Non-mitotic Role Research Articles

Unraveling the interaction between a glycolytic regulator protein EhPpdk and an anaphase promoting complex protein EhApc10: yeast two hybrid screening, in vitro binding assays and molecular simulation study.

The anaphase promoting complex (APC or cyclosome) is a major ubiquitin ligase that coordinates mitotic and G1 progression, acting as a major regulator of chromosome segregation. While the human APC contains fourteen subunits, it is yet to be explored in the pathogen Entamoeba histolytica. Our study reveals the existence of a single functional Apc10 homolog in E. histolytica, which acts as a processivity factor of ubiquitin ligase activity in human. A cDNA library generated from HM1:IMSS strain of E. histolytica was screened for interaction partners of EhApc10 in yeast two hybrid study. The novel interactor, a glycolytic enzyme, pyruvate phosphate dikinase (Ppdk) was found to interact with EhApc10 and further validated by in vitro assay. A comprehensive in silico study has emphasized the structural and functional aspects, encompassing physicochemical traits, predictive 3D structure modelling, validation of EhApc10-EhPpdk interaction through molecular docking and simulation. The interplay between a cell cycle protein and a glycolytic enzyme highlights the connection between cellular metabolism and the cell cycle regulatory mechanism. The study serves as the groundwork for future research on the non-mitotic role of APC beyond cell cycle.

The non-mitotic role of HMMR in regulating the localization of TPX2 and the dynamics of microtubules in neurons.

A functional nervous system is built upon the proper morphogenesis of neurons to establish the intricate connection between them. The microtubule cytoskeleton is known to play various essential roles in this morphogenetic process. While many microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) have been demonstrated to participate in neuronal morphogenesis, the function of many more remains to be determined. This study focuses on a MAP called HMMR in mice, which was originally identified as a hyaluronan binding protein and later found to possess microtubule and centrosome binding capacity. HMMR exhibits high abundance on neuronal microtubules and altering the level of HMMR significantly affects the morphology of neurons. Instead of confining to the centrosome(s) like cells in mitosis, HMMR localizes to microtubules along axons and dendrites. Furthermore, transiently expressing HMMR enhances the stability of neuronal microtubules and increases the formation frequency of growing microtubules along the neurites. HMMR regulates the microtubule localization of a non-centrosomal microtubule nucleator TPX2 along the neurite, offering an explanation for how HMMR contributes to the promotion of growing microtubules. This study sheds light on how cells utilize proteins involved in mitosis for non-mitotic functions.

The non-mitotic role of HMMR in regulating the localization of TPX2 and the dynamics of microtubules in neurons

The non-mitotic role of HMMR in regulating the localization of TPX2 and the dynamics of microtubules in neurons

Inhibition of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) triggers cell apoptosis via ROS-caused mitochondrial dysfunction in colorectal carcinoma.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), a member of the serine/threonine kinase PLK family, is the most investigated and essential in the regulation of cell cycle progression, including chromosome segregation, centrosome maturation and cytokinesis. However, the nonmitotic role of PLK1 in CRC is poorly understood. In this study, we explored the tumorigenic effects of PLK1 and its potential as a therapeutic target in CRC. GEPIA database and immunohistochemistry analysis were performed to evaluate the abnormal expression of PLK1 in CRC patients. MTT assay, colony formation and transwell assay were performed to assess cell viability, colony formation ability and migration ability after inhibiting PLK1 by RNAi or the small molecule inhibitor BI6727. Cell apoptosis, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) and ROS levels were evaluated by flow cytometry. Bioluminescence imaging was performed to evaluate the impact of PLK1 on CRC cell survival in a preclinical model. Finally, xenograft tumor model was established to study the effect of PLK1 inhibition on tumor growth. First, immunohistochemistry analysis revealed the significant accumulation of PLK1 in patient-derived CRC tissues compared with adjacent healthy tissues. Furthermore, PLK1 inhibition genetically or pharmacologically significantly reduced cell viability, migration and colony formation, and triggered apoptosis of CRC cells. Additionally, we found that PLK1 inhibition elevated cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and decreased the Bcl2/Bax ratio, which led to mitochondrial dysfunction and the release of Cytochrome c, a key process in initiating cell apoptosis. These data provide new insights into the pathogenesis of CRC and support the potential value of PLK1 as an appealing target for CRC treatment. Overall, the underlying mechanism of inhibiting PLK1-induced apoptosis indicates that the PLK1 inhibitor BI6727 may be a novel potential therapeutic strategy in the treatment of CRC.

