Norbuprenorphine Glucuronide Research Articles

Investigation of buprenorphine-related deaths using urinary metabolite concentrations.

Quantitative analysis of postmortem urine, instead of blood, for buprenorphine and metabolites may provide additional evidence for the diagnosis of fatal buprenorphine poisoning. In this study, 247 autopsy urine samples, previously testing positive for buprenorphine or norbuprenorphine, were quantitatively reanalysed with a recently developed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for unconjugated buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), naloxone (NAL), and their respective conjugated metabolites, buprenorphine glucuronide (BUPG), norbuprenorphine glucuronide (NBUPG), and naloxone glucuronide (NALG). The cases were divided, according to medical examiners' decision, to buprenorphine poisonings and other causes of death. The groups were compared for urinary concentrations and metabolite concentration ratios of the six analytes. All median concentrations were higher in the buprenorphine poisoning group. The median concentration of BUPG was significantly higher and the median metabolite ratios NBUP/BUP, NBUPG/BUPG, and NBUPtotal/BUPtotal were significantly lower in poisonings than in other causes of death. Naloxone-related concentrations and ratios were not significantly different between the groups.

Pharmacokinetic Characterization and External Evaluation of a Quantitative Framework of Sublingual Buprenorphine in Patients with an Opioid Disorder in Puerto Rico.

Background: The aim of this analysis was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sublingual buprenorphine (BUP) and its metabolites (buprenorphine glucuronide; BUP-g, norbuprenorphine; Nor-BUP, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide; Nor-BUP-g) in opioid use disorder (OUD) patients in Puerto Rico (PR) as a first step of evidence-based BUP dosing strategies in this population. Methods: BUP and metabolites concentrations were measured from 0 to 8 h after the administration of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone films in 12 stable OUD subjects. Results: PK non-compartmental characteristics showed considerable variability in parameters between the subjects over the 8-h sampling time (tmax = 1.5 ± 0.7 h, Co = 1.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL, Cmax= 7.1 ± 6 ng/mL, and AUC0–8h = 26.8 ± 17.8 h·ng/mL). Subjects had a significantly higher tendency towards CYP-mediated N-demethylation, with the AUC0–8h ratios of the molar concentrations of [Nor-BUP + Nor-BUP-g] to BUP being (3.4 ± 1.9) significantly higher compared with BUP-g to BUP (0.19 ± 0.2). A two-compartment population-PK model with linear absorption (ka = 2.54 h−1), distribution (k12= 2.34 h−1, k14 = 1.29 h−1), metabolism (k24 = 1.28 × 10−1 h−1, k23 = 6.43 × 10−2 h−1, k35 = 1.23 × 10−1 h−1, k45 = 8.73 × 10−1 h−1), and elimination (k30 = 3.81 × 10−3 h−1, k50 = 1.27 × 10−1 h−1) adequately described the time-course of BUP and its metabolites, which has been externally validated using published data. Conclusions: Although limited in sampling time and number of recruited subjects, this study presents specific BUP PK characteristics that evidenced the need for additional PK studies and subsequent modeling of the data for the development of evidence-based dosing approaches in Puerto Rico.

Pregnancy Alters CYP- and UGT-Mediated Metabolism of Buprenorphine.

