Non-viral Etiology Research Articles

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Situation in Indonesia: A Systematic Review of Clinical Staging and Histological Characteristics at the Time of Diagnosis

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. However, systematic data on HCC characteristics in Indonesia are limited. Objective: To summarize the body of literature on the characteristics of HCC in Indonesia. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases without date restrictions. Clinical studies investigating the characteristics of HCC exclusively in Indonesia were eligible for inclusion. Risk-of-bias assessments were conducted, and results were presented descriptively. Results: Ten studies comprising 1,389 HCC patients were included. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, reported in 5 studies, revealed a predominance of intermediate to advanced stages (B and C) at diagnosis. Child-Pugh scores, available for 7 studies, indicated variability in liver function, with Child-Pugh A ranging from 12.0% to 85.7%. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was the primary etiological factor, with prevalence ranging from 53.8% to 84.0%. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was less common (1.0% to 25.21%). Non-viral etiologies represented a substantial proportion, reaching up to 37.4% of cases. The mean age at diagnosis ranged from 52.43 to 63.1 years. Conclusion: This review highlights the late-stage presentation of HCC in Indonesia, the predominance of HBV as an etiological factor, and a significant burden of non-viral HCC. The findings underscore the need for improved early detection strategies, strengthened HBV prevention efforts, and increased attention to metabolic risk factors. Regional variations in HCC characteristics suggest the need for tailored approaches to HCC management across different parts of Indonesia.

Hepatic decompensation is the major driver of mortality in patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: The impact of successful antiviral treatment.

Unlike other malignancies, hepatic functional reserve competes with tumor progression in determining the risk of mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the relative contribution of hepatic decompensation over tumor progression in influencing overall survival (OS) has not been assessed in combination immunotherapy recipients. From the AB-real observational study (n = 898), we accrued 571 patients with advanced/unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, Child-Pugh A class treated with frontline atezolizumab + bevacizumab (AB). Hepatic decompensation and tumor progression during follow-up were studied in relationship to patients' OS using a time-dependent Cox model. Baseline characteristics were evaluated as predictors of decompensation in competing risks analysis. During a median follow-up of 11.0 months (95% CI: 5.1-19.7), 293 patients (51.3%) developed tumor progression without decompensation, and 94 (16.5%) developed decompensation. In multivariable time-dependent analysis, decompensation (HR: 19.04, 95% CI: 9.75-37.19), hepatocellular carcinoma progression (HR: 9.91, 95% CI: 5.85-16.78), albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade 2/3 (HR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.69-2.77), and number of nodules >3(HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.28-2.08) were independently associated with OS. Pretreatment ALBI grade 2/3 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 3.35, 95% CI: 1.98-5.67) was independently associated with decompensation, whereas viral etiology was protective (sHR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.87). Among patients with viral etiology, effective antiviral treatment was significantly associated with a lower risk of decompensation (sHR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.93). Hepatic decompensation identifies patients with the worst prognosis following AB and is more common in patients with baseline ALBI >1 and nonviral etiology. Effective antiviral treatment may protect from decompensation, highlighting the prognostic disadvantage of patients with nonviral etiologies and the importance of multidisciplinary management to maximize OS.

Characteristics and survival of advanced untreated hepatocellular carcinoma of non-viral etiology.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor and presents late. The underlying etiology of HCC is changing rapidly. HCC in Sri Lanka is unique due to its predominant non-viral etiology (nvHCC) but lacks survival data. Data was collected from patients who presented with HCC from 2011 to 2018. There were 560/568 (98.6%) nvHCC. The patients who were not candidates for tumor-specific treatment (149/560 [26.7%]) were selected. Population characteristics, demographic data, tumor characteristics, survival and factors affecting survival were analyzed. The median age was 64years (range 30-88) and 86% (n = 129) were males. As many as124 (83%) were cirrhotic. The overall performance score was 80%.Nearly 21/124 tumors were detected in cirrhotic screening. Tumors were single nodular in 32 (21%), up to three nodules in 28 (18%), more than three nodules in 33 (22%) and diffusely infiltrating in 56 (37%). The major venous invasions were present in 78 (52.3%). Extra-hepatic tumor spread was seen in 19 (12.7%) (lungs 13[72.2%], bones 2 [11.1%]). The median survival of patients receiving palliative care was three months (1-43months). Tumor size and cirrhotic status were significant predictors in univariate analysis. A quarter of nvHCCs were not amenable to treatment at presentation as they had dismal survival. P/126/09/2021.

