Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Users Research Articles

Optimal adherence threshold to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation to reduce the risk of thromboembolism and death

Abstract Background Poor adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may raise thromboembolic risks in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the minimal adherence to maintain the protective effects of NOACs is currently unknown. Purpose To investigate thresholds of NOAC adherence in association with thromboembolic and mortality risks. Methods Using two Belgian nationwide healthcare databases, AF patients ≥45 years old with ≥1 NOAC prescription claim between January 1st, 2013 and January 1st, 2019 were identified. Patients were followed from NOAC initiation until the first occurrence of the investigated outcome, treatment discontinuation (>60-day supply gap), switch to VKAs, death, emigration or end of the study period. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) after one year of treatment. Inverse probability weighted Cox regression (adjusting for 39 confounding covariates) was used to investigate outcomes (identified using International Classification of Diseases-coded hospital discharge diagnoses and medical procedure codes) between NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 100% (reference group) and NOAC users with lower PDCs. Results A total of 92,111 newly-treated AF patients were included during a mean follow-up of 2.7 ± 1.4 years (250,750 person-years of on-treatment follow-up). The proportions of persistent NOAC users with a PDC of 100%, 95-99%, 90-94%, 85-89%, 80-84% and <80% after one year of treatment were 62.7%, 17.4%, 9.5%, 5.1%, 2.8% and 2.5%, respectively. Compared to NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 100%, significantly higher risks of stroke or systemic embolism were observed among NOAC users with PDCs of 85-89% (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.19-1.54)), 80-84% (aHR 1.31, 95%CI (1.08-1.58)) and <80% (aHR 1.64, 95%CI (1.34-2.01)), while no significant differences were observed among NOAC users with one-year PDCs of 95-99% (aHR 1.02, 95%CI (0.94-1.12)) or 90-94% (aHR 1.06, 95%CI (0.95-1.18)) after multivariable adjustment. Significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (aHR 1.09, 95%CI (1.01-1.17) and major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding (aHR 1.10, 95%CI (1.04-1.16) were observed with decreasing levels of NOAC adherence, starting from NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 90-94% versus 100%. Findings were similar with once-daily and twice-daily dosed NOACs. Conclusion Lower adherence to NOAC treatment is associated with increased risks of thromboembolism, all-cause mortality and bleeding. For adequate stroke prevention in AF, the optimal adherence threshold to NOAC treatment should be at least 90%, irrespective of the dosing regimen of NOACs.Figure 1

Pharmacodynamic Drug-Drug Interactions and Bleeding Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Using Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

Pharmacodynamic drug-drug interactions (PD DDIs) may influence the safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), but the extent to which PD DDIs increase bleeding risks, remains unclear. Therefore, the impact of PD DDIs on bleeding outcomes in NOAC-treated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was investigated. Using Belgian nationwide data, NOAC-treated AF patients were included between 2013-2019. Concomitant use of PD interacting drugs when initiating NOAC treatment was identified. Among 193,072 patients, PD DDIs were identified in 114,122 (59.1%) subjects. After multivariable adjustment, concomitant use of PD interacting drugs was associated with significantly higher risks of major or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.19, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.13-1.24)), gastrointestinal (aHR 1.12, 95%CI (1.03-1.22)), urogenital (aHR 1.21, 95%CI (1.09-1.35)) and other bleeding (aHR 1.28, 95%CI (1.20-1.36)), compared to NOAC-treated AF patients without PD interacting drug use. Increased bleeding risks were most pronounced with P2Y12 inhibitors (aHR 1.62, 95%CI (1.48-1.77)) and corticosteroids (aHR 1.53, 95%CI (1.42-1.66)), followed by selective serotonin or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRI, aHR 1.26, 95%CI (1.17-1.35)), low-dose aspirin (aHR 1.14, 95%CI (1.08-1.20)) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID, aHR 1.10, 95%CI (1.01-1.21)). Significantly higher intracranial bleeding risks in NOAC users were observed with SSRI/SNRIs (aHR 1.50, 95%CI (1.25-1.81)) and corticosteroids (aHR 1.49, 95%CI (1.21-1.84)). Concomitant use of PD interacting drugs, especially P2Y12 inhibitors and corticosteroids, was associated with higher major, gastrointestinal, urogenital, and other bleeding risks in NOAC-treated AF patients. Remarkably, higher intracranial bleeding risks were observed with SSRI/SNRIs and corticosteroids.

