Noninvasive Ventilation Group Research Articles

Respiratory support modalities in cardiogenic shock: insights from a prospective multicenter registry

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Respiratory support is a vital component of the comprehensive management of cardiogenic shock (CS). However, there is a lack of data comparing the application of different respiratory support modalities in CS patients. Purpose Aim of this study was to examine the use of low-flow oxygen (LFO), non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in a cohort of CS patients and assess their effects on 60-day mortality. Methods We analyzed a cohort of CS patients enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry from twelve cardiac intensive care units from March 2020 to August 2022. Patients were categorized according to the maximum intensity of respiratory support during intensive care unit stay into three groups: LFO, NIV, and IMV. Clinical characteristics and mortality were compared between groups. Results A total of 375 patients were included in our analysis. The median age of the population was 65 years, with 77% being males. During their ICU stay, 139 patients (37%) received LFO, 61 (16%) were treated with NIV, and 175 (47%) underwent IMV. Patients treated with IMV presented more frequently with cardiac arrest (41% vs 8% in the LFO group and 5% in the NIV group, p = 0.00). Patients treated with LFO and NIV had a higher prevalence of CS related to acute decompensated heart failure (40% and 57% vs 21% in the IMV group, p = 0.00); moreover, they presented with less severe respiratory distress, milder tissue hypoperfusion, and better SCAI class upon admission. At sixty days follow-up 128 patients (34%) died: 41% in the IMV group, 28% in the LFO group and 26% in the NIV group (p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis revealed that NIV was independently associated with improved survival (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.22-0.99, p = 0.05), while age, lactate levels, and glomerular filtration rate were predictors of mortality. A tendency towards improved survival with NIV was observed even after excluding patients with cardiac arrest. Conclusions Compared to previous registries, our study highlights a significant shift in the management of CS, marked by a growing preference for NIV. Notably, this approach, when employed in well-selected patients in the early stages of CS, correlates with lower mortality rates. These findings underscore the significance of personalized treatment strategies for CS patients, considering their clinical presentation, the degree of respiratory distress, and tissue perfusion.60-day survival curvesMultivariate regression analysis

High velocity nasal insufflation versus non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a comparative study

Background In order to treat respiratory failure, thermo-humidified nasal high flow oxygen (NHFO) therapy is being used more and more. In several clinical scenarios, NHFO has recently gained popularity as alternative noninvasive respiratory ventilation. Aim The aim is to assess the role of high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) versus noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute respiratory failure. Patients and methods This is a prospective randomized clinical study conducted on 60 patients admitted to the Chest Department at Menoufia University Hospital with acute respiratory failure. Patients were randomized to receive either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation using an oronasal mask or high-velocity nasal insufflation (initial flow was at 30-40 l/min; temperature was adjusted to 37°C; fraction of inspired oxygen 1.0) with clinical monitoring and arterial blood gas (ABG) monitoring after 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. Results The therapeutic impact of both, HVNI and NIV, on pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), hydrogen ion concentration, arterial oxygen saturation and pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) over time was almost similar. There was an improvement in dyspnea and a decrease in respiratory rate over time when compared with baseline results in both groups. There was no statistical difference between both groups. The failure rate in type I respiratory failure (RF) was 33.3% in the HVNI group and 28.6% in the NIV group (P-value 0.7). The failure rate in type II RF was 41.7% in the HVNI group and 25% in the NIV group (P-value 0.3). HVNI was more comfortable for patients and provided better communication and oral intake. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the HVNI was comparable to the NIV in the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure and could be used as a noninvasive method of ventilation alternative to the BiPAP in hypercapnic RF, with more comfortability and better communication in the HVNI group.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Associated with Noninvasive Ventilation on Physical Capacity and Quality of Life in Post-COVID-19: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blinded Clinical Trial Protocol.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) seems to be a better choice to improve physical and functional capacity after acute infection. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effects of different strategies to optimize post-acute phase rehabilitation and reduce long COVID-19 physical deteriorations. To compare the use of a noninvasive ventilation (NIV) plus aerobic exercise strategy during PR program with to a standard PR (without NIV) on physical capacity and quality of life outcomes in post-COVID-19. Double-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 100 individuals discharged from hospital in a post-acute phase of severe COVID-19 will be randomized into two groups: PR + NIV (Group 1) and PR (Group 2). Inclusion criteria include participants who present symptomatic dyspnea II and III by the modified Medical Research Council, aged 18 years or older. Both groups will receive aerobic and resistance exercise, and inspiratory muscle training. However, group 1 will perform aerobic training with bilevel NIV. Cardiopulmonary exercise test will assess the O2 peak uptake, 6-minute walk test will assess the walking distance and short-form 36 will assess the quality of life before and after 8 weeks (after 24 PR sessions). Moreover, patients will be contacted by telephone every 3 months for one year to record possible adverse events, hospitalizations, and death. All data will be registered in RedCap, and analyses will be performed in the STATA v13 software. RBR-3t9pkzt.