AurkA nuclear localization is promoted by TPX2 and counteracted by protein degradation.

The AurkA kinase is a well-known mitotic regulator, frequently overexpressed in tumors. The microtubule-binding protein TPX2 controls AurkA activity, localization, and stability in mitosis. Non-mitotic roles of AurkA are emerging, and increased nuclear localization in interphase has been correlated with AurkA oncogenic potential. Still, the mechanisms leading to AurkA nuclear accumulation are poorly explored. Here, we investigated these mechanisms under physiological or overexpression conditions. We observed that AurkA nuclear localization is influenced by the cell cycle phase and nuclear export, but not by its kinase activity. Importantly, AURKA overexpression is not sufficient to determine its accumulation in interphase nuclei, which is instead obtained when AURKA and TPX2 are co-overexpressed or, to a higher extent, when proteasome activity is impaired. Expression analyses show that AURKA, TPX2, and the import regulator CSE1L are co-overexpressed in tumors. Finally, using MCF10A mammospheres we show that TPX2 co-overexpression drives protumorigenic processes downstream of nuclear AurkA. We propose that AURKA/TPX2 co-overexpression in cancer represents a key determinant of AurkA nuclear oncogenic functions.

Repurposing a Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1 (CDK1) Mitotic Regulatory Network to Complete Terminal Differentiation in Lens Fiber Cells.

During lens fiber cell differentiation, organelles are removed in an ordered manner to ensure lens clarity. A critical step in this process is removal of the cell nucleus, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are unclear. In this study, we investigate the role of a cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) regulatory loop in controlling lens fiber cell denucleation (LFCD). We examined lens differentiation histologically in two different vertebrate models. An embryonic chick lens culture system was used to test the role of CDK1, cell division cycle 25 (CDC25), WEE1, and PP2A in LFCD. Additionally, we used three mouse models that express high levels of the CDK inhibitor p27 to test whether increased p27 levels affect LFCD. Using chick lens organ cultures, small-molecule inhibitors of CDK1 and CDC25 inhibit LFCD, while inhibiting the CDK1 inhibitory kinase WEE1 potentiates LFCD. Additionally, treatment with an inhibitor of PP2A, which indirectly inhibits CDK1 activity, also increased LFCD. Three different mouse models that express increased levels of p27 through different mechanisms show impaired LFCD. Here we define a conserved nonmitotic role for CDK1 and its upstream regulators in controlling LFCD. We find that CDK1 functionally interacts with WEE1, a nuclear kinase that inhibits CDK1 activity, and CDC25 activating phosphatases in cells where CDK1 activity must be exquisitely regulated to allow for LFCD. We also provide genetic evidence in multiple in vivo models that p27, a CDK1 inhibitor, inhibits lens growth and LFCD.

A review of Plks: Thinking outside the (polo) box.

The polo-like kinase (Plk) family is comprised of five different members (Plk1-5), each with their own distinct functions. Plk family members participate in pivotal cell division processes as well as in non-mitotic roles. Importantly, Plk expression has been correlated with various disease states, including cancer. Multiples therapies, which primarily target Plk1, are currently being investigated alone or in combination with other agents for clinical use in different cancers. As the role of Plks in disease progression becomes more prominent, it is important to outline their functions as cell cycle regulators and more. This review summarizes the structure and both mitotic and non-mitotic functions of each of the five Plk family members, sequentially. Additionally, the proposed mechanisms for how Plks contribute to tumorigenesis and the therapeutics currently under investigation are outlined.

A non-mitotic role for Eg5 in regulating cilium formation and sonic hedgehog signaling

A non-mitotic role for Eg5 in regulating cilium formation and sonic hedgehog signaling

An interphase pool of KIF11 localizes at the basal bodies of primary cilia and a reduction in KIF11 expression alters cilia dynamics

