Non-conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques Research Articles

Use of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.

Brain parenchymal lesions are frequently observed on conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder, but the specific morphological and temporal patterns distinguishing them unequivocally from lesions caused by other disorders have not been identified. This literature review summarizes the literature on advanced quantitative imaging measures reported for patients with NMO spectrum disorder, including proton MR spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetization transfer imaging, quantitative MR volumetry, and ultrahigh-field strength MRI. It was undertaken to consider the advanced MRI techniques used for patients with NMO by different specialists in the field. Although quantitative measures such as proton MR spectroscopy or magnetization transfer imaging have not reproducibly revealed diffuse brain injury, preliminary data from diffusion-weighted imaging and brain tissue volumetry indicate greater white matter than gray matter degradation. These findings could be confirmed by ultrahigh-field MRI. The use of nonconventional MRI techniques may further our understanding of the pathogenic processes in NMO spectrum disorders and may help us identify the distinct radiographic features corresponding to specific phenotypic manifestations of this disease.

Magnetic resonance monitoring of lesion evolution in multiple sclerosis

Disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS) is strongly linked to the formation of new lesions, which involves a complex sequence of inflammatory, degenerative, and reparative processes. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, such as T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted sequences, are highly sensitive in demonstrating the spatial and temporal dissemination of demyelinating plaques in the brain and spinal cord. Hence, these techniques can provide quantitative assessment of disease activity in patients with MS, and they are commonly used in monitoring treatment efficacy in clinical trials and in individual cases. However, the correlation between conventional MRI measures of disease activity and the clinical manifestations of the disease, particularly irreversible disability, is weak. This has been explained by a process of exhaustion of both structural and functional redundancies that increasingly prevents repair and recovery, and by the fact that these imaging techniques do not suffice to explain the entire spectrum of the disease process and lesion development. Nonconventional MRI techniques, such as magnetization transfer imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which can selectively measure the more destructive aspects of MS pathology and monitor the reparative mechanisms of this disease, are increasingly being used for serial analysis of new lesion formation and provide a better approximation of the pathological substrate of MS plaques. These nonconventional MRI-based measures better assess the serial changes in newly forming lesions and improve our understanding of the relationship between the damaging and reparative mechanisms that occur in MS.

Differences between conventional and non conventional MRI techniques in Parkinson�s disease

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides an in vivo assessment of cortical and subcortical regions affected in Parkinson’s disease (PD). This review summarizes the most important conventional and non-conventional MRI techniques applied in this field. Standard neuroimaging techniques have played a marginal role in the diagnosis and follow-up of PD, essentially being used only to discriminate atypical syndromes from PD, to exclude secondary causes such as vascular lesions, and to confirm the absence of specific imaging features found in atypical parkinsonisms. However, non-conventional MRI techniques, i.e. new neuroimaging approaches such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI, may allow the detection of structural, functional and metabolic changes useful not only for differential diagnosis, but also for early diagnosis and outcome and treatment monitoring in PD. In addition, we illustrate the advantages of high-field MRI over lower magnetic fields, highlighting the great potential of advanced neuroimaging techniques.

Differences between conventional and non conventional MRI techniques in Parkinson�s disease

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides an in vivo assessment of cortical and subcortical regions affected in Parkinson's disease (PD). This review summarizes the most important conventional and non-conventional MRI techniques applied in this field. Standard neuroimaging techniques have played a marginal role in the diagnosis and follow-up of PD, essentially being used only to discriminate atypical syndromes from PD, to exclude secondary causes such as vascular lesions, and to confirm the absence of specific imaging features found in atypical parkinsonisms. However, non-conventional MRI techniques, i.e. new neuroimaging approaches such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging, and functional MRI, may allow the detection of structural, functional and metabolic changes useful not only for differential diagnosis, but also for early diagnosis and outcome and treatment monitoring in PD. In addition, we illustrate the advantages of high-field MRI over lower magnetic fields, highlighting the great potential of advanced neuroimaging techniques.

Clinico-radiological dissociation in multiple sclerosis: Future prospects

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has significantly contributed to our capabilities of diagnosis multiple sclerosis (MS) since it is able to detect demyelinating lesions in almost 100% of patients. However, there are modest correlations between irreversible disability and white matter lesion load, as measured by T2-weighted MRI scans, which represents the clinicoradiological paradox of MS. We report the case of a patient with MS and few neurological manifestations despite extensive T2 visible morphologic abnormalities. The use of non-conventional MRI techniques, which are more specific in the analysis of the pathological substrate of demyelinating lesions and normal appearing brain matter (both white and gray matter), might assist us to overcome this limitation of conventional MRI.