Prognostic analysis of high-flow nasal cannula therapy and non-invasive ventilation in mild to moderate hypoxemia patients and construction of a machine learning model for 48-h intubation prediction-a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC database.

This study aims to investigate the clinical outcome between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) therapy in mild to moderate hypoxemic patients on the first ICU day and to develop a predictive model of 48-h intubation. The study included adult patients from the MIMIC III and IV databases who first initiated HFNC or NIV therapy due to mild to moderate hypoxemia (100 < PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300). The 48-h and 30-day intubation rates were compared using cross-sectional and survival analysis. Nine machine learning and six ensemble algorithms were deployed to construct the 48-h intubation predictive models, of which the optimal model was determined by its prediction accuracy. The top 10 risk and protective factors were identified using the Shapley interpretation algorithm. A total of 123,042 patients were screened, of which, 673 were from the MIMIC IV database for ventilation therapy comparison (HFNC n = 363, NIV n = 310) and 48-h intubation predictive model construction (training dataset n = 471, internal validation set n = 202) and 408 were from the MIMIC III database for external validation. The NIV group had a lower intubation rate (23.1% vs. 16.1%, p = 0.001), ICU 28-day mortality (18.5% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.014), and in-hospital mortality (19.6% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.007) compared to the HFNC group. Survival analysis showed that the total and 48-h intubation rates were not significantly different. The ensemble AdaBoost decision tree model (internal and external validation set AUROC 0.878, 0.726) had the best predictive accuracy performance. The model Shapley algorithm showed Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), acute physiology scores (APSIII), the minimum and maximum lactate value as risk factors for early failure and age, the maximum PaCO2 and PH value, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), the minimum PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and PaO2 value as protective factors. NIV was associated with lower intubation rate and ICU 28-day and in-hospital mortality. Further survival analysis reinforced that the effect of NIV on the intubation rate might partly be attributed to the other impact factors. The ensemble AdaBoost decision tree model may assist clinicians in making clinical decisions, and early organ function support to improve patients' SOFA, APSIII, GCS, PaCO2, PaO2, PH, PaO2/FiO2 ratio, and lactate values can reduce the early failure rate and improve patient prognosis.

