non-PORT Groups Research Articles

Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve survival in patients with Masaoka-Koga stage IIB thymomas: A propensity score matching study based on the SEER database.

This study, based on a population, explored the prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for Masaoka-Koga IIB stage thymomas. Patients diagnosed with thymoma from 2004 to 2017 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in the retrospective study. Through propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics of the patients were successfully matched to mitigate the selection bias of PORT. Survival rates and survival curves were compared between the PORT and non-PORT groups, with potential confounding factors addressed using a multivariate Cox regression model. In this study, 785 cases of IIB stage thymoma were included from the SEER database, and 303 patients were successfully matched between PORT and non-PORT groups through propensity score matching, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. In the PORT and non-PORT groups, 10-year overall survival rates were 65.2% versus 59.6%, and cancer-specific survival rates were 87.0% vs. 84.4%, PORT did not yield statistically significant improvements in overall survival (P = .275) or cancer-specific survival (P = .336) for stage IIB thymomas. Based on the SEER database, the results of our study indicated that PORT does not confer a significant survival benefit for IIB stage thymomas.

Efficacy of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Patients with New N2 Descriptors of Subclassification in Completely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Patients with N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were heterogeneous groups and required further stratification. The International Society for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) added new descriptors of three sub-stages for stage N2 NSCLC: N2 at a single station without N1 involvement (N2a1), N2 at a single station with N1 involvement (N2a2), and N2 at multiple stations (N2b). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with these N2 descriptors. Patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC after complete resection and divided into PORT group and non-PORT group. The primary endpoint was DFS. The second endpoints were overall survival (OS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) of baseline characteristics between the PORT and non-PORT groups was used for validation. Totally 1832 patients were enrolled, including 308 N2a1 patients, 682 N2a2 patients, and 842 N2b patients. The median follow-up time was 50.1 months. The survival outcomes of the PORT and non-PORT groups before PSM were shown in Table 1. For patients with N2a1, PORT could not improve the DFS (median DFS of the PORT group and the non-PORT group: not reached vs. 46.8 months, P = 0.41), OS (P = 0.85), or LRFS (P = 0.32), which were consistent with the multivariate analysis and data after the PSM. For patients with N2a2, PORT significantly improved the DFS (median DFS 29.7 vs. 22.2 months, P = 0.02), OS (P = 0.03), and LRFS (P = 0.01). The multivariate analysis and data after the PSM confirmed the benefits in DFS and LRFS, but no benefit was observed in OS (multivariate analysis: HR 0.79, P = 0.18; median OS after PSM: 103.7 vs. 63.1 months, P = 0.34). For patients with N2b, PORT could not improve the DFS (median DFS 20.6 vs. 21.2 months, P = 0.39) but significantly improved the OS (P<0.001) and LRFS (P<0.001). However, the multivariate analysis showed that PORT significantly improved DFS (HR 0.81, P = 0.03), consistent with the data after the PSM (median DFS 20.6 and 17.6 months, P = 0.04). PORT significantly improved the DFS and LRFS in patients with N2a2 and significantly improved the DFS, LRFS, and OS in patients with N2b. Patients with N2a1 could not benefit from PORT.

Effect of postoperative radiotherapy on survival in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for patients with completely resected stage N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been controversial. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PORT and prognosis in these patients. An updated meta-analysis was conducted in this study to investigate the efficacy of PORT and prognosis in patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Databases were searched up to 2 March 2022. All trials on patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC undergoing PORT were screened, and data indicators in the PORT and non-PORT groups were extracted, respectively. The effect of PORT on overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) was estimated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. In all, 20 studies involving 6340 patients were finally included. The PORT significantly increased OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.71-0.84, p < 0.001), LRFS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.52-0.76, p < 0.001), and DFS (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82, p < 0.001) while it showed no significant difference in improving DMFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.71-1.05, p = 0.14). Our results suggest that in the postoperative treatment of patients with completely resected and pathologically confirmed stage N2 NSCLC, the addition of PORT provides better local recurrence control and survival benefit, but no benefit for distant metastases. The PORT may be incorporated into the postoperative treatment options for some patients with high-risk factors. However, it needs to be validated by more prospective studies in the future. CRD42022314095.

