Nonspecific Motor Disorder Research Articles

Automated impedance‐manometry analysis detects esophageal motor dysfunction in patients who have non‐obstructive dysphagia with normal manometry

Automated integrated analysis of impedance and pressure signals has been reported to identify patients at risk of developing dysphagia post fundoplication. This study aimed to investigate this analysis in the evaluation of patients with non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD) and normal manometry (NOD/NM). Combined impedance-manometry was performed in 42 patients (27F : 15M; 56.2 ± 5.1 years) and compared with that of 24 healthy subjects (8F : 16M; 48.2 ± 2.9 years). Both liquid and viscous boluses were tested. MATLAB-based algorithms defined the median intrabolus pressure (IBP), IBP slope, peak pressure (PP), and timing of bolus flow relative to peak pressure (TNadImp-PP). An index of pressure and flow (PFI) in the distal esophagus was derived from these variables. Diagnoses based on conventional manometric assessment: diffuse spasm (n = 5), non-specific motor disorders (n = 19), and normal (n = 11). Patients with achalasia (n = 7) were excluded from automated impedance-manometry (AIM) analysis. Only 2/11 (18%) patients with NOD/NM had evidence of flow abnormality on conventional impedance analysis. Several variables derived by integrated impedance-pressure analysis were significantly different in patients as compared with healthy: higher PNadImp (P < 0.01), IBP (P < 0.01) and IBP slope (P < 0.05), and shorter TNadImp_PP (P = 0.01). The PFI of NOD/NM patients was significantly higher than that in healthy (liquid: 6.7 vs 1.2, P = 0.02; viscous: 27.1 vs 5.7, P < 0.001) and 9/11 NOD/NM patients had abnormal PFI. Overall, the addition of AIM analysis provided diagnoses and/or a plausible explanation in 95% (40/42) of patients who presented with NOD. Compared with conventional pressure-impedance assessment, integrated analysis is more sensitive in detecting subtle abnormalities in esophageal function in patients with NOD and normal manometry.

Hot Water Swallows May Improve Symptoms in Patients With Achalasia

Cold water swallows may provoke dysphagia or chest pain in some patients with esophageal motility disorders. In contrast, hot water swallows may improve esophageal symptoms. Actually, some patients with esophageal motility disorders experience that their esophageal symptoms tend to improve after drinking hot water. In 1998, Triadafilopoulos et al1 published the first study on the clinical and therapeutic effects of hot water ingestion in patients with esophageal motility disorders including achalasia. They investigated the effects of hot water swallow on esophageal symptoms using conventional esophageal manometry and esophageal scintigraphy in 48 men and women with intermittent dysphagia to both solids and liquids, chest pain and/or regurgitation. Clinically, 28 (58%) of 48 patients presented significant improvement of their symptoms after ingesting hot water. Esophageal clearance was accelerated, and the amplitude and duration of esophageal body contractions were decreased by drinking hot water in patients with esophageal motility disorders, from mild non-specific motor disorders to diffuse esophageal spasm and achalasia. These findings may suggest this simple and safe manuever can be applicable in patients with esophageal motility disorders.

Achalasia With Dense Eosinophilic Infiltrate Responds to Steroid Therapy

A patient presented with chronic substernal discomfort and intermittent dysphagia for solids. High-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) of the esophagus showed that there was no peristalsis in the esophageal body but incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and incomplete bolus transit, so the patient was diagnosed with achalasia. Moreover, probably because of esophageal stasis, eosinophilic infiltration that mimicked a pattern of eosinophilic esophagitis was observed, on the basis of multiple biopsies of the esophagus. The patient was given 50 mg prednisolone once daily; the symptoms improved dramatically, and HRIM showed complete recovery of esophageal peristalsis, deeper relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter, and complete bolus transit profile. HRIM can therefore be used to assess dysmotility abnormalities in patients with achalasia and eosinophilic-like esophagitis, and steroids relieve these symptoms. Treatment with a high dose of prednisolone resulted in a complete disappearance of dysphagia because of improved esophageal motility and reduced eosinophilic infiltrate. It is therefore important to control the inflammatory process in patients with idiopathic achalasia, which is likely to result from an autoimmune reaction.