Abstract 072: Risk Factors for Developing Ischemic Strokes While Taking Non‐Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants

Introduction Over the past decade, non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have replaced warfarin as the initial strategy for stroke prevention in non‐valvular atrial fibrillation. However, ischemic strokes occurring in patients taking NOACs are becoming increasingly more frequent. In this study, we aimed to determine the clinical, echocardiographic, and neuroimaging markers associated with developing ischemic strokes in patients taking NOACs for atrial fibrillation. Methods Among atrial fibrillation patients on NOACs with and without ischemic stroke, brain MRIs were reviewed for the presence of neuroimaging markers of small vessel disease. Transthoracic echocardiography reports were reviewed to obtain left atrial volumes, presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, ejection fractions, and presence of wall motion abnormalities. Clinical and radiologic variables with significant differences between groups were entered into a multivariable regression model to determine predictors of ischemic stroke. In the ischemic stroke group, a Cox regression analysis was constructed to determine predictors of ischemic stroke recurrence during follow‐up. Results 112 patients with ischemic stroke and 94 controls (free of ischemic stroke) were included in the study. The mean age (77±9 years vs. 74±11 years, p = 0.13) and proportion of patients with CHA2DS2‐VASc>2 were similar between controls and ischemic stroke patients (82% vs. 83%, p = 0.86). The variables that were significantly different between groups included apixaban use, dabigatran use, prior cerebrovascular events, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial volume index, and severe white matter hyperintensities. After multivariable adjustment, prior cerebrovascular events (aOR 23.86, 95% CI [6.02–94.48]), HbA1c levels (aOR 2.36, 95% CI [1.39–3.99]), left ventricular hypertrophy (aOR 2.73, 95% CI [1.11–6.71]) and left atrial volume index (aOR 1.05, 95% CI [1.01–1.08]) increased the risk of stroke, whereas apixaban use appeared to decrease the risk (aOR 0.38, 95% CI [0.16–0.92]). Among patients with ischemic stroke, there were 103 survivors, 82 (80%) of which had follow‐up data. The median follow‐up duration for these patients was 2.6 (0.5–4.7) years. Of these 82 patients, 11 (13%) experienced an ischemic stroke during the follow‐up period. Malignancy was associated with ischemic stroke recurrence (aHR 4.90, 95% CI [1.35–18.42]) after adjustment for age and chronic renal failure. Conclusion Prior cerebrovascular events, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, and left atrial size are associated with the development of ischemic stroke among NOAC users. Future studies should aim to investigate nonpharmacological stroke prevention strategies in patients with the vascular risk factors and echocardiographic risk markers identified in the present study.

Impact of P-glycoprotein and CYP3A4-interacting drugs on clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation using non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a nationwide cohort study.

The clinical relevance of common pharmacokinetic interactions with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) often remains unclear. Therefore, the impact of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers on clinical outcomes in NOAC-treated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) was investigated. AF patients were included between 2013 and 2019 using Belgian nationwide data. Concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4-interacting drugs at the time of NOAC initiation was identified. Among 193 072 NOAC-treated AF patients, 46 194 (23.9%) and 2903 (1.5%) subjects concomitantly used a P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor or inducer, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors was associated with significantly higher major bleeding [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.18-1.30)] and all-cause mortality risks [aHR 1.07, 95% CI (1.02-1.11)], but not with thromboembolism in NOAC-treated AF patients. A significantly increased risk of major bleeding was observed with amiodarone [aHR 1.27, 95% CI (1.21-1.34)], diltiazem [aHR 1.28, 95% CI (1.13-1.46)], verapamil [aHR 1.36, 95% CI (1.03-1.80)], ticagrelor [aHR 1.50, 95% CI (1.20-1.87)], and clarithromycin [aHR 1.55, 95% CI (1.14-2.11)]; and in edoxaban [aHR 1.24, 95% CI (1.06-1.45)], rivaroxaban [aHR 1.25, 95% CI (1.16-1.34)], and apixaban users [aHR 1.27, 95% CI (1.16-1.39)], but not in dabigatran users [aHR 1.07, 95% CI (0.94-1.23)]. Concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers (e.g. antiepileptic drugs like levetiracetam) was associated with a significantly higher stroke risk [aHR 1.31, 95% CI (1.03-1.68)], but not with bleeding or all-cause mortality. Concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors was associated with higher bleeding and all-cause mortality risks in NOAC users, whereas the use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers was associated with higher stroke risks.

