Nonfatal Firearm Research Articles

Using EMS data to explore community-level factors associated with firearm violence in North Carolina

BackgroundFirearm violence is a significant public health issue. However, it is unclear if there is an association between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) and the intent of both fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries, and if these associations are modified by community race and ethnic composition. This study examines the association between community-level social vulnerability and firearm injury incidence in North Carolina (NC) using 2021–2022 emergency medical services (EMS) data. Additionally, it investigates how these associations vary by the intent of injury (assault, self-inflicted, and unintentional), and whether they are modified by community racial/ethnic composition.MethodsThis cross-sectional study utilized NC EMS data, capturing firearm incidents from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2022. The SVI from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was used to assess community-level vulnerability. The SVI’s racial/ethnic minority status component was removed for stratification analysis. Firearm injury rates were calculated per 100,000 population, and negative binomial regression models were used to estimate Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs) for different SVI levels and intents of firearm injuries.ResultsDuring the study period, we identified 7,250 EMS encounters at non-healthcare locations related to firearm injuries, encompassing 2,648 NC census tracts. Assault was the leading cause of firearm injuries (n = 3,799), followed by self-inflicted (n = 1,498), and unintentional injuries (n = 722). High-SVI communities had significantly higher rates of firearm injuries compared to low-SVI communities, particularly for assault-related injuries. When the minority status component was excluded from SVI, racial/ethnic minority status emerged as a significant modifier, with higher rates of firearm injuries being observed in communities with larger racial/ethnic minority populations.ConclusionCommunity-level social vulnerability is significantly associated with firearm injury incidence, with the effect being more pronounced in racial/ethnic minority communities. These findings underscore the need for targeted public health interventions that address underlying social determinants of health (e.g., access to education) to reduce firearm violence. Future research should further explore the intersection of social vulnerability and racial/ethnic composition to develop effective prevention strategies.

Nonfatal Firearm Injury & Subsequent Emergency Department Utilization Among Non-Elderly Adults

IntroductionThe mortality, long-term morbidity, and exacerbated healthcare needs due to firearm injury in the US are significant and growing. However, the relationship between exposure to a nonfatal firearm injury and long-term ED utilization is poorly understood. This study estimates the association between exposure to a nonfatal firearm injury and ED utilization in the subsequent year. MethodsUsing all-payer ED data among non-elderly adults in Georgia and New York, all ED visits for nonfatal firearm injuries from 2017-2018 were identified. Sociodemographic, clinical, and contextual characteristics between nonfatal firearm injury ED patients and the broader population of ED users were compared. ED utilization in the year following a nonfatal firearm injury relative to ED use in the year before, and compared to ED use by a propensity score matched control group was examined, using Poisson and negative binomial multivariable regressions. Analyses were performed in 2024. ResultsNonfatal firearm injury ED patients were disproportionately male, younger, non-Hispanic Black, uninsured, and residents of areas with low median income and high firearm ownership. Compared to a matched control group, multivariable analyses indicated that nonfatal firearm injury ED patients had significantly higher risks of having hospital admissions through the ED (aRR: 1.42), all-cause injury-related ED visits (aRR: 1.47), non-firearm injury-related ED visits (aRR: 1.26), and additional nonfatal firearm injury-related ED visits (aRR: 325.45) in the subsequent year (p<0.001 for all). About one in every eight ED users with a firearm-related injury at index also sought ED care for another nonfatal firearm injury within one year. ConclusionsNonfatal firearm-related injuries contribute to preventable harm, health inequity and increased ED utilization.

Linking Data on Nonfatal Firearm Injuries in Youths to Assess Disease Burden

This cross-sectional study estimates the incidence of nonfatal firearm injuries among children and young adults after linking patient-level police and trauma registry data.

