NRAS Mutations In Melanoma Research Articles

NRAS mutation in melanoma: Association of codon-specific changes on patient outcomes.

e21545 Background: NRAS mutant melanoma is an aggressive subtype making up 20-30% of cutaneous melanoma cases without specific treatment options beyond immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). Previous studies have suggested specific NRAS codon mutations are associated with unique signaling pathways. To test the hypothesis that NRAS codon mutations in cutaneous melanoma may drive a preferential response to ICI, we evaluated specific genetic subsets of NRAS mutant melanoma based on the Q61 and G12/G13 codons. Methods: Cutaneous melanoma samples (n = 4091) were analyzed by NGS at Caris Life Sciences. Samples were stratified by NRAS status and subdivided into NRASQ61, NRASG12/13, and NRAS-wildtype. PD-L1 expression was assessed using IHC (positive ≥ 1%). TMB-high was defined as ≥ 10 mutations/Mb. Transcriptomic signatures of MAPK pathway activation and T-cell signatures were calculated. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) information was obtained from insurance claims data, with Kaplan-Meier estimates calculated from time on ICI until last date of contact. Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were applied as appropriate, with p-values adjusted for multiple comparisons. Results: Cutaneous melanoma samples were comprised of 22% NRASQ61 (n = 902), 3.1% NRASG12/13 (n = 125) and 74.8% NRASWT (n = 3064), with the most common NRAS mutation being Q61R. Patients harboring NRASG12/13 codon changes were associated with concurrent mutations in BRAF (21.0 vs 6.4%, p< 0.0001), NF1 (50.5% vs 8.7%, p< 0.0001), KIT (3.2% vs 0.2%, p< 0.001), ARID2 (22.1% vs 11.3%, p< 0.01), MAP2K1 (7.2% vs 2.6%, p = 0.022) compared to NRASQ61. NRASG12/13 tumors were more frequently TMB-high compared to NRASQ61 or NRASWT (83.1% vs 62.1% vs 55.1%, p = 0.0001), but no difference was observed in the prevalence of dMMR/MSI-H or PD-L1 expression. Transcriptomic analysis showed that NRASQ61 mutants had a significantly higher MPAS compared to NRASG12/13 or NRASWT cohorts (Median: 1.16 vs 0.67 vs 0.46, p = 0.0147), while T-cell-inflamed scores were significantly higher in NRASWT compared to NRASQ61 (Median: 4 vs -40, p = 0.00492) but not to NRASG12/13 (Median: 4 vs -13.5, p = 0.674). No difference in rwOS was identified in NRASG12/13 and NRASQ61 melanoma treated with ICI (HR: 0.753, [95% CI: 0.43 – 1.31], p = 0.316). Conclusions: Patients with NRAS-mutated cutaneous melanoma exhibit codon-specific ( NRASQ61 vs NRASG12/13) signaling and prevalence of immunotherapy-related biomarkers. Our findings indicate that melanoma samples with NRASG12/13 mutation tend to exhibit immune richness suggesting they could be viewed as a distinct group that might potentially benefit from immune therapies. This observation offers valuable insight into codon-specific tumor subsets, differential response to therapy, resistance mechanisms, and the potential development of combination therapies to enhance survival outcomes of patients with NRAS mutant melanoma.

Assessment of RAS-RAF-MAPK Pathway Mutation Status in Healthy Skin, Benign Nevi, and Cutaneous Melanomas: Pilot Study Using Droplet Digital PCR.