Minimal Adherence Threshold to Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation to Reduce the Risk of Thromboembolism and Death: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

Poor adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may raise thromboembolic risks in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the minimal adherence to maintain the protective effect of NOACs is currently unknown. Therefore, we investigated thresholds of NOAC adherence in association with thromboembolic and mortality risks. Patients with AF initiating NOACs between 2013 and 2019 were identified in Belgian nationwide data. Adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) after one year of treatment. Inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox regression was used to investigate outcomes. 92,111 persons were included (250,750 person-years). Compared to NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 100%, significantly higher risks of stroke or systemic embolism were observed among NOAC users with PDCs of 85-89% (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.19-1.54)), 80-84% (aHR 1.31, 95%CI (1.08-1.58)) and < 80% (aHR 1.64, 95%CI (1.34-2.01)), while no significant differences were observed among NOAC users with one-year PDCs of 95-99% (aHR 1.02, 95%CI (0.94-1.12)) or 90-94% (aHR 1.06, 95%CI (0.95-1.18)). Significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality were observed with decreasing levels of NOAC adherence, which were already higher among NOAC users with a one-year PDC of 90-94% versus 100% (aHR 1.09, 95%CI (1.01-1.17)). Findings were similar with once-daily and twice-daily dosed NOACs. Poor adherence to NOACs is associated with increased risks of thromboembolism and all-cause mortality. The minimal adherence threshold should be ≥ 90%, preferably even ≥ 95%.

Left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial size are associated with ischemic strokes among non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant users.

Ischemic strokes (IS) occurring in patients taking non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are becoming increasingly more frequent. We aimed to determine the clinical, echocardiographic, and neuroimaging markers associated with developing IS in patients taking NOACs for atrial fibrillation. From a quaternary care center, clinical/radiologic data were collected from consecutive NOAC users with IS and age-matched controls without IS. Brain MRIs were reviewed for markers of cerebral small vessel disease. Variables with significant differences between groups were entered into a multivariable regression model to determine predictors of IS. Among IS patients, a Cox regression analysis was constructed to determine predictors of IS recurrence during follow-up. 112 patients with IS and 94 controls were included in the study. Variables significantly different between groups included apixaban use, dabigatran use, prior cerebrovascular events, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial volume index, and severe white matter hyperintensities. After multivariable adjustment, prior cerebrovascular events (aOR 23.86, 95% CI [6.02-94.48]), HbA1c levels (aOR 2.36, 95% CI [1.39-3.99]), left ventricular hypertrophy (aOR 2.73, 95% CI [1.11-6.71]) and left atrial volume index (aOR 1.05, 95% CI [1.01-1.08]) increased the risk of stroke, whereas apixaban use appeared to decrease the risk (aOR 0.38, 95% CI [0.16-0.92]). Malignancy was associated with IS recurrence (aHR 4.90, 95% CI [1.35-18.42]) after adjustment for age and chronic renal failure. Prior cerebrovascular events, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, and increased left atrial size are risk factors for developing an IS among NOAC users.

Effect of Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Polypharmacy: A Meta-analysis.

The aim of the present meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with polypharmacy. Randomized controlled trials or observational studies reporting the data of NOACs versus VKAs among AF patients with polypharmacy were included. The search was performed in the PubMed and Embase databases up to November 2022. A total of 12 studies involving 767,544 AF patients were included. For the primary outcomes, the use of NOACs compared with VKAs was significantly associated with a reduced risk of stroke or systemic embolism in AF patients with moderate polypharmacy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.77 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-0.86]) and severe polypharmacy (HR: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.69-0.82]), but there was no significant difference in major bleeding (moderate polypharmacy: HR: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74-1.01]; severe polypharmacy: HR: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.79-1.06]) between the two groups. In secondary outcomes, there were no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke, all-cause death, and gastrointestinal bleeding between the NOAC- and VKA- users, but NOAC users had a reduced risk of any bleeding compared with VKA- users. Compared with VKAs, the risk of intracranial hemorrhage was reduced in NOAC- users with moderate polypharmacy but not severe polypharmacy. In patients with AF and polypharmacy, NOACs showed advantages over VKAs in stroke or systemic embolism and any bleeding, and were comparable to VKAs for major bleeding, ischemic stroke, all-cause death, intracranial hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal bleeding.