Outcomes in the Asian subgroup of the phase III randomised HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

In the global, phase III HIMALAYA study in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) improved overall survival (OS) vs. sorafenib; durvalumab was non-inferior to sorafenib. HBV is the predominant HCC aetiology in most of Asia vs. HCV or non-viral aetiologies in Western countries and Japan. This analysis evaluated safety and efficacy outcomes for STRIDE and durvalumab monotherapy vs. sorafenib, in HIMALAYA participants enrolled in Asia, excluding Japan. In HIMALAYA, participants were randomised to STRIDE, durvalumab, or sorafenib. The Asian subgroup in this analysis included participants enrolled in Hong Kong, India, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. OS, objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST, version 1.1), and safety were assessed in the Asian subgroup and in an exploratory subgroup of participants in Hong Kong and Taiwan. The Asian subgroup included 479 participants randomised to STRIDE (n= 156), durvalumab (n= 167), or sorafenib (n= 156). OS was improved for STRIDE vs. sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.68; 95% CI 0.52-0.89). The OS HR for durvalumab vs. sorafenib was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64-1.06). In Hong Kong and Taiwan (n= 141), OS HRs for STRIDE vs. sorafenib and durvalumab vs. sorafenib were 0.44 (95% CI 0.26-0.77) and 0.64 (95% CI 0.37-1.08), respectively. In the Asian subgroup, ORR (including unconfirmed responses) was numerically higher for STRIDE (28.2%) and durvalumab (18.6%) vs. sorafenib (9.0%), and Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were numerically lower for STRIDE (19.9%) and durvalumab (13.3%) vs. sorafenib (30.5%). STRIDE improved outcomes vs. sorafenib in the Asian subgroup. These results support the benefits of STRIDE for participants with uHCC globally, including in the Asia-Pacific region. NCT03298451. The global, phase III HIMALAYA study found that the STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab) regimen improved overall survival (OS), including long-term OS vs. sorafenib, and that durvalumab monotherapy was non-inferior to sorafenib in participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there are differences in the aetiology and clinical practices related to HCC in parts of Asia, compared to Western countries and Japan, which could lead to differences in treatment outcomes between these regions. The results of this analysis demonstrate the benefits of STRIDE for participants in the Asia-Pacific region, consistent with the full, global study population. Overall, these findings continue to support the use of STRIDE in a diverse population, reflective of uHCC globally.

167P Non-viral aetiology subgroup of the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)

167P Non-viral aetiology subgroup of the phase III HIMALAYA study of tremelimumab (T) plus durvalumab (D) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)

Statins in Chronic Liver Disease: Review of the Literature and Future Role.

Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a major contributor to global mortality, morbidity, and healthcare burden. Progress in pharmacotherapeutic for CLD management is lagging given its impact on the global population. While statins are indicated for the management of dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease, their role in CLD prevention and treatment is emerging. Beyond their lipid-lowering effects, their liver-related mechanisms of action are multifactorial and include anti-inflammatory, antiproliferative, and immune-protective effects. In this review, we highlight what is known about the clinical benefits of statins in viral and nonviral etiologies of CLD and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and explore key mechanisms and pathways targeted by statins. While their benefits may span the spectrum of CLD and potentially HCC treatment, their role in CLD chemoprevention is likely to have the largest impact. As emerging data suggest that genetic variants may impact their benefits, the role of statins in precision hepatology will need to be further explored.