Effect of Adjuvant Radiation Dose on Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background: For patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with surgery alone, the incidence of local-regional recurrence remains unfavorable. Postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) has been associated with increased local-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), although its application is limited by concerns of PORT-related toxicities. Methods: Among 3591 patients with ESCC analyzed in this study, 2765 patients with T3-4N0 and T1-4N1-3 lesions and specific local-regional status information were analyzed in a subsequent analysis of adjuvant radiation dose (aRTD) effect. Application of the restricted cubic spline regression model revealed a non-linear relationship between aRTD and survival/radiotoxicity. Linear regression analysis (LRA) was performed to evaluate correlations between LRFS and overall survival (OS)/ disease-free survival (DFS). Results: For patients staged T1−2N0, T1−2N1−3, T3−4N0, and T3−4N1−3, 5-year OS in PORT and non-PORT groups were 77.38% vs. 72.91%, p = 0.919, 52.35% vs. 46.60%, p = 0.032, 73.41% vs. 61.19%, p = 0.005 and 38.30% vs. 25.97%, p < 0.001. With aRTD escalation, hazard ratios (HRs) of OS/DFS declined until aRTD exceeded 50Gy, then increased, whereas that of LRFS declined until aRTD exceeded 50 Gy, then remained steady. HR of treatment-related mortality was stable until aRTD exceeded 50 Gy, then increased. LRA revealed strong correlations between LRFS and OS/DFS (r = 0.984 and r = 0.952, respectively). An absolute 1% advancement in LRFS resulted in 0.32% and 0.34% improvements in OS and DFS. Conclusions: An aRTD of 50Gy was well-tolerated, with favorable survival resulting from PORT-related LRFS improvement in patients staged T3−4N0 or T1-4N1−3. Further stratification analyses based on tumor burden would help determine potential PORT-beneficiaries.

The Prognostic Value of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Thymoma and Thymic Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Study Based on SEER Database.

Simple SummaryAlthough surgery has been recognized as the cornerstone of treatment for patients with resectable thymic epithelial tumors, the role of postoperative radiotherapy remains controversial. We performed this SEER-based propensity-matched analysis to investigate the prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy in thymoma and thymic carcinoma. The results showed that postoperative radiotherapy improved both overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with Masaoka-Koga stage IIB–IV thymoma. This study is the first to demonstrate the prognostic value of postoperative radiotherapy in stage IIB thymic carcinoma. This large, up-to-date population-based longitudinal study may provide guidance on the use of postoperative radiotherapy for a thymoma or thymic carcinoma.(1) Objectives: The effect of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for thymoma and thymic carcinoma remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of PORT for thymoma and thymic carcinoma in a population-based registry. (2) Methods: This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify patients diagnosed with thymoma and thymic carcinoma between 2010 and 2019. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust statistical influences between the PORT and non-PORT groups. (3) Results: A total of 2558 patients with thymoma (n = 2138) or thymic carcinoma (n = 420) were included. In the multivariate analysis, PORT was an independent prognostic factor for OS (overall survival; p < 0.001) and CSS (cancer-specific survival; p = 0.001) in thymoma and an independent prognostic factor for OS in thymic carcinoma (p = 0.018). Subgroup analyses revealed that PORT was beneficial to OS and CSS in patients with Masaoka-Koga stage IIB-IV thymoma (OS: IIB, p < 0.001; III-IV, p = 0.005; CSS: IIB, p = 0.015; III-IV, p = 0.002) and stage IIB thymic carcinoma (OS: p = 0.012; CSS: p = 0.029). (4) Conclusion: This propensity-matched analysis identified the prognostic value of PORT in thymoma and thymic carcinoma based on the SEER database. For patients with stage IIB-IV thymoma and stage IIB thymic carcinoma, PORT was associated with improved OS and CSS. A more positive attitude towards the use of PORT for nonlocalized thymoma and thymic carcinoma may be appropriate.

The Impact of Postoperative Radiotherapy on Dietary Function of Head and Neck Cancer Patients after Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction with Free Jejunal Flap.

