North Italy Transplant Program Research Articles

Donation after circulatory death and liver transplantation: a cohort study.

Donations after circulatory death (DCD) are still challenging in Italy because of prolonged ischemia time (tWIT) due to the law and logistical issues. This cohort study was primarily aimed at assessing the association between successful transplantation and DCD types in the North Italy Transplant program. Adjusted risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for type III versus type II DCD were estimated using a Poisson regression model with a robust error variance. All consecutive DCD between 2008 and 2020 were included. Among 142 DCD, 102 were eligible for liver donation, and 96 were proposed: 68/69 (99%) and 28/33 (85%) type III and II DCD, respectively. Sixty-nine livers were recovered, 51/68 (75%) from type III and 18/28 (64%) from type II DCD, respectively (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.87-1.60). After ex-vivo perfusion, 50/68 (74%) and 14/28 (50%) livers from type III and type II DCD were transplanted (RR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.01-2.19). The estimate decreased after further controlling for tWIT (RR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.55-2.24). Five patients (7.8%) experienced a PNF, 3/50 and 2/14 from type III and type II DCD, respectively. Type III DCD livers were more likely to be transplanted than type II. Warm ischemia time might explain this difference.

Solid Organ Transplantation in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Era: “The Great Bet” in the North Italy Transplant Program Area

IntroductionSolid organ transplantation is challenging for waitlist patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. AimThis study investigates COVID-19 incidence and mortality in patients transplanted in the North Italy Transplant program (NITp) during the outbreak. Materials and MethodsAll consecutive patients transplanted from February 20 to April 3, 2020 (6 weeks), were included in our cohort and were observed for at least 4 weeks. Survival analyses were performed. ResultsIn this study, 124 patients were transplanted with 12 (9.7%) hearts, 4 (3.2%) lungs, 39 (31.4%) livers, 67 (54%) kidneys, and 2 (1.6%) combined kidney-pancreas. Recipients’ mean age was 51 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 16.6), and 76 of 124 (61%) were men. Five (4%) patients developed COVID-19 after a mean of 13 days (SD ± 6.7), with a cumulative incidence of 4.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-7.5). During the follow-up period, 5 of 124 (4%) recipients died; overall mortality was 4.3% (95% CI, 0.6-8.0), with only 1 patient dying of COVID-19, for a COVID-19–related mortality of 0.8% (95% CI, 0-6.0). ConclusionsThis study showed a low COVID-19 incidence and COVID-19–related mortality in patients transplanted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further studies with a longer follow-up period are mandatory to confirm the safety of transplant procedures.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Solid Organ Donation: The North Italy Transplant Program Experience

BackgroundThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak has unfavorably influenced solid organ donation activity. AimThe aim of this study is to investigate the effect of COVID-19 on transplantation in the North Italy Transplant program (NITp). Material and MethodsThis cross-sectional study included all consecutive potential deceased donors proposed in the NITp in 6 weeks after February 21, 2020 (period A) compared to all potential donors during the same time frame of the previous years (period B) and all potential donors 6 weeks before February 20, 2020 (period C). ResultsFifty-eight deceased donors were proposed during period A, 95 were proposed during period B, and 128 were proposed during period C. After the evaluation process, 32 of 58 (55.2%), 60 of 95 (63.2%), and 79 of 128 (61.7%) donors were used for organ donation in periods A, B, and C, respectively (P value = .595). We observed a 47% donation reduction in period A compared to period B and a 60% reduction compared to period C. There was a reduction of 44% and 59% in transplantation comparing period A with period B and period C, respectively. ConclusionsThis study showed an important reduction of donations and transplants during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on liver transplantation programs in Northern Italy.