Increased prevalence but decreased survival of nonviral hepatocellular carcinoma compared to viral hepatocellular carcinoma in recent ten years

Due to the comprehensive hepatitis B virus vaccination program in Taiwan since 1986, the development of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C infection and covered by National health insurance. Besides, the increased prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and currently, approved therapy for NAFLD remain developing. The etiology of liver-related diseases such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma required reinterpretation. This study aimed to analyze the incidence and outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to viral (hepatitis B and hepatitis C) infection compared to that of nonviral etiology. We retrospectively analyzed patients with HCC from January 2011 to December 2020 from the cancer registry at our institution. Viral-related hepatitis was defined as hepatitis B surface antigen positivity or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positivity. A total of 2748 patients with HCC were enrolled, of which 2188 had viral-related HCC and 560 had nonviral-related HCC. In viral HCC group, the median age at diagnosis was significantly lower (65 years versus 71 years, p < 0.001), and the prevalence of early-stage HCC, including stage 0 and stage A Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer, was significantly higher (52.9% versus 33.6%, p < 0.001). In nonviral HCC group, alcohol use was more common (39.9% versus 30.1%, p < 0.001), the prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was higher (54.5% versus 35.1%, p < 0.001), and obesity was common (25.0% versus 20.5%, p = 0.026). The prevalence of nonviral HCC increased significantly from 19.2 to 19.3% and 23.0% in the last 10 years (p = 0.046). Overall survival was better in the viral HCC group (5.95 years versus 4.00 years, p < 0.001). In the early stage of HCC, overall survival was still better in the viral HCC group (p < 0.001). The prevalence of nonviral HCC has significantly increased in the last ten years. The overall survival was significantly lower in the nonviral HCC, perhaps because the rate of early HCC detection is lower in nonviral HCC and anti-viral therapy. To detect nonviral HCC early, we should evaluate liver fibrosis in high-risk groups (including people with obesity or T2DM with NAFLD/NASH and alcoholic liver disease) and regular follow-up for those with liver fibrosis, regardless of cirrhosis.

Disease Etiology Impact on Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab: A Real-World, Multicenter Study

Introduction: The impact of etiology on response to immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is being debated, with contrasting findings between early and recent post hoc analyses of IMbrave-150 and metanalyses of clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blockers. As a results, it is not clear whether the first-line systemic treatment atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B) is equally effective in viral and nonviral patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 885 HCC patients treated with the first-line A + B from multiple centers from Eastern and Western countries, 53.9% having viral and 46.1% nonviral etiology. Baseline clinical and laboratory characteristics were analyzed with uni- and multivariate models to explore potential differences on overall survival (OS), time-to-progression (TTP), disease control rates (DCRs) based on etiology and to identify putative prognostic factors in etiology subgroups. Treatment toxicities and access to the second-line treatments and outcomes were also reported and compared between etiologies. Results: Overall, no statistically significant differences were found in median OS (mOS: viral 15.9 months; nonviral 16.3 months), TTP (mTTP: viral 8.3 months; nonviral 7.2 months), and DCRs (viral 78.1%; nonviral 80.8%) based on etiology. Prognostic factors of survival and progression were mainly shared between viral and nonviral etiologies, including alpha-fetoprotein, aspartate transaminase, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and ALBI score. Exploratory analyses highlighted a possible stronger association of immunological factors, i.e., NLR and eosinophil count, to treatment outcomes in viral patients. The toxicity profile, the access to and type of the second-line treatments and their outcome in terms of OS almost overlap in the two etiology subgroups. Conclusion: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab efficacy does not vary according to underlying etiology of HCC in a multicenter, real-world population, matching recent post hoc findings from the IMbrave-150 trial. Preliminary analyses suggest that some prognostic factors differ between viral and nonviral patients, potentially due to biological and immunological differences. Prospective and comparative trials stratifying by etiology are warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.