Recent Developments in Imaging of Multiple Sclerosis

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revolutionized the diagnosis and management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Metrics derived from conventional MRI are now routinely used to detect therapeutic effects and extend clinical observations. Conventional MRI measures have insufficient sensitivity and specificity to reveal the true degree of pathologic changes occurring in MS. T2-weighted and T1-weighted imaging cannot distinguish between inflammation, edema, demyelination, Wallerian degeneration, and axonal loss. Nonconventional MRI techniques are now emerging and proving to be more related with the most disabling features of MS. The large variety of MRI metrics presently available are summarized, including measurement of T1-weighted hypointense lesions, central nervous system atrophy, magnetization transfer imaging, myelin water fraction, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and susceptibility-weighted imaging. The most up-to-date MRI techniques and their relationship with central nervous system pathology are described, and a comprehensive overview of the use of MRI in patients with MS is offered. Advanced MRI techniques provide a better understanding of the pathologic processes that most likely are related to disease activity and clinical progression. Such metrics are able to reveal a range of tissue changes that include demyelination, axonal loss, iron deposition, and neurodegeneration and they provide the evidence that important occult pathology is occurring in the normal appearing white and gray matter. Despite these promising results none of these techniques have been adopted in the MRI consensus guidelines for imaging of the brain and spinal cord in patients with MS due to lack of standardization.

The place of conventional MRI and newly emerging MRI techniques in monitoring different aspects of treatment outcome

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most important paraclinical measure for assessing and monitoring the pathologic changes implicated in the onset and progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). Conventional MRI sequences, such as T1-weighted gadolinium (Gd) enhanced and spin-echo T2-weighted imaging, only provide an incomplete picture of the degree of inflammation and underlying neurodegenerative changes in this disease. Two- and three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and double inversion recovery sequences allow better identification of cortical, periventricular and infratentorial lesions. Ultra-high field strength MRI has the potential to detect subpial cortical and deep gray matter lesions. Unenhanced T1-weighted imaging can reveal hypointense black holes, a measure of chronic neurodegeneration. Magnetization transfer imaging (MTI) is increasingly used to characterize the evolution of MS lesions and normal-appearing brain tissue. Evidence suggests that the dynamics of magnetization transfer changes correlate with the extent of demyelination and remyelination. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, which provides details on tissue biochemistry, metabolism, and function, also has the capacity to reveal neuroprotective mechanisms. By measuring the motion of water, diffusion imaging can provide information about the orientation, size, and geometry of tissue damage in white and gray matter. These advanced non-conventional MRI techniques relate better to clinical impairment, disease progression, accumulation of disability, and have the potential to detect neuroprotective effects of treatment. Although detecting the status of neuronal integrity using MRI techniques continues to improve, a "gold standard" model remains to be established.

Qu’attendre des nouvelles techniques IRM dans l’étude de la sclérose en plaques

Although conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for diagnosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and monitoring disease activity and course, the correlation between conventional MRI data and clinical findings remains weak. This "clinical-MRI paradox" could be partly due to the lack of MRI specificity related to the heterogeneous pathological substrates of MS and to its inability to quantify the extent of damage in the normal-appearing tissue. Recently, non-conventional MRI techniques, including magnetization transfer MRI, diffusion tensor MRI, and proton MR spectroscopy have been applied to improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of MS. These techniques may provide information about structural and biochemical changes occurring within and outside macroscopic MS lesions (inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss), in particular in the normal-appearing white and grey matter. These techniques could also significantly improve our ability to monitor inflammatory demyelination and axonal injury. In the same way, functional MRI gives us the potential substrate to assess the mechanisms of adaptive cortical reorganization, which may limit the irreversible consequences of MS tissue injury.

MRI markers of destructive pathology in multiple sclerosis-related cognitive dysfunction

Studies with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicate that cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is not fully explained by the burden of T2-visible lesions in the brain. Other non-conventional MRI techniques with increased specificity to the more destructive aspects of MS pathology, such as magnetization transfer MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, have recently been applied to MS cognitive studies. The results suggest that the presence and extent of “occult” MS pathological features in the normal-appearing brain tissue and the location of lesions in eloquent sites play a central role in the pathogenesis of MS neuropsychological impairment.

Clinical and imaging metrics for monitoring disease progression in patients with multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the CNS leading to clinical disability in 250,000–350,000 young adults in the USA and Europe. The disease affects both white matter (WM) and gray matter (GM) tissues of the brain and spinal cord. While WM disease is easily quantified using currently available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, identification and quantification of GM disease present a daily challenge. Nonconventional brain and spinal cord MRI techniques, including magnetization transfer, MRI spectroscopy and diffusion tensor imaging, have improved our understanding of MS pathology in the deep GM. The sensitivity of high-resolution MRI obtained at a high magnetic field will improve the detection of spinal cord and brain cortical GM disease. The appropriate use of the above-mentioned techniques has the potential to more accurately explain the level of disability in MS patients.

Role of MRI in multiple sclerosis I: inflammation and lesions.

Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can improve accuracy in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Metrics derived from conventional MRI are now routinely used to detect therapeutic effects and extend clinical observations. Hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted MRI scans are related primarily to increased water content and thus cannot distinguish between inflammation, edema, demyelination, Wallerian degeneration, and axonal loss. In addition, T2-weighted and post-contrast images are not sufficiently sensitive to detect occult disease affecting normal appearing gray and white matter. They do not show a reliable correlation with clinical measures of disability and do not provide a complete assessment of therapeutic outcomes. In the past few years a host of advanced MRI techniques and analysis methods have been introduced for the assessment of MS. These MRI techniques appear to have better reliability as surrogate markers for monitoring the pathologic processes that most likely are related to disease activity and clinical progression. They are able to reveal a range of tissue changes that include edema, inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss, and neurodegeneration. Therefore, in a disease with a high degree of longitudinal variability of clinical signs and symptoms within and between patients, and with no current adequate biological markers of disease progression, non-conventional MRI techniques provide a powerful tool to non-invasively study pathological substrates of overt lesions and normal appearing brain tissue. In particular, the use of these techniques is promising in elucidating mechanisms underlying the accumulation of tissue damage, repair and functional reorganization of neural pathways in patients with MS.

The role of nonconventional magnetic resonance imaging techniques in demyelinating disorders.

The use of nonconventional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (eg, magnetization transfer, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion weighted imaging) allows for an accurate characterization of lesions as compared with conventional or standard approaches in demyelinating diseases. Magnetization transfer, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and diffusion weighted imaging have revolutionized our understanding of demyelinating diseases because these techniques have been used to identify pathologic changes of normal-appearing brain tissue and characterize the differences in lesions. Metrics derived from these methods correlate with clinical disability and provide more accurate tools for monitoring disease activity and treatment effect over time. Quantitative T1 and T2 relaxation time maps provide additional information on demyelinating diseases, allowing for the evaluation of myelin water and distribution of water within tissues. Finally, the measurement of central nervous system atrophy has become a valuable element in determining the course of multiple sclerosis.

Clinical and MRI assessment of brain damage in MS.

Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS), generally in the form of the so-called subcortical dementia, results predominantly by the disruption of communication among cortical and subcortical areas, consequent to white matter damage. Studies with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated that cognitive impairment in MS patients is related to lesion burden, although the strength of this correlation is weak. This can be partially explained by the poor pathological specificity of conventional MRI techniques and by damage in the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). This interpretation is supported by studies using non-conventional MRI techniques, more specific to the heterogeneous substrates of MS pathology, such as the assessment of hypointense lesion load on T1-weighted scans and the measurement of the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) of whole brain, MS lesions and NAWM. Other factors, such as the site of MS lesions and the presence of active inflammation, also seem to play an important role.

Correlatos de los estudios de resonancia magnética nuclear con la disfunción cognitiva observada en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple

Studies with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) support the hypothesis that cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients is related with the lesion burden. Patterns of frontal lobe cognitive decline were also found to be related with the corresponding regional lesion load, although the total lesion load on T2-weighted MRI scans of the brain seems to be more relevant in determining frontal lobe deficits. Other non-conventional MRI techniques with a higher specificity to the heterogeneous substrates of MS pathology, such as the assessment of hypointense lesion load on T1-weighted scans and the histogram analysis of magnetization transfer ratio maps, have recently been applied to MS cognitive studies. Results from these studies suggest that three factors play a role in the pathogenesis of MS dementia: the burden of MS lesions, the severity of the pathological damage within individual lesions and that of the normal-appearing white matter.

Assessment of the damage of the cerebral hemispheres in MS using neuroimaging techniques.

The pattern of mental dysfunction in multiple sclerosis (MS) is characteristic of the so-called subcortical dementia. Cognitive dysfunction results predominantly by the disruption of communication among cortical and subcortical areas, as a consequence of the white matter damage. As expected, studies with conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated that cognitive impairment in MS patients is related to the lesion burden, although the strength of this correlation is weak. This can be partially explained by the poor pathological specificity of conventional MRI techniques and by the invisible damage in the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM). Recent studies using non-conventional MRI techniques with a higher specificity for the heterogeneous substrates of MS pathology, such as the assessment of hypointense lesion load on T1-weighted scans and the measurement of the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) of whole brain, MS lesions and NAWM, support this interpretation. Other factors, such as the site of MS lesions and the presence of active inflammation, also seem to play an important role.

Magnetic resonance imaging in the differential diagnosis and monitoring of the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Treatments with potentially beneficial effects on the course of multiple sclerosis are now emerging and magnetic resonance imaging techniques are needed which have a high specificity for diagnosing multiple sclerosis, and which can characterize the heterogeneous nature of multiple sclerosis lesions and define disease evolution over time. Differential diagnosis may be improved by the use of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, high-resolution spinal cord and optic nerve magnetic resonance imaging and non-conventional magnetic resonance imaging techniques. In the monitoring of treatment, a number of different approaches have been used to increase magnetic resonance imaging accuracy in describing and predicting disease activity and evolution. These include optimization of the acquisition and post-processing of data obtained with conventional magnetic resonance imaging techniques (T2-weighted and postcontrast T1-weighted sequences) and the use of newer nonconventional magnetic resonance imaging techniques.