In January 2020, Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‐19) resulted in a global pandemic, creating uncertainty toward the management of liver transplantation (LT) programs. Lombardy has been the most affected region in Italy: the current mortality rate of COVID‐19 patients is 18.3% (10 022 deaths; April 10th) with hospitals in Lombardy having to expand the total number of ICU beds from 724 to 1381 to accommodate infected patients. There has been a drastic decrease in liver donors. From February 23rd until April 10th, 17 LTs were performed in Lombardy. Mean donor age was 49 years (range 18‐74) whereas mean recipient age was 55 (13‐69); mean MELD score was 12 (6‐24). All donors underwent screening for SARS‐CoV‐2 prior to LT. Two patients tested positive after LT, and one patient died for COVID on POD 30. Sixteen patients are alive after an average of 30 days post‐LT (range 3‐46). 10 patients have been discharged. This study has found no specific reason concerning the safety of recipients, to stop LT programs. Several key lessons from our experience are reported. However, due to the complex circumstances which surround the viral outbreak, the cessation or a reduction in LT activity is a pragmatic requirement.

Quality of Life Before and After Transplantation in Solid Organ Recipients Referred to the North Italy Transplant program (NITp): A Cross-sectional Study

IntroductionThe interest in health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) has increased in the past few years. AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the HR-QoL before and after transplantation in solid organ recipients referred to the North Italy Transplant program. Material and MethodsThis cross-sectional study was performed between 2010 and 2011. All consecutive recipients on the waiting list for liver, heart, or kidney transplantation were included and compared to all consecutive transplanted patients at 6 and 24 months of follow-up after transplantation. The HR-QoL was evaluated with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF–36) and the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Questionnaires were self-reported anonymously. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed. ResultsFour hundred eleven patients were interviewed: 146 patients (35.5%) were on the waiting list, 137 (33.3%) were transplanted 6 months before the interview, and 128 (31.1%) were transplanted 24 months before the interview. Patients on the waiting list had a lower SF–36 score for all items than did transplanted patients after both 6 and 24 months. According to POMS results, patients on the waiting list had a higher prevalence of depression, tension, anger, fatigue, and confusion than did transplanted patients. ConclusionsPatients on the waiting list showed a worse quality of life compared to patients after transplantation as demonstrated by SF–36 and POMS results. These findings should be confirmed in a cohort study.

Cost-effectiveness of pretransplant sofosbuvir for preventing recurrent hepatitis C virus infection after liver transplantation.

There are reports of pretransplant sofosbuvir (SOF) plus ribavirin being effective in preventing recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of this strategy in the area served by the North Italy Transplant program. We retrospectively assessed the impact of HCV infection on post-LT survival in 2376 consecutive adult patients (MELD ≤ 25, unknown genotype, period 2004-2009) and the prevalence costs of conventional standard of care (SOC) antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) after LT. A Markov model was developed to compare two strategies: 12-24 weeks of SOF+ ribavirin for pre-LT anti-HCV treatment versus on-demand post-LT SOC antiviral therapy. Among the 1794 patients undergoing LT, 860 (48%) were HCV+ and 50% of them were given SOC therapy after LT (mean cost of drugs and adverse effect management = 14,421€ per patient). HCV etiology had a strong impact on post-LT survival (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.22-2.09, P = 0.0007). After Monte Carlo simulation, pre-LT SOF therapy showed a median survival benefit of 1.5 quality-adjusted life years and an Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 30,663€/QALY, proving cost-effective in our particular Italian scenario. The costs of SOF therapy, sustained viral response rate 12 weeks after LT, and recipient's age were the main ICER predictors at multivariate analysis. This study proposes a dynamic model based on real-life data from northern Italy for adjusting the costs of pre-LT direct-acting antiviral therapies to the actual sustained virological response reached after LT.

The allocation of pancreas allografts on donor age and duration of intensive care unit stay: the experience of the North Italy Transplant program

Starting in 2011, the North Italy Transplant program (NITp) has based on the allocation of pancreas allografts on donor age and duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, but not on donor weight or BMI. We analyzed the detailed allocation protocols of all NITp pancreas donors (2011-2012; n = 433). Outcome measures included donor characteristics and pancreas loss reasons during the allocation process. Twenty-three percent of the 433 pancreases offered for allocation were transplanted. Younger age, shorter ICU stay, traumatic brain death, and higher eGFR were predictors of pancreas transplant, either as vascularized organ or as islets. Among pancreas allografts offered to vascularized organ programs, 35% were indeed transplanted, and younger donor age was the only predictor of transplant. The most common reasons for pancreas withdrawal from the allocation process were donor-related factors. Among pancreas offered to islet programs, 48% were processed, but only 14.2% were indeed transplanted, with unsuccessful isolation being the most common reason for pancreas loss. Younger donor age and higher BMI were predictors of islet allograft transplant. The current allocation strategy has allowed an equal distribution of pancreas allografts between programs for either vascularized organ or islet transplant. The high rate of discarded organs remained an unresolved issue.