Predictors of mortality in acute encephalitis syndrome in children

Encephalitis is an important cause of morbidity, mortality and neurological sequelae in children globally. Causes are diverse and include viral and non-viral etiology as well as autoimmune processes. In the west autoimmune encephalitis are now most common than any single infectious cause, but in India infectious causes are still most common. It is critical to evaluate the immediately to reduce mortality and sequalae in Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES) patients. This study has been done to find out different predictors of mortality in outcome of AES at the end of hospital stay. To find out the predictors of mortality in children with acute encephalitis syndrome between age group of 1 month to 14 years. This was a cross sectional analytical study conducted over a period of two years. A total of 310 subjects were included in the study. Different clinical and laboratory parameters were taken to know the different significant predictors of mortality. A total of 310 cases were taken for the study from the age group of 1 month to 14 years. Out of these AES cases 22.5% cases died and 77.5% patients were discharged. Higher mortality was seen in 11-14 years of age group and females had higher mortality as compared to males. Only 5 variables that is refractory seizure, GCS&amp;#60;8, features of raised ICT, shock and requirement of ventilatory support were found to be significant (p&amp;#60;0.05) in predictors of mortality. Other variables like age, sex, socioeconomic status, fever altered sensorium, seizure, meningeal sign, laboratory investigations like serum sodium, total leucocyte count, serum creatinine, duration of hospitalisation were not found to be significant(p&amp;#62;0.05). AES is a disorder of multiple and varying etiology with significant mortality and morbidity. Early diagnosis, appropriate investigation, prompt management go a long way in reducing mortality and sequalae in AES. Refractory seizure, Glasgow Coma Score&amp;#60;8, features of raised Intracranial Tension, Shock and requirement of ventilatory support prognosticate the outcome of Acute Encephalitis Syndrome.

Noncoding RNAs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Potential Applications in Combined Therapeutic Strategies and Promising Candidates of Treatment Response.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing, and 40% of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Over the past 5 years, the number of clinically available treatments has dramatically increased for HCC, making patient management particularly complex. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the overall survival of patients, showing a durable treatment benefit over time and a different response pattern with respect to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although there is improved survival in responder cases, a sizeable group of patients are primary progressors or are ineligible for immunotherapy. Indeed, patients with nonviral etiologies, such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and alterations in specific driver genes might be less responsive to immunotherapy. Therefore, improving the comprehension of mechanisms of drug resistance and identifying biomarkers that are informative of the best treatment approach are required actions to improve patient survival. Abundant evidence indicates that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) are pivotal players in cancer. Molecular mechanisms through which ncRNAs exert their effects in cancer progression and drug resistance have been widely investigated. Nevertheless, there are no studies summarizing the synergistic effect between ncRNA-based strategies and TKIs or ICIs in the preclinical setting. This review aims to provide up-to-date information regarding the possible use of ncRNAs as therapeutic targets in association with molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapies and as predictive tools for the selection of optimized treatment options in advanced HCCs.

The impact of COVID-19 on the diagnosis and treatment of HCC: analysis of a nationwide registry for advanced liver diseases (REAL)

The number of cancer cases diagnosed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has decreased. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on the clinical practice of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a novel nationwide REgistry for Advanced Liver diseases (REAL) in Japan. We retrieved data of patients initially diagnosed with HCC between January 2018 and December 2021. We adopted tumor size as the primary outcome measure and compared it between the pre-COVID-19 (2018 and 2019) and COVID-19 eras (2020 and 2021). We analyzed 13,777 patients initially diagnosed with HCC (8074 in the pre-COVID-19 era and 5703 in the COVID-19 era). The size of the maximal intrahepatic tumor did not change between the two periods (mean [SD] = 4.3 [3.6] cm and 4.4 [3.6] cm), whereas the proportion of patients with a single tumor increased slightly from 72.0 to 74.3%. HCC was diagnosed at a similar Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage. However, the proportion of patients treated with systemic therapy has increased from 5.4 to 8.9%. The proportion of patients with a non-viral etiology significantly increased from 55.3 to 60.4%. Although the tumor size was significantly different among the etiologies, the subgroup analysis showed that the tumor size did not change after stratification by etiology. In conclusion, the characteristics of initially diagnosed HCC remained unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, regardless of differences in etiology. A robust surveillance system should be established particularly for non-B, non-C etiology to detect HCC in earlier stages.

