non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Research Articles

The association of inflammatory biomarkers and long-term clinical outcomes in older adults with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

The prognostic significance of inflammatory markers on the long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in older NSTEACS patients remains unclear. NSTEACS patients aged 75 and older were recruited to the multicentre cohort study Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk PatieNts with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ICON1). Inflammatory markers including interleukin-6 (IL-6), myeloperoxidase (MPO), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fibrinogen and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) were collected at baseline. Primary outcome was MACCE consisting of all-cause mortality, reinfarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, urgent revascularization, and significant bleeding at 5-year follow-up. There were 230 patients with baseline IL-6 (mean age 80.9 [interquartile range (IQR):78.2-83.9] years). High IL-6 was not associated with MACCE, but high IL-6 was independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.26 [95% Confidence Interval (CI):1.34-3.82]; P = 0.002). For patients with hsCRP (n = 260, mean age 80.9 [IQR:77.9-84.1] years), higher levels were significantly associated with increased risk of MACCE (aHR:1.77 [95% CI:1.26-2.49], P = 0.001). In the cohort with MPO (230 patients, mean age 80.9 [IQR:78.2-83.9] years), lower MPO was independently associated with the risk of MACCE (aHR: 0.67 [95%CI:0.46-0.96]; P = 0.029). There was no prognostic significance with fibrinogen and TNF-α. Among older NSTEACS patients, elevated IL-6 and hsCRP were associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and MACCE, respectively. Low MPO levels were associated with higher MACCE. Further studies are required to determine how these biomarkers should influence treatment strategy in this understudied subset. NCT01933581.

Coronary Artery Plaque Phenotype and 5-Year Clinical Outcomes in Older Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Coronary Artery Plaque Phenotype and 5-Year Clinical Outcomes in Older Patients with Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Invasive vs. conservative management of older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Older patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) are less likely to receive guideline-recommended care including coronary angiography and revascularization. Evidence-based recommendations regarding interventional management strategies in this patient cohort are scarce. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the impact of routine invasive vs. conservative management of NSTEACS by using individual patient data (IPD) from all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including older patients. MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched between 1 January 2010 and 11 September 2023. RCTs investigating routine invasive and conservative strategies in persons >70 years old with NSTEACS were included. Observational studies or trials involving populations outside the target range were excluded. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction (MI) at 1 year. One-stage IPD meta-analyses were adopted by use of random-effects and fixed-effect Cox models. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023379819). Six eligible studies were identified including 1479 participants. The primary endpoint occurred in 181 of 736 (24.5%) participants in the invasive management group compared with 215 of 743 (28.9%) participants in the conservative management group with a hazard ratio (HR) from random-effects model of 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-1.22; P = .43). The hazard for MI at 1 year was significantly lower in the invasive group compared with the conservative group (HR from random-effects model 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87; P = .006). Similar results were seen for urgent revascularization (HR from random-effects model 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P = .037). There was no significant difference in mortality. No evidence was found that routine invasive treatment for NSTEACS in older patients reduces the risk of a composite of all-cause mortality and MI within 1 year compared with conservative management. However, there is convincing evidence that invasive treatment significantly lowers the risk of repeat MI or urgent revascularisation. Further evidence is needed from ongoing larger clinical trials.

Impact of TIMI Risk Stratification on In-Hospital Mortality in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome: Perspectives from a Coronary Intervention Facility

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses a range of conditions, including non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), which is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Risk stratification is essential for guiding management strategies to improve patient outcomes. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score is a validated tool for predicting mortality in NSTEMI patients, yet its applicability in South Asian populations requires further investigation. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the association of the TIMI risk score with in-hospital mortality among NSTEMI patients in a tertiary care cardiac center and to assess the relevance of the TIMI score as a prognostic tool in a South Asian context. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 126 patients presenting with NSTEMI at the National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, Karachi. Data were collected from June 2012 to June 2013 after the institutional review board's approval. Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 to 85 with a TIMI score ≥5, while exclusion criteria were refusal to consent and a history of cardiac surgery. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and in-hospital outcomes were analyzed using SPSS version 25, employing Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical data, with a significance level set at p≤0.05. Results: The study found that 52 (41.3%) patients had diabetes mellitus, and 78 (61.9%) suffered from hypertension. A positive family history of coronary artery disease was observed in 29 (23.0%) patients. Among participants, 42 (33.3%) were smokers. The in-hospital mortality rate was 14.3%. No significant differences were noted in mortality regarding demographic and clinical variables. Conclusion: Elevated TIMI scores in NSTEMI patients are associated with significant in-hospital mortality. The findings underscore the importance of the TIMI risk score as a predictor of short-term outcomes in a South Asian population. The study highlights the need for further validation of the TIMI score in diverse populations and the optimization of risk stratification tools.