Factors Associated With Recurrent Pediatric Firearm Injury : A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Firearm injuries are the leading cause of death among children aged 0 to 17 years in the United States. To examine the factors associated with recurrent firearm injury among children who presented with acute (index) nonfatal firearm injury in the St. Louis region. Multicenter, observational, cohort study. 2 adult and 2 pediatric level I trauma hospitals in St. Louis, Missouri. Pediatric patients aged 0 to 17 years presenting with an index firearm injury between 2010 and 2019. From the St. Louis Region-Wide Hospital-Based Violence Intervention Program Data Repository, we collected data on firearm-injured patient demographics, hospital and diagnostic information, health insurance status, and mortality. The Social Vulnerability Index was used to characterize the social vulnerability of the census tracts of patients' residences. Analysis included descriptive statistics and time-to-event analyses estimating the cumulative incidence of experiencing a recurrent firearm injury. During the 10-year study period, 1340 children presented with an index firearm injury. Most patients were Black (87%), non-Hispanic (99%), male (84%), and between the ages of 15 and 17 years (67%). The estimated risk for firearm reinjury was 6% at 1 year and 14% at 5 years after initial injury. Male children and those seen at an adult hospital were at increased risk for reinjury. Our data set does not account for injuries occurring outside of the study period and for reinjuries presenting to nonstudy hospitals. Children who experience an initial firearm injury are at high risk for experiencing a recurrent firearm injury. Interventions are needed to reduce reinjury and address inequities in the demographic and clinical profiles within this cohort of children. National Institutes of Health.

B - 53 Neuropsychological Functioning after a Bi-Parietal Penetrating Traumatic Brain Injury in a 28-Year-Old Hispanic Male

Abstract Objective In the U.S. there are approximately 115,000 non-fatal firearm injuries each year, resulting in an annual cost of over $229 billion. Of these injuries, some result in penetrating brain injuries where an object enters and lodges within the cranial cavity, with the severity of damage determined by the shape, mass, and energy released of the projectile as it passes through the brain. This case follows a 28-year-old right-handed Hispanic male with no premorbid medical history, 16 years of education, who experienced bi-parietal lesions as a result of a gunshot wound to the head one year prior. This trajectory is rare, with little literature detailing the effects of penetrating injuries to both parietal lobes. Method The gunshot wound resulted in a bullet trajectory from the left frontoparietal region to the right parietal calvarium with multiple displaced ballistic fragments. Since the injury, he presented with resolving right-sided weakness and sensory changes, reduced balance, memory complaints, and bilateral parietally mediated findings. Results Neuropsychological testing showed right-sided suppression (tactile, auditory, and visual in the lower quadrant), reduced sensation in his right hand, alexia with agraphia, acquired apraxia of speech without aphasia, Gerstmann’s Syndrome, topographical disorientation, visuospatial dysgnosia, and constructional apraxia. There was also indication of inattentiveness, memory impairments, and processing speed deficits. Conclusions The present case study delineates the neuropsychological sequalae after a penetrating brain injury to the right parietal lobe and left frontoparietal region, resulting in significant cognitive deficits consistent with pronounced bilateral parietal lobe findings.

Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm Injury Rates by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2019 to 2020.

Racial disparities in firearm injury death in the United States are well established. Less is known about the magnitude of nonfatal and total firearm injury. To combine health care data with death certificate data to estimate total firearm injuries in various racial and ethnic groups. Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Fatal injury data were collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Data on nonfatal injuries were collected from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), a 20% stratified sample of U.S. emergency department visits, weighted to provide national estimates for the United States, 2019 to 2020. All firearm injuries and deaths in the United States. Race and ethnicity were classified into 5 mutually exclusive categories: Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and White. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes were used to classify firearm injury intent. Incidence of fatal and nonfatal injury in the U.S. population and case-fatality ratios (CFRs). There were 252 376 total firearm injuries, including 84 908 deaths from firearm injures. Of all firearm injuries, 37.8% were unintentional, 37.3% were assault related, 21.0% were self-harm, and 1.3% were law enforcement associated. Self-harm had the highest CFRs (90.9% overall). Unintentional injuries accounted for just 1021 (1.2%) deaths but 94 433 (56.4%) of nonfatal injuries. Rates of self-harm were highest among White persons (11.0 per 100 000 population in 2020) followed by Native Americans (8.6 per 100 000). Rates of assault were highest among Black persons (70.1 per 100 000), as were unintentional injuries (56.1 per 100 000). Findings are limited by the accuracy of discharge coding in NEDS, particularly regarding injury intent and patient race and ethnicity. From 2019 to 2020, the total burden of firearm injuries amounts to an average of 1 injury every 4 minutes and 1 death every 12 minutes in the United States. Racial disparities in firearm injury death are mirrored in nonfatal injury. None.

