Non-metastatic Osteosarcoma Patients Research Articles

Determinants of tumor necrosis and its impact on outcome in patients with Localized osteosarcoma uniformly treated with a response adapted regimen without high dose Methotrexate– A retrospective institutional analysis

PurposeResponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in form of tumor necrosis predicts outcome in osteosarcoma; although response-adapted treatment escalation failed to improve outcome among patients treated with high-dose methotrexate-based (HDMTx) chemotherapy. This study aimed to identify factors predicting tumor necrosis and its impact on survival among patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma treated with a response-adapted non-HDMTx regimen. MethodsA retrospective single-institutional study was conducted among non-metastatic osteosarcoma patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy between 2004–2019. Patients were treated uniformly with three cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin/doxorubicin. Post-operatively, patients with favourable necrosis (≥90 %) received 3 cycles of cisplatin/doxorubicin, while patients with poor necrosis (<90 %) received escalated treatment with alternating six cycles of cisplatin/doxorubicin and ifosfamide/etoposide. Propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were conducted to ascertain independent impact of necrosis on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). ResultsOf 594 registered osteosarcoma patients, 280 patients (median age 17 years; male 67.1 %) were included for analysis. 73 patients (26.1 %) achieved favourable necrosis. Patients with smaller tumor size (≤10 cm) (aOR = 2.28; p = 0.030), lower serum alkaline phosphatase (≤450 IU/L) (aOR = 2.10; p = 0.035), and who had surgery earlier (<115 days) (aOR = 2.28; p = 0.016) were more likely to have favourable necrosis. On 1:2 PSM analysis, patients not achieving favourable necrosis demonstrated inferior EFS (HR = 2.68; p = 0.003) and OS (HR = 3.42; p = 0.003). ConclusionsPatients of osteosarcoma with smaller tumor, lower serum alkaline phosphatase and earlier surgery are more likely to achieve favourable necrosis. Tumor necrosis independently predicts outcome in osteosarcoma, and response-adapted treatment escalation fails to overcome the adverse impact of poor necrosis in non-HDMTx based regimen.

IGFBP5 in osteosarcoma tumorigenesis: Gene expression profile among metastatic and non-metastatic patients

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most frequent primary malignant bone tumor among children and adolescents, with a peak of incidence in the second decade of life. The presence of metastasis at diagnosis in OS patients significantly decreases the chances of survival and new therapy approaches are needed. The IGFBP5 gene is related to osteoblasts metabolism and some studies have pointed out a role of its low expressions in OS development and metastasis. In this study, we aimed to establish an IGFBP5 gene expression profile among metastatic and non-metastatic OS patients throughout the treatment and development of the disease. Fresh-frozen tumor samples were obtained from 40 patients admitted to treatment at the Pediatric Oncology Institute (IOP/GRAACC/UNIFESP) and divided by clinical status: metastatic or non-metastatic disease. For each patient, samples before and after chemotherapy treatment were obtained, as well as metastasis and lung tissue surrounding metastasis samples from the metastatic patients. A quantitative real-time PCR was used to investigate IGFBP5 expression. Our analyses demonstrate that non-metastatic patients presented lower IGFBP5 expression in their pre-chemotherapy samples compared with metastatic patients, suggesting that low expressions of this gene could help triggering the OS tumorigenesis but that its action alone is not sufficient to activate the metastatic process. Heterogeneity in IGFBP5 expressions within groups was also seen. We observed that IGFBP5 and two MAPK genes, a downstream pathway in the IGFBP5 axis, are differentially expressed in OS samples of non-metastatic patients. Further investigation about these genes’ modulations might lead to a better understanding of metastasis development in OS.

Exploring Mitochondrial Autophagy Dysregulation in Osteosarcoma: Its Implications for Prognosis and Targeted Therapy

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the differential expression of mitophagyrelated genes in osteosarcoma patients with distinct prognostic outcomes and explore potential molecular regulatory mechanisms. Methods: We analyzed microarray data from metastatic and nonmetastatic osteosarcoma patients using the UCSC dataset. Differential gene screening and intersection of mitophagy-related genes were performed using NetworkAnalyst. Random forest and LASSO regression were employed to screen selected genes and establish a risk prediction model. Functional enrichment analysis, protein- protein interaction (PPI) networks, immunoassays, and in vitro experiments were conducted to validate the findings. Results: Seven differentially expressed genes were identified, and a robust risk prediction model was developed (AUC=0.886). PPI and functional enrichment analyses provided insights into relevant molecules and regulatory pathways. The immunoassay results revealed differences in the immune environment between the metastatic and nonmetastatic groups. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated significant downregulation of EPHA3 expression in the metastatic group, and in vitro experiments indicated that inhibiting EPHA3 increased the proliferative activity and migration ability of osteosarcoma cells. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the downregulation of EPHA3 may contribute to mitochondrial autophagy dysfunction, thereby increasing the risk of osteosarcoma metastasis.