MINOCA and Coronary Ectasia: a rare combination of causes of infarction

to describe a patient with myocardial ischemia with multiple causes. This clinical case describes a 58-year-old man with a history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, COPD and previous myocardial infarction (AMI). He went to the emergency room with chest pain and dyspnea. Findings included bibasal crackles, electrocardiogram with old anterior fibrosis, elevated NT-ProBNP, and echocardiogram with septoapical akinesia. During hospitalization, he experienced tachyarrhythmia and hemodynamic deterioration, undergoing electrical cardioversion (CVE). Non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) complicated with ventricular arrhythmia and acute pulmonary edema was diagnosed. Coronary angiography revealed coronary ectasias without obstructive lesions, but with mild stenosis in three vessels. The patient was successfully treated with non-invasive ventilation, diuretics, vasodilators and anticoagulation. The discharge was granted with the plan to further studies to optimize and guide treatment and finally the diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Arteries (MINOCA) and the presence of coronary ectasias was addressed. it is important to highlight the non-ischemic causes in MINOCA and the association between coronary ectasia and cardiovascular events, which is why we emphasize the need for more studies to better understand the relationship between these phenomena.

The Evolving Field of Acute Coronary Syndrome Management: A Critical Appraisal of the 2023 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS), encompassing conditions like ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), represent a significant challenge in cardiovascular care due to their complex pathophysiology and substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for ACS management introduce several updates in key areas such as invasive treatment timing in NSTE-ACS, pre-treatment strategies, approaches to multivessel disease, and the use of imaging modalities including computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intracoronary imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). They also address a modulation of antiplatelet therapy, taking into consideration different patient risk profiles, and introduce new recommendations for low-dose colchicine. These guidelines provide important evidence-based updates in practice, reflecting an evolution in the understanding and management of ACS, yet some potentially missed opportunities for more personalized care and technology adoption are discussed.

Occurrence of Transient Myocardial Ischemic Events among Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Before or After Invasive Coronary Angiography.

The occurrence of transient myocardial ischemia (TMI) is an important pathology in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), yet studies are scarce regarding when TMI occurs during hospitalization, particularly in relation to invasive coronary angiography (ICA). This study examined: (1) TMI before or after ICA; (2) patient characteristics and ischemic burden by TMI group (before or after ICA); and (3) major in-hospital complications (transfer to critical care, death) and length of stay (LOS) by TMI group (before or after ICA). Secondary data analysis in hospitalized NSTE-ACS patients with TMI event(s) identified from 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) Holter. Patient records were reviewed to assess ischemic burden (TMI time [minutes] ÷ hours recording duration), outcomes and TMI timing, before or after ICA. In 38 patients, 3 (8%) had TMI before and after ICA. Of the remaining 35 patients (92%), TMI occurred before ICA (16; 46%), and after ICA (9; 26%), and 10 (28%) did not have ICA. Patient characteristics, untoward outcomes, and TMI duration (minutes) did not differ by group. Ischemic burden was higher in patients with TMI after ICA (7.29±8.82 min/hr) compared to before ICA (2.54±2.11 min/hr), p=0.039. Hospital LOS by TMI group was 113±113 (before), 226±244 (after), and 85±65 hr (no ICA); p=0.172. Almost half of the sample had TMI before ICA; one-third had TMI but did not have ICA. Patients with TMI after an ICA had higher ischemic burden. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate further the short- and long-term clinical significance of TMI among NSTE-ACS patients.

