In order to ascertain why certain bryophyte species are com- mon while others are rare, and perhaps refugial, an autecological investigation on populations of Trichocolea tomentella (Ehrh.) Dum., Nowellia curvifolia (Dicks.) Mitt., Lophocolea heterophylla (Schrad.) Dum., Diphyscium foliosum (Hedw.) Mohr and Atrichum angustatum (Brid.) B.S.G. in three separate areas in southern Illinois is presented. Vapor pressure deficit, plant surface temper- ature and radiant energy in the blue, red and far red wavelengths, as well as substrate pH and exchangeable potassium and phosphorus ions were utilized to compare the microhabitats. Sample populations of Trichocolea and Nowel- lia, which are northern in distribution and rarely occur in southern Illinois, grow in definite microhabitats with narrow ranges of environmental condi- tions that are similar from one area to another. Sample populations of Lophocolea, Atrichum and Diphyscium, however, all possess wider ecological amplitudes. Of the environmental factors considered, moisture conditions seem to be the most significant in comparing the microhabitats of the different populations. It is obvious that climatic and edaphic factors such as temperature, light, humidity, water availability and substrate conditions all function together in regulating and re- stricting the occurrence of bryophytes. These factors closely interact, and often it is hard to ascertain which are the most important. In many instances as light increases, temperature increases and moisture decreases, ultimately affecting substrate pH and nutrient availability. It is also difficult to discern if various climatic factors are required or merely toler- ated. The plants may be able to tolerate low moisture and high temperatures in order to obtain adequate light intensities or, on the other hand, tolerate low light conditions to meet high humidity and low temperature requirements. Requirement versus tolerance may also pertain to certain substrate conditions such as pH, mineral content and/or water holding capacity. Perhaps it is the need for lower vapor pressure deficits or certain nutrients that may be associated with sandstone or rotting logs, not the low pH, which is possibly only being tolerated. Others have contributed information on one or more of the above mentioned fac- tors, but an ecological study concerning all of the factors has not been forthcoming.
Read full abstract