High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus noninvasive ventilation for the management of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Whether high-flow nasal oxygen can improve clinical signs of acute respiratory failure in acute heart failure (AHF) is uncertain. To compare the effect of high-flow oxygen with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) on respiratory rate in patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) for AHF-related acute respiratory failure. Multicenter, randomized pilot study in three French EDs. Adult patients with acute respiratory failure due to suspected AHF were included. Key exclusion criteria were urgent need for intubation, Glasgow Coma Scale <13 points or hemodynamic instability. Patients were randomly assigned to receive high-flow oxygen (minimum 50 l/min) or noninvasive bilevel positive pressure ventilation. The primary outcome was change in respiratory rate within the first hour of treatment and was analyzed with a linear mixed model. Secondary outcomes included changes in pulse oximetry, heart rate, blood pressure, blood gas samples, comfort, treatment failure and mortality. Among the 145 eligible patients in the three participating centers, 60 patients were included in the analysis [median age 86 (interquartile range (IQR), 90; 92) years]. There was a median respiratory rate of 30.5 (IQR, 28; 33) and 29.5 (IQR, 27; 35) breaths/min in the high-flow oxygen and NIV groups respectively, with a median change of -10 (IQR, -12; -8) with high-flow nasal oxygen and -7 (IQR, -11; -5) breaths/min with NIV [estimated difference -2.6 breaths/min (95% confidence interval (CI), -0.5-5.7), P = 0.052] at 60 min. There was a median SpO2 of 95 (IQR, 92; 97) and 96 (IQR, 93; 97) in the high-flow oxygen and NIV groups respectively, with a median change at 60 min of 2 (IQR, 0; 5) with high-flow nasal oxygen and 2 (IQR, -1; 5) % with NIV [estimated difference 0.8% (95% CI, -1.1-2.8), P = 0.60]. PaO2, PaCO2 and pH did not differ at 1 h between groups, nor did treatment failure, intubation and mortality rates. In this pilot study, we did not observe a statistically significant difference in changes in respiratory rate among patients with acute respiratory failure due to AHF and managed with high-flow oxygen or NIV. However, the point estimate and its large confidence interval may suggest a benefit of high-flow oxygen. NCT04971213 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).

Sequential Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Diabetic Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Acute respiratory failure is the most common clinical feature in patients with severe Coronavirus Disease -2019 (COVID-19) who are admitted to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and may require invasive mechanical ventilation, which is generally linked with a high fatality rate. Patients with established co-morbidities, such as diabetes, invariably fall into the category of patients with severe disease presentation and rapid disease progression. Aim: To study the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 diabetic patients after sequential oxygen therapy using a reservoir bag mask, High Frequency Nasal Oxygen (HFNO), and Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV). Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adhering to the STROBE statement criteria, the authors included 150 patients suffering from COVID-19 acute respiratory failure, who were known diabetics, divided into three groups based on admission oxygen saturation and Respiratory Rate (RR) for Non-Rebreather Bag-Mask (NRBM) therapy, HFNO, and NIV. For two weeks, all patients were monitored, and measures such as Saturation of peripheral Oxygen (SpO2 ), Respiratory Rate (RR) escalation of oxygen requirement, glycaemic management, compliance and problems with continued oxygen therapy, the need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and mortality were recorded. The recorded parameters among the three groups were compared using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test. Results: Among the demographic parameters recorded, the authors noted that individuals older than 50-55 years of either sex were admitted for HFNO (56.02±11.71 years) and NIV (54.28±14.67 years) therapy, whereas no such preponderance was noted among the two genders. Significant results were noted in all three groups in terms of the escalation of oxygen fraction (FiO2) requirements on the 10th day of observation (NRBM 12.63±2.48%, HFNO 37.74±13.56%, NIV 82.44±11.11%). The need for tracheal intubation was higher in patients in the NIV group (10) compared to the HFNO (9) and NRBM (1) groups. Patients whose blood sugar levels remained uncontrolled throughout the course of observation in the study were disparagingly seen to have been a part of the HFNO and NIV groups, and hence the subsequent mortality. Conclusion: There was a steady escalation of mean oxygen requirements in all three groups of oxygen therapy over the course of two weeks, coinciding with the ensuing ‘cytokine storm’ associated with Severe Acute Respiratory SyndromeCoronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This trend of escalation of oxygen requirement also in turn coincided with the raised glycaemic charting trends of the patients over the same course of two weeks, delineating those individuals with diabetes mellitus, in view of their compromised immunity and innate pro -inflammatory state, are more prone to develop severe form of the disease with more serious complications, which may even lead to mortality. With regards to the compliance, NRBM &amp; HFNO provided best results in comparison to NIV. The rates of complications were also noted to be higher with the use of NIV in this instance.

A comprehensive physical functional assessment of survivors of critical care unit stay due to COVID-19.