This study investigated the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on dietary function in patients who underwent pharyngoesophageal defect reconstruction using a free jejunal flap. A retrospective chart review of 36 patients who underwent circumferential pharyngoesophageal defect reconstruction using a free jejunal flap was performed. The European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer head and neck cancer module questionnaire was used. Five items related to dietary function were selected and analyzed for changes in scores before and after PORT. Both the PORT and non-PORT groups showed improved dietary function before surgery, and no significant changes were noted at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Repeated measures ANOVA showed that PORT had no significant impact on dietary function. In univariate analysis, no variable was a significant predictor of the score at 12 months, postoperatively. Previous radiotherapy and neck dissection had a close statistically significant relation. The multivariate analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy, previous radiotherapy, and neck dissection were significant predictors of the score at 12 months, postoperatively. PORT did not show a significant effect on the 12 months postoperative score. Free jejunal flap is an effective pharyngoesophageal defect reconstruction method that does not cause any dietary function disruption after PORT.

Survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma: 513 cases from the SEER database

PuposeTo evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on survival in olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) patients with different tumor staging. Material and methodsPatients with ONB were selected in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004–2016. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan–Meier (K-M) method, Cox regression analysis, and competing risk model. ResultsA total of 513 patients were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analysis results demonstrated that PORT was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) of modified Kadish stage A and B patients (P=0.699 and P=0.248, respectively). Kadish stage C and D patients who underwent PORT had significantly better OS than those who did not undergo PORT (P=0.03 and P<0.0001). K-M curves revealed that the 5- and 10-year OS rates of patients who underwent PORT vs. non-PORT were 85.3% vs. 70.4% and 68.2% vs. 56.8% in stage C patients, respectively. For stage D patients, the 5-year OS rates were 70.7% and 42.6%, and 10-year OS rates were 53.4% and 29.5% in the PORT and non-PORT groups, respectively. The competitive risk model revealed that the 5-year cancer-specific cumulative mortality incidence decreased by 26.6% while the 10-year mortality incidence decreased by 41.4% in Kadish stage C patients who were treated using PORT; meanwhile, for Kadish stage D patients who were treated with PORT, the 5- and 10-year mortality incidences were reduced by 35.3% and 42.6%, respectively. Furthermore, we found that chemotherapy was not related to the prognosis of ONB patients (all P>0.05). ConclusionOur results indicate that PORT improved survival outcomes of modified Kadish stage C and D ONB patients. However, PORT may not affect survival for modified Kadish stage A and B individuals. Chemotherapy was not recommended for ONB; therefore, further studies are warranted to determine its therapeutic significance.

Effects of postoperative radiotherapy on cardiovascular-pulmonary disease mortality in patients with stage IIIA-N2 resected NSCLC: analysis of the SEER database

BackgroundThe role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in cardiovascular-pulmonary disease mortality in patients with stage IIIA-N2 resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain. The purpose of this population-based analysis was to explore the effect of PORT on cardiovascular-pulmonary disease mortality in these patients.MethodsPatients aged ≥ 18 years with stage IIIA-N2 resected NSCLC were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015 and were grouped according to the use of PORT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to account for differences in baseline characteristics between the Non-PORT and PORT groups. The cumulative risk for cardiovascular-pulmonary disease death was estimated using the cumulative incidence curve. Competing risk regression was used to run univariate and multivariate analyses to evaluate risk factors.ResultsA total of 3981 patients were included in the study population. Among them, 1446 patients received PORT, and 2535 did not. A total of 1380 patients remained in each group after PSM, and the baseline characteristics were not significantly different between the two groups. The cumulative incidence of cardiovascular-pulmonary mortality was 10.93% in the Non-PORT group compared with 9.85% in the PORT group. There was no significant difference in the cumulative risk between the two groups (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.77–1.48, p = 0.703). Multivariate analysis indicated that PORT had no significant impact on increased risk, with an HR of 1.18 (p = 0.377).ConclusionsNo significant differences between the PORT and Non-PORT groups were found in cardiovascular-pulmonary-specific modalities in this study. Further studies are required to validate these results. This study highlights the importance of long-term surveillance for NSCLC patients.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy in stage II and III thymoma: a Korean multicenter database study.