The impact of patient-reported frailty on cardiovascular outcomes in elderly patients after non-ST-acute coronary syndrome

BackgroundAs life expectancy increases, the population of older individuals with coronary artery disease and frailty is growing. We aimed to assess the impact of patient-reported frailty on the treatment and prognosis of elderly early survivors of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). MethodsFrailty data were obtained from two prospective trials, POPular Age and the POPular Age Registry, which both assessed elderly NSTE-ACS patients. Frailty was assessed one month after admission with the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) and was defined as a GFI-score of 4 or higher. In these early survivors of NSTE-ACS, we assessed differences in treatment and 1-year outcomes between frail and non-frail patients, considering major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and major bleeding. ResultsThe total study population consisted of 2192 NSTE-ACS patients, aged ≥70 years. The GFI-score was available in 1320 patients (79 ± 5 years, 37% women), of whom 712 (54%) were considered frail. Frail patients were at higher risk for MACE than non-frail patients (9.7% vs. 5.1%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–2.43, p = 0.04), but not for major bleeding (3.7% vs. 2.8%, adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.65–2.32, p = 0.53). Cubic spline analysis showed a gradual increase of the risk for clinical outcomes with higher GFI-scores. ConclusionsIn elderly NSTE-ACS patients who survived 1-month follow-up, patient-reported frailty was independently associated with a higher risk for 1-year MACE, but not with major bleeding. These findings emphasize the importance of frailty screening for risk stratification in elderly NSTE-ACS patients.

Non-invasive vascular measures as prognostic predictors for older patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Adverse cardiac events are common in older patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS), yet prognostic predictors are still lacking. This study investigated the long-term prognostic significance of non-invasive measures including endothelial function, carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), and vascular stiffness in older NSTEACS patients referred for invasive treatment. NSTEACS patients aged 75 years and older recruited to a multicentre cohort study (NCT01933581) were assessed for baseline endothelial function using endoPAT logarithm of reactive hyperemia index (LnRHI), CIMT using B-mode ultrasound, and vascular stiffness using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV). Long-term outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death, reinfarction, urgent revascularization, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and significant bleeding. Recruitment resulted in 214 patients assessed for LnRHI, 190 patients assessed for CIMT and 245 patients assessed for cfPWV. For LnRHI group (median follow-up 4.73 years [IQR: 1.41-5.00]), Cox regression analysis revealed a trend towards increased risk of MACE (HR: 1.24 [95% CI: 0.80-1.93]; P = 0.328) and mortality (HR: 1.49 [95% CI: 0.86-2.59]; P = 0.157), but no significance was reached. No difference for other components of MACE was found. For CIMT group (median follow up 4.74 years [IQR: 1.55-5.00]), no statistically significant difference in MACE was found (HR: 0.92 [95% CI: 0.53-1.59]; P = 0.754). Similarly, for cfPWV group (median follow-up 4.96 years [IQR: 1.55-5.00]), results did not support prognostic significance (for MACE, HR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.65-1.39]; P = 0.794). Endothelial function, CIMT and vascular stiffness were proven unsuitable as strong prognostic predictors in older patients with NSTEACS. NCT01933581.

Can prolonged P-R interval predict clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients?

BackgroundThe present study aimed to respond to clinical question, can prolonged P-R interval predict clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients?MethodsThis descriptive-analytical study was conducted on cardiac patients. All of the non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) including non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and unstable angina patients included in the study. Then they divided into two groups: prolonged P-R interval and normal P-R interval. The patients who had a history of digoxin and calcium channel blocker use, using antiarrhythmic drugs, known valvular or congenital heart disease and connective tissue, unreadable P-R interval and cardiac block were excluded. Data were collected using the questionnaire consisted demographic data and clinical outcomes and a follow-up part was completed by one of the researchers.ResultsFinally, 248 patients completed the study. The results showed both of the two groups had significant differences in terms of the history of myocardial infarction (MI) (p = 0.018), the level of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (p = 0.004), heart rate (p = 0.042), inverted T wave (p = 0.017), anterior ST- segment depression (p = 0.008), normal report of coronary angiography (CAG) (p = 0.003), three vessels disease (p = 0.043), left main lesion (p = 0.045) and SYNTAX score (p = 0.032) based on the CAG report. The results of six-month follow-up showed although, the frequency of ischemic stroke, coronary artery disease (CAD) and cardiovascular death were higher in prolonged P-R interval groups. The chi-square test showed this difference was statistically non-significant (p > 0.05). The multivariate logistic regression model revealed non-significant relationships between prolonged P-R interval and SYNTAX score, significant CAD, three-vessel disease, inverted T wave, anterior ST depression, heart rate and HDL.ConclusionsBased on the results of our study the six-month follow-up showed non-significant outcomes. Further studies are recommended to assess the long-term outcomes.