A method for establishing allocation equity among patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma on a common liver transplant waiting list

The current organ allocation system for liver transplantation (LT) creates an imbalance between patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We describe a model designed to re-establish allocation equity among patient groups using transplant benefit as the common endpoint. We enrolled consecutive adult patients entering the waiting list (WL group, n=2697) and undergoing LT (LT group, n=1702) during the period 2004-2009 in the North Italy Transplant program area. Independent multivariable regressions (WL and LT models) were created for patients without HCC and for those with stage T2 HCC. Monte Carlo simulation was used to create distributions of transplant benefit, and covariates such as Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were combined in regression equations. These equations were then calibrated to create an "MELD equivalent" which matches HCC patients to non-HCC patients having the same numerical MELD score. Median 5 year transplant benefit was 15.12 months (8.75-25.35) for the non-HCC patients, and 28.18 months (15.11-36.38) for the T2-HCC patients (p<0.001). Independent predictors of transplant benefit were MELD score (estimate=0.89, p<0.001) among non-HCC patients, and MELD (estimate=1.14, p<0.001) and logAFP (estimate=-0.46, p<0.001) among HCC patients. The equation "HCC-MELD"=1.27∗MELD - 0.51∗logAFP+4.59 calculates a numerical score for HCC patients, whereby their transplant benefit is equal to that of non-HCC patients with the same numerical value for MELD. We describe a method for calibrating HCC and non-HCC patients according to survival benefit, and propose that this method has the potential, if externally validated, to restore equity to the organ allocation system.

Clinical relevance of human leukocyte antigen antibodies in kidney transplantation from deceased donors: The North Italy Transplant program approach

At the North Italy Transplant Program (NITp) Reference Center, which is responsible for pre- and posttransplant immunological evaluation and organ allocation, the sera of patients who enter the kidney waiting list are analyzed with complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and a microbead array technique (Luminex). At present, the NITp waiting list includes 2543 patients. The rate of patients with a percentage panel-reactive antibody (PRA) ≥30 with CDC is about 8%; among them, 1% exhibits a %PRA ≥85. Furthermore, 14% of patients have antibodies detectable only with Luminex. The overall 5-year graft survival in the period 1997–2008 is 85%, whereas that of individuals with a CDC %PRA ≥30 is 80.1% ( p = 0.0355). A retrospective analysis on the effect of Luminex-detected anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies has suggested that there is a posttransplant immunological response in Luminex-positive patients that can slowly produce kidney damage. Here we present the NITp current policy for the screening and identification of anti-HLA antibodies in relation to kidney allocation algorithm and the authors' view on some aspects of discussion.

Role of the Pathologist in Organ Transplantation: The North Italy Transplant Program Experience

The North Italy Transplant program (NITp) is one of the three organ exchange organizations in Italy together with AIRT and OCST, supervised by the Centro Nazionale Trapianti. It started its activity on June 18, 1972 and serves an area of about 18 million inhabitants in northern Italy. From June 18, 1972 to December 31, 2004, 5761 cadaveric donors have been used and 18,390 transplants performed in the NITp. At December 31, 2004, the NITp waiting list included 3407 patients (2261 kidney, 425 heart, 387 liver, 153 pancreas, 181 lung). From January 1 to August 31, 2005, 13 donors with cancer were used, namely, 4.2% of the overall number of procured donors. The yearly projection of this figure is more than twofold above that in the previous year. Pathologists play a crucial role in NITp activity, by assessing donor suitability and organ quality, by performing the autopsy control of donors, and by participating in transplant follow-up. In addition the pathologist responsible for the Veneto-centralized pathology unit plays the role of expert for second opinion for the NITp area. Pathologists are involved in expanding the pool of donors by analyzing organ biopsies in specific programs. Eight HBV + and/or HCV + liver biopsies have been evaluated during 2003 and 18 during 2004 and 12 livers, according to the protocol, were suitable for transplantation, and 14 double kidney transplantations were performed in 2003 and 35 in 2004.