BackgroundComplete resection is a standard treatment for patients with Masaoka-Koga stages II and III thymoma, however the role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) is controversial. We analyzed data collected from 4 Korean hospitals to determine the effectiveness of PORT in stage II and III thymoma patients.MethodsBetween January 2000 and December 2013, 1,663 patients underwent surgery for thymic tumors at the 4 hospitals. Among them, 668 patients (527 with stage II and 141 with stage III) were investigated, among whom, 443 received PORT (335 with stage II and 108 with stage III). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, and 404 patients (346 with stage II and 58 with stage III) were selected.ResultsPerioperative characteristics were similar in the PORT and non-PORT groups after PSM. On survival analysis of stage II patients, the PORT and non-PORT groups showed no difference in either 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) (96.3% vs. 96.6%, P=0.622) or 5-year overall survival (OS) (94.6% vs. 93.8%, P=0.839). However, among stage III patients, the PORT group showed significantly better 5-year RFS (75.7% vs. 50.1%, P=0.040) and 5-year OS (86.5% vs. 54.7%, P=0.001). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, PORT was a significant positive prognostic factor in terms of both RFS (P=0.005) and OS (P=0.004) in patients with stage III thymomas, but not in those with stage II disease (P=0.987 and 0.968, respectively).ConclusionsPORT improved the RFS and OS in stage III thymoma patients, but showed no survival benefit in stage II patients.

Postoperative Radiotherapy (PORT) Improves the Survival of Patients With N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Regional Nodes Examined (RNE) ≤16 - A Real World Study Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database

PORT is widely used in patients with N2 NSCLC, but which subgroup population can benefit from PORT is still controversial. Our study is to evaluate the relationship between the RNE and the effect of PORT on survival of patients with N2 NSCLC from SEER database. Data from the SEER database were filtrated by the inclusion criteria of patients with NSCLC diagnosed at 2010-2016, with N2 disease (AJCC 7th) and treated with lobectomy or pneumonectomy. We excluded patients with unclear basic information (such as sex, histology or cause of death), multiple primary malignant tumors and M1 disease. All data were analyzed using the R version 3.6.2 software. And propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis was used to match the baseline characteristics between PORT group and non-PORT group. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of predictors of survival. The HR of PORT for patients with different RNE was calculated to determine the best cut-off value of RNE. 2904 patients were included. The baseline characteristics were as follows: age≤70 (62.9%), white (80.5%), female (51.2%), grade 1-2 (53.0%), adenocarcinoma (67.1%), T2 (51.1%), lobectomy (89.9%), chemotherapy (74.9%), median number of positive regional nodes (3), median number of RNE (12). There were 1188 patients (40.9%) with PORT. RNE≤16 was chosen as the cut-off value and divided the patients into two cohorts. PSM was then conducted between the PORT group and the non-PORT group of each cohort. In RNE≤16 cohort (1398 patients), the median OS of the PORT and non-PORT groups were 48 months vs 40 months and 5-year OS rates were 42.93% vs 39.09%, respectively (P = 0.013). The median CSS were 59 months vs 44 months and 5-year CSS rates were 48.82% vs 43.15%, respectively (P = 0.008). Univariable analysis showed that PORT significantly improved OS (HR = 0.815, P = 0.013) and CSS (HR = 0.794, P = 0.008). Multivariable analysis confirmed that PORT was the significant predictor of OS (HR = 0.816, P = 0.014) and CSS (HR = 0.799, P = 0.011). In RNE>16 cohort (550 patients), The median OS of the PORT and non-PORT groups was 44 months vs 64 months and 5-year OS rates were 42.75% vs 50.69%, respectively (P = 0.210). The median CSS of the two groups were 47 months and not reached, the 5-year CSS rates were 46.17% vs 54.10%, respectively (P = 0.207). Neither univariable nor multivariable analysis showed that PORT was an individual predictive factor. For N2 NSCLC patients with RNE≤16, PORT can significantly improve the OS and CSS. However, for those with RNE>16, PORT may not improve survival, but even have the tendency of damage. These results need to be clarified by prospective randomized clinical trials.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC)