In the present study, we employed the ddPCR and IHC techniques to assess the prevalence and roles of RAS and RAF mutations in a small batch of melanoma (n = 22), benign moles (n = 15), and normal skin samples (n = 15). Mutational screening revealed the coexistence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanomas and nevi and the occurrence of NRAS G12/G13 variants in healthy skin. All investigated nevi had driver mutations in the BRAF or NRAS genes and elevated p16 protein expression, indicating cell cycle arrest despite an increased mutational burden. BRAF V600 mutations were identified in 54% of melanomas, and NRAS G12/G13 mutations in 50%. The BRAF mutations were associated with the Breslow index (BI) (p = 0.029) and TIL infiltration (p = 0.027), whereas the NRAS mutations correlated with the BI (p = 0.01) and the mitotic index (p = 0.04). Here, we demonstrate that the "young" ddPCR technology is as effective as a CE-IVD marked real-time PCR method for detecting BRAF V600 hotspot mutations in tumor biopsies and recommend it for extended use in clinical settings. Moreover, ddPCR was able to detect low-frequency hotspot mutations, such as NRAS G12/G13, in our tissue specimens, which makes it a promising tool for investigating the mutational landscape of sun-damaged skin, benign nevi, and melanomas in more extensive clinical studies.

Low incidence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in a population with a high incidence of melanoma

Reported rates of BRAF mutation in Irish cutaneous melanoma cohorts are lower than the reported international data. We aimed to assess the mutational status of a cohort of primary cutaneous melanomas and to correlate it with clinical follow-up data.A total of 92 cases of primary cutaneous melanoma diagnosed at a single institution in 2012 were analyzed. Regions containing common mutations in the BRAF, NRAS, KIT, and KRAS genes were investigated by PCR amplification followed by Sanger sequencing. Demographic details, tumor characteristics, and 10-year outcome data were also obtained.Ten cases with BRAF V600E mutations (11.6%) and five (5.49%) NRAS mutations (4 at Q61R, 1 at Q61K) were detected. No statistically significant differences were noted between groups for age, gender, depth of invasion, nodal status, or recurrence status (p ≥ 0.05).These findings suggest that the Irish population has a markedly lower incidence of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma than those reported in other cohorts.

Abstract CT197: Phase Ib study of LXH254 + trametinib (TMT) in patients (pts) with NRAS-mutant melanoma

Abstract Background: MAPK pathway dysregulation is a characteristic molecular abnormality of melanoma. NRAS mutations in melanoma lead to constitutive MAPK activation and subsequent MEK and ERK activation. Inhibiting the pathway with a combination of BRAF/CRAF and MEK inhibitors (LXH254 and TMT, respectively) has demonstrated synergistic activity in preclinical models of NRAS-mutant melanoma. Methods: We report data from an open-label, Phase Ib study (NCT02974725), that tested LXH254 + TMT combination in a dose-escalation (ESC) part in pts with KRAS- or BRAF-mutant NSCLC or NRAS-mutant melanoma and in a dose-expansion (EXP) part in NRAS-mutant melanoma pts. In ESC, five dose levels were explored: LXH254 200 mg twice daily (BID) + TMT (1 mg or 0.5 mg) daily (QD); LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT (1 mg or 0.5 mg) QD; LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 1 mg (QD, 2 wk on/2 wk off). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, and determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE). Secondary objectives were to characterize pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LXH254 + TMT, and evaluate antitumor activity. Results: As of Dec 9, 2021, 36 and 30 pts were enrolled in ESC and EXP, respectively; median age was 63.5 and 69 y, respectively. Pts in ESC and EXP received a median of 3 (range: 1-6) and 2 (range: 1-7) prior treatments, respectively, including IO (ESC: 88.9% pts; EXP: 96.7% pts). All pts from ESC and 24 pts from EXP discontinued, mainly due to progressive disease (61.1% and 60%, respectively); 6 pts were ongoing in EXP at data cut-off. In ESC, Grade ≥3 (G≥3) DLTs were reported in 6 pts: dermatitis acneiform (n=2), maculopapular rash (n=2), increased lipase (n=1), and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (n=1). The RDEs were LXH254 200 mg BID + TMT 1 mg QD and LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 0.5 mg QD. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 34 pts (94.4%) in ESC and all pts in EXP. G≥3 TRAEs in ESC and EXP were experienced by 19 (52.8%) and 24 (80%) pts, respectively; the most common being rash or dermatitis acneiform (13.9% each) in ESC and rash (33.3%) in EXP. One fatal TRAE (hypovolemic shock) was reported in the LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 0.5 mg QD group. The ORR in EXP was 46.7% (7 pts; 95% CI: 21.3-73.4) for LXH254 200 mg BID + TMT 1 mg QD and 13.3% (2 pts; 95% CI: 1.7-40.5) for LXH254 400 mg BID + TMT 0.5 mg QD; overall in EXP, 9 pts (30%) achieved PR and 13 pts (43.3%) reported SD. In EXP the median DOR was 3.8 months (95% CI: 2.6-7.4). Exposures of LXH254 (200 mg or 400 mg BID) + TMT (0.5 mg or 1 mg QD) vs LXH254 single agent were comparable, indicating no apparent LXH254-TMT interactions. Limited paired tumor biopsy data (n=8) showed substantial MAPK pathway inhibition (DUSP6). Conclusions: LXH254 in combination with TMT has shown preliminary antitumor activity in the pretreated, NRAS-mutant melanoma population. A Phase II trial of LXH254 combinations in pts with pretreated BRAF- or NRAS-mutant melanoma is currently ongoing (NCT04417621). Citation Format: Filippo de Braud, Christophe Dooms, Rebecca S. Heist, Celeste Lebbe, Martin Wermke, David Planchard, Dirk Schadendorf, Piotr Rutkowski, Jürgen Wolf, Paolo A. Ascierto, Ignacio Gil-Bazo, Shumei Kato, Maria Wolodarski, Meredith McKean, Eva Muñoz Couselo, Martin Sebastian, Armando Santoro, Vesselina Cooke, Luca Manganelli, Kitty Wan, Anil Gaur, Tanay S. Samant, Jaeyeon Kim, Giordano Caponigro, Xuân-Mai Couillebault, Michele Moschetta, Adil Daud. Phase Ib study of LXH254 + trametinib (TMT) in patients (pts) with NRAS-mutant melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT197.