Kidney Transplantation from Anti-HBc+ Donors: Results from a Retrospective Italian Study

The risk of transmitting a hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection from donor kidneys with a past HBV serological profile may be negligible. Data on HBV transmission to kidney transplant recipients from donor organs that were anti-HBc/HBsAg in Italy has not been previously reported. Anti-HBc testing in cadaver organ donors has been mandatory in Italy since 2002, when anti-HBc determinations were included in the National Guidelines for donor evaluation. Therefore, prior to that date kidney recipients from anti-HBc/HBsAg donors can be identified retrospectively where stored serum is available for testing. The prevalence of anti-HBc Italian organ donors, the incidence of HBV transmission according to the recipients' HBV status (vaccinated, recovered, or naive), and the clinical impact (5-year graft and patient survival rates) in the North Italy Transplant program was evaluated by retrospectively screening for anti-HBc antibodies in the sera of cadaver kidney donors used in transplants from 1997 to 1999. Two hundred and ten donors were found to have been anti-HBc. At the time of the study, no active infection was observed in any of the 344 HBsAg recipients, but 4/140 (2.86%) of the vaccinated recipients were found to have been anti-HBc/HBsAg. None of these patients, however, had any biochemical or clinical history of HBV infection. Patient and graft survival rates of anti-HBc or anti-HBc kidney recipients did not differ statistically. Kidney grafts from anti-HBc donors should be considered in all recipients because the benefit obtained from the transplantation out weighs the negligible risk of HBV transmission.

Incidence of cancer after kidney transplant: results from the North Italy transplant program.

Patients undergoing kidney transplantation demonstrate a higher risk of developing cancer as the result of immunosuppressive treatment and concurrent infections. The incidence of cancer in a cohort of patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1990 and 2000, and who survived the acute phase (10 days), was analyzed as part of the North Italy Transplant program. A total of 3,521 patients underwent transplantation during a 10-year period in 10 of 13 participating centers; the length of follow-up after kidney transplant was 67.7+/-36.0 months. During the follow-up, 172 patients developed cancer (39 with Kaposi sarcoma, 38 with lymphoproliferative diseases, and 95 with carcinomas [17 kidney, 11 non-basal cell carcinoma of the skin, 10 colorectal, 8 breast, 7 gastric, 7 lung, 6 bladder, and 3 mesothelioma]). The average time to cancer development after transplant was 40.1+/-33.4 months (range 0-134 months). Twenty-four patients developed cancer within 6 months from the transplant (10 with carcinomas, 7 with Kaposi sarcoma, and 7 with lymphoproliferative diseases). Three patients demonstrated a second primary cancer. The average cancer incidence was 4.9%. The incidence of cancer was 0.01 per year. Independent determinants of cancer development were age, gender, and immunosuppressive protocol including induction. Ten-year mortality was significantly higher in patients with cancer (33.1%) than among patients without cancer (5.3%). The relative risk of death in subjects with cancer was 5.5 (confidence interval 4.1-7.4). These preliminary data underline the importance of long-term surveillance of transplant recipients, choice of immunosuppressive treatment, and careful donor selection.

Tumor incidence in heart transplant patients: report of the North Italy Transplant Program Registry

Tumor incidence in heart transplant patients: report of the North Italy Transplant Program Registry