KIF11 is a homotetrameric kinesin that peaks in protein expression during mitosis. It is a known mitotic regulator, and it is well-described that KIF11 is necessary for the formation and maintenance of the bipolar spindle. However, there has been a growing appreciation for non-mitotic roles for KIF11. KIF11 has been shown to function in such processes as axon growth and microtubule polymerization. We previously demonstrated that there is an interphase pool of KIF11 present in glioblastoma cancer stem cells that drives tumor cell invasion. Here, we identified a previously unknown association between KIF11 and primary cilia. We confirmed that KIF11 localized to the basal bodies of primary cilia in multiple cell types, including neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells. Further, we determined that KIF11 has a role in regulating cilia dynamics. Upon the reduction of KIF11 expression, the number of ciliated cells in asynchronously growing populations was significantly increased. We rescued this effect by the addition of exogenous KIF11. Lastly, we found that depleting KIF11 resulted in an increase in cilium length and an attenuation in the kinetics of cilia disassembly. These findings establish a previously unknown link between KIF11 and the dynamics of primary cilia and further support non-mitotic functions for this kinesin.

Direct Phosphorylation and Stabilization of MYC By Aurora B Kinase Promotes T Cell Leukemogenesis

The aberrant activation of oncogene MYC (also termed c-MYC) is one of the most common features in human cancer. The unleashed MYC oncogene frequently produces abundant MYC protein, which mediates a transcriptional response involved in a variety of biological processes, contributing to almost every aspect of tumorigenesis. The significance of MYC deregulation has been recognized in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL), a life-threatening hematological malignancy with dismal outcome due to disease relapse and drug resistance. Therapeutic efforts aimed at inhibiting MYC expression or activity should have an important clinical relevance. However, attempts to directly disrupt MYC function have met with limited success, in part due to its "undruggable" protein structure. Aurora kinases, a multi-genic family of serine/threonine kinases, consist Aurora A (AURKA), Aurora B (AURKB) and Aurora C (AURKC). They are known to play an integral role in the regulation of cell division and chromosomal segregation. Amplification or overexpression of Aurora kinases is frequently found in human cancers with clear evidence of oncogenic potential, implicating Aurora kinases as rational anti-tumor targets. AURKB is the catalytic subunit of the chromosomal passenger protein complex (CPPC) which regulates multiple facets of cell division. Overexpression of AURKB has been reported in a variety of cancers and predicts poor overall survival. AZD1152 is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of Aurora B; preclinical evidence of anti-tumor efficacy with AZD1152 has extended to the clinical setting with tolerable toxicity. Despite considerable study, it remains largely unclear how expression of AURKB is elevated and, in particular, how elevated levels of AURKB reprogram cells to promote the cancer progression. We identified AURKB as a novel MYC binding partner using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. To assess the potential role of AURKB in regulating MYC, we inhibited AURKB in multiple T-ALL cell lines and found that MYC protein expression was diminished significantly. Notably, depletion of AURKB failed to downregulate MYC mRNA, suggesting a post-transcriptional regulation of the MYC protein. We then assessed MYC protein decay in the presence or absence of AURKB expression. Time course experiments revealed that knockdown of AURKB significantly shortened the half-life of endogenous MYC in T-ALL cells. Consistently, AURKB depletion resulted in significant downregulation of MYC-induced gene expression programs, corroborating an essential role of AURKB in sustaining MYC transcriptional activities. Regulation of MYC degradation by ubiquitin-proteasome system is dependent on MYC phosphorylation. Initiation of MYC turnover requires GSK3b-mediated phosphorylation of threonine 58 (p-T58). Time-course analysis showed that treatment with AZD1152 in T-ALL cells resulted in a notable increase in MYC p-T58. We performed in vitro kinase assays and found that MYC is phosphorylated directly by AURKB. This phosphorylation counteracted GSK3b-directed Thr58 phosphorylation and subsequent FBW7-mediated proteasomal degradation and enhanced the MYC protein stability. The AURKB mRNA and protein are generally more abundant in human T-ALL than normal thymocytes. We demonstrated that MYC, in concert with TAL1, directly binds to the AURKB promoter and activates its transcription, thus constituting a reciprocal regulation between MYC and AURKB. In order to clarify the biological significance of the AURKB-MYC circuit, we co-injected the one-cell-stage zebrafish embryos with the rag2:EGFP-Myc construct alone or together with rag2:AURKB followed by fluorescent microscopy analysis. Our results demonstrate that AURKB phosphorylation of MYC is functionally important for T cell leukemogenesis in vivo. Moreover, inhibition of AURKB elicits dramatic MYC degradation in association with robust apoptosis in wild type-FBW7 T-ALL cells, suggesting that FBW7 mutational status may serve as a genetic predictor of sensitivity to AURKB inhibitors. In this study, we unravel a non-mitotic role of AURKB in promoting MYC stabilization via direct MYC phosphorylation at an unconventional site. Our findings decipher a previously unsuspected mechanism involved in MYC deregulation and highlight disruption of the AURKB-MYC signaling circuit as a promising T-ALL therapeutic strategy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Insights into the non-mitotic functions of Aurora kinase A: more than just cell division.

