Brown spots and moles often give rise to cosmetic complaints and removal with lasers and non-laser light sources may seem advantageous. However, pigmented skin lesions comprise a diversity of lesions, some of which are well treated with lasers, i.e. benign epidermal lesions such as ephelides and lentigo benigna, and others for which laser exposure is controversial or even contradictory, i.e. melanocytic nevi, dysplastic nevi and malignant melanoma [1]. A recent publication has highlighted the need for careful evaluation of pigmented lesions prior to laser treatment due to the fact that distinguishing a benign lesion from other pigmented lesions can be difficult [2]. Laser treatment of melanocytic nevi remains controversial, since these may possess the potential of progressing into their malignant counterparts. That being said, various types of quality-switched pigment-specific and ablative lasers are used to lighten and remove melanocytic nevi [1–7]. In literature, case reports are presented on pseudo-melanoma, malignant melanoma and metastases after laser exposure of pigmented skin lesions [8, 9] and in vitro studies have shown altered expression of tumour suppressor (p16) gene and adhesion molecules in melanoma cell lines [10]. In May 2010, a 41-year-old Danish male visited a laser spa in Japan, requesting removal of four brown– black pigmented lesions on his left lower arm, armpit, neck and scalp. He entered directly from the street and no pre-appointment or medical referral was required. A therapist wearing a white coat inspected the lesions and offered to remove these with a laser device. Dermoscopy was not performed, neither were biopsies taken. Expenses for laser removal of the four pigmented lesions amounted a total of 10 EUR. The patient explained that treatment was initiated with infiltration anaesthesia and the laser exposure a burning procedure performed with a hand piece, from which intense red light was directed against the skin lesions leaving smoke generation. The procedure was followed by ulceration that healed after 7–10 days. Approximately 3 months after laser treatment, the patient noticed the emergence of skin eruptions on his left lower left arm. December 2011, 19 months after the laser exposure, he was referred to a dermatologist due to persistently growing tumours on his arm. On examination, the patient was fair skinned with moderate to severe dermatoheliosis. He had no family history of malignant melanoma, but received massive sun exposure from 12years of living in Thailand with only occasional use of sun protection. Tumours presented as three subcutaneous, firm nodules with a purple hue and two red, fleshy, protruding elements, involving an area of 7×5 cm. Solitary lesions were up to 1.5 cm in diameter (Fig. 1). Clinically, there were no palpable lymph glands. Dermoscopy showed no pigmentation pattern but a structure-less appearance with increased vascularisation and inflammation without epidermal changes. Skin biopsy showed a deeply located T. H. Larsen :M. Nielsen :R. Lindskov Private Practice of Dermatology, Panoptikon Banegaardspladsen 15, 1570, NV, Copenhagen, Denmark
Read full abstract