Socioeconomic disparities based on shooting intent in pediatric firearm injury.

Pediatric firearm injury is often associated with socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods. Most studies only include fatal injuries and do not differentiate by shooting intent. We hypothesized that differences in neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage would be observed among shooting intents of fatal and nonfatal cases. A linked integrated database of pediatric fatal and nonfatal firearm injuries was developed from trauma center and medical examiner records in Harris County, Texas (2018-2020). Geospatial analysis was utilized to map victim residence locations, stratified by shooting intent. Area Deprivation Index (ADI), a composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage at the census tract level was linked to shooting intent. Differences in high ADI (more deprived) versus low ADI among the shooting intents were assessed. Unadjusted and adjusted regression models assessed differences in ADI scores across shooting intent, adjusted models controlled for age, gender, and race/ethnicity. Of 324 pediatric firearm injuries, 28% were fatal; 77% were classified as interpersonal violence, 15% unintentional, and 8% self-harm. Differences were noted among shooting intent across the ADI quartiles; with increases in ADI score, the odds of interpersonal violence injuries compared with self-harm injuries significantly increased by 5%; however, when adjusting for individual-level variables of age, gender, and race and ethnicity, no significant differences in ADI were noted. Our results suggest that children living in disadvantaged neighborhoods are more likely to be affected by interpersonal firearm violence compared with self-harm; however, when differences in race/ethnicity are considered, the differences attributable to neighborhood-level disadvantage disappeared. Resources should be dedicated to improving structural aspects of neighborhood disadvantage, which disproportionately impact racial/ethnic minoritized populations. Furthermore, firearm self-harm injuries occurred among children living in the less disadvantaged neighborhoods. Understanding the associations among individual and neighborhood-level factors are important for developing streamlined injury prevention interventions by shooting intent. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Firearm injury hospitalizations and handgun purchaser licensing laws: longitudinal evaluation of state-level purchaser licensure requirements on firearm violence, 2000–2016

BackgroundHandgun purchaser licensing (HPL) laws mandate individuals to obtain a license from law enforcement before buying a firearm. Research indicates these laws effectively reduce various forms of fatal firearm violence, including homicides, suicides, and mass shootings. Our study sought to assess the impact of HPL laws on non-fatal firearm violence.MethodsUtilizing the augmented synthetic control method (ASCM), we estimated the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) resulting from a full repeal of an HPL law in Missouri (2007), a partial repeal in Michigan (2012), and an adoption on HPL law in Maryland (2013) on firearm injury hospitalizations. We utilized RAND's healthcare cost and utilization project-based dataset from 2000 to 2016 for our outcome variable. We conducted in-time placebo testing and leave-one-out donor pool testing as sensitivity analyses.ResultsMaryland’s adoption was associated with a statistically significant 32.3% reduction in firearm-related injury hospitalization (FIH) rates (ATT = − 0.497, standard error (SE) = 0.123); Missouri’s repeal was associated with a statistically significant 35.7% increase in FIH rates (ASCM = 0.456, SE = 0.155); and Michigan’s partial repeal showed no statistically significant associations with FIH rates (ATT = − 0.074, SE = 0.129). Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the estimated HPL effects.DiscussionHPL laws appear to be protective against hospitalizations for nonfatal firearm injuries. These findings align with prior research indicating that HPL laws are effective in reducing fatal firearm violence. States without such licensing systems ought to consider these robust policies as a means to address firearm violence.

Trapped in Violence: A Life Table Analysis of Firearm Injury and Death Among Adolescent Black Males

PurposeWe report the chances of 14-year-old males becoming victims of firearm injury or death before age 25 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. MethodsUsing life table methods, we followed 4,501 Black males aged 14 years, and a comparison group of 1,751 White males, over 11 years. ResultsAmong 14-year-old Black males, the risk of a nonfatal firearm injury before age 25 was 10.1% (95% confidence interval, 9.2%–11.0%), the risk of death from firearms was 2.5% (1.7%–3.2%), and the combined risk was 12.5% (11.0%–14.1%). Among White males, the risk of nonfatal firearm injury was 0.8% (0.3%–1.2%), the risk of death was 0.3% (0.02%–0.5%), and the combined risk was 1.0% (0.5%–1.5%). DiscussionRisk estimates reveal the dire likelihood of firearm injury or death among Black adolescent males in Philadelphia. Immediate interventions are needed to de-escalate conflicts, provide supports, and address the upstream causes of violence like poverty and structural racism.