Computed tomography angiography or invasive coronary angiography in patients with lowto intermediate risk acute coronary syndrome — a single-center study

Aim. To evaluate the strategy of using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with low-to-intermediate risk of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in relation to early (in-hospital) and long-term prognosis in comparison with standard management tactics.Material and methods. The study included 259 patients (men (M), 47,9%, mean age, 62,2±9,4 years). Patients in group 1 (n=148 people, M 46,6%, mean age 61,99±9,92 years) underwent CCTA to assess coronary involvement, and patients in group 2 (n=111 people, M 49,5%, mean age 62,4±8,6 years) — invasive coronary angiography (ICA). The follow-up lasted 18 months.Results. Patients in both groups were comparable in age, concomitant chronic diseases and smoking. Patients in the CCTA group compared with the ICA group had lower GRACE score and lower values of high-sensitivity Troponin I. In 85 patients (57,4%) of group 1 there was no coronary involvement, while 41 patients (27,7%) had <50% stenosis, 22 patients (14,9%) — >50% stenosis in at least one coronary artery. In group 2, the majority of patients also had non-involved coronary vessels (n=76; 68,5%), while hemodynamically insignificant (20-40%) and significant lesions were detected in 20 patients (12,3%) and 15 people (13,5%), respectively. In group 1, 20 patients were referred for ICA as follows: 10 patients underwent percutaneous coronary interventions; 2 patients had multivessel disease; in 4 patients, intraoperative fractional flow reserve revealed hemodynamically insignificant stenoses; in 4 remaining patients, no significant lesions were detected. All-cause mortality was 4,05% in the CCTA group, and 7,2% in the ICA group (p=0,28). In the CCTA group, cardiovascular mortality was 0%, and in the ICA group — 0,9% (p=0,43).Conclusion. CCTA in patients with low-to-intermediate risk ACS is not inferior to the standard tactics for managing these patients and significantly reduces the need for iCAG.

Myocardial infarction in a young woman without cardiovascular risk factors: a case report

Myocardial infarction usually occurs in people over 50 years of age, but younger patients can also be affected. The article presents a case of a young patient, 34 years old, who was admitted to the cardiology department with a diagnosis of lowrisk non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. The patient complained of anginal pain that occurred for the first time. However, she did not have typical risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Coronary angiography showed a critical stenosis of 99% in the proximal third of the 2nd segment of the right coronary artery. A case clearly demonstrates the importance of a thorough examination of young patients with complaints of chest pain, which is often mistakenly interpreted as a pathology of other organs and systems other than the cardiovascular one. No risk factors in a patient does not guarantee low risk of myocardial infarction, and a detailed examination of the patient will help to avoid underdiagnosis of acute coronary syndrome.

Outcomes of management strategies in patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting presenting with an acute coronary syndrome

BackgroundPatients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have poor outcomes and the optimal treatment strategy for this population is unknown. MethodsUsing linked administrative databases, we examined patients with an ACS between 2008 and 2019, identifying patients with prior CABG. Patients were categorized by ACS presentation type and treatment strategy. Our primary outcome was the composite of death and recurrent myocardial infarction at one year. ResultsOf 54,641 patients who presented with an ACS, 1670 (3.1%) had a history of prior CABG. Of those, 11.0% presented with an ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) of which, 15.3% were treated medically, 31.1% underwent angiography but were treated medically, 22.4% with fibrinolytic therapy and 31.1% with primary PCI. The primary outcome rate was the highest (36.8%) in patients who did not undergo angiography and was similar in the primary PCI (20.8%) and fibrinolytic group (21.9%). In patients presenting with a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) (89.0%), 33.2% were treated medically, 38.5% underwent angiography but were treated medically and 28.2% were treated with PCI. Compared to those who underwent PCI, patients treated conservatively demonstrated a higher risk of the composite outcome (14.8% vs 27.3%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.70, 95% confidence interval 1.22–2.37). ConclusionsPatients with prior CABG presenting with an ACS are often treated conservatively without PCI, which is associated with a higher risk of adverse events.

Temporal biomarker concentration patterns during the early course of acute coronary syndrome.