Age and gender affect likely manometric diagnosis: Audit of a tertiary referral hospital clinical esophageal manometry service

Awareness of patient demographics, common diagnoses and associations between these may improve the use and interpretation of manometric investigations. The aim of the present study therefore was to determine whether age and/or gender affect manometric diagnosis in a clinical motility service. An audit of all 452 clinical manometry reports issued from December 2003 to July 2005 with respect to age, gender and diagnosis was carried out. Patients were divided by age (17-24 years n = 14, 25-44 years n = 87, 45-64 years n = 216 and >or=65 years n = 135), and gender and data compared using contingency tables. Women were more commonly referred overall (59%) and in each age bracket except <25 years (64% male). Men were more likely to have 'hypotensive' motor problems P = 0.01. With aging, normal motor function became less common (P = 0.013), with non-specific motor disorder, ineffective/hypotensive peristalsis and 'achalasia-like' conditions each more common (individual P = NS). Increasing age showed a trend for increased spastic motor disorders (P = 0.06). Gender did not, however, influence whether motility was abnormal (P = 0.5), spastic (P = 0.7) or whether a non-specific motor disorder was present (P = 0.1). In the total cohort, the principal manometric diagnoses were: non-specific motor disorder 33%, normal motility 29%, low basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure 18%, hypotensive/ineffective peristalsis 10%, achalasia/achalasia-like 6%, diffuse esophageal spasm 3% and other 1%. Aging leads to increasing esophageal motor abnormalities. Men and women have similar rates of dysfunction, although 'low-pressure problems' were more common in men.

Esophageal manometric characteristics and outcomes for laparoscopic esophageal diverticulectomy, myotomy, and partial fundoplication for epiphrenic diverticula

The purpose of this study is to characterize the esophageal motor and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) abnormalities associated with epiphrenic esophageal diverticula and analyze outcomes for laparoscopic esophageal diverticulectomy, myotomy, and partial fundoplication. The endoscopic, radiographic, manometric, and perioperative records for patients undergoing laparoscopic esophageal diverticulectomy, anterior esophageal myotomy, and partial fundoplication from 8/99 until 9/06 were reviewed from an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved outcomes database. Data are given as mean +/- standard deviation (SD). An esophageal body motor disorder and/or LES abnormalities were present in 11 patients with epiphrenic diverticula; three patients were characterized as achalasia, one had vigorous achalasia, two had diffuse esophageal spasm, and five had a nonspecific motor disorder. Presenting symptoms included dysphagia (13/13), regurgitation (7/13), and chest pain (4/13). Three patients had previous Botox injections and three patients had esophageal dilatations. Laparoscopic epiphrenic diverticulectomy with an anterior esophageal myotomy was completed in 13 patients (M:F; 3:10) with a mean age of 67.6 +/- 4.2 years, body mass index (BMI) of 28.1 +/- 1.9 kg/m2 and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 2.2 +/- 0.1. Partial fundoplication was performed in 12/13 patients (Dor, n = 2; Toupet, n = 10). Four patients had a type I and one patient had a type III hiatal hernia requiring repair. Mean operative time was 210 +/- 15.1 min and mean length of stay (LOS) was 2.8 +/- 0.4 days. Two grade II or higher complications occurred, including one patient who was readmitted on postoperative day 4 with a leak requiring a thoracotomy. After a mean follow-up of 13.6 +/- 3.0 months (range 3-36 months), two patients complained of mild solid food dysphagia and one patient required proton pump inhibitor (PPI) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. The majority of patients with epiphrenic esophageal diverticula have esophageal body motor disorders and/or LES abnormalities. Laparoscopic esophageal diverticulectomy and anterior esophageal myotomy with partial fundoplication is an appropriate alternative with acceptable short-term outcomes in symptomatic patients.