To examine the physical function and respiratory muscle strength of patients - who recovered from critical COVID-19 - after intensive care unit discharge to the ward on Days one (D1) and seven (D7), and to investigate variables associated with functional impairment. This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients with COVID-19 who needed invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula and were discharged from the intensive care unit to the ward. Participants were submitted to Medical Research Council sum-score, handgrip strength, maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and short physical performance battery tests. Participants were grouped into two groups according to their need for invasive ventilation: the Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (IMV Group) and the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group (Non-IMV Group). Patients in the IMV Group (n = 31) were younger and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores than those in the Non-IMV Group (n = 33). The short physical performance battery scores (range 0 - 12) on D1 and D7 were 6.1 ± 4.3 and 7.3 ± 3.8, respectively for the Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Group, and 1.3 ± 2.5 and 2.6 ± 3.7, respectively for the IMV Group. The prevalence of intensive care unit-acquired weakness on D7 was 13% for the Non-IMV Group and 72% for the IMV Group. The maximal inspiratory pressure, maximal expiratory pressure, and handgrip strength increased on D7 in both groups, but the maximal expiratory pressure and handgrip strength were still weak. Only maximal inspiratory pressure was recovered (i.e., > 80% of the predicted value) in the Non-IMV Group. Female sex, and the need and duration of invasive mechanical were independently and negatively associated with the short physical performance battery score and handgrip strength. Patients who recovered from critical COVID-19 and who received invasive mechanical ventilation presented greater disability than those who were not invasively ventilated. However, they both showed marginal functional improvement during early recovery, regardless of the need for invasive mechanical ventilation. This might highlight the severity of disability caused by SARS-CoV-2.

Mekanik ventilasyon modlarının prematüre bebeklerin tükürük kortizol düzeylerine etkisi

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between mechanical ventilation modes and stress levels by measuring salivary cortisol levels in preterm infants.&#x0D; Materials and Methods: The study group comprised 65 preterm infants on respiratory support and 43 control preterm infants. The Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS) was used to evaluate pain. To determine the stress level, salivary cortisol levels were studied in saliva samples taken in the morning and evening on the 4th postnatal day.&#x0D; Results: In the study group, morning and evening cortisol levels of the infants were measured 8.33±5.7 ng/ml and 8.05±5.6 ng/ml, respectively. In the control group, morning and evening cortisol values of the infants were measured 1.50±0.7 ng/ml and 1.48±0.7 ng/ml, respectively. The morning and evening salivary cortisol levels of the infants in the study group were significantly higher than those of the infants in the control group. In the invasive mechanical ventilation group infants, morning and evening cortisol levels of the infants were measured 12.46±5,3 ng/ml and 12.0±5,2 ng/ml, respectively. In the non-invasive mechanical ventilation group, morning and evening cortisol values were measured 4.57±2.7 ng/ml and 4.41±2.7 ng/ml, respectively. Both morning and evening salivary cortisol levels of infants on invasive mechanical ventilation were higher than those of infants on non-invasive mechanical ventilation. &#x0D; Conclusion: Increased salivary cortisol levels in invasive modes indicate that intubation causes pain and stress in newborns.

Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) Oxygen Therapy and Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) in Patients with COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: With the expansion of the COVID-19, the study of different oxygen therapy methods has yielded different results. In the current study, we compare the effects of non-invasive ventilation and oxygen therapy through the high-flow nasal cannula.&#x0D; Methods: Non-intensive care unit-admitted COVID-19 patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group received oxygen therapy with High Flow Nasal Cannula (HFNC) and the second group received Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV). Clinical conditions and results obtained from laboratory tests were compared in two groups before oxygen therapy, and after 24 and 48 hr.&#x0D; Results: The average age of the participants was 56.25. According to the results, after 24 hr of respiratory intervention, dyspnea was the most frequent in the NIV group with 83.33% and in the HFNC group with 90%. After 48 hr, in the NIV group, nasal flaring was observed with a frequency of 60%, and in the HFNC group, weakness and lethargy were the most common symptoms (56.66%). Comparison of clinical status and laboratory indices of the two groups of patients showed that most of the indices in patients in three time periods were not significantly different, while the results demonstrated that after 24 hours, the mean PaCo2 in the HFNC group was significantly lower than the NIV group (0.002) and the mean PH in the HFNC group was significantly higher than the other group (p=0.039).&#x0D; Conclusion: The effectiveness of using HFNC compared to NIV is the same and shows no significant difference.&#x0D;

Efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula in patients with acute heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAcute heart failure (AHF) is often associated with diffuse insufficiency and arterial hypoxemia, requiring respiratory support for rapid and effective correction. We aimed to compare the effects of high-flow nasal cannula(HFNC) with those of conventional oxygen therapy(COT) or non-invasive ventilation(NIV) on the prognosis of patients with AHF.MethodsWe performed the search using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases from the inception to August 31, 2023 for relevant studies in English and Chinese. We included controlled studies comparing HFNC with COT or NIV in patients with AHF. Primary outcomes included the intubation rate, respiratory rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and oxygenation status.ResultsFrom the 1288 original papers identified, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria, and 1333 patients were included. Compared with COT, HFNC reduced the intubation rate (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.14–0.58, P = 0.0005), RR (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.73 95% CI: -0.99 – -0.47, P < 0.00001) and HR (SMD: -0.88, 95% CI: -1.07 – -0.69, P < 0.00001), and hospital stay (SMD: -0.94, 95% CI: -1.76 – -0.12, P = 0.03), and increase arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), (SMD: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.70–1.06, P < 0.00001) and oxygen saturation (SpO2 [%], SMD: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.34–1.06, P = 0.0001).ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in intubation rate, RR, HR, arterial blood gas parameters, and dyspnea scores between the HFNC and NIV groups. Compared with COT, HFNC effectively reduced the intubation rate and provided greater clinical benefits to patients with AHF. However, there was no significant difference in the clinical prognosis of patients with AHF between the HFNC and NIV groups.Trial registrationPROSPERO (identifier: CRD42022365611).

Efficacy of different respiratory supports to prevent hypoxia during flexible bronchoscopy in patients of COPD: a triple-arm, randomised controlled trial

BackgroundPatients with chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease (COPD) undergo bronchoscopy for various reasons, and are at relatively higher risk of complications. This study evaluated the efficacy of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow-oxygen-therapy (HFOT) compared...

Adding Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation to Supplemental Oxygen During Exercise Training in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is currently the fourth leading cause of death in the world. Pulmonary rehabilitation is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training and supplemental oxygen during exercise training during pulmonary rehabilitation practice in comparison with only exercise training on lung functions, blood gases, lactate levels, respiratory muscle pressures, dyspnea, walking distances, quality of life, and depression in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The main outcome measure is exercise capacity (6-minute walk test), and the secondary end-point included quality of life. Thirty-five patients (mean ± SD age, 65.4 ± 6.5 years) with a mean bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration of 39.4 ± 7%, undergoing an 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation, were randomized to either non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training, supplemental oxygen during exercise training, or exercise training groups. The improvements in respiratory muscle strength were higher in non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training patients than the moderate improvements in the exercise training group. Both non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training and supplemental oxygen during exercise training groups showed significant increases in the 6-minute walk test and incremental shuttle walk test. However, the increase in walking distance was better in non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training group (69.8 ± 53.2 m in 6-minute walk test and 66.6 ± 65.2 m in incremental shuttle walk test, P = .001 and P = .005, respectively) compared to supplemental oxygen during exercise training group (42.5+55.5 m in 6-minute walk test and 53.5+70.2 m in incremental shuttle walk test, P = .01 each, respectively). The total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score was similar in all study groups after the intervention. Symptoms of depression significantly improved only in non-invasive ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and exercise training group (-2.8+2.8, P = .006). Non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIPPV) added to supplemental oxygen during exercise training was associated with better physiological adaptations than other modalities.

