Noxious Unconditioned Stimulus Research Articles

Effect of conditioned stimulus exposure during slow-wave sleep on fear memory extinction in humans

STUDY OBJECTIVES Repeated exposure to a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) in the absence of a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US) elicits fear memory extinction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of mild tone exposure (CS) during slow wave sleep (SWS) on fear memory extinction in humans. DESIGN The healthy volunteers underwent an auditory fear conditioning paradigm on the experimental night, during which tones served as the CS, and a mild shock served as the US. They were then randomly assigned to four groups. Three groups were exposed to the CS for 3 or 10 min or an irrelevant tone (control stimulus, CtrS) for 10 min during SWS. The fourth group served as controls and was not subjected to any interventions. All of the subjects completed a memory test 4 h after SWS-rich stage to evaluate the effect on fear extinction. Moreover, we conducted similar experiments using an independent group of subjects during the daytime to test whether the memory extinction effect was specific to the sleep condition. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-six healthy volunteers (44 males) aged 18-28 y. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS Participants exhibited undisturbed sleep during 2 consecutive nights, as assessed by sleep variables (all P > 0.05) from polysomnographic recordings and power spectral analysis. Participants who were re-exposed to the 10 min CS either during SWS and wakefulness exhibited attenuated fear responses (wake-10 min CS, P < 0.05; SWS-10 min CS, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Conditioned stimulus re-exposure during SWS promoted fear memory extinction without altering sleep profiles.

Effect of conditioned stimulus exposure during slow wave sleep on fear memory extinction in humans.

Repeated exposure to a neutral conditioned stimulus (CS) in the absence of a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US) elicits fear memory extinction. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effects of mild tone exposure (CS) during slow wave sleep (SWS) on fear memory extinction in humans. The healthy volunteers underwent an auditory fear conditioning paradigm on the experimental night, during which tones served as the CS, and a mild shock served as the US. They were then randomly assigned to four groups. Three groups were exposed to the CS for 3 or 10 min or an irrelevant tone (control stimulus, CtrS) for 10 min during SWS. The fourth group served as controls and was not subjected to any interventions. All of the subjects completed a memory test 4 h after SWS-rich stage to evaluate the effect on fear extinction. Moreover, we conducted similar experiments using an independent group of subjects during the daytime to test whether the memory extinction effect was specific to the sleep condition. Ninety-six healthy volunteers (44 males) aged 18-28 y. Participants exhibited undisturbed sleep during 2 consecutive nights, as assessed by sleep variables (all P > 0.05) from polysomnographic recordings and power spectral analysis. Participants who were re-exposed to the 10 min CS either during SWS and wakefulness exhibited attenuated fear responses (wake-10 min CS, P < 0.05; SWS-10 min CS, P < 0.01). Conditioned stimulus re-exposure during SWS promoted fear memory extinction without altering sleep profiles.

The α 2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine suppresses memory formation only at doses attenuating the perception of sensory input

It was investigated whether continuous rate infusion of the α 2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine can suppress memory formation by mechanisms other than reducing perception of sensory input in a fear-conditioning paradigm. Different groups of rats infused with either saline or dexmedetomidine (2.0, 4.0 or 10.0 µg/kg bolus, followed by 2.0, 4.0 or 10.0 µg/kg/h continuous rate infusion respectively), were subjected to a somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) fear-conditioning paradigm. This paradigm combined the pairing of an innoxious conditioned stimulus (CS) and a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US), of which the latter was used to generate the SEPs (training phase).The following day, the perception of the US during the training phase was assessed by presenting the CS only and subsequently scoring the resulting duration of freezing behaviour (testing phase). Freezing behaviour was reduced only in those groups which demonstrated reduced SEPs. Based on these findings, it is concluded that dexmedetomidine suppresses memory formation only at doses reducing central nervous system activity in response to sensory input.

Differential Classical Conditioning of the Gill-Withdrawal Reflex inAplysiaRecruits Both NMDA Receptor-Dependent Enhancement and NMDA Receptor-Dependent Depression of the Reflex

Differential classical conditioning of the gill-withdrawal response (GWR) in Aplysia can be elicited by training in which a conditioned stimulus (CS) delivered to one side of the siphon (the CS+) is paired with a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US; tail shock), while a second conditioned stimulus (the CS-), delivered to a different siphon site, is unpaired with the US. NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation has been shown previously to be critical for nondifferential classical conditioning in Aplysia. Here, we used a semi-intact preparation to test whether differential classical conditioning of the GWR also depends on activation of NMDARs. Differential training produced conditioned enhancement of the reflexive response to the CS+ and a reduction in the response to the CS-. Comparison of the results after differential training with those after training in which only the two CSs were presented (CS-alone experiments) indicated that the decrement in the response to CS- after differential training was not caused by habituation. Surprisingly, differential training in the NMDAR antagonist APV (DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate) blocked not only the conditioned enhancement of the GWR, but also the conditioning-induced depression of the GWR. We suggest that differential conditioning involves an NMDAR-dependent, competitive interaction between the separate neural pathways activated by the CS+ and CS-.