Manometric findings in adult eosinophilic oesophagitis: a study of 12 cases

To describe the manometric findings detected in adult patients with dysphagia that were diagnosed of eosinophilic oesophagitis, and to compare with the cases of eosinophilic infiltration of the oesophagus reported in the literature. We present 12 adult patients diagnosed as suffering from this disorder in our department in a 1.5-year period, according to histological criteria and discarding any other cause of eosinophilic infiltration of the oesophagus. Stationary oesophageal manometry using a hydropneumocapillary perfusion system was performed in every case. The recommendations of the Spanish Group of Digestive Motility were followed for the interpretation of the results. In seven patients who presented motor disorder in manometric evaluation, treatment with steroid oesophageal lavage using fluticasone propionate was carried out and these patients were subsequently re-evaluated. All patients were young predominantly men, and the first endoscopic examination showed regular concentric stenosis or a 'ring oesophagus'. Six patients had a severe nonspecific oesophageal motor disorder characterized by up to 80% of nontransmitted or very low-amplitude waves in the lower two-thirds of the organ. Three patients presented a manometric disturbance characterized by hyperkinetic peristaltic waves in distal oesophageal third. One patient had an alteration of the oesophageal motor dynamics characterized by 80% of deglutory complexes formed by a primary simultaneous wave in the two lower oesophageal thirds followed by a secondary peristaltic wave in 50% of cases that had a normal duration and amplitude. The remaining two patients had normal oesophageal motility. The upper oesophageal sphincter showed no alterations, and the manometric evaluation of the lower oesophageal sphincter tone proved normal in 10 patients, with slight hypotension in two cases. In seven of the nine patients who presented an oesophageal motor disorder, treatment with steroid oesophageal lavage using fluticasone propionate was administered and a new oesophageal manometry was performed afterwards, in which the motor disorder was clearly improved as soon as dysphagia, endoscopic lesions and histopathologic alteration disappeared. In the literature, 61 cases of eosinophilic infiltration of the oesophageal mucosa subjected to oesophageal manometric study had been described, and 60.6% of them showed evidence of different types of manometric alterations, mainly with spastic or hypercontractility characteristics. Although six of our cases showed very deficient peristalsis with very low-amplitude or nontransmitted waves, and in another three high-amplitude peristaltic waves were recorded. Motor disorders improved parallel to the disappearance of the eosinophilic infiltration of the mucosa. These data suggest that motor disorders in eosinophilic oesophagitis are a consequence of eosinophil infiltration of the oesophagus and should be considered in the differential diagnosis of dysphagia. These manometric alterations could be considered as primary nonspecific disorders and included in the 'ineffective oesophageal motility' group.

Esophageal Ultrasonography: A New View on Esophageal Motility

Esophageal manometry has long been the gold standard for assessment of esophageal motility. Recently, high-frequency intraluminal ultrasonography (HFIUS) has been introduced to measure esophageal contractility and the thickness of esophageal muscle. Greater esophageal muscle thickness has been reported in patients with achalasia, diffuse spasm, and hypertensive peristalsis. In this issue of the Journal, Mittal and colleagues report additional observations in patients with esophageal symptoms referred for esophageal manometry. Their findings confirm earlier observations in patients with spastic motor disorders and report new findings of greater muscle thickness in patients with nonspecific motor disorders as well as normal manometry. Greater muscle thickness was associated with a greater prevalence of dysphagia suggesting the possibility that symptoms may be related, at least in part, to alterations in the biomechanics of the esophagus. The place of HFIUS in the assessment of esophageal function remains to be determined, but it offers the possibility of greater insights into esophageal physiology as well as clinical esophageal motor disorders.

Non-specific motor disorders of the esophagus: a primary motility disorder

Non-specific motor disorders of the esophagus: a primary motility disorder

Recent developments in gastrointestinal motility

In the past decade, the results of many studies on gastrointestinal motility and perception have been published that may be relevant to the clinician. A new classification of oesophageal motor disorders has been proposed in which “ineffective oesophageal motility” largely replaces the former “non-specific oesophageal motor disorders”. Recent studies have shown that the incidence of transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations can be reduced pharmacologically, and this may open doors to a new therapeutic approach in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The mechanisms through which hiatus hernia promotes reflux have become clearer. The recently developed technique of intraluminal impedance monitoring has made it possible to study oesophageal transit, non-acid reflux and its role in the generation of reflux symptoms, as well as the characteristics of belching. Measurement of gastric emptying by means of a non-radioactive isotope and breath-testing has become widely available but, unfortunately, this development has not yet been accompanied by the advent of new therapeutic options for gastroparesis. The term “enteric dysmotility” has been coined for the condition in which upper abdominal symptoms are associated with distinct small intestinal bowel motility disorders in the absence of ileus-like episodes. The role of high-amplitude propagated contractions in the pathogenesis of constipation has been further defined. In cases of suspected sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, manometry of both sphincters (IBD and pancreatic) is now felt to be advisable.

Surgery improves defective oesophageal peristalsis in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux

Postoperative manometry was carried out in 12 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux associated with hypomotility of the oesophageal body. A Nissen fundoplication was carried out in all patients. After a median follow-up of 3.5 years, patients underwent clinical, endoscopic, radiological, manometric and pH-metric evaluation. Manometric results revealed an overall improvement in oesophageal motor function with an increase in the amplitude of deglutition waves and a decrease in the percentage of deglutitions without response. Six of the patients (one with complete motor failure) recovered normal peristaltic function. Non-specific oesophageal motor disorders may be secondary to gastro-oesophageal reflux and are reversible in nature.

Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults, an emerging cause of dysphagia: Description of 9 cases

Eosinophilic esophagitis is a rare condition mainly affecting children, although the number of cases reported in adults is on the increase. It is characterized by intense infiltration of eosinophilic leukocytes in the esophageal mucosa, without involvement of other sections of the alimentary canal. Over the past year, following the performance of endoscopies and biopsies, our service identified nine patients who were diagnosed with suffering from this disorder. Each patient sought medical help for episodes of long-term, self-limited dysphagia or food impaction in the alimentary canal. Endoscopy revealed esophageal stenosis in the form of simultaneous contraction rings or regular stenosis. In six cases, the manometric study showed a nonspecific motor disorder of severe intensity affecting the esophageal body, and another patient had a disorder characterized by the presence of simultaneous waves and secondary peristaltic waves in the three thirds of the organ. These disorders are presumably due to eosinophilic infiltration of the muscular layer or ganglionar cells of the esophagus, and account for symptoms in these patients. Although the etiopathogenesis of this illness is uncertain, it is clearly an immunoallergic manifestation. As the number of diagnosed cases is on the increase, eosinophilic esophagitis is in adults a specific entity within the differential diagnosis of dysphagia in young males with a history of allergies. Eosiniphilic esophagitis responds in a different number of ways to therapies used. We successfully used fluticasone propionate, a synthetic corticoid applied topically, which proved to be efficient in the treatment of this illness by acting on the pathophysiological basis of the process. It does not have any adverse effects, thus offering advantages over other therapies such as systematic corticoids or endoscopic dilations.

AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry

AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry

‘Efficacy’ of esophageal peristalsis: a manometric parameter to quantify esophageal body dysfunction

Esophageal motor abnormalities are currently categorized into separate entities based on standard manometry. The clinical significance of these categories is controversial. We evaluated whether ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility monitoring improves the assessment of patients thought to have a primary esophageal motor disorder. Standard and ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility records of 30 healthy volunteers and 136 symptomatic patients were compared. Regression analysis was used to identify parameters that relate to the presence of nonobstructive dysphagia. Prolonged ambulatory esophageal monitoring showed a marked circadian variation in the esophageal motor pattern and significant discrepancies to the findings on standard manometry in 47% of the 136 patients. Discrepancies were particularly frequent in patients categorized on standard manometry as having a 'nutcracker esophagus' or a nonspecific motor disorder. Of all data obtained, the prevalence of 'effective contractions', i.e. peristaltic contractions with an amplitude > 30 mmHg, during meal periods provided the best correlation with the presence of nonobstructive dysphagia. Of the 78 patients with nonobstructive dysphagia 71 (92%) had less than 50% of 'effective contractions' during meals. In five patients who had frequent simultaneous wave forms and less than 70%'effective contractions' during meals a long myotomy markedly reduced the severity of dysphagia. The 'efficacy' of esophageal contractions during meals best relates to patients' symptoms and allows expression of esophageal body dysfunction on a linear scale. This obviates the need for the current categories of esophageal motor disorders, permits an objective assessment of medical therapy and may improve the identification of patients that benefit from a surgical myotomy of the esophageal body.

Esophageal dysmotility and acid sensitivity in patients with mitral valve prolapse and chest pain.

Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) patients often experience non-cardiac chest pain. The aims of this study were to determine, in patients with non-cardiac chest pain: (i) whether esophageal dysmotility is more common in patients with MVP than in patients without MVP; and (ii) if acid sensitivity is an important cause of the chest pain in MVP patients. Esophageal manometry and acid perfusion testing were performed in 277 consecutive patients with non-cardiac chest pain. Patients with MVP (13 female, one male; mean age 49 years) were more likely (P = 0.01) to have esophageal dysmotility, while acid perfusion was less likely (P < 0.05) to provoke their chest pain, than in patients without MVP. The most common esophageal motor abnormalities detected in patients with and without MVP were diffuse esophageal spasm (prevalence, 57%) and non-specific motor disorder (prevalence, 9%), respectively. This study, the first large prospective series examining possible esophageal sensorimotor correlates of chest pain in MVP patients, demonstrates that in the absence of a cardiac cause for chest pain, a specific esophageal motility disorder should be excluded, rather than assuming the chest pain is likely to be due to acid sensitivity.

Relationship between esophageal muscle thickness and intraluminal pressure in patients with esophageal spasm.