Heterogeneous Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles for Osteosarcoma Diagnosis.

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most prevalent primary tumor of bones, often diagnosed late with a poor prognosis. Currently, few effective biomarkers or diagnostic methods have been developed for early OS detection with high confidence, especially for metastatic OS. Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) are emerging as promising biomarkers for early cancer diagnosis through liquid biopsy. Here, we report a plasmonic imaging-based biosensing technique, termed subpopulation protein analysis by single EV counting (SPASEC), for size-dependent EV subpopulation analysis. In our SPASEC platform, EVs are accurately sized and counted on plasmonic sensor chips coated with OS-specific antibodies. Subsequently, EVs are categorized into distinct subpopulations based on their sizes, and the membrane proteins of each size-dependent subpopulation are profiled. We measured the heterogeneous expression levels of the EV markers (CD63, BMP2, GD2, and N-cadherin) in each of the EV subsets from both OS cell lines and clinical plasma samples. Using the linear discriminant analysis (LDA) model, the combination of four markers is applied to classify the healthy donors (n = 37), nonmetastatic OS patients (n = 13), and metastatic patients (n = 12) with an area under the curve of 0.95, 0.92, and 0.99, respectively. SPASEC provides accurate EV sensing technology for early OS diagnosis.

Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Osteosarcoma Are Associated With Increased Risk of Pulmonary Metastasis.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor in children. In addition to pulmonary metastasis, computed tomography frequently detects indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPN). We conducted this study to determine the clinical significance of IPN in terms of progression to pulmonary metastasis and its impact on survival. It was a retrospective cohort study of pediatric nonmetastatic osteosarcoma patients treated from January 2005 to December 2018. Baseline computed tomography scans were reviewed for the presence of IPN (defined as a single nodule of <10 mm or ≥3 nodules of <5 mm). Subsequent scans were reviewed for the development of pulmonary metastasis. Of 155 patients, 31.6% (n=49) had IPN at baseline. A total of 43% (n=21) of those with IPN subsequently progressed to pulmonary metastasis compared with only 26% (n=28) of those without IPN (P<0.001) with a relative risk of 1.6 (1.03 to 2.5) in the IPN group. Patients with ≥3 IPN at baseline were at significantly greater risk of pulmonary metastasis as compared with <3 IPN (P=0.013). Overall and event-free survival in patients with and without IPN was 58% and 35%, and 72% and 46%, respectively. Our results suggest that patients with IPN may be at greater risk for progressing to pulmonary metastasis.

Muramyl Tripeptide Plus Chemotherapy Reduces Metastasis in Non-Metastatic Osteosarcoma: A Single-Center Experience.

Background:The immunomodulator mifamurtide plus a chemotherapy regimen has been shown to significantly improve the outcome in non-metastatic osteosarcoma patients. We report the results of the addition of mifamurtide to chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with osteosarcoma. Methods:A total of 36 children with osteosarcoma without detectable metastasis were treated between November 2010 and April 2018 at the Ankara University Department of Pediatric Oncology. Mifamurtide was added to the chemotherapy regimen in 17 patients while the remaining 19 did not receive mifamurtide. The probabilities of metastasis and overall survival were compared between the groups. Results:The 43-month survival rate was 87.5% and 89.9% in the patients who received and did not receive mifamurtide, respectively (p=0.65). Common side effects of mifamurtide were chills and fever. The addition of mifamurtide in the high-risk group with ≤95% necrosis tended to decrease the probability of distant metastasis (36.4% vs. 58.3%) (p=0.39). The time to metastasis in the group with positive surgical margins (4 months in one patient in the non-mifamurtide group, 7 and 20 months in the mifamurtide group) was also longer in the mifamurtide group. During the 43-month follow up period, median time to metastasis was longer in the mifamurtide group (20 vs. 5 months). In addition, mifamurtide plus chemotherapy decreased the risk of metastasis in the cases with primary site relapse. Conclusions:The addition of mifamurtide to chemotherapy might improve event-free survival by decreasing the probability of distant metastasis in bad histologic responders, and also by increasing the time to distant metastasis in the surgical margin positive group. Additional clinical studies are necessary to determine the long-term effects of mifamurtide on metastatic disease.

Osteosarcoma journey over two decades in India: Small steps, big changes.