PurposeTo assess the long-term survivals and related prognostic indicators of patients with pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (PLCNEC), and determine the prognostic value of post-operative radiotherapy in PLCNEC. Materials and methodsPatients diagnosed with PLCNEC between 2004 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included in our study. Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the factors related to overall survival (OS). Propensity score matching analysis (PSM analysis) was used to balance the variables differences between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and non-PORT groups. ResultsA total of 701 postoperative cases were identified, with the median follow-up time of 23 months. The 3- and 5-year OS were 50.7%, and 41.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that stage I (P<0.001), age <65 years old (P<0.001), chemotherapy (P<0.001) were independent favorable prognostic factors. There is no significant difference in survival between patients with or without postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) after PSM analysis (P=0.489). No survival benefit in favor of PORT were displayed, even when subgroups were deeply analyzed. ConclusionsAge, stage, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with OS of patients with resected PLCNEC. However, PORT after resection did not improve long-term outcome of PLCNEC patients.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy for completely resected pIIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer patients with different clinicopathological features: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Background: The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in completely resected pathological stage IIIA-N2 (pIIIA-N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of PORT in patients with pIIIA-N2 NSCLC on the basis of clinicopathological features.Methods: The PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), which were compared using the hazard ratio (HR).Results: One randomized trial and 12 retrospective studies were eligible for the analysis. PORT significantly improved both OS [HR = 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.92] and DFS (HR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.85) compared with non-PORT treatment in patients with multiple N2 metastases or multiple N2 station involvement. No significant difference in either OS (HR = 1.03; 95% CI: 0.86-1.24) or DFS (HR = 1.08; 95% CI: 0.70-1.65) was found between PORT and non-PORT groups for patients with single N2 station involvement. No significant heterogeneity was observed. No significant differences in OS were observed between PORT and non-PORT groups for patients of different ages, sex, tumor sizes or pT stages, and histological types.Conclusions: The findings of this meta-analysis supported a role for PORT in patients with completely resected pIIIA-N2 NSCLC having multiple N2 metastases and favored withholding PORT to patients with single N2 station involvement. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.

Male patients with resected IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy: a population-based survival analysis.

Our analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on the survival for pathologic IIIA-N2 Non-small-cell lung cancer patients. We identified 2949patients from 2004 to 2013 in the SEER database. Propensity score-matching was used to reduce the selection bias. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and the factors associated with survival prognosis were evaluated. There was no significant difference in OS and CSS between PORT and non-PORT groups. However, subgroup analysis revealed an OS (p=0.007) and CSS (p=0.006) detrimental for male patients not receiving PORT. Multivariate analysis showed that old age, male sex, high pathologic grade, squamous carcinoma, bigger tumor size and larger number of positive lymph nodes had a negative impact on survival. PORT could improve OS and CSS in male patients with resected IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer.

Association between clinicopathological factors and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with completely resected pathological N2 non-small cell lung cancer.

The function of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with completely resected pathologically N2 (pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial due to a lack of prospective studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PORT in completely resected pN2 NSCLC when using modern radiation techniques, and to determine the associations between clinicopathological factors and PORT and survival rates. Following patient selection, 246 out of 269 consecutive patients with pN2 NSCLC were enrolled in the present study, with 88 patients having received postoperative chemotherapy (POCT) and PORT, 90 having received adjuvant chemotherapy, 1 having received adjuvant radiotherapy and the remaining 67 having received no adjuvant therapy. Overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median age of the patients was 59 years, overall, 175 (71.1%) of the patients were male and the median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy. The median follow-up duration was 38.3 months. The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 98.9, 71.3 and 54.9%, and 93.0, 58.4 and 36.7% (P=0.011) in the PORT and non-PORT group, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year LRFS rates were 95.5, 84.6 and 78.0%, and 86.6, 70.6 and 52.8% (P<0.001) in the PORT and non-PORT groups, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 86.5, 55.2 and 37.9%, and 80.9, 40.3 and 26.8% (P=0.132) in the PORT and non-PORT groups, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that the OS rate was significantly increased in patients with peripheral tumors (P=0.029), pT1-2 (P=0.015), one N2 lymph node (LN) metastasis (P=0.001), single N2 station metastasis (P=0.030), no bronchial involvement (P=0.025), use of PORT (P=0.011) and POCT (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis revealed that PORT (HR, 0.755; 95% CI, 0.498-0.986; P=0.047), POCT (HR, 0.645; 95% CI, 0.420-0.988; P=0.044), bronchial involvement (HR, 1.453; 95% CI, 1.002-2.107; P=0.049) and ≥2 N2 metastases (HR, 1.969; 95% CI, 1.228-3.157; P=0.005) were significant independent predictors of OS. Subgroup analysis demonstrated an increased OS rate with PORT only in the patients with positive bronchial involvement and ≥2 N2 LN metastases. The results revealed that PORT may improve the LRFS and OS rates in completely resected pN2 NSCLC, and that the patients with positive bronchial involvement and ≥2 N2 LN metastases may receive more benefit from PORT.