Evaluating Firearm Violence After New Jersey’s Cash Bail Reform

Reducing the pretrial detention population has been a cornerstone of movements to end mass incarceration. Across many US cities, there are ongoing public debates on policies that would end pretrial detention due to the inability to afford bail, with some raising concerns that doing so would increase community violence. To evaluate changes in firearm violence after New Jersey's 2017 bail reform policy that eliminated financial barriers to avoiding pretrial detention. This case-control study used synthetic control methods to examine changes in firearm mortality and combined fatal and nonfatal shootings in New Jersey (2014-2019). New Jersey was chosen because it was one of the first states to systematically implement cash bail reform. Outcomes in New Jersey were compared with a weighted combination of 36 states that did not implement any kind of reform to pretrial detention during the study period. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to March 2024. Implementation of New Jersey's cash bail reform law in 2017. Quarterly rates of fatal and nonfatal firearm assault injuries and firearm self-harm injuries per 100 000 people. Although New Jersey's pretrial detention population dramatically decreased under bail reform, the study did not find evidence of increases in overall firearm mortality (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.26 deaths per 100 000) or gun violence (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.24 deaths per 100 000), or within racialized groups during the postpolicy period. Incarceration and gun violence are major public health problems impacting racially and economically marginalized groups. Cash bail reform may be an important tool for reducing pretrial detention and advancing health equity without exacerbating community violence.

Social Vulnerability and Firearm Violence: An Examination of the Correlates of Fatal and Nonfatal Shootings

The current study uses the CDC’s social vulnerability index (SVI), an underutilized measure in criminology, to examine patterns of fatal and nonfatal firearm violence. The SVI is an index that captures the level of social vulnerability within communities that can reflect a community’s ability to withstand many stressors, including firearm violence. Results indicate that vulnerable communities, as measured by the SVI, experience disproportionate firearm violence. Results also show that neighborhood firearm violence is influenced by nearby neighborhoods’ levels of social vulnerability. That is, neighborhoods that are surrounded by other neighborhoods with high levels of social vulnerability experience more firearm violence. These results are important for policymakers who seek to address the root causes of vulnerabilities that impact firearm violence indirectly, and the results provide a foundation for future application of the SVI within criminology.

Examining the Relation Between Early Violence Exposure and Firearm-Related Experiences in Emerging Adulthood: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Firearms are a leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults in the United States. Early exposure to violence, as a victim or witness, is associated with increased risk of firearm-related experiences, including carrying and threatening others with a gun. These experiences, in turn, increase the risk of both fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries. Using an ethnically diverse sample of emerging adults, we build on prior research by examining the link between early violence exposure at multiple contexts of the social-ecological model and multiple firearm-related experiences (i.e., firearm-threatening victimization, firearm-threatening perpetration, and firearm carriage). We analyzed data from a 10-year longitudinal study of 1042 youth in the Southern United States. Experiencing childhood physical abuse was associated with both firearm-threatening victimization and perpetration in emerging adulthood. Additionally, exposure to neighborhood and interparental violence were linked to threatening others with firearms and carrying firearms, respectively. Counter to expectations, bullying victimization did not emerge as a predictor of any firearm-related experiences. Findings highlight the importance of cross-cutting violence prevention efforts to prevent high-risk firearm-related behaviors among emerging adults. Programs for children and adolescents that address these types of violence exposure should highlight coping skills and sources of positive social support to bolster protective factors against firearm-related outcomes.

EMS injury cause codes more accurate than emergency department visit ICD-10-CM codes for firearm injury intent in North Carolina.