The management of osteosarcoma is challenging especially in lower-income and middle-income countries, and there is an unmet need to evolve efficient and sustainable chemotherapy regimens. We compared the outcomes in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma patients treated with three sequential non-high-dose methotrexate-based combination chemotherapy protocols at a single tertiary care center over two decades. The first protocol, OGS-99, involved dose-intense, alternating dyads of three drugs: doxorubicin (Dox), cisplatin (CDDP), and ifosfamide (Ifo). The second protocol, OGS-99 enhanced, included OGS-99 drugs with etoposide and enhanced supportive care. The OGS-12 protocol involved dose-dense administration of eight sequential dyads of Dox, CDDP and Ifo, universal growth factor prophylaxis and targeted nutritional support. Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were reported using a retrospective chart review in the OGS-99 and OGS-99 enhanced protocols and prospectively in the OGS-12 protocol. A total of 41, 94, and 385 treatment-naïve, consecutive, nonmetastatic patients with extremity osteosarcoma were treated with the OGS-99 (2000-2005), OGS-99 enhanced (2010), and OGS-12 (2011-2016), respectively. At a median follow-up of 19, 86, and 39 months, the five-year EFS rates were 38%, 50%, and 62% in the OGS-99, OGS-99 enhanced, and OGS-12, respectively. The corresponding rates of five-year OS were nonevaluable, 60% and 77%, respectively, with acceptable rates of grade 3-4 toxicities: febrile neutropenia (40%), thrombocytopenia (36%), anemia (51%), and 1% deaths related to toxicity. Sequential selection of an intelligent, dose-dense chemotherapy regimen together with enhanced supportive care resulted in marked improvement in outcomes of nonmetastatic osteosarcoma and this "small steps-big changes" model deserves wider recognition and usage.

Effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition to standard chemotherapy for high-grade osteosarcoma: a systematic review.

Osteosarcoma mostly occurs during the period of rapid bone growth in children and adolescents as high-grade osteosarcomas. Current treatment recommended for high-grade non-metastatic and metastatic and/or relapsed osteosarcoma involves neoadjuvant multiagent conventional chemotherapy, followed by surgical resection of macroscopically detected tumor and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. However, residual micrometastatic deposits that develop following surgery have shown resistance to postoperative/adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, there is a critical need for more effective and innovative therapeutic approaches such as immune stimulatory agents. The most extensively studied immune stimulatory agent in the treatment of osteosarcoma is mifamurtide. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition to standard chemotherapy on survival outcomes. To present the best available evidence on the treatment of high-grade non-metastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma with mifamurtide in addition to standard chemotherapy. All populations of patients regardless of age, gender or ethnicity with high-grade, resectable, non-metastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma based on histological diagnosis. This review focused on intravenous infusion of either of the pharmaceutical formulations of mifamurtide (MTP-PE or L-MTP-PE) in addition to standard chemotherapy, and the comparator was chemotherapy alone. This review considered any experimental study design including randomized controlled trials, non-randomized trials and quasi-experimental studies. The primary outcomes of interest were event-free survival, overall survival and recurrence of osteosarcoma. Secondary outcomes that were considered included health-related quality of life and any mifamurtide-related adverse events. A search for published and unpublished literature in English was undertaken (seven published literature databases, four unpublished literature databases, and three government agency and organizational websites were searched). Studies published between 1990 to June 2016 were considered. A three-step strategy was developed using MeSH terminology and keywords to ensure that all relevant studies were included related to this review. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed by two reviewers, who appraised each study independently, using a standardized Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Data was extracted from the studies that were identified as meeting the criteria for methodological quality using the standard JBI data extraction tool. Due to the heterogeneity of populations and interventions in available studies, meta-analysis was not possible and results are presented in narrative form. Three papers outlining two studies involving 802 patients evaluated the effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition of chemotherapy. Results indicated no significant difference in event-free survival between the addition of mifamurtide to standard chemotherapy regimen and chemotherapy alone, both in non-metastatic and metastatic osteosarcoma patients. There was a significant difference in progression-free survival favoring the addition of mifamurtide in pulmonary metastatic and/or relapsed osteosarcoma. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the addition of mifamurtide and chemotherapy alone in metastatic osteosarcoma; however there was a significant difference favoring the addition of mifamurtide in non-metastatic osteosarcoma patients. The addition of mifamurtide resulted in a significant difference in survival after relapse in pulmonary metastatic and/or relapsed osteosarcoma patients. Both studies reported on mifamurtide-related adverse events - the first was reported as toxicity which included haematological, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal disorders, cardiac, rhythm and nervous system disorders, ear disorders and others (infection, fever; and performance status) in metastatic osteosarcoma patients. Results were similar across all combined treatment regimens. Although no statistical analysis was undertaken, the figures suggest there were no significant differences between the treatment regimens. In the other study, mifamurtide-related adverse events were reported as clinical toxic effects of mifamurtide in relapsed osteosarcoma, which included chills, fever and headache for the initial dose of mifamurtide, while for the subsequent doses of mifamurtide all patients reported toxicity as delayed fatigue. The available evidence on the effectiveness of mifamurtide in addition to a standard chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of high-grade osteosarcoma is limited and therefore no definitive conclusions can be made.