Clinical consequences of off-label reduced dosing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivePostmarketing observational studies report that a substantial percentage of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receive a reduced non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) dose without a clear indication. Recently, increasing...

Safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin in patients on tuberculosis treatment

Anti-tuberculosis treatment can cause significant drug-drug interaction and interfere with effective anticoagulation. However, there is a lack of evidence and conflicting data on the optimal oral anticoagulation in patients treated for tuberculosis. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of anticoagulation with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in patients on anti-tuberculosis treatment. Patients on concomitant oral anticoagulation and anti-tuberculosis treatment including rifampin were identified from the Korean nationwide healthcare database. Subjects were censored at discontinuation of either anticoagulation or rifampin. The outcomes of interest were major bleeding, death, and ischemic stroke. A total 2090 patients (1153 on warfarin, 937 on NOAC) were included. NOAC users, compared to warfarin users, were older, had a lower prevalence of hypertension, heart failure, ischemic stroke, and aspirin use and a higher prevalence of cancer, with no significant differences in CHA2DS2-VASc or HAS-BLED scores. There were 18 major bleeding events, 106 deaths, and 50 stroke events during a mean follow-up of 2.9 months. After multivariable adjustment, the use of NOAC was associated with a lower risk of incident ischemic stroke (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27–0.94), while there was no significant difference in risk for major bleeding or death compared with warfarin. These results suggest that NOACs have better effectiveness for stroke prevention and similar safety compared with warfarin in patients on concomitant anti-tuberculosis treatment. This is the first study assessing the safety and effectiveness of NOACs compared to warfarin in this clinical scenario.

Adherence and persistence to oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: A Belgian nationwide cohort study.

BackgroundSince non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) do not require coagulation monitoring, concerns of lower adherence and persistence to NOACs than vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have been raised. Moreover, little is known on the frequency of permanent cessation and switching between anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Therefore, persistence, reinitiation, switching and adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) were investigated.Materials and methodsAF patients with a first OAC prescription claim between 2013 and 2019 were identified in Belgian nationwide data. Persistence, reinitiation and switching were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Adherence was investigated using the proportion of days covered (PDC). Predictors for non-adherence and non-persistence were identified by multivariable logistic regression.ResultsAmong 277,782 AF patients, 69.6% NOAC and 37.2% VKA users were persistent after 1 year, whereas 44.3% and 18.9% after 5 years, respectively. After one year, 67.1% rivaroxaban, 68.1% dabigatran, 69.8% apixaban, and 76.9% edoxaban users were persistent. Among subjects having discontinued NOAC or VKA treatment, 75.4% and 46.1% reinitiated any OAC within 5 years, respectively. VKAs were more frequently switched to NOACs than vice versa (17.6% versus 2.5% after 1 year). After 1 year, a high PDC (≥ 90%) was observed in 87.8% apixaban, 88.6% dabigatran, 91.3% rivaroxaban, and 94.7% edoxaban users (90.2% NOAC users). Adherence and persistence were higher in older, female subjects, while lower in subjects with dementia or hyperpolypharmacy.ConclusionAdherence and persistence to NOACs were high. However, 10% of subjects were non-adherent after 1 year and one-fourth did not reinitiate anticoagulation within 5 years after NOAC discontinuation.

Evaluation of Fracture Risk Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Different Oral Anticoagulants.

Patients with type 2 diabetes are at higher risk for fracture risk because of attenuated bone turnover and impaired bone microarchitecture. The comparative effect of warfarin over non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on incident fractures among patients with type 2 diabetes comorbid with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains to be elucidated. This was a retrospective, propensity score-weighted, population-based cohort study of adults with type 2 diabetes and AF who were started on warfarin or NOAC between 2005 and 2019 identified from an electronic database of the Hong Kong Hospital Authority. The primary outcome was a composite of major osteoporotic fractures (hip, clinical vertebral, proximal humerus, and wrist). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 15,770 patients with type 2 diabetes comorbid with AF were included (9,288 on NOAC, 6,482 on warfarin). During a median follow-up of 20 months, 551 patients (3.5%) sustained major osteoporotic fractures (201 [2.2%] in the NOAC group, 350 [5.4%] in the warfarin group). The adjusted cumulative incidence was lower among NOAC users than warfarin users (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.64, 0.99; P = 0.044). Subgroup analyses showed consistent protective effects against major osteoporotic fractures among NOAC users across sex, age, HbA1c, duration of diabetes, and history of severe hypoglycemia compared with warfarin users. NOAC use was associated with a lower risk of major osteoporotic fractures than warfarin use among patients with type 2 diabetes comorbid with AF. NOAC may be the preferred anticoagulant from the perspective of bone health.