We previously showed, in normal subjects, a positive correlation between the esophageal contraction amplitude and peak muscle thickness. The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between esophageal muscle thickness and contraction amplitude in patients with high-amplitude peristaltic and simultaneous contractions. Eleven patients with high-amplitude peristaltic contractions, 8 with diffuse esophageal spasm (DES), 7 with nonspecific (NS) motor disorder of the esophagus, and 10 normal subjects were studied using simultaneous pressure and ultrasound imaging. Pressure was recorded by manometry and ultrasound imaging with a high-frequency ultrasound probe catheter. Recordings were performed in the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 cm above the LES during resting state and swallow-induced contractions. Baseline esophageal muscle was thicker in the distal, compared with the proximal esophagus both in normal subjects and patient groups. Patients with DES and nutcracker esophagus (NC) have a higher baseline muscle thickness compared with normal and NS patients. Correlation between the peak pressure and the peak muscle thickness was weaker in patients with NC and DES compared with normal subjects and patients with NS. Whereas normal subjects have good correlation between delta (difference between peak and baseline) muscle thickness and peak pressures, this relationship was absent in patients with NC and DES. Increase in contraction amplitude in patients with NC and DES was associated with an increase in baseline thickness of esophageal muscularis propria. Increase in baseline thickness was specific to patients with spastic motor disorders and was not seen in patients with NS.

Physiologic basis for the treatment of epiphrenic diverticulum.

To quantitate and characterize the motility abnormalities present in patients with epiphrenic diverticula and to assess the outcome of surgical treatment undertaken according to these abnormalities. The concept that epiphrenic diverticula are complications of esophageal motility disorders rather than primary anatomic abnormalities is gradually becoming accepted. The inconsistency in identifying motility abnormalities in patients with epiphrenic diverticula is a major obstacle to the general acceptance of this concept. The study population consisted of 21 consecutive patients with epiphrenic diverticula. All patients underwent videoesophagography, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and esophageal motility studies. The diverticula ranged in size from 3 to 10 cm and were predominantly right-sided. Seventeen patients underwent transthoracic diverticulectomy or diverticulopexy with esophageal myotomy and an antireflux procedure. The length of the myotomy was determined by the extent of the motility abnormality. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in one patient with multiple diverticula. Two patients declined surgical treatment and another patient died of aspiration before surgery. Symptomatic outcome was assessed via a questionnaire at a median of 24 months after surgery. The primary symptoms were dysphagia in 5 (24%) patients, dysphagia and regurgitation in 11 (52%) patients, and pulmonary symptoms in 5 (24%) patients. The median duration of the primary symptoms was 10 years. Esophageal motility abnormalities were identified in all patients. An esophageal motor disorder was diagnosed only by 24-hour ambulatory motility testing in one patient, and 24-hour ambulatory motility testing clarified the motility diagnosis in five other patients. The most common underlying disorder was achalasia, which was detected in nine (43%) patients. A hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter was diagnosed in three patients, diffuse esophageal spasm in five, "nutcracker" esophagus in two, and a nonspecific motor disorder in two patients. One patient had an intraoperative myocardial infarction and died. Two patients had persistent mild dysphagia after surgery. The remaining patients had complete relief of their primary symptoms. There is a high prevalence of named motility disorders in patients with epiphrenic diverticula, and this condition is associated with the potential for lethal aspiration. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory motility testing can be helpful if the results of the stationary examination are normal or indefinite. Resection of the diverticula and a surgical myotomy of the manometrically defined abnormal segment results in relief of symptoms and protection from aspiration.

Chronic dysphagia following laparoscopic fundoplication.

Many surgeons practise tailored laparoscopic antireflux surgery in an attempt to prevent postoperative dysphagia. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of 360 degrees fundoplication (Nissen) or 270 degrees fundoplication (Toupet), and the influence of abnormal oesophageal peristalsis, upon postoperative dysphagia. This was a cohort study from three tertiary referral centres, using dysphagia before laparoscopic fundoplication and 1 year after operation as the main outcome variable. Preoperative oesophageal manometry was performed on all patients. Some 761 patients underwent Nissen and 85 underwent Toupet fundoplication. Only 2 per cent reported severe postoperative dysphagia. There was a significant selection bias towards the Toupet operation for patients with abnormal oesophageal motility (P < 0.001). For patients whose oesophageal manometric findings were normal there was a significant improvement in dysphagia after Nissen fundoplication (P = 0.02), and no significant change following Toupet fundoplication. There was no significant change in the rate of dysphagia following either method of fundoplication amongst other subgroups in which oesophageal manometry was stratified as non-specific motor disorder, low-amplitude peristalsis, or aperistalsis. A tailored approach to the degree of fundoplication is unnecessary as patients with dysmotility suffer no more dysphagia after full laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication than those who have a partial Toupet wrap.

