I. INTRODUCTIONA few years ago, British Telecom ran a newspaper advertisement in British press about benefits - and consequences - of advances in communications technology. Featuring a remote settlement in north-west Highlands of Scotland, and with clear implication that such out-of-the-way were now connected to wider world (as if they had not been before), advert proclaimed Geography is History. What advert signalled to as end of geography in sense of social gradients associated with space and distance is what is known, variously, as time-space convergence and time-space distanciation.1 The terms embrace not just collapse of geographical space given technical advances (in travel time and in communications - consequences of what Castells calls the information age and the network society2), but also idea that modern world has become more homogenized. One place is now much same as another. Further, given likelihood of such technical and cultural changes continuing into future, geographical distinctiveness, evident in particularity of place, would be a thing of past: geography would indeed be history. There is, of course, much evidence to contrary: that, in face of globalisation, questions of locality, sense of place and of identity in place matter now more than ever. Even, then, as Francis Fukuyama cautioned against death of liberal democratic politics as The End of History,3 geography - that is, geography understood as questions to do with place, and questions to do with where you are in world as part of questions about how you are and who you are in world - has had considerably heightened significance and for some places and people more than others.4These notions of place - as a particular location, and character or sense of place - are only part of meanings associated with place in geographical and in historical work. Like space, its regular epistemic dancing partner in geographical ubiquity and metaphysical imprecision, place is a widespread yet complex term. What follows is historiographie al in focus and, of necessity, partial in range. I offer a historiographical survey of term place, principally but not alone within recent work in geography. In more detail, and with reference to one of strong senses in which place is used, namely that of locale, the local, or localness, I trace here connections between place, space, and idea of local as evident in recent work in history and in geography, especially within history and geography of science. Particular attention is paid in this context to distinctive features of what we may think of as spatial turn in history of science by looking at idea of place and space in recent work in Enlightenment studies. My argument is three-fold. Notions of place and space, much debated by geographers, have been as central a concern for intellectual historians and historians of science as for philosophers and others, but they have been differently expressed. There is, I shall argue, value in looking at these different views in order to understand that whilst place is a commonplace term it is not agreed upon: working with imprecision has been both opportunity and restriction. In relation to work within history of science and in Enlightenment studies, consideration of so-called spatial turn, of place as social practice and of placing as a process in accounting for uneven movement of ideas over space and time may help provide some precision and strengthen connections between geography and history.II. PLACE (IN GEOGRAPHY): A PARTIAL HISTORIOGRAPHYPlace is one of most fundamental concepts in human geography. It is also one of most problematic.5 Place, or small-scale regional space, features as a subdivision within Classical tripartite division of cosmography (the earth in relation to other planetary bodies), geography (the earth as a whole) and chorography (parts of earth or regional geography). …