Impact of P-glycoprotein and/or CYP3A4-interacting drugs on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) Background P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and CYP3A4-interacting drugs influence plasma levels of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). However, the clinical relevance is questioned. Purpose A critical appraisal of the impact of pharmacokinetically-interacting drugs on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods After searching Pubmed and Embase, phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and longitudinal observational cohort studies on the impact of concomitantly used P-gp/CYP3A4-interacting drugs on the risk-benefit profile of NOACs in AF patients during a mean/median follow-up of ≥6 months were included. A fixed effects meta-analysis was performed with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Results Fifteen studies were included (10 post hoc analyses of RCTs, 5 observational studies), investigating 21,711 and 306,421 NOAC-treated AF patients with and without P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitor use respectively, while only one study included P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers. In NOAC-treated AF patients, concomitant use of P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors was associated with significantly higher major bleeding (relative risk (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.01-1.19)) and all-cause mortality risks (RR 1.14, 95%CI (1.05-1.23)) compared to not using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors, while the risks of stroke/SE (RR 0.88, 95%CI (0.77-1.01)), intracranial bleeding (RR 0.89, 95%CI (0.68-1.15)) and gastro-intestinal bleeding (RR 1.09, 95%CI (0.91-1.30)) were not significantly different. Concomitant use of amiodarone with NOACs was associated with lower thromboembolic (RR 0.75, 95%CI (0.61-0.92)), but higher mortality risks (RR 1.21, 95%CI (1.05-1.39)). Co-administration of verapamil or diltiazem was associated with higher major bleeding risks (RR 1.64, 95%CI (1.31-2.06)), but no significantly different thromboembolic or mortality risks. Conclusions Given the higher bleeding and mortality risks in NOAC-treated AF patients concomitantly using P-gp/CYP3A4 inhibitors compared to NOAC users not taking interacting drugs, close monitoring of these patients is warranted, including regular medication review and addressing modifiable bleeding risk factors. Regarding P-gp/CYP3A4 inducers, a considerable research gap was identified, necessitating more research on their impact.

Comorbidities and Antithrombotic Treatment Pattern in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

ObjectiveNon-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are proven alternatives to warfarin for preventing stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to examine the treatment patterns and patient factors associated with the use of antiplatelet agents, warfarin, and NOACs in clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Korean Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service database. Patients receiving antithrombotics were identified before and after the introduction of NOACs (from August 1, 2013 to December 30, 2014 and July 1, 2015 to November 30, 2016, respectively). Patients were included if they were aged ≥18 years, had an atrial fibrillation diagnosis, and had a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. Treatment pattern was assessed by classifying patients into NOAC, warfarin, or antiplatelet users based on the first date of antithrombotic prescription. Clinical factors associated with the type of antithrombotics chosen were examined using logistic regression analyses.ResultsWe identified 129,465 and 196,243 patients before and after the introduction of NOACs, respectively. The proportion of antiplatelet users was 60.7 and 53.0% before and after the introduction of NOACs, respectively. The proportion of warfarin users was higher in patients with low HAS-BLED score, high CHA2DS2-VASc score, or stroke before the NOAC era. A similar trend was observed for NOAC and warfarin users after the introduction of NOAC. Compared with antiplatelets, warfarin and NOAC uses were significantly associated with CHA2DS2-VASc score and stroke, whereas presence of myocardial infarction (MI) and peripheral arterial disease were significantly associated with antiplatelets prescription. For comparisons between NOAC and warfarin, HAS-BLED and CHA2DS2-VASc scores showed significant associations with NOAC use, whereas comorbidities including MI were significantly associated with warfarin use.ConclusionsThe treatment pattern of antithrombotics did not change with the introduction of NOACs. However, comorbidities served as an important factor in choosing treatment regardless of NOAC entry.