NRASQ61K melanoma tumor formation is reduced by p38-MAPK14 activation in zebrafish models and NRAS-mutated human melanoma cells.

Oncogenic BRAF and NRAS mutations drive human melanoma initiation. We used transgenic zebrafish to model NRAS-mutant melanoma, and the rapid tumor onset allowed us to study candidate tumor suppressors. We identified P38α-MAPK14 as a potential tumor suppressor in The Cancer Genome Atlas melanoma cohort of NRAS-mutant melanomas, and overexpression significantly increased the time to tumor onset in transgenic zebrafish with NRAS-driven melanoma. Pharmacological activation of P38α-MAPK14 using anisomycin reduced in vitro viability of melanoma cultures, which we confirmed by stable overexpression of p38α. We observed that the viability of MEK inhibitor resistant melanoma cells could be reduced by combined treatment of anisomycin and MEK inhibition. Our study demonstrates that activating the p38α-MAPK14 pathway in the presence of oncogenic NRAS abrogates melanoma in vitro and in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE: The significance of our study is in the accountability of NRAS mutations in melanoma. We demonstrate here that activation of p38α-MAPK14 pathway can abrogate NRAS-mutant melanoma which is contrary to the previously published role of p38α-MAPK14 pathway in BRAF mutant melanoma. These results implicate that BRAF and NRAS-mutant melanoma may not be identical biologically. We also demonstrate the translational benefit of our study by using a small molecule compound-anisomycin (already in use for other diseases in clinical trials) to activate p38α-MAPK14 pathway.

DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF A HIGHLY SENSITIVE PNA CLAMP PCR ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF NRAS MUTATIONS IN MELANOMA USING TISSUE AND CFDNA