Non-Invasive Ventilation Reduces Postoperative Respiratory Failure in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Postoperative non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has been proposed as an attractive strategy to reduce morbidity in obese subjects undergoing general anaesthesia. The increased body mass index (BMI) correlates with loss of perioperative functional residual capacity, expiratory reserve volume, and total lung capacity. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy of NIV in a post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) in reducing post-extubation acute respiratory failure (ARF) after biliointestinal bypass (BIBP) in obese patients. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted from January 2019 to December 2020 to compare acute respiratory failure within the first 72 postoperative hours and oximetry values of obese patients who underwent BIBP after postoperative NIV adoption or conventional Venturi mask. Results: In total, 50 patients who received NIV postoperative protocol and 57 patients who received conventional Venturi mask ventilation were included in the study. After 120 min in PACU pH, pCO2, pO2, and SpO2 were better in the NIV group vs. control group (p < 0.001). Seventy-two hours postoperatively, one patient (2%) in the NIV group vs. seven patients (12.2%) in the control group developed acute respiratory failure. Therefore, conventional Venturi mask ventilation resulted in being significantly associated (p < 0.05) with postoperative ARF with an RR of 0.51 (IC 0.27-0.96). Conclusions: After bariatric surgery, short-term NIV during PACU observation promotes a more rapid recovery of postoperative lung function and oxygenation in obese patients, reducing the necessity for critical care in the days following surgery. Therefore, as day-case surgery becomes more advocated even for morbid obesity, it might be considered a necessary procedure.

Nalmefene combined noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease coupled with type II respiratory failure: A meta-analysis.

Nalmefene is an opioid system modulator with antagonist activity at the μ and δ receptors and partial agonist activity at the κ receptor. Previous studies have suggested that nalmefene could improve respiratory function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is no comprehensive systematic review published regarding the clinical efficacy of nalmefene. We explored the following electronic bibliographic databases: EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, Wanfang, and Chinese national knowledge infrastructure. To collect data from randomized controlled trials on the therapy of COPD coupled with type II respiratory failure and nalmefene + noninvasive ventilator treatment. The retrieved articles were screened to determine the final inclusion criteria and to extract relevant data, such as the clinical efficacy rate, pulmonary function, blood gas analysis, and adverse reactions. In our study, we used relative risk and weighted mean deviation, as well as a 95% confidence interval for describing nalmefene effectiveness and safety while treating COPD with type II respiratory failure. The outcomes of the meta-analysis demonstrated that the clinical efficacy rate of the nalmefene + noninvasive ventilation group was higher than that of the naloxone + noninvasive ventilation and noninvasive ventilation groups. Moreover, the improvement indices of pH value, partial pressure and saturation of blood oxygen, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and pulmonary function of the nalmefene + noninvasive ventilation group were better than those of the noninvasive ventilation group, and there was no increase in the occurrence of adverse drug reactions. Nalmefene combined with noninvasive ventilation can significantly improve the blood gas index and lung function in patients with COPD combined with type II respiratory failure.

Effect of high-flow nasal cannula versus non-invasive ventilation after extubation on successful extubation in obese patients: a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

BackgroundThe pathophysiological characteristics of the respiratory system of obese patients differ from those of non-obese patients. Few studies have evaluated the effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation...

Post-extubation high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy versus non-invasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with hypercapnic respiratory failure.

The sequential use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for weaning in hypercapnic respiratory failure patients is a recommended practice. However, the effectiveness of weaning on High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is unclear. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with hypercapnic respiratory failure who received invasive ventilation were screened for enrolment. This study was a single-centre, prospective, randomized comparative study. The primary outcome was treatment failure within 72 hours after extubation. Patients who were screened positive for extubation were enrolled in the study and randomized into the HFNC group and NIV group using a computer-generated simple randomization chart. The treatment failure was defined as a return to invasive mechanical ventilation, or a switch in respiratory support modality (i.e., changing from HFNC to NIV or from NIV to HFNC). Of 72 patients, 62 patients were included in the study. Treatment failure occurred in 8 patients (26.67 %) in HFNC group and 8 patients in NIV group (25%) (p=0.881). The mean duration of ICU stay in HFNC group was 5.47±2.26 days and 6.56±3.39 in NIV group (p=0.376). In the current study, HFNC was non-inferior to NIV in preventing post-extubation respiratory failure in COPD patients, while HFNC had better treatment tolerance.