Organ-specific response with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab versus lenvatinib for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

467 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments have become the mainstay of first-line treatment for unresectable HCC, but there has been a concern that intrahepatic HCC lesions may be less responsive to ICI monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study included 386 patients with Child-Pugh A unresectable HCC who were treated with first-line atezolizumab-bevacizumab (n = 217) or lenvatinib (n = 169). The organ-specific response was separately evaluated according to the site of the lesions: liver, lung, lymph node (LN), and intra-abdomen based on a radiological evaluation adopted from RECIST v 1.1. Up to 2 lesions were chosen as target lesions in each organ for the organ-specific response evaluation. Results: The median age was 60 years. The majority of study patients were male in both groups (83.4% and 85.8% in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab and lenvatinib groups, respectively). The etiology of HCC was similar between the two groups: hepatitis B virus infection was the most common etiology in both groups (73.3% and 65.7% in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab and lenvatinib groups, respectively), while 21.2% and 29.0% of patients had non-viral HCC, respectively. Extrahepatic spread was identified in 76.0% and 74.6% of patients in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab and lenvatinib groups, respectively: lung, LN, and intra-abdominal metastases were present in 39.6% vs. 39.1%, 30.0% vs. 33.1% and 16.6% vs. 15.4% of patients, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 30% reduction in the tumor burden for each organ category was higher overall in the atezolizumab-bevacizumab group than in the lenvatinib group: 20.2% vs. 11.8%, 23.0% vs. 12.2%, 27.9% vs. 17.9%, and 33.3% vs. 15.0% for intrahepatic, lung, LN and intra-abdominal lesions, respectively. The corresponding values for the subgroup with a viral etiology were 17.3% vs. 8.1%, 18.8% vs. 13.3%, 28.9% vs. 3.6% and 36.0% vs. 12.5%, respectively. Among patients with a non-viral etiology, atezolizumab-bevacizumab was not clearly associated with a better organ-specific response for the LN and intra-abdominal lesions: 20.0% vs. 54.5% and 20.0% vs. 25.0%, respectively, for a ≥ 30% reduction in the tumor burden. Conclusions: Compared to lenvatinib, atezolizumab-bevacizumab was associated with a favorable organ-specific response regardless of the site of the tumor lesions. Unlike anti-PD-1 monotherapy, atezolizumab-bevacizumab had a comparable organ-specific response between intrahepatic and extrahepatic lesions, especially for those with viral etiology HCCs.

Results from a phase 2 study of triplet blockade of the IL-27, PD-(L)1, and VEGF pathways with casdozokitug (casdozo, SRF388) in combination with atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