Melanoma is known to be one of the common cutaneous cancers worldwide. NRAS mutations are found in 15%–20% of melanomas. Non-NRAS-mutant subset of melanoma is less aggressive and associated with higher outcomes in comparison to NRAS- mutant melanoma. New treatment methods for this subset might be developed with improved understanding of NRAS-mutant melanoma. Therefore, a highly sensitive technique for detection of NRAS mutation in melanoma is imperative. The aims of this research were to develop a highly sensitive PCR assay to detect low tumour cell percentage in formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue and plasma. The assay was developed on stable cell lines containing NRAS (codon 61) mutations. Peptide nucelic acide (PNA) Clamp PCR was used for the selective amplification of DNA target sequences. Total DNA was extracted from 48 FFPE tissues and 20 blood plasma (14 matched) stage II-IV tumours and screened for NRAS mutations. PNA Clamp PCR on FFPE tissue showed 25% (n=12) NRAS mutant of which p.Q61R c.182A>G was the most frequent. Sample cases were independently tested. For NRAS Circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA) analysis only one case was mutated. This demonstrates an innovative and highly sensitive technique for the detection of the common driver mutations in melanoma using exceptionally low tumour burden samples, representing a useful tool for future research and clinical application.

Associations of MC1R Genotype and Patient Phenotypes with BRAF and NRAS Mutations in Melanoma

Associations of MC1R with BRAF mutations in melanoma have been inconsistent between studies. We sought to determine for 1,227 participants in the international population-based Genes, Environment, and Melanoma (GEM) study whether MC1R and phenotypes were associated with melanoma BRAF/NRAS subtypes. We used logistic regression adjusted by age, sex, and study design features and examined effect modifications. BRAF+ were associated with younger age, blond/light brown hair, increased nevi, and less freckling, and NRAS+ with older age relative to the wild type (BRAF-/NRAS-) melanomas (all P < 0.05). Comparing specific BRAF subtypes to the wild type, BRAF V600E was associated with younger age, blond/light brown hair, and increased nevi and V600K with increased nevi and less freckling (all P < 0.05). MC1R was positively associated with BRAF V600E cases but only among individuals with darker phototypes or darker hair (Pinteraction < 0.05) but inversely associated with BRAF V600K (Ptrend= 0.006) with no significant effect modification by phenotypes. These results support distinct etiologies for BRAF V600E, BRAF V600K, NRAS+, and wild-type melanomas. MC1R's associations with BRAF V600E cases limited to individuals with darker phenotypes indicate that MC1R genotypes specifically provide information about BRAF V600E melanoma risk in those not considered high risk based on phenotype. Our results also suggest that melanin pathways deserve further study in BRAF V600E melanomagenesis.

Prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma: a German study from routine care

BackgroundHotspot mutations of the oncogenes BRAF and NRAS are the most common genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma. Specific inhibitors of BRAF and MEK have shown significant survival benefits in large phase III trials. However, the prognostic significance of BRAF and NRAS mutations outside of clinical trials remains unclear.MethodsThe mutational status of BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exon 2 and 3) was determined in melanoma samples of 217 patients with pyrosequencing and Sanger sequencing. The genotypes were correlated with clinical outcomes and pathologic features of the primary tumors. Time to disease progression was calculated with the cumulative incidence function. Survival analyses were performed with Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Relative survival was calculated with the Ederer-II method. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) was allowed.ResultsMutations in BRAF and NRAS were identified in 40.1 and 24.4% of cases, respectively. Concurrent mutations in both genes were detected in further 2.3%. The remaining 33.2% were wild type for the investigated exons (WT). BRAF mutations were significantly associated with younger age at first diagnosis (p < 0.001) and truncal localization of the culprit primary (p = 0.002). The nodular subtype was most common in the NRAS cohort. In addition, NRAS-mutant melanoma patients showed a higher frequency of nodal relapse (p = 0.013) and development of metastatic disease (p = 0.021). The time to loco-regional nodal relapse was shortest in NRAS-mutant melanoma (p = 0.002). Presence of NRAS mutation was an independent risk factor for disease progression in multivariate analysis (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.02 – 3.98). BRAF-mutant melanoma patients showed a tendency for better overall and relative survival. Genotype was not a consistent risk factor in multivariate analysis. Instead, positive sentinel lymph node status (HR 2.65; 95% CI 1.15 – 6.10) and treatment with ICB in stage IV disease (HR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06–0.48) were significant multivariate risk factors.ConclusionsNRAS-mutant tumors tended to behave more aggressively particularly in early stages of the disease in this high-risk melanoma population. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade improved survival in stage IV disease in a real-world setting.