Diabetes-Related Complications and Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Different Oral Anticoagulants : A Nationwide Analysis.

Evidence about the association between types of oral anticoagulants and hazards of diabetes complications is limited in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus (DM). To compare the hazards of diabetes complications and mortality between patients with AF and DM receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and those receiving warfarin. A retrospective cohort study. Nationwide data obtained from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Patients with AF and DM receiving NOACs or warfarin between 2012 and 2017 in Taiwan were enrolled. Treatment groups were determined by patients' first initiation of oral anticoagulants. Hazards of diabetes complications (macrovascular complications, microvascular complications, and glycemic emergency) and mortality in the NOAC and warfarin users were investigated with a target trial design. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Propensity score methods with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting were applied to balance potential confounders between treatment groups. In total, 19909 NOAC users and 10300 warfarin users were included. Patients receiving NOACs had significantly lower hazards of developing macrovascular complications (HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.91]; P < 0.001), microvascular complications (HR, 0.79 [CI, 0.73 to 0.85]; P < 0.001), glycemic emergency (HR, 0.91 [CI, 0.83 to 0.99]; P= 0.043), and mortality (HR, 0.78 [CI, 0.75 to 0.82]; P < 0.001) than those receiving warfarin. Analyses with propensity score matching showed similar results. Several sensitivity analyses further supported the robustness of our findings. The claims-based data did not allow for detailed data on patients' lifestyles and laboratory examinations to be obtained. Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were associated with lower hazards of diabetes complications and mortality than warfarin in patients with AF and DM. Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital.

Oral anticoagulation patterns and prognosis in octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation.

The relationship between oral anticoagulants (OACs) and prognosis in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)has not been adequately explored. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified subjects aged over 80 from a database of 1140 AF patients discharged from the cardiology ward of a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018. We examined the OAC treatment of octogenarian patients at discharge [VKA (vitamin K antagonist), NOAC (non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant), no OAC treatment]. We analyzed follow-up data of patients on OAC at discharge. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of stroke and major bleeding. The association of NOAC versus VKA treatment with these endpoints was assessed with multivariable Cox regression, using the VKA group as reference. A total of 330 octogenarian patients with AF were included with a mean (± SD) age of 83.9 ± 3.5years. At discharge, 53.3% received a NOAC, 30% a VKA, and 16.7% no OAC. Patients on OAC were followed-up over a median of 2.6-years . The adjusted risk of all-cause death was not different in the NOAC group, compared with the VKA group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.50-1.03; P = 0.07). The risk of stroke or major bleeding was not different either (all P > 0.05). In conclusion,in this cohort of post-discharge octogenarian patients with AF, the risk for all-cause death was similar in NOAC versus VKA users, after adjustment for baseline covariates. No differences in stroke and major bleeding events among these treatment groups were revealed.

Comparison of HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in atrial fibrillation patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry.

Bleeding risk assessment is recommended in guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The HAS-BLED score was proposed prior to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and it has been suggested that the ORBIT score may be superior in predicting bleeds in NOAC users. We aimed to compare the HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores in contemporary AF patients treated with NOACs. We analysed patients enrolled in the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF (EURObservational Research Programme in AF) General Long-Term Registry. HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores were computed based on original schemes. The primary outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding (MB). A total of 3018 patients (median age 70; 39.6% females) were included: median [interquartile range (IQR)] HAS-BLED and ORBIT scores were 1 [1-2] and 1 [0-2], respectively; 356 (11.8%) patients were at high risk for MB using HAS-BLED (≥3) and 123 (4.1%) using ORBIT (≥4). Overall, 60 (2.0%) MB events were recorded, with an incidence of 1.1 per 100 patient-years. Both HAS-BLED and ORBIT were associated with outcome, modestly predicting MB [area under the curve (AUC) 0.653, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.593-0.714 and AUC 0.601, 95% CI 0.526-0.677, respectively]. Calibration plots showed that both scores were poorly calibrated, particularly the ORBIT score, which showed consistent poorer calibration. Time-dependent reclassification analysis showed a trend towards incorrect lower risk reclassification using ORBIT compared with HAS-BLED. In this real-life contemporary cohort of AF patients treated with NOACs, the ORBIT score did not provide reclassification improvement, showing even poorer calibration compared with HAS-BLED. Our findings do not support the preferential use of ORBIT in NOAC-treated AF patients.

