This paper presents the prediction capability of the density of near- and super-critical hydrocarbon mixtures, especially diesel fuel, by three cubic equations of state (EoS), which include PPR78, PSRK and RK-PR, two virial EoS that are BWR and SBWR, and PC-SAFT EoS. Comparison with published measured density of three different hydrocarbon mixtures, which are methane-propane-pentane, heptane-octane, and RP3 aviation kerosene, revealed that all the equations of state predict well the density of the gas phase. On the other hand, a comparison with RP3 experimental data showed that all EoS over-predict the density of gas-like supercritical phase. However, to ascertain the findings of this comparison, experimental data for other hydrocarbon mixtures at such a state are required. The results showed also that PC-SAFT is a suitable choice for liquid and liquid-like density calculations with an AAD of 2.9%, closely followed by SBWR and BWR with AAD values of 3.7% and 4.0%, respectively, while RK-PR and PPR78 produce reliable prediction of the density of liquid and liquid-like supercritical phases of hydrocarbons with an AAD of 5.5% and 4.4%, respectively. RK-PR and SBWR are found as the most accurate EoSs for calculating the density of hydrocarbons mixtures at the transition from liquid-like to gas-like supercritical phases with an AAD of 11.2% and 12.8%, respectively. Using zero and non-zero binary interaction parameters with PPR78, PSRK, and PC-SAFT showed negligible effect on the density calculation. Comparison of the predictions with the experimental diesel density showed that BWR has the best results, followed by PC-SAFT. RK-PR is found to deviate by less than 5% in predicting the diesel density for all examined surrogates. The predictions of diesel density by different EoS at near- and super-critical conditions are compared with each other because of the lack of published experimental data. This comparison showed that RK-PR can be used, with a reasonable accuracy and computational cost, for predicting the density of both the liquid-like phase and transition interval, and PPR78 for the gas-like supercritical phase. On the other hand, more accurate predictions of the liquid-like phase density can be achieved using BWR, and that of the transition interval and gas-like phase can be realized by SBWR but with a higher computational cost.
Read full abstract