High-Flow Nasal Oxygen versus Noninvasive Ventilation in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can be used in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but the effect of HFNC on clinical outcomes in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) is still uncertain. We searched electronic literature databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HFNC with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in hypercapnic patients with AECOPD. The primary endpoint of this meta-analysis was PaCO2, PaO2, and SpO2. The secondary outcomes were the respiratory rate, mortality, complications, and intubation rate. We included 7 RCTs with a total of 481 patients. There were no significant differences on measures of PaCO2 (MD = -0.42, 95%CI -3.60 to 2.75, Z = 0.26, and P = 0.79), PaO2 (MD = -1.36, 95%CI -4.69 to 1.97, Z = 0.80, and P = 0.42), and SpO2 (MD = -0.78, 95%CI -1.67 to 0.11, Z = 1.72, P = 0.08) between the HFNC group and the NIV group. There was no significant difference in measures of the mortality and intubation rate between the HFNC group (OR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.69, Z = 0.76, and P = 0.44) and the NIV group (OR = 2.38, 95%CI 0.49 to 11.50, Z = 1.08, and P = 0.28), respectively. But the respiratory rate in the HFNC group was lower than that in the NIV group (MD = -1.13, 95%CI -2.13 to -0.14, Z = 2.23, and P = 0.03), and fewer complications were found in the HFNC group (OR = 0.26, 95%CI 0.14 to 0.47, Z = 4.46, and P < 0.00001). NIV was noninferior to HFNC in decreasing PaCO2 and increasing PaO2 and SpO2. Similarly, the mortality and intubation rate was similar among the two groups. The respiratory rate and complications were inferior in the AECOPD group treated with HFNC.

A Randomised Comparative Study of High-Flow Oxygen Through Nasal Cannula and Non-invasive Ventilation in Patients with Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Introduction: Type 1 or acute hypoxemic respiratory failure(AHRF) is a condition of hypoxemia (PaO2&lt;60 mm of Hg)– insufficient enough to meet the metabolism of the body– thereby requiring ICU admission and use of adequateventilatory support. Studies have not yet been able to confirmwhich out of the high-flow oxygen through nasal cannula(HFNC) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is better in managingsuch patients. To compare efficacy and outcome of HFNC andNIV in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.Materials and Methods: This randomized comparative studyconducted at Critical Care Unit, SRMSIMS, Bareilly fromFebruary 2021 to August 2022, included 99 patients with AHRF(≥ 18 years) randomized to either those who received HFNC(n = 41) or those who received NIV (n = 58). The demographiccharacteristics were noted. The hemodynamic parameters werenoted at baseline, 1 to 2, 12 and 24 hours. The outcomes wereduration of treatment and mortality rate.Results: Compared to NIV group, Mean ± SD of FiO2 (%) atbaseline, 1 to 2, at 6, at 12, and 24 hours in HFNC was 97.46± 0.5, 93.05 ± 3.01, 82.49 ± 3.25, 74.78 ± 3.32, 58.83 ± 5.62respectively, which was significantly lower as compared toNIV (100 ± 0, 94.4 ± 2.11, 83.78 ± 2.88, 76.28 ± 2.93, 60.43 ±3.95, p&lt;0.05). Median (25th–75th percentile) of PaO2/FiO2 atbaseline, at 1 to 2 hours, at 12 hours, at 24 hours in HFNC was156 (153–165), 195 (190–202), 237 (233–242), 266 (260–277)respectively which was significantly lower as compared toNIV 164.5 (157–174), 201.5 (191.25–215), 241 (235.25–245),277.5(262.25–288), respectively (p&lt;0.05). HFNC group had asignificantly lower mean duration of respiratory support (2.37± 1.09 vs. 3.9 ± 2.03 days, P = 0.0002). Total 9 (21.95%) casesexpired in HFNC group as compared to 17 (29.31%) cases inNIV group (p = 0.412).Conclusion: To conclude, the treatment with non-invasiveventilation was better than high-flow nasal oxygen in patients ofAHRF and led to better maintenance of respiratory parameters.Overall, in terms of outcome, both interventions had similarmortality rates. Future studies should be conducted on largerset of the population for verifying the data for providing betteroutcomes to the patients.