Screening for Metastatic Osteosarcoma Biomarkers with a DNA Microarray

The aim of this study was to screen for possible biomarkers of metastatic osteosarcoma (OS) using a DNA microarray. We downloaded the gene expression profile GSE49003 from Gene Expression Omnibus database, which included 6 gene chips from metastatic and 6 from non-metastatic OS patients. The R package was used to screen and identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between metastatic and non-metastatic OS patients. Then we compared the expression of DEGs in the two groups and sub-grouped into up-regulated and down-regulated, followed by functional enrichment analysis using the DAVID system. Subsequently, we constructed an miRNA-DEG regulatory network with the help of WebGestalt software. A total of 323 DEGs, including 134 up-regulated and 189 down-regulated, were screened out. The up-regulated DEGs were enriched in 14 subcategories and most significantly in cytoskeleton organization, while the down-regulated DEGs were prevalent in 13 subcategories, especially wound healing. In addition, we identified two important miRNAs (miR-202 and miR-9) pivotal for OS metastasis, and their relevant genes, CALD1 and STX1A. MiR-202 and miR-9 are potential key factors affecting the metastasis of OS and CALD1 and STX1A may be possible targets beneficial for the treatment of metastatic OS. However, further experimental studies are needed to confirm our results.

Histological necrosis ratio (HNR) surrogacy for disease-free survival (DFS) in osteosarcoma patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

e20513 Background: The positive impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on disease free survival (DFS) for patients with osteosarcoma is well established. At the same time, the extend of histological tumor necrosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a strong prognostic factor for such patients. The present work sought evaluate if histological necrosis (≥ 90% of necrotic tumor) can be used as predictor of DFS benefit. Methods: Systematic review was undertaken in MEDLINE, EMBASE and ASCO proceedings to identify randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing chemotherapy regimens in neoadjuvant setting for non-metastatic osteosarcoma patients. Trials including biologic agents were excluded. The HNR was calculated for each trial dividing histological necrosis frequency in control arm by necrosis frequency in experimental arm. HNR results were plotted against PFS hazard ratios and Spearman correlation was generated. Results: Six reports of randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials were judged fair-quality and subjected to the meta-analysis. A total of 1573 patients were included. All trials used in the control arms doxorubicin while five used methotrexate-based regimens. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between DFS and HNR was 0.88. Sensitive analysis corroborated our findings. The estimated HNR threshold for DFS benefit was 0.72. Conclusions: HNR might be an interesting tool in early accessing effects of new chemotherapy regimens against osteosarcoma, taking in account the concerns about histological necrosis evaluation and the need for threshold validation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Osteosarcoma of the Extremities in Preadolescent Patients

Medical records of 133 patients, 10 years old or younger with primary high-grade nonmetastatic osteosarcoma of the extremities treated at the Rizzoli Institute between 1983 and 1999 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy were reviewed and compared with those of 782 patients aged 11 to 40 years treated in the same period with the same chemotherapy protocols. In comparison to the older group, the younger group had more females, more patients with normal lactic dehydrogenase levels, and more non-limb-salvage procedures (amputation or rotationplasty). Five-year event-free and overall survivals were essentially the same in the two groups (63% and 71% vs. 60% and 70%) as were the patients rescued after relapse and presently event-free (18% vs. 20%). The authors conclude that there does not seem to be any indication to treat preadolescent primary high-grade nonmetastatic osteosarcoma patients by alternative and/or more aggressive therapies.

Late Relapse in Osteosarcoma

The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors of late relapse in nonmetastatic osteosarcoma patients treated at the Rizzoli Institute from 1983 to 1997. Clinical features of patients who had late (>4 y of follow-up) or earlier recurrence were compared. Late relapse was reported in 24 (3.7%) of the 648 patients who entered the studies. A surgical complete remission was achieved in 19 (79%) patients. The 5-year probability of postrelapse survival was 65% for the complete remission patients (48% in the entire group), which was significantly better than that of the patients (5-year postrelapse survival 20%) with an early relapse. Sex, site, and size of the tumor, histologic subtype, alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase serum levels, type of surgery, and histologic response did not significantly differ between patients with late or early relapse. No clinical predictive factors of late relapse were identified and a prolonged follow-up is recommended for all patients.