NRASQ61R Mutation-specific Immunohistochemistry is Highly Specific for Either NRASQ61R or KRASQ61R Mutation in Colorectal Carcinoma.

Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy is only indicated in RAS wild-type colorectal carcinomas (CRCs). It is recommended that both NRAS and KRAS mutation testing to be performed before a CRC is considered RAS wild-type. Given that mutation-specific immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been shown to be sensitive and specific for the detection of NRAS mutations in melanoma, we assessed the specificity of NRAS mutation-specific IHC in CRC. IHC was performed on tissue microarrays containing 2823 consecutive CRC undergoing surgery with curative intent using a novel mutation-specific antibody to the protein produced by the NRAS mutation (clone SP174). Tissue microarrays were assessed by 2 observers and all IHC-positive or equivocal cases were repeated on whole sections to confirm the result. Positive cases then underwent molecular testing by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight polymerase chain reaction. In total, 22 of 2823 (0.8%) CRCs demonstrated confirmed positive staining with complete interobserver concordance. RAS mutations were confirmed in all IHC-positive CRCs. In total, 11 cases harbored the NRASQ61R mutation. Surprisingly, 11 cases demonstrated the KRASQ61R mutation. We conclude that mutation-specific IHC with this currently available NRASQ61R antibody is highly specific for the presence of either NRASQ61R or KRASQ61R mutations in CRC. We caution that we did not assess the sensitivity of IHC and that this antibody does not detect other RAS mutations. Therefore, negative staining does not exclude a clinically significant RAS mutation. However, positive staining confirms the presence of an NRASQ61R or KRASQ61R mutation without the need for further molecular testing.

MUG-Mel2, a novel highly pigmented and well characterized NRAS mutated human melanoma cell line

NRAS mutation in melanoma has been associated with aggressive tumor biology and poor prognosis. Although targeted therapy has been tested for NRAS mutated melanoma, response rates still appear much weaker, than in BRAF mutated melanoma. While plenty of cell lines exist, however, only few melanogenic cell lines retain their in vivo characteristics. In this work we present an intensively pigmented and well-characterized cell line derived from a highly aggressive NRAS mutated cutaneous melanoma, named MUG-Mel2. We present the clinical course, unique morphology, angiogenic properties, growth characteristics using in vivo experiments and 3D cell culture, and results of the exome gene sequencing of an intensively pigmented melanogenic cell line MUG-Mel2, derived from a cutaneous metastasis of an aggressive NRAS p. Q61R mutated melanoma. Amongst several genetic alterations, mutations in GRIN2A, CREBP, PIK3C2G, ATM, and ATR were present. These mutations, known to reinforce DNA repair problems in melanoma, might serve as potential treatment targets. The aggressive and fast growing behavior in animal models and the obtained phenotype in 3D culture reveal a perfect model for research in the field of NRAS mutated melanoma.

Results of NEMO: A phase III trial of binimetinib (BINI) vs dacarbazine (DTIC) in NRAS-mutant cutaneous melanoma.

9500Background: NRAS mutation in melanoma occurs in ~20% of patients (pts). There are no specific therapies for NRAS melanoma. Despite emergence of immunotherapies (ITs) as effective treatments in ...

Abstract 1087: Differential oncogenicity of N-RAS mutations in melanoma.

Abstract In human cancer, N-RAS mutations resulting in constitutive, oncogenic signaling are predominately localized to codons 12, 13 or 61. Traditionally, activating RAS mutations have been considered oncogenically equivalent, yet recent studies suggest important clinical distinctions between colon cancers containing K-RAS codon 12 vs. codon 13 mutations. More than 20% of human melanomas harbor N-RAS mutations, the vast majority of which target codon 61, as opposed to N-RAS mutations of codon 12 or 13, which are common in other tumor types. To address this issue, we characterized syngeneic knock-in mouse models conditionally expressing either N-RasG12D or N-RasQ61R under the control of the endogenous locus. In primary melanocyte cultures, activation of either N-Ras allele reduced cellular proliferation even in the presence of concomitant p16INK4a deletion. Correspondingly, melanocyte-specific N-RasG12D expression combined with p16INK4a loss failed to efficiently promote melanoma formation in mice. In contrast, melanocyte-specific N-RasQ61R induction readily combined with p16INK4a loss to promote melanoma formation in vivo with short latency and high penetrance. These results provide a first murine model of melanoma featuring knock-in N-Ras mutationQ61R, and suggest that the preference for codon 61 mutations in human tumors is conserved in mice. Citation Format: Christin Burd, William R. Jeck, Kailing Fu, Kelly S. Clark, Jessie C. Xiong, George P. Souroullas, Norman E. Sharpless. Differential oncogenicity of N-RAS mutations in melanoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1087. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1087