In the United States, drug addiction has become a nationwide health crisis. Recently, buprenorphine (BUP), a maintenance therapy approved by the Food and Drug Administration, has been increasingly used in pregnant women for the treatment of opioid use disorder. Pregnancy is associated with various anatomic and physiological changes, which may result in altered drug pharmacokinetics (PKs). Previously, we reported that dose-adjusted plasma concentrations of BUP are lower during pregnancy than after pregnancy. The mechanism(s) responsible for this difference has not yet been defined. Our study aimed to evaluate alterations in cytochromes P450 (CYP)- and uridine diphosphate glucunosyltransferases (UGT)-mediated metabolism of BUP during pregnancy to determine the mechanism(s) responsible for this observation. Data from 2 clinical studies were included in the current analysis. Study 1 was a prospective, open-labeled, nonrandomized longitudinal BUP PK study in pregnant women with a singleton gestation, stabilized on twice-daily sublingual BUP opioid substitution therapy. Each subject participated in up to 3 studies during and after pregnancy (the second, third trimester, and postpartum). The design of study 2 was similar to study 1, with patients evaluated at different time points during the pregnancy (first, second-half of pregnancy), as well as during the postpartum period. In addition, the dosing frequency of BUP study 2 participants was not restricted to twice-daily dosing. At each study visit, blood samples were collected before a BUP dose, followed by multiple collection times (10-12) after the dose, for up to 12 hours or till the end of the dosing interval. Plasma concentrations of BUP and 3 metabolites were quantified using validated ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometric assays. In total, 19, 18, and 14 subjects completed the PK study during 1/2 trimester, third trimester, and postpartum, respectively. The AUC ratios of norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine glucuronide to buprenorphine, a measure of CYP3A mediated N-demethylation, were 1.89, 1.84, and 1.33 during the first and second, third trimesters, and postpartum, respectively. The AUC ratios of buprenorphine glucuronide to BUP, indicative of UGT activity, were 0.71, 2.07, and 0.3 at first/second trimesters, third trimester, and postpartum, respectively. Linear mixed-effect modeling analysis indicated that the AUC ratios of CYP- and UGT-mediated metabolism of BUP were significantly higher during pregnancy compared with postpartum. The CYP and UGT activities were significantly increased as determined by the metabolic ratios of BUP during pregnancy compared with the postpartum period. The increased UGT activity appeared to account for a substantial part of the observed change in metabolic activity during pregnancy. This is in agreement with the need for BUP dose increment in pregnant women to reach similar BUP exposure and therapeutic effect as in nonpregnant subjects.

Determination of buprenorphine, naloxone and phase I and phase II metabolites in rat whole blood by LC–MS/MS

Buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone combination are maintenance treatments used worldwide. However, since their marketing, despite ceiling respiratory effects, poisonings and fatalities have been attributed to buprenorphine misuse and overdose. Therefore, to better understand the mechanisms of buprenorphine-related toxicity in vivo, experimental investigations have been conducted, mainly in the rat. We developed a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric (LC–MS/MS) method with electrospray ionization for the simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, naloxone and their metabolites (norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, norbuprenorphine glucuronide and naloxone glucuronide) in rat whole blood. Compounds were extracted from whole blood by protein precipitation and chromatographically separated using gradient elution of aqueous ammonium formate and methanol in a Raptor Biphenyl core-shell column (100 mm x 3,0 mm x 2,7 μm). Following electrospray ionization, quantification was carried out in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode by the tandem mass spectrometer API 3200 system. The LC-MS/MS method was validated according to the currently accepted criteria for bioanalytical method validation. The method required small sample volumes (50 μL) and was sensitive with limits of quantification of 6.9, 6.2, 3.6, 3.3, 1.3 and 57.7 ng/mL for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, norbuprenorphine glucuronide, naloxone and naloxone glucuronide respectively. The upper limit of quantification was 4000 ng/ml for all the studied compounds. Trueness (88–115 %), repeatability and intermediate precision (both <15%) were in accordance with the international recommendations. The procedure was successfully used to quantify these compounds in the whole blood sample from one rat 24 h after the intravenous administration of buprenorphine/naloxone (30.0/7.5 mg/kg).

Quantitative determination of buprenorphine, naloxone and their metabolites in rat plasma using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry

A rapid and sensitive LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine and its three metabolites (buprenorphine glucuronide, norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine glucuronide) as well as naloxone and its metabolite naloxone glucuronide in the rat plasma. A hydrophilic interaction chromatography column and a mobile phase containing acetonitrile and ammonium formate buffer (pH 3.5) were used for the chromatographic separation. Mass spectrometric detection was achieved by an electrospray ionization source in the positive mode coupled to a triple quadrupole mass analyzer. The calibration curves for the six analytes displayed good linearity over the concentration range 1.0 or 5.0-1000 ng/mL. The intra and inter-day precision (CV) ranged from 2.68 to 16.4% and from 9.02 to 14.5%, respectively. The intra- and inter-day accuracy (bias) ranged from -14.2 to 15.2% and from -9.00 to 4.80%, respectively. The extraction recoveries for all the analytes ranged from 55 to 86.9%. The LC-MS/MS method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study of buprenorphine-naloxone combination in rats.