Noninvasive Ventilation for Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Experience From the 2016/2017 Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Incidence and Epidemiology Prospective Cohort Study.

The worldwide practice and impact of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is unknown. We sought to describe NIV use and associated clinical outcomes in PARDS. Planned ancillary study to the 2016/2017 prospective Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Incidence and Epidemiology study. One hundred five international PICUs. Patients with newly diagnosed PARDS admitted during 10 study weeks. None. Children were categorized by their respiratory support at PARDS diagnosis into NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) groups. Of 708 subjects with PARDS, 160 patients (23%) received NIV at PARDS diagnosis (NIV group). NIV failure rate (defined as tracheal intubation or death) was 84 of 160 patients (53%). Higher nonrespiratory pediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD-2) score, Pa o2 /F io2 was less than 100 at PARDS diagnosis, immunosuppression, and male sex were independently associated with NIV failure. NIV failure was 100% among patients with nonrespiratory PELOD-2 score greater than 2, Pa o2 /F io2 less than 100, and immunosuppression all present. Among patients with Pa o2 /F io2 greater than 100, children in the NIV group had shorter total duration of NIV and IMV, than the IMV at initial diagnosis group. We failed to identify associations between NIV use and PICU survival in a multivariable Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 1.04 [95% CI, 0.61-1.80]) or mortality in a propensity score matched analysis ( p = 0.369). Use of NIV at PARDS diagnosis was associated with shorter exposure to IMV in children with mild to moderate hypoxemia. Even though risk of NIV failure was high in some children, we failed to identify greater hazard of mortality in these patients.

Timing of bronchoscopy and application of scoring tools in children with severe pneumonia

BackgroundThere is still a lack of effective scoring criteria for assessing the severity of pulmonary infection associated with changes in the endobronchial lining of the bronchus in children. This study aimed to ascertain the timing and value of endoscopic scoring of fibreoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in children with severe pneumonia.MethodThe clinical data of 229 children with severe pneumonia treated with BAL in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University between November 2018 and December 2021 were collected. According to the severity of the disease, patients were divided into an invasive ventilation group and a non-invasive ventilation group, as well as an early BAL group (receiving BAL within 1 day of admission) and a late BAL group (receiving BAL 2 days after admission). A Student’s t-test, Chi-square test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and survival curve were used to analyse the bronchitis score, aetiology of BAL fluid and survival data.ResultsThe scores of endoscopic mucosal oedema, erythema and pallor and the total score in the invasive ventilation group were higher than those in the non-invasive ventilation group (P < 0.05), and they were consistent with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. The secretion colour score was lower in the early BAL group than in the late BAL group (P < 0.05). On the bronchitis scores, which were evaluated using a ROC curve, the difference in the mucosal erythema, pallor, oedema and total score of the invasive and non-invasive groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05), which was consistent with the area under the ROC of the SOFA scores. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Assessment II and SOFA scores after FOB were lower than those before treatment (P < 0.05). In terms of ICU hospitalisation days and total hospitalisation days, the time of the early FOB patients was shorter than that of the late FOB patients (P < 0.05). A total of 22 patients (9.61%) died. The Kaplan–Meier analysis and log-rank test showed that the survival rate of the non-invasive ventilation group was higher than that of the invasive ventilation group (P < 0.05).ConclusionThis study found that FOB combined with BAL is an important method for the diagnosis and treatment of severe pneumonia. Early BAL can reduce hospitalisation and ICU time; however, it cannot improve the survival rate. The endoscopic score has a certain role to play in assessing the severity of pulmonary inflammation, but studies with a large sample are still needed to confirm this.