Biomarker concentrations and their changes during acute coronary syndrome (ACS) provide clinically useful information on pathophysiological processes, e.g. myocardial necrosis, hemodynamic stress and inflammation. However, current evidence on temporal biomarker patterns early during ACS is limited, and studies investigating multiple biomarkers are lacking. We measured concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI), NT-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) in plasma samples obtained at randomization in ACS patients from the PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Linear regressions with interaction analyses were used to investigate the associations of biomarker concentrations with the time from symptom onset and to model temporal biomarker concentration patterns. The study population consisted of 16,944 patients (median age 62 years; 71.3 % males) with 6,853 (40.3 %) having ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 10,141 (59.7 %) having non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Concentrations of all biomarkers were associated with time from symptom onset (pinteraction<0.001), apart for GDF-15 (pinteraction=0.092). Concentration increases were more pronounced in STEMI compared to NSTE-ACS. Temporal biomarker patterns for hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI were different depending on sex whereas biomarker patterns for the other biomarkers were similar in cohorts defined by age and sex. Temporal concentration patterns differ for various biomarkers early during ACS, reflecting the variability in the activation and duration of different pathophysiological processes, and the amount of injured myocardium. Our data emphasize that the time elapsed from symptom onset should be considered for the interpretation of biomarker results in ACS.

The possible utility of global longitudinal strain in the risk-stratifying process of non-ST elevation-acute coronary syndrome.

There are various ways that coronary artery disease (CAD) might present itself. Individual risk stratification for non ST-elevation-acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients should determine whether invasive coronary angiography and revascularization should be scheduled. To assess the possible utility of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in the risk-stratifying process of NSTE-ACS. The cardiology department of Zagazig University in Egypt organized and oversaw this cross-sectional study. The practical portion was carried out on 90 patients with NSTE-ACS based on European society of cardiology (ESC) guidelines (and they agreed for invasive strategy) between May 2019 and December 2020 at Salalah Heart Center in Sultanate of Oman. All patients underwent a full clinical examination, 12-lead ECG, and serial high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) in addition to a thorough history taking process. On patient's admission, the GRACE risk score was assessed. All patients who were suspected of having NSTE-ACS upon admission underwent transthoracic echocardiography, including two-dimensional speckle tracking (2D-ST). Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS %) was measured and analyzed using 2D speckle tracking. SYNTAX Score was determined for all patients. By analysis of the performance of LV-GLS% in prediction of high risk by GRACE score, we found that with cutoff (≥-13.8), the AUC was (0.944) with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy (0.944, 93.3%, 84%, 53.8%, 98.4%, 85.6%), respectively. Global longitudinal strain can predict accurately high-risk NSTE-ACS patients by GRACE score.

Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio Value as a Predictor of Troponin Elevation in Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a prominent contributor to mortality and morbidity on a global scale, consistently ranking within the top five primary causes. Inflammation is one of the many elements that have a role in the pathophysiology of the development and destabilization of plaque atherosclerosis in ACS. Troponin is a component of a biomarker that signals damage to the heart muscle in ACS patients; however, at the present time, not all medical facilities are able to perform troponin testing. An acute myocardial infarction begins with an initial inflammatory process that generates proinflammatory cytokines at the cellular level. This can be evaluated by the NLR through peripheral blood tests. The NLR as an indication of systemic inflammation has been demonstrated to be associated with poor clinical outcomes, an increased risk of complications, and mortality in ACS patients. In addition, several studies showed that the NLR has prognostic value in patients with ACS. The NLR is a mix of inflammatory markers, which can be a predictor of increased troponin in cases of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) in an emergency room.

A comprehensive guide on the optimal timing of PCI in the setting of acute coronary syndrome: An updated meta-analysis

BackgroundInvasive revascularization is recommended for cohorts of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). However, the optimal timing of invasive revascularization is still controversial and no defined consensus is established. We aim to give a comprehensive appraisal on the optimal timing of invasive strategy in the heterogenous population of ACS. MethodsRelevant studies were assessed through PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, and Cochrane Library from inception until April 2023. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and all-cause mortality were our primary outcomes of interest, other secondary outcomes were cardiac death, TVR, MI, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemia, and major bleeding. The data was pooled as odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random effect model using STATA 17 MP. ResultsA total of 26 studies comprising 21,443 patients were included in the analysis. Early intervention was favor to decrease all-cause mortality (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.64 to 0.98, p = 0.03), when compared to delayed intervention. Subgroup analysis showed that early intervention was significantly associated with all-cause mortality reduction in only NSTE-ACS (OR = 0.83, 95% CI [0.7 to 0.99], p = 0.04). However, there was no significant difference between early and delayed intervention in terms of MACE, cardiac death, TVR, MI, repeat revascularization, recurrent ischemia, and major bleeding. ConclusionAn early intervention was associated with lower mortality rates compared to delayed intervention in NSTE-ACS with no significant difference in other clinical outcomes.PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415574.