Abstract 3374: BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma regulate the phosphorylation and inactivation of RKIP, the metastasis suppressor and immune surveillance cancer gene product

Abstract The Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein (RKIP) is a member of the phosphatidylethanolamine binding protein family (PEBP). RKIP binds to Raf-1 and prevents the activation of the ERK 1/2 cascade. RKIP expression is diminished in many primary cancers and is absent in many metastases. RKIP overexpression inhibits experimental metastases, hence, termed a metastasis suppressor. In addition, overexpression of RKIP reverses tumor cell resistance to drug-induced apoptosis, hence, termed an immune surveillance cancer gene product. Phosphorylation of RKIP (pRKIP) at Ser 153 by PKCs dissociates RKIP from Raf-1 (inactivating RKIP) and pRKIP binds to G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2, a kinase that inhibits G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and resulting in the inhibition of GRK2 activity and stimulation of the ERK 1/2 activity. Over 90% of melanoma express oncogene mutations in BRAF and also express mutations in NRAS. Most of the transforming activity of these mutations results from the activation of MAPK. The roles of such mutations in the regulation of oncogenes involved in metastasis and resistance are not clear. The objective of this study was to initiate investigations on the roles of above mutations on the expression of RKIP and inactive pRKIP. We hypothesized that BRAF and NRAS mutations, through their activation of PKCs, will result in the phosphorylation and inactivation of RKIP and potentiation of ERK 1/2 activation, metastasis and drug resistance. In this study, we have examined a large panel of melanoma cell lines with no mutations and with BRAF and/or NRAS mutations using a Tissue microarray technology. The expression of both RKIP and pRKIP was examined and the evaluation of protein expression was performed by IHC and analyzed by blinded observers under light microscopy. While anti-RKIP antibody detects both RKIP and pRKIP, anti-pRKIP was specific for pRKIP. The mean intensities for the expression of each protein were determined using the software Image-ProPlus 6.3. In brief, five random fields of each cell line were evaluated at 400-magnification. From the IHC staining, general density expressions of each protein in the cell lines were measured in pixels/200 μm2. The data revealed that the majority (75%) of RKIP expression was in its phosphorylated form in cell lines with BRAF and NRAS mutations. These studies suggest that in melanoma cell lines with mutations, GRK2 is inactivated through its association with pRKIP and, thus, maintaining the activating signals mediated by GPCRs. Further, pRKIP expression may potentiate the metastatic potential and drug resistance. We propose that selective inhibitors of PKCs may elevate the expression of RKIP and result in the inhibition of the metastatic potential as well as in the sensitization of the tumor cells to subtoxic therapeutic drugs. These studies are currently being examined in our laboratories. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3374.

Differential oncogenic potential of activated RAS isoforms in melanocytes

RAS genes are mutated in approximately 30% of all human cancers. Interestingly, there exists a strong bias in favor of mutation of only one of the three major RAS genes in tumors of different cellular origins. NRAS mutations occur in approximately 20% of human melanomas, whereas HRAS and KRAS mutations are rare in this disease. To define the mechanism(s) responsible for this preference in melanocytes, we compared the transformation efficiencies of mutant NRAS and KRAS in immortal, non-transformed Ink4a/Arf-deficient melanocytes. NRAS mutation leads to increased cellular proliferation and is potently tumorigenic. In contrast, KRAS mutation does not enhance melanocyte proliferation and is only weakly tumorigenic on its own. Although both NRAS and KRAS activate mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, only NRAS enhances MYC activity in these cells. Our data suggest that the activity of specific RAS isoforms is context-dependent and provide a possible explanation for the prevalence of NRAS mutations in melanoma. In addition, understanding this mechanism will have important implications for cancer therapies targeting RAS pathways.