The timeliness, accuracy, and completeness of data for firearm injury surveillance is crucial for public health surveillance efforts and informing injury prevention measures. While emergency department (ED) visit data can provide near real-time information on firearms injuries, there are concerns surrounding the accuracy of intent coding in these data. We examined whether emergency medical service (EMS) data provide more accurate firearm injury intent coding in comparison to ED data. We applied a firearm injury definition to EMS encounter data in NC's statewide syndromic surveillance system (NC DETECT), from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2022. We manually reviewed each record to determine intent, and the corresponding manual classifications were compared to the injury cause codes entered in the EMS data and to ED visit records where EMS-ED record linkage was possible. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for each intent classification in SAS 9.4 using the manually reviewed intent classifications as the gold standard. We identified 9557 EMS encounters from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2022 meeting our firearm injury definition. After removing false positives and duplicates, 8584 records were available for manual injury classification. Overall, our analysis demonstrated that manual and EMS injury cause code classifications were comparable. However, for the 3401 EMS encounters that could be linked to an ED visit record, sensitivity of the ED ICD-10-CM codes was low for assault and intentional self-harm encounters at 18.2% (CI 16.5-19.9%) and 22.2% (CI 16-28.5%), respectively. This demonstrates a marked difference in the reliability of the intent coding in the two data sources. This study illustrates both the value of examining EMS encounters for firearm injury intent, and the challenges of accurate intent coding in the ED setting. EMS coding has the potential for more accurate intent coding than ED coding within the context of existing hospital-based coding guidance. This may have implications for future firearm injury research, especially for nonfatal firearm injuries.

Analysis of Factors Influencing Financial Cost and Morbidity in Nonfatal Firearm Injuries.

Representing 68% of firearm-related injuries, nonfatal firearm injuries cause substantial morbidity and are associated with high costs to patients and the health care system. A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate 359 adults in the Southeastern United States from 2019 to 2021. IBM SPSS was used for descriptive and parametric statistical analysis. The mean total cost of stay (TCOS) was $36,639.12, length of stay (LOS) was 8.61 days, number of times to the operating room was 1.88, and number of follow-ups was 3.21. Vascular and traumatic brain injuries were associated with higher TCOS and LOS. Vascular injuries were associated with more operating room visits. Bony injuries and non-TBI neurological injuries were associated with more follow-up appointments. In this brief report, we aim to understand the effect injury types have on these factors to help inform trauma protocol development with the goal of decreasing financial burdens.

Gender Differences in Characteristics and Consequences of Nonfatal Firearm Abuse in Intimate Partner Violence

Gender Differences in Characteristics and Consequences of Nonfatal Firearm Abuse in Intimate Partner Violence

Persistent Opioid Use Following Pediatric Nonfatal Firearm Injury

ObjectiveFirearms are a major cause of pediatric injury. An analysis of opioid use following pediatric firearm injury has not previously been reported. Our objective was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with persistent opioid use among pediatric nonfatal firearm injury victims. MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using 2015–18 claims data from the Merative MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid and Commercial Databases, utilizing International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for firearm injury and National Drug Codes for opioids. Dispensed opioid claims were used as a proxy for opioid use. Opioid exposure was defined both dichotomously and continuously (by the total number of opioid days prescribed) in the 30 days following discharge from firearm injury index encounter. Persistent opioid use was defined as ≥1 opioid claim(s) in the 90 to 270 days following index encounter. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether covariates of interest were associated with greater odds of persistent opioid use. ResultsOur cohort consisted of 2110 children who experienced nonfatal firearm injury (mean age 13.5, 80.9% male, 79.5% Medicaid) with 608 children (28.8%) exposed to opioids. Of patients exposed to opioids, 10.4% developed persistent opioid use. In adjusted analyses, each opioid day dispensed during the exposure period represented 5% greater odds of experiencing persistent opioid use. ConclusionsClinicians caring for children injured by firearms should be aware of the risk of developing persistent opioid use and balance that risk with the need to sufficiently control pain.

Identifying overlaps and disconnects between media reports and official records of nonfatal firearm injuries in Indianapolis, Indiana, 2021–2022

ObjectiveOpen-source data systems, largely drawn from media sources, are commonly used by scholars due to the lack of a comprehensive national data system. It is unclear if these data provide an accurate and complete representation of firearm injuries and their context. The study objectives were to compare firearm injuries in official police records with media reports to better identify the characteristics associated with media reporting. MethodsFirearm injuries were identified in open-source media reports and compared to nonfatal firearm injury (n = 1642) data from official police records between January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022 in Indianapolis, Indiana. Events were matched on date, location, and event circumstances. Four multivariate, multi-level mixed effects logistic regression models were conducted to assess which survivor, event, and community characteristics were associated with media reporting. Data were analyzed 2023 – January 2024. ResultsMedia reported 41% of nonfatal shootings in 2021 and 45% in 2022(p < 0.05), which is approximately two out of every five shootings. Shootings involving multiple survivors, children, and self-defense were more likely to be reported, whereas unintentional shootings and shootings that occurred in structurally disadvantaged communities were less likely to be reported. ConclusionsFindings suggest that relying on media reports of firearm injuries alone may misrepresent the numbers and contexts of shootings. Public health interventions that educate journalists about these important issues may be an impactful firearm violence prevention strategy. Also, it is critical to link data systems at the local level to ensure interventions are designed and evaluated using accurate data.