Postoperative radiotherapy for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: an analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

IntroductionInvasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast poses a high risk of locoregional recurrence, and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) may be beneficial in IMPC. Hence, we determined the clinical value of PORT in IMPC patients.Patients and methodsWe assessed clinicopathological factors extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2013). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions were performed to assess the independent prognostic factors on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsOf the 881 study patients, 444 (50.4%) and 437 (49.6%) underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MAST), respectively, of whom 357 (80.4%) and 153 (35.0%) underwent PORT, respectively. Patients with young age, large tumor size, or advanced nodal stage were more likely to undergo MAST and PORT compared with MAST alone. Patients with progesterone receptor-positive disease were more likely to receive BCS and PORT compared with BCS alone. The 5-year BCSS and OS were 95.7% and 90.9%, respectively. On multivariate analyses, tumor size, histological grade, and estrogen receptor status were independent predictors of BCSS and OS. The types of surgical procedures (MAST vs. BCS) were not an independent predictor of survival outcomes. Patients who underwent MAST with or without PORT had similar BCSS and OS in the multivariate analyses. Those who underwent BCS plus PORT did not have better BCSS and OS than those who underwent BCS alone. In the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, PORT was not associated with better BCSS and OS than non-PORT groups in patients who received BCS or MAST.ConclusionIMPC has favorable BCSS and OS. Regardless of the types of surgical procedures (MAST or BCS), PORT groups were not inferior to non-PORT groups on BCSS and OS.

The role of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in combined small cell lung cancer (C-SCLC).

PurposeTo explore the value of radiotherapy in C-SCLC patients, especially in those receiving a radical resection.ResultsThe differences of survivals between the postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and non-PORT groups were not statistically significant. But analyzing the benefits in subgroups, PORT significantly improved OS (p = 0.015), DFS (p = 0.026), LRFS (p = 0.008) and DMFS (p = 0.030) in stage III patients. For the patients with N2 stage, all survivals of the PORT group were also statistically significantly higher than non-PORT group (p = 0.018, 0.032, 0.008, 0.042). Patients with more than 10% of metastatic lymph nodes could get a significant benefit survivals by receiving PORT (p = 0.033, 0.030, 0.025, 0.031). Having a systematic dissection of more than 17 lymph nodes was a subset which could get better OS and LRFS by receiving PORT (p = 0.045, 0.048).MethodsBetween Jan. 2004 to Dec. 2012, fifty-five patients diagnosed as C-SCLC after complete surgical resection in our center were retrospectively analyzed. The overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), loco-regional recurrence free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method.ConclusionsPORT can significantly improve the survival of C-SCLC patients with resected pathological pN2 stage. For the patients with a large percent of metastatic lymph nodes, PORT can also improve survivals.

Patterns of Locoregional Relapses in Patients with Contemporarily Staged Stage III-N2 NSCLC Treated with Induction Chemotherapy and Resection: Implications for Postoperative Radiotherapy Target Volumes