Split liver is an effective tool to transplant paediatric patients

Abstract Transplantation activity is dependent upon organ procurement; although great efforts are made to enlarge the cadaver donors' pool, it still remains far too small to meet the recipients' need. Waiting time is a particular problem for paediatric patients, and mortality on the waiting list for liver transplantation is very high. The number of paediatric donors is far too small to satisfy the request. To enlarge the liver pool, the split-liver procedure was introduced in several Transplant Centers. In November 1997, the North Italy Transplant program (NITp) Working Group for Liver Transplantation decided to start an official Split-liver Program. A protocol was therefore defined and criteria for donor's and recipient's eligibility were established to minimize the risk. The Working Group also standardized the technical procedure and defined collaboration between centers. Out of 410 cadaver liver donors used in the NITp, from 1 November 1997 until 31 May 1999, 49 patients (37 males and 12 females) were chosen for the split-liver procedure. Mean age was 29.9 ± 17.5 years. Mean ICU stay of the donors was considerably short (2.5 ± 2.1 days), and the other conditions foreseen for donor eligibility were met. In all cases (except two) an “in situ” technique was performed. Forty-nine adult recipients and 43 children were transplanted by the split-liver technique in our Transplant Centers. One right lobe and five left liver lobes were sent to Transplant Centers outside the NITp. Adult recipient age ranged from 18 to 60 years (mean 46.4 ±11.7 years), and the paediatric one from 2 to 144 months (mean 24.8). Mean patient follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.5 months. In the paediatric group, the graft was successful in 34 cases (79 %), five patients (10.2 %) died and four (9.3 %) were re-transplanted. In the adult group, graft survival was 67.3 %, 11 (22 %) patients died and 5 (10 %) were re-transplanted. On 1 November 1997, 30 paediatric patients were on the liver waiting list. In the preceding 19 months, 52 patients were newly enrolled, and 36 transplants were performed. The mean waiting time of paediatric patients was 259 days (range 1-919 says). From 1 November 1997 to 31 May 1999, 61 paediatric patients were newly enrolled. In this period 70 patients were transplanted. The mean waiting time was 185 days (1-1010 days). At present, the liver waiting list includes eight paediatric patients. Split-liver transplantation is a successful procedure, effective in reducing waiting time for paediatric patients. It should be established if this may be a tool to enlarge the organ pool also for adult liver transplantation.

An algorithm for cadaver kidney allocation based on a multivariate analysis of factors impacting on cadaver kidney graft survival and function

Abstract The large imbalance between cadaver kidney supply and demand makes the implementation of equitable and effective organ allocation systems an urgent need. This has triggered a revision of the criteria used so far for cadaver kidney allocation within the North Italy Transplant program, not least in the light of the many changes that have occurred recently with respect to broader criteria for admission of patients to the waiting list, donor selection, tissue-typing methods, organ preservation and immunosuppressive protocols. We based the critical revision of our cadaver kidney allocation algorithm on univariate and multivariate analysis of a number of immunological, clinical, social and administrative factors that impacted on the transplant outcome in 2,917 patients transplanted in the 12 transplant centers operating within our organization from 1 January 1990 to 30 September 1997. This analysis indicated that younger donor age, absence of pretransplant transfusions, patient dialysis center and level of HLA match showed statistically significant positive associations with graft survival. Younger donor age and male donor gender showed a statistically significant association with excellent graft function at 4 years. The results of this analysis were used to develop a new computer-assisted version of our adult kidney allocation algorithm. It works in two steps (local pool first, then the entire waiting list) and four levels (0-1 HLA MM, PRA +; 2 HLA MM, PRA +; 0-1 MM, PRA-; 2-4 HLA MM, PRA-); within each level, selection takes into account waiting time and age difference from donor age. The evaluation of 731 transplants allocated in 19 months with the new algorithm, as against 698 transplants allocated in the preceding 19 months according to the previous algorithm, showed a significantly higher proportion of recipients who had been on the waiting list for more than 3 years (33.2% versus 22.6%). The use of the new algorithm was also associated with a significantly increased number of transplanted alloimmunized patients (18.8% versus 9.2% with the previous algorithm) and recipients with 0-1 HLA mismatches (22% versus 14.3%). Furthermore, the number of kidneys used locally has steadily increased. Differences in 6-month graft survival and percentage of patients with excellent function at 6 months were not statistically significant in recipients transplanted with the new versus the previous algorithm. Survivals were 93.7% versus 91.8%. Percentages of patients with excellent renal function were 69.9% and 71.8%, respectively. These preliminary data suggest that the new algorithm improves HLA match and reduces the number of patients on the waiting list for 3 or more years without determining significant modifications of 6-month graft survival and function. Moreover, it facilitates the achievement of a fair local balance between organs retrieved and transplanted, the compliance of operators with objective allocation rules and the documentation of the whole allocation process.

Split liver is an effective tool to transplant paediatric patients.