Health Care Utilization After Nonfatal Firearm Injuries.

Despite the high incidence of firearm injuries, little is known about health care utilization after nonfatal childhood firearm injuries. This study aimed to describe health care utilization and costs after a nonfatal firearm injury among Medicaid and commercially insured youth using a propensity score matched analysis. We conducted a propensity score matched cohort analysis using 2015 to 2018 Medicaid and Commercial Marketscan data comparing utilization in the 12-months post firearm injury for youth aged 0 to 17. We matched youth with a nonfatal firearm injury 1:1 to comparison noninjured youth on demographic and preindex variables. Outcomes included inpatient hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and outpatient visits as well as health care costs. Following propensity score matching, regression models estimated relative risks of the health care utilization outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. We identified 2110 youth with nonfatal firearm injury. Compared with matched noninjured youth, firearm injured youth had a 5.31-fold increased risk of inpatient hospitalization (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.93-7.20), 1.49-fold increased risk of ED visit (95% CI 1.37-1.62), and 1.06-fold increased risk of outpatient visit (95% CI 1.03-1.10) 12-months postinjury. Adjusted 12-month postindex costs were $7581 (95% CI $7581-$8092) for injured youth compared with $1990 (95% CI $1862-2127) for comparison noninjured youth. Youth who suffer nonfatal firearm injury have a significantly increased risk of hospitalizations, ED visits, outpatient visits, and costs in the 12 months after injury when compared with matched youth. Applied to the 11 258 US youth with nonfatal firearm injuries in 2020, estimates represent potential population health care savings of $62.9 million.

Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Firearm Injuries in the U.S., 2019 and 2020

Firearm-related injuries are among the five leading causes of death for people aged 1-44 years in the U.S. The immediate and long-term harms of firearm injuries pose an economic burden on society. Fatal and nonfatal firearm injury costs in the U.S. were estimated providing up-to-date economic burden estimates. Counts of nonfatal firearm injuries were obtained from the 2019-2020 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Emergency Department Sample. Data on nonfatal injury intent were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System - Firearm Injury Surveillance System. Counts of deaths (firearm as underlying cause) were obtained from the 2019-2020 multiple cause-of-death mortality data from the National Vital Statistics System. Analyses were conducted in 2023. The total cost of firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. for 2020 was $493.2 billion, a 16 percent increase compared with 2019. There are significant disparities in the cost of firearm deaths in 2019-2020, with non-Hispanic Black people, males, and young and middle-aged groups being the most affected. Most of the nonfatal firearm injury-related costs are attributed to hospitalization. These findings highlight the racial/ethnic differences in fatal firearm injuries and the disproportionate cost burden to urban areas. Addressing this important public health problem can help ameliorate the costs to our society from the rising rates of firearm injuries.

Firearm injuries in Missouri.

Firearm deaths continue to be a major public health problem, but the number of non-fatal firearm injuries and the characteristics of patients and injuries is not well known. The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, with support from the National Collaborative on Gun Violence Research, leveraged an existing data system to capture lethal and non-lethal injuries, including patients treated and discharged from the emergency department and collect additional data on firearm injuries that present to trauma centers. In 2020, Missouri had the 4th highest firearm mortality rate in the country at 23.75/100,000 population compared to 13.58/100,000 for the US overall. We examined the characteristics of patients from Missouri with firearm injuries in this cross-sectional study. Of the overall 17,395 patients, 1,336 (7.7%) were treated at one of the 11 participating trauma centers in Missouri during the 12-month study period. Patients were mostly male and much more likely to be Black and uninsured than residents in the state as a whole. Nearly three-fourths of the injuries were due to assaults, and overall 7.7% died. Few patients received post-discharge services.