(115) Interpretation of urine drug testing results in patients using transdermal buprenorphine preparations for the treatment of chronic non-cancer pain

The use of buprenorphine for the management of chronic pain has risen rapidly since the FDA approved a transdermal formulation of this opioid in 2010. Consensus guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy highlight the importance of routine monitoring for patience compliance using periodic urine drug screens. The validity of the urine buprenorphine detection assay, currently in widespread use, was established for monitoring patient compliance in patients receiving sublingual formulations (e.g. subutex, suboxone) in the outpatient addiction treatment setting. However, transdermal dosing is an order of magnitude lower (mcg range) than sublingual (mg range). This retrospective analysis of tandem LC-MS urine samples from a single reference laboratory compares the results from two different buprenorphine treatment cohorts: transdermal pain treatment and sublingual detoxification. Samples from the group (n=54) undergoing pain treatment with the transdermal formulation showed urine concentrations of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide significantly lower than the range of those treated with sublingual preparations (often below the 5mcg/ml limit of detection). The analyte that differed the most between the two patient groups was norbuprenorphine, detected in only 16.2% of transdermal patients with an overall median concentration of < 3 ng/mL, versus 100% of sublingual patients with a median concentration of 88 ng/mL. Buprenorphine-glucuronide demonstrated the highest positive rate of detection at 97.3% in samples from the transdermal group with at least one positive detectable analyte. This study demonstrates that urine parent drug and metabolite profiles are markedly different for the distinct patient populations using sublingual and transdermal buprenorphine formulations. Failure to recognize the difference in urine concentrations may lead to a misinterpretation of noncompliance. Assays with high sensitivity for buprenorphine glucuronide will likely have greater relevance in the pain treatment setting. The use of buprenorphine for the management of chronic pain has risen rapidly since the FDA approved a transdermal formulation of this opioid in 2010. Consensus guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy highlight the importance of routine monitoring for patience compliance using periodic urine drug screens. The validity of the urine buprenorphine detection assay, currently in widespread use, was established for monitoring patient compliance in patients receiving sublingual formulations (e.g. subutex, suboxone) in the outpatient addiction treatment setting. However, transdermal dosing is an order of magnitude lower (mcg range) than sublingual (mg range). This retrospective analysis of tandem LC-MS urine samples from a single reference laboratory compares the results from two different buprenorphine treatment cohorts: transdermal pain treatment and sublingual detoxification. Samples from the group (n=54) undergoing pain treatment with the transdermal formulation showed urine concentrations of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide significantly lower than the range of those treated with sublingual preparations (often below the 5mcg/ml limit of detection). The analyte that differed the most between the two patient groups was norbuprenorphine, detected in only 16.2% of transdermal patients with an overall median concentration of < 3 ng/mL, versus 100% of sublingual patients with a median concentration of 88 ng/mL. Buprenorphine-glucuronide demonstrated the highest positive rate of detection at 97.3% in samples from the transdermal group with at least one positive detectable analyte. This study demonstrates that urine parent drug and metabolite profiles are markedly different for the distinct patient populations using sublingual and transdermal buprenorphine formulations. Failure to recognize the difference in urine concentrations may lead to a misinterpretation of noncompliance. Assays with high sensitivity for buprenorphine glucuronide will likely have greater relevance in the pain treatment setting.

High-sensitivity analysis of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide in plasma and urine by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry

A new method using ultra-fast liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (UFLC-MS/MS) was developed for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine and the metabolites norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-3β-glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine-3β-glucuronide in plasma and urine. Sample handling, sample preparation and solid-phase extraction procedures were optimized for maximum analyte recovery. All four analytes of interest were quantified by positive ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry after solid-phase microextraction. The lower limits of quantification in plasma were 1pg/mL for buprenorphine and buprenorphine glucuronide, and 10pg/mL for norbuprenorphine and norbuprenorphine glucuronide. The lower limits of quantitation in urine were 10pg/mL for buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine and their glucuronides. Overall extraction recoveries ranged from 68-100% in both matrices. Interassay precision and accuracy was within 10% for all four analytes in plasma and within 15% in urine. The method was applicable to pharmacokinetic studies of low-dose buprenorphine.