Differential fear conditioning induces reciprocal changes in the sensory responses of lateral amygdala neurons to the CS(+) and CS(-).

In classical fear conditioning, a neutral sensory stimulus (CS) acquires the ability to elicit fear responses after pairing to a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US). As amygdala lesions prevent the acquisition of fear responses and the lateral amygdaloid (LA) nucleus is the main input station of the amygdala for auditory afferents, the effect of auditory fear conditioning on the sensory responsiveness of LA neurons has been examined. Although conditioning was shown to increase CS-evoked LA responses, the specificity of the changes in responsiveness was not tested. Because conditioning might induce nonspecific increases in LA responses to auditory afferents, we re-examined this issue in conscious, head-restrained cats using a differential conditioning paradigm where only one of two tones (CS(+) but not CS(-)) was paired to the US. Differential conditioning increased unit and field responses to the CS(+), whereas responses to the CS(-) decreased. Such changes have never been observed in the amygdala except in cases where the CS(-) had been paired to the US before and fear responses not extinguished. This suggests that fear conditioning is not only accompanied by potentiation of amygdalopetal pathways conveying the CS(+) but also by the depression of sensory inputs unpaired to noxious stimuli.

Differential expression of pseudoconditioning and sensitization by siphon responses in Aplysia: novel response selection after training

Nonassociative training with a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US) applied to the head or tail of freely moving Aplysia caused a qualitative change in siphon responses to midbody test stimulation, so that the midbody test responses came to resemble the unconditioned siphon response (UR) to the US when tested 1 d after exposure to the US. Such a nonassociative, US-induced transformation of test responses into responses resembling the UR has traditionally been termed "pseudoconditioning." Short-term pseudoconditioning was compared to sensitization and to habituation in a reduced preparation that used a photocell to distinguish "head-type" siphon responses from qualitatively different "tail-type" responses. Transformation of test responses (pseudoconditioning) was observed only when the type of preexisting alpha response to the midbody test stimulus was different from the UR. Sensitization, defined as a US-induced enhancement of the alpha response to the test stimulus, was observed when the initial alpha response and the UR were of the same type. General sensory facilitation was excluded as a critical mechanism for pseudoconditioning by the observation that the same midbody test response could be transformed to either a head-type or tail-type response, depending on the site of the US, and by the observation that simply increasing the intensity of the midbody test stimulus in the absence of a head or tail US did not produce similar response transformations. These studies demonstrate pseudoconditioning in a preparation amenable to analysis at the level of identified neurons, and draw attention to a distinctive and widespread form of behavioral modifiability that has been neglected by investigators of learning.

Multiple sensory neuronal correlates of site-specific sensitization in Aplysia

Noxious stimulation of a restricted site on the skin of Aplysia (training) causes site-specific sensitization of the tail-withdrawal reflex that is associated with several sensory correlates that are evident both 10 min and 2 hr after training. First, extracellularly recorded afferent activity evoked by test stimulation of the trained site increases, indicating peripheral sensory changes. Second, central sensory alterations are manifested by tail sensory neurons within the pleural VC cluster that innervate the trained site and are activated during training. These mechanosensory/nociceptive cells display a number of differences from unactivated tail sensory neurons innervating other sites: slow depolarization of the soma observed immediately after training, decrease in soma action potential threshold, and enhancement of monosynaptic EPSPs to identified motor neurons. Noxious stimulation of a more extensive region also produces site-specific sensitization of the tail-withdrawal reflex and site-specific enhancement of EPSP amplitude measured 1 d after training. This training produced a novel cellular correlate of behavioral enhancement in Aplysia--regenerative bursting responses (2-35 spikes) in response to brief depolarization of the sensory neuron soma. The changes in peripheral and central excitability appear similar to changes associated with mammalian models of primary hyperalgesia. Site-specific enhancement of nociceptive signaling also occurs during aversive associative conditioning in a noxious unconditioned stimulus (US) pathway. These site-specific changes involve activity-dependent extrinsic modulation (ADEM) of the VC sensory neurons, suggesting a close relationship to changes underlying associative conditioning in conditioned stimulus (CS) pathways in Aplysia.

The role of stimulus intensity and stress in opioid-mediated analgesia

Rats exposed to a Pavlovian conditioning paradigm developed naloxone-reversible analgesia only when the intensity of a noxious unconditioned stimulus was suprathreshold and the level of stress was augmented. The time course of the onset of this conditioned analgesia was reproduced by systemic administration of morphine. These findings suggest that both a minimal level of stimulus intensity and stress are necessary for the activation of endogenous opioid-mediated analgesia.