ObjectivesOur aim was to evaluate locoregional relapse (LR) patterns after induction chemotherapy and surgery for stage III-N2 NSCLC staged with current standard methods and their impact on radiation target volumes for postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). MethodsA total of 150 patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC from a prospective database of patients who underwent surgical resection at the University Hospitals of Leuven or the Oncologic Centre Limburg between 1998 and 2012 were included. Patients were staged with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography/computed tomography and brain imaging and treated with induction chemotherapy and surgery. PORT was performed for incomplete resection (R1/R2) and/or persistent nodal disease (ypN2). For the non-PORT group, we created a virtual planning target volume (PTV). In general, the clinical target volume encompassed the bronchial stump, the ipsilateral hilum, the subcarinal region (station 7), and the initially involved mediastinal lymph nodes. ResultsAfter a mean follow-up time of 49 months, the 5-year overall survival was 35.1% in all patients; disease-free survival was 31.8%. PORT was delivered to 70 patients. LR was seen in 26 patients in the PORT group (37%) and 32 in the non-PORT group (40%). Fifty-eight nodal relapse sites were seen in the PORT group (2.2 sites per patient) versus 113 in the non-PORT group (3.5 sites per patient) (p < 0.01). In the PORT group, the most frequent sites of LR were the ipsilateral hilum (21%), lymph node station 7 (15%), ipsilateral station 4 (9%), ipsilateral station 5 (9%) and ipsilateral station 6 (9%). For the non-PORT group these were station 7 (19%), ipsilateral 4 (16%), and ipsilateral hilum (14%). The dominant pattern of failure was inside (inside or both inside and outside) the PTV. Regarding the out-of-PTV relapses, 47% and 69% of LRs occurred in the contralateral mediastinum for the PORT and non-PORT groups, respectively. Out-of-PTV relapses occurred mostly in initially left-sided tumors. ConclusionsDespite the limitations of this retrospective study, our data support the role of PORT in decreasing local relapses. Because of the large number of out-of-PTV relapses in the contralateral mediastinum, inclusion of elective contralateral lymph node stations in the PTV could be considered in left-sided tumors. However, prospective randomized trials are needed to verify this.

Role of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Left-Sided Pancreatic Cancer—Population-Based Analysis with Propensity Score Matching

This population-based study evaluated the survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in left-sided pancreatic cancer. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with surgically resected left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2010. Propensity score matching was conducted to compare PORT and non-PORT groups. A total of 445 patients were identified, and PORT was performed in 180 (40 %) patients. In the unmatched population, there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) (P = 0.197) and cause-specific survival (CSS) (P = 0.379) between the PORT and non-PORT groups. After propensity score matching, the patients treated with PORT had longer median OS (P = 0.012) and CSS (P = 0.039) than the non-PORT group. In propensity-adjusted multivariate analysis, non-receipt of PORT was a poor prognostic factor in OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.08–1.79), and CSS (HR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.01–1.71). The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LOODS) (≥−0.73) was also associated with worse OS (P = 0.003) and CSS (P = 0.001). In left-sided pancreatic cancer, considering the addition of PORT is a reasonable option as in pancreatic head cancer. The LOODS was suggested as a strong predictive indicator of the patients’ prognoses.

The influence of adjuvant radiotherapy on patterns of failure and survivals in uterine carcinosarcoma

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on patterns of failure and survivals in uterine carcinosarcoma patients treated with radical surgery.Materials and MethodsBetween October 1998 and August 2010, 19 patients with stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma received curative hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without PORT at Seoul National University Hospital. Their hospital medical records were retrospectively reviewed. PORT and non-PORT groups included 11 and 8 patients, respectively. They were followed for a mean of 22.7 months (range, 7.8 to 126.6 months).ResultsAt 5 years, the overall survival rates were 51.9% for entire, 61.4% for PORT, and 41.7% for non-PORT groups, respectively. There was no statistical difference between PORT and non-PORT groups with regard to overall survival (p = 0.682). Seven out of 19 (36.8%) patients showed treatment failures, which all happened within 12 months. Although the predominant failures were distant metastasis in PORT group and loco-regional recurrence in non-PORT group, there was no statistically significant difference in loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) (p = 0.362) or distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (p = 0.548). Lymph node metastasis was found to be a significant prognostic factor in predicting poor LRRFS (p = 0.013) and DMFS (p = 0.021), while the International Federation Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (p = 0.043) was associated with LRRFS.ConclusionConsidering that adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection was effective to decrease loco-regional recurrence and most treatment failures were distant metastasis, multimodal therapy including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy might be an optimal treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma patients.