470 Background: Casdozo is the first in class and only clinical-stage IL-27 targeting antibody, which neutralizes IL-27 in the tumor microenvironment and stimulates antitumor response. A phase (Ph) 1 study demonstrated a favorable safety profile and antitumor activity alone and in combination with PD-1 blockade in indications known to have high levels of IL-27 pathway activation, such as HCC (NCT04374877). Casdozo induced increases in serum IFN-g and NK cell gene activation, indicating an immune response and reversal of IL-27-mediated immune suppression. IHC evaluation of HCC commercial tissue microarrays revealed that most HCC samples express the target: IL-27+ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs, internal data). We present the safety and antitumor activity of this immunoregulatory cytokine antagonist given in combination with atezo/bev in uHCC in the open-label phase of a randomized Ph 2 trial. Methods: Patients (pts) with untreated uHCC received casdozo 10 mg/kg, atezo 1200 mg, and bev 15mg/kg IV every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, with key secondary endpoints being investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST1.1 and mRECIST. Results: As of August 9, 2023, 30 pts were treated with casdozo/atezo/bev. Most pts were male (77%), Asian (67%), ECOG PS 1 (77%), had viral etiology (53% HBV, 17% HCV), and had poor-risk disease as evidenced by metastatic spread (70%) and macrovascular invasion (23%). 47% had AFP ≥400ng/mL. Median time on therapy was 28 wks (3-69). Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were low grade, with proteinuria (33%), fatigue (20%), decreased appetite (20%), and hypertension (20%) being most common. Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 33%, with only hypertension (13%) arising in ≥10% of pts. TRAEs resulting in any study drug discontinuation was 20%. No deaths were attributed to study drugs. In the 29 response-evaluable pts, 67% experienced any tumor shrinkage with a 38% ORR (3 CRs, 5 confirmed PRs, 3 unconfirmed PRs). In the 28 pts evaluable for mRECIST, ORR was 43% (n=12). More than 50% of pts remain on therapy. Available archival tissue of responders (n=4) all expressed IL-27+ TAMs by IHC, including tumors of viral (n=3) and nonviral etiologies (n=1). Conclusions: Triplet blockade of the IL-27, VEGF, and PD-(L)1 pathways with casdozo/atezo/bev has an acceptable safety profile to date with promising antitumor activity in uHCC that warrants continued exploration. Toxicity was consistent with the known profiles of the agents, with no new safety signals identified. Biomarker analysis to evaluate immune response and associations of IL-27 pathway and clinical outcomes is ongoing. Additional clinical studies of casdozo in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor toripalimab are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT05359861 .

Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

563 Background: Recent advances in systemic therapies have resulted in improved overall survivals (OS) for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). The most commonly utilized primary endpoint for phase III trials in aHCC is OS. A robust surrogate endpoint (SEP) can reduce time and financial costs of future trials and accelerate regulatory approvals of new therapies. We conducted a literature-based meta-analysis to evaluate SEPs for OS in aHCC. Methods: Randomized controlled trials evaluating systemic therapies in aHCC published 2007 - 2023 were identified through a systemic literature search of Cochrane and Medline databases as well as of abstracts presented at ASCO and ESMO meetings. Hazard ratios (HR) for OS and progression-free survival (PFS) and time to progression (TTP) were extracted. ΔORR was calculated as the difference in overall response rates (ORR) between control and experimental arms. Pearson correlation and mixed-effects meta-regression analyses were performed. Surrogate threshold effect (STE) was determined for each comparison when possible. A p &lt; 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: 26 trials were identified in the first-line setting with 14,827 patients and 11 trials in the subsequent-line setting with 5,316 patients. In first-line trials, immunotherapy (IO) is associated with higher ORR than other agents (p=0.003). There are statistically significant correlations between HRs of PFS/TTP/ΔORR and OS (Table). The relationship between HR-PFS and HR-OS persists in trials with or without IO, but only in trials enrolling &lt; 30% patients of non-viral aetiologies. In subsequent-line trials, there are statistically significant correlations between HRs of PFS/TTP and OS (Table). STE for HR PFS is 0.68 and 0.87 respectively for 1st and subsequent line trials. Conclusions: There are moderate to strong correlations between PFS and OS in aHCC in first-line and subsequent line trials. STE for HR-PFS of 0.68 in first-line and 0.87 in subsequent-line settings can guide sample size calculation in future clinical trials. [Table: see text]

A Comparison of Presentation, Treatment, and Survival After Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Viral and Non-Viral Etiology in Damietta, Egypt, 2007-2019.

The difference in prognosis between patients diagnosed with viral versus non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Egypt remains unclear. We used data from patients diagnosed with HCC between 2007 and 2019 from a large monocentric retrospective cohort at the Damietta Oncology referral center (northern Egypt). Presentation and treatment were compared between viral versus non-viral etiology HCC patients. Survival was compared relying on univariate and multivariate Cox regressions. Data from 4714 HCC patients were analyzed. Among them, 204 (4.3%) presented with a non-viral etiology. Patients with non-viral versus viral etiology had a similar presentation overall, especially regarding the BCLC stage at HCC diagnosis. After controlling for various individual characteristics, patients with non-viral versus viral etiology had poorer survival (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.244; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.069-1.447). Despite similar features, patients with non-viral- related HCC had poorer survival compared to patients with viral-related HCC.