Transplantation activity is dependent upon organ procurement; although great efforts are made to enlarge the cadaver donors' pool, it still remains far too small to meet the recipients' need. Waiting time is a particular problem for paediatric patients, and mortality on the waiting list for liver transplantation is very high. The number of paediatric donors is far too small to satisfy the request. To enlarge the liver pool, the split-liver procedure was introduced in several Transplant Centers. In November 1997, the North Italy Transplant program (NITp) Working Group for Liver Transplantation decided to start an official Split-liver Program. A protocol was therefore defined and criteria for donor's and recipient's eligibility were established to minimize the risk. The Working Group also standardized the technical procedure and defined collaboration between centers. Out of 410 cadaver liver donors used in the NITp, from 1 November 1997 until 31 May 1999, 49 patients (37 males and 12 females) were chosen for the split-liver procedure. Mean age was 29.9 +/- 17.5 years. Mean ICU stay of the donors was considerably short (2.5 +/- 2.1 days), and the other conditions foreseen for donor eligibility were met. In all cases (except two) an "in situ" technique was performed. Forty-nine adult recipients and 43 children were transplanted by the split-liver technique in our Transplant Centers. One right lobe and five left liver lobes were sent to Transplant Centers outside the NITp. Adult recipient age ranged from 18 to 60 years (mean 46.4 +/- 11.7 years), and the paediatric one from 2 to 144 months (mean 24.8). Mean patient follow-up was 8.3 +/- 5.5 months. In the paediatric group, the graft was successful in 34 cases (79%), five patients (10.2%) died and four (9.3%) were re-transplanted. In the adult group, graft survival was 67.3%, 11 (22%) patients died and 5 (10%) were re-transplanted. On 1 November 1997, 30 paediatric patients were on the liver waiting list. In the preceding 19 months, 52 patients were newly enrolled, and 36 transplants were performed. The mean waiting time of paediatric patients was 259 days (range 1-919 says). From 1 November 1997 to 31 May 1999, 61 paediatric patients were newly enrolled. In this period 70 patients were transplanted. The mean waiting time was 185 days (1-1010 days). At present, the liver waiting list includes eight paediatric patients. Split-liver transplantation is a successful procedure, effective in reducing waiting time for paediatric patients. It should be established if this may be a tool to enlarge the organ pool also for adult liver transplantation.

An algorithm for cadaver kidney allocation based on a multivariate analysis of factors impacting on cadaver kidney graft survival and function.

The large imbalance between cadaver kidney supply and demand makes the implementation of equitable and effective organ allocation systems an urgent need. This has triggered a revision of the criteria used so far for cadaver kidney allocation within the North Italy Transplant program, not least in the light of the many changes that have occurred recently with respect to broader criteria for admission of patients to the waiting list, donor selection, tissue-typing methods, organ preservation and immunosuppressive protocols. We based the critical revision of our cadaver kidney allocation algorithm on univariate and multivariate analysis of a number of immunological, clinical, social and administrative factors that impacted on the transplant outcome in 2,917 patients transplanted in the 12 transplant centers operating within our organization from 1 January 1990 to 30 September 1997. This analysis indicated that younger donor age, absence of pretransplant transfusions, patient dialysis center and level of HLA match showed statistically significant positive associations with graft survival. Younger donor age and male donor gender showed a statistically significant association with excellent graft function at 4 years. The results of this analysis were used to develop a new computer-assisted version of our adult kidney allocation algorithm. It works in two steps (local pool first, then the entire waiting list) and four levels (0-1 HLA MM, PRA+; 2 HLA MM, PRA+; 0-1 MM, PRA-; 2-4 HLA MM, PRA-); within each level, selection takes into account waiting time and age difference from donor age. The evaluation of 731 transplants allocated in 19 months with the new algorithm, as against 698 transplants allocated in the preceding 19 months according to the previous algorithm, showed a significantly higher proportion of recipients who had been on the waiting list for more than 3 years (33.2% versus 22.6%). The use of the new algorithm was also associated with a significantly increased number of transplanted alloimmunized patients (18.8% versus 9.2% with the previous algorithm) and recipients with 0-1 HLA mismatches (22% versus 14.3%). Furthermore, the number of kidneys used locally has steadily increased. Differences in 6-month graft survival and percentage of patients with excellent function at 6 months were not statistically significant in recipients transplanted with the new versus the previous algorithm. Survivals were 93.7% versus 91.8%. Percentages of patients with excellent renal function were 69.9% and 71.8%, respectively. These preliminary data suggest that the new algorithm improves HLA match and reduces the number of patients on the waiting list for 3 or more years without determining significant modifications of 6-month graft survival and function. Moreover, it facilitates the achievement of a fair local balance between organs retrieved and transplanted, the compliance of operators with objective allocation rules and the documentation of the whole allocation process.

