Conclusion Elbow arthroscopy is not without complications and morbidity despite being a minimally invasive procedure and advances made in surgical technique. Surgeons should use this information to facilitate shared-surgical decision making, preoperative patient counselling, and preoperative patient optimization.

Deaths After Readmissions are Mostly Attributable to Failure-to-Rescue in EGS Patients.

We have recently shown that readmission after EGS procedures carries a 4-fold higher mortality rate when compared to those not readmitted. Understanding factors associated with death after readmission is paramount to improving outcomes for EGS patients. We aimed to identify risk factors contributing to failure-to-rescue (FTR) during readmission after EGS. We hypothesized that most post-readmission deaths in EGS are attributable to FTR. A retrospective cohort study using the NSQIP database 2013-2019 was performed. Patients who underwent 1 of 9 urgent/emergent surgical procedures representing 80% of EGS burden of disease, who were readmitted within 30 days post-procedure were identified. The procedures were classified as low- and high-risk. Patient characteristics analyzed included age, sex, BMI, ASA score comorbidities, postoperative complications, frailty, and FTR. The population was assessed for risk factors associated with mortality and FTR by uni- and multivariate logistic regression. Of 312,862 EGS cases, 16,306 required readmission. Of those, 10,748 (3.4%) developed a postoperative complication. Overall mortality after readmission was 2.4%, with 90.6% of deaths attributable to FTR. Frailty, high-risk procedures, pulmonary complications, AKI, sepsis, and the need for reoperation increased the risk of FTR. Death after a complication is common in EGS readmissions. The impact of FTR could be minimized with the implementation of measures to allow early identification and intervention or prevention of infectious, respiratory, and renal complications.

Neoplastic pathologic hip fractures are associated with a higher risk of post-operative bleeding and thromboembolic events

IntroductionSurgical treatment of hip fractures leads to significant post-operative complications. Although pathologic fractures (PF) are associated with worse outcomes, most studies do not differentiate between etiology (neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF). We seek to compare 30-day complication rates between 1) native hip fractures and neoplastic PF, and 2) neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF. Materials and methodsA total of 127,819 patients with hip fractures and 5104 with PF diagnosed from 2005 to 2021 were retrieved from the NSQIP database. We included 1843 patients with neoplastic PF and 3261 with non-neoplastic PF. Demographics, pre-operative labs and co-morbidities, and post-operative outcomes were analyzed. Propensity-score matching was conducted to control for confounders. ResultsPatients with a neoplastic PF had a significantly higher rate of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (4 % vs 1.2 %, p = 0.001) and pulmonary embolism (PE) (2.4 % vs 0.7 %, p < 0.001), than native hip fractures. Rates of post-operative bleeding were significantly higher in the neoplastic PF group (29.3 % vs 23.9 %, p < 0.001) than non-neoplastic PF. No differences in soft tissue complications were found. When comparing neoplastic and non-neoplastic PF, the former had a higher rate of PE (2.5 % vs 1.0 %, p = 0.015) and post-operative bleeding (27.6 % vs 22.0 %, p = 0.009). Unplanned readmission rates and 30-day mortality rate were also higher in the neoplastic PF group. ConclusionNeoplastic PF of the hip are associated with higher risk of thromboembolic event rates and post-operative bleeding than both native hip fractures and non-neoplastic PF. No differences in rates of soft tissue complications were found between groups.