Understanding the Dynamics of Human Papillomavirus and Diagnostic Discrepancies in Cervical Pathology: A Single Center Experience.

Cervical cancer (CC) is the most prevalent gynecological malignancy and a leading cause of death among women. It is primarily caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, with 99.7% of cases showing high-risk HPV genotypes. This study sheds light on HPV dynamics as well as the discrepancies of different CC screening modalities results while highlighting factors that may have contributed to such a scenario. Moreover, we underscore the importance of the non-viral etiology of CC as well. We examined the current trends of HPV infection and its effects on cervical health in women treated at a tertiary care center in Belgrade, Serbia. Patients with abnormal colposcopy findings like dysplasia and re-epithelization were more likely to test negative for HPV (p < 0.001). Interestingly, women with a positive Pap smear tested HPV negative significantly more often (p = 0.041). Finally, HPV-positive individuals were more likely to have CIN I and II histologies (p < 0.001), while CIN III occurred equally in women with and without the virus. It may be inferred that inconsistencies in detecting HPV and the presence of cervical lesions may eventually result in adjustments to screening guidelines, as is crucial to adopt a meticulous approach to promote periodical CC screening, as initial samples may test negative for HPV.

Updates in Characteristics and Survival Rates of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Nationwide Cohort of Real-World US Patients, 2003-2021.

Causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may change as treatments become available for some liver diseases. We examined the distribution of HCC cause and survival of a nationwide cohort of insured patients. Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM), 2003-2021. A total of 34707 patients with HCC were included: mean age: 68.3±11.6 years, 61% male, 62% Caucasian, 74% cirrhosis. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was the most common etiology (38.9%), then hepatitis C virus (HCV) (25.3%), cryptogenic (18.0%), alcohol-associated liver disease (9.4%), other liver diseases (5.8%) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) at 2.6%. NAFLD patients were the oldest (mean age 71.1±11.2) and had the highest Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (mean 10.5±3.9), while HCV were the youngest (mean age 64.2±9.2 years) and HBV had the lowest CCI (mean 7.2±4.4) (both P<0.0001). The overall 5-year survival was 18.8% (95% CI 18.2-19.3) but was lower in the recent 2014-2021 period vs 2003-2013 (18.1% vs 19.5%, P=0.003). The 2014-2021 cohort (inclusive of HCV treatment advances) was significantly older, with more females, fewer Caucasians, more African Americans, more Hispanics, fewer Asians, more cirrhosis, more NAFLD, and higher CCI (all P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, males (aHR: 1.13), Caucasians (aHR: 1.46), African Americans (aHR: 1.53) and Hispanics (aHR: 1.28) vs Asians, 2014-2021 (vs 2003-2013) cohort (aHR: 1.12), NAFLD (aHR: 1.14) or cryptogenic liver disease (aHR: 1.45) were associated with increased mortality (all P<0.001). HCC patients in more recent time 2014-2021 were more likely to be older, more likely to have nonviral etiology, and had worse survival compared to those from 2003 to 2013.

