IntroductionPatients scheduled to undergo vascular surgery represent a significant population at risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE’s) post operation. This is due to a number of inflammatory mechanisms, designed to aid in post surgical recovery. A number of screening tools have been designed such as the EAGLE risk score or the Goldman and Detsky scores, to aid in identification of at-risk individuals. Recently inflammatory biomarkers have been suggested as a tool to aid in this assessment. The role of interleukins such as IL-1 and Il-6 have particularly been of interest to current research. Our hypothesis aims to test whether there is any benefit to measuring inflammatory biomarkers post operation as a tool to identify individuals at risk of MACEs. MethodWe identified 75 eligible patients scheduled to undergo vascular surgery (bypass, EVAR or open AAA repair or endarterectomy) and measured four inflammatory biomarkers (IL-1, IL-6, ICAM-1 & CRP) pre and post operatively on days 1-4 to identify correlations and identify differences in individuals who had a MACE vs those that didn't. A MACE was defined by a rise in T troponin of 0.06 or greater or ECG changes agreed upon by two clinicians or a stroke ResultsOf the 75 patients, 13 were identified to have a MACE. The result showed that both IL-1 and ICAM show a significantly positive correlation between pre and post operative levels with ICAM-1 significantly positive on all 4 days and IL-1 significantly positive on days 1, 3 & 4. When comparing the significant difference in change in inflammatory biomarkers between the MACE group and non-MACE group, a significant difference was only noted in the ICAM biomarker. ICAM was significantly different between the two groups on day 1 and day 2 (t test value 0.0455 and 0.0492 respectively) but was non-significant on days 3 and 4. All other biomarkers showed no significant difference pre and post op. DiscussionOverall, it is suggestable that measuring inflammatory biomarkers in vascular surgery patients is a valuable aid to clinicians in potentially identifying at-risk groups and should be used as an adjunct to already existing mechanisms available to the clinician.
Read full abstract