Given that obesity results from food in take greater than energy needs, a fascinating question has been whether obese individuals have a larger stomach capacity. Previous studies using an intragastric balloon to assess stomach capacity showed that it was larger in both moderately and severely obese individuals (1) (2). These conclusions were made from subjective criteria based on the maximal volume that the subject tolerated as well as from more objective criteria based on intragastric pressure or compliance. New findings in this issue by Kim et al. (3), from imaging with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), reveal a larger antral volume in obese individuals in the fasting state as also found by Chiloiro et al. (4) in obese children. Observing the stomach with SPECT provides a way to estimate the size of the stomach in vivo. It is especially useful for observation of the antrum, the more muscular less distensible lower part of the stomach, primarily involved in churning and propulsion. A large antrum is probably needed as a conduit for a large capacity upper stomach (fundus and body). Thus, these observations of an enlarged antrum in obesity are consistent with the previous measurements showing large gastric capacity based on distension of the upper or proximal stomach. The proximal stomach, which acts primarily as a reservoir, can readily distend to accommodate food ingestion. However, imaging the size of the fasting proximal stomach probably does not tell us much about its distensible capacity. After ingestion of a small liquid meal, Kim et al. (3) found no additional differences with imaging between lean and obese subjects. However, imaging of the stomach after a 300-mL meal is not really a measure of gastric capacity, inasmuch as the stomach fills to reflect the amount ingested. The increase in the proximal stomach volume from fasting to postprandial for both the obese and non-obese groups was ∼300 mL, the volume of the meal. The smaller increase in the antral volume for both groups (∼180 mL) may reflect the overflow from gastric juice. Continued gastric secretions could explain why the gastric volume did not change much between the first and second 10 minutes after the meal, despite some gastric emptying. Figure 1 of the article by Kim et al. (3) clearly shows that ingesting even a small meal mainly distends the upper part of the stomach. To assess gastric accommodation to a meal, it might have been more informative to measure changes in gastric pressure rather than in volume. For the next part of the study, the investigators had the participants drink the same liquid meal until unbearably full. They found no differences in meal intake between the weight groups. However, as the authors note, the maximal volume ingested is an inaccurate proxy for capacity, because it does not take into account the inflow from saliva and gastric juice or the outflow due to gastric emptying. Thus, the results from previous balloon measurements showing greater gastric capacity in the obese are not contradicted. Other studies suggest that obesity may not be the key to a large gastric capacity. Indeed, gastric capacity in normal-weight bulimic patients is even larger than in obese patients (5) (6) (7). Among obese patients, those who binge eat have a larger gastric capacity than those who do not (6) (7). In both obese binge eaters and normal-weight bulimic patients, gastric capacity is correlated with test meal intake (5) (7). It would have been interesting to subdivide the subjects in the study by Kim et al. (3) into those who binge eat and those who do not. As the degree of obesity increases, the likelihood of binge eating also increases (8) and may help explain why the gastric capacity in morbidly obese individuals is so large (1). Of course, gastric restriction operations for the severely obese drastically reduce capacity and lead to substantial weight loss (9). Dieting also leads to reduced gastric capacity (10), but this has not been as effective in the long-term as surgery. Even after surgery, the pouch can enlarge over time and may be related to some weight regain (9). Inserting a chronic intragastric balloon to treat obesity also has shown only modest and transient effects (11) (12) (13) because gastric capacity seems to enlarge to compensate for the displaced volume (12). Nevertheless, there may be potential pharmacological approaches to reduce gastric compliance and capacity that could be studied by combining several techniques, including intragastric pressure/volume measurements and SPECT.