Improved Detection of Opioid Use in Chronic Pain Patients through Monitoring of Opioid Glucuronides in Urine

When chronic pain patients are suspected of being non-compliant, their therapy can be withdrawn. Therefore, sensitive and specific confirmatory testing is important for identifying diversion and adherence. This work aimed to develop a novel liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method to detect 14 opioids and six opioid glucuronide metabolites in urine with minimal sample preparation. Analytes included were morphine, oxymorphone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, fentanyl, norfentanyl, 6-monoacetylmorphine, meperidine, normeperidine, propoxyphene, methadone, buprenorphine, morphine-3-glucuronide, morphine-6-glucuronide, oxymorphone glucuronide, hydromorphone glucuronide, codeine-6-glucuronide and norbuprenorphine glucuronide. Samples were processed by centrifugation and diluted in equal volume with a deuterated internal standard containing 14 opioids and four opioid glucuronides. The separation of all compounds was complete in nine minutes. The assay was linear between 10 and 1,000 ng/mL (fentanyl 0.25-25 ng/mL). Intra-assay imprecision (500 ng/mL, fentanyl 12.5 ng/mL) ranged from 1.0 to 8.4% coefficient of variation. Inter-assay precision ranged from 2.9 to 6.0%. Recovery was determined by spiking five patient specimens with opioid and opioid glucuronide standards at 100 ng/mL (fentanyl 2.5 ng/mL). Recoveries ranged from 82 to 107% (median 98.9%). The method correlated with our current quantitative LC-MS-MS assay for opioids, which employs different chromatography. Internal standards were not available for every analyte to critically evaluate for ion suppression. Instead, a novel approach was designed to achieve the most rigorous quality control possible, in which the recovery of each analyte was evaluated in each negative sample.

Preliminary buprenorphine sublingual tablet pharmacokinetic data in plasma, oral fluid, and sweat during treatment of opioid-dependent pregnant women.

Buprenorphine is currently under investigation as a pharmacotherapy to treat pregnant women for opioid dependence. This research evaluates buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenophine (NBUP), buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-Gluc), and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) pharmacokinetics after high-dose (14-20 mg) BUP sublingual tablet administration in three opioid-dependent pregnant women. Oral fluid and sweat specimens were collected in addition to plasma specimens for 24 hours during gestation weeks 28 or 29 and 34, and 2 months after delivery. Time to maximum concentration was not affected by pregnancy; however, BUP and NBUP maximum concentration and area under the curve at 0 to 24 hours tended to be lower during pregnancy compared with postpartum levels. Statistically significant but weak positive correlations were found for BUP plasma and OF concentrations and BUP/NBUP ratios in plasma and oral fluid. Statistically significant negative correlations were observed for times of specimen collection and BUP and NBUP oral fluid/plasma ratios. BUP-Gluc and NBUP-Gluc were detected in only 5% of oral fluid specimens. In sweat, BUP and NBUP were detected in only four of 25 (12 or 24 hours) specimens in low concentrations (less than 2.4 ng/patch). These preliminary data describe BUP and metabolite pharmacokinetics in pregnant women and suggest that, like methadone, upward dose adjustments may be needed with advancing gestation.

Confirmatory analysis of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and glucuronide metabolites in plasma by LCMSMS. Application to umbilical cord plasma from buprenorphine-maintained pregnant women

An LCMSMS method was developed and fully validated for the simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-Gluc), and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) in 0.5mL plasma, fulfilling confirmation criteria with two transitions for each compound with acceptable relative ion intensities. Transitions monitored were 468.3>396.2 and 468.3>414.3 for BUP, 414.3>340.1 and 414.3>326.0 for NBUP, 644.3>468.1 and 644.3>396.3 for BUP-Gluc, and 590.3>414.3 and 590.3>396.2 for NBUP-Gluc. Linearity was 0.1-50ng/mL for BUP and BUP-Gluc, and 0.5-50ng/mL for NBUP and NBUP-Gluc. Intra-day, inter-day, and total assay imprecision (%RSD) were <16.8%, and analytical recoveries were 88.6-108.7%. Extraction efficiencies ranged from 71.1 to 87.1%, and process efficiencies 48.7 to 127.7%. All compounds showed ion enhancement, except BUP-Gluc that demonstrated ion suppression: variation between 10 different blank plasma specimens was <9.1%. In six umbilical cord plasma specimens from opioid-dependent pregnant women receiving 14-24mg/day BUP, NBUP-Gluc was the predominant metabolite (29.8+/-7.6ng/mL), with BUP-Gluc (4.6+/-4.8ng/mL), NBUP (1.5+/-0.8ng/mL) and BUP (0.4+/-0.2ng/mL). Although BUP biomarkers can be quantified in umbilical cord plasma in low ng/mL concentrations, the significance of these data as predictors of neonatal outcomes is currently unknown.

Simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine-glucuronide and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide in human umbilical cord by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

A LCMS method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-Gluc) and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) in human umbilical cord. Quantification was achieved by selected ion monitoring of precursor ions m/ z 468.4 for BUP; 414.3 for NBUP; 644.4 for BUP-Gluc and 590 for NBUP-Gluc. BUP and NBUP were identified by MS 2, with m/ z 396, 414 and 426 for BUP, and m/ z 340, 364 and 382 for NBUP. Glucuronide conjugates were identified by MS 3 with m/ z 396 and 414 for BUP-Gluc and m/ z 340 and 382 for NBUP-Gluc. The assay was linear 1–50 ng/g. Intra-day, inter-day and total assay imprecision (%RSD) were <14.5%, and analytical recovery ranged from 94.1% to 112.3% for all analytes. Extraction efficiencies were >66.3%, and process efficiency >73.4%. Matrix effect ranged, in absolute value, from 3.7% to 7.4% (CV < 21.8%, n = 8). The method was selective with no endogenous or exogenous interferences from 41 compounds evaluated. Sensitivity was high with limits of detection of 0.8 ng/g. In order to prove method applicability, an authentic umbilical cord obtained from an opioid-dependent pregnant woman receiving BUP pharmacotherapy was analyzed. Interestingly, BUP was not detected but concentrations of the other metabolites were NBUP-Gluc 13.4 ng/g, BUP-Gluc 3.5 ng/g and NBUP 1.2 ng/g.

Simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, buprenorphine glucuronide, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide in human placenta by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry

A LCMS method was developed and validated for the determination of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine glucuronide (BUP-Gluc), and norbuprenorphine glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) in placenta. Quantification was achieved by selected ion monitoring of m/z 468.4 (BUP), 414.3 (NBUP), 644.4 (BUP-Gluc), and 590 (NBUP-Gluc). BUP and NBUP were identified monitoring MS(2) fragments m/z 396, 414 and 426 for BUP, and 340, 364 and 382 for NBUP, and glucuronide conjugates monitoring MS(3) fragments m/z 396 and 414 for BUP-Gluc, and 340 and 382 for NBUP-Gluc. Linearity was 1-50 ng/g. Intra-day, inter-day and total assay imprecision (% RSD) were <13.4%, and analytical recoveries were 96.2-113.1%. Extraction efficiencies ranged from 40.7-68%, process efficiencies 38.8-70.5%, and matrix effect 1.3-15.4%. Limits of detection were 0.8 ng/g for all compounds. An authentic placenta from an opioid-dependent pregnant woman receiving BUP pharmacotherapy was analyzed. BUP was not detected but metabolite concentrations were NBUP-Gluc 46.6, NBUP 15.7 and BUP-Gluc 3.2 ng/g.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry assay for the simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and metabolites in human urine

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the simultaneous quantification of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), buprenorphine glucuronide (BUP-Gluc), and norbuprenorphine glucuronide (NBUP-Gluc) in human urine was developed and fully validated. Extensive endogenous and exogenous interferences were evaluated and limits of quantification were identified empirically. Analytical ranges were 5-1,000 ng/mL for BUP and BUP-Gluc and 25-1,000 ng/mL for NBUP and NBUP-Gluc. Intra-assay and interassay imprecision were less than 17% and recovery was 93-116%. Analytes were stable at room temperature, at 4 degrees C, and for three freeze-thaw cycles. This accurate and precise assay has sufficient sensitivity and specificity for urine analysis of specimens collected from individuals treated with BUP for opioid dependence.

Interaction between buprenorphine and atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir

Opioid addiction and HIV disease frequently co-occur. Adverse drug interactions have been reported between methadone and some HIV medications, but less is known about interactions between buprenorphine, an opioid partial agonist used to treat opioid dependence, and HIV therapeutics. This study examined drug interactions between buprenorphine and the protease inhibitors atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir. Opioid-dependent, buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained, HIV-negative volunteers ( n = 10 per protease inhibitor) participated in two 24-h sessions to determine pharmacokinetics of (1) buprenorphine and (2) buprenorphine and atazanavir (400 mg daily) or atazanavir/ritonavir (300/100 mg daily) following administration for 5 days. Objective opiate withdrawal scale scores and mini-mental state examination were determined prior to and following antiretroviral administration to examine pharmacodynamic effects. Pharmacokinetics of atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir were compared in subjects and matched, healthy controls ( n = 10 per protease inhibitor) to determine effects of buprenorphine. With atazanavir and atazanavir/ritonavir, respectively concentrations of buprenorphine ( p < 0.001, p < 0.001), norbuprenorphine ( p = 0.026, p = 0.006), buprenorphine glucuronide ( p = 0.002, p < 0.001), and norbuprenorphine glucuronide (NS, p = 0.037) increased. Buprenorphine treatment did not significantly alter atazanavir or ritonavir concentrations. Three buprenorphine/naloxone-maintained participants reported increased sedation with atazanavir/ritonavir. Atazanavir or atazanavir/ritonavir may increase buprenorphine and buprenorphine metabolite concentrations and might require a decreased buprenorphine dose.