Characteristics of Ischemic Versus Hemorrhagic Stroke in Patients Receiving Oral Anticoagulants: Results of the PASTA Study.

Objective Limited data exist regarding the comparative detailed clinical characteristics of patients with ischemic stroke (IS)/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) receiving oral anticoagulants (OACs). Methods The prospective analysis of stroke patients taking oral anticoagulants (PASTA) registry, a multicenter registry of 1,043 stroke patients receiving OACs [vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOACs)] across 25 medical institutions throughout Japan, was used. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze differences in clinical characteristics between IS/TIA and ICH patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were registered in the PASTA registry. Results There was no significant differences in cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, smoking, or alcohol consumption (all p>0.05), between IS/TIA and ICH among both NOAC and VKA users. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) [odds ratio (OR), 4.77; p<0.0001] were independently associated with ICH, and high brain natriuretic peptide/N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels (OR, 1.89; p=0.0390) were independently associated with IS/TIA among NOAC users. A history of ICH (OR, 13.59; p=0.0279) and the high prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) (OR, 1.17; p<0.0001) were independently associated with ICH, and a history of IS/TIA (OR, 3.37; 95% CI, 1.34-8.49; p=0.0101) and high D-dimer levels (OR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.05-5.82; p=0.0377) were independently associated with IS/TIA among VKA users. Conclusion The presence of CMBs, a history of stroke, natriuretic peptide and D-dimer levels, and PT-INR may be useful for risk stratification of either IS/TIA or ICH development in patients with AF receiving OACs.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, proton pump inhibitors and gastrointestinal bleeds

ObjectiveTo evaluate if proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment reduces the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs).DesignWe...

Persistence and adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation across five Western European countries

AimsTo assess persistence and adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in five Western European healthcare settings.Methods and resultsWe conducted a multi-country observational cohort study, including 559 445 AF patients initiating NOAC therapy from Stockholm (Sweden), Denmark, Scotland, Norway, and Germany between 2011 and 2018. Patients were followed from their first prescription until they switched to a vitamin K antagonist, emigrated, died, or the end of follow-up. We measured persistence and adherence over time and defined adequate adherence as medication possession rate ≥90% among persistent patients only.ResultsOverall, persistence declined to 82% after 1 year and to 63% after 5 years. When including restarters of NOAC treatment, 85% of the patients were treated with NOACs after 5 years. The proportion of patients with adequate adherence remained above 80% throughout follow-up. Persistence and adherence were similar between countries and was higher in patients starting treatment in later years. Both first year persistence and adherence were lower with dabigatran (persistence: 77%, adherence: 65%) compared with apixaban (86% and 75%) and rivaroxaban (83% and 75%) and were statistically lower after adjusting for patient characteristics. Adherence and persistence with dabigatran remained lower throughout follow-up.ConclusionPersistence and adherence were high among NOAC users in five Western European healthcare settings and increased in later years. Dabigatran use was associated with slightly lower persistence and adherence compared with apixaban and rivaroxaban.

Assessment of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for the management of left ventricular thrombus.

Although several studies have assessed the effect of non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) relative to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with left ventricular thrombus, the results remain controversial. Herein, a meta‐analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs versus VKAs for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus. We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed and Embase databases until November 2020 for studies that compared the effects of NOACs versus VKAs in patients with left ventricular thrombus. The treatment effects were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled by a random‐effects model. Seven retrospective studies involving 865 patients with left ventricular thrombus (266 NOAC and 599 VKA users) were included. The pooled analysis suggested no difference in the rate of thrombus resolution between the NOAC and VKA groups (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.61–1.13). There were also no differences in the rates of stroke or systemic embolism (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.20–1.97), bleeding events (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.37–1.45), or all‐cause death (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.50–1.69) between patients treated with NOACs and those treated with VKAs. In addition, the rates of thrombus resolution, stroke or systemic embolism, bleeding events, and all‐cause death between NOAC‐ and warfarin‐treated patients were also similar. Our current evidence suggested that NOAC and VKA users had similar rates of thrombus resolution and clinical outcomes among patients with left ventricular thrombus. Further large‐scale prospective studies should confirm our results.