Prediction and treatment of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after renal transplantation in children.

The recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) after renal transplantation has a potentially detrimental course toward the loss of renal function. To identify prognostic markers for recurrence and efficacy of treatment, we evaluated the outcome of 32 renal allografts in 29 pediatric patients with FSGS who underwent transplantation from 1987 to 1998 in the North Italy Transplant program. Recurrence was observed in 15 of 29 patients (52%) after the first transplant and in 3 of 3 patients (100%) after the second graft. No significant differences in sex, age at FSGS onset, age at transplantation, or length of dialysis were noted between patients with recurrent and nonrecurrent FSGS. Those with recurrence originally developed end-stage renal failure faster (3.9 years) than those without recurrence (6.2 years). Pretransplantation serum samples from 25 patients were tested in an in vitro assay that evaluates glomerular permeability to albumin. FSGS recurred in 11 of 13 children who tested positive for the permeability factor and in 4 of 12 patients with a negative test result; the odds ratio for developing recurrence was 10.99 (95% confidence limit, 1.6 to 75.47) in the former group. The immediate onset of proteinuria after transplantation was a negative prognostic factor for the outcome; 6 of 9 patients in whom proteinuria appeared within 2 days of transplantation returned to dialysis in less than 24 months. In 9 of 11 patients who were treated with plasmapheresis plus cyclophosphamide after recurrence, proteinuria was successfully reversed and persistent remission was obtained in 7 patients. These data show that the glomerular permeability test has a significant predictive value for the recurrence of proteinuria in children with FSGS who have received a renal allograft. Of the clinical parameters considered, only the duration of disease was significantly different in patients with recurrent versus nonrecurrent FSGS. Treatment with plasmapheresis plus cyclophosphamide can be effective in the control of FSGS relapse after renal transplantation.

Multicenter study on hepatitis C virus infection in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

Preliminary epidemiological and histological studies from Japan suggested that hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has a role in the development of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). This multicenter study was conducted to verify this hypothesis on a large cohort of Italian patients with end-stage heart failure. Antibodies to HCV were determined in the 752 consecutive patients (608 males and 144 females; age, 53 +/- 13 years) who entered the waiting list for cardiac transplantation from 1995 to 1997 at the six cardiac surgery centers participating in the North Italy Transplant program. Three hundred and nine patients (41%) had dilated, 9 (1%) restrictive, and 4 (0.5%) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; 284 patients (38%) had ischemic, 65 (9%) valvular, and 22 (3%) congenital heart disease; 5 patients (0.5%) had primary pulmonary hypertension; 54 patients (7%) had other or nonspecified heart disease. Overall, 41 of 752 patients (5.4%) resulted anti-HCV-reactive. Serological evidence of HCV infection was found in 12 of 309 patients with DCM (3.9%; 95% CI, 1.7-6.0), and in 29 of 443 without DCM (6.5%; 95% CI, 4.2-8.8), without statistical difference (difference of prevalence rate: 2.6%; 95% CI, -4.9 to 5.8). In conclusion, HCV does not seem to have a primary role in the pathogenesis of DCM. However, since our findings are in disagreement with those obtained in smaller series of patients of other ethnicity, large studies from different countries should be conducted.

Donor organ procurement in the North Italy Transplant program (NITp) in 1994: the beginning of a promising trend?

Abstract Donor organ procurement is a world-wide problem. In Italy it is particularly so and the reasons for this are investigated. An overall increase in the number of donors has been noted in 1994 and the first 8 months of 1995, and ways of continuing this encouraging trend should be pursued by improvements in education, legislation, and hospital organization.