Esophageal rings and strictures. Manometric characteristics in patients with food impaction.

The purpose was to investigate the manometric characteristics in patients with lower esophageal rings or strictures with special reference to food impaction. The material comprised 344 patients (158 female and 186 male). Lower esophageal rings or strictures were diagnosed radiologically by the full column technique. Manometry was performed with triple lumen catheters connected to a hydraulic capillary system and external transducers. Forty patients had rings, and 21 patients strictures. The reference group comprised 283 patients. Dysphagia was seen most frequently in patients with rings. Food impaction was seen only in patients with rings or strictures, whereas chest pain and heartburn appeared with the same incidence in all 3 groups. Non-specific motor disorders were seen most frequently in patients with strictures, but as delayed esophageal emptying with no influence on the tendency to food impaction. Only ring diameter, but not stricture diameter, was of any significance with a higher incidence of food impaction in patients with narrow rings. Radiology rather than manometry should be the first diagnostic step in patients with benign dysphagia suffering from food impaction.

ESOPHAGEAL RINGS AND STRICTURES. Manometric characteristics in patients with food impaction

The purpose was to investigate the manometric characteristics in patients with lower esophageal rings or strictures with special reference to food impaction. The material comprised 344 patients (158 female and 186 male). Lower esophageal rings or strictures were diagnosed radiologically by the full column technique. Manometry was performed with triple lumen catheters connected to a hydraulic capillary system and external transducers. Forty patients had rings, and 21 patients strictures. The reference group comprised 283 patients. Dysphagia was seen most frequently in patients with rings. Food impaction was seen only in patients with rings or strictures, whereas chest pain and heartburn appeared with the same incidence in all 3 groups. Non-specific motor disorders were seen most frequently in patients with strictures, but as delayed esophageal emptying with no influence on the tendency to food impaction. Only ring diameter, but not stricture diameter, was of any significance with a higher incidence of food impaction in patients with narrow rings. Radiology rather than manometry should be the first diagnostic step in patients with benign dysphagia suffering from food impaction.

3529 UNDERLYING ESOPHOGEAL PATHOLOGY IN MEAT IMPACTION.

Goal:To determine the underlying pathology responsible for dysphagia in patients who presented with meat impaction to Wilford Hall Medical Center and Brooke Army Medical Center(2 military hospitals in San Antonio, TX). Methods:All endoscopy and pathology reports from esophogeal meat impactions were reviewed retrospectively from a 3 year period. All repeat endoscopies and other studies were reviewed to determine an etiology for the meat impaction. Results: There were 70 meat impaction cases in the time period. 81.4%(57/70) had a repeat endoscopy performed and 22.9%(16/70) had biopsies taken. 71.4%(50/70) had dilation performed at index or subsequent endoscopy. A summary of underlying pathology is listed in table 1. Conclusions: At our two institutions, nearly 75% of all meat impactions were caused by either peptic strictures or esophogeal webs/rings. Another 20% of patients had no visible pathology on endoscopy. Rare causes noted included malignancy, a non-specific motor disorder, and recently banded varices. The data indicate nearly 95% of all meat impactions reveal common or no pathology at endoscopy. Goal:To determine the underlying pathology responsible for dysphagia in patients who presented with meat impaction to Wilford Hall Medical Center and Brooke Army Medical Center(2 military hospitals in San Antonio, TX). Methods:All endoscopy and pathology reports from esophogeal meat impactions were reviewed retrospectively from a 3 year period. All repeat endoscopies and other studies were reviewed to determine an etiology for the meat impaction. Results: There were 70 meat impaction cases in the time period. 81.4%(57/70) had a repeat endoscopy performed and 22.9%(16/70) had biopsies taken. 71.4%(50/70) had dilation performed at index or subsequent endoscopy. A summary of underlying pathology is listed in table 1. Conclusions: At our two institutions, nearly 75% of all meat impactions were caused by either peptic strictures or esophogeal webs/rings. Another 20% of patients had no visible pathology on endoscopy. Rare causes noted included malignancy, a non-specific motor disorder, and recently banded varices. The data indicate nearly 95% of all meat impactions reveal common or no pathology at endoscopy.