Phenotypic characteristics in relationship to BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma

Phenotypic characteristics in relationship to BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma

BRAF and NRAS mutations in melanoma and melanocytic nevi

In this report, we investigated BRAF/NRAS mutations in samples from a case-control study of melanoma and a series of benign melanocytic nevi. We evaluated potential associations between BRAF mutations and histopathologic and pigmentary characteristics of melanoma. Mutations in BRAF and NRAS were detected by sequencing microdissected/laser-captured DNA from 18 in-situ melanomas, 64 primary melanomas, and 51 nevi. Nevi showed the highest frequency of BRAF mutations (82%). BRAF mutations were identified in 29% of invasive melanomas and in only 5.6% of in-situ melanomas. Mutations in NRAS were found in 5.2% of primary melanomas, 5.9% of nevi and no NRAS mutations were seen in in-situ melanomas. A majority of the BRAF mutations observed in primary invasive melanoma were seen in superficial spreading melanoma (15/17), and melanomas with BRAF mutations were also more likely to be found on a body site that was likely to be exposed to intermittent sun exposure compared with chronic or no sun exposure (P=0.02). Tumors with BRAF mutations were also significantly more likely to occur in association with a contiguous nevus (odds ratio 3.49, 95% confidence interval 1.06-11.46), although a contiguous nevus was not found in all melanomas with a BRAF mutation. Our data support the evidence that the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is upregulated in a large percentage of melanocytic lesions, but these mutations are not sufficient for malignant transformation. We suggest that BRAF mutations contribute to benign melanocytic hyperplasia, but are likely to contribute to invasive melanoma only in conjunction with other mutations.

BRAF and NRAS mutations are uncommon in melanomas arising in diverse internal organs

Background: Malignant melanoma arising from different body compartments may be associated with differing aetiological factors and clinical behaviour, and may manifest diverse molecular genetic profiles. Although many studies have focused...

Frequency of UV-inducible NRAS mutations in melanomas of patients with germline CDKN2A mutations.

Germline alterations in cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) are important genetic factors in familial predisposition to melanoma. Activating mutations of the NRAS proto-oncogene are among the most common somatic genetic alterations in cutaneous malignant melanomas. We investigated the occurrence of NRAS mutations in melanomas and dysplastic nevi in individuals with germline CDKN2A mutations. Genomic DNA was extracted from 39 biopsy samples (including primary melanomas, metastatic melanomas, and dysplastic nevi) from 25 patients in six Swedish families with a hereditary predisposition to melanoma who carried germline CDKN2A mutations. DNA was also extracted from 10 biopsy samples from patients with sporadic melanomas. NRAS was analyzed using polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis, and nucleotide sequence analysis. Differences in NRAS mutation frequency between hereditary and sporadic melanomas were analyzed by the chi-square test. All statistical tests were two-sided. Activating mutations in NRAS codon 61, all of which were either CAA(Gln)-AAA(Lys) or CAA(Gln)-CGA(Arg) mutations, were found in 95% (20/21) of primary hereditary melanomas but in only 10% (1/10) of sporadic melanomas (P<.001). Multiple activating NRAS mutations were detected in tumor cells from different regions of individual primary melanomas in nine patients. Activating mutations that were detected in the primary melanomas of these patients were also retained in their metastases. NRAS mutations at sites other than codon 61 were also present in the primary melanomas, indicating genetic instability of this locus. NRAS codon 61 mutations were also detected in dysplastic nevi and in an in situ melanoma, suggesting a role for such mutations during early melanoma development. The high frequency of NRAS codon 61 mutations detected in these hereditary melanomas may be the result of a hypermutability phenotype associated with a hereditary predisposition for melanoma development in patients with germline CDKN2A mutations.