AURKA is a serine/threonine kinase overexpressed in several cancers. Originally identified as a protein with multifaceted roles during mitosis, improvements in quantitative microscopy uncovered several non-mitotic roles as well. In physiological conditions, AURKA regulates cilia disassembly, neurite extension, cell motility, DNA replication and senescence programs. In cancer-like contexts, AURKA actively promotes DNA repair, it acts as a transcription factor, promotes cell migration and invasion, and it localises at mitochondria to regulate mitochondrial dynamics and ATP production. Here we review the non-mitotic roles of AURKA, and its partners outside of cell division. In addition, we give an insight into how structural data and quantitative fluorescence microscopy allowed to understand AURKA activation and its interaction with new substrates, highlighting future developments in fluorescence microscopy needed to better understand AURKA functions in vivo. Last, we will recapitulate the most significant AURKA inhibitors currently in clinical trials, and we will explore how the non-mitotic roles of the kinase may provide new insights to ameliorate current pharmacological strategies against AURKA overexpression.

Molecular targeting of the Aurora-A/SMAD5 oncogenic axis restores chemosensitivity in human breast cancer cells.

Although the majority of breast cancers initially respond to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents, most breast cancer patients experience tumor relapse and ultimately die because of drug resistance. Breast cancer cells undergoing epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) acquire a CD44+/CD24-/ALDH1+ cancer stem cell-like phenotype characterized by an increased capacity for tumor self-renewal, intrinsic drug resistance and high proclivity to develop distant metastases. We uncovered in human breast tumor xenografts a novel non-mitotic role of Aurora-A kinase in promoting breast cancer metastases through activation of EMT and expansion of breast tumor initiating cells (BTICs). In this study we characterized the role of the Aurora-A/SMAD5 oncogenic axis in the induction of chemoresistance. Breast cancer cells overexpressing Aurora-A showed resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic agents, while treatment with alisertib, a selective Aurora-A kinase inhibitor, restored chemosensitivity. Significantly, SMAD5 expression was required to induce chemoresistance and maintain a breast cancer stem cell-like phenotype, indicating that the Aurora-A/SMAD5 oncogenic axis promotes chemoresistance through activation of stemness signaling. Taken together, these findings identified a novel mechanism of drug resistance through aberrant activation of the non-canonical Aurora-A/SMAD5 oncogenic axis in breast cancer.

Abstract 1217: Blockade of Aurora kinase A synergizes with platinum and radiation in non-small cell lung cancer cells

Abstract Background: Most patients with advanced lung cancer will receive platinum-based therapy during their treatment course despite limited clinical benefits. Thus, strategies to improve platinum-based therapy continue to be needed. Through a functional genetic screen, we have identified Aurora kinase A as a potentially actionable candidate that can modulate the activity of platinum compounds. Aurora A is a serine/threonine kinase and a key regulator of the mitotic process. Through its mitotic and non-mitotic roles, the aberrant activation of Aurora A can lead to oncogenic transformation and has emerged as a promising therapeutic target in cancer. METHODS: High-throughput RNAi screen was used to identify potential candidates for cisplatin resistance. Cell proliferation/viability was determined by MTS assays and colony formation assays. Immunohistochemistry was performed to determine the overexpression of Aurora A in specimens from lung cancer patients. Western blot was used to explore the cell signaling mechanisms in cisplatin, radiation, and/or MLN8237 (alisertib) treated NSCLC cell lines. β-Galactosidase staining was performed to determine the senescence following cisplatin and/or MLN8237 treatment in NSCLC cell lines. RESULTS: Aurora Kinase A is widely expressed in lung cancer specimens. The expression of Aurora A is upregulated following treatment with Cisplatin in NSCLC cells, such as PC9, A549, H1703, and H460. Inhibition of Aurora A activity with either siRNA-mediated knockdown or pharmacological blockade (MLN8237) significantly improved sensitivities to cisplatin and ionizing radiation, both of which cause DNA damage and cell death. On the other hand, inhibition of Aurora A activity by itself was associated with reduced cell proliferation and survival of NSCLC cell lines. Moreover, co-administration with Cisplatin and AURKA siRNA resulted in sustained DNA double strand breaks and more pronounced apoptosis. The combination of AURKA inhibitor (MLN8237) with Cisplatin similarly led to enhanced DNA damage. Similar effects were observed with radiation concomitant with inhibition of Aurora A. Furthermore, MLN8237 induced marked apoptosis in the p53 mutant cell line, PC9, whereas more senescence was noted in p53 wild type A549 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates a significant role for Aurora Kinase A as a common modulator of p53-dependent resistance in the context of DNA-damaging platinum and radiation therapy. Aurora A inhibition can potentially improve the efficacy of these common treatment modalities in lung cancer management. Citation Format: Huijie Liu, Dongwei Zhang, Alain Borczuk, Vincent Chau, Roman Perez-Soler, Balazs Halmos, Haiying Cheng. Blockade of Aurora kinase A synergizes with platinum and radiation in non-small cell lung cancer cells [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1217. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1217

