Bridge structures deteriorate over time due to factors like corrosion, fatigue, aging of materials, and unexpected natural or accidental events. Consequently, the vibrations measured in these structures exhibit time-varying and non-stationary characteristics. Additionally, non-linearities are inherent in these structures due to material behavior, boundary condition changes, and joints or connections. Analysis of non-linear and non-stationary structural vibration data is necessary to extract information on the condition of the bridge. Most methods assessing bridge conditions from acceleration responses rely on the Power Spectral Density (PSD) which is based on the Fourier Transform. However, the accuracy of the Fourier transforms for non-linear and non-stationary signals limits its application potential. The Hilbert–Huang Transform (HHT) has emerged as an alternative for handling these non-stationary signals due to its time-frequency-energy representation. This study provides a comparative study of both techniques by utilizing the data obtained from continuously monitored Pamban Bridge. This steel truss bridge was fitted with accelerometers to record bidirectional acceleration time histories at twenty bottom node points on the bridge. This study examines the continuous variations in the frequency component by both methods for 136 days. A linear best-fit trendline is obtained for the frequency parameters at different sensor positions. The slope and intercept values of this linear best fit trendline is further studied. The HHT showcases various evolving dominant frequency components over time in contrast to the PSD representation. The frequency spectrum from the HHT displays less variation over time at each sensor position compared to the predominant peak value derived from the PSD of the acceleration signal. The spatial variability in the predominant frequency obtained from HHT is also less than the PSD. Therefore, the ability of HHT to discriminate damages needs further investigations.