Validation of the novel GLAS algorithm as an aid in the detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis based on GP73, LG2m, age, and sex

BackgroundDiagnosis of liver disease at earlier stages can improve outcomes and reduce the risk of progression to malignancy. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of liver disease, but is invasive and sample acquisition errors are common. Serum biomarkers for liver function and fibrosis, combined with patient factors, may allow for noninvasive detection of liver disease. In this pilot study, we tested and validated the performance of an algorithm that combines GP73 and LG2m serum biomarkers with age and sex (GLAS) to differentiate between patients with liver disease and healthy individuals in two independent cohorts.MethodsTo develop the algorithm, prototype immunoassays were used to measure GP73 and LG2m in residual serum samples collected between 2003 and 2016 from patients with staged fibrosis and cirrhosis of viral or non-viral etiology (n = 260) and healthy subjects (n = 133). The performance of five predictive models using combinations of age, sex, GP73, and/or LG2m from the development cohort were tested. Residual samples from a separate cohort with liver disease (fibrosis, cirrhosis, or chronic liver disease; n = 395) and healthy subjects (n = 106) were used to validate the best performing model.ResultsGP73 and LG2m concentrations were higher in patients with liver disease than healthy controls and higher in those with cirrhosis than fibrosis in both the development and validation cohorts. The best performing model included both GP73 and LG2m plus age and sex (GLAS algorithm), which had an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90–0.95), a sensitivity of 88.8%, and a specificity of 75.9%. In the validation cohort, the GLAS algorithm had an estimated an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90–0.95), a sensitivity of 91.1%, and a specificity of 80.2%. In both cohorts, the GLAS algorithm had high predictive probability for distinguishing between patients with liver disease versus healthy controls.ConclusionsGP73 and LG2m serum biomarkers, when combined with age and sex (GLAS algorithm), showed high sensitivity and specificity for detection of liver disease in two independent cohorts. The GLAS algorithm will need to be validated and refined in larger cohorts and tested in longitudinal studies for differentiating between stable versus advancing liver disease over time.

Global trends in hepatocellular carcinoma epidemiology: implications for screening, prevention and therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality rates are increasing globally, and particularly in the Western world. Cirrhosis remains the predominant risk factor for HCC. However, epidemiological shifts in the incidence of HCC from patients with virus-related liver disease to those with non-viral aetiologies, including alcohol-associated and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, have important implications for prevention, surveillance and treatment. Hepatitis B vaccination and antiviral therapy for hepatitis B and C are effective for primary prevention of virus-related HCCs, but chemoprevention strategies for non-viral liver disease remain an unmet need. Emerging data suggest associations between aspirin, statins, metformin and coffee and reduced HCC incidence, although none has been proved to be causally related. Secondary prevention of HCC via semi-annual surveillance is associated with improvements in early detection and thus reduced mortality; however, current tools, including abdominal ultrasonography, have suboptimal sensitivity for thedetection of earlystage HCC, particularly in patients with obesity and/or non-viral liver disease. Promising blood-based or imaging-based surveillance strategies are emerging, although these approaches require further validation before adoption in clinical practice. In the interim, efforts should be focused on maximizing use of the existing surveillance tools given their prevalent underuse globally. Remarkable advances have been made in the treatment of HCC, including expanded eligibility for surgical therapies, improved patient selection for locoregional treatments and increased systemic treatment options, including immune-checkpoint inhibitors. In this Review, we discuss trends in the epidemiology of HCC and their implications for screening, prevention and therapy.

Aberrant cytokine and VCAM-1 expression in patients with viral and non-viral related liver cirrhosis

The study aim was to compare the alterations in the expression levels of proinflammatory and chemotactic cytokines as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-8, the down regulatory cytokine IL-10, in addition to the vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) gene in different groups of patients with cirrhosis due to various etiologies. This case-control study included 84 patients suffering from cirrhosis of viral and non-viral etiologies and 20 sex and age-matched healthy controls. All patients were subjected to detailed history taking, clinical examination, and liver function assessment. The expression levels of TNF-α, IL-17A, IL-8, IL-10, and VCAM-1 were assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells by real-time PCR. Patients with cirrhosis showed marked changes in the tested gene expression levels relative to the control group. Higher expression levels of all genes except IL-10 were seen in patients of the viral than in the non-viral groups. Most of the significant correlations of liver function parameters were observed with TNF-α in both the viral and non-viral groups, followed by IL-17A. Increased TNF-α and IL-17A presented potential risk factors for disease progression to cirrhosis of Child class C.