Rapid Quantification of Buprenorphine-Glucuronide and Norbuprenorphine-Glucuronide in Human Urine by LC-MS-MS

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of buprenorphine-glucuronide (BUP-G) and norbuprenorphine-glucuronide (NBUP-G) in human urine. The method included a dilution step followed by filtration through a Mini-Uniprep Filter and direct injection onto the LC column. The analytes were quantified in multiple reactions monitoring mode using one transition ion. Norbuprenorpine-d(3) (NBUP-d(3)) was used as the internal standard. The concentration ranges were 6-161 ng/mL for BUP-G and 12-295 ng/mL for NBUP-G. Recoveries determined after filtration for the analytes were 75%. The between-day precision of the method was in the range of 4.8-11%. The limits of quantification were found to be 4.6 ng/mL for BUP-G and 11.8 ng/mL for NBUP-G. Approximately 1000 samples from law enforcement, prison inmates, probation services, and hospitals were analyzed by the presented method. The ratios of drug glucuronides versus creatinine were calculated for a selection of samples (n = 151), where there was information on treatment with buprenorphine between 16 and 20 mg/day. The majority (86%) of the samples had a ratio of BUP-G/creatinine below 570 microg/g, and 76% of the samples had NBUP-G/creatinine lower than 1060 microg/g. The LC-MS-MS method proved to be robust and specific for the determination of BUP-G and NBUP-G in urine.

Lack of effect of CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole on transdermally administered buprenorphine

Objective To evaluate the effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and its metabolites following application of a 10-mg buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS). Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, 2-treatment, 2-period crossover study with 20 healthy male and female subjects. Treatments: BTDS for 7 days with ketoconazole (200 mg po, bid) or placebo in crossover fashion. Results The 90% confidence intervals for the estimated ratios of population geometric means for buprenorphine AUCt and Cmax were within 80% to 125%. Plasma concentrations of norbuprenorphine, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide, were detected in both treatments and were not lower in the BTDS+ ketoconazole treatment. Plasma concentrations of buprenorphine-3-glucuronide were measurable in 5 out of 18 BTDS+ ketoconazole subjects. No apparent safety concerns were identified. Eight subjects had hyperpigmentation at the application site (4 events were resolved and 4 were continuing). Conclusions Plasma concentrations of buprenorphine from BTDS did not differ during co-medication with ketoconazole 200 mg bid vs. placebo. BTDS dose adjustment is not needed for subjects taking concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77, P78–P78; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.12.188

Simultaneous determination of buprenorphine, norbuprenorphine, and buprenorphine–glucuronide in plasma by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry

For the first time, an LC–MS–MS method has been developed for the simultaneous analysis of buprenorphine (BUP), norbuprenorphine (NBUP), and buprenorphine–glucuronide (BUPG) in plasma. Analytes were isolated from plasma by C 18 SPE and separated by gradient RP-LC. Electrospray ionization and MS–MS analyses were carried out using a PE-Sciex API-3000 tandem mass spectrometer. The m/z 644→ m/z 468 transition was monitored for BUPG, whereas for BUP, BUP-d 4, NBUP, and NBUP-d 3 it was necessary to monitor the surviving parent ions in order to achieve the required sensitivity. The method exhibited good linearity from 0.1 to 50 ng/ml ( r 2≥0.998). Extraction recovery was higher than 77% for BUPG and higher than 88% for both BUP and NBUP. The LOQ was established at 0.1 ng/ml for the three analytes. The method was validated on plasma samples collected in a controlled intravenous and sublingual buprenorphine administration study. Norbuprenorphine–glucuronide was also tentatively detected in plasma by monitoring the m/z 590→ m/z 414 transition.