Is having a moderate or low history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk score a handicap for long-term mortality?

History, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk score and troponin level follow-up are used to safely discharge low-risk patients with suspected non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome from the emergency department for a 1-month period. We aimed to comprehensively investigate the 6-month mortality of patients with the history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk score. A total of 949 non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome patients admitted to the emergency department from 01.01.2019 to 01.10.2019 were included in this retrospective study. History, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin scores of all patients were calculated by two emergency clinicians and a cardiologist. We compared the 6-month mortality of the groups. The mean age of the patients was 67.9 (56.4-79) years; 57.3% were male and 42.7% were female. Six-month mortality was significantly lower in the high-risk history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin score group than in the low- and moderate-risk groups: 11/80 (12.1%), 58/206 (22%), and 150/444 (25.3%), respectively (p=0.019). Patients with high history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin risk scores are generally treated with coronary angioplasty as soon as possible. We found that the mortality rate of this group of patients was lower in the long term compared with others. Efforts are also needed to reduce the mortality of moderate and low-risk patients. Further studies are needed on the factors affecting the 6-month mortality of moderate and low-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.

Magnesium bioresorbable scaffold (Magmaris) versus polymer biodegradable ultrathin drug-eluting stent (Ultimaster) in acute coronary syndrome. Mid-term outcomes (2 years).

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a well-known risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, evaluation of coronary stents in this challenging clinical scenario can provide unique information on device safety and efficacy. Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) were designed to overcome long-term complications related to permanent vessel caging with a permanent metallic drug-eluting stent (DES). We designed this study to evaluate the mid-term safety and efficiency of the Magmaris BRS in comparison to the leading new-generation ultrathin DES Ultimaster in the ACS population. We present a retrospective analysis of 2-year follow-up data. The primary outcomes consisted of death from cardiac causes, myocardial infarction, and in-stent thrombosis. The second main study endpoint was defined as target-lesion failure (TLF). The study population consisted of two cohorts, the first of 193 patients treated with Magmaris implantation and the second of 169 patients treated with Ultimaster implantation. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in both study cohorts in terms of primary outcome (5.1% vs. 11%; p = 0.051), and TLF (5.6% vs. 8%, p = 0.41). Treatment with a second-generation BRS (Magmaris) versus a novel second-generation DES (Ultimaster) in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) was associated with similar rates of target lesion failure at 2-year follow-up.

Retrospective review of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome presenting to the emergency department of a major tertiary center in Saudi Arabia.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) comprises a spectrum of diseases ranging from unstable angina (UA), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Treatment of ACS without STEMI (NSTEMI-ACS) can vary, depending on the severity of presentation and multiple other factors. Analyze the NSTEMI-ACS patients in our institution. Retrospective observational. A tertiary care institution with accredited chest pain center. The travel time from ED booking to the final disposition for patients presenting with chest pain was retrieved over a period of 6 months. The duration of each phase of management was measured with a view to identify the factors that influence their management and time from the ED to their final destination. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Travel time from ED to final destination. 300 patients. The majority of patients were males (64%) between 61 and 80 years of age (45%). The median disposition time (from ED booking to admission order by the cardiology team) was 5 hours and 19 minutes. Cardiology admissions took 10 hours and 20 minutes from ED booking to the inpatient bed. UA was diagnosed in 153 (51%) patients and non-STEMI in 52 (17%). Coronary catheterization was required in 79 (26%) patients, 24 (8%) had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and 8 (3%) had both catheterization and CABG. The time from ED booking to final destination for NSTEMI-ACS patients is delayed due to multiple factors, which caused significant delays in overall management. Additional interventional steps can help improve the travel times, diagnosis, management and disposition of these patients. Single center study done in a tertiary care center so the results from this study may not be extrapolated to other centers.