Location and functional analysis of the Aspergillus nidulans Aurora kinase confirm mitotic functions and suggest non-mitotic roles

Filamentous fungi have devastating negative impacts as pathogens and agents of food spoilage but also have critical ecological importance and are utilized for industrial applications. The characteristic multinucleate nature of filamentous fungi is facilitated by limiting if, when and where septation, the fungal equivalent of cytokinesis, occurs. In the model filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans septation does not occur immediately after mitosis and is an incomplete process resulting in the formation of a septal pore whose permeability is cell cycle regulated. How mitotic regulators, such as the Aurora kinase, contribute to the often unique biology of filamentous fungi is not well understood. The Aurora B kinase has not previously been investigated in any detail during hyphal growth. Here we demonstrate for the first time that Aurora displays cell cycle dependent locations to the region of forming septa, the septal pore and mature septa as well as the mitotic apparatus. To functionally analyze Aurora, we generated a temperature sensitive allele revealing essential mitotic and spindle assembly checkpoint functions consistent with its location to the kinetochore region and spindle midzone. Our analysis also reveals that cellular and kinetochore Aurora levels increase during a mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint arrest and we propose that this could be important for checkpoint inactivation when spindle formation is prevented. We demonstrate that Aurora accumulation at mature septa following mitotic entry does not require mitotic progression but is dependent upon a timing mechanism. Surprisingly we also find that Aurora inactivation leads to cellular swelling and lysis indicating an unexpected function for Aurora in fungal cell growth. Thus in addition to its conserved mitotic functions our data suggest that Aurora has the capacity to be an important regulator of septal biology and cell growth in filamentous fungi.

The CDC20-APC/SOX2 signaling axis: An achilles' heel for glioblastoma

ABSTRACTGlioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs) play a critical role in glioblastoma progression and recurrence. We discuss recent results on the role of the mitotic ubiquitin ligase cell division cycle 20–anaphase-promoting complex (CDC20-APC) in the governance of cardinal GSC functions through a mechanism involving the transcription factor sex-determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2). These findings expand the non-mitotic roles of CDC20-APC with implications for stem cell biology.

Aurora-A Kinase as a Promising Therapeutic Target in Cancer.

Mammalian Aurora family of serine/threonine kinases are master regulators of mitotic progression and are frequently overexpressed in human cancers. Among the three members of the Aurora kinase family (Aurora-A, -B, and -C), Aurora-A and Aurora-B are expressed at detectable levels in somatic cells undergoing mitotic cell division. Aberrant Aurora-A kinase activity has been implicated in oncogenic transformation through the development of chromosomal instability and tumor cell heterogeneity. Recent studies also reveal a novel non-mitotic role of Aurora-A activity in promoting tumor progression through activation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition reprograming resulting in the genesis of tumor-initiating cells. Therefore, Aurora-A kinase represents an attractive target for cancer therapeutics, and the development of small molecule inhibitors of Aurora-A oncogenic activity may improve the clinical outcomes of cancer patients. In the present review, we will discuss mitotic and non-mitotic functions of Aurora-A activity in oncogenic transformation and tumor progression. We will also review the current clinical studies, evaluating small molecule inhibitors of Aurora-A activity and their efficacy in the management of cancer patients.

LGN Directs Interphase Endothelial Cell Behavior via the Microtubule Network.

Angiogenic sprouts require coordination of endothelial cell (EC) behaviors as they extend and branch. Microtubules influence behaviors such as cell migration and cell-cell interactions via regulated growth and shrinkage. Here we investigated the role of the mitotic polarity protein LGN in EC behaviors and sprouting angiogenesis. Surprisingly, reduced levels of LGN did not affect oriented division of EC within a sprout, but knockdown perturbed overall sprouting. At the cell level, LGN knockdown compromised cell-cell adhesion and migration. EC with reduced LGN levels also showed enhanced growth and stabilization of microtubules that correlated with perturbed migration. These results fit a model whereby LGN influences interphase microtubule dynamics in endothelial cells to regulate migration, cell adhesion, and sprout extension, and reveal a novel non-mitotic role for LGN in sprouting angiogenesis.

Scientific Rationale Supporting the Clinical Development Strategy for the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Cancer.

Alisertib (MLN8237) is a selective small molecule inhibitor of Aurora A kinase that is being developed in multiple cancer indications as a single agent and in combination with other therapies. A significant amount of research has elucidated a role for Aurora A in orchestrating numerous activities of cells transiting through mitosis and has begun to shed light on potential non-mitotic roles for Aurora A as well. These biological insights laid the foundation for multiple clinical trials evaluating the antitumor activity of alisertib in both solid cancers and heme-lymphatic malignancies. Several key facets of Aurora A biology as well as empirical data collected in experimental systems and early clinical trials have directed the development of alisertib toward certain cancer types, including neuroblastoma, small cell lung cancer, neuroendocrine prostate cancer, atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors, and breast cancer among others. In addition, these scientific insights provided the rationale for combining alisertib with other therapies, including microtubule perturbing agents, such as taxanes, EGFR inhibitors, hormonal therapies, platinums, and HDAC inhibitors among others. Here, we link the key aspects of the current clinical development of alisertib to the originating scientific rationale and provide an overview of the alisertib clinical experience to date.

A non-mitotic role for Aurora kinase A as a direct activator of cell migration upon interaction with PLD, FAK and Src.

ABSTRACTTimely activation of Aurora kinase A (AURA, also known as AURKA) is vital for centrosome formation and the progression of mitosis. Nonetheless, it is still unclear if and when other cellular functions are activated by AURA. We report here that Src phosphorylates and activates AURA at T288, and AURA also activates focal adhesion kinase (FAK, also known as PTK2), leading to initiation of cell movement. An additional and new way by which AURA is regulated, is by phospholipase D2 (PLD2), which causes AURA activation. In addition, AURA phosphorylates PLD, so both proteins engage in a positive reinforcement loop. AURA and PLD2 form a protein–protein complex and colocalize to cytoplasmic regions in cells. The reason why PLD activates AURA is because of the production of phosphatidic acid by the lipase, which binds directly to AURA, with the region E171–E211 projected to be a phosphatidic-acid-binding pocket. Furthermore, this direct interaction with phosphatidic acid enhances tubulin polymerization and cooperates synergistically with AURA, FAK and Src in yielding a fully effectual cellular migration. Thus, Src and FAK, and PLD and phosphatidic acid are new upstream regulators of AURA that mediate its role in the non-mitotic cellular function of cell migration.

Cell cycle progression by the repression of primary cilia formation in proliferating cells

In most cell types, primary cilia protrude from the cell surface and act as major hubs for cell signaling, cell differentiation, and cell polarity. With the exception of some cells ciliated during cell proliferation, most cells begin to disassemble their primary cilia at cell cycle re-entry. Although the role of primary cilia disassembly on cell cycle progression is still under debate, recent data have emerged to support the idea that primary cilia exert influence on cell cycle progression. In this review, we emphasize a non-mitotic role of Aurora-A not only in the ciliary resorption at cell cycle re-entry but also in continuous suppression of cilia regeneration during cell proliferation. We also summarize recent new findings indicating that forced induction/suppression of primary cilia can affect cell cycle progression, in particular the transition from G0/G1 to S phase. In addition, we speculate how (de)ciliation affects cell cycle progression.